Military Review

President of South Ossetia proposes to rename the republic

46
The President of South Ossetia, Leonid Tibilov, during a press conference, voiced his proposal to rename the republic. According to the head of state, the word “Alania” should be added to the title. In this case, the Caucasian state will be called the Republic of South Ossetia-Alania. It is reported by the news agency TASS.


The head of South Ossetia noted that this will emphasize historical the unity of the Ossetian people, which is now actually divided by borders. Leonid Tibilov added that the people are striving to realize their age-old dream of unity.

President of South Ossetia proposes to rename the republic


Leonid Tibilov:
I am ready to give appropriate instructions and work out the mechanism for renaming our republic into the Republic of South Ossetia-Alania. There are divided people and two parts of Ossetia - the Republic of South Ossetia and the Republic of North Ossetia - Alania, we strive to ensure that our people become one. This is the age-old dream of all our people.


Tbilisi has already managed to comment on this statement by the head of the RSO. A number of Georgian politicians believe that this may be "the first step towards the republic's entry into Russia, which is a matter of obvious concern." Regarding concerns about the realities of Tbilisi’s politicians, it would still be better to turn to Mr. Saakashvili, whose adventure was the main reason for South Ossetia to finally sever all its relations with its southern neighbor.
Photos used:
http://presidentruo.org
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech
    Same lech 29 December 2015 07: 14 New
    23
    President of South Ossetia proposes to rename the republic


    The Ossetians themselves must decide this ... the fate of SOUTH OSSETIA is in their hands ... we only need to help them maintain their identity.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 29 December 2015 07: 16 New
      11
      Quote: The same Lech
      Ossetians themselves must decide this

      Well, Tibilov, it seems, is not a Turkmen. what
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 29 December 2015 07: 19 New
        +7
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Well, Tibilov, it seems, is not a Turkmen.

        Then let it be so, the inhabitants of Ossetia themselves must decide.
      2. kodxnumx
        kodxnumx 29 December 2015 18: 58 New
        0
        Yes, in fact, it is high time to accept South Ossetia as part of Russia. To finally unite a single people!
    2. Juborg
      Juborg 29 December 2015 07: 24 New
      0
      The question immediately arises, but at whose expense is the banquet? Such enterprises are very expensive in fact.
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 29 December 2015 07: 28 New
        11
        For ours, for whose else !!!
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 29 December 2015 08: 15 New
          +7
          Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
          For ours, for whose else !!!


          Yes. Collecting stones is worth a lot, but you need to do this, otherwise history will not forgive us.
          (cry.)
        2. evge-malyshev
          evge-malyshev 29 December 2015 12: 06 New
          +3
          Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
          For ours, for whose else !!!


          The main thing is not to begin to measure who is more important. Do you want to unite? Say goodbye to your sovereignty. And so, with God.

          PS I think that for us 50 thousand people (population
          South Ossetia) will not become a big burden. AND
          the unification of the two Ossetia will have a large
          moral and political significance for both
          republics
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 29 December 2015 07: 51 New
        +6
        Quote: juborg
        The question immediately arises, but at whose expense is the banquet?

        And at whose expense are Abkhazia and Ossetia now living? At whose expense does Donbass survive ???
        1. 34 region
          34 region 29 December 2015 09: 05 New
          -14
          Well then, you can ask a question, and at whose expense Russia survives? Almost no production. All products are imported. So we are sitting on the neck of China and the West? After all, go to any store, import everywhere. Foreign cars. We store money in Western banks. Plastic cards imported. So at whose expense does Russia live?
          1. 72jora72
            72jora72 29 December 2015 09: 37 New
            13
            After all, go to any store, import everywhere. Foreign cars. We keep money in Western banks. So at whose expense does Russia live?
            Well, it’s just not necessary to exaggerate, and in stores up to 50% of the domestic manufacturer, and cars on the roads (60%) are also domestic, and we store money in the Security Council ......
            PS And Russia lives at the expense of us, dear, for Russia is what we are, only in this way and in no other way.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. lis-ik
              lis-ik 29 December 2015 14: 09 New
              0
              In stores, more than 80 percent of the domestic, I mean grocery, and then made a discount that almost all beer companies with foreign capital, almost all of us, anyway.
          2. 0255
            0255 29 December 2015 10: 47 New
            +1
            Quote: 34 region
            Well then, you can ask a question, and at whose expense Russia survives? Almost no production. All products are imported. So we are sitting on the neck of China and the West? After all, go to any store, import everywhere. Foreign cars. We store money in Western banks. Plastic cards imported. So at whose expense does Russia live?

            Buy a Yotafon phone, a Rolsen TV, a Biryusa refrigerator, drive to Lada Priore, wear Russian clothes, who is stopping you from supporting the Russian manufacturer with the ruble? And the technology of many leading world brands is also going to your place in the Russian Federation.
            1. 34 region
              34 region 29 December 2015 12: 02 New
              -3
              And when will Russian brands be assembled there? The inscription-made in ..., appeared after one of the exhibitions, where German goods were of the lowest quality. After that, they obliged to designate the country of manufacture. And when will our products fill up overseas markets?
      3. 34 region
        34 region 29 December 2015 09: 00 New
        +5
        Any activity requires money. And why are you against it? Or is there an opinion that it is necessary to split up even further? For some reason, joining NATO, the WTO, the UN, the EU, the question of the price of the issue does not come up. When someone abroad is trying to separate from the collective farm, the company begins (from above) against separation. Let them connect. Maybe we will soon accept India as part of Russia. At her insistent request. winked Maybe Alaska wants to separate from the United States and join us. How are we all already used to the fact that everyone separates from us and leaves. Either the countries of the socialist camp are gone, then the territories. Maybe it's time to finish the division and engage in growth?
    3. tol100v
      tol100v 29 December 2015 08: 15 New
      +3
      Quote: The same Lech
      Ossetians themselves must solve this ..

      Yes, and Abkhazians can think about the autonomous republic of Abkhazia as part of the Krasnodar Territory!
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 29 December 2015 08: 25 New
        +6
        Why do we need another autonomy? We need to think about how to turn other republics into governor generals. And then, some are on their own friends with the Turks, others are still with someone else. Volnitsa will not bring to good. Yes, national culture needs to be developed, schools with language teaching should be opened, but, let's say, all this education should, simply, be called Krasnodar Territory.
        1. Naum
          Naum 29 December 2015 08: 37 New
          +7
          100%! Republics have the right to be called financially independent territorial entities from the federal budget. And then after the referendum! For me it would be better to return to the provinces. Autonomy should be only cultural, but not economic.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Sergej1972
              Sergej1972 29 December 2015 11: 24 New
              +1
              I think this is a joke. But if seriously, always when joining these or those territories, you need to understand that these are people with their own mentality, traditions, and their electoral behavior. And often the accession of certain territories can change the balance of power on the political scene of the country, can make changes in political traditions, in the political system.
              1. 34 region
                34 region 29 December 2015 12: 40 New
                0
                Are you afraid Israel will crush Russia economically? Regarding the alignment of political forces. We have organizations with different electoral behavior. These are NATO, EU, WTO, UN. And how much do the countries in these organizations change their political alignment? But this alignment greatly affects these countries. You could even say that one country of three letters strongly influences these countries. And what's interesting. This country, like a vacuum cleaner or a black hole, constantly encroaches on other countries and tries to attach them. Let not territorially, but through the organization. And the law of organization is higher than the law of the country. Is this not a takeover?
      2. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 29 December 2015 11: 21 New
        0
        The republic cannot constitutionally enter the province.
    4. Naum
      Naum 29 December 2015 08: 32 New
      +3
      This is quite a costly affair. And premature. There are other tasks for the development of South Ossetia, more priority and urgent. Not the name of the matter.
  2. avvg
    avvg 29 December 2015 07: 16 New
    +8
    Everything is logical and you can’t argue, there is North Ossetia-Alanma and there will be South Ossetia-Alania. The people will be only For!
  3. avva2012
    avva2012 29 December 2015 07: 17 New
    +6
    Tbilisi has already commented on this statement by the head of South Ossetia. A number of Georgian politicians believe that this could be "the first step on the path of the republic becoming part of Russia, which causes clear concern."

    And so, the republic is not a member. Georgians, nevertheless, have not gone far from Ukraine. Dreamers.
    1. demo
      demo 29 December 2015 07: 52 New
      +1
      If Saakashvili is working in Ukraine, then the level of development of Georgians is the same as that of Ukrainians.
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 29 December 2015 08: 21 New
        +3
        Quote: demo
        If Saakashvili is working in Ukraine, then the level of development of Georgians is the same as that of Ukrainians.


        If the coolest tie-eater already allows himself to yell at UKRPS ministers, then the hedgehog understands that the level of the latter is even lower than the American footman (by profession a Georgian).
  4. venaya
    venaya 29 December 2015 07: 17 New
    +1
    Concern about renaming the republic alone is already provoking such a reaction. And what will happen if we still dare to rename Georgia to Grussia ???
    1. inkass_98
      inkass_98 29 December 2015 07: 24 New
      +5
      And why rename it, and so Georgia only in Russian. The self-name of Sakartvelo, in the English language of Goeorgia, tek sht even call a pot, nothing will change from this. It's not a name, but a self-identification.
      1. venaya
        venaya 29 December 2015 07: 56 New
        +3
        Quote: inkass_98
        It's not a name, but a self-identification.

        If only. Recently, the Japanese were banned from using the term Georgia and forced to use the term Goeorgia. And what, it makes no sense?
        That Porussia will be called Prussia, the Baltic states and even France. And doesn’t that matter either? And how many more such renaming is that the African term "Europe" is not enough for us. Actually, the article is partially devoted to this problem. I don’t think this question is so important - "As you call a ship, it will sail"!
  5. 24rus
    24rus 29 December 2015 07: 31 New
    +1
    May connect and be called Ossetia-Alania
  6. avva2012
    avva2012 29 December 2015 07: 34 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Well, Tibilov, it seems, is not a Turkmen.

    Then let it be so, the inhabitants of Ossetia themselves must decide.

    As I understand it, they have long decided.
  7. Sergey Vladimirovich
    Sergey Vladimirovich 29 December 2015 07: 41 New
    -5
    I am ready to give relevant instructions and work out a mechanism for renaming our republic into the Republic of South Ossetia-Alania.

    All is well, of course, Alania, so Alania ... the joy of the people of Ossetia and the dough will again be washed away (in the part concerning) by renaming.
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 December 2015 07: 44 New
    +2
    It also seems to me that Ossetians themselves must resolve this issue, including the financial costs of this event.
  9. garnik64
    garnik64 29 December 2015 07: 45 New
    +9
    I respect Ossetians, in general it’s time for them to unite. The only people in the North Caucasus who genuinely support Russia.
  10. APASUS
    APASUS 29 December 2015 08: 04 New
    0
    I do not understand this historical justice. Here is the referendum on the unification of a divided people - I understand that, will they be called Alans or not, what does this change in the life of the two republics ???
  11. const72
    const72 29 December 2015 08: 12 New
    +2
    definitely add to the Russian Federation, not for that our boys died there
  12. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 29 December 2015 08: 35 New
    0
    If the new name reflects the unity of the peoples living on the territory of both republics, reflects ethnic unity, has historical traditions underneath, then why not.
  13. David 2633
    David 2633 29 December 2015 08: 42 New
    -3
    of all the money allocated by Russia, part goes back in the form of kickbacks to Moscow, the majority is plundered and only the crumbs are supposedly recovering, now the situation has improved Russia has appointed a company from Tatarstan as the main general contractor of the republic, but again, almost all the local respectable companies that have proved themselves to be the best nothing, hence the conclusion that all the money that Russia allocates is all returned to Russia. if you look at the prospect of the republic for development, it is simply necessary to build relations with Georgia, namely, open the borders for the movement of goods, food, building materials and try to develop agriculture. Say what you like at the moment, the republic in its current form as it is now is a dead end, and it is impossible to forever be dependent only on Russia.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 29 December 2015 09: 14 New
      +2
      Ossetia is dependent on Russia! Want independent Ossetia? Are Benelux countries also independent of the EU, or are they included in it?
    2. lukewarm
      lukewarm 29 December 2015 09: 49 New
      0
      A small country is rarely self-sufficient. Essno, there can be no complete independence. The only question is who it depends on. You suggest that from Georgia, as from Russia - is it really bad? So? With the departure of Baton Mishiko, did Georgia become better with us? Stop climbing into NATO? Suggest answers? And what do the Ossetians themselves think about friendship with Georgia? How will they react to your advice? In the meantime, minus.
  14. Chulman
    Chulman 29 December 2015 08: 52 New
    -5
    Quote: avva2012
    Why do we need another autonomy? We need to think about how to turn other republics into governor generals. And then, some are on their own friends with the Turks, others are still with someone else. Volnitsa will not bring to good. Yes, national culture needs to be developed, schools with language teaching should be opened, but, let's say, all this education should, simply, be called Krasnodar Territory.

    Nooooo, don't! Adygs are enough for us in the middle of the region! Why do we also need Ossetians ?! You can identify them closer to Birobidzhan .... well .... if they agree! lol
    1. Atlas
      Atlas 29 December 2015 09: 04 New
      +1
      This is a joke???
      Quote: Chulman
      Quote: avva2012
      Why do we need another autonomy? We need to think about how to turn other republics into governor generals. And then, some are on their own friends with the Turks, others are still with someone else. Volnitsa will not bring to good. Yes, national culture needs to be developed, schools with language teaching should be opened, but, let's say, all this education should, simply, be called Krasnodar Territory.

      Nooooo, don't! Adygs are enough for us in the middle of the region! Why do we also need Ossetians ?! You can identify them closer to Birobidzhan .... well .... if they agree! lol

      And who are you anyway ????? To reason like this one must be a complete nerd ..
  15. David 2633
    David 2633 29 December 2015 09: 03 New
    +2
    Quote: Chulman
    Quote: avva2012
    Why do we need another autonomy? We need to think about how to turn other republics into governor generals. And then, some are on their own friends with the Turks, others are still with someone else. Volnitsa will not bring to good. Yes, national culture needs to be developed, schools with language teaching should be opened, but, let's say, all this education should, simply, be called Krasnodar Territory.

    Nooooo, don't! Adygs are enough for us in the middle of the region! Why do we also need Ossetians ?! You can identify them closer to Birobidzhan .... well .... if they agree! lol

    Ossetians will remain to live where they lived for centuries, and the neighbors will stay there and need to build normal relations with them, I don’t know why our tanks stopped in 2008 from 40 km to Tbilisi, if you look now we would have normal relations with a neighbor
    1. lukewarm
      lukewarm 29 December 2015 10: 14 New
      +3
      Emotionally share your point of view. I would like to finish it off. Deficiencies of the nobleman are never appreciated. All that remains is an undercurrent of resentment and a desire for revenge. Why did you stop? HZ. In my opinion, the versions are as follows.
      1. The president of DAM as he chewed the substance at the beginning chewed it to the end. The war was stopped by the cry of the "civilized world." Still hoping for reciprocity, naive.
      2. Stopped consciously. To get involved in street battles was probably not included in the plans, but plans for a possible war turned out to be. were.
  16. vol46an
    vol46an 29 December 2015 09: 05 New
    +4
    The entry of South Ossetia and Abkhazia into the Russian Federation is a pending decision. It will take place if Georgia joins NATO. With this act, Georgia rejects territorial claims and the process begins to move.
  17. Old Siberian
    Old Siberian 29 December 2015 09: 09 New
    +3
    I support in antiquity the Alans were friends of the Rus. We are Scythians with them.
  18. David 2633
    David 2633 29 December 2015 09: 19 New
    0
    Quote: vol46an
    The entry of South Ossetia and Abkhazia into the Russian Federation is a pending decision. It will take place if Georgia joins NATO. With this act, Georgia rejects territorial claims and the process begins to move.

    It might be better to work proactively rather than act in connection with the current situation, for some reason our entire foreign policy consists precisely of whether the events in Ukraine in Transnistria and others. Do you understand that joining South Ossetia and Abkhazia to the Russian Federation can forever ruin relations with Georgia? in my opinion this is a big mistake for our peoples.
  19. David 2633
    David 2633 29 December 2015 09: 20 New
    0
    Moreover, Abkhazia does not at all strive to become part of the Russian Federation.
  20. polite people
    polite people 29 December 2015 11: 30 New
    0
    Yes, it’s time to unite the two republics into one - the northern and southern ones.
  21. prishelec
    prishelec 29 December 2015 13: 48 New
    0
    In the Caucasus, all and sundry become Alans except the Alans themselves)) among the Ossetians there is only a small part of the Alans - this is an insignificant part of the Ardon Ossetians. The bulk of the Ossetians are the same Alans - like I am a Martian!)) The current "Alans" have nothing to do with historical Alans.
    1. Tim_2
      Tim_2 30 December 2019 10: 03 New
      0
      laughing and excuse everyone the difference between Ardon and Alagir or Beslan, didn’t you think of anything smarter?