The analytical program of Mikhail Leontyev "However," 23 December 2015

53


Against the background of a fall in oil prices, the message that Congress allowed the export of American oil made an impression of a control shot. Right now, flows of American oil will flow to the market, and everything will finally collapse. Do not pour and will not collapse.

The oil export ban imposed by the United States in response to the Arab oil embargo lasted more than 40 years. In order to achieve a majority in Congress, the oil lobby had to pledge more than a trillion dollars in subsidies for the development of alternative wind and solar energy.
That is literally thrown to the wind. What you will not do for the sake of the native American oil industry, which has already been lowered below the baseboard. Contrary to popular belief, America is not interested in low energy prices. She is interested in prices significantly lower than the main competitors.

The shale revolution in the United States provided fantastic growth in oil production, abruptly slowed down as a result of falling prices and turning into a decline in the 2016 year.

The Wall Street Journal, still at a price of about 50 dollars per barrel, wrote that shale companies had reached a limit in reducing their costs. When the number of drilling rigs in the industry fell over the year to 2 / 3. "24 largest shale companies reported losses totaling more than 62 billion dollars. At the moment we are talking about the best areas, the best equipment, the best personnel. All the cost reductions from now on will no longer be fat loss, but cutting the meat."

There is an opinion that the prices are lowered by the Saudis, increasing production to remove expensive oil from the market, primarily American slate.

This is a bold idea, considering how obsessed America is with its energy security. And now, when a couple of steps remained until the United States reached full energy independence, some Saudis decided to shoot the American shale revolution ?! Given the fact that Saudi Arabia itself exists only with the permission and under the guarantees of the United States. You must agree that the version looks much more convincing that the Saudis, and, by the way, not the first time, are fulfilling a responsible task - to remove from the market not even the Russian oil industry, but Russia itself.

That is, if we imagine that the current American administration is obsessed with anti-Putin revenge even more than its own energy security. And then the permission to export oil is additional evidence of that.

Now America produces 9,2 million barrels per day, consumes, processing at its plants 16,7. That is, America remains - and now, after the killing of the shale revolution, it will remain for a long time - the largest importer of oil. The peculiarity is that American factories are adapted for heavy imported oil - Venezuelan, Mexican ..., and all the additional shale production is light oil - WTI, which overwhelmed American stores and put pressure on quotes. This very oil will now be exported.

That is, because of American exports, there will no longer be any oil on the market; simply, American imports will grow accordingly. In order for US exports to threaten oil prices, the prices of this oil must be high enough to justify its production.

It seems to us that the Saudis shot the wrong one. Who they ordered. Or the customer did not see in the heat of the geopolitical struggle.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    24 December 2015 07: 30
    That's for the entire duration of the project, however, Leontiev always tells and shows the very essence of various issues. My respect to him. (The most interesting part of the news program)
    1. +14
      24 December 2015 07: 55
      It seems to us that the Saudis shot the wrong one. Who they ordered. Or the customer did not see in the heat of the geopolitical struggle.


      It's just like the Ukrainians, who is learning from whom? laughing
      1. +2
        24 December 2015 10: 52
        The scary thing is not who learns from whom, but the fact that our younger generation is also trying to learn from the West.
        Education is already sliding thanks to the woes of the reformers. Mid-level managers except for Western schemes do not know how to work at all.
        We are still taking a sip with this stupid copying of Western schemes.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      24 December 2015 08: 15
      Quote: kebeskin
      Leontiev always tells and shows the very essence of various issues.

      "ride a horse"
      the point is to free storage facilities, simultaneously destroying mining small things, and then fill these storage facilities, but from affiliated companies. Save the industry, free the market from competitors, and earn money. Oil then they throw to the world market. At the same time, the budgets of world competitors will dry out. This is a nerve-wracking game, and it’s invariant, because if the Americans get carried away, empty the storages significantly, the price will collapse, and oil will flow in the opposite direction. So in America itself, not even large grains will survive, which, again, for survivors means seizing the domestic market.
      1. +6
        24 December 2015 08: 37
        There is no question of any "wrong shot". A multi-vector combination is carried out:
        - An indicative "whipping" of oil-producing countries with signs of independence and a demonstration of the controllability of oil-producing "allies".
        - Financial weakening of Russia;
        - Rotation of oil reserves in storage;
        - Winning time, because slipped information about qualitative changes in shale mining technologies.
        Which of these is more important, "we do not know this", but together - the solution to many problems. hi
        1. 0
          24 December 2015 08: 46
          Quote: GrBear
          - Winning time, because slipped information about qualitative changes in shale mining technologies.

          moreover, both Miller and Leontyev themselves talk about it :) hi
          1. -2
            24 December 2015 10: 17
            Here are interesting videos, old, 2011, I think very much in the subject:
    4. +11
      24 December 2015 08: 25
      My respect to him.
      --------------------
      Leontiev is a jerk, a populist and a conjuncturist. Of those who, for the sake of a red word, will not regret their father. It is enough to see his screech from 30.11/2015/XNUMX, where he screeches about the stupidity of Miller, who supposedly overslept the shale revolution in America. Like, we are shamefully late with advanced technologies and we will all die in torment and poverty.
      You can also recall his rituals about “the dollar will die in a month”, which he has been howling periodically for the past twenty years. And that's what is interesting, these rituals always coincided with the next fall of the ruble, it smells like zakazukha, don't you think? I remember a video on the tragedy with Nord-Ost, when he arrived drunk in a snipe, vomited on the parapet and S'e .... hal. In general, my personal opinion is a venal skin through which its owners drain their shit.
      1. +3
        24 December 2015 08: 31
        Quote: guzik007
        In general, my personal opinion is a corrupt skin, through which its owners pour their govnosbrosy.

        it’s not entirely true on TV this show, and screeching is a struggle with competitors, but agree, to overturn Gazprom’s capitalization of 450 billion to 50? it needs talent
      2. +3
        24 December 2015 10: 20
        Leontyev, as well as the propaganda of the 1st channel, I consider it too clumsy, their obvious antagonist (and in terms of quality too) are old dissidents, such as those who say that the pickle was invented in the USSR "out of hunger" ( fool )
        Take a quick look at the history of the pickle, such stuffing as Leontyev will not do.
    5. -1
      24 December 2015 09: 52
      Quote: kebeskin
      Leontiev always tells and shows the very essence of various issues. My respect to him.

      I agree. However, I remember the time when Mr. Leontyev was not the top in Rosneft. And somehow it came out very sharply that Russia slept through the shale revolution and the consequences of such a dream can be terrible. I can only refer to my imperfect memory, excuse me. Whether that sharp appearance was connected with the sudden career take-off of Mr. Leontyev, I can’t judge. However, this take-off undoubtedly benefited both Leontyev and Rosneft, and, I'm afraid that sounds overly pathetic, to Russia. A rare case of a reasonable personnel policy, visible from below.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. 0
      24 December 2015 15: 17
      Quote: kebeskin
      That's for the entire duration of the project, however, Leontiev always tells and shows the very essence of various issues. My respect to him. (The most interesting part of the news program

      According to his programs, the shale revolution is a fairy tale, oil cannot be cheaper than 80 bucks, and the American economy collapsed yesterday.
      Analyst - However.
      1. +2
        24 December 2015 16: 16
        Quote: atalef
        Analyst - However.

        Accents are shifted, neatly so.
        I remember it was said
        Quote: atalef
        shale revolution - a fairy tale

        And what not, do not tell me the amount of subsidies for the development of this miracle?
        Quote: atalef
        oil is cheaper than 80 bucks not to be
        MUST ELSE ...
        Say no?
        Quote: atalef
        America’s economy collapsed yesterday.

        I don’t know how it is for you, it’s a mystery for me how the state economy with 18 trillion foreign debt can function normally. And if you recall the inner ...
        That's just how much the rope does not curl ... The higher the pyramid, the greater the roar ...
        1. -2
          24 December 2015 17: 20
          Quote: Cynic
          And what not, do not tell me the amount of subsidies for the development of this miracle?

          What for ? She did her job - prices collapsed.
          OPEC has raised its medium-term demand forecast. In a review last year, oil demand by 2020 was expected to reach 29 million barrels per day.

          The new review softens the theme of the cartel’s struggle with the American “shale”, which was first raised in 2012. The previous years of high prices for black gold, which were achieved by the usual policy of reducing production at the right time, led to a sharp increase in production and unconventional types of oil, such as shale. Now OPEC is forced to admit that many shale projects remain cost-effective at lower prices than previously thought. The conclusion for the cartel is disappointing, because it implies that even at 2015 prices, production growth may continue.

          You probably know more OPEC laughing
          http://expert.ru/2015/12/23/v-opek-priznali-oshibku/?ny

          Quote: Cynic
          MUST ELSE ...
          Say no?

          Of course, if it stands (now) - 35 - then it could be different
          Quote: Cynic
          I don’t know how it is for you, it’s a mystery for me how the state economy with 18 trillion foreign debt can function normally.

          Elementary, this is as much as she earns in a year.
          You don’t care how Great Britain or Ireland or Italy lives - if they have debts - 300% of GDP, or as an example, you or your neighbor (having a mortgage) - when there are debts of 5 annual salaries, but he doesn’t live and Yes, it may flourish
          Quote: Cynic
          And if you recall the inner ...

          Remember ... and how? Did it help?
          Quote: Cynic
          That's just how much the rope does not curl ..

          Yes, it was still Lenin who said

          Quote: Cynic
          The higher the pyramid, the greater the roar ...

          that's for sure, you hope did not mean oil prices?
          1. 0
            24 December 2015 18: 05
            Quote: atalef
            that's for sure, you hope did not mean oil prices?
            1. 0
              24 December 2015 18: 12
              Quote: Cynic
              Quote: atalef
              that's for sure, you hope did not mean oil prices?

              Well, an associate professor, of course, an authoritative thief laughing
  2. +2
    24 December 2015 07: 32
    Why does the US hate Russia so much that it is trying to destroy it at the cost of such expenses?
    1. +21
      24 December 2015 07: 41
      Russia is to blame for the fact that it exists ...
    2. +12
      24 December 2015 07: 42
      For the fact that Russia is the only country in the world that REALLY can destroy the United States. But both Gorbachev and Yeltsin - so they wanted to be friends with her. So they wanted ... What kind of god should we pray that Russia did not finally bend from this friendship?
      1. 0
        24 December 2015 08: 47
        Do you think NATO will be nervously on the sidelines smoking when Russia will destroy the United States?
        1. +3
          24 December 2015 09: 49
          NATO will also rake in full. If we clash with the empire of lies, little will not seem to anyone, including New Zealand and Australia. smile
        2. -1
          24 December 2015 12: 28
          The third world war will begin. But that’s sad. NATO (a bunch of countries) against Russia.
    3. +4
      24 December 2015 07: 54
      Quote: L.A. A.
      Why does the US hate Russia so much that it is trying to destroy it at the cost of such expenses?

      And for the fact that in the past Russia helped the United States and the US survive in the most difficult years for Americans, starting with the Boston Tea Party. Look at the story.
    4. +9
      24 December 2015 08: 00
      Why does the US hate Russia so much
      Nothing personal. We are very, very rich. The USA, offered (according to rumors), 20 trillions of greens for Siberia. So that gingerbread is worth the candle.
      1. +2
        24 December 2015 09: 57
        Quote: avva2012
        We are very, very rich.

        Are we you and Sechin? Why not write that Russia is very rich? Will it humiliate you?
    5. +16
      24 December 2015 08: 28
      Quote: L. A. A.
      Why does the US hate Russia so much that it is trying to destroy it at the cost of such expenses?

      Why don't they love us so much? We were loved in the 90s, when we were a colony of the West, when the drunken president agreed with all the delusional agreements and statements of the West, we will not be seen for the fact that we are dying while standing and do not exist on our knees, because we have a huge territory and huge wealth, because we have our own opinion, but they hate it because we still live on our land and they are not the owners here, because we don’t grovel in front of them as in their colonies, but simply because we still live after all "democratic" reforms, and will always be hated.
      1. +2
        24 December 2015 09: 26
        There is still a strong influence of the revenge of the USA. They are very vindictive by nature. They are still Russia for the return of the Crimea will try to take revenge.
        1. +2
          24 December 2015 10: 00
          vengeance is cruelty, and cruelty is cowardice.
      2. +2
        24 December 2015 10: 03
        They didn’t love us even then. They kicked everyone and sundry, starting from the USA to small Baltic states.
        All der taught democracy .....
    6. +2
      24 December 2015 09: 32
      Quote: L. A. A.
      Why does the US hate Russia so much that it is trying to destroy it at the cost of such expenses?

      The mystery of lawlessness in action.
    7. +2
      24 December 2015 09: 57
      FSH is a teenage nation, sort of strong, but cowardly and very stupid.
      If Russia falls, automatically all countries of the World will become their full vassals, including China and India.
      But the empire of lies will never go to an open confrontation with Russia - it’s elementary scary. So rage and dirty, as they can. The heirs of the Naglo-Saxon policy, what to take from them? That is how disagreeable countries will set on each other until they die, and this will happen over the next 20 years.
    8. +3
      24 December 2015 10: 11
      L.A.A. Do not destroy the final goal, but clean up the entire territory. Like Iraq, Libya, etc. There is no information on the surface who and how is trading in the oil of these states.
  3. +1
    24 December 2015 07: 34
    Without sound.... sad

    Found with sound: https://www.1tv.ru/news/leontiev/298828
  4. +3
    24 December 2015 07: 34
    It seems to us that the Saudis shot the wrong one. Who they ordered. Or the customer did not see in the heat of the geopolitical struggle.


    Yes, here it seems that as a result of a shootout, many players on a stretcher will have to be taken out of the battlefield .... the most tenacious ones will crawl out by themselves.
  5. Riv
    +1
    24 December 2015 07: 35
    The author’s reasoning is naive. You can not sell your own oil, but bought from ISIS at a low price. In addition, it is possible to drive for export not oil, but its refined products. I wonder when it will reach our oil workers?
    1. +4
      24 December 2015 07: 48
      Recently, there has been such a tendency that Yusa does not conceive and begins to realize, it’s something for them for their gobbers! This is what Leont'ev meant.
    2. +5
      24 December 2015 07: 50
      Quote: Riv
      The author’s reasoning is naive. You can not sell your own oil, but bought from ISIS at a low price.

      and yours, therefore, are not "naive" ... Well, well ... "Drive ISIS oil for export." You yourself, at least listen to this nonsense.
    3. 0
      24 December 2015 07: 56
      In a globalized world, all markets are divided, including the oil refining market. They will not let us in. ISIS oil, who will resell, the United States? The Saudis will not, because if they buy 13 dollars per barrel from the spirits, then their prime cost is 2 dollars.
      1. Riv
        0
        24 December 2015 09: 30
        But Turkey is reselling it safely? What prevents the United States from doing the same? The Syrian oil shop seems to be coming to an end, but there is still Libyan and Iranian. Nothing personal, it's just a business.
        1. 0
          24 December 2015 09: 57
          Quote: Riv
          What prevents the United States from doing the same?

          answer the basic question - why?
          Of course, our confidence that the States have fingers in all pies is growing stronger every day - from smuggling of ivory in Sudan (the loot, by the way, also goes to the maintenance of "bad" groups smile ) before trading plots on the moon. Washington's hand is everywhere.
          1. Riv
            0
            24 December 2015 14: 50
            How is "why"? Loot the same.
            1. 0
              24 December 2015 18: 37
              Quote: Riv
              How is "why"? Loot the same.

              Excuse me, aren't you funny yourself? What the fuck is "loot"? This low-standard fuss with extreme low-quality processing and fuel trucks, in your opinion, brings some kind of money to the States? Yes, out of disgust they will not stick into this trash. This is a platform for Syrian, Iraqi and Turkish traders. What does the States have to do with it?
              1. Riv
                0
                25 December 2015 09: 27
                Brings, or brings. Guarantee. For never have the States sent an army to a place where they would not subsequently expect to recoup their losses.
    4. +6
      24 December 2015 08: 08
      Quote: Riv
      The author’s reasoning is naive. You can not sell your own oil, but bought from ISIS at a low price. In addition, it is possible to drive for export not oil, but its refined products. I wonder when it will reach our oil workers?

      I don’t know, I don’t know who is naive here ... what In the territory controlled by ISIS, 20 to 40 thousand barrels of oil are produced per day, and the United States consumes an average of 16,7 million barrels - also per day. The maximum production of ISIS is just over 2% of the required US. In addition, the USA is the largest oil producer (from 9 to 11 million barrels per day); The USA, Russia and Saudi Arabia constantly occupy the first three places in the world in production: one country will come forward, then another.
      Exporting processed products is, of course, great. Here are just countries that consumers also believe that it is more profitable to produce at home, and duties are introduced on the finished product, and raw materials for processing - without duty.
      1. Riv
        0
        24 December 2015 09: 33
        In fact, 2% of the oil consumed by the States is a lot of money. But who told you that the volumes mined in ISIS are just that? Perhaps they are an order of magnitude larger. And why did you decide that the oil exported by the States would cross their border? This is not at all necessary.
      2. +2
        24 December 2015 09: 37
        A competent answer, not emotion of originality. Thank.
        Quote: andj61
        I don’t know, I don’t know who is naive here ...
      3. +2
        24 December 2015 10: 05
        Quote: andj61
        I don’t know, I don’t know who is naive here ...

        Here you are in doubt. And the one who caught the Author of naivety - no. You never know that the top in Rosneft. And they didn't kick him out of the box - no, no, and you come across his "However". Naive, like a girl who went to IS for love.
        1. +2
          24 December 2015 12: 24
          Quote: 97110
          Naive as a girl who went to the IG for love.

          good Beautiful phrase - you must remember!
          As for the fact that Leontyev is a top manager of Rosneft, he is in his main specialty, that is, in the propaganda of the top, and not in the main profile of the corporation. His statements about the fact that US oil refineries are all completely sharpened to process extremely heavy oil from Venezuela and the Gulf of Mexico, and light oil is not processed - after all, a kind of slyness. The Saudis have been selling theirs for a year now! - oil in the USA at a discount to the main price by $ 1,5-2 per barrel. And they buy and recycle! Yes, and shale oil - also light - no one in the United States would have started to extract if they could not process it - after all, the ban on oil exports from the United States was in effect at the height of the rapid growth of shale oil production.
          Therefore, his conclusion that permission to export oil from the United States will not lead to a further drop in oil prices is also partly crafty. And this, and a slight increase in quotas for production by OPEC countries (it was 30 million barrels per day, became 31,5 million, although in 2015 the quotas exceeded and produced 32 million each), and the expectation of oil supplies from Iran, and even the readiness of the countries- exporters, including Russia, to sell oil cheaply because of difficulties in the economy - all this affects prices, and by no means in a favorable way for Russia.
          1. 0
            24 December 2015 18: 17
            Quote: andj61
            His statements about the fact that the US refineries are all completely refined for the processing of exceptionally heavy oil from Venezuela and the Gulf of Mexico, while light oil is not processed, is still a kind of cunning.

            Light oil, it is much easier to process :) "vapors" seem to "fly" themselves, besides, there is a lot of sulfur in heavy oil, and besides the need for cleaning, it is also a dangerous occupation, iron saturated with sulfur ignites from the ingress of air.
    5. 0
      24 December 2015 08: 27
      It has long come to seem.

      http://www.nefttrans.ru/analytics/rossiyskoe-toplivo-pokoryaet-evropu.html
      http://www.inopressa.ru/article/17jun2014/ft/diesel.html
      http://www.vedomosti.ru/business/articles/2014/06/16/rost-eksporta-dizelya-iz-ro
      ssii-bet-po-europejskim-npz
  6. +1
    24 December 2015 07: 47
    Or the customer did not see in the heat of the geopolitical struggle.

    Which is also possible, if we take into account the actions of the United States in the international arena in recent years. In foreign policy, failure after failure. And if it weren’t for the satellites looking in their mouths and not the bucks, like the world currency, then the United States would have long been in the fringes of politics.
    1. -5
      24 December 2015 08: 09
      Quote: rotmistr60
      then the United States would have long been in the back of politics.

      the country, whose economy is number 1 in the world, a priori cannot be "in the backyard".
      Quote: rotmistr60
      In foreign policy, failure after failure.

      there were no particular failures.
      1. +1
        24 December 2015 08: 30
        Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria - that's enough. Do you remember the achievements? Probably the isolation of Russia and the "torn to shreds" economy?
        1. +3
          24 December 2015 08: 46
          Quote: rotmistr60
          Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria - this is already enough.

          quite. Is it like with a half-empty / half-full glass - swing BV and Central Asia by placing the maximum number of players at the gambling table, knowing that half of them are cheaters - is it a failure or a success? Destabilize Europe by pumping it up with migrants, which diverts political and economic resources and weakens the European economy - a failure or a tactical victory? Turning your guilt into "collective responsibility" - how's that?
          The methods are undoubtedly dirty, but following the Jesuit formula "the end justifies the means", I would not be in a hurry to consider the actions of the States as absolutely failures.
          1. 0
            24 December 2015 09: 04
            Well, at least here it is not completely, but agree.
          2. 0
            24 December 2015 09: 07
            And about the "torn to shreds" economy, the colleague rotmistr60 got excited. It is enough to look at the S & P500 chart to see that the US economy has not felt as good as it is now. Another thing is that an era of great turbulence is coming in the world and it is more painful to fall from a great height.
            1. 0
              24 December 2015 11: 44
              about the "torn to shreds" economy, colleague rotmistr60 got excited

              Have you read my comment?
              1. 0
                24 December 2015 12: 48
                Quote: rotmistr60
                about the "torn to shreds" economy, colleague rotmistr60 got excited

                Have you read my comment?

                yes, perhaps, misunderstandings came out about shreds laughing
      2. +2
        24 December 2015 08: 41
        For all its gigantic economy (about a quarter of world GDP), mattresses live far beyond their means and have astronomical internal and external debt. This cannot go on forever. And will not be. The paragraph is coming.
        1. 0
          24 December 2015 08: 59
          Quote: Naum
          and have astronomical internal and external debt.

          So what? The trend to buy American debts continues (with us, too, albeit with a downward trend). Ten-year bonds are traded with a yield of 3%. US Debt Service
          while given cheaply.
          Quote: Naum
          The paragraph is coming.

          Everyone understands perfectly well that the "paragraph" in this case is coming global.
      3. +1
        24 December 2015 08: 44
        Quote: Zeppelin ml.
        Quote: rotmistr60
        then the United States would have long been in the back of politics.

        the country, whose economy is number 1 in the world, a priori cannot be "in the backyard".
        Quote: rotmistr60
        In foreign policy, failure after failure.

        there were no particular failures.

        It depends on what counts as a "special" failure.
        There have been enough failures in recent years. As with a "hodovka" by car - you are driving along the road, you feel good and comfortable - but holes begin - you catch one, second, third .... - it seems not scary? - we rush on - but at a certain moment you begin to understand that the "hodovka" is broken - of course, you can continue to rush ahead on an increasingly roaring, vibrating car, but for how long? - right, until the wheels fall off!
        It seems to us that the Saudis shot the wrong one. Who they ordered. Or the customer did not see in the heat of the geopolitical struggle.

        What we wish them from the bottom of our hearts!
  7. +1
    24 December 2015 07: 53
    The result of the "control shot" was that there was no difference in price between American and European oil. "Brent" lost another $ 3 in value, and that seems to be all. Now they will grow "in pairs."
  8. +1
    24 December 2015 08: 09
    As usual, the Americans wanted to spoil us, but they spoiled themselves.
    Russia has far-reaching plans, see .. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccV7256dTO0&index=30&list=WL
  9. +2
    24 December 2015 08: 15
    Everything that happens only confirms the truth: Lord, protect us from such "friends", and we ourselves will get rid of enemies.
  10. -1
    24 December 2015 08: 37
    Everyone will be rewarded according to his deeds! Striped - too. Any two-edged sword. What they did in the late 80s with the USSR will not work with Russia. The country is mobilizing: the enemy is on the verge!
    1. +2
      24 December 2015 09: 51
      The country is mobilizing: the enemy is on the verge!

      Is it possible in more detail? Are the people working for free for Uncle (and not for the country) massively ready for Greatness? So there is no work! Reductions rod ... ZP reduced ... Prices are rising .. The country has tens of millions, to put it mildly, low-income! Am I saying something wrong?
      So on the basis of what who is united? Is it possible in more detail?
      1. +1
        24 December 2015 10: 06
        Quote: kazachyok69
        So on the basis of what who is united? Is it possible in more detail?

        I also do not understand those who think exclusively in slogans. The romance of the 30s or 50s is clearly not in use now. What the hell is mobilization? “Let's rally the ranks around the Guarantor!” Or what? For half of the country, the question of survival comes first, not "the enemy on the doorstep."
        1. +1
          24 December 2015 12: 29
          Aha! Khazanov did not give the crown to the "guarantor" for nothing.
  11. 0
    24 December 2015 09: 20
    "The USA offered (according to rumors)" This is OBS. Or grandmothers at the entrance. Or in public transport, as they say, those who compose and spread rumors. And who was offered to you personally?
  12. +2
    24 December 2015 09: 48
    Mikhail Leontiev lol
    Is he a Patriot? FUNNY that he scratches! Nobody else would be hounding about the States ... but this one? The son of a US citizen .... He raised him as a Patriot? And now something is poisoning the People? Misha himself A member of the directors of Rosneft .. An extremely rich journalist, an oil specialist! And all our "Patriotic" personalities are like that!
    1. +2
      24 December 2015 10: 14
      Quote: kazachyok69
      Mikhail Leontiev
      Is he a patriot? Amusing

      He is the director of the Rosneft info department. Getting the salary of a top manager from Sechin, you can fuss about oil. True, he works out the truth - in August, Avon stood up for the image of the owner. Leontiev is the same biased profursetka as the rest of the drawer.
  13. +1
    24 December 2015 11: 00
    One recently, at a talk show, Zhirinovsky promised to bring down the price of gasoline, diesel and gas with electricity inside the country ten times (well, for example, gasoline at 3 rubles) ... And according to him, Russia will make a giant leap in the economy .. .And now I wondered if this could actually be? Will cheap energy rush up the economy inside the country?
    1. 0
      24 December 2015 11: 08
      Quote: Barkhan
      Will cheap domestic energy rush up the economy?

      how? And who will compensate for the loss of the fuel and energy complex with a dead ruble? And that is precisely why fuel is getting more expensive, despite oil becoming cheaper. And in general, it is more likely to become a sentence to the oil industry, which needs long-term investments.
  14. -1
    24 December 2015 11: 52
    The fact that shale died is a fact! It remains to decide what to do with the corpse)
    1. 0
      24 December 2015 12: 32
      To the morgue - so to the morgue.
      1. 0
        24 December 2015 12: 53
        Quote: WINovikov
        To the morgue - so to the morgue.

        smile mark my word: the stinking corpse of the "shale revolution" will still be dug out)))
        Technology will develop and cheapen. Traditions can't stop progress! Well, and so on blah blah blah ...
        1. 0
          24 December 2015 13: 20
          What are you telling them? "The slate is dead" !!!! Yeah, yeah ... that's something we have flooded with the development of "slate" ... on TV they seem to brag .... Everywhere the shale died, but is it developing in Russia? Rave!
          1. 0
            24 December 2015 14: 09
            Quote: kazachyok69
            Everywhere shale has died, but is developing in Russia? Rave!

            Well, this is to comrade Leontyev) Let him tell you how much Rosneft hydraulic fracturing a year does)
            Although, under sanctions, it is clearly less) Or did Schlumberger leave our market? She was once fucked up over non-compliance with sanctions against Iran and Sudan)
            1. 0
              24 December 2015 14: 54
              lol Not ... it would be better if Mr. Leontyev spoke about how they sell 19% of Rosneft’s shares to the Chinese ... What’s their state-owned assets are the best ... at the same time, patriots like him at the loot poison Yeltsin privatization ... All these 15 years they have been selling Assets (in the big case, to themselves and their relatives), but they are silent about it ...
              By the way, Putin lit up at his meeting saying about the RFP managers - like, if there are no such RFPs, no one will be normal ... Does he call Sechin-Neftianik a genius? Maybe Yakunin escaped? Miller? Miller and the others are probably not old friends, but Geniuses? Compare Vyakhirev biography or Chernomyrdin and the same Miller! Here's a pro then!
              1. 0
                24 December 2015 17: 49
                Quote: kazachyok69
                Not ... it would be better if Mr. Leontyev spoke about how Makar sells 19% of Rosneft to the Chinese ...

                but Sechin said that index s / n tops while will not be. A lemon in a month will remain ... Tighten the belt.
                Quote: kazachyok69
                Compare Vyakhirev biography or Chernomyrdin and the same Miller!

                so what? Uncle Millie has already become an icon for "young men contemplating life." An example is taken from him - from MNS to Forbes. laughing Like there - pesetas y gloria. Our everything, b / \ in ...