Warsaw Uprising 1944 of the Year: Causes of Defeat

21
Warsaw Uprising 1944 of the Year: Causes of Defeat


The Warsaw Uprising is an anti-fascist military uprising that took place in August-September 1944.

In July of this year, the troops of the Soviet Army crossed the Polish frontier and, under its pressure, German troops at the end of the month were forced to rush out of the city. But very soon the situation changed radically. Giler decided to keep the Polish capital at all costs. The German defense began to strengthen its position on the outskirts of the city, and the head of the Home Army, K. Iranek-Osmetsky, proposed to postpone the uprising, since it was doomed to failure. The commander of the Polish army Komorowski could not make a decision, but under pressure, he nevertheless agreed to start a performance.

According to the plan of the operation developed by the Soviet command, the city was supposed to be bypassed from the northern and southern sides in order to preserve it as the cultural Slavic capital and defeat the German grouping. All the details of the operation were repeatedly discussed by the command and it was assumed that it should not begin even on August 25 even under the most favorable circumstances.

In the Polish army at the beginning of the uprising, there were about 30 thousands of soldiers, which exceeded the number of German soldiers by half, but they were extremely badly armed. German troops used their advantage to localize the battles.

As part of the Soviet Army, there were not only separate units of the Polish Army, but also mixed partisan detachments, led by Soviet officers who turned out to be on enemy territory for some reason. All these detachments were staffed with people of different political views and aspirations, but the desire for all to drive the invaders out of their native land. The uprising rose 1 August. He was commanded by General Tadeusz Komorowski. The signal for his start was the bells of one of the churches. It should be noted that the fascist intelligence was unable to find out the details of the preparation and the date of the beginning of the uprising, therefore the German army was not ready for it.

The rebels managed to seize several German facilities and capture most of the city, but they failed to take control of any government building. The main transport routes and bridges over the Vistula were still in the hands of the Germans. Insufficient armament initially limited the ability of the rebels.

In the first days of the operation, Polish troops, consisting mainly of intellectuals, suffered significant losses - about 2 thousand people, while German units lost 4 times less than people. But the rebels managed to keep the initiative, since the German command had not yet managed to bring additional equipment and tools to Warsaw.

In addition, the Polish troops were left without air cover, as the sixteenth air army did not redeploy to the nearest airfields at the beginning of the uprising, and the troops of the First Belorussian Front were extremely exhausted by the battles with which 600 km went, leaving the carts and ammunition far behind.

The German command was well informed about all this, which decided to launch a counterattack on the bridgehead of the Soviet Army on the Vistula. They practically destroyed tank corps of the Second Army and managed to push part of the Belarusian Front from the Polish capital. German troops were in a better position because they used fortified positions in the city. During this fascist attack, Soviet troops lost 280 tanks and were forced to switch from attack to defense.

On the fourth day of the uprising, the German command began its suppression. Security forces of the SS, the Kaminsky brigade, Ukrainian nationalists and the police were thrown against the Polish troops. The fascist troops methodically destroyed the centers of the uprising.

On August 8, with the participation of Marshal G.Zhukov, a new plan was developed for the liberation of the Polish capital. It was assumed that the operation should be carried out by all forces of the front to reach Vyshgorod, Ciechanow, Sochaczew, Plonsk, Tomaszow, Skierniewice and, as a result, the occupation of Warsaw.

But the position of the Soviet-Polish troops was complicated by the strengthening of the German pressure on the south from the capital of the bridgehead. For their retention required additional forces. By this time, the uprising had acquired the features of a nationwide struggle against the invaders. However, after a few days, there was a shortage of ammunition. From September 13, Soviet aircraft began to drop mortars, anti-tank guns, machine guns, rifles, grenades, foodstuffs and medicines. Unlike American and British aircraft, which dropped ammunition from a great height and therefore such assistance was ineffective (most of these cargoes were captured by the Germans), Soviet aircraft operated at extremely low altitudes.

Despite such assistance, the situation of the rebels was complicated. September 14 Soviet Army troops approached the Vistula, but the Germans managed to destroy all the bridges. During this offensive, about 8,5 thousands of fascists died. Two days later, the First Army of the Polish Army began to force the Vistula. The infantry units were transported, but the equipment could not be transported because of the heavy fire of the German troops.

These failures, as well as enormous human casualties, lack of ammunition and food, forced Komorowski on October 2 on October 1944 to sign an act of surrender, resulting in almost the entire population of Warsaw being sent to forced labor in Germany.

As for the attitude of the Soviet leadership headed by Stalin towards the uprising, one thing is clear - it was quite ambivalent. On the one hand, Stalin declared his consent to assist the Polish troops, but on the other hand, the Soviet government rather sharply opposed the provision of Soviet airfields for landing allied aircraft. Stalin obviously did not want the Polish army to achieve its goals, because in this case, the Polish expelled government headed by Stanislav Mikolajczyk got a real chance for a post-war settlement of the state. And in the eyes of the Soviet leadership, the creation of an independent Poland instantly transferred it to the rank of political figures dangerous for the USSR. Many foreign historians call such an ambivalent attitude of the Soviet government as one of the reasons for the defeat, forgetting that the Western allies were able to do even less.

The Warsaw Uprising ended with the defeat of the Polish troops. In the course of it, about 10 of thousands of soldiers were killed, 150 of thousands of civilians, 17 of thousands were captured, and 7 of thousands were missing. Most of the city was in ruins, and what survived was systematically destroyed by special SS brigades. It was only during the Vistula-Oder operation carried out on 17 in January of 1945, that Warsaw was liberated.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. kotmster
    +8
    30 November 2011 09: 42
    From the point of view of achieving postwar domination and involving Poland in the communist camp, Stalin acted more than wise. And besides, why help the "allies" who may become enemies in the foreseeable future ...
  2. Den_tw
    +9
    30 November 2011 11: 03
    everything was confused - people, horses ... "at the end of the month the German troops were forced to hastily leave the city limits", then "the German defense began to strengthen its positions on the outskirts of the city" - so the Germans left or did not leave? "Commander of the Soviet Army, Komorowski ..." - what !? "In the Polish army by the beginning of the uprising, there were about 30 thousand soldiers" - the Polish army was defeated in 39g. and by 44g. it did not exist. "SS guard units, the" Kaminski brigade ", Ukrainian nationalists and the police were thrown against the Soviet troops." - So the rebels were Soviet troops ?? As far as I know, the Warsaw Uprising is an attempt by the West to establish its influence in Poland. The attempt is extremely unsuccessful. All responsibility for the failure lies with Churchill.
  3. J_silver
    +5
    30 November 2011 11: 10
    The quality of the material does not stand up to criticism! To the author - two, even with a minus ...
  4. +3
    30 November 2011 11: 45
    What are the Soviet troops ??? The Warsaw uprising was raised about the English forces, especially that there would be no reason to enter the Soviet army in Warsaw. not an article.
  5. dimarm74
    +11
    30 November 2011 13: 40
    Stalin did everything right ... in the interests of the USSR and not some ghoul of the Churchill .... Of course, Western historiography will interpret this in his own way ..... like all the Great Patriotic War and the Second World War .....
    According to their ugly logic, if the ruler of Russia acts in the interests of Russia and not the West, .. then naturally a bastard, a scoundrel, a tyrant and a bloodsucker ..... and Gorbachev and Yeltsin are good .....
  6. patriot464
    +2
    30 November 2011 15: 30
    The article is correct, but awkward to the point of impossibility. We read books.
  7. +5
    30 November 2011 18: 11
    England’s attempt once again to block the heat with the wrong hands and unsuccessfully, but it’s a pity for people, but alas.
    1. ballian
      -2
      30 November 2011 21: 01
      What are you talking about? There it was a question of the legitimate government of Poland, to which the rebel Polish rebels obeyed.
      1. Lech e-mine
        +1
        2 December 2011 15: 39
        Well, to hell with us, our soldiers had to be ruined for the interests of this legitimate government?
  8. Insurgent
    -3
    30 November 2011 20: 52
    In my opinion, the author confuses something, there was an uprising of the Warsaw ghetto, and here they don’t take part in it
    1. Superduck
      +2
      30 November 2011 22: 59
      You confuse this, the uprising in the Jewish ghetto was much as before and completely crushed back in May 43.
    2. 0
      10 December 2011 03: 37
      The guys from the "Electro Campaign" sorted it out very quickly with that uprising. No. and it was in the region of 42 years and from the front line for a kilometer-nat and the grebes were muddied by the Poles themselves the living quarters freed up even a few trunks tossed well, supposedly like firewood into casters.
  9. +7
    30 November 2011 22: 16
    the pshekhs always had more ambition than common sense and paid for it. And the red army in front of Warsaw became for a banal reason in the units was 15-25% of the staff at the beginning of Operation Bagration. They tried to force the Vistula, holed up to the shore, organized a bridgehead, and the Germans had no strength to hold onto the fresh fire brigades from the western front.
    1. Superduck
      0
      30 November 2011 23: 03
      Well, in any case, they did not appreciate the help of the Red Army, or rather did not appreciate its almost complete absence. When they decided to drop their weapons, they did not equip the boxes with parachutes, because almost everything crashed, and almost no ammunition was given. The Poles expected that they would lose the captured German. In short, they all looked like a mockery.
      1. +2
        2 December 2011 13: 16
        Was Poland a strategic partner of the USSR until the outbreak of World War II? What kind of attitude did the Poles want towards themselves, acting under the auspices of the émigré government, which sat in London throughout the war. In addition, the so-called "loyalty" Army Home to the Red Army fully manifested itself in the spring and summer of 1944 and was expressed in sabotage and subversive activities in the rear of the Soviet troops in the former "Polish" territories.
        Poles will never be even neutral towards Russia - for these kulak singers and beggars, the mask of a "martyr" will always be convenient.
        1. 0
          8 February 2012 20: 43
          Before the start of World War II, Poland in the plans of the war (plans for the use of armed forces) of almost all European countries bordering it was considered as a likely adversary, moreover, an aggressor, due to the ambitious policy of the Poles.
      2. Lech e-mine
        +1
        2 December 2011 15: 41
        AHA will also dump honey and fat. In short, the Russians should do everything for the Poles, and then the Poles, under the curtain of a kick to the liberators.
  10. +6
    1 December 2011 04: 32
    Many foreign historians call this ambivalence of the Soviet government one of the reasons for the defeat, forgetting that the Western allies were able to do even less.

    and if they hadn’t gone so independent and independent, they strive for someone else’s ... to enter paradise and scream at the same time that everything is done
    How many of our soldiers were killed there?
  11. Capture
    +5
    1 December 2011 12: 23
    The farther, the more brazenly and shamelessly they will extort the leading role of the Soviet Union in the Victory in World War II !!!
    1. Lech e-mine
      +3
      2 December 2011 15: 42
      So these falsifiers must be firmly put in place.
  12. Odesit
    0
    23 December 2011 19: 33
    The Poles, as always, showed their guts. Komarovsky, Sikorsky and other gang did not care about losses. Just not to let the Russians in Warsaw. If only to have time to report to the Anglo-Saxons about the new Great Rzeczpospolita. After all, there was an opportunity to coordinate the timing of the uprising with our offensive. They didn’t want to. one word - gentry.
  13. 0
    8 February 2012 20: 39
    Friends, read the memoirs of K. K. Rokossovsky! The author of the article seemed to be picking up slops from the Internet, with which the Anglo-Saxons watered us fool
  14. 0
    26 July 2016 14: 06
    This unprepared uprising, doomed in advance to failure, which began a priori to prevent the liberation of Warsaw by the Soviet Army, collapsed. In fact, it was a speech against the Soviet Army. In the end, they wanted it and got it. Let now be proud of this shameful spot in the history of Poland.