Russian Foreign Ministry: Washington continues to develop the idea of ​​a "global strike"

70
The United States continues destabilizing actions related to the development of the missile defense system and the development of a “global strike” program, RIA News Statement by Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov.



On Friday, Washington urged Moscow to continue negotiations on further reductions in nuclear weapons. The effective START-3 agreement entered into force in 2011.

“The second circumstance that makes it impossible for us to negotiate further reductions (nuclear weapons) is related to Washington’s ongoing destabilizing activities in areas such as the creation of a global missile defense system, the continued development of means capable of delivering disarming strikes without using nuclear warheads, but at a distance lesions equal to the range of strategic means. I mean the "global strike" program ",
said Ryabkov.

The agency explains that the US "rapid" global strike system "provides for the creation of a hypersonic carrier that can deliver a high-precision non-nuclear strike from American territory to targets on the entire Earth within about an hour after launch."
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    7 February 2016 08: 56
    In Washington, let them not look, more evil than themselves! Once again, Russia did not step on the same rake with the processes of nuclear arms reduction.
    1. +70
      7 February 2016 09: 02
      Yes, we all know this and our grandfathers and great-grandfathers too ...
      Russia is always ready to accept everyone in its "strong embrace" ...
      1. +11
        7 February 2016 09: 08
        Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
        Russia is always ready
        We have a plan for a “global response!” To their idea of ​​a “global strike”.
        1. +9
          7 February 2016 10: 09
          Quote: Pravdarm
          We have a plan for a “global response!” To their idea of ​​a “global strike”.

          I brought the terrible news to your house Hope comrades. A terrible threat from space looms over us! The Americans were able to defeat all the laws of physics, developed and deployed an orbiting super-weapon that would destroy Russia in six seconds. Well, competent specialists from Ukraine say so, but they won’t lie!
          Everything is fine in the text below, so no comment. smile (cry)
          1. cap
            +5
            7 February 2016 10: 46
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Quote: Pravdarm
            We have a plan for a “global response!” To their idea of ​​a “global strike”.

            I brought the terrible news to your house Hope comrades. A terrible threat from space looms over us! The Americans were able to defeat all the laws of physics, developed and deployed an orbiting super-weapon that would destroy Russia in six seconds. Well, competent specialists from Ukraine say so, but they won’t lie!
            Everything is fine in the text below, so no comment. smile (cry)


            If she has a train in her mind, I can imagine what’s in her head! laughing
            1. +4
              7 February 2016 13: 34
              Quote: cap
              If she has a train in her mind, I can imagine what’s in her head!

              ... laughing ... hypersound, hypersound .. as long as they are the maximum, what the X-51A flight achieved at a speed of 5M and 140 seconds. :
              According to the US Air Force Research Laboratory, which participated in the experiment, the X-51A booster stage launched a rocket to a height of 19,8 thousand meters, where a hypersonic ramjet, which accelerated the rocket to 4,8 Mach (5,5 thousand kilometers in hour). After that, the rocket climbed to a height of 21,3 thousand meters and gained a speed of five max. On this, the success of the launch was completed and the incomprehensible began. According to the plan, the rocket was supposed to reach a speed of six max. In this case, the X-51A engine had to work out for 300 seconds, after which the rocket would fall into the Pacific Ocean. Nobody was going to get her out of there. In fact, the rocket engine worked for about 200 seconds, after which the operators sent the X-51A a signal for self-destruction. The reason for this was the abnormal behavior of the vehicle’s onboard equipment - at 140 seconds of the independent flight of the rocket, telemetry data began to arrive intermittently, and communication interruptions became longer. Before launching the rocket, all its components and devices were thoroughly tested.
              ... that is, they were faced with what we overcame in the 80s on the GELA ... the formation of a cloud of cold plasma when the hypersonic apparatus flew for more than 60 seconds. and this plasma does not pass radio waves ... but judging by fragmentary data, our found a solution ... even then ... and by this we don’t hear anything about hypersound in our place ... it’s quiet somewhere that they plan, master and silent ... laughing
          2. +3
            7 February 2016 10: 57
            I am constantly tormented by the question: well, Russia will fall apart, well, the United States will win this war, but what good will it be a nonsense, that they all will be taken all at once or whoever will be there, will take them on their full board, they will carry them on their hands and they will all fulfill their whims to fulfill them ? what kind of good will it be?
            1. +3
              7 February 2016 11: 25
              Well, slaves are also needed, and whoever is Russian will not be blacks
            2. +3
              7 February 2016 14: 50
              Quote: beck
              Well, Russia will fall apart, well, the USA will win in this war

              Sir! Aren't you a state dreamer? And then somehow "fuck ... mom" from this phrase smacks of! We are pushing here, we are raising the economy and defense, and everything is "within tolerance" for you!
              NOOOO NEVER SUITABLE !!!
              Well, if youssers foolishly rock the rock for RUSSIA, then we will bury them and burrow - definitely! The second question: what remains of us ... But let the experts analyze this ... And, based on the territory of the country, everyone says that only Russia has the chance to survive in the last war of this civilization.
              Therefore:
              1. we are not going to fall apart! Vaughn, even the "national idea" the Supreme proclaimed! "Patriotism" is called. So, let us "rally" in a single love ecstasy towards those in power! (About the Motherland - separately! This is sacred);
              2. Only we are capable of burying the "exceptional". China is on its way. This makes amers even more dreary with their exclusivity ...
              3. so tell them and others like them: let them sit on the opera and don’t jerk! Let Hollywood scripts write for decrepit Euro-OPA, how the Arabs rape them ... and they die, but LGBD and tolerance do not betray even deathbed!
              4. obscurantism power in Svidomo will end soon, and then we’ll talk: who, whom, what and how much it owes.
              IMHO.
            3. +2
              7 February 2016 18: 00
              They feel bad not from the fact that their cow is dead, but from the fact that their neighbor is alive!
          3. +2
            7 February 2016 14: 03
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            I brought the terrible news to your home, Nadezhda Comrades.

            Thanks to AMI for the interesting link, those near Ukraine do not understand that 675 days is 2 (two) years, and only 2015 (nine) months have passed since May 9. We’ll lower the strange shells ...
          4. +2
            7 February 2016 17: 03
            One hundred years ago, the female death squad of Kerensky could not keep the Winter Palace from the drunken crowd of sailors and soldiers. In modern times, the women's battalion of Serdyukov was able to disarm one of the largest armies in the world.
          5. 0
            8 February 2016 00: 37
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Well, competent specialists from Ukraine say so, but they won’t lie!
            Everything is fine in the text below, so no comment. smile

            And if the jopies is cut down in advance, or muffled over certain strategic areas? And if something good is also redirected to xoxlooop ?? How can the unshakable xox storytellers be able to comment on this ?? laughing laughing laughing
      2. cap
        +2
        7 February 2016 10: 39
        MIKHALYCH1 (11) RU Today, 09:02
        "Yes, we know all this and our grandfathers and great-grandfathers too ...
        Russia is always ready to accept everyone in its "strong embrace" ... "

        In the USSR it was possible to study geography from them. One had to learn his volume by heart. laughing The language is different but the meaning is the same. drinks For Russia!
      3. +1
        7 February 2016 16: 49
        What to do to Russia? Exposure, exposure and again exposure. The caravan goes, and the dogs bark. There were so many of them at once.
      4. +1
        7 February 2016 20: 57
        Class, and replicate !? I would download and print it out for children fellow SUITABLE !!!! wink
    2. +3
      7 February 2016 09: 06
      How to look for what is not ????
      1. +2
        7 February 2016 09: 15
        We have an "asymmetric" answer! If Putin gets offended and stops answering Obama's calls.
    3. +36
      7 February 2016 09: 14
      The second circumstance, which deprives us of the opportunity to negotiate further reductions (of nuclear weapons), is associated with the continuing destabilizing activities of Washington in such areas as the creation of a global missile defense system, the continued development of means capable of delivering disarming strikes without using nuclear warheads, but at a range equal to the range of strategic weapons. I mean the global strike program,

      Yes, believe the mattresses, to destroy the country. hi
      1. +7
        7 February 2016 10: 36
        And what? - great idea. I give an approximate text of the justifying statement.
        Russia, fearing a US preventive or retaliatory strike against the DPRK, which will inevitably lead to radioactive contamination of the vast southeastern regions of the Russian Far East, and on the basis that the DPRK's priority goal is to protect Russian interests, decided to prevent the negative effect of a possible DPRK missile attack to the United States and deploy, by agreement with the Cuban government, its missile defense assets in Cuba, which will significantly increase the response time to a possible attack.

        It remains to negotiate with Cuba, the United States can not be asked, since it is about ensuring Russian security.
      2. +6
        7 February 2016 11: 03
        we rode Cuba, and no matter what trump card we now had in our hands !!! I hate the liberals who blew everything !!!
    4. +9
      7 February 2016 09: 22
      Quote: avvg
      In Washington, let them not look, more evil than themselves! Once again, Russia did not step on the same rake with the processes of nuclear arms reduction.

      Russia today is reaping the benefits of Gorbachev’s treacherous policy in the disarmament of our nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles. And, apparently, we are stepping on the heels of the Americans, since they are fussing again and are asking again to "step on the rake."
  2. +32
    7 February 2016 08: 58
    On closer inspection, the feathered symbol of America is like a plucked rooster, obo ... gulls
    1. +4
      7 February 2016 13: 09
      It seems to me alone that the bird is "under the bulldozer"?
  3. +7
    7 February 2016 09: 04
    Megamaniacs of the Pentagon are planning to "win" a nuclear war ... do not be ashamed of the first persons of the state to talk about it more often .... So far there is too much "halva" in the spirit of the "Russell-Einstein manifesto"
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. +7
    7 February 2016 09: 04
    We must diplomatically respond to US calls, while realizing that negotiating with them is pointless. The United States will continue to tighten the ring around the Russian Federation, and calls for the limitation of any weapons mean only that this type of weaponry is being replaced by the states with an updated, more effective one, but not falling under the restriction.
    1. +2
      7 February 2016 11: 09
      Quote: olimpiada15
      calls for the limitation of any weapons mean only that this type of weapons by states is replaced by an updated, more effective, but not subject to limitation
      Not necessarily, although in this case, most likely it is - this is their missile defense. They have any "peacekeeping initiative" with a stone in their bosom, without this "Western partners" cannot at all. Their claims to world domination are camouflaged (and from the Americans themselves) with the term "globalization", like, "we do not strive for this, it turns out that way, life itself (options: Providence, objective laws, etc.) leads to this ". If Marx wrote that the interests of the proletariat coincide at some stage with the interests of the historical development of all mankind, then today most Americans seem to be convinced that the interests of the United States around the world are universal. If other countries have their own interests, different from the claims of the "hegemon", then they are automatically attributed to the pole (empire, axis, etc.) of Evil. Of course, I don’t know how this is done in real life, but I suppose that such “calls for peace” are predicted by our military analysts, and the Foreign Ministry prepares counter proposals in advance, which also includes the “stone” that these “peacekeepers” hold in their bosom.
  5. +8
    7 February 2016 09: 07
    Thanks to Boris Yeltsin for the 500 tonnes of Russian uranium given to America. Now they have done rockets and bombs, and our liberals shit-guns cut rockets and flooded the mines. Here is the result. It is necessary to restore parity, otherwise war and a nuclear winter, there will be no winners.
    1. +1
      7 February 2016 09: 14
      Well, let's just say, with the world along the line of a poor shirt, the Japanese have also been squeezed a lot, and all over the world.
    2. +2
      7 February 2016 09: 16
      Quote: vglazunov
      Thanks to Boris Yeltsin

      But really thanks! What opened his eyes to all of us ... Now all the masks are open! Russia finally realized WHO HER MAJOR ALLY!
    3. +2
      7 February 2016 09: 54
      vglazunov (1) RU Today, 09:07 New

      Thanks to Boris Yeltsin
      In 2014, before the opening of the Olympiad, the news was heard in the media (source: Russia TV channel) that: "The Russian Federation provides all members of the judging with an Audi Q5 car and a month of paid maintenance in Audi services in Sochi. At the end of the Olympiad, I do not think who He demanded to hand over the car from these members (judging). Today these members put pressure on us with sanctions, according to whose request. Who should I say thanks? It's in our blood, comrades, even if it is unprofitable and does not bring any benefit. As for the article, I am glad that we are starting to wake up little by little and we have less and less illusions in relation to our Western "partners".
      1. +2
        7 February 2016 10: 03
        In general, after the Olympics, all winners were given cars.
    4. +2
      7 February 2016 09: 59
      Quote: vglazunov
      Thanks to Boris Yeltsin for the 500 tonnes of Russian uranium given to America.

      It was such a thing. On the one hand - the biggest betrayal, on the other - an unexpected side effect, uranium enrichment in the United States ruined this.
      Quote: vglazunov
      Now they have done rockets and bombs, and our liberals shit-guns cut rockets and flooded the mines.

      Enchanting nonsense! The Americans did not produce anything from this uranium. And our Strategic Rocket Forces are probably the only branch of the armed forces whose combat readiness remained at the proper level, even in the worst of times.
      Quote: vglazunov
      It is necessary to restore parity, otherwise war and a nuclear winter, there will be no winners.

      At the end of 2014, strategic parity (in terms of the number of nuclear charges) with the United States was achieved. They are ahead in terms of the number of carriers, but we have a different strategic nuclear forces structure with them.
      1. -1
        7 February 2016 18: 03
        Did the Americans not make anything or print in the newspapers?
        It's a pity, but not everyone is so naive :)
    5. +3
      7 February 2016 10: 01
      There can be no "nuclear winter" physically - this has already been proven by historical facts, but at the expense of nuclear parity, now the United States has 1640 strategic warheads, and Russia has 1680 - we already have parity.
      1. 0
        7 February 2016 10: 15
        Quote: Vadim237
        There can be no "nuclear winter" physically - this has already been proven by historical facts, but at the expense of nuclear parity, now the United States has 1640 strategic warheads, and Russia has 1680 - we already have parity.


        If only we and the United States have 3320 warheads, plus or minus, yes Britain-France, yes Pakistan-India, and Israel-S. Korea ... And if most of this smells, mostly over land, which on Earth and so not much, what will it be then, if not complete w ...?
      2. 0
        7 February 2016 17: 56
        Thank God that the theory has not been tested in practice. America is fighting in the wrong hands, you need to summarize the number of warheads according to the formula: USA + NATO + US allies = Russia
        The possibility of a nuclear winter was predicted by G.S. Golitsyn in the USSR and Karl Sagan in the USA, then this hypothesis was confirmed by model calculations of the Computing Center of the USSR Academy of Sciences. This work was carried out by academician N.N. Moiseev and professors V.V. Aleksandrov and Stenchikov G.L.
        1. 0
          7 February 2016 20: 49
          Nature itself conducted these experiments and more than once - with super-powerful volcanic eruptions, one of them is the most powerful in the history of human observation of volcanoes - the eruption of Tambora volcano, according to estimates, the eruption power was 800 megatons while 140 billion tons of ash and soot were thrown into the stratosphere and dust, and then this did not lead to a global ice age and the death of all life on the planet, and the science fiction writers of "Nuclear Winter", when they release 150 million tons of dust and 500 million tons of soot into the stratosphere, will lower the temperature to minus 50 in northern latitudes and minus 20 at the equator - the volcano ejected 217 times more than these scientists dreamed of in their theory - that is, if you adhere to their calculations - we should have died 217 times after this eruption in 1815, and the Earth will turn into one big Antarctica, but on the contrary we are alive, now it is February and outside the window is +2 degrees.
      3. 0
        7 February 2016 19: 51
        Quote: Vadim237
        There can be no "nuclear winter" physically - this has already been proven by historical facts
        In physics, historical facts are taken as evidence? Then why is the call of alternative physicists not visible in the divan troops of VO?
        1. 0
          7 February 2016 20: 56
          The physical - historical facts are accepted, and the alternative physicists are the creators of the theory of Nuclear Winter - they created the theory themselves and believed in it, and for one made everyone else believe in their fantasies - we have many scientists who love to embellish reality.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            9 February 2016 09: 15
            Quote: Vadim237
            physicists - alternative specialists are precisely the creators of the theory of nuclear winter
            NLM, here we are not talking about alternative physics, but about the accuracy of calculations. Powerful volcanic emissions regularly reduce the average annual temperature - this is a historical fact. What can be the emission of soot and ash into the stratosphere while simultaneously undermining 30-40% of the global stock of nuclear warheads - a debatable question, no?
  6. +1
    7 February 2016 09: 11
    For a long time it was necessary to dig up charges on their territory ...
  7. +6
    7 February 2016 09: 14
    In no case should Russia follow Washington’s lead. All the ideas of Americans in the field of security, even those that at first glance have good intentions, in the end turn out to be beneficial only to the states themselves in their struggle for world domination.
  8. +2
    7 February 2016 09: 14
    Agreeing with America about anything is like sitting down to play cards with a notorious sharpie.
  9. +4
    7 February 2016 09: 17
    It’s necessary to reassure partners! We have the cleanest vacuum bombs in the world and I am also environmentally friendly, we really haven’t tried but who can forbid us to say so?
  10. +11
    7 February 2016 09: 18
    So disastrously "decreased"- and this is in conditions when nuclear weapons are the only real and absolute guarantee against aggression, annexation and democratization.



  11. +5
    7 February 2016 09: 20
    Newly appeared, incompetent adventurers and careerists, blinded by vanity in their "exclusiveness", "omnipotence" and underestimation of the enemy, the security forces and not only the US departments, are taking quantitative superiority over the sane. They do not even represent the whole abyss of consequences to which they go by leaps and bounds. There is always a BACKUP option, and the "exceptional" brain perceives this as a bluff, and this is already really scary.
    1. +2
      7 February 2016 09: 30
      Quote: Red_Hamer
      Newly appeared, incompetent adventurers and careerists, blinded by vanity in their "exclusiveness", "omnipotence" and underestimation of the enemy, the security forces and not only the US departments, are taking quantitative superiority over the sane. They do not even represent the whole abyss of consequences to which they go by leaps and bounds. There is always a BACKUP option, and the "exceptional" brain perceives this as a bluff, and this is already really scary.

      Well, you wrote a pancake! drinks I re-read it three times ... The brains straightened up, then twisted again ..!)))) I’ll go and give a hundred more waves ... drinks
  12. +3
    7 February 2016 09: 24
    Negotiations can be conducted, but to give some sort of promise, or to sign all sorts of papers, God forbid!
  13. +2
    7 February 2016 09: 24
    They "culturally" offer us to reduce nuclear weapons. This is the same as that you will be offered to fight, but on the condition that the enemy will be with a stick, and you will be without and on your knees. They cleverly contrived to the ground that they themselves can no longer figure out anything, because they have locked themselves in on "exclusivity."
    1. +1
      7 February 2016 10: 06
      Quote: rotmistr60
      fight, but with the condition that the enemy will be with a stick, and you are without and on your knees.

      The mill imprints from the knee to the tatami, as if the opponent was thrown from the 3rd floor, or maybe not in a sporty way - on the head. "Partners" need to think hard about what Little Johnny does in his free time.
      Well, we continue to publicly remove old systems and launch into space and put new ones on the database without noise and dust
  14. +2
    7 February 2016 09: 27
    The United States has never fully complied with the terms of any strategic agreements. That just did not come up with, that it was beneficial only to them. It’s time to take off their masks, and Russia should be very careful about such agreements, you can’t constantly step on the same rake.
  15. +3
    7 February 2016 09: 35
    Russia is not a territory to fear a "global strike". The otvetku is where to hide.
    Therefore, these are all American "show-off horror stories" to show their power to vassals, so that they
    Do not run away from your weak master.
  16. +2
    7 February 2016 09: 35
    America is a series of those wanderers who, even if they lie on the ground without the possibility of doing anything, will still think how to conquer the whole world.
    1. +4
      7 February 2016 09: 44
      Quote: dchegrinec
      they will equally think how to conquer the whole world.

      Robbing, fighting is not their thing.
  17. +5
    7 February 2016 09: 40
    And let's bash on the bash-reduction of our nuclear weapons in exchange for the reduction of states in America in the ratio of three warheads minus one state?
    1. +4
      7 February 2016 16: 16
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      downsizing of our nuclear weapons in exchange for downsizing in america

      About all The burning progenitor of the Olympic gods!
      Surely you saw this picture !? laughing
  18. +2
    7 February 2016 09: 53
    Enough new cuts! The limit has been reached. According to the same Ryabkov, we reached the level of the beginning of the 60s. And other countries (China, for example) are increasing their nuclear capabilities.
    1. 0
      7 February 2016 10: 09
      The time will come and the hypersonic weapon will partially displace the nuclear one, in the USA and China work on such weapons is in full swing, but what do we have in this direction?
      1. +3
        7 February 2016 16: 54
        Quote: Vadim237
        in the USA and China, work on such weapons (GZO) is in full swing, but what do we have in this direction?

        Ours assert that the GZO is already going through the stage of "military trials".
        Speaking about the "project 4202" or the Ju-71 with hypersonic speeds, the American media refer to Jane's Information Group and give many colorful details. They believe that the first hypersonic missiles (or some new strategic missiles with hypersonic booster blocks) number 25. should take up combat duty in the Dombarovsky regiment of the Strategic Missile Forces in the period from 2020 to 2025. For the United States (as confirmed by the sources in Moscow), this would mean the destruction of the entire system of strategic nuclear weapons and missile defense.
        According to some reports, in Russia, work to create a new hypersonic missile (or even a whole family of devices with similar characteristics) resumed five years ago and is very active. They are occupied at once by several design bureaus, and not as in the USSR - only "Rainbow". Experimental launches were really made. Whether this device was Yu-71 or some other is a secondary issue. But if he really reached a speed of 11 200 km / h in dense layers of the atmosphere (that is, the same as the American project that has reached a dead end) - this is a serious breakthrough. This is a real opportunity to reach a new level of technology, which will leave far behind the entire existing and even promising American missile defense system.
        But there is very little data due to the secrecy of the project, so we will wait for the "postman Pechkin". hi
        1. 0
          7 February 2016 21: 00
          In general, 4202 is the combat equipment of ICBMs - a maneuvering nuclear warhead, it began to be tested in 2007, on the UR 100UTTX missile.
  19. +7
    7 February 2016 09: 57
    Nowhere to further reduce!

    Approved 1550 warheads on 700 deployed carriers - in conditions when the missile defense system does not limit anything, even fill the entire earth with anti-ballistic missiles - and they do not give a reliable guarantee.

    On the contrary, one must take advantage of the available opportunities. According to START-3, one bomber is counted as one carrier of one charge, despite the fact that there can be many cruise missiles. Hence the heavy Tu-160 is better than the Tu-95; he carries more missiles and does not violate anything.

    The separable warhead is more efficient than a monoblock of greater power. But the charges are limited, but the power is not. Therefore, heavy missiles with hrh are better than light; since the power of a single block can be increased to any value without violating anything.

    The TNW is not limited by anything, therefore, it is necessary to produce and store warheads for it so that all sorts of young NATO troops do not think that Russian strategists are aimed at the United States, and nothing will happen to them.

    No one can prohibit the deployment of TNW anywhere in a sovereign state; therefore, its carriers must be pushed towards friendly NATO; to the Crimea and Kaliningrad - so that not only the Pedro-Poles were afraid, but also the completely decomposed Germans.

    SNF must be dispersed; hide in the taiga; Mount on BZHRK. Why not push the strategic division to Franz Joseph Land, for example? To amer’s bloody diarrhea occurs not after the use of nuclear weapons, but before. Let them try to place their Aegis in the Arctic Ocean. And so their aircraft carriers wander wherever they hit - but in the Arctic - no.
  20. +1
    7 February 2016 09: 58
    The country with the most aggressive military-political system offers a system for reducing nuclear weapons. Is it like wolves offering to demolish fences in a sheepfold? And how to submit it correctly, how to offer peacekeeper Obama, you can get another prize directly.
    Here is a continuous circus ..............
  21. +1
    7 February 2016 10: 00
    P "RѕRІRѕSЂRoRј RЎRORђ - RїRѕRґSЂR ° F · ° SѓRјRμRІR RμRј RІRѕRμRЅRЅRѕRμ P" RѕR ± R ± Ryo RїSЂRѕSЃS,RѕRјSѓ P ° ° RјRμSЂRoRєR RЅS † Sѓ RґR ° R¶Rμ RЅRμ SЏSЃRμRЅ SЃRјS <SЃR "RІSЃRμS ... SЌS,RoS ... RґRμR№ ствий, РґР ° РѕРЅРё Рё РІРЅРёРєР ° ть РЅРµ СЃРѕР ± РёСЂР ° ются.
  22. +2
    7 February 2016 10: 44
    I will be extremely honest! War as such, I do not want. But if they scrape and poke ideas about global blows to Russia, and even try to implement something like that ... Here you have to answer the slander feel And after that, let them not blame am
  23. 0
    7 February 2016 11: 13
    Quote: Vadim237
    There can be no "nuclear winter" physically - this has already been proven by historical facts,


    if one volcano in Iceland, with an unpronounceable name, covered the sky over Europe for an umpteenth of the time, what will happen when all the nuclear charges explode, how many volcanoes will wake up under this pipe, remember Pompeii ....
    1. +1
      7 February 2016 12: 13
      I remember the eruption of the Tambor volcano, "I closed the sky over Europe for a certain amount of time," I'm sorry, for whom I closed it - sunlight or civil aviation flights.
    2. +1
      7 February 2016 15: 22
      Quote: beck
      Quote: Vadim237
      There can be no "nuclear winter" physically - this has already been proven by historical facts,


      if one volcano in Iceland, with an unpronounceable name, covered the sky over Europe for an umpteenth of the time, what will happen when all the nuclear charges explode, how many volcanoes will wake up under this pipe, remember Pompeii ....

      And what does the volcano and nuclear weapons have to do with it? These are completely different things.
      1. +1
        7 February 2016 16: 53
        “And what have a volcano and nuclear weapons got to do with it? These are completely different things.” - According to the fantasies of scientists about Nuclear Winter, a sharp drop in temperature on the ground will lead to the release of a huge amount of dust and soot from the explosions of thousands of thermonuclear warheads and subsequent fires - here we are we compare them with the emissions of ash, soot and dust during volcanic eruptions, and it must be admitted that the emissions of volcanoes into the stratosphere are several tens of thousands times more productive than during the explosions of thermonuclear bombs.
  24. +3
    7 February 2016 11: 15
    Cool position - break your sword, I’ll also break mine, though I still have a few spare ones, but that’s not important ...
  25. +1
    7 February 2016 11: 18
    I think they have experience ruining the country without using nuclear weapons. Most likely, we ourselves will get over each other than nuclear weapons will be used.
    1. 0
      7 February 2016 11: 43
      Give light RU
      There are many options: to give, squander, squander, forgive someone lard, in the end they themselves will die out as mammoths, we will rebuild the Slavs ... everyone has enough experience.
  26. +1
    7 February 2016 12: 00
    I agree, Americans need to be restrained, just don’t step on the rake of the budget depletion during the arms race, because the Yankees can deliberately drag us into the race for our depletion, as they once did
  27. +2
    7 February 2016 12: 32
    Quote: NOC-VVS
    Nki can deliberately drag us into the race for our exhaustion, as they once already did

    We won’t do it this time!
  28. +2
    7 February 2016 13: 14
    Listen to americos and do the opposite!
    To absorb this truth is better with mother's milk.
    1. 0
      7 February 2016 21: 40
      Do not be like ukram! Russia told them that it would be very bad for them after a close relationship with Geyropa and Matrasia and that they listened and did the opposite! It’s better to listen and think about how to do it for yourself, and not for someone else!
  29. 0
    7 February 2016 13: 43
    It was high time this was done to withdraw from the disarmament treaty and the INF Treaty.
    1. +1
      7 February 2016 16: 55
      And then at their side will appear theirs medium-range ballistic missiles.
      1. 0
        7 February 2016 21: 44
        Then Russia can withdraw part of the strategic missiles beyond the Urals and get a guaranteed answer, well, for one launch on Mattress anyway!
        1. 0
          7 February 2016 22: 17
          This withdrawal beyond the Urals, parts of nuclear forces - will ruin us.
  30. 0
    7 February 2016 14: 41
    Well, America made its proposal, Japan its ...
    I have the right to ask, just as we have the right to answer.
    When he who solved the issues. essentially turned into nothing
    only guaranteed destruction of the territory of the aggressor
    holding back the world from another global war.
    So the Americans are somewhat out of place with their proposal.
    Ah, wang another splash of Tagged,
    which will call for zeroing out nuclear arsenals all over the planet.
  31. 0
    7 February 2016 19: 27
    Quote: cap
    If she has a train in her mind, I can imagine what’s in her head!

    So it’s said there’s no head - one cast iron, like the jumping Maidan and admirers of Ukrofascist Bandera! laughing laughing laughing
  32. 0
    7 February 2016 19: 37
    Quote: NOC-VVS
    I agree, Americans need to be restrained, just don’t step on the rake of the budget depletion during the arms race, because the Yankees can deliberately drag us into the race for our depletion, as they once did

    The budget of the USSR was exhausted not by the arms race, but by a stupid foreign policy for the sake of which money went to African countries to carry out socialist revolutions there, as bequeathed by Mr. Trotsky, whose followers J.V. Stalin subjected to repression for the purpose of re-education, but the author of the permanent revolution himself bumped an alpenstock on the head, so as not to excite the masses with beautiful but harmful speeches! If only our liberal elite did not surrender the country before we get involved in this "running around". Although already now our developments of hypersonic weapons are ahead of the US ones thanks to the backlog of the 70s and 80s of the last century.soldier
    1. 0
      7 February 2016 21: 06
      "Although already now our development of hypersonic weapons is ahead of the US ones thanks to the backlog of the 70s and 80s of the last century." What are they ahead of? Our backlog of the 70s - 80s on hypersonic weapons, including on the aerospace forces, was safely lost 15 years after the collapse of the USSR.
      1. 0
        7 February 2016 21: 46
        I hope no.
  33. 0
    7 February 2016 21: 49
    More bombs for the usa, ganglia, switzerland, monte carlo ... don't mind!