The White House is disappointed: Moscow does not want to share the views of the West on the situation in Syria

64
Washington is disappointed with the actions of Moscow, which does not share the goals of the coalition in the anti-terrorist operation in Syria, reports RIA News statement by White House spokesman Josh Ernest.

The White House is disappointed: Moscow does not want to share the views of the West on the situation in Syria


“We have already said that the Russians have the opportunity, if they are ready to subscribe to the goals of the international anti-ISIS coalition, which includes 65 or 66 members, to contribute to these efforts, and we will welcome this. The Russians opposed this. Because of this resistance, they decided to take a series of unilateral steps, ”said a spokesman for the administration.

“We are disappointed with the military actions (of Russia), which are not coordinated with the international coalition, as well as the fact that Russia's military actions are not focused on IS, but on supporting the Assad regime. The result is more bloodshed and suffering, which undermines the stated political goals of the Russian government, ”
he noted.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +44
    19 February 2016 11: 56
    Is the White House disappointed?
    Did they really hope for something?
    Did they expect something different? Strange people.
    Half a year later, Chingachguk noticed that the barn did not have one wall (tse).

    I hope this is not their last disappointment.
    1. +17
      19 February 2016 12: 00
      Washington is disappointed by the actions of Moscow, which does not share the goals of the coalition
      What are the goals ?! We have one goal - IS and others like them! And you?
      Were these freaks out.
      Again disappointed, worried, offended, ... as usual!
      On the offended, we say - they carry water, and they also engage in abuse of the offended!
      So we put on your fears and disappointments!
      1. +16
        19 February 2016 12: 06
        our goal is not ISIS, our goal is to preserve the territorial integrity of Syria in the form of secular state.
        1. +8
          19 February 2016 12: 12
          Let the United States look at its "face" of double standards in the political mirror and answer its own question! Is it possible that someone in their right mind and memory will trust such a deceitful old "r.o.j.e"? !!
          1. +6
            19 February 2016 12: 36
            They would have walked through the forest, late, we came and will do what we promised.
            1. 0
              19 February 2016 13: 32
              It would be possible to share any goals, if you know which ones. Otherwise, you can't understand them. They think one thing, say another (and all in different ways), and do the third. We would have decided already. And Russia has one goal - to destroy terrorism and preserve the state of Syria.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          19 February 2016 12: 37
          Quote: just explo
          preserving the territorial integrity of Syria as a secular state

          This will be a natural consequence of the destruction of terrorists (IS, Nusra and other ash-shams and al-Islam) and the expulsion of the "coalition" invaders (Turks + Saud) from the territory of Syria.
        3. +1
          19 February 2016 12: 37
          Quote: just explo
          preserving the territorial integrity of Syria as a secular state

          This will be a natural consequence of the destruction of terrorists (IS, Nusra and other ash-shams and al-Islam) and the expulsion of the "coalition" invaders (Turks + Saud) from the territory of Syria.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +1
        19 February 2016 13: 21
        yes they went to ... (rhyme is not written.)
    2. +12
      19 February 2016 12: 00
      Russia did not go to Syria to charm them. So their disappointments are their own problems. smile
    3. +12
      19 February 2016 12: 08
      This mattress ram is disappointed that we are not bombing hospital excavators and camel drivers? We work, and this coalition works only with language.
      1. +1
        19 February 2016 12: 22
        “We are disappointed with the military actions (of Russia), which are not coordinated with the international coalition, as well as the fact that Russia's military actions are not focused on IS, but on supporting the Assad regime. The result is more bloodshed and suffering, which undermines the stated political goals of the Russian government. "

        Six months the same whining. It's time to add some variety and change the record. I am amazed at the courage of our diplomatic department to culturally react to this.

        “We have already said that the Russians have the opportunity, if they are willing to subscribe to the goals of the international anti-ISIS coalition, which includes 65 or 66 members, to contribute to these efforts, and we will welcome this.”

        Well, yes, the Russians had to sign up as 67 members and, as usual, do all the dirty work for them.
        1. PKK
          +1
          19 February 2016 12: 36
          Disappointed in a felt boot or in an empty sack .. The United States scored sixes of all stripes in the coalition and now their fingers are bent in front of them.
    4. 0
      19 February 2016 15: 18
      I hope this is not their last disappointment.
  2. 0
    19 February 2016 11: 57
    which includes 65 or 66 members

    They don’t remember how much members of scored. And what can we say about the effectiveness of this very coalition, but they seek to teach Russia by inertia.
    1. +3
      19 February 2016 12: 00
      And we are not in a coalition. tongue And who in this case should crawl and negotiate? Really great? tongue laughing
      1. +2
        19 February 2016 12: 20
        It reminds me of a situation when a crowd gathered in the courtyard to beat a local bully terrorizing the entire area, while everyone was going by a man walked by and publicly slapped this bully on the neck, after which everyone felt sorry for him (the bully) and everyone was offered to discuss the situation ... you can think of the situation!
    2. +3
      19 February 2016 12: 01
      ..... Themselves do not remember how many members they recruited. ....


      .... Members are just some kind of microscopic ..... There are 65 or 66 belay , but they are not visible ... laughing
      1. 0
        19 February 2016 13: 30
        Quote: aleks 62 next
        They themselves do not remember how many members they recruited

        Mustache is correct. Mathematics 66-65 = one term. The others in turn ... raise their hands for.
    3. +1
      19 February 2016 12: 27
      Just two of them have been received. So they get confused.
    4. 0
      19 February 2016 13: 16
      But because one of these members is the United States itself. When necessary, they will change sides, which has always been.
  3. +1
    19 February 2016 11: 57
    The result is more bloodshed and suffering.
    Well, what are we going to do with excavators now, like the entire progressive coalition?
    1. +1
      19 February 2016 12: 11
      Quote: Nord2015
      The result is more bloodshed and suffering.
      Well, what are we going to do with excavators now, like the entire progressive coalition?

      and a representative of the opposition will come to Munich with a bucket from an excavator, like the PRSh with a piece of iron in the UN.
      "I, a hereditary Syrian, the daughter of an excavator ..."
  4. +3
    19 February 2016 11: 58
    Boring ... He thought we wake them up, and they crush us.
  5. Dam
    +3
    19 February 2016 11: 59
    So we will disappoint you more than once citizens of p-sy
  6. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 00
    I wonder if the members know that they are in a coalition?
  7. 0
    19 February 2016 12: 01
    They behave like a whiny girl who cannot be disappointed, frightened, alarmed, strained and much more. They just hang out under their feet and are tired of everyone!
  8. +3
    19 February 2016 12: 01
    SPED, pay attention to the suffering in Libya and not in Syria, and finally shut up! pancake overpowered the same parrots! am
  9. +3
    19 February 2016 12: 02
    This is definitely a spring exacerbation, or rather year-round, something like that.
  10. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 03
    The White House (a psychiatric hospital from high-ranking Yankees) has obviously beguiled the coast, forgetting about the legitimacy of this or that coalition
  11. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 03
    And what, before they were divided? Or did they hint at agreement? It's time to get used to it, citizens are "partners". The bear's fangs and claws were in order, and he also did not lose his sense of smell.
  12. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 04
    Quote: rotmistr60
    which includes 65 or 66 members

    They don’t remember how much members of scored. And what can we say about the effectiveness of this very coalition, but they seek to teach Russia by inertia.

    They just do not know whether to count Canada or not, which has fallen.)))
  13. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 05
    The White House sleeps
    Only ISIS is awake ...
    laughing
  14. +3
    19 February 2016 12: 05
    To share the views of the West on the situation in Syria? They have not yet taken off their rose-colored glasses there, thinking that Russia, under pressure from the West, will dance to the tune wherever the question of survival in the future is possible ...
  15. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 08
    But Russia offered to join everyone ... And coordination would be common goals, but ... someone decided to be smarter. What to regret now? That the whole thing ends without you and much faster?
  16. +7
    19 February 2016 12: 10
    We are disappointed with the military actions (of Russia), which are not coordinated with the international coalition, as well as the fact that Russia's military actions are not focused on IS, but on supporting the Assad regime
    We know the reason for your disappointments
  17. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 14
    Quote: AlexTires
    To share the views of the West on the situation in Syria? They have not yet taken off their rose-colored glasses there, thinking that Russia, under pressure from the West, will dance to the tune wherever the question of survival in the future is possible ...

    Yes, they understand everything. But they are trying hard to put on rose-colored glasses for their readership, this is a statement for internal use.
  18. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 17
    65 or 66 coalition members - so what?
    A.V. Suvorov taught to fight not by numbers, but by skill!
  19. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 19
    That would take these ghouls-talkers from the State Department and so on, send incognito to live somewhere in Raqqa or some other Igilov’s nest, then see how their views on life change, and how they sing then!
  20. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 21
    They are not “disappointed” by our actions, but rather frightened and discouraged. Bloodshed, you say? And what to do with those who came to a foreign land to kill and plunder? And anyway, Washington would sit at home with its puppets!
    1. +2
      19 February 2016 12: 27
      But what about the democracy that needs to be promoted?
      hi
      And Russia bothers them, Oh, how it bothers them, so they are disappointed.
      1. PKK
        +1
        19 February 2016 12: 39
        Well, not quite, in Syria, the "Democratic Army of Syria" defeated ISIS. But the United States cannot hear joy from such a democracy.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  21. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 23
    Oh, what an embarrassment came out, the Russians refused to dig a hole for themselves, but Europe and the striped ones for themselves stubbornly continue to do it_Amen. wassat
  22. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 24
    I am ready to give a standing ovation to such statements of the White House! the more there are, the better, it means we are moving correctly!
  23. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 25
    Continue to be disappointed, and as in the fable: but Vaska listens, but eats.
  24. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 27
    “Russia is asking us for many things. Not on specific issues, flights or bombings. But they really want information in order to better understand our operations, ”the general said.

    "But I am not ready to share this information," he added.


    You will decide. With goals ...
  25. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 30
    They lie, dirty, shit on every corner and you see disappointed in their misunderstanding! Our famous humorist said correctly: "... well, stupid"! And I would add - arrogant!
  26. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 32
    Actually, the White House is not a decree for us in the Syrian issue. Let him point out to his satellites
    such as the Turks, Balts, Poles and other gayropeans. We will not share your views on
    the situation in Syria. Just as the United States does not share our views on the situation, for example, in Ukraine.
  27. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 34
    Why should we share their view of Syria? Are you used to the fact that everyone agrees with them? Well Duc get it. Live now in disappointment and sadness!
  28. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 39
    I just want to tell them: but you wouldn’t have gone out!
  29. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 40
    It is not clear why the geeks are disappointed when they do not disclose their goals in Syria at all.
    http://topwar.ru/91163-amerikanskiy-general-rf-zaprashivaet-u-nas-informaciyu-ch
    toby-ponyat-sut-nashih-operaciy-v-sirii-no-my-ne-gotovy-eyu-delitsya.html
    “Russia is asking us for many things. Not on specific issues, flights or bombings. But they really want information in order to better understand our operations, ”the general said.
    And how to enter into a coalition with these scoundrels, if they do not say what they want at all, except "Assad must leave."
    There are no more decent words for these mattress animals.
  30. Pig
    +1
    19 February 2016 12: 41
    "" which has 65 or 66 members ""
    that is, he does not know exactly how many members the US-led "coalition" has?
    enchanting ...
  31. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 46
    D.B. (c)
    --------------------------------------
  32. +2
    19 February 2016 12: 46
    which includes 65 or 66 members

    The members must be counted first. This is the first thing. And the second thing. For some reason, we don’t want to be another member. And then. The number of members of the brain does not add.
  33. +1
    19 February 2016 12: 48
    Of course disappointed. They dreamed that Moscow would become like the EU and would silently and meekly follow instructions from Washington, faithfully looking in the eyes and wagging its tail. That we will leave the legally elected Assad and will try to transfer power by force to people who represent no one and represent nothing from themselves. The only chance these people have to get into power, only on Western bayonets, there are no other options. And all this is solely for the triumph of democracy in the American sense. Why do we need this?
  34. 0
    19 February 2016 12: 59
    Washington is disappointed that Russia does not dance and will not dance to their tune! And p. To break, do not roll bags.
  35. +1
    19 February 2016 13: 19
    such an impression that they were grown in an incubator - sometimes such stupidity does not last a day, that it is not in a fairy tale to say, not to describe with a pen ...
  36. +1
    19 February 2016 13: 44
    A madhouse at the level of a fragment from a play about Aesop, it seems, "The Fox and the Grapes". There, the owner of Aesop, in drunken boast, promised to drink the sea, and if he cannot, then he loses his entire fortune. He sobered up and until then could not find a place for himself, until Aesop advised him to declare that the promise would be fulfilled if the sea water was separated from the river water in the sea. And then, they say, everything will be all right, and he will drink the sea. So it is here, with America. Let's propose to them to separate the “moderate” oppositionists from the “wrong” ones, to disarm and place the “moderates” on some reservation, and transfer the coordinates of the “wrong” ones to Russia. Then it will be possible to consider the option of joining the coalition to Russia. That's right, and not vice versa. We are doing pretty well without their coalition.
  37. 0
    19 February 2016 14: 53
    The royal ambitions of the United States have already gotten everyone. Why should we suddenly share views with someone? We have our own worldview and our own tactics (the United States has not yet been understood, if they shout like that to the whole world about the Russian threat). For three years of fighting with zero score - is this their position in the fight against terrorists? am
  38. 0
    19 February 2016 15: 00
    Russia really does not share the views of same-sex people. Homosexuals - only in the face! It was here that ours diverged from their views. Further only more. If you are disappointed, then let the gay pride parade, copulate and self-satisfaction!
  39. 0
    19 February 2016 15: 01
    (does not share the goals of the coalition). In the coalition, all your American sixes are bribed by the dollar. And what are the goals if no one specifically talks about them, they are camouflaged with exclamations and conversations about the need to fight international terrorism, for democracy.
    (The result of this is more bloodshed and suffering) Remove your mercenaries from the criminal element collected from all over the world and paid with petrodollar again and there will be peace and quiet in Syria.
  40. vmo
    0
    19 February 2016 15: 19
    Washington is disappointed by the actions of Moscow, which does not share the goals of the coalition

    The Americans are again trying to confuse everyone, just as the die-hard cannot understand that the only goal is to destroy what they have created,this is isis !!!
  41. 0
    19 February 2016 17: 52
    we have different goals with them, some do things, others blather sitting in a chair
  42. 0
    19 February 2016 18: 04
    The goal of the coalition is not at all the elimination of terrorists from IS, but the overthrow of Assad.
  43. 0
    19 February 2016 20: 21
    The United States is an enemy of Russia, so Russia cannot share the views of the United States.
  44. 0
    19 February 2016 21: 28
    What a .... th coalition! Who, besides Russia, has the right to conduct military operations in Syria? Russia offered to enter into a coalition with it, who from the sunken West at least considered this proposal? And, in the end, who from this West paid attention to the suffering, once quite happy, people in North Africa and not only ?! K..ly! Crap!