Egyptian President announced non-interference in the affairs of the Syrian Republic

59
Cairo will not interfere in the intra Syrian problems, respecting the will of the people of the republic, reports RIA News statement by the Egyptian President Abdel al-Sisi.



According to his owls, "non-interference in the affairs of other states out of respect for the will of the peoples inhabiting them is the principled position of the Egyptian government."

“Egypt’s position regarding Syria has not changed - it consists in non-interference in its affairs, respect for the will of its people, the fight against terrorism and the work of a political settlement of the crisis, while preserving the integrity of its territory”,
told al-Sisi to the editors of Kuwaiti media on Wednesday.

Discussing with the guests the events of 1991 g, when Egypt helped Kuwait to liberate its territory from Iraqi troops invading the camp, the president noted that now “hesitantly sends his troops to the Persian Gulf countries if they are subjected to any kind of attack or direct threat ".
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    18 February 2016 11: 39
    Our person!!! The Egyptians have no hands to go against Russia.
    1. +11
      18 February 2016 11: 41
      The words are not a boy but a husband, here is the wise decision of the Egyptian president.
      1. +5
        18 February 2016 11: 45
        He is a competent and balanced politician, and he wants to have normal relations with Russia.
        1. +1
          18 February 2016 11: 58
          Different leaders began to realize, looking at Erdogan, including that no US would help them, in which case ... even butting with Russia, your "exceptional" homosexuals from overseas are afraid !!!
          1. +1
            18 February 2016 13: 44
            It should be noted that in Egypt the situation is not simple.
            Egypt is the historical homeland of the Muslim Brotherhood, the first Islamic organization in the Arab world to be formed here in 1928.
            After the fall of the SOVIET regime of Mubarak in Egypt, radical Islam seriously entrenched in the Sinai, and the actions of the Islamists got out of control. Since November 2014, the Egyptian Islamic group Ansar Beit al-Mekdam (declared terrorist) has been considered in the ISIS hierarchy as the “Sinai province of the Islamic Caliphate” and represents a threat to the war in the region (Egypt, Israel, Jordan, SA, oil principalities of the Persian Gulf) . The Suez Canal, the gas pipeline, and the tourism business are at stake.
            The Egyptian Islamists are present in all the higher structures of the "Islamic International", occupy leading positions and are responsible for the technology, administration and finances of the Islamic State.
            In 2013, the military returned to power in Egypt with the help of Riyadh. Egypt has poor relations with Qatar and Turkey, which have supported and are supporting Islamists in Egypt. The Egyptian leadership is trying to restore the economy, consolidate power and overcome external isolation. There is progress, but the country is suffocating from overpopulation and must provide youth with work. And the activity of Islamists scares investors.
            In the Egyptian media, President Al-Sisi appears to be Nasser's spiritual heir. However, the ruling classes of Egyptian society, which formed under Sadat and Mubarak, under the "open door" policy, clearly do not accept violence (the construction of industrial Egypt on the Soviet model). Their interests are connected with obtaining bureaucratic and comprador rents, maintaining the course towards preserving the existing order. If such a position prevails, then the next Islamic revolution in Egypt may become a reality.
            This is the situation in Egypt.

            Based on the book
            ISIS. The ominous shadow of the Caliphate./ Comp. Andrey Kemal. - M .: Algorithm, 2015. - 224 sec. - (Military columnist)
        2. -3
          18 February 2016 12: 27
          It is very "wise" for both ours and yours. I wonder what you would say if these words were uttered by Putin? Egypt has a fire nearby, and he is, you see, a "wise" politician. Syklo they, if they want to remain our friend, would have offered help to their neighbor long ago, which prevented him from doing it officially, like Russia. Good policy: we sit by the fence, we look at the hole, we hold the ax in our hands.
          And so, we don’t see anything personal — we don’t see anything, we don’t know anything. And the wolves (west) are full, and the sheep (theirs) are whole.
          1. +1
            18 February 2016 12: 54
            Quote: guzik007
            Very "wise" and ours and yours

            Egypt itself miraculously escaped destruction. I don’t know what the situation is now, but I’m afraid that if they intervene, it will end up having to be saved.
          2. VP
            +2
            18 February 2016 13: 16
            What kind of nonsense?
            What is the point for them to go into other people's quarrels in order to prove that it is "not dry" or what?
          3. The comment was deleted.
            1. +3
              18 February 2016 13: 42
              Quote: Tatiana
              It should be noted that in Egypt almost now there is dual power

              there is no dual power there

              Quote: Tatiana
              After the fall of the SOVIET regime of Mubarak in Egypt, radical Islam seriously entrenched in the Sinai

              about there arose for completely different reasons.
              After the signing of peace with Israel. Sinai was a demilitarized zone, and Bedouin clans lived there. which have always been religious enough.
              The police were local, and therefore no, and Egypt could not enter the Army, because of the demilitarized zone.
              while the Bedouins were not prevented from smuggling weapons and drugs, everything was going well. but after they began to pinch. all and mercy.
              But this problem was generally resolved. Israel gave permission to send troops. Sissy wets them quite successfully
              Quote: Tatiana
              In Egyptian media, President Al-Sisi appears to be Nasser's spiritual heir

              Yes, there they are all considered the spiritual heirs of Nasser (including the Saddat 0 who, after his death, turned around 180 degrees, drove the USSR, made peace and went under the wing of the United States
              Quote: Tatiana
              There is progress, but the country is suffocating from overpopulation and must provide youth with work. Islamist activity scares investors away

              Saudi Arabia pays, from the point of view of economic situation, Egypt is now much more stable than under Mubarak, and even more so than under the Muslim Brotherhood
              Quote: Tatiana
              Their interests are related to obtaining bureaucratic and comprador rents, maintaining a course towards preserving the existing order

              The main industry of Egypt in the hands of the military elite and the Army
              Quote: Tatiana
              . If such a position prevails, then the next Islamic revolution in Egypt may become a reality. This is the situation in Egypt.

              Sorry . Tatyana - but you know very little about Egypt
              Quote: Tatiana
              Based on materials from ISIS. The ominous shadow of the Caliphate./ Comp. Andrey Kemal. - M .: Algorithm, 2015. - 224 sec. - (Military observer

              Sorry, this is not you. so he writes complete crap.
              1. +2
                18 February 2016 13: 56
                Dear atalef (Sasha)! Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge about my commentary in accordance with the materials of the presented collection of "Military Review". This is very important for finding and understanding the truth.
                The Bedouins are mentioned in the book, but their world of existence is not revealed at all - it is omitted in the text by the authors of this military collection. Therefore, your remark as a representative from those places is of particular value to us Russians. good

                You +
                1. +1
                  18 February 2016 14: 16
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  Dear atalef (Sasha)! Many thanks


                  Tatyana love
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  Bedouins are mentioned in the book, but their world of existence is not revealed at all

                  Briefly very simple.
                  Bedouins in general arose from people (this happened a very long time ago) - specifically, criminals who were expelled from the peasant communities of Arabs.
                  since the Arabs lived and still live in clans, they had nowhere to go and, in general, these people began to rally in gangs engaged in robbery and abduction of women and, of course, racketeering and collection of duties from passing caravans.
                  They were nomads, and therefore did not belong to any particular territory.
                  Over time, gangs grew, they began to slowly settle. but theft and robbery of 9 as well as counter-gang and drugs) are still being practiced.
                  Wherein . due to their isolation from the roots and some natural selection (as the machine guns physically strong and criminal TOVARISCHI fell into gangs) - they have developed some ideology of their own.
                  Well, in the first place, they began to call themselves Bedouins (unlike peasants - peasants) and developed the theory of their dominant role and almost royal blood. but maybe they were strong, armed and united - few could object to them (the consequences of this we see now. all the royal dynasties of B. Vostok left the Bedouins)
                  In general - the Bedouins are a thief, theft is their main occupation (smuggling and drugs) - they do not want to work and will not.
                  And the most interesting fact is that it’s almost impossible for Bedouins to check on a lie detector, because they lie and believe in it so selflessly. that the detector does not take them.
                  In general, these are the ones that inhabit Sinai (by the way, like the south of Israel)
                  Vorie - nothing more to say.
                  1. -1
                    18 February 2016 14: 46
                    atalef
                    Well, firstly, they began to call themselves Bedouins (unlike the peasants - peasants) and developed the theory of their dominant role and almost royal blood . But since they were strong, armed and united - few could object to them (the consequences of this we see now. All the royal dynasties of B. Vostok emerged from the Bedouins )

                    Alexander! You are telling so interestingly! I believe you. Everything is very logical. But I want to clarify this with you
                    All the royal dynasties of B. Vostok emerged from the Bedouins

                    Are you kidding me? Or is it really true? And where can I read about it?
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +1
                      18 February 2016 15: 10
                      Quote: Tatiana
                      Are you kidding me? Or is it really true? And where can I read about it

                      Yes . Tatyana . write the Bedouins to riches. I hastened a little.
                      I heard this at a lecture, but I did not try to double-check
                      Thanks for fixing.
                      those. generally . they remained the thief. Yes, it didn’t work out of the mud to riches laughing
                      Tenx hi feel
                      1. 0
                        18 February 2016 15: 36
                        atalef
                        ......

                        Thank you Sasha for the information and consultation! Everything you just did perfectly! good
                        I liked it all very much. It was very interesting to talk with you. drinks
                  2. 0
                    19 February 2016 01: 07
                    Quote: atalef
                    Bedouins in general arose from people (this happened a very long time ago) - specifically, criminals who were expelled from the peasant communities of Arabs.

                    Quote: atalef
                    all the royal dynasties of B. Vostok came out of the Bedouins)


                    Something very similar happened in Mongolia - the local analogue of the Bedouins was called "people of long will", from among whom Genghis Khan emerged. Moreover, his descendants in a number of Central Asian countries ruled until 1920 ...

                    And far in the west (in the Maghreb), the people who call themselves "imohag" (= free) to the rest of the world are known as "Tuareg" (= exile), which seems to be hinting ...
                  3. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        18 February 2016 11: 47
        Showered Saudi office Sharash-installation ... Who is the next exit from the Saudi adventure?
        1. +2
          18 February 2016 11: 50
          Quote: Now we are free
          Showered Saudi office Sharash-installation ... Who is the next exit from the Saudi adventure?

          Shiite Bahrain is undoubtedly the next. Ah, the Sauds, it turns out that not everyone can be bought. Can you imagine?
        2. 0
          18 February 2016 12: 25
          Quote: Now we are free
          Showered Saudi office Sharash-montage ..

          That it will be so, from the very beginning even the blondes were clear. I quote:
          Blondy February 9, 2016 15:16 p.m. | Gulf monarchies and Turkey behind the idea of ​​a ground operation in Syria

          In my opinion, there are, after all, too many cunning assists and too few fanatics to go to war on their own. Hire, get sick - you are always lucky, but by yourself - it won’t work
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. 0
        18 February 2016 13: 57
        Hello dear Peter, I have not seen you on the pages of VO for a long time, I think We all lacked the comments of a wise political instructor! Thank you for being!
      5. The comment was deleted.
    2. +7
      18 February 2016 11: 42
      Not the fact that ours. Just doing the right thing, they now have enough of their problems.
      1. +2
        18 February 2016 11: 59
        I agree. Non-intervention, neutrality can be akin to cunning!
    3. +1
      18 February 2016 11: 48
      Right. We made friends with Russia, I gained wisdom. I realized that it’s dangerous against us, it’s scary without us, and calmer with us laughing
      1. +1
        18 February 2016 12: 15
        Quote: Wiruz
        Right. We made friends with Russia, I gained wisdom. I realized that it’s dangerous against us, it’s scary without us, and calmer with us

        I can’t say anything about the song about friendship, but he still has to launder and launder for the blown A321. Moreover, the Russian tourist flow with money is significantly shallow
    4. +1
      18 February 2016 11: 49
      Quote: polite people
      Our person!!! The Egyptians have no hands to go against Russia.

      Well, actually this is not entirely true, in no comment on the Egyptian side will you see the name Assad.
      Quote: polite people
      Cairo will not interfere in intra-Syrian problems, respecting the will of the people of the republic, RIA Novosti reports Egyptian President Abdel al-Sisi

      Absolutely normal statement of Egypt.
      He didn’t and didn’t care about Syrian affairs, and in the light of the long-standing hostility between Syria and Egypt (more precisely, between Mubarok and Assad Papa), they were quite understandable.
      Egypt wishes victory to all sides.
    5. +2
      18 February 2016 11: 49
      Quote: polite people
      Our person!!! The Egyptians have no hands to go against Russia.

      Well, actually this is not entirely true, in no comment on the Egyptian side will you see the name Assad.
      Quote: polite people
      Cairo will not interfere in intra-Syrian problems, respecting the will of the people of the republic, RIA Novosti reports Egyptian President Abdel al-Sisi

      Absolutely normal statement of Egypt.
      He didn’t and didn’t care about Syrian affairs, and in the light of the long-standing hostility between Syria and Egypt (more precisely, between Mubarok and Assad Papa), they were quite understandable.
      Egypt wishes victory to all sides.
    6. +2
      18 February 2016 12: 05
      He would not have bombed Khusitov, he would have done well.
      1. 0
        18 February 2016 19: 29
        Quote: Pereira
        He would not have bombed Khusitov, he would have done well.


        Unfortunately, Egypt cannot be clearly called an ally.

        Yes. he takes steps in relation to Russia - but at the same time he is friends with the Saudis of Qatar - and takes part wherever the Saudis call

        if you have the intelligence not to go against Syria, Iran and Russia - then they have everything ok

        if you don’t have enough mind, then tomorrow they will receive terrorist attacks from Hezbollah for a start - and then something from Iran and Russia
    7. 0
      18 February 2016 12: 30
      Our person!!! The Egyptians have no hands to go against Russia.
      Apparently Vladimir Vladimirovich held political information with al-Sisi .....
    8. 0
      18 February 2016 13: 44
      It was he who made it clear to the Turks and Saudis that they would not rock the boat with the invasion of Syria. Well done.
    9. 0
      18 February 2016 19: 47
      Quote: polite people
      Our person!!! The Egyptians have no hands to go against Russia.

      Egypt officially pulled away from Syria and the Turks in Syria!
  2. +1
    18 February 2016 11: 42
    A very timely statement by Egypt. Egypt has recently been directly pleased with its adequacy. By the way, what about security at their airports? it seems like they were going to establish security together with ours, to return tourism and silence, is work going on or not now?
  3. 0
    18 February 2016 11: 43
    The question is whether they have the resources for military intervention in Syria. Not such a rosy atmosphere in their country. When would the last attack?

    Besides, there are now so many forces there: Syria, the Russian Federation, kudras, ISIS, the USA, Turkey, the SA and someone else. For military operations, good coordination and operational central control are needed, such as in the Russian Federation. Therefore, joining the conflict at the moment is a rather risky action, unless the country has an extraordinary amount of strength to act ahead "like a tank" and not reckon with anyone (as the United States intervenes around the world).
  4. +3
    18 February 2016 11: 47
    The most correct position of Egypt is the preservation of neutrality, and the cleansing of Sinai from the igilov followers.
    Interestingly, Egypt has restored diplomatic relations with Syria? I remember that the predecessor Abdel al-Sisi, after the Muslim brothers came to power, almost broke the relationship with Syria.
    1. +1
      18 February 2016 11: 52
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      The most correct position of Egypt is the preservation of neutrality, and the cleansing of Sinai from the igilov followers.
      Interestingly, Egypt has restored diplomatic relations with Syria? I remember that the predecessor Abdel al-Sisi, after the Muslim brothers came to power, almost broke the relationship with Syria.

      +100500
      1. +2
        18 February 2016 12: 11
        "if they are subjected to any attack or direct threat"
        And Turkey’s shelling of Syria’s territory is, according to Egypt, an attack or a direct threat ?!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    18 February 2016 11: 50
    The first swallow by spring. Soon flocks from the coalition will fly.
  6. +1
    18 February 2016 11: 51
    Something is incomprehensible .. it seems we don’t interfere but are ready to send ...
  7. 0
    18 February 2016 11: 52
    Egypt made it clear to the same Saudis that it would not be dragged into this adventure. Another argument in favor of Egypt. And Saudi Arabia will not climb into the arms of the Ottomans in Syria to fight. Even if she sent 4 or as many as 6 fighters to Turkey. As they arrived, they will fly away.
    1. +1
      18 February 2016 11: 55
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Egypt made it clear to the same Saudis that it would not be dragged into this adventure

      Egypt cannot show anything to the Saudis, as of today, it is the Saudis who contain Israel and the advent of CC was only possible for the support of the Saudis, or rather they stupidly told him - you will get as much money as you need - and they were given
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And Saudi Arabia will not climb into the arms of the Ottomans in Syria to fight.

      Will get
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Even if she sent 4 or whole 6 fighters to Turkey. As they arrived, they will fly away.

      I think Saudi will try to separate the east of Syria with access to the Jordanian border.
      1. 0
        18 February 2016 12: 33
        Quote: atalef
        today it is the Saudis who contain Israel
        ??! Procurement of weapons or what? I used to read somewhere that Israel contains itself, even kibbutzim, they say, are cost-effective above the roof, and Intel without Israel would be a Tupel. Breshet?
        1. +2
          18 February 2016 13: 44
          Quote: Stanislav
          Quote: atalef
          today it is the Saudis who contain Israel
          ??! Procurement of weapons or what? I used to read somewhere that Israel contains itself, even kibbutzim, they say, are cost-effective above the roof, and Intel without Israel would be a Tupel. Breshet?

          Well this is of course my typo. I meant Egypt.
          1. +1
            18 February 2016 13: 52
            Quote: atalef
            it is the Saudis who contain Israel

            Quote: atalef
            Well this is of course my typo. I meant Egypt.

            Yes, not some kind of "slip" atalef so everything is and you just accidentally "gave out" the truth of the Wahhabis and the Zionists are strategic partners.
            Israeli Foreign Minister General: Saudi Arabia is our ally
            Dori Gold, director general of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said at a conference of representatives of Jewish communities in the United States that Saudi Arabia has become a strategic ally of the Jewish state.
            http://newsru.co.il/mideast/31jul2015/gold8007.html
            1. 0
              18 February 2016 14: 30
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Israeli Foreign Secretary General: Saudi Arabia is our ally Israel Foreign Minister General Dori Gold said at a conference of representatives of Jewish communities in the United States that Saudi Arabia has become a strategic ally of the Jewish state.

              They are definitely not our enemies, like the Russian Federation, the CA delegations periodically appear in Russia, you have diplomatic relations.
              GDP has never called the SA an enemy of the Russian Federation.
              What is the problem ? padded jacket laughing
            2. 0
              18 February 2016 14: 30
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Israeli Foreign Secretary General: Saudi Arabia is our ally Israel Foreign Minister General Dori Gold said at a conference of representatives of Jewish communities in the United States that Saudi Arabia has become a strategic ally of the Jewish state.

              They are definitely not our enemies, like the Russian Federation, the CA delegations periodically appear in Russia, you have diplomatic relations.
              GDP has never called the SA an enemy of the Russian Federation.
              What is the problem ? padded jacket laughing
              1. +1
                18 February 2016 14: 38
                Quote: atalef
                They are definitely not our enemies

                Of course, not enemies, it is Israel and Saudi Arabia with Qatar Turkey that finances terrorism in the region.
                Quote: atalef
                GDP has never called the SA an enemy of the Russian Federation.

                But he also did not name allies of Saudi Arabia and Israel calls the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia his own - a STRATEGIC ALLIANCE.
          2. +1
            18 February 2016 14: 01
            Quote: atalef
            my typo
            It happens that we are not Freudians, although Yeltsin once signed the late decree on support, I hope that it no longer applies. wink
          3. +1
            18 February 2016 14: 02
            Israel would have been in the ass for a long time ... without subsidies (there is an article in the US budget for paying Israel) Hello to kibbutz merchants and pray for the owner from behind a puddle!
            1. 0
              18 February 2016 14: 33
              Quote: Mercenary
              Israel would have been in the ass for a long time ... without subsidies

              America does not give Israel a cent in money (exclusively military equipment and only American-made)
              America’s help is not less than 2% of Israel’s budget, there’s nothing to say
              Israeli GDP - 312 billion dollars

              You will count, or help, how much 3.2 billion from 312- ty?
              1. +1
                18 February 2016 15: 02
                Quote: atalef

                Israeli GDP - 312 billion dollars

                You will count, or help, how much 3.2 billion from 312- ty?

                Help me count smile
                And then again you are lying.
                Count yourself the USA gives Israel - 3 billion dollars per year and the budget of Israel per year (2016) is - 347 billion shekels that is, less than $ 100 billion a year.
                http://cursorinfo.co.il/news/busines1/2015/11/19/knesset-utverdil-byudzhet-izrai
                lya-na - godi /
                The dollar against the shekel for today is - 1 dollar = 3.91 shekels.
                It turns out that the United States gives you at least 3% of your annual budget. By the way, your entire MO budget for aggression against neighboring countries with American help is somewhere around 15 billion dollars.
                But this is not enough for you and the Israeli regime wants to beg the United States for more money. One word country - a beggar laughing
                Military Aid Agreement: Jerusalem wants 2,5-5 times more than Washington offers
                During the last round of negotiations held in Israel last week, the US side proposes to increase aid by $ 400 million a year, while the Israeli side expects an increase of $ 1-2 billion a year.
                http://newsru.co.il/finance/14feb2016/siua301.html
            2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. +1
    18 February 2016 11: 52
    still the Yankees and Britons would have such wisdom ... but God gave them only arrogance
  9. +2
    18 February 2016 12: 01
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Egypt’s most correct stance is neutrality,

    In my opinion, Egypt should not sit out, but be an ALLY of Russia in the fight against terrorism. He has Libya from the West (full of extremists), from the East-Wakhabite SA. Secular power is weak, the country is also full of adherents of the same Muslim Brotherhood. The next target is Egypt, as a bridge it will connect the forces of militants in Africa and the Middle East. Better to beat enemies in advance, and not in Cairo! hi
  10. +2
    18 February 2016 12: 04
    And help, weak?
  11. +1
    18 February 2016 12: 05
    Quote: atalef
    I think Saudi will try to separate the east of Syria with access to the Jordanian border.

    But they will not succeed - it is necessary to take into account the position of Russia in matters of Syria, but it has been expressed and is not subject to change so far and, I hope, will remain so! Shish to them with such plans, even if they merge with Perdogan in ecstasy from the vastness of their plans! laughing
  12. -2
    18 February 2016 12: 08
    First, they destroyed the ally of Syria, Egypt, and then took up Syria itself.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. -1
    18 February 2016 12: 37
    That is right. And where will Egypt get from us?
  15. +1
    18 February 2016 12: 42
    If the above is true, then let Egypt come out of the coalition with the KSA against the Yemenite Hussites.
  16. 0
    18 February 2016 13: 33
    Once upon a time they wrote about Erdogan and Turkey. There are no friends in geopolitics, there are partners.
  17. +1
    18 February 2016 13: 56
    So Iraq attacked Kuwait and Egypt helped Kuwait, and if Syria is attacked (open shelling) Turkey, Egypt is wise neutrality?
  18. -1
    18 February 2016 15: 04
    In 1958-1961 there was a state of the UAR - as part of Egypt and Syria. The President of Egypt should remember this time and take the side of Syria, and not observe neutrality! soldier