Iran withdrew anti-aircraft missile lawsuit against Russia

January 11 2016 50

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin told the media that Iran had withdrawn the lawsuit against Russia from international arbitration. We are talking about a lawsuit that official Tehran fielded against Moscow for disrupting the contract to supply Iran with the C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems.
RIA News cites a fragment of Dmitry Rogozin's statement:

C-300 system deliveries are contractual. He signed last year. Deliveries begin with the receipt of funds. They have already arrived at the accounts of the relevant Russian organizations, and the contract is currently underway. We receive guarantees from Tehran to withdraw the claim due to non-delivery.

Iran withdrew anti-aircraft missile lawsuit against Russia

It must be recalled that the contract for the supply of C-300 air defense systems to Iran was concluded in the 2007 year. The total value of the contract is about 0,9 billion. Subsequently, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution No. XXUMX, which prohibited the supply of offensive weapons to Iran. Despite the fact that the C-1929 anti-aircraft missile systems had nothing to do with offensive weapons, the president (at that time) Dmitry Medvedev ordered to freeze the implementation of the contract. After that, Iran filed a lawsuit against Russia in international arbitration. According to some reports, the amount of the claim was about 300 billion dollars.

In April 2015, President Vladimir Putin signed a document that authorizes the delivery of C-300 air defense systems to Iran.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

A-Sim

+13

11 January 2016 16: 34

A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling
1. vlad66
  
  +40
  
  11 January 2016 16: 36
  
  Quote: A-Sim
  A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling
  
  Well, the most important partner in these knots is now sitting in the place of the Prime Minister of Russia.
  1. Saratoga833
    
    +14
    
    11 January 2016 16: 59
    
    Does Putin really not understand who he is holding as prime minister of Russia?
    1. SRC P-15
      
      +9
      
      11 January 2016 17: 06
      
      Quote: Saratoga833
      Does Putin really not understand who he is holding as prime minister of Russia?
      
      Putin just keeps his word. What is very rare in this mortal world.
      1. Weyland
        
        +3
        
        11 January 2016 23: 24
        
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        Putin just keeps his word. What is very rare in this mortal world.
        
        And completely in vain! For a politician, this is a serious flaw:
        "The sovereign must break his word of honor if necessary (Machiavelli," Il Principe "). In relation to Berezovsky, Putin acted as Machiavelli advises - and did the right thing! But regarding EBN and iPhone - alas ...
2. seti
  
  +16
  
  11 January 2016 16: 39
  
  Quote: A-Sim
  A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling
  
  It would be good if the military-trade partnership did not end there. After lifting the sanctions, Iran is a very attractive military market and it is better that we arm it than someone else. We can sell them with a clear conscience T-90 and Su-30. This does not strain our defense order and at the same time significantly strengthen the army of Iran. At the same time, we’ll load our manufacturer well.
3. Ami du peuple
  
  +10
  
  11 January 2016 16: 41
  
  Quote: A-Sim
  A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling
  
  What nafig partners? This is the current Prime Minister, as President of the Russian Federation, decided not to supply Iran with air defense systems, which, however, did not fall under any international sanctions.
  In a good way, he should have hung all the costs associated with the Iranian contract. But, you see, everything was resolved to universal satisfaction.
  So what if Medvedev D.A. partner for you - I sympathize with you. Can throw.
  1. KBR109
    
    +5
    
    11 January 2016 16: 55
    
    Do you really think that the Tsar is good, but the boyars come across all the unsuccessful?
  2. Saratoga833
    
    +2
    
    11 January 2016 16: 57
    
    This Medvedev has long been no longer in the Russian government, and not only in the government! On the bunks it is the place!
    1. AUL
      
      +2
      
      11 January 2016 17: 35
      
      So this ... What a pop, such is the coming!
      1. mirag2
        
        +3
        
        11 January 2016 17: 46
        
        So the process of "removing from the oil needle" the economy of the Russian Federation has begun. The liberals in the first place shouted about it so much.
        In Iran, the S-300, and even there our civilian aircraft, and even in Egypt, an industrial cluster.
        In 2014, the share of non-oil exports (together with the export of services) amounted to more than half of all exports - 51,5%. In 2013, exports of non-primary goods amounted to $ 251 billion, in 2014 - already $ 286 billion.
      2. RUSOIVAN
        
        +2
        
        11 January 2016 17: 53
        
        how it sounds: a traitor to the Russian government!
4. remy
  
  +2
  
  11 January 2016 22: 17
  
  A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling
  
  in the Caspian, they will deliver everything very quickly, they will teach, they will pair for information with our automated control system ...
  and you can shoot down !!!!
5. meriem1
  
  +1
  
  12 January 2016 06: 12
  
  Quote: A-Sim
  A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling
  
  Partners ??? A partner with the surname Medvedev. He really liked it. Question to whom ??? And politics is the prerogative’s domestic prerogative ....
Mikhail Krapivin

+17

11 January 2016 16: 34

Let them use it so that Israel does not live so freely in the sky of Iran.
1. Major Yurik
  
  +6
  
  11 January 2016 16: 45
  
  Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
  Let them use it so that Israel does not live so freely in the sky of Iran.
  
  Mdya, as Sharikov would say: .. And where am I going to camp now!
  Now, before flying, wherever you want, you will need to think: Do we need it?
2. Luga
  
  +1
  
  11 January 2016 16: 54
  
  Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
  Let them use it so that Israel does not live so freely in the sky of Iran.
  
  Oh, these anti-Semites to me ... C'mon, what does Israel have to do with it? Where is Israel and where is Iran? But air defense missile systems on alert along the border with Turkey, Iraq and the coast of the bay will make someone else nervous, that's for sure. Gaddafi and Hussein did not have them, Assad did not have them, in order to protect him our fleet had to be kept off the coast of Syria. It will now be easier for Iran to communicate with the Turks. And the Saudis have something to lift into the air, if that. So it is necessary, it was high time.
  1. padded jacket
    
    +5
    
    11 January 2016 17: 01
    
    Quote: Luga
    Oh, these anti-Semites to me ... recourse C'mon, what does Israel have to do with it?
    
    For a long time everyone knows the Israeli regime, even when it sleeps, dreams about how it bombes and destroys Iran.
Pereira

+7

11 January 2016 16: 35

Something was busy for a long time. Messages about the start of delivery of complexes have long been. Waited for delivery to complete?
1. padded jacket
  
  +8
  
  11 January 2016 16: 37
  
  Quote: Pereira
  Something was busy for a long time. Messages about the start of delivery of complexes have long been. Waited for delivery to complete?
  
  Most likely, remembering about the past "deception" they simply dropped the claim as soon as the first complexes came to their territory.
alekc73

+11

11 January 2016 16: 35

It was necessary to immediately fulfill the contract. Without looking back to the West. The more inferior, the more we were pressured.
1. Ingvar 72
  
  -5
  
  11 January 2016 16: 40
  
  Quote: alekc73
  .Without looking west.
  
  As if without looking back, when the bills are there, the real estate is there, the children study there.
  What is happening now reminds me of a game of chess, and chess players (the West and "our" government) are not friends of Russia (better to say the Russian people).
  A few days ago I watched a video of Strelkov spat upon by everyone. Clever things are saying. For Syria, for Ukraine, and for power.
  1. Yasen Ping
    
    +2
    
    11 January 2016 17: 31
    
    Whoever said anything about him and he didn’t speak, if not for him, then there would have been no Novorosia ...
  2. DobryAAH
    
    +5
    
    11 January 2016 17: 54
    
    Clever things are saying. For Syria, for Ukraine, and for power.
    
    Syrian adventure? These are his words.
    Yes, and it’s easy to criticize, but how does a person want to build an economy? If he believes that the image of Nicholas 2 hung on the wall, and the thing is in the hat, then it will be bad. How many people have already bought with beautiful words and gestures, and then the hair on the ass tore.
    After Putin we will have the smartest ruler, but this is definitely not Strelkov.
    1. Ingvar 72
      
      0
      
      11 January 2016 18: 40
      
      Quote: Good AAAH
      Syrian adventure? These are his words
      
      Yes him. He explains by facts that Novorossiya merges quietly to applause the actions of the videoconferencing in Syria, and confirms with concrete facts that are very difficult to argue with. Independent leaders of New Russia are removed (planted or killed). Coal supplies to Ukraine continue with the Akhmetovsky mines. The aggravation of hostilities is hushed up (on New Year's Eve heavy fights, and our media did not report ANYTHING). Many markers, no need to close your eyes.
      I constantly tell all people trying to discredit Strelkova - guys, you should not pull words out of context. Quote the message in its entirety and say what you disagree with. And do not repeat Starikov's mantras.
      1. DobryAAH
        
        +1
        
        11 January 2016 18: 51
        
        Are you ready to feed Ukraine with our frail economy due to the capture of New Russia? If we didn’t immediately gnaw after Crimea, now we need to wait for the time when NATO forces will enter Ukraine, and for now rearm. Only then will it be possible to beat partners with all their might and not be afraid. This will be the first war, and then drive partners until the complete surrender of everything. Time is coming, either we or they. But we’re better. Ukrainians are already secondary here. In Ukraine, NATO has already crossed the red line, in vain they did it.
        
        Ingvar 72
        
        +3
        
        11 January 2016 19: 40
        
        Quote: Good AAAH
        Are you ready to feed Ukraine with our frail economy due to the capture of New Russia?
        
        Now we feed Chechnya, in advance for good behavior. Novorossia with its coal and heavy industry will feed itself better than Crimea.
        Quote: Good AAAH
        If you didn’t immediately gnaw after Crimea,
        
        I agree, it was necessary immediately. But it’s not worth it to merge, or at least recognize the republic. Why are they worse than Abkhazia or South Ossetia? And there now ...
        Quote: Good AAAH
        In the meantime, rearm. Only then will it be possible to beat partners with all their might and not be afraid.
        
        To do this, we need to raise the economy with Stalinist methods, and not feed the people with fairy tales.
        
        DobryAAH
        
        +1
        
        11 January 2016 20: 50
        
        South Africa is a malipuz, but Ukraine is still a good size. Export industries - metallurgy and chemical industry.
        Ukraine supplies oils and fats of vegetable and animal origin, metals and fertilizers, to Poland - slag, ash, as well as electrical installations. The basis of the commodity structure of the country's exports is ore, metals and metal products. Over the past few years, the export abroad of chemical industry products and those industries that are directly related to it has slightly decreased. Metallurgical enterprises are leading export shipments.
        
        More details: http://www.kakprosto.ru/kak-818298-chto-eksportiruet-ukraina#ixzz3wxVE16Tj
        
        They intersect with ours, instantly we get sanctions on them. In the domestic market will have to make room. Everyone is howling now, and even then they would turn around. They could still get a new Vietnam at hand, with the help of the remaining Ukraine’s weapons. Therefore, I say that it is necessary to beat in parts of NATO and immediately seriously so that the porridge is brewed.
        
        shuhartred
        
        0
        
        12 January 2016 01: 09
        
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        To do this, we need to raise the economy with Stalinist methods, and not feed the people with fairy tales.
        
        Well here again. We moved from an interesting topic to the ruin. I’d better explain what you’re explaining, but can’t you use the S-300 as an assault weapon? I remember about the S-75 that something was said. An anti-aircraft missile is not a small thing and, with the corresponding warhead, can do it.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Sea Wolf
      
      +5
      
      11 January 2016 19: 31
      
      The levels are different. And the experience is different. It's just that many people are dizzy from success. It seems to them that they really understand everything and know how. The deepest error. But Putin is not one of those. Heather, smart, attracts a huge army of analysts. Absolutely not being fooled. What he has done for Russia, our children and grandchildren will still have to evaluate. I am sure will do more. I also like that it does not cut the shoulder, it measures a hundred times. It goes like a mountain yak along the Pamir trail. So a competent navigator does. There are some captains who, over time, think that they know the sea and go easily everywhere, gradually complacency sets in. This is where the accident comes from. I remember in the Splitsky Strait that the master didn’t turn in time, he stood and looked and looked. The navigator already tells him the turn, He yes, yes. Yes, and from full speed dug into the shore.
      1. DobryAAH
        
        +1
        
        11 January 2016 20: 54
        
        For the bloodless capture of Crimea - a monument and respect for many years. Who else could? Crimea just from = under the nose taken away.
  3. g1v2
    
    +2
    
    11 January 2016 23: 13
    
    Well, in my opinion, Strelkov-Girkin is a simple performer, and his owners are actively cooperating with amers and the beginning of events in Slavyansk is an operation aimed at giving mattress toppers an excuse to stifle the peaceful and relatively bloodless Russian spring. The second goal is to force the Russian Federation to start a war with dill. The third is to provoke the Maidan in the Russian Federation under the pretext of a choice - the government gave to kill a patriot or the government started a war with the fraternal people. In the near future, in my opinion, Girkin-Six will be removed as Nemtsov and under the pretext of "bloody gebnya and Kremlin thieves killed a patriotic hero" they will try to start unrest in the Russian Federation. HOPE THE AUTHORITIES ARE READY FOR THIS OPTION.
    1. DobryAAH
      
      +1
      
      11 January 2016 23: 41
      
      I think it’s unlikely that such difficulties. Just a man is in the clouds. Perhaps, on the instructions of the party and the government, it creates the opposition, so that someone uncontrollable does not fit in.
engineer74

+2

11 January 2016 16: 37

The balance should be: -NW + air defense!
NEXUS

+4

11 January 2016 16: 41

The Saudis will be happy. Another thing is to sell the "Bastions" to Iran in order to block the Bab-al-Mandeb Strait.
1. DobryAAH
  
  0
  
  11 January 2016 21: 06
  
  Eats such a strait at the women, he himself checked, Mandeb.
2. Weyland
  
  +2
  
  11 January 2016 23: 28
  
  Quote: NEXUS
  Block the Bab el-Mandeb Strait
  
  May be. Still, Hormuz? To block Bab el-Mandeb - this will be atas! This is the same as blocking the Suez Canal! Yes, and he is far from Iran ...
  1. DobryAAH
    
    +1
    
    11 January 2016 23: 35
    
    A plus. We will leave this to the Yemenis.
    1. Weyland
      
      +1
      
      11 January 2016 23: 45
      
      Quote: Good AAAH
      This Yemenites leave
      
      A plus. Good thought ... (c)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. NEXUS
    
    +2
    
    12 January 2016 00: 48
    
    Quote: Weyland
    May be. Still, Hormuz? To block Bab el-Mandeb - this will be atas!
    
    No, it’s Bab el Mandeb . So that the Saudis did not seem to be honey.
    1. Weyland
      
      0
      
      12 January 2016 00: 58
      
      Quote: NEXUS
      So that Saudis do not seem to be honey
      
      Then better both ! But this is not enough - it will not hurt the Saudis to drive oil through the Suez Canal to Europe
      1. NEXUS
        
        +1
        
        12 January 2016 10: 02
        
        Quote: Weyland
        Then both are better! But this is not enough - it will not hurt the Saudis to drive oil through the Suez Canal to Europe
        
        China will finish building its own and then it will be "good" for the Saudis and mattresses.
    2. The comment was deleted.
3. The comment was deleted.
Koronik

+1

11 January 2016 16: 42

I think in today's situation Iran will need not only an air defense system, and most importantly not to lose an ally.
Yak-3P

+1

11 January 2016 16: 44

the theme is closer when going to the gym and buying guns come in handy ..
Bronik

+1

11 January 2016 16: 46

The United States shouts about the missile defense system in Europe that it is against Iran. Well, it’s logical to protect the Iranian sky with strong air defense systems. It’s not only economically advantageous for us ..
Gormenghast

+2

11 January 2016 16: 48

In Iran, there is actually nothing to comment on. Comments deserve an absolutely unreasonable refusal to fulfill a contract in 2008. Well, a lot of amers and I overworked after licking their heels?
Dwarfik

+1

11 January 2016 16: 49

Quote: Koronik
I think in today's situation Iran will need not only an air defense system, and most importantly not to lose an ally.

Here the loss of an ally is now much more critical for them. In any case, it was resolved and good!
Rom14

+1

11 January 2016 17: 00

Quote: Ami du peuple
Quote: A-Sim
A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling

What nafig partners? This is the current Prime Minister, as President of the Russian Federation, decided not to supply Iran with air defense systems, which, however, did not fall under any international sanctions.
In a good way, he should have hung all the costs associated with the Iranian contract. But, you see, everything was resolved to universal satisfaction.
So what if Medvedev D.A. partner for you - I sympathize with you. Can throw.
Strange is he some kind of Medvedev, is he not Romanian by chance ??
1. Thunderbolt
  
  +1
  
  11 January 2016 17: 10
  
  No. He is not Romanian. He is from the St. Petersburg team.
  1. gergi
    
    0
    
    11 January 2016 17: 17
    
    No, he's from a team of liberals, alas.
    1. DobryAAH
      
      -1
      
      11 January 2016 18: 09
      
      I don’t know about Medvedev’s liberalism, but under him the Georgians were well moved, although they were partners with the Americans. It is a fact.
      And then everyone caved in under them. Even if Putin was the prime minister.
      We will deduce the Liberals definitively when the West is cringing, before that they will be present and take care.
2. Weyland
  
  0
  
  11 January 2016 23: 53
  
  Quote: Rom14
  is he not romanian by chance ??
  
  Where can he ... One Romanian for timely betrayal Order of Victory received, not some miserable iPhone !
3. The comment was deleted.
Mavrikiy

+1

11 January 2016 17: 08

Yes allies will not go anywhere. Only enemies with us. That they sell it to deliver. Help, help, but by what. There is no time, read there is no production capacity of the military-industrial complex, orders for years have already been scheduled. And then Afghanistan begins to boil, here Central Asia gurgles, and even what else is needed.
1. gergi
  
  +2
  
  11 January 2016 17: 21
  
  Why did Iran not please you? They, by the way, we have weapons not under tady, but for cash they take. Above them, our calibers and planes fly. What other ally do you need?
4ekist

+1

11 January 2016 17: 11

Quote: vlad66
Quote: A-Sim
A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling

Well, the most important partner in these knots is now sitting in the place of the Prime Minister of Russia.

We never do anything just like that. Know the roles are distributed for years to come. And Iran must be armed to the teeth.
gergi

+1

11 January 2016 17: 15

Oh, sorry for the expression, this great one! (I’m not afraid of this word) Dmitry Anatoly, whose words are cast in granite! When will He leave us, the ungrateful? Dreams Dreams. Yeah.
Woodman

0

11 January 2016 17: 30

A gesture of goodwill from Iran. I believe that it is worth developing alliance relations with Iran.
Gunther

0

11 January 2016 17: 43

Quote: Saratoga833
This Medvedev has long been no longer in the Russian government, and not only in the government! On the bunks it is the place!

Together with those who took, in the opinion of  SRTs P-15, Putin’s solid word.
jovanni

+1

11 January 2016 17: 56

Quote: vlad66
Quote: A-Sim
A knot tied by "partners" is unraveling
Well, the most important partner in these knots is now sitting in the place of the Prime Minister of Russia.

And, it seems, there’s much more that I’m ready to weave ...
Fat

+2

11 January 2016 22: 39

Quote: Gormengast
In Iran, there is actually nothing to comment on. Comments deserve an absolutely unreasonable refusal to fulfill a contract in 2008. Well, a lot of amers and I overworked after licking their heels?

The conclusion of the contract - 2007. The five-day war - August 7-12, 2008. Resolution of the UN Security Council N 1929 - June 9, 2010. Licked at the heel (Putin was the Prime Minister, if you remember), after which almost 3,5 years of relative calm. During this period, sanctions against Iran ceased to be relevant. Then the accession of Crimea. Sanctions against the Russian Federation. The accession of the Russian Federation to the Anti-EGIL coalition. The leadership of Iran took everything adequately and went forward, they understand it because. I hope too...
Charik

0

12 January 2016 06: 06

Yes, and that there is Serdyuchka one hundred pounds to relatives iPhone