Military Review

The Emirates accused Tehran of "terror, occupation and sabotage"

60
Foreign ministers of the League of Arab States gathered for an emergency meeting in connection with the sharp deterioration in relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran, reports Look with reference to tass.




“We demand that Iran stop interfering in the affairs of Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, through terror, occupation and sabotage,” said Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Foreign Minister of the United Arab Emirates. “It is necessary to put an end to the Iranian intervention in the region, and we ask the Arab League to come out with a common position on this issue.”

In turn, the head of Saudi diplomacy, Al-Jubeir, stated that "Iran’s intervention is a blatant violation of all international conventions and norms."

According to him, "Saudi Arabia will oppose this intervention with all seriousness and determination, and calls on the League to take a clear position on Tehran’s actions."

“These attacks reflect the approach that Tehran practices in the Arab region, interfering in the affairs of our countries, stirring up inter-religious strife and undermining security and stability,” added Al-Jubeir.

The Arab League Secretary General al-Arabi also condemned Iran and laid on its government "full responsibility for the attacks on Saudi diplomatic missions."

“We do not accept Iran’s interference in the affairs of the region and its attempts to sow interfaith strife,” he said.

Only the representative of Lebanon abstained from condemning Tehran.

Recall the relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia deteriorated sharply after Riyadh announced the execution of a Shiite preacher al-Nimr.
Photos used:
news-front.info
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 11 January 2016 14: 51 New
    18
    Saudi Sixes received a command: Fas. Do Saudis have a war in the south and want to start with Iran? As you know: Bolivar can not stand two. It would be nice to remember this.
    1. Darkoff
      Darkoff 11 January 2016 14: 53 New
      +4
      Only the representative of Lebanon refrained from condemning Tehran

      the rest sold offal.
      1. venaya
        venaya 11 January 2016 15: 00 New
        +2
        “Iranian intervention is a flagrant violation of all international conventions and norms”

        These words and apply to Syria, where absolutely everyone who is not lazy intervenes in internal affairs (Russia does not count, acts strictly proceeding only from intergovernmental agreements and UN resolutions).
        1. Scraptor
          Scraptor 11 January 2016 15: 50 New
          -5
          But what is Syria, or it was not invited, but does it pay contributions to the OSCE?
          1. GDP
            GDP 11 January 2016 16: 02 New
            +1
            Syria's membership in the Arab League suspended ...
            In general, formally, LAS is a very strong association - about half a billion people. True, unanimity there is far from always achieved ... In fact, the Saudis and their singers rule there, although the headquarters are located in Egypt.

            In general, it is strange that relations with Iran among the Saudis escalated right now, when the United States is trying to make peace with them.
            Of course, there are reasons for this - Iranian oil, which confuses the cards to the Saudis in their little oil war, Iran’s support for Syria and the Husits, but why not earlier?
            1. Scraptor
              Scraptor 12 January 2016 02: 24 New
              +1
              Потому что "все идет по плану" (Со). Задолбало уже это гнусное королевство созданное чуть менее 100 лет назад Лоуренсом Аравийским.
      2. nazar_0753
        nazar_0753 11 January 2016 15: 11 New
        +2
        Ливан воздержался в том числе потому, что в итоговой резолюции осуждалась также и группировка "Хезболла"
      3. Denis Obukhov
        Denis Obukhov 11 January 2016 15: 13 New
        +3
        Сейчас это модно! Аналогия: п*рнуть в переполненном автобусе и возмущаться "Кто это сделал?!" Стиль США.
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 11 January 2016 14: 56 New
      11
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Saudi Sixes received a command: Fas.

      Those who were silent about interfering in the affairs of other countries were scarecrows with towels on their heads and sheets. Especially their interference is not felt in Yemen and Syria. Saudas, like the Middle Eastern USA, have no one to rest from them.
      1. Aleksander
        Aleksander 11 January 2016 16: 23 New
        0
        Quote: vlad66
        Especially their non-interference is felt in Yemen and Syria


        And in Bahrain, they sent troops there (and more than once) and dispersed Shiite demonstrations, killing more than a dozen people.
    3. Wiruz
      Wiruz 11 January 2016 14: 57 New
      +5
      Saudi Sixes received a command: Fas. Do Saudis have a war in the south and want to start with Iran? As you know: Bolivar can not stand two. It would be nice to remember this.

      If you believe Satanovsky, the war with Iran will result in a total defeat for the Arab monarchies. Until the loss of statehood. Personally, I see no reason not to believe the words of a smart Russian Jew bully
      1. Darkoff
        Darkoff 11 January 2016 15: 01 New
        -1
        Quote: Wiruz

        If you believe Satanovsky, the war with Iran will result in a total defeat for the Arab monarchies. Until the loss of statehood. Personally, I see no reason not to believe the words of a smart Russian Jew bully

        This, if you do not take into account NATO. And IT (neuter gender) is unlikely to stand aside.
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 11 January 2016 15: 03 New
          +6
          This is if you do not take into account NATO. And IT is unlikely to stand aside.

          When you were boiling in Ukraine, everyone started stuttering about NATO too, right up to sending US fur seals to the Donbass. Situations, of course, are largely common, but still. I personally do not think that Russia will remain on the sidelines, I mean the political support of Iran.
          1. Truth
            Truth 11 January 2016 15: 11 New
            +1
            Quote: Wiruz
            I personally do not think that Russia will remain aloof

            Пральна думаешь, "военторг" сработает оперативно, правда бензин с харчами опять подорожают, ну да хрен с ними с проблемами...
            I want to see how the wool from these American anusolises will fly.
            1. Wiruz
              Wiruz 11 January 2016 15: 14 New
              +4
              Пральна думаешь, "военторг" сработает оперативно, правда бензин с харчами опять подорожают, ну да хрен с ними с проблемами...

              Can you imagine how much a barrel of oil will cost when Arabia begins to burn? fool We are a scribe how profitable the war of Iran with the monarchies bully
              1. Truth
                Truth 11 January 2016 15: 41 New
                0
                Quote: Wiruz
                Can you imagine how much a barrel of oil will cost when Arabia begins to burn?

                Yes ... for sure.
                And lope in Russia will appear trillionaires (in ruble equivalent) ...
              2. Wheel
                Wheel 11 January 2016 16: 30 New
                +1
                Quote: Wiruz
                Can you imagine how much a barrel of oil will cost when Arabia begins to burn? We are a scribe how profitable the war of Iran with the monarchies

                Позвольте полюбопытствовать, кому "Нам"?
                Are you from the oil business?
                Then yes.
                Для простых же смертных максимум ремень на одну дырочку отпустить можно будет, и то, если "высочайше"дозволят.
        2. Ze Kot
          Ze Kot 12 January 2016 11: 54 New
          0
          Quote: DarkOFF
          Quote: Wiruz

          If you believe Satanovsky, the war with Iran will result in a total defeat for the Arab monarchies. Until the loss of statehood. Personally, I see no reason not to believe the words of a smart Russian Jew bully

          This, if you do not take into account NATO. And IT (neuter gender) is unlikely to stand aside.



          Is the CA now a member of NATO? They only have to protect themselves.
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 11 January 2016 15: 23 New
        0
        Doubtful.

        The Coalition of Saudi containment puppets has more chances for:

        Iranian Air Force is very bad, and right away on three key points
        1) The materiel is old and works on parole, the same F-14, F-4 and F-5 on artisanal service and cannibalism, with minimal resources. No better deal with the Su-22 and MiGs. Everything is bad with rockets.
        2) A low individual raid that goes from the point above, because the same Tomkets and Phantoms are pulling, the resource is extremely economically spent, as the result of 20 hours on a rooftop aircraft is a great success.
        3) Low combat stability, combat formations quickly crumble due to lack of reserves and the possibility of replenishment.

        The Saudis and Co. have a quantitative superiority, a qualitative superiority (for all 90 + aircraft, and 00 + in forcemeat), superiority in training, despite the general seam in army affairs, complete superiority in means of destruction (new AMRAAM, Sites of the latest modifications, guided missiles, bombs )

        In the fleet, Iran also has nothing to catch, only to use martyr boats and boats with 2 C-802 / 703 in dagger attacks on tankers.

        On missiles - Sadites have Chinese ballistic ones on 3,3k, plus smaller ones. That is, the Saudis will be able to strike at any large and well-covered air defense target, nuclear power plant, Tehran, oil industry. On the other hand, Iran will show itself well here.

        On the ground, if the Shiito-Sunite Mesilo begins, then through the south of Iraq with the participation of the same Iraqi Shiites, Iranian Shiites at the call of the spiritual leaders, in general, the Saudis and Co. will have big problems.
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 11 January 2016 15: 58 New
          +2
          Quote: donavi49
          The materiel is old and works on parole, the same F-14, F-4 and F-5 on artisanal service and cannibalism, with minimal resources. No better deal with the Su-22 and MiGs. Everything is bad with rockets

          Действительно с ВВС у Ирана очень плохо - они крайне "дряхлые" и плохо вооруженны. но зато довольно насыщенное ПВО.
          Quote: donavi49
          In the fleet, Iran also has nothing to catch, only to use martyr boats and boats with 2 C-802 / 703 in dagger attacks on tankers.

          This is an extremely controversial statement by Iran about 50 missile boats which in the conditions of a small Persian Gulf are quite effective means.
          By the way, RCAs of the Sina type and their grandfather Combatand, and boats delivered from China, almost all have four anti-ship missiles Nur or Gadir.

          There are corvettes, including those of their own construction with anti-ship missiles.
          Again, they already have up to twenty small submarines and three large ones.

          You should not discount mines and a large number of land-based anti-ship missiles of a shooting range over its entire width.

          Quote: donavi49
          On missiles - the Sadites have 3,3k Chinese ballistic, plus smaller ones.

          Well, in Iran’s missiles, the superiority is simply overwhelming and ALL military facilities of the SA will be hit, besides they produce them themselves, unlike the SA, whose stock is limited.
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 11 January 2016 17: 13 New
            +1
            It is necessary to proceed from reality, systematic strikes will be applied to the fleet bases. Large ships will be destroyed or disabled in the first weeks of the conflict. Since the air defense there is small-channel + normal coastal air defense is especially not enough (Rapiers and other Krotal do not especially beat JDAM and Harpoons - Low-channel standards and 1-2 beam systems on large ships, the Hawk will crush electronic warfare because the complex even in that generation is not very resistant to interference , and even more so today + it’s an American system - therefore, it can be effectively suppressed according to the manufacturer’s instructions).

            Small missile boats, boats and more will survive. Plus, the coastal component is very stable, since missile systems with C-802А (Exoset) and C-703 (short-range anti-ship missiles at 25km) are camouflaged for civilian awnings.

            Submarines - this is really Varshavyanka. Joint projects with North Koreans leave more questions, even at short range.

            On missiles, I wrote that the Saudis and KOs can cover any object, even well-covered air defense, such as nuclear power plants or Tehran. But in response they will fly very powerfully, no iron dome and the Patriots will not save. Especially given the very serious problems of intercepting even single Scuds and converted to Earth-Earth C-75.
            1. padded jacket
              padded jacket 11 January 2016 17: 41 New
              +2
              Quote: donavi49
              It is necessary to proceed from reality, systematic strikes will be applied to the fleet bases.

              Это скорее всё теория на практике СА с "кучей" союзников при полном господстве своей авиации до сих пор не может справится с хуситами. Тем более Иран не будет ждать удара и аэродромы и военные базы СА подвергнутся массированной атаке БР.
              Quote: donavi49
              Since air defense there is small-channel + normal coastal air defense is especially not enough

              Ну ПВО средней дальности там в основном представлена различными вариантами разработанными Ираном на базе ЗРК "ХОК\Усовершенствованный ХОК" ЗРК "Мерсад" есть и дальнобойные С-200 прошедшие модернизацию. АЭС "Бушер" охраняют "Тор-ы".
              Quote: donavi49
              Small missile boats, boats and more will survive.

              Perhaps so, but I think the SA will not have a better position with the fleet.
              Quote: donavi49
              S-802A (Exoset) and S-703 (short-range anti-ship missiles at 25 km) are camouflaged for civilian awnings.

              Там уже не совсем "Экзосеты" они похожи лишь внешне а дальность там уже под 200 километров. Опять же есть ПКР "Персидский залив" на базе ОТР с дальностью под 300 километров.
              Quote: donavi49
              Joint projects with North Koreans leave more questions, even at short range.

              Who knows? In the shallow water area, I think they will be effective, but this will only be known in practice.
              Quote: donavi49
              On missiles, I wrote that Saudis and KOs can cover any object, even well-covered air defense, such as nuclear power plants or Tehran

              I hope the CA does not have the intelligence to hit cities and nuclear power plants.
              But in any case, Iran has significantly more missiles and it can itself make up for their loss of SA, it will not be able to.

              By the way, in the photo you have RCAs of the Zolfaghar type (IPS 18) built in Iran exclusively for Syria in the Iranian Navy have never seen such RCAs. If there is a photo with them in Iran, discard it if not difficult.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Al_oriso
        Al_oriso 11 January 2016 15: 50 New
        0
        We believe Satanovsky. However, he will not voice the full alignment of forces, precisely because he is smart.
    4. Korney84
      Korney84 11 January 2016 15: 09 New
      +5
      2016 is the last year of the existence of Saudi Arabia !!!
    5. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 11 January 2016 15: 12 New
      +1
      The Sauddites executed 47 people and accuse Iran of meddling ... State Department level logic.
      1. meriem1
        meriem1 11 January 2016 15: 23 New
        0
        That's it!!! Pot calls the kettle black! Only not the UAE. Saudis and Bahrain. They need to roll the most tomatoes for the Chkchen Republic .... Jordan again! What? Who are They Holding Us For? Evg. Yanych Satanovsky said directly. Our plane in Egypt dropped Bahrain ... And a run to Us ... Like We? Everything will come back handsomely !!!
        1. Hello
          Hello 11 January 2016 15: 31 New
          0
          Quote: meriem1
          Evg. Yanych Satanovsky said directly. Our plane in Egypt dropped Bahrain ...

          Actually, he said Qatar, Bahrain cannot drop anything except its own dynasty yes
    6. Coconut Tima
      Coconut Tima 11 January 2016 15: 14 New
      0
      Saudi Arabia really wants Iran to not be lifted the sanctions and then Iranian oil will not go to the world market. Business, nothing personal!
    7. Great-grandfather of Zeus
      Great-grandfather of Zeus 11 January 2016 15: 16 New
      0
      oleg-gr-yes, no, the Saudis want to play their game, to repeat what is happening in Syria now and in Iran. for what they have created a coalition with a gang to stifle those unwanted. Here they want to show Iran, there must be only one master in the region. , excessive self-confidence didn’t bring anyone to good, and the Saudis were nastily taught history ...
    8. Asadullah
      Asadullah 11 January 2016 15: 47 New
      0
      Saudi Sixes got the team: Fas


      They try using Arabic methods to slow down the sale of Persian oil. They themselves pushed the cart with the prices off the cliff, now they don’t know who it will hit, or they themselves will break it. Americans were ideologists when they persuaded to push prices off a cliff. Now they only approve of the decisions of the camels, trying to stay away.
  2. shooter18
    shooter18 11 January 2016 14: 52 New
    +2
    Arab Emirates sponsor Ishilovites! last year there was news that the prince of Saudi Arabia was detained in a country with 100 kg of drugs !! here's the question who brought the prince of arabia 100 kg of drugs? more hypocrites they
  3. Wiruz
    Wiruz 11 January 2016 14: 52 New
    21
    Damn, forum users, what a bad habit to minus articles that are unpleasant to the eye? What does the author have to do with it? It’s not good for messengers to break off because of bad news.

    I have a proposal to the administration - remove the plus / minus bar under the news. Under opinions simply articles leave hi
    1. Dazdranagon
      Dazdranagon 11 January 2016 14: 55 New
      10
      Quote: Wiruz
      what a bad habit to minus articles unpleasant to the eye
      “It always touched me too!” Do not like it - go read Speed-Info! laughing
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 11 January 2016 14: 59 New
        +3
        Do not like it - go read Speed-Info!

        Is it necessary to read it? And I’m using her for her intended purpose. Well ... in the closet ... well, you understand. I also think why it is colorful laughing
    2. meriem1
      meriem1 11 January 2016 15: 27 New
      +1
      100% So !!! Even 100% of the information is minus! Admins do not look? How often and to whom? And then it happens strange. .... Someone does not comply with the rule ???
  4. LEVIAFAN
    LEVIAFAN 11 January 2016 14: 52 New
    0
    if oil rigs are set on fire, then someone needs it.
  5. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 11 January 2016 14: 54 New
    +1
    Doesn’t it remind you of anything? laughing
    1. Darkoff
      Darkoff 11 January 2016 14: 55 New
      0
      Quote: Observer 33
      Doesn’t it remind you of anything? laughing

      NATO + EU
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz 11 January 2016 15: 10 New
      +2
      Not what

      Господи! Ну почему я, троечник, знаю как правильно пишется "ничего"?!?! wassat
  6. Boos
    Boos 11 January 2016 14: 56 New
    0
    Are the Semites blaming? A joke, or what?)))
  7. Hello
    Hello 11 January 2016 14: 58 New
    -3
    Persians and Arabs stand each other, intervene wherever they fall, but are offended when they climb to them. I can only wish good luck to both parties, in deciding who is more important in the bay good
    1. Boos
      Boos 11 January 2016 15: 08 New
      +1
      I read that the Arabs almost reached Paris, the Ottomans to Vienna, tell me what side are the Persians here? Or are you about the time of Iskander the Two-Horned?)))
      Quote: Hello
      Persians and Arabs stand each other, intervene wherever they fall, but are offended when they climb to them. I can only wish good luck to both parties, in deciding who is more important in the bay good
      1. Hello
        Hello 11 January 2016 15: 15 New
        0
        Quote: Boos
        I read that the Arabs almost reached Paris, the Ottomans to Vienna, tell me what side are the Persians here? Or are you about the time of Iskander the Two-Horned?)))

        What are you talking about today, years of commercials from the 80s. Sworn enemies on the bay amicably cherish every bastard in the Middle East against each other. Why everyone suffers, including Arabs and Persians. Until recently, judging was better for judges, because there is more money and no sanction, but now they have parity. So they finally decided to find out who is cooler.
        1. Boos
          Boos 11 January 2016 15: 27 New
          0
          There would have been a general land ... But the Saudis do not pull out with the Yemeni partisans, and the Persians give them a blow!)
          1. Hello
            Hello 11 January 2016 15: 33 New
            0
            Quote: Boos
            There would have been a general land ... But the Saudis do not pull out with the Yemeni partisans, and the Persians give them a blow!)

            I strongly doubt that they will climb into direct conflict, continue to fight on trust. Just boost your proteges
          2. Yasen Ping
            Yasen Ping 11 January 2016 19: 46 New
            0
            What do you appeal to a friend with the Jewish flag, he has two truths, his own and not correct, and they do not study history ...
            1. Hello
              Hello 11 January 2016 19: 50 New
              0
              Quote: Clear Pin
              What do you appeal to a friend with the Jewish flag, he has two truths, his own and not correct, and they do not study history ...

              Before you write nasty things, it’s worth expressing your position, otherwise I didn’t read it, but I condemn it.
              Peace to you, a fighter with Zionism. Look under the bed. You will find many interesting things. wink
      2. Weyland
        Weyland 12 January 2016 00: 42 New
        0
        Quote: Boos
        what side are the Persians here? Or are you about the time of Iskander the Two-Horned?)))


        No, not Iskander, but a century and a half or two earlier - The Achaemenid Empire then included Bulgaria and Greece in the west, and Afghanistan and Pakistan in the east. Few people remember that the killing of King Ambassador Leonid (this is Sartaaa!) was a rebellion - a few years earlier Sparta agreed to become a vassal of Persia, but after the rebellion of Miletus, the Persians sent to large Greek embassy policies requiring confirm fidelity to vassal obligations ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
  8. Extraneous
    Extraneous 11 January 2016 14: 59 New
    +1
    Sluggish waving red rags. Americans will extinguish by all means this conflict, which threatens to drag them into the war, as allies. The Sauds are yapping precisely with the help of the states, since their forces against Iran are not enough. And the states are somehow not ready to fight directly with Iran.
  9. Wolverine
    Wolverine 11 January 2016 14: 59 New
    +1
    “These attacks reflect the approach that Tehran practices in the Arab region, interfering in the affairs of our countries, stirring up inter-religious strife and undermining security and stability,” added Al-Jubeir.

    Turn everything upside down and blame it on the US skate, so we know where the legs of these provocations against Iran, in general CATTES, grow from ...
  10. Koronik
    Koronik 11 January 2016 14: 59 New
    +5
    Everything will ever end, I think that we will be witnesses to the most important world changes in the near future.
    1. Manul
      Manul 12 January 2016 03: 06 New
      0
      Quote: Koronik

      Koronik Yesterday, 14:59 p.m.
      Everything will ever end, I think that we will be witnesses to the most important world changes in the near future.

      The saying is flattering. The picture is good. But rude. The character is Nordic. Not Russian. Viking, not Ross. I would like a more natural face for us.
  11. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 11 January 2016 15: 00 New
    +1
    Not, but what did they want by executing the Shiite preacher al-Nimr? That Iran will happily clap its hands? Let me remind you for a second - this country has lived and developed for a decade under severe sanctions and embargoes from the side of the mattress and its henchmen. An entire generation grew up there, highly motivated for survival and growth no matter what, but here such a mess from the side of the Saudis. And relations will deteriorate until the preacher’s killers come with an apology, there will be no other way. In the East, evil is a long memory.
  12. COBA
    COBA 11 January 2016 15: 06 New
    +3
    It may sound cynical and cruel, but the armed confrontation of Iran and Saud. Arabia is extremely beneficial to us, because leads to an increase in oil prices. Oil is not only an energy carrier, but one of the means to control humanity. The strange black substance from the bowels of the earth has nothing to do with dead dinosaurs and plants.
    1. Extraneous
      Extraneous 11 January 2016 15: 29 New
      +2
      Quote: COBA
      armed confrontation of Iran and Saud. Us extremely


      I think that Putin is unlikely to agree with you. The calculation of the Saudis is to support the Americans in this war. The Americans will not get involved in it because of fears that Russia may take the side of Iran, which will lead to a direct conflict of nuclear powers. Such a scenario does not suit anyone. Everything will continue as it goes - through a mediated war in Yemen and Syria. The Americans will spare no effort to keep the Saudis from a direct clash with Iran. If they climb, the Americans will back down. Type: sort it out yourself. And, most likely, initiate a shift in the royal house. I would not be surprised if it was the internal opposition in the royal family that provoked such a loud execution, with the expectation of removing the king in the wake of the escalation of the conflict.
  13. Alexey M
    Alexey M 11 January 2016 15: 08 New
    0
    If a gun hangs on the wall, then sooner or later it will fire. Two of the largest and richest oil countries in the region should have mated anyway. Earlier, though, Saddam was distracting himself now, so it's a matter of time, or how option to beat the third together.
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 11 January 2016 15: 13 New
      0
      Quote: Alexey M
      well, or as an option to beat the third together.


      Type of whom? it would be nice - amers to feel for the soft ... like for oil. Then you won’t have to beat if the two largest exporting powers unite on this issue. And they have much more in common than artificially heated differences.
  14. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 11 January 2016 15: 09 New
    0
    Yes, still, while in memory!
    In the attached photo on the presidium of the League of Arab States (!!!) a man with a movie camera was right on the right ... They didn’t let anyone in there, in any case, I had never met anyone like that. To do this, there are dome cameras mounted on the wall and broadcasting a picture of the other participants.
    А еще - четыре мужика - однояйцевые близнецы: у двоих руки на груди скрещены а-ля "капитан Немо", а двое в позе футболиста в стенке перед пенальти ))))

    Frames they are, in short. And all this meeting is complete nonsense. What can we say about internal content if they (the Saudis and K) are not familiar with the organization of the external side of events of this level.
  15. ovod84
    ovod84 11 January 2016 15: 10 New
    0
    Whoever screams more is to blame
  16. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 11 January 2016 15: 11 New
    0
    The monarchies of the Persian Gulf are the most vile and disgusting formations. If you dismantle them, the world will breathe freely.
  17. SklochPensioner
    SklochPensioner 11 January 2016 15: 16 New
    +1
    Quote: Hello
    I can only wish good luck to both parties, in deciding who is more important in the bay


    Quote: Alexey M
    Previously, at least Saddam was distracting himself now, so it's a matter of time, well, or as an option to beat the third together.


    ALLO, will you be the third? Joke! laughing
  18. vobels
    vobels 11 January 2016 15: 20 New
    +1
    So this third is from the league of the first. Both this league and this Abdella Nakheyan (a sonorous name) are clearly asking themselves to be overlaid and sent.
  19. russmensch
    russmensch 11 January 2016 15: 37 New
    0
    .... through terror, occupation and sabotage ...

    I don’t understand anything ... Has Iran already occupied Saudi Arabia? Or is it kakly suggested?
  20. gg.na
    gg.na 11 January 2016 15: 52 New
    0
    PANCAKE!!! Things are weirder and weirder belay occur! what
  21. Oleg7700
    Oleg7700 11 January 2016 15: 57 New
    +1
    Пакистан вчера впервые так откровенно озвучил свою позицию в суннито-шиитском противостоянии, заявив о своей немедленной силовой реакции на "агрессию" Ирана против саудов и заливников. СМИ даже указывают о фразе "уничтожим Иран" со стороны командования пакистанских воор. сил и отмечают резкое наращивание ядерного арсенала паков в последние годы... Некоторые аналитики полагают, что сауды уже "прикрутили" десяток пакистанских небольших(пару Хиросим...) яд. боеголовок к своим совместимым китайским носителям. В случае повторного сухопутного вторжения в Кувейт и СА из Ирака, он опять агрессор по всем пунктам и с теперешним Багдадом легитимно покончат...Войны не будет.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 11 January 2016 16: 14 New
      +1
      Quote: Oleg7700
      заявив о своей немедленной силовой реакции на "агрессию" Ирана против саудов и заливников. СМИ даже указывают о фразе "уничтожим Иран" со стороны командования пакистанских воор. сил и отмечают резкое наращивание ядерного арсенала паков в последние годы.

      А можно если не трудно какое либо подтверждение этих "грозных" заявлений официального Исламобада?
    2. KBR109
      KBR109 11 January 2016 16: 36 New
      +2
      India will not allow its sworn friend to be distracted very much - this is not to go to the grandmother ...
  22. Oleg7700
    Oleg7700 11 January 2016 16: 38 New
    +1
    I am not an advanced user, but clicked-pakistan saudi arabia news and there is a ton of information and look, everything multiplies.
  23. Lelek
    Lelek 11 January 2016 16: 47 New
    +2
    (Saudi Arabia will oppose this intervention with all seriousness and determination)

    Well, what will she (SA) do? Frowns, fangs of porcelain teeth or picks up sand in his mouth and spits in the direction of Iran? There is no opposition, erased in the war with the tiny Yemen. Cheek puffing and nothing more.
  24. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 11 January 2016 16: 54 New
    0
    From a sick head to a healthy one. The cause of America lives and conquers ...
  25. Manul
    Manul 11 January 2016 23: 59 New
    +1
    The eternally sacred question for VO is to minus the news, which we will certainly cause rejection, or plus, for information? And no one in my memory has exaggerated this question in full - everyone avoids it. I am for the fact that informative, in other words, news, publications should be fully welcomed, even if the news is from an enemy camp, and trolling (checking for lice, like all the fools in Russia) is deservedly sent to the furnace.
    Publications plus.