Military Review

The tests of the MiG-35 for the Russian military department will be held this year.

46
In the current year, two MiG-35 will be tested, the results of which will decide the issue of concluding a contract with the Russian Defense Ministry, reports RIA News a message from the general director of the MiG corporation Sergey Korotkov.




“We will first carry out factory tests, and then, in the same year, for the Ministry of Defense. We are ready to conclude a contract at any time, a decision for the Ministry of Defense, which is awaiting the results of these tests ",
said the CEO at the FIDAE-2016 trade show in Chile.

He noted that the aircraft, which will be presented to the military at the test, are currently undergoing the final assembly stage.

“Today, two MiG-35 airplanes are in the general assembly shop, they will be assembled shortly, and this year we will begin flight tests to confirm the technical characteristics that were submitted to the Defense Ministry to conclude a serial production and supply contract,” Korotkov.
Photos used:
http://www.dogswar.ru
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 30 March 2016 17: 39
    +3
    An hour per teaspoon. Well, albeit so.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 30 March 2016 17: 46
      +3
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      An hour per teaspoon.

      "This year will be held Test two MiG-35 ". yes
      1. Nevsky_ZU
        Nevsky_ZU 30 March 2016 17: 54
        +15
        and this year we will begin flight tests in order to confirm the technical characteristics that were exhibited by the Ministry of Defense to conclude a contract for serial production and supply


        I do not believe!!!

        Forgive me, but I'm in every news about the Mig-35, I will put this video, because I really had hope in 2012-2013 that the M-35 was about to enter service on the HQ (then Air Force)

        attention with 1: 39 (date of the movie 2013 year)

        1. Eugene-Eugene
          Eugene-Eugene 30 March 2016 18: 10
          +4
          * Per hour by teaspoon.

          "In 2014, the Russian aviation industry set several records at once. According to Regnum, the production of military aircraft, taking into account exports, amounted to at least 124 units. Thus, Russia not only surpassed the best Soviet times (in 1983-1990, on average, 110 military aircraft were built ), but also came out on top in the world: in 2014 the United States produced no more than 100 aircraft for the Air Force, using Russian engines China - and even less "[http://vremya4e.com/russia/5556-rossiya-obognala-ssha -po-vypusku-boevyh-samolet
          ov.html].

          At the same time, it is necessary, at a minimum, to take into account the substantially increased (compared to the time of the Cold War) aviation power and the wide distribution of EW facilities and, as a result, the laboriousness of the production process and, accordingly, the cost have increased significantly.

          In general, Mavrikiy, such a question for you - are you a complete miser and for you and 1000 planes will seem like a drop in the ocean, or are you just a talker who knows nothing about the subject of the article?
          1. dyksi
            dyksi 30 March 2016 19: 06
            +17
            Sorry, but the Soviet Union produced a thousand or more front-line aircraft a year. One MiG-23 a year was produced by 130 units, plus two hundred MiG-21s, one hundred MiG-29s, fifty MiG-31s. As well as dozens of Su-27, Su-22, Su-24. Where did you see the superiority in the production of military aircraft. Add here, transport aviation, long-range aviation, as well as from two to four hundred helicopters per year. The current aviation industry is a pale shadow of the Soviet and nothing more.
            1. Eugene-Eugene
              Eugene-Eugene 30 March 2016 19: 20
              +2
              Yeah, and IL-2 made 36 000 pcs. So the period of late socialism is a miserable shadow of wartime.
            2. silver_roman
              silver_roman 31 March 2016 08: 43
              +1
              Do not compare the series of those cars and modern ones. I am sure that you clearly understand the difference between the first production MiG-29s and, say, the MiG-29OVT.
              Complex systems require more thorough testing. That and production capacities are not the same.
              Nowadays, only Americans can rivet 100 units of F-35 at once.
        2. SklochPensioner
          SklochPensioner 30 March 2016 18: 19
          +1
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          I do not believe!!!

          And really: maybe there is no Korotkov for 3 years, and the interview is repeated in the recording?))
          Besides jokes, maybe the state does not have EXTRA money?
          Question...
        3. dyksi
          dyksi 30 March 2016 19: 29
          0
          The production of the MiG-35 will continue to be delayed, three people from Sukhoi sit on the board of directors of the RSK, it is not difficult to guess what they are doing there. Until the two firms are divorced, everything will continue. VEB owns Sukhoi shares, and it is patronized by the country's leadership. There was also such a cool project MiG-41, the model had already been blown over, the bird was a beauty, And now the MiG-31 will be taken as a basis, (the interceptor is cool) only the requirements for the interceptor are not sour. Speed ​​4000-4500 km per hour. huge combat radius, is it possible to implement all this on the MiG-31, that's the question. All the money in the next three years will go to the T-50, Su-35, We wrote about this on our resource. Although Sergey Korotkov himself has repeatedly stated that the MiG-35 is ready for production. It will also be necessary to see in what configuration the car will be tested.
          1. VP
            VP 30 March 2016 19: 58
            0
            Well, what does it mean ready for production if the military has not yet tested it?
            Maybe after testing it will be further developed a couple of years.
        4. opus
          opus 31 March 2016 02: 18
          +2
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          I do not believe!!!

          I really hope that it will happen

          "Pylon" of the Russian sky



          35th is just needed


          even more so at a price of $ 45,0 million / piece
        5. silver_roman
          silver_roman 31 March 2016 08: 40
          0
          wildly ashamed of the question, but in the fragments of the video, where the aircraft is in the air, is it not drying?
          Well, at least kill me, I don’t understand. I just know that our great zhurnalyugi can easily put the Su-35 into the report about the MiG-35!
          Usually I distinguish them in the shape of the fuselage between the engines: the dryers have a more oblong body like the one in the video.
  2. Limon1972
    Limon1972 30 March 2016 17: 40
    -12%
    Handsome. We are waiting for the change MIG 31 good
    1. kit-kat
      kit-kat 30 March 2016 17: 47
      0
      And how does he differ from MIG-29 externally?
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 30 March 2016 17: 47
      +13
      Quote: Limon1972
      We are waiting for the change MIG 31

      But!!!
      That you famously want to replace the high-altitude interceptor front-line fighter!
      MIG-31 - MIG-31BM - MIG-41 - this is a chain of interceptors
      MIG-29- MIG-29СМ - MIG-35 - and this is for light battlefield fighters. yes
      1. Ride78
        Ride78 30 March 2016 18: 22
        +1
        Surely, the man had this in mind, we expect a change of moment 31 to moment 41. Do not be so clever) Everything is in the know.
      2. vv3
        vv3 30 March 2016 19: 06
        0
        The MIG-35 belongs to the class of medium fighters, but for the price of a heavy one. It has old engines that are not quite suitable for a 4 + aircraft. Despite the increase in the capacity of the internal tanks on the MIG-35 by 1,5 times compared to the MIG-29 the combat radius of the aircraft is smaller than foreign competitors. In particular, Rafal’s fuel reserve is almost 1,5 times greater, with more efficient engines. 3000 km is the flight range with hanging tanks in the most economic flight mode. The developers do not indicate the combat radius and are clearly crafty. This was the main drawback of the MIG-29, this aircraft was called aircraft gaining dominance over short-range drive. The company needs to be supported, but approaches to the creation of the aircraft need to be changed. It is necessary to actively develop on the basis of the MIG-29 a really light fighter with a new engine and a simplified avionics. At an affordable price for the countries of the 3rd world.
        1. tomket
          tomket 30 March 2016 23: 47
          +3
          Quote: vv3
          1,5 times compared to MIG-29 combat radius of the aircraft is less than foreign competitors

          You seem to forget that the French "Rafale" have only one fighter in service. And you automatically make requirements for the range of a heavy fighter, which is not entirely correct. For those. the mission of the MiG-29 was a FRONT fighter. By the way, the largest number of MiG-29 regiments in the USSR was located in the Western direction, as you know, there was no need to fly far there. Yes, and with the density of airfields, as well as with the density of air regiments, everything was in order.
      3. iConst
        iConst 30 March 2016 19: 43
        0
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        MIG-29- MIG-29СМ - MIG-35 - and this is for light battlefield fighters.

        I watched the TTX (from Vicki) - compared to other enemy fighters - the average. Something is better, something is worse.

        The engines obviously need to be improved - with approximately the same amount of fuel compared to Rafal, the combat radius is almost two times less, although the maximum speed is 2,25M and the rate of climb is higher than the best in this parameter.
        Variable thrust vector - MiG in splendid isolation.

        Everything else - I think, the merit of the unsurpassed glider.

        What is his place in modern military tactics?
        1. opus
          opus 31 March 2016 02: 31
          +1
          Quote: iConst
          What is his place in modern military tactics?

          RD-33MK is still old, and the Snecma M88 is newer (it does General Electric F404 with a bang)

          You do not compare with Dassault Rafale, their 140-150 pieces in total.

          Compare with F-16IN Super Viper and F / A-18E / F Super Hornet


          XL (2500 nautical miles b / d) is no longer on the horizon


          Threat. LTX (wiki) are given for the TWO-seat MIG-35, and this is like it or not, 900-1600 kg of excess weight and about 0,7 cubic meters of excess volume

          For a single, the indicators will be better
      4. Limon1972
        Limon1972 30 March 2016 20: 04
        -1
        Quote: BoA KAA
        Quote: Limon1972
        We are waiting for the change MIG 31

        But!!!
        That you famously want to replace the high-altitude interceptor front-line fighter!
        MIG-31 - MIG-31BM - MIG-41 - this is a chain of interceptors
        MIG-29- MIG-29СМ - MIG-35 - and this is for light battlefield fighters. yes

        Well, it’s like a hedgehog, it’s clear that the change is intercepted, and not one on the other.
    3. DMB_95
      DMB_95 30 March 2016 18: 24
      0
      Quote: Limon1972
      Handsome. We are waiting for the change MIG 31 good

      What, damn it, the change of the MiG-31? A completely different plane.
      1. cumastra1
        cumastra1 30 March 2016 18: 57
        0
        Somewhere I saw a MIG with a reverse sweep of the wing. Signed was MIG 35. Overlay probably.
        1. PSih2097
          PSih2097 30 March 2016 23: 34
          +2
          Quote: cumastra1
          Somewhere I saw a MIG with a reverse sweep of the wing. Signed was MIG 35. Overlay probably.

          it was not a MiG, but a Su-37 (47) Berkut, a carrier for the Ulyanovsk ATAVKR ...
          1. cumastra1
            cumastra1 31 March 2016 18: 35
            0
            Thank you as if he is a golden eagle.
        2. opus
          opus 31 March 2016 14: 08
          0
          Quote: cumastra1
          Somewhere I saw a MIG with a reverse sweep of the wing.

          There were no flashes
          Quote: PSih2097
          a Su-37 (47) Berkut, a carrier for the ATAVKR "Ulyanovsk" ..

          Not only
          Belyaev BP-2 (TsAGI-2), 1934


          experimental glider LL-Z (Ts-1 (Tsybin-single) experimental glider No. 3), 1947

          IL-14 USSR-91612, 1950


          CP-10


      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Limon1972
        Limon1972 30 March 2016 20: 07
        -1
        Hmm. For the understanding, this meant the second aircraft shift 31.
      4. opus
        opus 31 March 2016 14: 47
        +1
        Quote: DMB_95
        What, damn it, the change of the MiG-31?

        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        But!!!
        That you famously want to replace the high-altitude interceptor front-line fighter!

        Bliiin you will read that when the thread, WHAT is written?
        and comprehend?
        Dmitry (Limon1972) THIS AND HAD SEE
        Quote: Limon1972
        Handsome (this is about MIG-35). We are waiting for the change MIG 31 (This is about the "MiG-33" - a likely prototype of the MiG-41 project)


        It is about the PERSPECTIVE AVIATION COMPLEX OF FAR INTERCESS (PAK DP)
        PROMISING AVIATION COMPLEX DISTANT INTERCEPT (PAK DP)


        About the one on which "Zaslon-2" will be delivered: General Director of "V.V. Tikhomirov "Yuri Bely on August 12, 2015 said that in" V.V. Tikhomirov "already work has begun on determining the appearance of the electronic complex of a promising long-range interception aircraft complex (PAK DP) which in the future will replace the MiG-31. vol.70.1


        something similar was considered in the Sukhoi Design Bureau on the basis of the T-4. In March 1970, it was issued and sent to the addressees of the IZ under the name "Aircraft long-range intercept missile system T-4P". Radar type "Smerch-100" or "Zaslon", missiles - K-100, main. the information channel was supposed to be the BO radar



        ------------------------------------
        Quote: Limon1972
        Hmm. For the understanding, this meant the second aircraft shift 31.


        Threat
        the number of stupid minuses to the address (Limon1972) is simply amazing.
        Impression of myomas ran, spoiled, ran on. Stupid feeling?
  3. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 30 March 2016 17: 41
    0
    It should not be a contract, but a state order and how many units are needed!
  4. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 30 March 2016 17: 42
    +3
    There will be a radar --- there will be an order.
  5. Tan4ik
    Tan4ik 30 March 2016 17: 43
    +2
    It feels like for someone else wink
  6. Evgesh91
    Evgesh91 30 March 2016 17: 48
    +1
    Mig31 he does not replace, only Mig29 and others like him. and handsome is for sure, Migi always liked smile
  7. Herman
    Herman 30 March 2016 17: 50
    0
    It is necessary to somehow change the fleet of "tired" MiG-29s, it will be a little expensive to replace the Su-35, I need a light and cheaper fighter.
    1. max702
      max702 30 March 2016 19: 12
      -2
      The MiG-35 has already caught up in cost with the SU-35 .. With an incomparable combat effectiveness, and this despite the fact that the MiG-35 does not exist in real life, all of its characteristics have not been confirmed and are available only on paper .. The only need for it it is to load the available capacities by giving people work, with the adoption of weapons there is a chance of export supplies .. The Russian Ministry of Defense does not need it! The performance characteristics are categorically unsuitable, and at the same time they bring in an expensive garbage in the troops .. The myth about the cheapness and "lightness" of this aircraft has been completely dispelled ..
      1. Herman
        Herman 30 March 2016 20: 10
        +1
        As for the myth of lightness, I do not lie with you, all the same, between the empty instant-35 and su-35
        8000 kg of mass.
        1. max702
          max702 30 March 2016 23: 40
          0
          Quote: Herman
          As for the myth of lightness, I do not lie with you, all the same, between the empty instant-35 and su-35
          8000 kg of mass.

          Well, what's the point? What is there with the database radius and payload? The main and not eradicable misfortune of Miga is its scanty database radius, especially in light of recent events when planes need to operate for thousands of km, urgently need to transfer planes to another theater of action, so what? And the presence in the airspace of the conflict for whom is it easier to organize? Here we looked at all this in the Moscow Region and scored a bolt on Mig .. Moreover, all the characteristics are only in PROMISES! Actually, there is nothing yet, and DRYs have been produced for more than a year and in very marketable quantities. Why do we need a completely different plane to the troops with mediocre characteristics? This is a different service, training, simulators, tactics and much more .. And all this costs time and money! And why is this hemorrhoid MO? It remains only to export! There is a niche for these airplanes, if they pass the tests they confirm what is stated and will be adopted by the Russian Aerospace Forces .. For the sake of this, the whole circus ..
          1. Herman
            Herman 31 March 2016 00: 28
            0
            Perhaps I agree with you (minus not mine), maybe you are right and it should be taken into service only because of export.
  8. gas113
    gas113 30 March 2016 17: 51
    +4
    It would be the USSR on flying saucers just fly.
    1. Petrof
      Petrof 30 March 2016 17: 56
      -5
      in between queues for condensed milk or stew laughing
      1. Petrof
        Petrof 30 March 2016 18: 11
        -2
        the minders are clearly not standing in such lines laughing
        they don’t know
        1. alex13-61
          alex13-61 30 March 2016 18: 32
          +1
          I did not observe the queues in the co-trade. Yes, the price there was higher than in the state trade, but there was also stew. and sausage.
          1. Black Colonel
            Black Colonel 30 March 2016 19: 19
            +1
            Not many people had incomes to roam about co-trading.
        2. Black Colonel
          Black Colonel 30 March 2016 19: 21
          +3
          Either they caught their eyes, or they didn’t really roll call in the queues.
      2. fzr1000
        fzr1000 30 March 2016 18: 13
        +1
        Bursts of laser blasters and plasma annihilators
    2. WAGNER
      WAGNER 30 March 2016 17: 56
      +2
      Quote: gas113
      It would be the USSR on flying saucers just fly.

      Or maybe there are such developments ....
  9. hartlend
    hartlend 30 March 2016 19: 42
    +5
    Here they comment on an article about the MIG-35, and not about sausage.
  10. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 30 March 2016 21: 28
    +1
    MiG-35 tests for the Russian military department will be
    When they pass, then write. In the meantime - a fat minus.
  11. BABA SHURA
    BABA SHURA 30 March 2016 22: 26
    -2
    The plane is released out of despair to replace it with nothing. Perhaps he is needed in the troops, but not money. So that people are not dispersed, they do what they can, in 9 months one car will pay for all the fuss. As a car, VAZ produced four to the last. Like OSFAR producing headlights of the 50s, because there is nothing and no one to do something. Mig 35 is a good car but from the past. She has no future. It would be better to start creating "SKAT" on the basis of the moment 29. Drones are also needed ?!
    1. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex 31 March 2016 06: 51
      +1
      And also the development of Jedi swords and the construction of the "death star".
  12. nik13
    nik13 30 March 2016 23: 19
    +1
    I do not believe!!!

    Today was the first to fly))