Military Review

In Russia, tested a new parachute system for dumping combat vehicles

30
Tekhnodinamika holding (part of Rostec corporation) conducted successful test discharges of BMD with a new parachute-assault system "Bakhcha-U-PDS", reports press office corporations.


In Russia, tested a new parachute system for dumping combat vehicles


“The discharges of assault vehicles with the new Bakhcha-U-PDS parachute system were successful. The discharges were carried out within the framework of the stage of finalization of joint state tests at the V.P. Chkalov. A total of 11 BMD discharges took place in November and one armored personnel carrier dropping from the parachute systems of the holding, ”the report says.

“The state joint tests of Bakhchi-U-PDS will last until the end of December 2016, but the discharge program as part of the BMD at the final stage has already been completed, and according to its results, we can say that our equipment worked without failures, proving its reliability and high efficiency , - quotes the press service of the head of "Technodynamics" Maxim Kuzyuk. - In addition, three more of the five discharges in the composition of armored vehicles (BTR) must pass. We expect to start serial deliveries of "Bakhchi-U-PDS" already in 2017 year ".

The parachute system is intended for delivery to the land of combat vehicles with a crew, and according to its characteristics has no foreign analogues.

“Bakhcha-U-PDS” consists of suspended, amortization, and also parachute systems. The parachute system was developed by the Parachute Research Institute (part of Technodinamics) and includes 11 main parachute blocks with an area of ​​350 square. m each. An innovative solution when creating a landing facility is the developed principle of “forced supercharging”, which is guaranteed to reduce overloads to acceptable values ​​when landing, ”the release says.
Photos used:
http://rostec.ru/
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. andre
    andre 18 February 2016 13: 03
    13
    Well, I like our developers, with their names for systems and weapons, such a BAHCHA UPS from the sky am
    1. cap
      cap 18 February 2016 13: 18
      +7
      KatyushaKatyusha
      Quote: andre
      Well, I like our developers, with their names for systems and weapons, such a BAHCHA UPS from the sky am


      Melons, poplars, carnations, white swans have no military pathos, which cannot be said about "partners". But our armored train ... then you know. But the bitch .... ki, our songs are forgotten. About Katyusha, for example.
    2. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 18 February 2016 13: 44
      +1
      Quote: andre
      Well, I like our developers with their names of systems and weapons, such a BAGCHA UPS from the sky

      We always had good names, but something has changed in the reports.
      In total, since November 11 BMD dumps and one armored personnel carrier dump with holding parachute landing systems have taken place
      - I did not understand the last 4 words. That is, what is PDS - I know and understand. And what is the holding's PDS?

      I apologize for turning off my brains so frankly, but for more than twenty Soviet calendars in the army, I have not met the expression "PDS holding" ... request

      Is it called that now? Vasily Filippich would pull out his beloved "Parabellum" ....
      1. yegor_k
        yegor_k 18 February 2016 13: 47
        +3
        Written by the same PDS developed by the holding "Technodinamika" ... reduced as follows.
        1. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 18 February 2016 15: 40
          +3
          Quote: yegor_k
          Written by the same PDS developed by the holding "Technodinamika" ... reduced as follows.

          Really, getting old ... request

          It seemed to me that this is a new term - "PDS holding". laughing
          hold 1. to keep. 2. hold, hold. 3. support, restrain.
          I thought it was not just PDS, but some kind of new system. He taught English at a time when in our country not only the Tekhnodinamika holding, but even cooperatives, except for rural consumer cooperation, there were no ... And democrats, too ... There was a country and there were Airborne Forces. Without any holdings ...

          Thanks to God, the Airborne Forces survived in all these reforms. This means that the country will not go anywhere.
          1. Throw
            Throw 18 February 2016 20: 05
            0
            Zoldat: "PDS holding" is the "golden parachutes" of its top managers laughing
    3. Pajamas
      Pajamas 18 February 2016 17: 57
      0
      In the USSR and Russia Reliable parachute systems, here is another backfill on the reserve, two were able to make a landing, which was not very soft but without serious injuries.


      During the exercises of the Airborne Forces in the Pskov region at an altitude of 400 m above the ground, two paratroopers collided, but they managed to successfully land on one reserve parachute. This was reported by TASS with reference to the Ministry of Defense of Russia.

      “The incident occurred immediately after the regular opening of the main parachutes, the domes of which, due to the resulting interference, either went out or opened, rapidly increasing the speed of descent and the approach of paratroopers to the ground. Thanks to courageous and competent actions to help each other in the air, contract soldiers who found themselves in a difficult, life-threatening situation managed to overcome it successfully, ”the Ministry of Defense said. According to the report, the paratroopers escaped with only abrasions and scratches.

      It is reported that for skillful actions the paratroopers were rewarded with medals “Army General V.F. Margelov. " The soldiers were awarded medals by the deputy commander of the Airborne Forces for Airborne Training Vladimir Kochetkov.
  2. avvg
    avvg 18 February 2016 13: 03
    +5
    In the Arctic, they are very useful.
    1. Primus pilus
      Primus pilus 18 February 2016 13: 05
      +4
      In this matter, we are still ahead of everyone.
  3. Giant thought
    Giant thought 18 February 2016 13: 06
    +1
    The good news is that more and more advanced equipment comes to our troops, because there is no limit to perfection. We hope that such dynamics of arms supplies will continue for many years.
    1. midivan
      midivan 18 February 2016 18: 38
      +3
      Quote: Giant thought
      The good news is that more and more advanced equipment comes to our troops, because there is no limit to perfection. We hope that such dynamics of arms supplies will continue for many years.

      not only equipment! Near Pskov, two paratroopers escaped by landing on one parachute
      Today at 17: 16, views: 4546

      Two paratroopers participating in the training landing in the Pskov region managed to land on one parachute after their main parachutes did not open.

      Despite the different speed of fall, they managed to get closer to each other and open one for two emergency parachute 400 meters from the ground. This saved their life: the paratroopers escaped with abrasions.

      For well-coordinated and courageous actions, the Ministry of Defense awarded the paratroopers with medals “Army General V.F. Margelov,” the press service of the department said.


      Source: TASS Organizations: Army http://www.mk.ru/politics/2016/02/18/pod-pskovom-dva-desantnika-spaslis-prizemli
      vshis-na-odnom-parashyute.html
      It used to be in the movies before, but if it’s true, then you can only guess about the professionalism of our Airborne soldier
  4. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 18 February 2016 13: 07
    0
    With such systems, Russia will become even more afraid, enemies will think that we will fall upon their unfortunate heads from the ceiling!
  5. tol100v
    tol100v 18 February 2016 13: 07
    +1
    So the replacement of GPS-600 came. Have a good trip with good reliability!
  6. triglav
    triglav 18 February 2016 13: 08
    +1
    Wow! They won’t follow us.
  7. Lanista
    Lanista 18 February 2016 13: 12
    +2
    It is interesting that only we and the French are able to parachute equipment in a parachute manner. Moreover, the French are NOT ABLE to drop BM with the crew inside, but we can.

    When ours tested the operation of these systems in real conditions, volunteers were used. One of the volunteers was the son of V. Margelov, by the way. The system worked perfectly.
    Having learned about these tests, the French decided to repeat them on their technique. According to the French tradition, there were no volunteers in the army, and they recruited them in prisons, promising an amnesty. The French did not grow together - none of the BM crew survived.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 18 February 2016 13: 18
      +1
      Quote: Lanista
      none of the BM crew survived.

      Well then amnestied?
      1. Lanista
        Lanista 18 February 2016 13: 22
        +1
        Well then amnestied?

        Posthumously...
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 18 February 2016 13: 25
          +1
          Quote: Lanista
          Posthumously...

          So not fooled.
          1. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 18 February 2016 15: 45
            +3
            Quote: Lanista
            Well then amnestied?

            Posthumously...

            Quote: Vladimirets
            Quote: Lanista
            Posthumously...

            So not fooled.
            So that's what democracy is - said: "It will be bad" and did not deceive. Well, then they put a dead poultice ....
    2. gjv
      gjv 18 February 2016 14: 29
      +4
      Quote: Lanista
      parachute technique

    3. Professor
      Professor 18 February 2016 14: 58
      -1
      Quote: Lanista
      It is interesting that only we and the French are able to parachute equipment in a parachute manner. Moreover, the French are NOT ABLE to drop BM with the crew inside, but we can.

      Tell why or guess yourself? I hint, when was the last time the USSR / Russia carried out military landing (parachuting)? Maybe in Afghanistan, Chechnya, Georgia, Syria? No?
      Do the bourgeois know when? Israel in the Sinai in 1956, the United States in Panama in 1989, France in Mali in 2013. Special Forces do not take into account.
  8. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 18 February 2016 13: 13
    0
    Interestingly, the USA still has the M551 Sheridan in service, or did their landing without fire support remain?
  9. 31rus
    31rus 18 February 2016 13: 18
    +1
    Dear, well, one of the reasons is whether the Airborne Forces, in the form that exists now, are not just needed, but necessary, especially now
    1. andr1966a
      andr1966a 18 February 2016 13: 32
      +2
      Quote: 31rus
      Dear, well, one of the reasons is whether the Airborne Forces, in the form that exists now, are not just needed, but necessary, especially now

      Low bow to BATE MARGELOV
  10. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 18 February 2016 13: 24
    0
    With such a system, Assad’s army equipment can be dumped into the settled cities of Syria. ..
    1. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 18 February 2016 13: 49
      0
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      With such a system, Assad’s army equipment can be dumped into the settled cities of Syria. ..

      In no case! You don't know about the operation with the death of the "Black Hawk Down". After all, this was a real operation by American special forces in Somalia. All equipment will be destroyed from grenade launchers, and the paratroopers, without support, will not last long either. Assad's army advances very slowly, especially in cities. This operation is doomed to failure in advance.
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 18 February 2016 16: 09
        +2
        Quote: Алексей_К
        You don’t know operation with the death of the "Black Hawk Down". After all, it was a real operation of American commandos in Somalia. All equipment will be destroyed from grenade launchers, and paratroopers, without support, too, will not last long.

        Usually for America - "at some point something went wrong"

        Quote: Алексей_К
        and paratroopers, without support, too, will not last long

        The landing party does not set the goal of seizing and holding positions for a long time. The landing force captures and holds the bridgehead until the main forces arrive. In Somalia, it was not the capture and retention of positions, but a special operation. And the tactics should be different. And they flooded in columns, like on a training ground in Oklahoma ... Did you think they would be scared and everyone scattered? Or you can say to the baboons: "Wait, time-out, like in basketball. We will take out the crews now and will fight further ..."? I have read what is available on this topic. Most liked the movie R. Scott laughing There the operation is carried out most intelligently. But in fact - mediocre organization and planning, the absence of any interaction whatsoever, the perplexity and lack of professionalism of the performers.

        By virtue of my professional training, I can imagine how it would have been planned in the Soviet Union. I will not shout "Hurray!" and "We would have them ...", but all this could have been done quieter and more accurate ... They did it ...

        And here's what I would like to say -
        Our guys no longer perceived America as a superpower. So when they left Afghanistan, they went to Somalia and carefully prepared themselves for a long war ... They were amazed when they discovered how low the morale of American soldiers was. ... America has appropriated the titles of world leader and master of a new world order. After several blows, she forgot about these titles and got out of Somalia with shame and shame, dragging the bodies of her soldiers.
        He said, just in case, the one who knows what the sugar bone from America’s hands tastes like bin Laden .... Didn’t they feed him in Afghanistan?
    2. Bashibuzuk
      Bashibuzuk 18 February 2016 14: 00
      +1
      Not only that, the technology of the Assad army.
      So that we are not accused of all nonsense. we can help the IS by dumping, for example, militants in a location.
      You can not even bother with parachutes. Just dump, that's all.
  11. sodick
    sodick 18 February 2016 14: 43
    +1
    And was the son of the current commander in chief of the airborne forces the first to jump inside the equipment?
  12. Koshak
    Koshak 18 February 2016 17: 52
    0
    Margelov would be pleased soldier
  13. Lock
    Lock 23 February 2016 08: 04
    0
    For your information:
    - Bahcha-U - product code BMD-4M
    - PDS - parachute assault
    If together "Bakhcha-U-PDS" - the ROC code for the creation of BMD-4M landing equipment.
    The code of the airborne landing gear is PBS-950U (PBS - parachute strapdown tools, there are also platform ones, but not for BMD-4).
    Why Technodinamika, because the holding includes MKPK "Universal" - a developer of airborne vehicles.
    The French tried to create a parachute-jet system for landing equipment with a crew on board. Suicide prisoners were "selected" for testing, there was a refusal, no one survived, the experiments stopped ... At that time, the USSR was the only country that had the means to drop equipment with a crew inside, today such a country is Russia!