Russian gas program in the East

46
In the middle of 90-x, the project of laying a gas pipeline from Russia to South Korea came to the discussion. So this idea is not new, the Government of the Republic of Korea even allocated land acquisition for the construction of the pipeline.

Later, in May 2003, Gazprom signed a five-year Cooperation Agreement with the Korean company Kogas. 2008 extended it for another five years and created a permanent joint working group.

The state program to create a unified system of production, transportation and gas supply of Eastern Siberia and the Far East was approved in September by 2007. The possibility of exporting gas to China and the APR countries was also stipulated. Gazprom was appointed coordinator of the Eastern Gas Program.

In June, 2009, the delegation of OAO Gazprom visited the Republic of Korea, and during the visit another agreement was signed on exploring the possibility of gas supplies through the Sakhalin-Khabarovsk-Vladivostok-Korea gas transmission system.

And, finally, the most important impulse to the gas project realization was the negotiations of the head of the Russian Federation with Kim Jong Il and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak in 2011. Korean leaders announced their participation in this large-scale project.

A meeting was held in Moscow by A. Miller (Chairman of the Board of Gazprom), the Minister of Oil Industry of the DPRK and the President of the Kogas company, at which a schedule of natural gas supplies from Russia to South Korea was signed. It is possible that deliveries will begin as early as 2017, and their volume will be of the order of 10-12 billion cubic meters per year.

However, there is still no agreement on joint work in the gas sector between the Russian Federation and the DPRK. Russia considers it necessary to conclude an intergovernmental agreement that will create a reliable legal basis for the implementation of the gas project. Gazprom intends to take over the resolution of financial issues relating to the construction of a gas pipeline on the territory of the DPRK (with Pyongyang) about 700 km long for gas supplies to South Korea. But inevitably problems will arise. associated with the passage of the pipeline through the DMZ (demilitarized zone), and their solution will require tripartite negotiations.

It is important to note that the implementation of this project concerns not only economic, but also geopolitical, strategic aspects related to security issues on the Korean Peninsula. The development of work on the project will contribute to the establishment of trusting relations between North and South Korea, will help resolve the nuclear problem and strengthen the position of peace and stability in Northeast Asia (Northeast Asia). These perspectives correspond to the national interests of the Russian Federation.

However, in the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Kazakhstan there are certain forces that are negatively related to the expansion of Russian economic activity in the region. Also, these political structures seek to achieve political and economic isolation of Pyongyang, in the hope that this will lead to a change in the current regime. Consequently, the joint Russian-Korean gas project is not in the interests of some countries.

At the same time, it is worth noting that Pyongyang is deeply interested in the gas project. First of all, from a purely economic point of view: on average, 150 million dollars a year for the treasury is at least not bad. But the idea to launch a gas pipeline along the bottom of the deep-sea of ​​Japan, bypassing the territory of North Korea, was rejected as not payable.

Russian gas program in the East


Eastern gas project is beneficial to all its participants.

For example, for the Russian Federation - this is one of the ways to integrate into the East Asian economy, which is the main goal of Russia in this region. In the future, gas negotiations with China and Japan are planned.

On the South Korean side, dependence on traditional Middle Eastern gas sources is not very attractive from an economic point of view. In addition, the rapid growth of hydrocarbon energy consumption of the Korean Peninsula’s neighbor is predicted: Japan (especially after the Fukushima tragedy) and the PRC, in which gas consumption will exceed this figure in Europe.

In this regard, there are good prospects for the sale of Russian gas on the Chinese and Japanese markets. Today, Gazprom is engaged in the organization of gas supplies through two pipelines. The volume of supplies is about 70-billion cubic meters and by the 2030 year, the volume of Russian gas exports will reach 13% (whereas in Europe the share of our gas is about 30%). This will lead to an inevitable increase in pressure on the Russian gas market.

Undoubtedly, the dynamic and sustainable development of Kazakhstan will lead to an increase in gas consumption. Today, Kazakhstan is the second largest gas importer in the world after Japan. And besides, the economy of this country is 70% dependent on foreign energy-exporters.

As of today, the policy of the “gas pipeline to the East” is strikingly different from the policy of the past years in that Russia has recently moved from words to deeds. First of all, we are talking about laying the Sakhalin-Khabarovsk-Vladivostok gas pipeline. It is planned that the length of this pipeline will be about 1800 km, capacity - 30 billion cubic meters (the construction of the first stage has been completed). It is also planned to build an Eastern Siberia-Pacific Ocean pipeline, 4188 km in length and 80 oil capacity, million tons of oil per year (in 2014, according to the plan, completion of the second stage construction). The cost of building ESPO amounted to about 14 billion dollars (2 of them were allocated for the construction of the port in Kozmino).

One of the leading roles in the implementation of such large and expensive projects is assigned to the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation V. Putin. It was he who made efforts to redistribute the financial flows and technical resources of Russia in the Eastern direction. Under his influence, the management of Gazprom decided to withdraw significant financial resources from the project to develop the Bovanenkovskoye gas field (on the Yamal Peninsula), the purpose of which was to supply the Western consumer and invest them in the Eastern Gas Supply Project. Today, the construction of pipeline systems does not come with a typical delay for Russia, but even ahead of schedule.

We have achieved considerable success in the deployment of a large tripartite gas project. The most important stage has been passed - a political decision has been made. In the near future, equally important negotiations on the economic part will start, which should lead to the conclusion of a commercial contract in the middle of 2012. The future of the Russia-DPRK-RK project inspires justifiable optimism.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. vadimus
    +5
    14 December 2011 07: 50
    The USA, Japan, are not interested ... Oh, gentlemen, leave ... Fukushima rzgreststi alone, and hide the flocks with another so that the raped beef doesn’t enter our market ... Listen to them more
    1. +2
      14 December 2011 08: 10
      vadimus,
      in vain did the Pindos pass the law on sodomy in the army, now everyone will laugh at them for a long time, I wonder if Bush’s legs are from the same series? wink
    2. +5
      14 December 2011 10: 04
      Japan is just looking for a replacement for the nuclear power industry, and Russian gas will come in handy. And the benefit to us is that Japan will depend on supplies
      1. Max
        Max
        +1
        14 December 2011 10: 34
        Quote: urzul
        And the benefit to us is that Japan will depend on supplies

        You are of course sorry, but who depends on whom, this is a question, since our budget is based on oil and gas, the expression "close the damper" is time to forget!
        1. +2
          14 December 2011 11: 44
          That Europe as winter is so quiet and peaceful. for us, this is an increase in the budget (I mean Japan), but for them it is a strategic resource. They’ll definitely become more careful in the statements
        2. Alexey Prikazchikov
          +1
          14 December 2011 19: 34
          Revenues from gas oil and the entire extractive industry in the budget range from 17 to 19 percent (the figure varies). But the share in their export is 40 percent.
          1. Don
            0
            15 December 2011 17: 18
            Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
            Revenues from gas oil and the entire extractive industry in the budget range from 17 to 19 percent (the figure varies). But the share in their export is 40 percent.

            I completely agree with you Alexey. 17% of the budget is a tax on the extraction of not only oil and gas, but all mineral resources. Many simply do not understand that the budget of the Russian Federation and the export of the Russian Federation are completely different things. If the Russian Federation 40% of exports are oil, gas and oil products, this does not mean that the budget of the Russian Federation is formed by oil and gas. It is simply ridiculous that many believe (especially with the anti-Russian position) that if oil and gas prices fall, then there is nothing to fill the Budget with.
            1. Alexey Prikazchikov
              0
              15 December 2011 18: 17
              At 40 percent, everything includes oil and gas, even wood. Moreover, few people are concerned that our village rises, we export bread, sugar, rice. The vineyards began to be restored, tea will soon be purely Russian, so that we’ll normally climb out onto the seed

              http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/?id=120

              http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/11287/

              http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/11264/

              Here is the news about Zelenograd http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/11254/

              http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/11064/

              But I brought so few examples purely to the seed.
  2. +7
    14 December 2011 08: 42
    do we gasify everything abroad and burn the coal ourselves? diversion gets
    1. +5
      14 December 2011 08: 56
      Quote: cerber
      do we gasify everything abroad and burn the coal ourselves? diversion gets


      Gas stations have higher efficiency, But coal is the cheapest type of fuel. The price of gas will continue to rise, coal will start to win. The government has already stated that the price of gas alone, without transportation, will be $ 242 per thousand cubic meters. In addition, do not forget about the miners are people who need to feed families
      1. +5
        14 December 2011 10: 07
        Coal is mainly used not far from mining sites, in many areas there is still no gas, he himself lived in the Transbaikalia, everything lives on coal there. there was at one time a project to install a gas storage for supplying it with a house, but it was never implemented
        1. +2
          14 December 2011 10: 17
          I'm talking about Th and I write myself first I need to provide !!! then let them lay a pipeline even to the moon; (
          1. +1
            14 December 2011 10: 33
            So we provide ourselves, it’s just that it’s not cost-effective to carry gas everywhere
        2. that
          -1
          14 December 2011 10: 21
          why do they need their citizens?
          they need loot
          I remember on tof going home everyone grabbed on the board from the fence wink to melt titanium, wash
          there was no coal nearby either
          1. that
            -4
            14 December 2011 11: 25
            it was very long ago --- and now I looked on the net about those places --- there are no brigades or boats, the windows in the houses are walled up with bricks, everything is stolen and the homeless people live ... here are the fruits of democracy
            and Medvedev threatens America with his finger wink
            1. 0
              14 December 2011 11: 44
              What are you talking about 7?
              1. that
                -4
                14 December 2011 11: 52
                it's me all about gas, all about gas wink
                innovation, investment and modernization, and the otak of the ethine race close to your horse
  3. Anatoly
    +8
    14 December 2011 08: 59
    Optimistic little article.
    But if you look at it from the other side .. What to rejoice? -. ESPO, ESPO-2, BTS, North and South Streams. Now the project of a gas pipeline to South Korea. Moreover, there are beautiful words about "diversification", "integration into the Asian market", etc. Think about it - we are again trading in raw materials! We have not built a high-tech factory, we do not sell finished products, we do not create any competition in the market. We pump out our bowels again and again. Our folk wealth. Which, let me remind you, constitutionally belongs to every person who was born on the Russian land. And it was so in Soviet times. Let's remember the same Stalin.
    And now, they cut down the taiga floor, put a bunch of oil rigs and our esteemed Tranneft and Gazprom, proudly flaunt the launch of the next oil and gas pipeline! Hypocrisy and undisguised theft! Anyone who thinks that we will get something about this is very wrong.
    At one time, working at ESPO, I was struck by one thing - logging residues (i.e., good, building, perennial forest!), According to the project, it was simply buried along the right of way! And the forest is very, very good.
    I was not the only one to ask this question - how can this be so ?!
    It turns out that during the design of the pipeline, the Japanese know about thousands of hectares of deforestation. They suggested that the Russian Federation cut down the forest at its own expense. At the same time, a certain payment was established and also as payment, all equipment that would work on cutting down was left. But, accordingly, Japan exported the forest to itself.
    It ended with Russian simplicity - Certain people who lobbied for their interests in the government were forced to refuse the Japanese proposal. And at that moment we saw how a national treasure was simply buried in the ground. real money! living forest! there were simply no words ....
    1. that
      -4
      14 December 2011 11: 07
      Glory to the Bears !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    2. Alexey Prikazchikov
      +1
      14 December 2011 19: 38
      Over the past 20 years, forests have greatly increased in area.
  4. Desert Fox
    +2
    14 December 2011 09: 22
    When will we finally sell raw materials to build our plants for the production of any of these raw materials? driving raw materials is much cheaper than making something useful and selling them. By constructing such plants, we will not only create jobs for builders from Tajikistan, who have been experiencing an economic miracle there for 20 years, that they all build it here. But we will later create jobs for our citizens, raise our economy, science, and develop technology again. And I suppose that under such conditions, Western Inistitians will flow to us as well.
  5. +2
    14 December 2011 09: 47
    Vadivak,
    I’m not against the miners, let them mine coal, that's what Russia trades gas left and right (east / west) and throws its residents some more.
  6. +1
    14 December 2011 10: 04
    Desert Fox,
    can investments flow only in whose pocket? probably oligophrenics and medveputam
  7. +2
    14 December 2011 10: 49
    in a newspaper recently read a GAZPROM report in the Novosibirsk region in 2011 a little more than 1000 nonsense homes were gasified PS even the mother is not hunting
  8. +1
    14 December 2011 11: 15
    mi (y) lera k..la brew in the pipe and go through the pipe with a sledgehammer =)) after a few hours you look and wiser a little jamb again into the pipe
    1. that
      -3
      14 December 2011 14: 22
      yes miller
      all once he’s all for the anti-aircraft gun, all for the anti-aircraft gun
  9. +1
    14 December 2011 14: 49
    people like on a mobile phone to put poke poke poke
    1. that
      -2
      14 December 2011 14: 54
      yes it is from meveda their head did not work from the very beginning wink
  10. indrik
    0
    14 December 2011 19: 11
    let’s sell everything at all, and when we run out of gas, people start trading. Pindos don’t sell their hydrocarbon reserves, and they preserve wells for the future, Finns, Swedes and Norway, Canada, etc., they don’t sell their forests they cut it down (we buy a round timber for a penny), and we put furniture and paper into the trident from us sawdust from our timber forest. tear, fuels and lubricants, spare parts are as if for a shuttle and there’s no place to sell products. about from China and Europe pulling everything.
    1. Don
      0
      15 December 2011 18: 06
      Quote: Indric
      Pindos their hydrocarbon reserves are not what they do not sell, and the wells are canned

      Pindos just actively extract their oil: Alaska, Texas, California, Gulf of Mexico. Only they lack it and there is little left for it, and the one that remained the road to mining.
  11. Capture
    0
    14 December 2011 19: 11
    Dear friends ! For the short time that I’m with you, I’m afraid I don’t want to part with you, your opinions on many, including the most important for our state, are valuable material for me, but ...
    1. The portal does not provide communication between members, it is impossible to directly exchange views,
    2. The portal does not provide communication between members of the community and at least moderators,
    3. The portal does not allow you to evaluate the subscriber and replicas on the topic,
    4. There is no way to find out the opponent’s opinion on a particular remark or question,
    5. There is no position of the portal itself on specific issues, etc.
    Goodbye, then it’s no longer interesting ...
    1. that
      -3
      14 December 2011 20: 50
      Yes, there is a party of cops politicians wink
      take at least an ursula - a Moldavian bear - so he knows everything wink just like wikipedia wink
      I will also fast and will soon fall
      1. +1
        14 December 2011 20: 57
        Dear, and where does the political ?? nostalgia or something ??
        1. that
          -3
          14 December 2011 21: 06
          Yes, I see you through etiros wink
          and cop wink
          you spoke here on all issues
          1. +1
            14 December 2011 21: 07
            Well are you a boy on a site so brave ??? what a cop, don’t carry
            1. that
              -3
              14 December 2011 21: 13
              take off your glasses. Moldavian
              wink by the pool
              1. +1
                14 December 2011 21: 16
                So you gave yourself a Moscow guest worker;)) He does not know Moldavian, at least there is a translator from your language.
                Have you ever realized that you are contacting an avatar ????
                1. that
                  -3
                  14 December 2011 21: 19
                  come I will give a shovel for snow and in the basement the Uzbeks will have a place
    2. +1
      14 December 2011 20: 56
      There are private messages for this, you can write to both other users and administrators.
      As for the assessment, you can see all the comments and posts that the user wrote earlier.
      The position of the portal is that any opinion has a place.
      Do not pay attention to "KI", so local
      1. that
        -3
        14 December 2011 21: 07
        the politicians never liked
        one was just kind of normal
        1. 0
          14 December 2011 21: 10
          I don’t know, I have never met
          1. that
            -3
            14 December 2011 21: 21
            I'm tired of you being a connoisseur of submarines from sunny Transbaikalia
  12. gambit
    0
    14 December 2011 21: 21
    MDA rod national gas all abroad new, lay pipes, No. they at least carried out the complete gasification of our country, and they still use wood-burning stoves in villages 20 km from the city
  13. 0
    14 December 2011 21: 41
    Agreeing with North Korea will be difficult. It might be easier to stretch along the bottom of the Sea of ​​Japan, from Vladivostok to Gangneung.
    1. Don
      0
      15 December 2011 18: 09
      Quote: APASUS
      Agree with North Korea will be difficult

      Well, I think it’s not in vain that Kim Jong Il recently came to Russia. Most likely agree.
  14. dred
    -1
    16 December 2011 13: 02
    Well, why did Kim Jong Il come for this?