The submarine "Kuzbass" will return to the Pacific Fleet by the end of the year

The submarine K-419 "Kuzbass" (project 971U "Pike-B") completed repairs at the Far East plant "Zvezda" and will return to the base of the Pacific Fleet submarines before the end of the year, reports Lenta.ru report.

“Kuzbass was repaired for quite a long time, from 2009 of the year, formally it was the restoration of technical readiness, but in fact the boat underwent a full-fledged average repair with the replacement of a significant part of equipment with modern analogues,” a source in the defense industry told the publication.

“The nuclear submarine K-419 was laid down in Komsomolsk-on-Amur on July 28, 1991, launched on May 18, 1992 and transferred to December 31, 1992 the fleet. From April 1993 to January 1998 it bore the name "Walrus", subsequently renamed "Kuzbass". One of the most popular submarines of the Pacific Fleet in the 1990s - 2000s, repeatedly performing combat service tasks in various areas of the ocean, ”recalls the online edition.

Boats of the 971 project have an underwater displacement of about 10 thousand tons, reach speeds up to 33 catch and sink to 600 m. Crew - human 73.

As part of the fleet is 11 similar submarines (a total of 14 boats built). Another Nerpa submarine at 2012 was leased to India for 10 years with the new name S-72 Chakra.

Comments

[seti]

Great news. Given the latest developments in a timely manner.

[Byshido_dis]

I recently read the "Spy's Memo" on VO ... You know, I'm not going to play your games. I don't care what you think and lie. And the current composition of the Pacific Fleet is not your business, this is the business of the Russian Navy!

[gaura]

Emotionally, but not reasoned. Compared with the fleets of Japan, China and other Asian republics, our Pacific Fleet is far behind. The rest is your emotions and hatred

[Byshido_dis]

Emotionally, but not reasoned. Compared with the fleets of Japan, China and other Asian republics, our Pacific Fleet is far behind. The rest is your emotions and hatred

Where are your arguments? By the Japanese fleets? As far as I remember, they are forbidden to build large warships. About China is possible, but in terms of quality and efficiency, they lag behind us. And finally ABOUT WHAT OTHER COUNTRIES? What are you saying? Or ashamed?

[lelikas]

Quote: Byshido_dis

As far as I remember they are forbidden to build large warships.

And they, along the way, do not know about it ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: Wiruz

You can wipe your comments. Modernization is, of course, good, but you can’t get far on it. Look at the current composition of the Pacific Fleet - cry. This is especially true for surface ships.

Hmm, sadly, but there is some truth in your words. We laid the 7th Borei-A, and Ash trees don’t itch ... Kazan, if, as they promise, will be lowered in the 16th year, it will be fine, and Novosibirsk , Krasnoyarsk and Arkhangelsk God knows when we will see ... with mock-ups of Leaders and Shkvalov we run through exhibitions, but we don’t build, and the fleet is aging. Modernization will add another 15 years to the service of ships built back in the USSR, and then it’s not clear what ... ships of the first rank are not built, and watchdogs are built like US aircraft carriers for 7-10 years.
We are stagnating with the Ladas. We are modernizing the Varshavyanki again, while we still need Ladas yesterday and in large quantities.

[Garris199]

Quote: NEXUS

Hmm, sadly, but there is some truth in your words. We laid the 7th Borei-A, and Ash trees do not itch to lay.

Exactly. There are enough strategists, 3 Boreas in the ranks, 3 under construction, 5 667 BDRM in the ranks, there is one typhoon. You can wait a bit with them, but MCAPL (the main striking force of the Navy) is sharply insufficient. Isn't it better to allocate extra power for them?

[NEXUS]

Quote: Garris199

Exactly. There are enough strategists, 3 Boreas in the ranks, 3 under construction, 5 667 BDRM in the ranks, there is one typhoon. You can wait a bit with them, but MCAPL (the main striking force of the Navy) is sharply insufficient. Isn't it better to allocate extra power for them?

So the building of Kazan was moved to the right for a year, that is, until the 17th year ... which means that the other 3 Ash trees were also moved ... it's all sad, damn it

[Atrix]

Quote: Byshido_dis

Who wrote that we forgot about the Pacific Fleet? You can wipe your idle talk !!!

You are sorry, of course, but boat repairs have been carried out for 6 years ??? And do you consider this a success ??? In the United States during this time, two or three boats will be built from scratch. What are you talking about, for this you need to shoot for such repairs for 6 years.

full average repair

Damn if the average repair they have 6 years, then a complete repair what will be 12 years ??? In Soviet times or in China, the entire plant would be put up against the wall and shot for such a repair period.

[Turner38]

Just the same exactly according to the training manual comments. A couple of days ago, the article was. It’s time for the authorities to inform you that you need to upgrade the troll technology!

[cniza]

As part of the fleet is 11 similar submarines (a total of 14 boats built). Another Nerpa submarine at 2012 was leased to India for 10 years with the new name S-72 Chakra.

By grain, by grain, everything is being restored.

[kil 31]

The appearance after the end of the Cold War in the Russian fleet of new super-hidden nuclear-powered ships has caused serious concern in the United States. In 1991, this issue was raised in Congress. Several proposals were submitted for discussion by American lawmakers aimed at correcting the situation in favor of the United States. In accordance with them, it was assumed, in particular:
- require our country to make public its long-term programs in the field of submarine shipbuilding;
- establish for the Russian Federation and the United States agreed restrictions on the quantitative composition of multipurpose nuclear submarines;
- assist Russia in the conversion of shipyards building nuclear submarines to produce non-military products.

As I understand it, their requirements are not relevant right now. If we do not write off, modernization, repair and commissioning. Stamp the pots at the shipyards yourself.

[Denis Obukhov]

We should try it on Turkomans ..


clickable.

[Dangerous]

Cool submarine! Apparently in the near future it will remain our main hunter for nuclear submarines and ships, since Ash is held back

[Wiruz]

The Schuka-B project was really successful. Eh ... But once such submarines were built in a year and a half

[Byshido_dis]

Are you implying that we are not building anything? And what is being built is really bad? Can you still say that Russia has not invented anything new after the USSR?

[Dangerous]

He does not hint, but says how it was, not how it is. Eagles were accepted into the fleet for 5 years, including laying, launching and testing during this period. "Ordinary" submarines in 1,5 - 2 years, sharks in 3 years. And your hysteria on a generally ordinary comment is hardly explainable

[Byshido_dis]

The fact of the matter is that "THIS" is not an ordinary comment.

[shans2]

Warsaw women now rent in 2 years, the last one was built and accepted in 1 year 10 months ... there are no problems with submarines now, there are no problems with the construction of a surface fleet in time, a 15-year-old downtime almost killed the shipyard ... now everything is being restored, the main thing is people , but the problem is already beginning to be overcome.

[lelikas]

Quote: Dangerous

He does not hint, but says how it was, not how it is. Eagles were accepted into the fleet for 5 years, including laying, launching and testing during this period. "Ordinary" submarines in 1,5 - 2 years, sharks in 3 years. And your hysteria on a generally ordinary comment is hardly explainable

Well, to be honest, only the Kalinin in five years, the rest take longer, not to mention the entry into the fleet, it is even longer, but the principle is correct.
And if they had not yet arranged such a meaningless variety in projects - so boats would have done faster.

[kamski]

Nothing new, an average boat repair 10 years in the USSR, a boat was built in a year. All that is still developments of the USSR

[Anton Gavrilov]

The dry real numbers are that it took 5 ~ 6 years on average to build nuclear submarines in the USSR, in some cases more.

[VNP1958PVN]

"Nuclear submarine K-419 laid in Komsomolsk-on-Amur on July 28, 1991, launched on May 18, 1992 and December 31, 1992 transferred to the fleet.

These should be the pace of work, and not from the 9th to the 15th repair!

[Byshido_dis]

Under the phrase "repair" can be anything you like, don't you really think that our aircraft will scream at every corner about what awesome system they have installed or what cool missiles they will launch now or what cool new reactor have they installed ??

[aleks 62 next]

The nuclear submarine K-419 was laid down in Komsomolsk-on-Amur on July 28, 1991, launched on May 18, 1992, and handed over to the fleet on December 31, 1992.
.... from such should be the pace of work, and not from the 9th to the 15th - repairs! ...

.... So the plant was .... Wow, th .... !!!! Where to Severodvinsk .... Unfortunately - was ....

[kote119]

in Severodvinsk, the NSR was more powerful, and boats of all classes were built

[aleks 62 next]

.... in Severodvinsk the NSR was more powerful, and boats of all classes were built ...

.... It was not more powerful ... In terms of area - yes .... In terms of the number of people working on it among similar ones - no ... At the ZLK, about 50 thousand worked at the best times, in Severodvinsk about 30 thousand. (data for the mid-80s) ....

[lelikas]

Quote: aleks 62 next

. Where is Severodvinsk ...

Oh, well ...

[shans2]

Now there is no such pace of work anywhere in the world, equipment has become more complicated at times, in the US, submarines have also not been built in 2 years already ....

[Anton Gavrilov]

For reference, there have never been and never will be "such" rates in the world.

Here, in the photo, what was at the time of laying the Asashai Colorado. Here really it’s impossible to even think and understand how to BUILD THIS IT ALL STARTED NOT FROM THE BOOKING DAY!

In modern submarines only on the hull, the 1 HOUSING ONLY takes about 2's.

It is Asashai’s people who most of all love to use this trick for propaganda. They have Virginia’s buildings, now it takes about 5 years on average, the period is gradually decreasing from series to series, but they usually lay them now after more than 3 years of construction, when the boats already in a high degree of readiness.

The USSR did the same, too! Therefore, it is here and it seems to everyone that SHOWER WHAT TIME IS STAKHANOV!

I’m just creepy, and furiously infuriates me when people, TOTALLY NOT DROPING, UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTION, WRITE ANY FUCK!

I don’t climb into posts about tanks, I don’t climb into posts about missiles, armored personnel carriers and other things. I’m there 0, AND I DON’T WRITE ANY Crap IN THIS COMMENT! T

So be so kind as not to tremble the nerves to us sailors! With us, they tremble without end and edge, taking into account matters with the fleet.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

So be so kind as not to tremble the nerves to us sailors! With us, they tremble without end and edge, taking into account matters with the fleet.

And on Ladas it is quiet and dark as on the seabed ... Vashavyanka is a noble submarine, but only a project still created under the Union, but we cannot give birth to Lada ...
Best regards

[Anton Gavrilov]

Yes, yes, and yeahhhhhhh, not only problems with Lada .....

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

Yes, yes, and yeahhhhhhh, not only problems with Lada .....

Yes, I know ... damn it ... The ash-trees are stopped, and they are like air to us ... and not only the seams with them ... the destroyers and corvettes are scraped, but in the iron there is still zero ...

[Anton Gavrilov]

Well, the corvettes are soooooooo bad and poor, but still building.


The leader has already passed not so little, in fact, there are already doing a technical project for a number of things, and this is the 1 step from the release of working drawings, by which the ship will already be under construction.

So sho, here the Leader is no longer such and fairy tales actually.

But alas, far from iron yet ....

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

Well, the corvettes are soooooooo bad and poor, but still building.

Tota on the Black Sea Fleet 4 corvettes because of the Germans are standing without power plants, they are waiting until we either make it ourselves or the Chinese will sell us under a license ...

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

The leader has already passed not so little, in fact, there are already doing a technical project for a number of things, and this is the 1 step from the release of working drawings, by which the ship will already be under construction.

So sho, here the Leader is no longer such and fairy tales actually.

And then, for the realism of the oil painting, let's remember the age of the RK Moscow, and any of the Atlantes and Orlans ... I will modestly keep silent about the destroyers, although you know that things are no better there ...
The fleet is getting old ... and if the renovation is going on with small ships, then with the ships of the first rank we still have "a horse not lying around" (Nakhimov's modernization does not count).
Sincerely.

[Anton Gavrilov]

Yes, the state of the surface fleet leaves much to be desired far better ... And the prospects are very bleak ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

Yes, the state of the surface fleet leaves much to be desired far better ... And the prospects are very bleak ...

That is why I sharpened my attention on the Leader ... we need these ships-arsenals with Zircons to the bone right now ...

[Anton Gavrilov]

And Nuka, comrades minsuery, clearly and clearly outline to me what I’m wrong about.

Come on. I listen to your arguments.

[Atrix]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

I’m just creepy, and furiously infuriates me when people, TOTALLY NOT DROPING, UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTION, WRITE ANY FUCK!

And it terribly infuriates me when they try to give out repairs in 6 years, for some success. When the USSR launches a new boat almost every year. When, for example, the USA ordered the first Virginia in 1998 already in operation, 12 pieces

[Anton Gavrilov]

The question is, what do I give out repair of Kuzbass for success?

In general, I stated thoughts about completely different things here!

At the expense of Virginia. Well, how did you want it? Their construction was launched a decade and a half ago.

The serial construction of our same 885M then unfolded only 5 years ago.

[Atrix]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

The question is, what do I give out repair of Kuzbass for success?

It doesn’t concern you personally

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

At the expense of Virginia. Well, how did you want it? Their construction was launched a decade and a half ago.

Well, you say that for example it’s not true that in the USA they build boats for the 2-3 of the year. Well, for example, we do not take design developments. And we take the bookmark date 1997 18 years have passed and built 12 submarines, an average of one and a half years out on one submarine, the numbers are stubborn. Builds two shipyards, even if divided, it turns out that one shipyard issues a boat every three years.

[Anton Gavrilov]

The fact is that they are not building an 1 boat at the same time. And at the moment, for example, ok 10. And for the 1 year, 1 from time to time handed over 2 boats.

At each shipyard, approximately half of each series.

1 series 4
2 6
3 8
4 10

Only the 5 series will be fully assembled by the Electric Boat, since NSBC will sculpt SSBNX, which, by the way, will actually begin in 2017 in the latest data.

[Sailor]

Great news, the main thing is that the equipment is really new, and not "sawn"

[Denis Obukhov]

In particular, the Russian Navy plans to accept by 2020 seven nuclear submarines of the Yasen project and eight nuclear submarines of the Borey project. Two diesel-electric submarines of the Lada project, Kronstadt and Velikie Luki, are currently under construction at the Admiralty Shipyards. The delivery of these submarines will take place on time.

[Denis Obukhov]

Zvezda should be able to repair / modernize 3-4 nuclear submarines per year.
Given the composition of the Pacific Fleet's forces, this is enough, 1 repair / modernization in 4 years.
- 4strategy BDRA, Borei
- 4 hunters 971, project 885
- 4 nuclear submarines with CR Pr 949 AM, Pr 885

Two similar groupings should be formed on the Northern Fleet, and Zvezdochka should be ready to repair / modernize 6-8 nuclear submarines per year.

[padded jacket]

In general, it is necessary to revise all the nuclear submarines left over from the USSR, especially the so-called "titanium" submarines, and restore them whenever possible.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: Denis Obukhov

- 4 strategy BDRA,

Like the submarine of project 667 BDRM, everything was modernized. Seisas is modernized and repaired by Pike-B, titanium Condor and Barakuda and Antei.

[Anton Gavrilov]

titanium condor

Kondo stupidly in working condition

There is a project for the modernization of Barracuda, they even started to do it on the main one, but the work is frozen, and when they resume, if at all, resume xs.

[Bort radist]

It's nice that Kuzbass now can not only give coal to the mountain.
I am from Novokuznetsk, as we say, from the southern capital of the Kuznetsk coal basin.

[Heritologist]

If I am not mistaken, according to the name of the ship, there is a tradition that the city or region whose name the ship bears is patronage over it. And also conscripts from this region are sent there to serve.
So we must assume that the Kuzbass nuclear submarine is under the wing of the KO administration.
If there are knowledgeable sailors on the site, it would be interesting if they could consult with them.

[kote119]

yes, usually it is, only conscripts are not serving on boats now, and so the administrations help in one way or another

[na76]

Explain to a layperson why our nuclear submarines have such a big difference between surface and submarine displacement by 1,5 times or more, while the difference between amers, Britons and the French is only 10-20%

[shans2]

to ram underwater more efficiently

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: nae76

Explain to a layperson why our nuclear submarines have such a big difference between surface and submarine displacement by 1,5 times or more, while the difference between amers, Britons and the French is only 10-20%

We have 8 double-hull submarines and torpedo tubes, they have single-hull or one-and-a-half hulls. In addition, the United States has only 4 torpedo tubes in Los Angeles and Virginia.

[lelikas]

Quote: nae76

Explain to a layperson why our nuclear submarines have such a big difference between surface and submarine displacement by 1,5 times or more, while the difference between amers, Britons and the French is only 10-20%

Due to the design of the boat itself - ours have two hulls - strong and light, between them are tanks, cylinders, fittings, and they have only durable - everything is inside it.

[Mountain shooter]

Nice, proven boat. And the repair was delayed. Maybe they hung something extra for her? In her high-caliber TA? I would like to believe that not all of the "surprises" have been spotted yet.

[kapitan92]

Quote: Wiruz

The Schuka-B project was really successful. Eh ... But once such submarines were built in a year and a half

... Submarines of project 971 "Shchuka-B" (NATO designation - "Akula") - a series of Soviet multipurpose nuclear submarines of the third generation, designed according to the same technical specifications as the "titanium" boats of the project 945 "Barracuda", but with steel body. Built in 1983-2004, the Shchuki-B became the main type of multipurpose nuclear submarines in the Russian fleet, replacing the outdated Project 671RTMK Shchuka boats ...
Successful project! The modernization primarily affected the GAS - the detection range increased 3 times, communication facilities, weapons control systems ...

[Bort radist]

Premier League No. 517 "Kuzbass".

The epic with the repair of a similar nuclear submarine “Kuzbass” at the Far East plant “Zvezda” lasts even longer. The contract for its technical condition repair was signed on August 17, 2009 under the number 714/13/27 / KE / 0974-09. The deadline was determined on November 25, 2010, by an additional agreement of February 2011, it was extended until June 01.06.2011, 1. The initial cost of the work was announced at 10 billion XNUMX million rubles.
On this submarine, work was not possible for similar reasons:
- the pre-repair survey of the order was not carried out, therefore, at the time of signing the Contract, the full scope of work was not known to achieve the result,
- in the course of the work on extending the service life of the systems and equipment of order No. 516, a significant amount of additional work was revealed that were not taken into account by the repair list of the order and, accordingly, are not the subject of the concluded state contract, but without which it would be impossible to extend the service life of the ship for 3,5 years, declared by the contract,
- the absence of programs and methods of design organizations for the period of conclusion of the contract for extending the service life of the ship by 3,5 years (previously, the service life was extended by no more than 1 year). So, during the inspection it was revealed that without major overhaul of the propeller shaft, it is impossible to carry out work to restore the technical readiness of the ship and extend the life of systems and equipment! Moreover, the duration of the repair cycle of the propeller shaft repair is at least 9 months.
The study of the availability of additional work, the amount of additional funding and the postponement of the date of submarine delivery was carried out until December 18, 2012, when a new state contract No. Р / 1/2/0723 / ГК / 12-ДГЗ with the amount of financing of 463,955 million rubles was concluded ... The protocol for the coordination of the scope of work was signed on July 19, 2013. The completion date for the new agreement is set until October 31, 2013 (that is, three years later than the first contract, which provided for an extension of the service life by only 3,5 years!). Taking into account the conclusion of a new agreement for additional work, the term of the first agreement was also extended, the cost of repair work on it was increased by 690 million rubles. (1,5 times the original!).

Taken in court cases А40-164659 / 12 and А40-28291 / 13.

[costolom]

I hope my "Great City-Komsomolsk on the Amur" will flourish in the future! On the message, Putin did not speak for us in vain, he just figured to see what we are producing (we can produce and produced in the USSR) and how important our City is, God forbid that everyone understood everything and finally took up our "City of Youth" as we call it, I am not ashamed of "The most industrial city in many industries" in the Khabarovsk Territory .....

[over]

Does anyone know why the courts are not named after Fyodor Ushakov? Not long ago I read about him, not a likely person. Not a single lost battle. And here is Nakhimov, a dangerous name. They say that all ships with his name are drowning because he flooded his fleet ...

[Rambylbafen]

Okay, this one seems to be repaired , and Irkutsk is probably still standing since 2001, or it was recognized as non-repairable who knows?