The tests of the MiG-35 for the Russian military department will be held this year.

In the current year, two MiG-35 will be tested, the results of which will decide the issue of concluding a contract with the Russian Defense Ministry, reports RIA News a message from the general director of the MiG corporation Sergey Korotkov.

“We will first carry out factory tests, and then, in the same year, for the Ministry of Defense. We are ready to conclude a contract at any time, a decision for the Ministry of Defense, which is awaiting the results of these tests ",

said the CEO at the FIDAE-2016 trade show in Chile.

He noted that the aircraft, which will be presented to the military at the test, are currently undergoing the final assembly stage.

“Today, two MiG-35 airplanes are in the general assembly shop, they will be assembled shortly, and this year we will begin flight tests to confirm the technical characteristics that were submitted to the Defense Ministry to conclude a serial production and supply contract,” Korotkov.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

An hour per teaspoon. Well, albeit so.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Mavrikiy

An hour per teaspoon.

"This year will be held Test two MiG-35 ".

[Nevsky_ZU]

and this year we will begin flight tests in order to confirm the technical characteristics that were exhibited by the Ministry of Defense to conclude a contract for serial production and supply

I do not believe!!!

Forgive me, but I'm in every news about the Mig-35, I will put this video, because I really had hope in 2012-2013 that the M-35 was about to enter service on the HQ (then Air Force)

attention with 1: 39 (date of the movie 2013 year)

[Eugene-Eugene]

* Per hour by teaspoon.

"In 2014, the Russian aviation industry set several records at once. According to Regnum, the production of military aircraft, taking into account exports, amounted to at least 124 units. Thus, Russia not only surpassed the best Soviet times (in 1983-1990, on average, 110 military aircraft were built ), but also came out on top in the world: in 2014 the United States produced no more than 100 aircraft for the Air Force, using Russian engines China - and even less "[http://vremya4e.com/russia/5556-rossiya-obognala-ssha -po-vypusku-boevyh-samolet
ov.html].

At the same time, it is necessary, at a minimum, to take into account the substantially increased (compared to the time of the Cold War) aviation power and the wide distribution of EW facilities and, as a result, the laboriousness of the production process and, accordingly, the cost have increased significantly.

In general, Mavrikiy, such a question for you - are you a complete miser and for you and 1000 planes will seem like a drop in the ocean, or are you just a talker who knows nothing about the subject of the article?

[dyksi]

Sorry, but the Soviet Union produced a thousand or more front-line aircraft a year. One MiG-23 a year was produced by 130 units, plus two hundred MiG-21s, one hundred MiG-29s, fifty MiG-31s. As well as dozens of Su-27, Su-22, Su-24. Where did you see the superiority in the production of military aircraft. Add here, transport aviation, long-range aviation, as well as from two to four hundred helicopters per year. The current aviation industry is a pale shadow of the Soviet and nothing more.

[Eugene-Eugene]

Yeah, and IL-2 made 36 000 pcs. So the period of late socialism is a miserable shadow of wartime.

[silver_roman]

Do not compare the series of those cars and modern ones. I am sure that you clearly understand the difference between the first production MiG-29s and, say, the MiG-29OVT.
Complex systems require more thorough testing. That and production capacities are not the same.
Nowadays, only Americans can rivet 100 units of F-35 at once.

[SklochPensioner]

Quote: Nevsky_ZU

I do not believe!!!

And really: maybe there is no Korotkov for 3 years, and the interview is repeated in the recording?))
Besides jokes, maybe the state does not have EXTRA money?
Question...

[dyksi]

The production of the MiG-35 will continue to be delayed, three people from Sukhoi sit on the board of directors of the RSK, it is not difficult to guess what they are doing there. Until the two firms are divorced, everything will continue. VEB owns Sukhoi shares, and it is patronized by the country's leadership. There was also such a cool project MiG-41, the model had already been blown over, the bird was a beauty, And now the MiG-31 will be taken as a basis, (the interceptor is cool) only the requirements for the interceptor are not sour. Speed ​​4000-4500 km per hour. huge combat radius, is it possible to implement all this on the MiG-31, that's the question. All the money in the next three years will go to the T-50, Su-35, We wrote about this on our resource. Although Sergey Korotkov himself has repeatedly stated that the MiG-35 is ready for production. It will also be necessary to see in what configuration the car will be tested.

[VP]

Well, what does it mean ready for production if the military has not yet tested it?
Maybe after testing it will be further developed a couple of years.

[opus]

Quote: Nevsky_ZU

I do not believe!!!

I really hope that it will happen

"Pylon" of the Russian sky

35th is just needed

even more so at a price of $ 45,0 million / piece

[silver_roman]

wildly ashamed of the question, but in the fragments of the video, where the aircraft is in the air, is it not drying?
Well, at least kill me, I don’t understand. I just know that our great zhurnalyugi can easily put the Su-35 into the report about the MiG-35!
Usually I distinguish them in the shape of the fuselage between the engines: the dryers have a more oblong body like the one in the video.

[Lemon1972]

Handsome. We are waiting for the change MIG 31

[kit-kat]

And how does he differ from MIG-29 externally?

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Limon1972

We are waiting for the change MIG 31

But!!!
That you famously want to replace the high-altitude interceptor front-line fighter!
MIG-31 - MIG-31BM - MIG-41 - this is a chain of interceptors
MIG-29- MIG-29СМ - MIG-35 - and this is for light battlefield fighters.

[ride78]

Surely, the man had this in mind, we expect a change of moment 31 to moment 41. Do not be so clever) Everything is in the know.

[vv3]

The MIG-35 belongs to the class of medium fighters, but for the price of a heavy one. It has old engines that are not quite suitable for a 4 + aircraft. Despite the increase in the capacity of the internal tanks on the MIG-35 by 1,5 times compared to the MIG-29 the combat radius of the aircraft is smaller than foreign competitors. In particular, Rafal’s fuel reserve is almost 1,5 times greater, with more efficient engines. 3000 km is the flight range with hanging tanks in the most economic flight mode. The developers do not indicate the combat radius and are clearly crafty. This was the main drawback of the MIG-29, this aircraft was called aircraft gaining dominance over short-range drive. The company needs to be supported, but approaches to the creation of the aircraft need to be changed. It is necessary to actively develop on the basis of the MIG-29 a really light fighter with a new engine and a simplified avionics. At an affordable price for the countries of the 3rd world.

[tomket]

Quote: vv3

1,5 times compared to MIG-29 combat radius of the aircraft is less than foreign competitors

You seem to forget that the French "Rafale" have only one fighter in service. And you automatically make requirements for the range of a heavy fighter, which is not entirely correct. For those. the mission of the MiG-29 was a FRONT fighter. By the way, the largest number of MiG-29 regiments in the USSR was located in the Western direction, as you know, there was no need to fly far there. Yes, and with the density of airfields, as well as with the density of air regiments, everything was in order.

[iConst]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

MIG-29- MIG-29СМ - MIG-35 - and this is for light battlefield fighters.

I watched the TTX (from Vicki) - compared to other enemy fighters - the average. Something is better, something is worse.

The engines obviously need to be improved - with approximately the same amount of fuel compared to Rafal, the combat radius is almost two times less, although the maximum speed is 2,25M and the rate of climb is higher than the best in this parameter.
Variable thrust vector - MiG in splendid isolation.

Everything else - I think, the merit of the unsurpassed glider.

What is his place in modern military tactics?

[opus]

Quote: iConst

What is his place in modern military tactics?

RD-33MK is still old, and the Snecma M88 is newer (it does General Electric F404 with a bang)

You do not compare with Dassault Rafale, their 140-150 pieces in total.

Compare with F-16IN Super Viper and F / A-18E / F Super Hornet

XL (2500 nautical miles b / d) is no longer on the horizon

Threat. LTX (wiki) are given for the TWO-seat MIG-35, and this is like it or not, 900-1600 kg of excess weight and about 0,7 cubic meters of excess volume

For a single, the indicators will be better

[Lemon1972]

Quote: BoA KAA

Quote: Limon1972

We are waiting for the change MIG 31

But!!!
That you famously want to replace the high-altitude interceptor front-line fighter!
MIG-31 - MIG-31BM - MIG-41 - this is a chain of interceptors
MIG-29- MIG-29СМ - MIG-35 - and this is for light battlefield fighters.

Well, it’s like a hedgehog, it’s clear that the change is intercepted, and not one on the other.

[DMB_95]

Quote: Limon1972

Handsome. We are waiting for the change MIG 31

What, damn it, the change of the MiG-31? A completely different plane.

[cumastra1]

Somewhere I saw a MIG with a reverse sweep of the wing. Signed was MIG 35. Overlay probably.

[PSih2097]

Quote: cumastra1

Somewhere I saw a MIG with a reverse sweep of the wing. Signed was MIG 35. Overlay probably.

it was not a MiG, but a Su-37 (47) Berkut, a carrier for the Ulyanovsk ATAVKR ...

[cumastra1]

Thank you as if he is a golden eagle.

[opus]

Quote: cumastra1

Somewhere I saw a MIG with a reverse sweep of the wing.

There were no flashes

Quote: PSih2097

a Su-37 (47) Berkut, a carrier for the ATAVKR "Ulyanovsk" ..

Not only
Belyaev BP-2 (TsAGI-2), 1934

experimental glider LL-Z (Ts-1 (Tsybin-single) experimental glider No. 3), 1947

IL-14 USSR-91612, 1950

CP-10

[Lemon1972]

Hmm. For the understanding, this meant the second aircraft shift 31.

[opus]

Quote: DMB_95

What, damn it, the change of the MiG-31?

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

But!!!
That you famously want to replace the high-altitude interceptor front-line fighter!

Bliiin you will read that when the thread, WHAT is written?
and comprehend?
Dmitry (Limon1972) THIS AND HAD SEE

Quote: Limon1972

Handsome (this is about MIG-35). We are waiting for the change MIG 31 (This is about the "MiG-33" - a likely prototype of the MiG-41 project)

It is about the PERSPECTIVE AVIATION COMPLEX OF FAR INTERCESS (PAK DP)
PROMISING AVIATION COMPLEX DISTANT INTERCEPT (PAKDP)

About the one on which "Zaslon-2" will be delivered: General Director of "V.V. Tikhomirov "Yuri Bely on August 12, 2015 said that in" V.V. Tikhomirov "already work has begun on determining the appearance of the electronic complex of a promising long-range interception aircraft complex (PAK DP) which in the future will replace the MiG-31. vol.70.1

something similar was considered in the Sukhoi Design Bureau on the basis of the T-4. In March 1970, it was issued and sent to the addressees of the IZ under the name "Aircraft long-range intercept missile system T-4P". Radar type "Smerch-100" or "Zaslon", missiles - K-100, main. the information channel was supposed to be the BO radar

------------------------------------

Quote: Limon1972

Hmm. For the understanding, this meant the second aircraft shift 31.

Threat
the number of stupid minuses to the address (Limon1972) is simply amazing.
Impression of myomas ran, spoiled, ran on. Stupid feeling?

[Mavrikiy]

It should not be a contract, but a state order and how many units are needed!

[Thunderbolt]

There will be a radar --- there will be an order.

[Tan4ik]

It feels like for someone else

[Evgesh91]

Mig31 he does not replace, only Mig29 and others like him. and handsome is for sure, Migi always liked

[Herman]

It is necessary to somehow change the fleet of "tired" MiG-29s, it will be a little expensive to replace the Su-35, I need a light and cheaper fighter.

[max702]

The MiG-35 has already caught up in cost with the SU-35 .. With an incomparable combat effectiveness, and this despite the fact that the MiG-35 does not exist in real life, all of its characteristics have not been confirmed and are available only on paper .. The only need for it it is to load the available capacities by giving people work, with the adoption of weapons there is a chance of export supplies .. The Russian Ministry of Defense does not need it! The performance characteristics are categorically unsuitable, and at the same time they bring in an expensive garbage in the troops .. The myth about the cheapness and "lightness" of this aircraft has been completely dispelled ..

[Herman]

As for the myth of lightness, I do not lie with you, all the same, between the empty instant-35 and su-35
8000 kg of mass.

[max702]

Quote: Herman

As for the myth of lightness, I do not lie with you, all the same, between the empty instant-35 and su-35
8000 kg of mass.

Well, what's the point? What is there with the database radius and payload? The main and not eradicable misfortune of Miga is its scanty database radius, especially in light of recent events when planes need to operate for thousands of km, urgently need to transfer planes to another theater of action, so what? And the presence in the airspace of the conflict for whom is it easier to organize? Here we looked at all this in the Moscow Region and scored a bolt on Mig .. Moreover, all the characteristics are only in PROMISES! Actually, there is nothing yet, and DRYs have been produced for more than a year and in very marketable quantities. Why do we need a completely different plane to the troops with mediocre characteristics? This is a different service, training, simulators, tactics and much more .. And all this costs time and money! And why is this hemorrhoid MO? It remains only to export! There is a niche for these airplanes, if they pass the tests they confirm what is stated and will be adopted by the Russian Aerospace Forces .. For the sake of this, the whole circus ..

[Herman]

Perhaps I agree with you (minus not mine), maybe you are right and it should be taken into service only because of export.

[gas113]

It would be the USSR on flying saucers just fly.

[Petrof]

in between queues for condensed milk or stew

[Petrof]

the minders are clearly not standing in such lines
they don’t know

[alex13-61]

I did not observe the queues in the co-trade. Yes, the price there was higher than in the state trade, but there was also stew. and sausage.

[Black Colonel]

Not many people had incomes to roam about co-trading.

[Black Colonel]

Either they caught their eyes, or they didn’t really roll call in the queues.

[fzr1000]

Bursts of laser blasters and plasma annihilators

[WAGNER]

Quote: gas113

It would be the USSR on flying saucers just fly.

Or maybe there are such developments ....

[hartlend]

Here they comment on an article about the MIG-35, and not about sausage.

[Ajent cho]

MiG-35 tests for the Russian military department will be

When they pass, then write. In the meantime - a fat minus.

[BABA SHURA]

The plane is released out of despair to replace it with nothing. Perhaps he is needed in the troops, but not money. So that people are not dispersed, they do what they can, in 9 months one car will pay for all the fuss. As a car, VAZ produced four to the last. Like OSFAR producing headlights of the 50s, because there is nothing and no one to do something. Mig 35 is a good car but from the past. She has no future. It would be better to start creating "SKAT" on the basis of the moment 29. Drones are also needed ?!

[sdc_alex]

And also the development of Jedi swords and the construction of the "death star".

[nik13]

I do not believe!!!

Today was the first to fly))