Military Review

The White House is disappointed: Moscow does not want to share the views of the West on the situation in Syria

64
Washington is disappointed with the actions of Moscow, which does not share the goals of the coalition in the antiterrorist operation in Syria, reports RIA News statement by White House spokesman Josh Ernest.


The White House is disappointed: Moscow does not want to share the views of the West on the situation in Syria


“We have already said that Russians have the opportunity, if they are ready to subscribe to the goals of the international anti-Igil coalition, which includes 65 or 66 members, to contribute to these efforts, and we will welcome this. The Russians opposed this. Because of this resistance, they decided to take a series of unilateral steps, ”said a spokesman for the administration.

“We are disappointed with the military actions (of Russia), which are not coordinated with the international coalition, and also because the military actions of Russia are focused not on the IS, but on supporting the Assad regime. The result is more bloodshed and suffering, which undermines the stated political goals of the Russian government ",
he noted.
Photos used:
AFP 2016 / Brendan Smialowski
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pereira
    Pereira 19 February 2016 11: 56
    44
    Is the White House Disappointed?
    Did they really hope for something?
    Did they expect something else? Weird people.
    After half a year, Chingachguk noticed that the barn does not have one wall (tse).

    I hope this is not their last disappointment.
    1. Pravdarm
      Pravdarm 19 February 2016 12: 00
      17
      Washington disappointed by Moscow’s actions that do not share coalition goals
      What are the goals ?! We have one goal - the IG and others like them! And you?
      Zadolbali these tricks.
      Again disappointed, worried, offended ... as usual!
      They say to the offended, they carry water, and they are engaged in abuse of the offended!
      So we put on your fears and disappointments!
      1. just exp
        just exp 19 February 2016 12: 06
        16
        our goal is not ISIS, our goal is to preserve the territorial integrity of Syria in the form secular state.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 19 February 2016 12: 12
          +8
          Let the United States look at its “face” of double standards in a political mirror and answer its own question! Is such a deceitful old "ro.ozh.e" someone in their right mind and memory will trust them? !!
          1. cniza
            cniza 19 February 2016 12: 36
            +6
            If they were walking in the forest, late, we would come and do what we promised.
            1. comprochikos
              comprochikos 19 February 2016 13: 32
              0
              It would be possible to share any goals, if you know which ones. And you don’t understand them. They think one thing, they say another (and everything is different), but they do the third. Would have decided already. But Russia has one goal - to destroy terrorism and preserve the state of Syria.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. Oldwiser
          Oldwiser 19 February 2016 12: 37
          +1
          Quote: just explo
          preservation of the territorial integrity of Syria in the form of a secular state

          This will be a natural consequence of the destruction of terrorists (IS, Nusra and other ash-shams and al-Islam) and the expulsion of the "coalition" invaders (Turks + Saud) from Syria.
        3. Oldwiser
          Oldwiser 19 February 2016 12: 37
          +1
          Quote: just explo
          preservation of the territorial integrity of Syria in the form of a secular state

          This will be a natural consequence of the destruction of terrorists (IS, Nusra and other ash-shams and al-Islam) and the expulsion of the "coalition" invaders (Turks + Saud) from Syria.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Air Force Colonel
        Air Force Colonel 19 February 2016 13: 21
        +1
        yes they went to ... (rhyme is not written.)
    2. The black
      The black 19 February 2016 12: 00
      12
      Russia did not go to Syria to captivate them. So their charm is their personal problem. smile
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 19 February 2016 12: 08
      12
      Is this mattress ram disappointed that we won’t bomb the hospital’s excavators and camel drivers? We work, and this coalition works only in language.
      1. marna
        marna 19 February 2016 12: 22
        +1
        “We are disappointed with the hostilities of (Russia), which are not coordinated with the international coalition, and the fact that the hostilities of Russia are not focused on the Islamic State, but on supporting the Assad regime. The result is more bloodshed and suffering, which undermines the stated political goals of the Russian government. ”

        Six months the same nagging. It's time to add variety and change the record. I am amazed at the endurance of our diplomatic department to respond culturally to this.

        “We have already said that the Russians have the opportunity, if they are willing to subscribe to the goals of the international anti-ISIS coalition, which includes 65 or 66 members, to contribute to these efforts, and we will welcome this.”

        Well, yes, the Russians had to sign up for 67 members and, as usual, do all the dirty work for them.
        1. PKK
          PKK 19 February 2016 12: 36
          +1
          Disappointed in felt boots or in an empty bag .. THE UNIT scored sixes of all stripes in the coalition and now fingers bend in front of them.
    4. Tra-ta-ta
      Tra-ta-ta 19 February 2016 15: 18
      0
      I hope this is not their last disappointment.
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 February 2016 11: 57
    0
    which includes 65 or 66 members

    They don’t remember how much members of scored. And what can we say about the effectiveness of this very coalition, but they seek to teach Russia by inertia.
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 19 February 2016 12: 00
      +3
      And we are not in a coalition. tongue And who in this case should crawl and negotiate? Really great? tongue laughing
      1. 73bor
        73bor 19 February 2016 12: 20
        +2
        It reminds me of a situation when a crowd gathered in the courtyard to beat a local bully terrorizing the whole area, while a man walked by and a public bully pushed his neck, after which everyone (his bully) felt sorry for him and all offered to discuss ... the situation can be thought out!
    2. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 19 February 2016 12: 01
      +3
      ..... They don’t remember how many members they got. ....


      .... Members are just some kind of microscopic ..... There are 65 or 66 belay , but they are not visible ... laughing
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 19 February 2016 13: 30
        0
        Quote: aleks 62 next
        They themselves do not remember how many members scored

        The mustache is correct. Mathematics 66-65 = member one. The others take turns ... raise their hands behind.
    3. Pereira
      Pereira 19 February 2016 12: 27
      +1
      Just two of them received. That's confused.
    4. armata37
      armata37 19 February 2016 13: 16
      0
      But because one of these members is the United States. When necessary, they will change sides, which has always been.
  3. Nord2015
    Nord2015 19 February 2016 11: 57
    +1
    The result is more bloodshed and misery.
    Well, what do we now have to fight with excavators like the whole progressive coalition?
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 19 February 2016 12: 11
      +1
      Quote: Nord2015
      The result is more bloodshed and misery.
      Well, what do we now have to fight with excavators like the whole progressive coalition?

      and an opposition representative will come to Munich with a bucket from an excavator, like a PRS with a piece of iron at the UN.
      "I, a hereditary Syrian, the daughter of an excavator ..."
  4. DIMA45R
    DIMA45R 19 February 2016 11: 58
    +3
    Boredom ... He thought we would wake them up, and they would crush us.
  5. Dam
    Dam 19 February 2016 11: 59
    +3
    So we will disappoint you more than once citizens
  6. Berber
    Berber 19 February 2016 12: 00
    +2
    Interestingly, do members know that they are in a coalition?
  7. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 19 February 2016 12: 01
    0
    They behave like a crying girl who can’t be disappointed, frightened, alarmed, strained, and much more. They just hang out under their feet and are tired of everything!
  8. salad
    salad 19 February 2016 12: 01
    +3
    GosPED, pay attention to the suffering in Libya and not in Syria, and shut up finally! defeated the pancake the same parrots! am
  9. GSVG 86-88
    GSVG 86-88 19 February 2016 12: 02
    +3
    This is exactly a spring exacerbation, or rather year-round, something like that.
  10. Wolka
    Wolka 19 February 2016 12: 03
    +2
    The White House (a psychiatric hospital from high-ranking Yankees) obviously got tangled up forgetting about the legitimacy of a coalition
  11. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 19 February 2016 12: 03
    +2
    And what, before they were divided? Or did they hint at agreement? It's time to get used to it, citizens are "partners". The bear's fangs and claws were in order, and he also did not lose his sense of smell.
  12. Bacha
    Bacha 19 February 2016 12: 04
    +1
    Quote: rotmistr60
    which includes 65 or 66 members

    They don’t remember how much members of scored. And what can we say about the effectiveness of this very coalition, but they seek to teach Russia by inertia.

    They just do not know whether to count Canada or not, which has fallen.)))
  13. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 19 February 2016 12: 05
    +2
    The White House is sleeping
    Only ISIS does not sleep ...
    laughing
  14. AlexTires
    AlexTires 19 February 2016 12: 05
    +3
    To share Western views on the situation in Syria? Until then, they did not take off their pink glasses, thinking that Russia, being under pressure from the West, would dance to the tune, where perhaps the question of survival in the future stands ...
  15. russmensch
    russmensch 19 February 2016 12: 08
    +1
    But Russia offered to join everyone ... And coordination would be joint goals, but ... someone decided to be more intelligent. What now to regret? That the whole thing ends without you and much faster?
  16. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 19 February 2016 12: 10
    +7
    We are disappointed with the military operations (of Russia), which are not coordinated with the international coalition, and the fact that the military operations of Russia are focused not on the Islamic State, but on the support of the Assad regime
    We know the reason for your disappointments
  17. Yugan Oleg
    Yugan Oleg 19 February 2016 12: 14
    +1
    Quote: AlexTires
    To share Western views on the situation in Syria? Until then, they did not take off their pink glasses, thinking that Russia, being under pressure from the West, would dance to the tune, where perhaps the question of survival in the future stands ...

    Yes, they understand everything. But they are trying hard to put pink glasses on to their readership, this is a statement for internal use.
  18. Balagan
    Balagan 19 February 2016 12: 17
    +1
    65 or 66 coalition members - so what?
    More A.V. Suvorov taught to fight not by numbers, but by skill!
  19. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 19 February 2016 12: 19
    +2
    That would take these ghouls-talkers from the State Department and so on, send incognito to live somewhere in Raqqa or some other Igilov’s nest, then see how their views on life change, and how they sing then!
  20. Alfizik
    Alfizik 19 February 2016 12: 21
    +1
    They are not “disappointed” by our actions, but rather frightened and discouraged. Bloodshed, you say? And what to do with those who came to a foreign land to kill and plunder? And anyway, Washington would sit at home with its puppets!
    1. Delink
      Delink 19 February 2016 12: 27
      +2
      But what about democracy that needs to be promoted?
      hi
      But Russia interferes with them, Oh, how it interferes, so they are disappointed.
      1. PKK
        PKK 19 February 2016 12: 39
        +1
        Well, not really, in Syria, the "Democratic Army of Syria" defeated ISIS. But the United States cannot hear joy from such a democracy.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  21. vell.65
    vell.65 19 February 2016 12: 23
    +1
    Oh, what embarrassment came out, the Russians refused to dig a hole for themselves, but Europe and the striped ones for themselves_Amen persistently did it. wassat
  22. niki233
    niki233 19 February 2016 12: 24
    +1
    I am ready to applaud such statements of the White House while standing! the more they will be the better, then we are moving correctly!
  23. Grigorievich
    Grigorievich 19 February 2016 12: 25
    +2
    Continue to be disappointed further, and as in a fable: and Vaska listens, but eats.
  24. Wedmak
    Wedmak 19 February 2016 12: 27
    +1
    “Russia is asking us for many things. Not on specific issues, flights or bombings. But they really want information in order to better understand our operations, ”the general said.

    "But I am not ready to share this information," he added.


    You already decide. For purposes ...
  25. Fonmeg
    Fonmeg 19 February 2016 12: 30
    +1
    They lie, dirty, shit on every corner and you see disappointed in their misunderstanding! Our famous comedian said correctly: "... well, stupid"! And I would add - arrogant!
  26. valent45
    valent45 19 February 2016 12: 32
    +1
    Actually, the White House is not a decree for us on the Syrian issue. Let points to its satellites
    such as Turks, Balts, Poles, and other gay people. We will not share your views on
    the situation in Syria. Just as the United States does not share our views on the situation, for example, in Ukraine.
  27. sledge
    sledge 19 February 2016 12: 34
    +1
    And why should we share their view of Syria? Are you used to everyone agreeing with them? Well so get. Live now in frustration and sadness!
  28. triglav
    triglav 19 February 2016 12: 39
    +1
    So I want to tell them: if you would not have gone!
  29. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 19 February 2016 12: 40
    +1
    It is not clear what the geeks are disappointed when they do not report their goals in Syria at all.
    http://topwar.ru/91163-amerikanskiy-general-rf-zaprashivaet-u-nas-informaciyu-ch
    toby-ponyat-sut-nashih-operaciy-v-sirii-no-my-ne-gotovy-eyu-delitsya.html
    “Russia is asking us for many things. Not on specific issues, flights or bombings. But they really want information in order to better understand our operations, ”the general said.
    And how to enter into a coalition with these scoundrels, if they do not say what they want at all, except "Assad must leave."
    There are no decent words for these mattress animals.
  30. Pig
    Pig 19 February 2016 12: 41
    +1
    "" which has 65 or 66 members ""
    that is, he does not know exactly how many members the US-led "coalition" has?
    enchanting ...
  31. izya top
    izya top 19 February 2016 12: 46
    +2
    D.B. (c)
    --------------------------------------
  32. Stinger
    Stinger 19 February 2016 12: 46
    +2
    which includes 65 or 66 members

    First you need to count the members. This is the first. And the second one. For some reason we do not want to be another member. And than. The number of brain members does not add.
  33. X Y Z
    X Y Z 19 February 2016 12: 48
    +1
    Well, of course, disappointed. They dreamed that Moscow would become like the EU and would silently and meekly follow instructions from Washington, faithfully looking into the eyes and waving its tail. What we will leave, legally elected Assad, and we will try by force to transfer power to people who are not representing anyone and are not representing anything. The only chance these people get in power is only on Western bayonets, there are no other options. And all this solely for the triumph of democracy in the American sense of it. Why do we need this?
  34. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 19 February 2016 12: 59
    0
    Washington is disappointed that Russia does not dance and will not dance to their tune! And p.zdet, not tossing bags.
  35. Conscience
    Conscience 19 February 2016 13: 19
    +1
    it seems that they were grown in an incubator - sometimes such stupidity is not a day that it’s not a fairy tale to say, not a pen to describe ...
  36. netvrz
    netvrz 19 February 2016 13: 44
    +1
    A madhouse at the level of a fragment from a play about Aesop, it seems, "The Fox and the Grapes". There, the owner of Aesop, in drunken boast, promised to drink the sea, and if he cannot, then he loses his entire fortune. Sobered up and until then could not find a place for himself, until Aesop advised him to declare that the promise would be fulfilled if the sea was separated from the river water. And then, they say, everything will be all right, and he will drink the sea. So it is here, with America. Let's propose to them to separate the "moderate" oppositionists from the "wrong" ones, to disarm and place the "moderates" on some reservation, and hand over the coordinates of the "wrong" ones to Russia. Then it will be possible to consider the option of joining the coalition to Russia. That's right, and not vice versa. We are doing pretty well without their coalition.
  37. afrikanez
    afrikanez 19 February 2016 14: 53
    0
    The royal ambitions of the United States, already got everyone. Why should we share our views with someone? We have our own worldview and our own tactics (we still do not understand the United States, if they are so screaming at the whole world about the Russian threat). For three years of struggle with a zero result - is this their position in the fight against terrorists? am
  38. chelovektapok
    chelovektapok 19 February 2016 15: 00
    0
    Russia really does not share the views of fellow believers. Homosexual- only in the face! It was here that ours diverged with their views. Further only more. If you are disappointed, then let the geyparad lead, copulate and self-satisfied!
  39. renics
    renics 19 February 2016 15: 01
    0
    (does not share the goals of the coalition). In the coalition, all your American sixes are bribed by the dollar. And what kind of goals, if nobody specifically talks about them, they are camouflaged by exclamations and talk about the need to fight international terrorism, for democracy.
    (The result of this is more bloodshed and misery) Remove your mercenaries from the criminal element collected from around the world and paid again by the petrodollar and there will be peace and quiet in Syria.
  40. vmo
    vmo 19 February 2016 15: 19
    0
    Washington disappointed by Moscow’s actions that do not share coalition goals

    The Americans are again trying to confuse everyone, as the die-hard can not understand that the goal alone is to destroy what they created,this is igil !!!
  41. mr.grin19z
    mr.grin19z 19 February 2016 17: 52
    0
    we have different goals; some do things, others blather sitting in a chair
  42. jaroff
    jaroff 19 February 2016 18: 04
    0
    The purpose of the coalition is not to destroy terrorists from the Islamic State at all, but to overthrow Assad.
  43. cergey51046
    cergey51046 19 February 2016 20: 21
    0
    The USA is an enemy of Russia, therefore Russia cannot share the views of the USA.
  44. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad 19 February 2016 21: 28
    0
    What a .... coalition! Who, besides Russia, has the right to conduct military operations in Syria? Russia was invited to join the coalition with her, who from the descending west at least considered this proposal? And, in the end, who from this west drew attention to the suffering, once quite happy, of people in northern Africa and not only ?! K..ly! Pancake!