Training flights of MiG-29KR / KUBR multi-role fighter jets launched in Yeisk

17
Informational portal Yeysk. Info published information that the city launched the latest multi-purpose all-weather fighter MiG-29KR / KUBR. Earlier, three aircraft were tested in Yeysk, which are part of the 279th separate naval fighter aircraft regiment SF. Now the flights of the 100th separate fighter aviation regiment have begun. This regiment is also part of the Northern fleet Russian Federation.

Flights are conducted on the basis of the Center for combat use and retraining of flight personnel. After completing the training flights, the pilots will go to continue the flight tests of the fighters to a special integrated simulator located in the city of Saki. It is there that the skills of taking off and landing on the deck of an aircraft carrier will be mastered.

The training activities are connected with the fact that in about half a year the only aircraft carrier of the Russian Navy Admiral Kuznetsov will begin its long-range march.

Photo by Nikolay Balabaev:

Training flights of MiG-29KR / KUBR multi-role fighter jets launched in Yeisk


For reference: MiG-29KR / KUBR - multipurpose fighter aircraft of the deck-based generation 4 ++. This is a modification for the domestic aircraft carrier of similar fighters, previously delivered under the contract to India. The aircraft has the ability to be operated in all weather conditions. The main purpose of the MiG-29KR / KUBR - air cover in the near zone, the destruction of enemy ground objects and anti-ship protection.

The maximum radius of action - 1,3 thousand. Km. The maximum rocket-bomb load is 4,5 t, the maximum take-off weight is about 22,4 t.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    23 March 2016 12: 19
    The development of carrier-based aviation is the right thing!
    1. +3
      23 March 2016 12: 25
      Excellent. When it was reported that Kuznetsov was going to the BS in the Mediterranean Sea, the question was: - What is the composition of the wing?
      Now it’s clear who will spread rot on the shaitans.
      Small questions remained. But they are solvable.
      7 feet keel and fair wind!
      1. +3
        23 March 2016 12: 33
        In 2030 there will be a new aircraft carrier, because the development of carrier-based aviation should not stop
    2. +3
      23 March 2016 12: 26
      Not only development, but also production, and training, and maintenance.
      "Admiral Kuznetsov" must at least be duplicated!
      1. dyksi
        +2
        23 March 2016 12: 57
        I agree with you that "Kuzya" should be at least duplicated, well, the question arises about the destroyers, full-fledged, I hope that their construction was not abandoned in the 2050s. I wonder how many aircraft carriers and destroyers the Chinese will have by 2030, and the same Indians.
    3. +5
      23 March 2016 12: 47
      I’ll add a video about Mig 29, the mood is good and the video too:
      1. +3
        23 March 2016 17: 00
        Quote: Samaritan
        I’ll add a video about Mig 29, the mood is good and the video too:

        from 2:40 to 2:50 personally my mood completely ruined recourse very jealous of such sales am , and since I don’t have the opportunity to fully watch the movie (all traffic will be eaten up), I’ll go with a bad mood crying laughing
  2. +2
    23 March 2016 12: 25
    The best aircraft for Kuznetsov.
  3. +1
    23 March 2016 12: 30
    Su in my opinion is still better for Kuzi .. heavier .. less .. but on TTX Mig does not pull. 1 car per minute for take-off and 4.5t versus 8t for su..and where are the knots from kuzi delhi?
    1. dyksi
      +1
      23 March 2016 13: 08
      When did you see Crackers taking off from the Kuzi with such a figure? They take off with a maximum of the same four tons. Secondly, they are clean fighters, and if they are made multipurpose, then their mass will grow greatly, which is unacceptable for the Kuzi. The MiG fighter is multipurpose, it can operate by air, land and ships, its radius is within the boundaries of 800-900-hundred kilometers, for an aircraft carrier this is normal, since the aircraft carrier itself is a floating airfield. Moreover, the MiGar can return to the aircraft carrier with weapons, since modern guided weapons cost about a million greenbacks.
  4. 0
    23 March 2016 12: 44
    Maximum range - 1,3 thousand km

    Isn't it a bit much for the MiG or is it with one PTB?
    1. dyksi
      0
      23 March 2016 13: 10
      This figure probably includes refueling in the air, since the fighters themselves can work as tankers.
  5. +2
    23 March 2016 12: 48
    That's good. It is better to have two carrier-based training centers than one.
  6. +2
    23 March 2016 13: 04
    For reference: MiG-29KR / KUBR - multipurpose deck-based fighters of the 4 ++ generation

    Can someone explain to me why then the whole epic with the MiG-35 is needed, if the 29KR / KUBR and so generation 4 ++, has good characteristics in terms of range and load? Isn't it easier to stamp an already used aircraft for the Aerospace Forces, only with a non-folding wing? Or is the MiG-35 - this is the "dry" MiG-29KR / KUBR? To be honest, I'm already completely confused .. request
    1. +3
      23 March 2016 13: 12
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      Or is the MiG-35 - this is the "dry" MiG-29KR / KUBR? To be honest, I'm already completely confused ..

      That is how it is.
    2. dyksi
      +1
      23 March 2016 13: 35
      The MiG-35 is almost two tons lighter (since the structure of the ship is well reinforced), the MiG-35 will be more sophisticated. There the OLS of a completely different level, and his OLSs are "smeared" along the center section, for him the RD-33MK had to be modified in order to increase its combat radius. It is also possible that AFAR can still be put on it (information about this also appears). The MiG-29M / M2 can be compared with a shipbuilder, since it directly grew out of a shipyard. Although of course everything will depend on how much the MiG-35 options are castrated, but in this case it can be brought to the MiG-29SMT, what, what, and we know how to do this, the same AFAR was famously demolished as "unnecessary", although before that they sang that this is his advantage (and this is true, a modern fighter should at least have a phased array). And so, of course, imagine a hyper fancy fighter with a slit that was relevant in the 70s and 80s of the last century.
  7. vv3
    -2
    23 March 2016 18: 48
    Theater of the absurd! Multipurpose fighter on an aircraft carrier and with a funny range of action. How is it?
    Is it he who will fly around the aircraft carrier and destroy all who he finds? 1300 km is a flying range with tanks, combat radius - take 400 km (tanks) and divide by 3 ... The aircraft carrier is mainly attack aircraft, if you remember this is a floating airfield ... And everyone should be afraid only of our presence. maybe for an air show! Then it will go. So to say, the political component .... This is an army, not a circus, gentlemen ....
    1. +1
      23 March 2016 20: 57
      Quote: vv3
      Multipurpose fighter on an aircraft carrier and with a funny range of action. How is it?
      Is it he who will fly around the aircraft carrier and destroy all who he finds? 1300 km is the flying range with tanks, combat radius - take away 400km (tanks) and divide by 3 ... The aircraft carrier is mainly attack aircraft, if you remember this is a floating airfield ..

      The combat radius of the MiG-29 is equal to the radius of the F-18. You do not call f-18е with a ridiculous radius. In addition, what you wrote about PTB frankly does not correspond to reality. The range of the MiG-29k is equal to 2000km. The flight range with 3PTB is- 3000km
      1. vv3
        +1
        24 March 2016 02: 12
        Everyone who served in the Air Force knows the name MIG-29 - this is a plane to gain supremacy in the air over a short-range drive. Do not confuse the respected concepts. Your MIG either takes tanks and missiles and it is almost not needed on an aircraft carrier, or hangs many bombs without tanks and nowhere will not reach. And such it is not needed on an aircraft carrier. Sorry for the primitive, now it’s clear. On the F-18, which I did not touch almost 1.5 times more fuel and much more economical engines. Moreover, for the MIG-29/35 in all descriptions the combat radius with different types of combat load is not indicated, but the flying range (one way) ) without suspensions and at the most economical flight mode. Developers are clearly crafty. But even stating that the capacity of the internal tanks was increased by 35 times on the MIG-1,5, they did not reach the level of the main competitors. I'm not talking about the take-off weight restrictions on our aircraft carrier ... You think the Indians are fools, no, they calculated everything and the tender was lost ...
    2. 0
      24 March 2016 05: 42
      "And everyone should be afraid only of our presence?"

      Judging by the style, flag and content of your letter - this proposal is worth making one, but significant, amendment:

      "And everyone should be afraid only Your his presence? "

      I have the honor
    3. 0
      24 March 2016 05: 42
      "And everyone should be afraid only of our presence?"

      Judging by the style, flag and content of your letter - this proposal is worth making one, but significant, amendment:

      "And everyone should be afraid only Your his presence? "

      I have the honor
  8. 0
    23 March 2016 20: 49
    The preparation of the flight crew of decked aviation is put on stream.
    Two training centers for the flight crew - pleasure is not cheap, but we mastered it, it's great.
    Positive dynamics are observed in all areas of combat training of the armed forces.
    All this causes an optimistic mood.
  9. Hog
    0
    23 March 2016 22: 53
    Finally, they decided to replace the old Su-33.