Military Review

Opposition group Hmeymim announced its draft constitution for Syria

19
The opposition group Hmeimim developed a draft Syrian constitution, which involves the establishment of a parliamentary-presidential republic, reports RIA News statement by team leader Ilian Masaad.




Masaad said that soon “the document will be handed over to the UN special envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura.”

According to him, "it will be a mixed republic, and it will be something completely new (for Syria)."

The interlocutor explained that the elaborated constitution is temporary, however “it will help to hold parliamentary, presidential and regional elections.”

When asked whether the new constitution takes into account the interests of the Kurds, the leader of the opposition group replied that the document “refers to the Syrians as a whole, and not just the Kurds.”

“The new constitution deals with a democratic, secular state for all, which would deal with all internal problems, and the Kurds would find their place on a par with everyone. The current constitution is not sufficiently secular and democratic, ”said Masaad.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 18 March 2016 10: 21
    +18
    The current constitution is not secular and democratic enough, ”Masaad said.
    A question to representatives of the opposition: for the sake of "insufficient democratic constitution" was it worth plunging the country into the chaos of a civil war for four years and receiving tens of thousands of international terrorists on its territory as a bonus?
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 18 March 2016 10: 33
      +3
      The country was plunged into chaos by the local gopota, or majors, the elite, let’s say so .. Well, money is always small, so give POWER .. Of course, all this happened with the direct support of the fenders .. Livia is not enough for them .. Maybe ours will get things done there too? ?
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      The current constitution is not secular and democratic enough, ”Masaad said.
      A question to representatives of the opposition: for the sake of "insufficient democratic constitution" was it worth plunging the country into the chaos of a civil war for four years and receiving tens of thousands of international terrorists on its territory as a bonus?
      1. Blondy
        Blondy 18 March 2016 12: 55
        +3
        Quote: dmi.pris
        The country was plunged into chaos by the local gopota, or majors, the elite, let’s say so .. Well, money is always small, so give AUTHORITY .. Of course, all this happened with the direct support of the staff members ..

        Yes, no gopota or majors with the elite, here the stamped stamps do not pass.

        Actually, it all started with the fact that Assad did not allow Qatar and the States to draw a pipeline through Syria - since then Syria has become very undemocratic and Assad an Alawite minority who dictates his will to the religious majority. The mess itself began with the fact that the Syrian security forces launched an operation in Homs against local smugglers with cigarettes and other consumer goods from behind a mound - and ran into well-armed militants. A sufficient number of well-armed foreign guys joined the smugglers, and they showed the security forces where the crayfish hibernate. In my opinion, it was then that Assad foolishly ordered the introduction of tanks (an ophthalmologist, never a military man). Well, immediately a cry over all the western scales, such as a tyrant, a bloodsucker, a killer of civilians and small children. Urgently organized a society of incomprehensibly recruited "Friends of Syria" under whose cover in the form of opposition poured a stream of mercenaries for Qatari and Saudi money (now these "friends" have somehow disappeared somewhere). For some reason, this initial stage is modestly silent, when they analyze the beginning of the Syrian conflict, and immediately begin with all of a sudden uprisings of the "opposition" in Syrian cities and towns.

        And one more touch - one of the largest universities in the Middle East is located in Homs - it seems to be a breeding ground for oppositional opposition. But students and teachers stayed together under siege, despite the casualties, and fought the opposition until liberation. If these boys and girls, unlike, for example, Cairo or Kiev, did not join the fight against the "hated regime" then they probably knew better where these "religious-democratic converters" came from.
    2. ,
      , 18 March 2016 10: 35
      +1
      The question is off topic, whether the neighboring country was worth bombing the Donbass because of Euro integration, or to the Georgian, oh, excuse me, macho. It’s just that a normal neighbor, Russia, was standing next to him. And in Syria they did what they wanted.
      1. ,
        , 18 March 2016 10: 36
        +1
        the word chimo was stolen request
      2. Galich Kos
        Galich Kos 18 March 2016 10: 48
        +1
        Quote: andre
        The question is off topic, was it worth the neighboring country to bomb Donbass because of euro integration



        In order to draw Russia into an open war? Of course it was. Another thing is that the Russian leadership also doesn’t slurp with cabbage soup and did not fall for this chip and did not get involved in the war.
    3. Samen
      Samen 18 March 2016 11: 02
      +1
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple (4) Today, 10:21 am New
      The current constitution is not secular and democratic enough, ”Masaad said.
      A question to representatives of the opposition: for the sake of "insufficient democratic constitution" was it worth plunging the country into the chaos of a civil war for four years and receiving tens of thousands of international terrorists on its territory as a bonus?

      The answer of the opposition representative: "Not for the sake of" insufficient democratic constitution ", but
      for the sake of generously paid "ideas of the State Department" (strictly confidential)))))))
  2. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 18 March 2016 10: 22
    +5
    The main thing is that the draft constitution would not be a draft of the CIA.
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 18 March 2016 10: 25
      +2
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      The main thing is that the draft constitution would not be a draft of the CIA.

      Well, well, and the writing of the "nashenskaya" constitution was not supervised by matrasniki!
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 18 March 2016 10: 27
        +1
        With a forty-degree Ben, everything could be.
    2. Altona
      Altona 18 March 2016 10: 54
      +1
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      The main thing is that the draft constitution would not be a draft of the CIA.

      ----------------------------
      Most likely it is. Behind the beautiful formulations "presidential-parliamentary republic" there is such a huge pitfall, following the example of Egypt, when all kinds of radical jihadist parties like "Muslim Brotherhood" will pour into Parliament and begin "democratic reconstruction" against the background of a weak central executive power in the person of the president.
  3. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 18 March 2016 10: 32
    +2
    Masaad said that “the document will be transmitted to the UN special envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura. ”

    Apparently, if advisers again intervene, and from the document (be it three times good for the Syrians), there will be nothing good left. Unfortunately, I believe that everything will be done in order to maintain a source of tension.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 18 March 2016 10: 56
      +1
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Masaad said that soon “the document will be handed over to the UN special envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura.”

      What does Mistura have to do with it? The constitution, although temporary, is Syrian! So the Syrians themselves should discuss and accept it, without any special envoys (UN State Department)!
  4. Sleepwalker
    Sleepwalker 18 March 2016 10: 32
    +2
    What good news - constitutions can be written at airfields!
    We are waiting for "Guantanam" for Cuba, "Kandahar" for Afghanistan, and Germany - only Ramstein!

    That is the reason for the development of Khodynka - so as not to write what ...
    1. Uncle ho
      Uncle ho 18 March 2016 10: 39
      +1
      Quote: Lunatic
      What good news - constitutions can be written at airfields!
      We are waiting for "Guantanam" for Cuba, "Kandahar" for Afghanistan, and Germany - only Ramstein!

      That is the reason for the development of Khodynka - so as not to write what ...

      laughing score comment!
      1. alex-cn
        alex-cn 18 March 2016 10: 43
        0
        And Hmeimim - whose airbase? So the question is still that ...
      2. vanavatny
        vanavatny 18 March 2016 10: 44
        +1
        maybe our government should work under the control of machine gunners? really works hi
    2. Kunar
      Kunar 18 March 2016 10: 54
      0
      And who said that at the air base)))) The author is clearly indicated there)))) Massad)))
    3. Altona
      Altona 18 March 2016 10: 56
      0
      Quote: Lunatic
      What good news - constitutions can be written at airfields!

      ----------------------
      Constitution must be written either on the wing of an airplane or on the armor of a tank. For the Middle East, this is more than relevant, see Israel.
      1. Sleepwalker
        Sleepwalker 18 March 2016 16: 48
        0
        Yes, 93 years old - we still use tanks in the White House ... we still had a quorum and there were a lot of spectators.
        In 73, Pinochet also rewrote - like an example set.
  5. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING 18 March 2016 10: 34
    0
    The opposition group Khmeimim reported on the draft of the Syrian constitution ...
  6. pts-m
    pts-m 18 March 2016 10: 48
    +2
    And why not conduct mass writings on the topic in Syria ... What kind of Syria do I need? ... to write one by one, well and then to read. Naturally in Arabic, otherwise the penday will send their bearded “examinees”, and they write only in “ American language. "
  7. afrikanez
    afrikanez 18 March 2016 11: 27
    0
    The current constitution is not secular and democratic enough
    I wonder by what criteria does the apposition determine failure? That in their understanding is not democratic enough, it is not possible to understand at all. It’s easier to glue cliches and turn over, which is beneficial only to yourself. The absurdity of the situation is obvious. There is an incumbent president, a constitution, and this is what we need to build on.
  8. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 18 March 2016 14: 20
    0
    the developed constitution is temporary

    Did the Yankos try for the "moderates"? Can these bearded men read?
    Where should they write the constitution! Or is it just another "pirate's code" ?!
    The Burmels made fun.