Military Review

The UN Security Council did not support the draft Russian resolution on Syria

88
The UN Security Council did not agree on the Russian draft resolution on the observance of the sovereignty of Syria, the document was rejected by representatives of 6 countries, three of which have veto power, reports RIA News.




The draft resolution condemned the shelling of Syria from Turkish territory, the crossing of the border by foreign fighters, and the intervention of the military in the conflict. The document insisted on respect for the sovereignty of Syria and the abandonment of plans for a ground invasion of the country.

The draft also emphasized that "a long-term solution to the Syrian crisis can only be through an inclusive political process led by the Syrians, in accordance with Security Council resolution 2254."

The publication notes that "the United Kingdom, Spain, New Zealand, the USA, Ukraine and France spoke against the submitted version of the document."

“It is absolutely clear that this resolution will not come to anything,” said British Representative Peter Wilson after the meeting.

“Instead of distracting the world with the resolution just introduced, it would be really great if Russia implemented the already approved resolution (2254),” said US representative Samantha Power. “The emphasis should be on its implementation.”

Deputy Russian representative Vladimir Safronov, in turn, assured that "Russia is ready for further work on the project and consultations with members of the UN Security Council."

Suggestions to the document can be made on Monday.

“We have until Monday to hear the responses to this resolution,” said Venezuelan representative Rafael Ramirez. “We spent a lot of time discussing it, but we didn’t reach agreement on that.”

Halit Chevik, the representative of Turkey, who came out to journalists after the meeting, said: "We support the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria."

According to him, “the Syrian conflict has a significant impact on neighboring countries, and the threat from terrorist organizations continues to grow.” Therefore, Turkey "will not hesitate to use our right to self-defense under international law."

“Ankara will be guided by the rule of retaliation against any attack from the Syrian side,” he said. “It’s natural that we take appropriate measures in response to the YPG (Syrian Kurdish self-defense units) attack and threats from Syria.”

The diplomat also touched on the issue of the ground operation. “Turkey will not go to the Syrian land if it is not a collective action: within the framework of a Security Council resolution or an international coalition of which we are a part.” If this happens, it will be a collective, not a national operation, ”he said.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Million
    Million 20 February 2016 09: 32
    27
    Who would doubt that
    1. vkl-47
      vkl-47 20 February 2016 09: 34
      24
      the feeling that the whole world is against us. although it has always been
      1. atalef
        atalef 20 February 2016 09: 38
        0
        Quote: vkl-47
        the feeling that the whole world is against us. although it has always been

        6 countries, the USA and France did not support, who else 4, who has infa?
        1. Professor
          Professor 20 February 2016 09: 41
          20
          Quote: atalef
          6 countries, the USA and France did not support, who else 4, who has infa?

          The publication notes that “against the submitted version of the document were Great Britain, Spain, New Zealand, USA, Ukraine and France». wink
          1. Zeppelin ml.
            Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 09: 59
            15
            Quote: Professor
            Ukraine

            xoxlam didn't like the word "inclusive"
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 20 February 2016 10: 10
              10
              From the text of the article
              Turkish Ambassador Halit Chevik said:
              «Turkey will not go to Syrian land, if this is not a collective action: as part of a Security Council resolution or an international coalition of which we are a part. If this happens, then it will be COLLECTIVE, NOT national операция»

              And who after that doubts that it is Erdoganova (!) Turkey that is the “trigger” for starting the Third World (and nuclear!) War? !!! am
              1. Rus2012
                Rus2012 20 February 2016 11: 41
                +6
                Quote: Tatiana
                Turkey is the “trigger” for the start of the Third World (and nuclear!) War? !!!

                here the main thing in 3x details -
                1. Turkish Ambassador Halit Chevik said:
                “We support the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria.”

                forced to say it and it’s good!
                2. he is
                “Turkey will not go to Syrian land if this is not a collective action: within the framework of a Security Council resolution or an international coalition of which we are a part. If this happens, it will be a collective, not a national operation. ”

                the fact that Security Council resolution on the invasion will not be!
                3. if these animals decide
                either an international coalition

                then they will rest against 3MV using nuclear weapons.
                We have nowhere to retreat. Yes and no reason. Otherwise, then everything is the same, only the time-stretched cutting of the tail in parts ...
                "Sometimes you need to hit first!" (C) VVP
              2. vladimirw
                vladimirw 20 February 2016 12: 26
                0
                I absolutely agree that the Turks are trying to smuggle something into the UN to legally smash the Kurds and Assad’s troops. Something like a Korean war
                1. Darkmor
                  Darkmor 20 February 2016 20: 00
                  +1
                  Do not think that our diplomats did not understand what the vote for the resolution would be.
                  Most likely the meaning was precisely in this result:
                  Turkey was kept on a leash by its own allies for some time, so that the incident would not come out, as if Turkey had been given carte blanche for a military operation after the vote.

                  Those. we, figuratively speaking, linked further actions of Turkey with those who voted against the resolution. We said - "either you keep your vassal on a leash, or take a thicker leash from us" They said: "No, we can handle it ourselves - our vassal is good, trained and does not bite without a command."
                  After such a choice, you can’t get away that Turkey acted independently and other blah blah blah.

                  Apparently, our expect to take Aleppo during this time.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. Snake AAA
            Snake AAA 20 February 2016 10: 00
            10
            Play damn, it smells like a big hassle, the Turks can provoke! And brazenly Saxons are always at war grelimlya hands! It’s a pity you can’t swear, mats just ask :(!
            1. Misha Honest
              Misha Honest 20 February 2016 10: 54
              +2
              We are preparing for war - for a long time, after all, I already speak about this ...
              1. Zeppelin ml.
                Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 11: 26
                0
                Quote: Misha Honest
                We are preparing for war - for a long time, after all, I already speak about this ...

                and they didn’t listen to such a person! Oh no no no...
                1. vladimirw
                  vladimirw 20 February 2016 12: 30
                  0
                  What sashniki hope to sit out over the puddle? I think it won’t work out, this time they will receive a gift on their territory and there will be a strait between Mexico and Canada!
                2. Misha Honest
                  Misha Honest 20 February 2016 23: 44
                  0
                  Quote: Zeppelin ml.
                  and they didn’t listen to such a person! Oh no no no...

                  Alas hi
            2. Rus2012
              Rus2012 20 February 2016 11: 47
              +5
              Quote: Serpent AAA
              Turks can provoke!

              ... probably won't happen. There may be a brave one who will shoot a "mad dog".

              There is hope. Read here -

              Interesting news. If you believe the information that appeared on the network, then from the 28 Turkish soldiers who died on February 17 either during the explosion of a large air conditioner, or during self-shelling (after all, their Ukrainian siblings love to write that way), 22 people are military pilots.

              Xnumx Military Pilot, Carl. They died a terrible death, burned alive in buses: Terrorist attack in Turkey. Modern terrorism commits terrorist acts, choosing victims arbitrarily. He hits easy targets, striving for the maximum number of victims - this gives a greater resonance in the media. The military and police are difficult targets. Therefore, terrorists almost always choose civilians as an object of attack.

              When the military, and even highly qualified ones, are targeted like this, it’s not called a terrorist attack, but a sabotage. This is part of the hostilities, and military professionals are involved.

              We can assume that this is a response from the Kurdish workers' party for the Turkish bombing. Well, or from someone else regarding whom Turkish pilots violated unwritten rules of conduct.

              http://topru.org/35048/nezhdanchik-priletel/
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. Vadim-Skeptic
            Vadim-Skeptic 20 February 2016 10: 33
            +1
            I believe that the draft of our resolution is a pure provocation. And the states could not help but get into it.
          5. mikh-korsakov
            mikh-korsakov 20 February 2016 12: 38
            +2
            The UN Security Council has 15 members. so I would like to know who the other nine countries are. Therefore, whining that we are alone is irrelevant. However, I admit. that of the remaining nine, most abstained. because they are afraid of the intrigues of their "elder brother", and not because they, in fact, do not understand the justice of the Russian resolution.
        2. askort154
          askort154 20 February 2016 09: 59
          12
          atalef ..... 6 countries, the USA and France did not support, who else is the 4th, who has infa?

          A poorly read article? There are not many letters in it. hi
          1. The comment was deleted.
        3. Lelek
          Lelek 20 February 2016 10: 05
          +6
          Quote: atalef
          6 countries, the USA and France did not support, who else 4, who has infa?


          Read the full article, not the title and summary. yes
          1. atalef
            atalef 20 February 2016 10: 08
            +5
            Quote: Lelek
            Quote: atalef
            6 countries, the USA and France did not support, who else 4, who has infa?


            Read the full article, not the title and summary. yes

            C'mon, it's good to get hungry already, Chukchi is not a reader, Chukchi is a writer laughing
            1. aleks 62 next
              aleks 62 next 20 February 2016 10: 12
              +4
              .... C'mon, it’s good to be already hungry, the Chukchi is not a reader, the Chukchi writer is laughing

              .... Do not take Sasha in the head ... But read carefully !!!! .... laughing
              1. unsinkable
                unsinkable 20 February 2016 12: 09
                -2
                Quote: aleks 62 next
                ..Do not take Sash in the head

                Man, plus I put you, because. You are right, you do not need to pay attention to spiteful critics. But you also do not need to provoke a pun: * Do not take it ... Into the head, but take it in p .... hi
            2. Chisayna
              Chisayna 20 February 2016 10: 35
              -3
              Yes, that's just anti-Chukchism in Russia and in the world. And there is more than enough anti-Semitism.
        4. Homo
          Homo 20 February 2016 11: 27
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          6 countries, the USA and France did not support, who else 4, who has infa?

          And again the same rake! Have you even read the article to the end? Do not read the article, but comment. What for? Amount of stuffing? Are you collecting stars for epaulets?
      2. forester
        forester 20 February 2016 09: 44
        12
        Quote: vkl-47
        the feeling that the whole world is against us. although it has always been

        And Us-Rat))))
        1. Mihalich17
          Mihalich17 20 February 2016 09: 50
          +8
          Supporters of gas weapons have been arguing for a long time, what is more effective - a gas key or a piece of gas pipe?
      3. The black
        The black 20 February 2016 09: 46
        14
        Of course, who would doubt that support for the legitimate government is a dead end. The correct position is to support "moderate terrorists". laughing
      4. iConst
        iConst 20 February 2016 10: 03
        +2
        Quote: vkl-47
        the feeling that the whole world is against us. although it has always been

        ... "the United Kingdom, Spain, New Zealand, the USA, Ukraine and France opposed the presented version of the document"

        - Good, and the rest:
        Angola, Venezuela, Egypt, Malaysia, Senegal, Uruguay, Japan.

        Plus a permanent China? Just nine. Abstained?

        The article is silent about this.
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 20 February 2016 10: 08
          +6
          The publication notes that “the United Kingdom, Spain, New Zealand, the USA, opposed the presented version of the document, Ukraine and France. "

          Ukraine: "And I, and I! And I have the same opinion!" (M \ f Winnie the Pooh ...) laughing
          1. dvg1959
            dvg1959 20 February 2016 10: 31
            0
            And we will go north, and we will go north.
        2. Corsair
          Corsair 20 February 2016 10: 29
          0
          Quote: iConst
          - Good, and the rest:
          Angola, Venezuela, Egypt, Malaysia, Senegal, Uruguay, Japan.

          Plus a permanent China? Just nine. Abstained?

          The article is silent about this.

          And what's the difference - even one or two can impose a veto. USA, France directly participants. Ukrainians themselves do not decide anything. Spain which side? They promised loans to them or just a deflection to the United States?
          And New Zealand why it is not clear, the Anglopithecus ordered?
          1. atalef
            atalef 20 February 2016 10: 38
            +7
            Quote: Corsair
            And New Zealand why it is not clear, the Anglopithecus ordered?

            Position obliges
            In New Zealand, a country of 268 680 square kilometers (including all islands and islets) and 4,3 million people (including tourists and illegal immigrants) currently resides
            33,9 million sheep
            9,7 million cows (5,6 million dairy and 4,1 million meat)
            Xnumx million deer
            1. alex-s
              alex-s 20 February 2016 11: 11
              +2
              In my opinion, to Ukraine also suitable: with a population of 43 million people (including tourists and illegal immigrants) currently lives
              33,9 million sheep
              1,2 million deer.
            2. Great-grandfather of Zeus
              Great-grandfather of Zeus 20 February 2016 11: 24
              +1
              Atalef I don’t know how many sheep there are in New Zealand, but in the United Nations there were at least six ...
            3. corporal
              corporal 20 February 2016 12: 33
              +1
              Quote: atalef
              In New Zealand ... with a population of 4,3 million ... currently residing
              33,9 million sheep .......
              Xnumx million deer

              good good laughing laughing wassat
              Great! Laughing heartily.
              I'll take it to memorize.
      5. Vadim-Skeptic
        Vadim-Skeptic 20 February 2016 10: 30
        -2
        I believe that the draft of our resolution is a pure provocation. And the states could not help but get into it.
      6. askort154
        askort154 20 February 2016 12: 27
        0
        vkl-47 ... the feeling that the whole world is against us. although it has always been so.

        You're not right! Never "the whole world" was against us!
        There were coalitions against us, and only the western ones (in the east only Japan), and this is far from "the whole world".
    2. kot28.ru
      kot28.ru 20 February 2016 09: 34
      13
      Naglosaksa and their satellites, the decision is expected! am
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 20 February 2016 09: 42
        0
        Exactly!
        Quote: Turkish Permanent Representative Halit Chevik
        ... If this happens, it will be a collective, not a national operation ”
        That's what it all boils down to! Cunning! The USA is already there, so their Turkoblohas must be with them!
        So let’s drink so that no one will ever come off the team! drinks
    3. Vend
      Vend 20 February 2016 09: 36
      +6
      Quote: Million
      Who would doubt that

      After some time, the mattresses will issue exactly the same offer. It’s like for the cessation of hostilities in the Donbass. Russia talked about this from the very beginning, and then the mattresses gave the Russian proposal for their own. The Syrians need a little patience. What can I do mattresses continue to play the world leader laughing
    4. vlad66
      vlad66 20 February 2016 09: 38
      18
      Quote: Million
      Who would doubt that

      Nobody doubts that it will be so, the USA and their sixes will naturally not miss a document from Russia, the situation is getting too hot unfortunately.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 20 February 2016 09: 44
        +4
        “Turkey will not go to Syrian land if this is not a collective action: within the framework of a Security Council resolution either an international coalitionof which we are a part. If this happens, it will be a collective, not a national operation, ”he said.

        “Within the framework of the international coalition,” does that mean, together with the Saudis, the Turks can still attack Syria? Here the bastards, they already openly say that Turkey will enter Syria! So we do not need to harbor illusions about a possible peaceful solution to this issue. You need to prepare - and prepare seriously.
      2. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 20 February 2016 09: 51
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        who has infa?
        Well, here in this article there is a line that:Great Britain, Spain, New Zealand, USA, Ukraine and France. ”. In short, 6 powerful powers opposed our resolution. Oh, no, 5! N. Zealand doesn’t count --- she is a member of the British Commonwealth, and as the English queen orders her --- so she gets upset. The rest of the villains are not jerboas in world politics and are part of NATO. Well, almost all are not jerboas.)) )
      3. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 20 February 2016 10: 50
        14
        Quote: vlad66
        Nobody doubts that it will be so, the USA and their sixes will naturally not miss a document from Russia, the situation is getting too hot unfortunately.

        Yes, with the sixes, then everything is clear. Here is another annoying. Logically, the UN must defend the integrity and sovereignty of any country, even Syria, even Vanuatu, this should not be questioned a priori.
        If 6 cranks vote against the resolution on the preservation of sovereignty and the ban on conducting land operations and this is taken as a basis, then what is the point in the work of the UN? Give legitimacy to the occupation? In fact, these 6 countries also should not be opposed in the event of hostilities against them?
        There, the owner is not Ban Ki-moon, but this fury Power
    5. The black
      The black 20 February 2016 09: 45
      +8
      Everyone understands the behavior of the States, Britain and those like Ukraine. No one counted on anything else, but Russia honestly acted within the framework of international norms and if Syria's sovereignty is questioned, and if intervention becomes possible, then the entire world order is "bursting at the seams."
      1. atalef
        atalef 20 February 2016 09: 57
        -11 qualifying.
        Quote: Black
        how Ukraine understands

        Quote: Black
        but Russia has honestly acted within the framework of international norms and if the sovereignty of Syria is questioned, and if intervention becomes possible, then the whole world order is "bursting at the seams"

        Yes, some dissonance.
        The sovereignty of Ukraine is interesting in Russia - is it perceived unambiguously?
        So what do you expect from her (Ukraine) in response?
        1. The black
          The black 20 February 2016 10: 03
          17
          The sovereignty of Ukraine is interesting in Russia - is it perceived unambiguously?
          And what, did any of the officials of our state talk about not recognizing its sovereignty? wink
          So what do you expect from her (Ukraine) in response?
          Yes, recently, apart from hemorrhoids, nothing ... request
          1. Zeppelin ml.
            Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 10: 05
            -2
            Quote: Black
            And what, did any of the officials of our state talk about not recognizing its sovereignty?

            no. But "krymnash".
            1. The black
              The black 20 February 2016 10: 13
              10
              no. But "krymnash".
              And Crimea has always been ours smile ... Yes, and from the point of view of international law, its entry into the Russian Federation was legal ... did you know you wanted (in a referendum) ... the United States did not bother the separation of Kosovo from Serbia? (even without a referendum) smile
              1. Zeppelin ml.
                Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 10: 24
                -1
                Quote: Black
                ..Yes, and from the point of view of international law, its entry into the Russian Federation was legal ...

                this is a view from our side. I am simply addressing the issue of sovereignty, integrity and integrity. Any of our initiatives in geopolitics will (including) come across a Crimean counterargument.
                1. The black
                  The black 20 February 2016 10: 33
                  +6
                  Any of our initiatives in geopolitics will (including) come across a Crimean counterargument.
                  .... They would have come across anyway, with and without Crimea .... Where was international law and our arguments before the Crimea? ... When Belgrade was bombed, Libya, Iraq, Kosovo were taken from the Serbs, etc. ... Was there a UN resolution? They listened to us? ...
                  1. Zeppelin ml.
                    Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 10: 39
                    -2
                    Quote: Black
                    TO CRIMEA? ... When Belgrade was bombed, Libya, Iraq, Kosovo .... they listened to us? ...
                    bad retrospective. For ethical reasons, I do not name the place where the language of our diplomacy was during the time of Yugoslavia. Yes, and Libya, too.
                    1. The black
                      The black 20 February 2016 15: 38
                      +2
                      bad retrospective. For ethical reasons, I do not name the place where the language of our diplomacy was during the time of Yugoslavia. Yes, and Libya, too.
                      What are you talking about? Just the same, our diplomats were not silent, but only when there is no real power behind their backs, all their words are like a voice in the desert ...
          2. atalef
            atalef 20 February 2016 10: 21
            -5
            Quote: Black
            And what, did any of the officials of our state talk about not recognizing its sovereignty?

            Of course, they recognize, and the Budapest memorandum was framed and diplomatic relations exist and Poroshenko’s legitimacy is not in dispute.
            only here is Crimea, New Russia and the Junta, the North Wind and Voentorg.
            In Syria, the same eggs, only in profile. Only the sides changed places
            1. KaPToC
              KaPToC 20 February 2016 10: 28
              +1
              Quote: atalef
              In Syria, the same eggs, only in profile. Only the sides changed places

              Russia beats the enemy in his field, nothing personal, it was you who came up with such methods of war, you, not us.
            2. The black
              The black 20 February 2016 10: 29
              +8
              only here is Crimea
              About Crimea answered the post above
              New Russia and the Junta
              , and in Syria, the lawfully elected president and criminals from around the world (igil)
              North wind and Voentorg.
              You forgot about the other side: American loot and cookies ... smile ............ I understand what you mean. What are these parallels for. But the conclusion is what? .. I think that the conclusion is simple - there is no international law in the world, there is a strong law. And if you are weak, then they will devour you.
              1. atalef
                atalef 20 February 2016 10: 36
                -3
                Quote: Black
                ro crimea answered post above

                Turks will say that Northern Syria has always been theirs and almost all Turkoman have Turkish citizenship
                Quote: Black
                and in Syria, the lawfully elected president and criminals from around the world (igil)

                In Ukraine, the lawfully elected president, and in Novorosia, a militia from around the world
                Quote: Black
                You forgot about the other side: American loot and cookies ..

                Assad does not receive them?
                Quote: Black
                I understand what you mean. Why are these parallels

                Because equally
                Quote: Black
                I think that the conclusion is simple - there is no international law in the world, there is a strong right. And if you are weak, then they will devour you.

                But with this I absolutely agree with you.
                And appealing to international law (who would explain to me what it is) is useless here.
                The USA, Russia, Turkey, etc. - defend their interests, and the rest is empty rhetoric and appealing to the law is simply ridiculous, since all parties perfectly violate it.
                1. Zeppelin ml.
                  Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 11: 02
                  +1
                  Sasha, you have a pointless argument, I think. From the standards in the eyes of doubles.
                  1. atalef
                    atalef 20 February 2016 11: 18
                    -2
                    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
                    Sasha, you have a pointless argument, I think. From the standards in the eyes of doubles.

                    Alas!
                    good morning !!! hi
                    1. Zeppelin ml.
                      Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 11: 28
                      -1
                      Quote: atalef
                      good morning !!!

                      Salute, namesake.
                2. corporal
                  corporal 20 February 2016 12: 40
                  +1
                  Quote: atalef
                  Turks will say that Northern Syria has always been theirs and almost all Turkoman have Turkish citizenship

                  By the way, I already wondered what if the Turks held a referendum among the Turkomans according to the Crimean scenario, how should we respond then ?? what And you don’t formally dig.
                3. The black
                  The black 20 February 2016 15: 43
                  +1
                  Assad does not receive them?
                  Is Assad preparing a coup? laughing
                  In Ukraine, the lawfully elected president,
                  Since when has the seizure of power by means of a coup d'etat become legal?
                  and in Novorosiya, a militia from around the world
                  That is, you put an equal sign between the militias and the ghoul-terrorists raping, cutting off their heads, etc. ..... well, so you can agree to what extent ...
            3. Black
              Black 20 February 2016 10: 53
              +7
              Quote: atalef
              In Syria, the same eggs, only in profile.

              And the Dutch heights, Beirut .... what kind of eggs, from what angle ???
              1. atalef
                atalef 20 February 2016 10: 55
                -2
                Quote: Chen
                And the Dutch heights

                Syria started the war, lost and lost territory --- what is the problem?
                Quote: Chen
                Beirut..

                What about Beirut? We captured it the same?
              2. Zeppelin ml.
                Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 10: 59
                +4
                Quote: Chen
                And the Dutch heights

                and what is wrong with Holland?
                1. atalef
                  atalef 20 February 2016 11: 17
                  +1
                  Quote: Zeppelin ml.
                  Quote: Chen
                  And the Dutch heights

                  and what is wrong with Holland?

                  Yes, something I’m exclusively not attentive today, I didn’t see the country 4, I didn’t see Holland No.
                  Getting older sad
                  1. The comment was deleted.
    6. sherp2015
      sherp2015 20 February 2016 10: 22
      +5
      Quote: Million
      Who would doubt that


      then the pack is preparing to get into Syria under some false pretext
    7. xavbek7
      xavbek7 20 February 2016 21: 56
      0
      and if we don’t believe, why do we need it? you have to go out.
  2. Dangerous
    Dangerous 20 February 2016 09: 33
    15
    And Ukraine is right there. What kind of people are henchmen
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 20 February 2016 09: 43
      14
      Quote: Dangerous
      And Ukraine is right there. What kind of people are henchmen

      Why is it here, now they are exactly the same six of the West, like the same Washington-Baltic room dog, who barks louder at Russia at the direction of the United States and licks his ass cleaner than mattresses, he will get a little money, that is, a bone. hi
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 20 February 2016 10: 08
        10
        Quote: vlad66
        What kind of people are henchmen


        Govnomety.
    2. Jarilo
      Jarilo 20 February 2016 09: 56
      +6
      It’s even good that Ukraine is there. She mentally delimitizes the whole company.
    3. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 20 February 2016 10: 01
      +1
      Quote: Dangerous
      What kind of people
      They are expecting attacks on Father Snake from day to day, and now they are taking revenge. Swede Aaron explained this to him ....wassat :
      The naval forces together with the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine have strengthened the protection of the Snake island, which is part of the Kiliysky district of Odessa region.
      Additional security measures were taken "in case of a possible complication of the situation." On February 13, ships, boats and aircraft of the Navy and the STAU maneuvered around the island. Also, a unit of the Marine Corps of the Navy with heavy weapons landed on Snake Island, which will remain there until the situation stabilizes.
      Odessa border guards, together with the command of the Navy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, carried out a practical test of readiness and training to act in case of complication of the situation around about. Serpentine.
      This was reported by the press center of the State Border Service of Ukraine.
      Snake - an island in the Black Sea, belongs to Ukraine and defines its territorial waters. The island has a cruciform shape, the area is 20,5 hectares, and the distance between the extreme points is 615 and 560 meters. The population is 100 people. The distance to Odessa is 120 km.
      The leadership of the General Staff of Ukraine has taken a number of measures to strengthen the protection of the island in connection with possible threat from the Russian Federation. Earlier, Advisor to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sweden Aaron Koreva noted the ability to capture the island in order to control the water arteries that lead to Odessa.http://military-informant.com/analytic/ukraina-usilila-ohranu-ostrova-zmeinyiy-v


      -chernom-more.html
  3. PKK
    PKK 20 February 2016 09: 38
    +4
    But Germany was silent. I tasted the policies of England and the USA according to the tonsils, there is no voice yet, but we thought it over well.
    1. sir.jonn
      sir.jonn 20 February 2016 09: 43
      +9
      Quote: PKK
      But Germany was silent. I tasted the policies of England and the USA according to the tonsils, there is no voice yet, but we thought it over well.


      Germany is not a member of the UN Security Council
      1. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 10: 01
        +1
        Quote: sir.jonn
        Quote: PKK
        But Germany was silent. I tasted the policies of England and the USA according to the tonsils, there is no voice yet, but we thought it over well.


        Germany is not a member of the UN Security Council

        Of particular interest is the position of Chad laughing
        1. Misha Honest
          Misha Honest 20 February 2016 10: 51
          0
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          Of particular interest is the position of Chad

          Most likely they started - as usual. laughing
  4. izya top
    izya top 20 February 2016 09: 38
    +3
    and who was expecting another request
  5. dummy
    dummy 20 February 2016 09: 42
    +4
    Bright Elves and vile orcs are against humans as always. Here, even Sauron is not necessary. Only after all, people still live, and there are no more elves or orcs. When does the cross between arrogance and ukrov die?
  6. Gray 43
    Gray 43 20 February 2016 09: 42
    +7
    But for the invasion would have voted with applause-two-faced anus
  7. Huan karlos
    Huan karlos 20 February 2016 09: 43
    +3
    rags, nothing else was to be expected
  8. Engineer
    Engineer 20 February 2016 09: 43
    17
    Q.E.D. So it is necessary to hammer and hammer these freaks in Syria to the bitter end. Nobody wants to negotiate with anyone. Nobody cares about sovereignty and all legal acts. The UN is a screen for a "civilized" world without any real powers. Nobody cares about her and her charter. Therefore, we must clearly declare to the whole world that only our military have the right to be on the territory of Syria. Only our planes can fly there. All other aircraft will be considered enemy aircraft and will be shot down without warning. Any entry of troops that are not part of the coalition of the Syrian Army and the Russian Federation will be considered an attack on an independent state. It's time to bang your fists on the table and say hands off Syria! Now is a turning point for our country's status on the world stage - or we will see it through to the end and make everyone respect us (and love us never will not) or let's go about the West, merge everything and again we will ... will not put!
  9. lukewarm
    lukewarm 20 February 2016 09: 44
    +6
    There sobsno from 6 countries 3-4 have sovereignty. But in reality - 2. The United States and Britons are spinning to everyone.
  10. Ros 56
    Ros 56 20 February 2016 09: 45
    +6
    The publication notes that "the United Kingdom, Spain, New Zealand, the USA, Ukraine and France spoke against the submitted version of the document."

    Who would doubt that they would vote like that, because they are all tied up there, except for N.Zelandii and Ukraine. Well, the latter are understandable, they will even vote to put them in cancer, there is no doubt about that. So everything is predictable. The field of activity for diplomats is open.
    In the meantime, all this turbulence continues, it is necessary to beat, beat and beat the terrorists, the less it remains, the less then there will be less trouble with them. We did not finish Bendera in due time, now we are reaping the benefits. During his life he was convinced that everything must be brought to the end. It doesn’t matter whether it’s right or not, but it is necessary to the end, otherwise it will later come back to life, and not always from the best side.
  11. bear
    bear 20 February 2016 09: 47
    +3
    that "the United Kingdom, Spain, New Zealand, the USA, Ukraine and France opposed the presented version of the document."

    The United States, Small Britain is understandable, and Ukraine and New Zealand are so extras.
  12. askort154
    askort154 20 February 2016 09: 49
    +3
    "..Turkey will not go to Syrian soil if it is not a collective action ..."
    said the diplomat.


    NATO has already refused to support Turkey in the military confrontation with Russia, as stated by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Luxembourg. NATO will consider the issue of military protection of a NATO member country in the event that a real act of aggression is shown against that country, he said in a statement following a meeting of NATO foreign ministers. Qatar also refused to participate in the ground operation in Syria. So Erdogan remained only paired with the Saudis. Therefore, except for "dirtying" the borders of Syria, he will not dare to do more.
  13. Victor-M
    Victor-M 20 February 2016 09: 52
    +9
    By not adopting a resolution, the West creates a dangerous precedent for itself, in which any opposition in any Western country will also have the right to assert its right to power with arms in hand, while being called a moderate opposition, and interested countries will be able to freely invade the country covered by unrest and help one side or another of the conflict, and NATO will not help here. I will not be surprised that a parade of revolutions will soon begin in Western Europe.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 20 February 2016 10: 30
      +2
      No, each situation is treated individually. If the rebels are beneficial to the World Community in the person of the USA and Co., they are moderate and the government should leave. If the rebels are not beneficial to the World Community in the person of the USA and Co., then they do not represent the interests of the people and the state has the right to use force against them, as well as ask for help from other states in suppressing the uprising.

      Therefore, nothing will change.
  14. Hooks
    Hooks 20 February 2016 09: 52
    -1
    Now we can say - we tried to solve the issue by diplomacy. I hope the Syrians will soon sniff their tails to the rats across the border.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 10: 09
      0
      Quote: Hooks
      I hope the Syrians will soon sniff their tails to the rats across the border.

      faint hope. What exactly are the Syrians? SAR? Nonsense, Assad does not even control a piece of that territory. Kurds? Will the "pinch" consist in guerrilla warfare in the SE and terrorist attacks in Ankara? I don't think we are talking about SSA?
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 20 February 2016 10: 35
      +2
      This is a task for years to come.

      Success in Aleppo was achieved by cutting 30 km of the site in a narrow direction. A small-scale operation compared to what else awaits. Look at the map, but at least on Vicki, it is not objective in particulars, but gives a general position of forces. The whole Idlib will have to be cleaned, and there Nusra, a mass of broads squeezed out from Aleppo and direct feed of Turkey through an extended border.

      It is necessary to close the border of Jordan, the benefit of the broads there has almost been cut.
      1. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 20 February 2016 10: 44
        0
        Quote: donavi49
        It is necessary to close the border of Jordan

        Assad has no resources to keep the borders locked. His perimeter was and will remain full of holes. The term "Syrian-Turkish border" is rather arbitrary. And the Kurds are generally regarded as Kurdish-Turkish.
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 20 February 2016 10: 51
          +1
          So it is about blocking main roads at least, closing border warehouses. Felling and tantrums go for Azaz, because there is the largest warehouse of good. It was packaged there and sent individually, that IG, that Nusra, that Ahrar, that moderate.

          If you do this, the supply will fall by an order. It's enough. If someone drives a TOU truck along the roads, this is nothing, because now these TOU are transporting convoys of trucks with columns of trucks, they are packing up at the border points to the broads. Now, again, the ATGM faucet was opened and more pressure was added. Babahs spend TOU even on tents and single soldiers.
  15. salad
    salad 20 February 2016 09: 53
    0
    All this rabble is simply assembled fictitiously, well, so as to show everyone their "concern" well, they sat down and talked and they are not going to leave their business.
  16. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 20 February 2016 09: 53
    +3
    The presented version of the document was opposed by the United Kingdom, Spain, New Zealand, USA, Ukraine and France.


    Mattresses and arrogant Saxons are eternal enemies, Hollande licked once again. Why Spain refused to support, I don’t know, and the rest is just a husk, which hopes for scraps from the master's table.
  17. BOB044
    BOB044 20 February 2016 09: 54
    +3
    The UN Security Council did not support the draft Russian resolution on Syria
    They would be glad if Russia left Syria. What can you expect from them another.
  18. Victor-M
    Victor-M 20 February 2016 09: 58
    +1
    The U.S. Air Force Command announced an urgent withdrawal from its war zone in Syria of its strategic bombers.

    If the West withdraws its units from the conflict zone, do not expect anything good, like Georgia, trained by NATO, before attacking Tskhinval. It seems that ISIS will soon have air defense systems and MANPADS.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 20 February 2016 10: 47
      +2
      Ministers are already talking about this openly.
      Riyadh is considering the possibility of supplying missiles to the Syrian opposition

      RIA News

      Missile supplies ground-to-air moderate Syrian opposition may change the alignment of forces in Syria, said Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Adele al-Jubair.


      MANPADS will help weakly, everyone will simply climb to 5km and will throw cast iron even more actively.

      Everyone has Rapiers MK2 - an oak complex, quite simple and more effective than MANPADS, for it takes 5500 altitude and 11km range capture 8km launch.

      Qatar can send what Roland. But this is already quite obvious.
  19. Neophyte
    Neophyte 20 February 2016 10: 03
    +3
    With each victory against ISIS terrorists, the coalition of Anglo-Saxons and Ottomans in the UN will grow, demanding an end to military operations! Hey? "Refugees" in Europe? Is it time to hold the next demarches in the EU, to orientate the "Europolitician" against ISIS or for ISIS?
  20. The black
    The black 20 February 2016 10: 07
    +4
    "US Permanent Representative to the UN Samantha Power said that the Russian project has no future."
    That is, according to the United States, the future of the "Middle East is associated with terrorists?" smile
  21. Scout
    Scout 20 February 2016 10: 08
    +2
    who would doubt it, but those who supported it were also enough
  22. Victor-M
    Victor-M 20 February 2016 10: 10
    0
    The UN Security Council did not support the draft Russian resolution on Syria

    It is said loudly, although it would have to be said that six members of the UN Security Council did not support.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 20 February 2016 10: 38
      +1
      With the right veto, and one is enough. The UN is blocked altogether. Obama hinted at night, saying that Turkey has the right to self-defense and the United States will support a key ally.
  23. uskrabut
    uskrabut 20 February 2016 10: 18
    +1
    First, you need to start to shoot foreign aircraft. then shugan the Turks from the border, so that 50 km from the border, no howitzers of theirs and other shooting would be. Well, do not forget about the UN Security Council, formidable little papers tossed in there every other day
  24. dvg1959
    dvg1959 20 February 2016 10: 21
    +1
    Great Britain, Spain, New Zealand, USA, Ukraine and France. Ba - all the same faces. Nothing new. Tired of this triviality.
  25. AlexTires
    AlexTires 20 February 2016 10: 21
    +1
    If the UN Security Council refuses to sign a document on the sovereignty of the country, then the aggressors are sitting in it ...
  26. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 20 February 2016 10: 32
    +1
    new zealand did not support...... everything can be curtailed. We leave Syria.
  27. Free Cossack
    Free Cossack 20 February 2016 10: 40
    +1
    Nothing unusual, everything was clear anyway. "Double standards" have not been canceled, and the proposals of Russia will certainly be boycotted by the United States, and it does not matter what Russia offers.
  28. Mixweb
    Mixweb 20 February 2016 10: 47
    +1
    The UN has long been a toy in Washington's hands. Russian resolutions are not adopted purely on principle, no matter how wise they are. If American resolutions are not adopted, thanks to Russia and China, the Americans will still act according to their plans. Why won't Russia start acting according to its interests? Should the opinion of the "world community" stop us? I am sure that WE DO NOT OWN ANYTHING to this very community. Moreover, the West has already drunk so much blood from Russia that NOW THEY MUST US!
    1. atalef
      atalef 20 February 2016 10: 54
      0
      Quote: Mixweb
      The UN has long been a toy in the hands of Washington. Russian resolutions are not adopted purely out of principle, no matter how wise they are

      Well, actually, the Russian Federation has the same VETO right.
      Quote: Mixweb
      If American resolutions are not accepted, thanks to Russia and China, then the Americans will act according to their plans anyway

      Like Russia - who generally looks at the UN?
      Quote: Mixweb
      I am sure that WE DO NOT NEED ANYTHING for this very community. Moreover, the West has already drunk so much blood from Russia that NOW THEY ARE FOR US!

      Nobody owes anything to anyone, and everyone follows their interests.
  29. atamankko
    atamankko 20 February 2016 10: 51
    0
    Another spit on the grave of international law from the striped and their footmen.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 20 February 2016 11: 10
    +1
    Well. We won some more time. At least until Monday. And there, you see, again we will not reach consensus. Again, we will amend, hold consultations, move the meeting, etc. All in the best traditions of the European bureaucracy. Time works for us. While they knead clay there at the UN, Syria is on the verge of victory.
    Respect and respect for our Foreign Ministry.
  32. dison
    dison 20 February 2016 11: 13
    0
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Quote: vlad66
    Nobody doubts that it will be so, the USA and their sixes will naturally not miss a document from Russia, the situation is getting too hot unfortunately.

    Yes, with the sixes, then everything is clear. Here is another annoying. Logically, the UN must defend the integrity and sovereignty of any country, even Syria, even Vanuatu, this should not be questioned a priori.
    If 6 cranks vote against the resolution on the preservation of sovereignty and the ban on conducting land operations and this is taken as a basis, then what is the point in the work of the UN? Give legitimacy to the occupation? In fact, these 6 countries also should not be opposed in the event of hostilities against them?
    There, the owner is not Ban Ki-moon, but this fury Power



    It seems that only Samantha is worse!
  33. niki233
    niki233 20 February 2016 12: 33
    0
    It seems to me that the decisions of the council showed who is hu.
  34. alicante11
    alicante11 20 February 2016 12: 37
    0
    “Turkey will not go to Syrian land if this is not a collective action: within the framework of a Security Council resolution or an international coalition of which we are a part. If this happens, it will be a collective, not a national operation, ”he said.


    In other words, a single-handed point "bench press".
  35. mr.grin19z
    mr.grin19z 20 February 2016 15: 08
    0
    Yes, these cockerels were always against Russia, who would doubt their opinion
  36. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 20 February 2016 16: 57
    0
    Deputy Russian representative Vladimir Safronov, in turn, assured that "Russia is ready for further work on the project and consultations with members of the UN Security Council."

    This is unthinkable! Our diplomats can only sympathize: after all, even if there is support for the majority of the Security Council members, the three permanent Security Council members - with the right of Veto - we, of course, cannot overpower. Unfortunately ...
  37. PValery53
    PValery53 20 February 2016 17: 26
    0
    Since the bandyugans in Syria "have everything under control" even at the UN, then the language of destructive power will be absolutely understandable for them.