OTRK Iskander-M will receive a new missile

Valery Kashin, General Designer of NPK Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering, told the media that the company had created a new ammunition for the Iskander-M operational tactical complex. We are talking about a new aeroballistic rocket, which has already passed interdepartmental tests.

Information Agency TASS Citing Valery Kashin, reports that the Iskander-M OTRK can now be equipped with five types of aeroballist missiles, as well as one cruise missile.

According to Valery Kashin, the work on the modernization of the operational-tactical complex, which is in service with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, does not stop, which makes it possible to create new missiles for the Iskander using advanced technologies.

This year, rocket personnel from various military districts took part in exercises using the operational-tactical missile complex Iskander-M. Thus, during the maneuvers in the Astrakhan region, the combat calculations of the Iskander-M OTRK sent a series of strikes against the infrastructure of the conditional enemy located at a distance of 300 km. The defeat of the goals was successful.

Comments

[oleg-gr]

Good news. You can't disappoint your "partners". They should not relax in NATO. Let Tonus be consumed.

[MIKHALYCH1]

"Iskander" has not yet been tested in real life .. Our constructors work surprisingly constructively! The main thing is that the military-industrial complex does not let you down ..

[Denis Obukhov]

It is necessary to experience in Syria. There, 500 km is enough to cover all the objects of ISIS.

[doework]

Is it expensive, Iskander beard mock

[oldseaman1957]

Quote: doework

Is it expensive, Iskander beard mock

- So this will not be a waste, but TEST. Refinement during application.

[Vorobey-1]

"Iskander" and so have no analogues, and then there's +!
Well done! Just joy in the heart!

[Falcon]

Quote: Vorobey-1

"Iskander" and so have no analogues, and then there's +!

Oh, well, let's just not talk about having no tax in the world.

Of course he is good, but he has a direct analogue.

ATACMS

[Inok10]

Quote: Falcon

Oh, well, let's just not talk about having no tax in the world.

Of course he is good, but he has a direct analogue.

ATACMS

.. what you brought into comparison can only be an analogue of "Tochka" - "Tochka-U", no more, an ordinary ballistic short-medium-range missile, depending on the modification .. to "Iskander" with its quasi-ballistic trajectory and a speed of 2100 m / s .. mattress product, as to China in a known position from Kaliningrad ..

[Vorobey-1]

Quote: Inok10

Quote: Falcon

Oh, well, let's just not talk about having no tax in the world.

Of course he is good, but he has a direct analogue.

ATACMS

.. what you brought into comparison can only be an analogue of "Tochka" - "Tochka-U", no more, an ordinary ballistic short-medium-range missile, depending on the modification .. to "Iskander" with its quasi-ballistic trajectory and a speed of 2100 m / s .. mattress product, as to China in a known position from Kaliningrad ..

This is for sure, far from being an analogue of the Iskander, the Tochka may be that ...
In general, the images of this ATACMS are pinned up - a 6-pipe block and next to it there is such a puss with caliber as the whole block, couple I don’t understand the joke with scale ?!
maybe so ..

[NordUral]

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-140_ATACMS

And they did not make an approximate approximation to ours.

[rero]

LORA - izraelskaia sistema 'toze mozet strliat raketami raznovo tipa i krilatoi raketi

[Lex.]

For such cases, the rzso polonaise would be suitable, it is an order of magnitude cheaper and the accuracy is 1,5 meters

[opus]

Quote: Falcon

but he has a direct analogue.

well, "not direct"
Maximum firing range 300 km

950x M74 Unguided Anti-Personnel / Anti-Material (APAM) Submunition with a range of 128 km (80 miles)
The 275x M74 submunition (ANN / GPS) has 165 kilometers (103 miles) range
MGM-140C / MGM-164A ATACMS Block 2: Equipped with a warhead cassette with 13 homing BAT ("BET") combat elements. Firing range up to 140 km. Not fully accepted
unitary (MGM-140E), replaces 230 kg (500 pounds) unitary HE warhead M74 bombs. GPS / INS as well as MGM-140V. The range has been increased to 300 km (190 miles).

The fact that the plump in the photo is the same for the HIMARS TR ATACMS 560 kg (950xM47)

300km is the same, at maximum.

 Show / Hide text

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed/data/mfc/pc/atacms-block-1a-u

nitary / mfc-atacms-block-1a-unitary-pc.pdf

UK has the same

This option is even more interesting for them.

MTCR is clearly impaired.
Base Nike-Hercules:

[Lex.]

Well, this is an analogue, rather, point y

[Bersaglieri]

In terms of parameters, it's still not an analogue, but in between "Tochka-U" and "Iskander"

[aksakal]

Quote: oldseaman1957

Refinement during application.

- in real combat conditions and in real combat use! Of course, in real life against the bearded ISIS firing Iskanders is about the same as shooting at sparrows from a cannon. In real life, if Russia had enough attack UAVs, it would be optimal to wet them with the help of them, well, use bombers for difficult targets, this is all clear, and everyone understands this. But Russia has not seriously fought for a long time, and God forbid, there will be no need to fight, and therefore it is impossible to check new developments in combat use. And therefore, it was not superfluous to check Iskander in Syria. By the way, the "second hare" in all this is a demonstration to the Zaluga partners that the weapons used in Syria are formidable, not in words or in advertising brochures, but formidable in real life, because partners treat advertising brochures with distrust. "The third hare" - buyers see the product with their face that their seller-producer does not cheat, but sells a worthwhile thing that is worth the money this seller asks for them. So I would support several Iskander launches in Syria. "Point U" in Yemen has shown itself, but alas, about half of the missiles are flying in the wrong direction - the Yemenis complain. If the "Points" were more reliable, the Saudis would have no time for Syria at all.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: aksakal

approximately half of the missiles are flying in the wrong direction - Yemenis complain.

You need to aim better, enter meteorological data last, not last week! Then you don’t have to complain!
These are only our ICBM launch errors and the target location after astrocorrection is selected, plus GLONASS shamanite ... And here - yourself, be so kind, calculate the firing data ... enter the corrections ... Then press the "start" button
In short, Do not blame the mirror, if the mug is crooked!

[Lukich]

Quote: doework

Is it expensive, Iskander beard mock

Yes, and drag away.

[Bochik]

Quote: Lukich

Quote: doework

Is it expensive, Iskander beard mock

Yes, and drag away.

To drag to the nearest airfield far?

[Lukich]

Quote: Bochik

To drag to the nearest airfield far?

to destination. what's the point? What is there that is not at our landfills?

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Lukich

to destination. what's the point? What is there that is not at our landfills?

At our test sites there are no (glory to the Almighty!) Bearded ISIS burying themselves underground!

[Lex.]

Is it expensive, Iskander to be ridiculed by beards-A calibers?

[Lex.]

Is it expensive, Iskander to be ridiculed by beards-A calibers?

[zulusuluz]

Iskander in Europe already know, have heard ... But Caliber good advertising has benefited! So much so that the Americans fell into a stupor for several days in the international arena.

[abrakadabre]

But still there are goals for them: oil refineries, bulk terminals, which are used by Turkey through barmaley.

[kil 31]

What does the range have to do with it, it's about warheads.

Valery Kashin, general designer of NPK Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering, told the media that the company has created a new ammunition for the Iskander-M tactical and operational complex.

What is the warhead in this article? But it is not said which? I think a stupid article.

[cniza]

New missiles and new opportunities, there is no limit to perfection.

[kil 31]

Quote: cniza

New missiles and new opportunities, there is no limit to perfection.

Where is it written about a new rocket? It is written about the new warhead.

Valery Kashin, general designer of NPK Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering, told the media that the company has created a new ammunition for the Iskander-M tactical and operational complex.

[Bochik]

Where is the least mention of warhead in the article? Would you even look at Wikipedia or something ... What does the warhead have to do with it? In the article, ammunition means a new missile, which does not contradict terminology at all. And what warhead is needed, this one will be set based on the needs of the current moment.

[kil 31]

Ammunition means a new missile. Yes, I agree, terminology is an interesting thing. As I wrote below, the bullet is different, but the cartridge is the same. Where the article says that they came up with a new rocket and had to redo the mobile base for a more powerful rocket. If the rocket is more powerful, then it should be increased. It is not possible to shove a more voluminous rocket engine and power to it the same tanks, steps.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: keel 31

the bullet is different, but the cartridge is the same.

The comparison is incorrect:
After the shot, the bullet flies to the target, and the cartridge case is ejected to the right of the insole. At Escander, a BULLET (warhead) flies towards a target along with a CARTRIDGE HOUSING (missile compartment!

Quote: keel 31

came up with a new rocket and had to redo the mobile base for a more powerful rocket. If the rocket is more powerful, then it should be increased.

For these purposes, there is a modernization base of the complex. And the "new" rocket was "invented"! This made the Americans howl! KVO = 1m!
You can imagine that with D = 500 + km rocket you can drive piles into the ground!

- Complex "Iskander-K" (2007) - according to media reports on May 29, 2007, during test launches of missiles of the Iskander-M complex at the Kapustin Yar test site, the R-500 missile of the Iskander-K complex was also tested for the first time "- a cruise missile with a range of 500 km, a cruising speed of 230-260 m / s, a flight duration of 24 minutes, a warhead weight of 500 kg, a CEP of about 1 m, an economical turbojet engine.
9K720 Iskander-M complex, 9M723-1 missile (2005) - extended-range OTR with a nuclear warhead. The first mention in the media - 2008. There is also the name "Tender".

[opus]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

And the "new" rocket was "invented"! This made the Americans howl! KVO = 1m!

Yes.
But this time we are talking about an AEROBALLISTIC ROCKET, not about the KR

something close to:

(then precisely detachable warhead)


I would also like such a stage of breeding and missile warheads

[Spnsr]

Quote: opus

I would also like such a stage of breeding and missile warheads

and so that each block flies along its unpredictable trajectory! to the desired goal, so that like a whirlwind!

[Markiz_A]

Why must a rocket be increased? There may be another engine, for a different type of fuel, while maintaining the size of the engine and increasing power ..

[Bochik]

Quote: Kil 31

Where the article says that they came up with a new rocket and had to redo the mobile base for a more powerful rocket. If the rocket is more powerful, then it should be increased. It is not possible to shove a more voluminous rocket engine and power to it the same tanks, steps.

"... We are talking about a NEW aeroballistic missile, which has already passed interdepartmental tests ..." - have you at least read an article or just looked at pictures? In your opinion, if the beater is larger, then it will burn stronger? Do the words "technology" and "scientific and technological progress" tell you anything? Or does it not fit in your head that a different engine can be put into the same rocket body - more powerful with the same dimensions? And pour fuel with a different chemical composition into the tanks, more effective?

[Boa kaa]

Quote: keel 31

Where is it written about a new rocket? It is written about the new warhead.

The article says, but you need to read carefully:

the company has created a new ammunition for the Iskander-M operational-tactical complex. It's about a new aeroballistic missile, which has already passed interdepartmental tests.

The fact is that the rocket of the Escander is an INTEGRABLE warhead. She flies to the target with the rocket compartment. (There will be more fragments!)
And the fact that there are already 5 of their varieties, plus 1 KR (R-500), so without being too lazy, you can read it on the Internet.

[kil 31]

Alexander. I’m talking about this

about a new aeroballistic rocket

I’ll not tell you something about the beauty of the word. Can you tell me how the rocket of your name differs from (aeroballistic rocket) what is this new name? Did you know that name before?

And the fact that there are already 5 of their varieties, plus 1 KR (P-500), so, without too laziness, you can read in the I-net

I am very proud, of course, that each system should have a different arsenal of ammunition. But for some reason it is written there, different in warheads, and not different in missiles. Different missiles, different launchers; CLASSIC.

[opus]

Quote: keel 31

Where is it written about a new rocket? It is written about the new warhead.

written New ammunition

Ammunition, this is a rocket for this OTR

Quote: keel 31

What is the warhead in this article?

to choose:

1.Cassette warhead (Types of combat elements):
non-contact shrapnel
- cumulative fragmentation
self-aiming
- volume-detonating
2.nuclear, power 5-50 ct
3. penetrating (all modifications)
4. high explosive (all modifications)
5. cumulative

The ammunition is most likely a modification of the 9M723-1 (9M723K1 / 9M723K5 / 9M723-1K5) OTP missile of an increased range capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

Maybe they did a detachable warhead (increased range, reduced probability of interception)

[Homo]

Quote: keel 31

What does the range have to do with it, it's about warheads.

What is warhead? The article says "... the company has created a new ammunition for the Iskander-M operational-tactical complex ..." And the ammunition is both a cartridge (for an assault rifle) and a projectile (for a weapon) and a rocket (for an Iskandre complex).

[kil 31]

Quote: Homo

Quote: keel 31

What does the range have to do with it, it's about warheads.

What is warhead? The article says "... the company has created a new ammunition for the Iskander-M operational-tactical complex ..." And the ammunition is both a cartridge (for an assault rifle) and a projectile (for a weapon) and a rocket (for an Iskandre complex).

What does a steel core mean in a pool, etc. etc. The cartridge has remained the same. The same warhead missile is different. Range can only change the mass of warheads. It does not say that the missile is enlarged and does not say that the base has been redone. It is written only about warheads.

[opus]

Quote: keel 31

Range can only change the mass of warheads.

1.New mixed fuel
2. Reducing the tare weight (shell)
3. Nozzle with high-altitude nozzle
4. A detachable warhead, or the introduction of the 2nd stage (the container does not need to be dragged)
5. Refusal from GDR with RM (eat up to 7% of thrust)
and the use of UVT (rotary nozzle)

6.New is the trend now: non-nozzle turbojet engine (though not UVT)
7. Stabilization and flight control by a rotary nozzle, rejection of aerodynamic surfaces, eat up 3-4% of speed)
8. Reducing the mass of BIP and avionics (it’s easy now)
One replacement of LKG with VOG will give 30-50 kilometers
8.Can continue

[Ami du peuple]

Quote: oleg-gr

Let Tonus be consumed.

Or so: let anus tone do not relax.

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX

Iskander have not been tested in real life yet.

In 2008, officers of the 1st department of the combat use center, together with the personnel of the 630th separate missile division, from the military airfield of Akhtubinsk by An-124 transport aircraft were transferred to the concentration area to fulfill the assigned combat mission. Two successful combat launches of 2M9 missiles of the Iskander complex were carried out. Orders and medals were awarded to officers of the 723th ORDN and the 630st department of the combat use center.

[Lord of the Sith]

But this news is very good. I usually wait for two news - this is the supply of S-400 and the development of missiles to them and here are the deliveries of Iskander-M and here is the development of new missiles to them. And then aviation, tanks and ships.

[Lukich]

Quote: oleg-gr

... You can't disappoint your "partners".

everything for them "loved ones"

[DMB3000]

Meanwhile ... New Su-35S fighters of the aviation regiment of the Air Force and Air Defense Association of the Eastern Military District interceded to protect the sky of the Khabarovsk Territory. On December 25, the aircraft took to combat alert air defense.

Su-35S aircraft were replaced on combat duty by Su-27SM fighters, Interfax notes. Several pairs of fighters will be on duty in shifts. For takeoff on alarm, planes from the Dzemgi airfield are given 16 minutes. The rearmament of Russian aviation with new combat vehicles begins in the Far East.

[remy]

not 16 but a 2-minute readiness for take-off.
the duty link sits in the tea room chasing teas!

[Sweles]

it’s necessary to hold a demonstration, let’s say the Iskander bombing a column of oil carriers near the border with Turkey, let them penetrate ...

[Vadim237]

The missile will be hypersonic anyway.

[1976AG]

Quote: Vadim237

The missile will be hypersonic anyway.

Are you in the subject? Enlighten?

[Vadim237]

An aeroballistic missile X 15 has a flight speed of 5 M, an Iskander rocket has a flight speed of 7 M, this new missile will be faster - than you are not hypersonic.

[Asadullah]

Iskander rocket has a flight speed of 7 M

I would very, very much like the speed of "Sasha" would be such .... but, we were born to make a fairy tale come true!

By and large, the possession of a b \ n moving at such a speed (possession, this means being armed, experiments do not count) raises the country's defense to an unattainable height. The speed of more than ten Machs, with a sure defeat of the target, dooms all the armies of the world for many years of envy and hopelessness.

[1976AG]

Quote: Vadim237

An aeroballistic missile X 15 has a flight speed of 5 M, an Iskander rocket has a flight speed of 7 M, this new missile will be faster - than you are not hypersonic.

But how do you know whether it will be faster or not !? Do you get information from the KB?

[Vadim237]

My production for the Votkinsk plant produces something - an adjacent production.

[Markiz_A]

500km at a speed of 7m - yes it will melt halfway.

[Wiruz]

And what is there to educate?
We look below - we are looking for the speed of the rocket. Keep in mind, the picture is far from yesterday. Not even the day before yesterday.

[1976AG]

So are you from the reference book for foreign intelligence?

[Wiruz]

So are you from the reference book for foreign intelligence?

Yeah, I just called headquarters in Langley, where the information was confirmed.

Turn on the brain, Iskander was originally created to break through the enemy’s missile defense. Such a missile must be invulnerable to the enemy. The easiest way to make it such is to accelerate to a speed at which interception is not possible. About the fact that an existing rocket has a speed of about 7 Machs, there have been conversations for a long time

[1976AG]

Yes, it’s you turn on the brain. Existing rockets already had the ability to go on hypersound.

[Wiruz]

Existing rockets already had the ability to go on hypersound.

So I’m talking about this. Then Vadim237 was attacked for his post that the new rocket would be hypersonic. But no one remembered that the old rocket is already hypersonic

[Lord of the Sith]

Quote: Wiruz

So I’m talking about this. Then Vadim237 was attacked for his post that the new rocket would be hypersonic. But no one remembered that the old rocket is already hypersonic

The Jedi were always too lazy to think, which is why they got burned.

[Asadullah]

The missile will be hypersonic anyway.

Do you at least explain that sometimes supersonic is confused with hypersound, otherwise you will scare away all our "partners", remove the sanctions and again wait for the thunder to break out in order to cross.

Hypersonic speed, this is for five Machs.

[1976AG]

Quote: Asadullah

The missile will be hypersonic anyway.

Do you at least explain that sometimes supersonic is confused with hypersound, otherwise you will scare away all our "partners", remove the sanctions and again wait for the thunder to break out in order to cross.

Hypersonic speed, this is for five Machs.

What will he explain if he himself is not in the know?

[Wiruz]

What will he explain if he himself is not in the know?

Well enlighten if you are so smart. What prevents a rocket from being hypersonic. I’ll clarify, we are talking about an aeroballistic missile!

[1976AG]

Yes, I don’t tell you what it will be if you did not notice. And nothing prevents her from being hypersonic. Moreover, given that the maximum flight altitude reaches 50 km., Then it will certainly be able to fly in hypersound. But if you want to say something on the rocket, let’s do it, otherwise you’ve started something ...

[Asadullah]

What prevents a rocket from being hypersonic

Nothing interferes. This hypersound prevents her from reaching the target. That is, from a certain moment, the so-called instability waves prevent the object from moving and the poor racket can fly the wrong way. For nuclear warheads, falling from space, even with a large error, is not relevant, and for tactical tasks it is not suitable.

[Wiruz]

Nothing interferes. This hypersound prevents her from reaching the target. That is, from a certain moment, the so-called instability waves prevent the object from moving and the poor racket can fly the wrong way. For nuclear warheads, falling from space, even with a large error, is not relevant, and for tactical tasks it is not suitable.

Here are the Americans fools. In vain, billions are spent on hypersonic CDs. And ours, too, it turns out, they do not shine with the mind - they are doing the same. You call the MO, warn them, at least save money

[Asadullah]

Here are the Americans fools. In vain, billions are spent on hypersonic CDs. And ours, too, it turns out, they do not shine with the mind - they are doing the same. You call MO, warn them, at least we’ll save money wassat

Well, from what. There is one loophole called the plasma tunnel. In it, the object moves without deviations and according to interesting Planck's laws, without resistance. That is, in a plasma tunnel, the speed of the object will depend only on the power of the engine. In addition to delivering several tons of unstable friendship of nitrogen with oxygen along a possible quantum "monorail", it can deliver electricity without losses and unlimited power. And for aircraft, this is generally a new leap of evolution. So what do you think is worth spending billions? After all, trying different ways to kick in the face with lightning speed, you can move humanity into a completely different world of scientific and technological revolution.

[Ami du peuple]

Quote: Vadim237

The missile will be hypersonic anyway.

Come on! Where does this infa come from? I can't believe the word "absolutely". Rather, increased range - since the Americans still accuse us of violating the INF Treaty, why not comply with this?

[Vadim237]

If we withdraw from the agreement on the reduction of the INF Treaty, we will only have minuses from this.

[Wiruz]

Come on! Where does this infa come from? I can't believe the word "absolutely". Rather, increased range - since the Americans are still accusing them of violating the INF Treaty, why not comply with this?

From there, the current Iskander-M missiles are already hypersonic. If I'm not mistaken - the speed is about 7 Mach.

Do not confuse hypersonic cruise missile and hypersonic ballistic

[opus]

Quote: Vadim237

The missile will be hypersonic anyway.

and so 2100m / s (though not at full height). From version 9M723-1 (with conformal cable channels and an improved engine)
But the definition of GLA, GLZL corresponds to - it is capable of flying in the atmosphere with hypersonic speed (greater than or equal to 5M; M is the Mach number) and maneuvering using aerodynamic forces.

[seti]

Fine. And in Kaliningrad to comb his western partners. You are coming to us in the Baltic states on tanks and we are sending you missiles to our western enclave. You look and can change the orientation

[Mountain shooter]

They are already in Kaliningrad. And in general with these "Iskander" - as with "Caliber". Until we light up a real enemy - no one will know what the range of this complex is five hundred kilometers, or fifteen hundred ...

[Denis Obukhov]

More rockets, good and different!

[1976AG]

Quote: Denis Obukhov

More rockets, good and different!

Different is not necessary. Looking great.

[Denis Obukhov]

500 km Oh well. If calibers fly 1.5-2k. Pure to fit into the contract. In a real war, it can suddenly fly 3k. So, by chance.

[Wiruz]

It is not necessary to equalize all the missiles with Caliber. A gauge is like a non-flying cruise missile with a subsonic flight speed

[vladimir_krm]

Another modification of the Iskander is armed with R-500 cruise missiles. Their speed is 10 times lower than that of 9M723K1 missiles, however, according to some sources, the R-500 can fly to a range of over 2 thousand km at an altitude not exceeding several meters above the ground.
http://topwar.ru/70171-tri-smerti-iskandera.html

[Vadim237]

It’s beneficial for us to keep the rocket flight ranges secret - so as not to get hit.

[bad]

The TASS news agency, citing Valery Kashin, reports that the Iskander-M OTRK can now be equipped with five types of aeroballistic missiles, as well as one cruise missile.

..heh .. we wait for hysterics from the "partners" ..

[opus]

Quote: bad

..heh .. we wait for hysterics from the "partners" ..

Government Prize received for a reason

We will wait for March / April and the annual report of JSC NPK KBM
there are m / y lines and we will see everything

[Alexey RA]

The TASS news agency, citing Valery Kashin, reports that now the Iskander-M OTRK can be equipped with five types of aeroballistic missiles, as well as one cruise missile.

And telegrams will fly here ... regarding violations by Russia of the INF Treaty.

[bad]

Quote: Ami du peuple

Quote: oleg-gr

Let Tonus be consumed.

Or so: let anus tone do not relax.

..

[iConst]

- Literate ...

[501 Legion]

I think they have long had rockets with a range of more than a thousand kilometers. and with nuclear warheads

[Pirogov]

It would be nice !

[Wiruz]

I think they have long had rockets with a range of more than a thousand kilometers. and with nuclear warheads

There is. "Caliber" are called. Well, or a sequel to "R-500". Several times in the domestic media, information has appeared that Iskander can work with subsonic cruise missiles with a flight range of about 2500 km.

And here, in fact, is the launch of the R-500 Iskaner. Find 10 differences from 3m14.

[Denis.Ka]

Virus, you do not confuse a case with this?

[Kasym]

The virus does not confuse, I also noticed that the ammunition is different on Iskander. Now in containers, as in the photo in the article. But I thought that there were only two of them. But the article says that there are 6 different ones (incl. One winged, rather some kind of Caliber). What !!!
I understand that under the agreement on short- and medium-range missiles more than 500 km. ground complexes are not allowed. But I think that Russia does not cost anything to put there a marine version of the Caliber with a range of 1500 km. (I don’t remember whether it is longer or not).

[opus]

Quote: Wiruz

There is. "Caliber" are called. Well, or a sequel to "R-500".

ZM-14, continuation of 3M10 "Granat" (with new avionics and GOS)
R-500 (9M728) is not a continuation of the KS-122 / 9B2413 missile (RK-55 / 3K12 / 9A2413 "Relief" complex). Everything is destroyed.

Quote: Wiruz

R-500 rocket launch Iskaner. Find 10 differences from 3m14.

Diameter, Length

Caliber (ZM-14) for the earth, it is 9M729 - SSC-X-8

The creation and testing of a similar missile in the ground version It is considered a violation of the INF Treaty, which was signed in 1987 between the USSR and the USA.



9M729GLCM (SSC-X-8)

Bill Gertz (I know!) Claimed that Russia had, on September 2, conducted another test of the ground-launched cruise missile that the United States claims violatesthe 1987 INF Treaty. Gertz indicated that the US designation is the “SSC-X-8.” I believe this missile is designated 9M729. There was a Russian announcement by GosNIIP, the design bureau that builds guidance for cruise missiles, that Russia completed state acceptance trials of the “ground-based system 9M728, 9M729 and its modernized version. ”

ours themselves blabbed from the annual report of the State Research Institute of Instrumentation:

[Dinko]

According to some reports, the caliber flies to a range of about 4 thousand km. And I think that it is so, if not further.

[samoletil18]

And I could not understand where Psaki finds charges against Russia. Here, now, a new Jennifer will be sent to the Internet, after reading this comment. I declare that the Iskander will not fire farther than 124 km for the entire network. The INF Treaty is unshakable. And the calibers flew 1500 km by mistake, the odometer jammed in flight.

[Bochik]

Quote: samoletil18

And the calibers for 1500 km flew by mistake, in flight the odometer jammed.

It’s just that the wind was fair and that’s where the figs flew away.

[Gormenghast]

Traditionally. Gorbachev sawed OTRK "Oka"that does not fall under the restrictions of the INF Treaty, in order to please the amers (although, in fact, it is the same as substituting an anus). Putin restored the sawn-off, at a new technical level, as an OTRK"Iskander"terrifying partners.

And so in many areas. Unfortunately, not everything that has been destroyed can be fixed.

[nrex]

And if you consider that the official range of destruction of some cruise missiles is designated as 4500 km, then this is a good regular splinter for the ass of any aggressor.

[podgornovea]

Wonderful, well, just magical news!
It’s a pity that just about Nothing!
I'm not talking about the characteristics, but "The TASS news agency, citing Valery Kashin, reports that now the Iskander-M OTRK can be equipped with five types of aeroballistic missiles," so what !?
At least the type of ip for what application!
And so you can say at least every year - "now the Iskander-M OTRK can be equipped with six types, now seven types, now forty-three types."

[podgornovea]

Not necessarily detailed performance characteristics, but at least differences from the four previous types: faster / farther / more powerful / less noticeable / more accurate / "just 2 times cooler" :)
At least the type of ip for what application!
And so you can say at least every year - "now the Iskander-M OTRK can be equipped with six types, now seven types, now forty-three types."

[Old26]

[quote = Vadim237] An aeroballistic rocket X 15 has a flight speed of 5 M, an Iskander rocket has a flight speed of 7 M, this new rocket will be faster - than you are not hypersonic. [/ quote]
ALL CURRENT ALREADY HYPERSONIC. To be even faster, you need to change the engine and fuel. Does it make sense?

[quote = Denis Obukhov] 500 km. Oh well. If calibers fly 1.5-2k. Pure to fit into the contract. In a real war, it can suddenly fly 3k. So, by chance. [/ Quote]
Accidentally, a girl can "fly over." A rocket, which now flies 500 km just like that, will not fly to a distance of 3000 km. It is with a liquid-propellant engine that you can replace the fuel or its amount. Solid propellant rocket usually has 100% fuel filling

[quote = vladimir_krm] Another modification of the Iskander is armed with R-500 cruise missiles. Their speed is 10 times less than that of 9M723K1 missiles, however, according to some sources, the R-500 can fly to a range of over 2 thousand km at an altitude not exceeding several meters above the ground.
"some sources" do not want to accept reality. Both the President of Russia and the Americans argue that the R-500 DOES NOT VIOLATE the INF Treaty. But "Some sources" - yes ...

[quote = 501Legion] I think they have long had missiles with a range of more than a thousand kilometers. and with nuclear war [/ quote]
Who do they have? The Americans or ours on Iskander "??? have a nuclear warhead planned, with a range of more than 1000 km on the Iskander there is simply no ... Do not indulge yourself with vain illusions

[quote = Kasym] The virus does not confuse, I also noticed that the ammunition is different on Iskander. Now in containers, as in the photo in the article. But I thought that there were only two of them. But the article says that there are 6 different ones (incl. One winged, rather some kind of Caliber). What !!!
I understand that under the agreement on short- and medium-range missiles more than 500 km. ground complexes are not allowed. But I think that Russia does not cost anything to put there a marine version of the Caliber with a range of 1500 km. (I don’t remember whether it is longer or not). [/ quote]
I'll start with the second part, with the second paragraph. 1500 things interfere with delivering a missile with a range of 2 km.
- First. The length of the KR 3M14 "Caliber" is almost 2 meters longer. Redesign the launcher ??
- Second. There is such a sacramental question. And nah.rena ??? Why do you need it, put it on a strike complex, in which the time of hitting a target is about 4 minutes, change it to a rocket that will "cut" 2 hours to the target ?? What for??? Or someone really wants it ???

Now about the first part (paragraph)
The fact that the complex has several rockets in service has been known for ... years. At least 12 types of such missiles are known. Plus one version of the CD. The second is being tested. Plus export options. Also about 5 missiles.
The cruise missile on the Iskander is not a variant of the Caliber. Although one KB makes them. This means that the developments are common

[quote = nrex] And when you consider that the official range of destruction of some cruise missiles is designated as 4500 km, then this is a good regular splinter for the ass of any aggressor. [/ quote]
Not at all. A splinter that goes to the goal of 6 hours

[Old26]

Quote: podgornovea

Not necessarily detailed performance characteristics, but at least differences from the four previous types: faster / farther / more powerful / more imperceptible / more accurate / "just 2 times cooler" :) At least the type of ip for what application! And so you can even report every year - " now the Iskander-M OTRK can be equipped with six types, now seven types, now forty-three types. "

rockets do not differ from each other in any special way. Neither faster, nor further, nor more imperceptible, nor more precisely, nor "just 2 times cooler"

[Appraiser]

The Iskander-M operational-tactical complex needs to be "tested" (since there is such a possibility) in Syria. As Pushkin A.S. says. : "... and experience, son of difficult mistakes."

[Yak28]

The main thing is that the operational-tactical complexes would go to the troops in hundreds, and not in a piece

[Aandrewsir]

It's good. Pleases. We have gifts for our "sworn friends"! Be spiteful ... and be ready to "accept gifts" if, God forbid, it comes to that ...

[Old26]

Quote: Appraiser

The Iskander-M operational-tactical complex needs to be "tested" (since there is such a possibility) in Syria. As Pushkin A.S. says. : "... and experience, son of difficult mistakes."

What for? This is called a sparrow shoot from a cannon. Without the ability to check the parameters. Yes, and why check a second time

Quote: Yak28

The main thing is that the operational-tactical complexes would go to the troops in hundreds, and not in a piece

Yeah. To each soldier in a personal operational-tactical complex. Hundred? And why not thousands ??? Why trifle, since the staffing in the army has become an empty phrase ....