Military Review

The submarine "Kuzbass" will return to the Pacific Fleet by the end of the year

53
The submarine K-419 "Kuzbass" (project 971U "Pike-B") completed repairs at the Far East plant "Zvezda" and will return to the base of the Pacific Fleet submarines before the end of the year, reports Lenta.ru report.


The submarine "Kuzbass" will return to the Pacific Fleet by the end of the year


“Kuzbass was repaired for quite a long time, from 2009 of the year, formally it was the restoration of technical readiness, but in fact the boat underwent a full-fledged average repair with the replacement of a significant part of equipment with modern analogues,” a source in the defense industry told the publication.

“The nuclear submarine K-419 was laid down in Komsomolsk-on-Amur on July 28, 1991, launched on May 18, 1992 and transferred to December 31, 1992 the fleet. From April 1993 to January 1998 it bore the name "Walrus", subsequently renamed "Kuzbass". One of the most popular submarines of the Pacific Fleet in the 1990s - 2000s, repeatedly performing combat service tasks in various areas of the ocean, ”recalls the online edition.

Boats of the 971 project have an underwater displacement of about 10 thousand tons, reach speeds up to 33 catch and sink to 600 m. Crew - human 73.

As part of the fleet is 11 similar submarines (a total of 14 boats built). Another Nerpa submarine at 2012 was leased to India for 10 years with the new name S-72 Chakra.
Photos used:
www.vietgiaitri.com
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. seti
    seti 21 December 2015 14: 06 New
    12
    Great news. Given the latest developments in a timely manner.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Byshido_dis
          Byshido_dis 21 December 2015 14: 15 New
          -6
          Я тут недавно на ВО читал "Памятку шпиона"... Вы знаете, я не собираюсь играть в ваши игры. Мне все равно на то что вы думаете и врете. А текущий состав ТОФ это не ваше дело, это дело ВМФ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ!
          1. gaura
            gaura 21 December 2015 14: 36 New
            11
            Emotionally, but not reasoned. Compared with the fleets of Japan, China and other Asian republics, our Pacific Fleet is far behind. The rest is your emotions and hatred
            1. Byshido_dis
              Byshido_dis 21 December 2015 14: 40 New
              -18
              Emotionally, but not reasoned. Compared with the fleets of Japan, China and other Asian republics, our Pacific Fleet is far behind. The rest is your emotions and hatred


              Where are your arguments? By the Japanese fleets? As far as I remember, they are forbidden to build large warships. About China is possible, but in terms of quality and efficiency, they lag behind us. And finally ABOUT WHAT OTHER COUNTRIES? What are you saying? Or ashamed?
              1. lelikas
                lelikas 21 December 2015 15: 21 New
                11
                Quote: Byshido_dis
                As far as I remember they are forbidden to build large warships.

                And they, along the way, do not know about it ...
        2. NEXUS
          NEXUS 21 December 2015 15: 50 New
          +7
          Quote: Wiruz
          You can wipe your comments. Modernization is, of course, good, but you can’t get far on it. Look at the current composition of the Pacific Fleet - cry. This is especially true for surface ships.

          Hmm, sadly, but there is some truth in your words. We laid the 7th Borei-A, and Ash trees don’t itch ... Kazan, if, as they promise, will be lowered in the 16th year, it will be fine, and Novosibirsk , Krasnoyarsk and Arkhangelsk God knows when we will see ... with mock-ups of Leaders and Shkvalov we run through exhibitions, but we don’t build, and the fleet is aging. Modernization will add another 15 years to the service of ships built back in the USSR, and then it’s not clear what ... ships of the first rank are not built, and watchdogs are built like US aircraft carriers for 7-10 years.
          We are stagnating with the Ladas. We are modernizing the Varshavyanki again, while we still need Ladas yesterday and in large quantities.
          1. Garris199
            Garris199 21 December 2015 16: 12 New
            +1
            Quote: NEXUS
            Hmm, sadly, but there is some truth in your words. We laid the 7th Borei-A, and Ash trees do not itch to lay.

            Exactly. There are enough strategists, 3 Boreas in the ranks, 3 under construction, 5 667 BDRM in the ranks, there is one typhoon. You can wait a bit with them, but MCAPL (the main striking force of the Navy) is sharply insufficient. Isn't it better to allocate extra power for them?
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 21 December 2015 16: 16 New
              +3
              Quote: Garris199
              Exactly. There are enough strategists, 3 Boreas in the ranks, 3 under construction, 5 667 BDRM in the ranks, there is one typhoon. You can wait a bit with them, but MCAPL (the main striking force of the Navy) is sharply insufficient. Isn't it better to allocate extra power for them?

              So the building of Kazan was moved to the right for a year, that is, until the 17th year ... which means that the other 3 Ash trees were also moved ... it's all sad, damn it
      2. Atrix
        Atrix 21 December 2015 16: 54 New
        +2
        Quote: Byshido_dis
        Who wrote that we forgot about the Pacific Fleet? You can wipe your idle talk !!!

        You are sorry, of course, but boat repairs have been carried out for 6 years ??? And do you consider this a success ??? In the United States during this time, two or three boats will be built from scratch. What are you talking about, for this you need to shoot for such repairs for 6 years.
        full average repair

        Damn if the average repair they have 6 years, then a complete repair what will be 12 years ??? In Soviet times or in China, the entire plant would be put up against the wall and shot for such a repair period.
        1. Terner38
          Terner38 21 December 2015 17: 10 New
          0
          Just the same exactly according to the training manual comments. A couple of days ago, the article was. It’s time for the authorities to inform you that you need to upgrade the troll technology!
    2. cniza
      cniza 21 December 2015 14: 11 New
      +2
      As part of the fleet is 11 similar submarines (a total of 14 boats built). Another Nerpa submarine at 2012 was leased to India for 10 years with the new name S-72 Chakra.


      By grain, by grain, everything is being restored.
      1. kil 31
        kil 31 21 December 2015 14: 22 New
        +1

        Появление уже после окончания "холодной войны" в составе российского флота новых сверхскрытных атомоходов вызвало серьезную озабоченность в США. В 1991 г. этот вопрос был поднят в конгрессе. На обсуждение американских законодателей было вынесено несколько предложений, направленных на то, чтобы исправить в пользу США сложившееся положение. В соответствии с ними предполагалось, в частности:
        - require our country to make public its long-term programs in the field of submarine shipbuilding;
        - establish for the Russian Federation and the United States agreed restrictions on the quantitative composition of multipurpose nuclear submarines;
        - assist Russia in the conversion of shipyards building nuclear submarines to produce non-military products.
        As I understand it, their requirements are not relevant right now. If we do not write off, modernization, repair and commissioning. Stamp the pots at the shipyards yourself.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 21 December 2015 14: 17 New
      +1
      We should try it on Turkomans .. smile


      clickable.
  2. Dangerous
    Dangerous 21 December 2015 14: 06 New
    +6
    Cool submarine! Apparently in the near future it will remain our main hunter for nuclear submarines and ships, since Ash is held back
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 21 December 2015 14: 13 New
      +4
      The Schuka-B project was really successful. Eh ... But once such submarines were built in a year and a half winked
      1. Byshido_dis
        Byshido_dis 21 December 2015 14: 18 New
        -13
        Are you implying that we are not building anything? And what is being built is really bad? Can you still say that Russia has not invented anything new after the USSR?
        1. Dangerous
          Dangerous 21 December 2015 14: 42 New
          +6
          Он не намекает, а говорит, как было, а не как есть. Орланы за 5 лет в состав флота принимали, включая в этот срок закладку, спуск и испытания. Подлодки "обыкновенные" за 1,5 - 2 года, акулы за 3 года. А Ваша истерика на в общем-то рядовой комментарий мало объяснима
          1. Byshido_dis
            Byshido_dis 21 December 2015 14: 50 New
            -7
            В том то и дело что "ЭТО" не рядовой комментарий.
          2. shans2
            shans2 21 December 2015 14: 52 New
            -2
            Warsaw women now rent in 2 years, the last one was built and accepted in 1 year 10 months ... there are no problems with submarines now, there are no problems with the construction of a surface fleet in time, a 15-year-old downtime almost killed the shipyard ... now everything is being restored, the main thing is people , but the problem is already beginning to be overcome.
          3. lelikas
            lelikas 21 December 2015 15: 33 New
            0
            Quote: Dangerous
            Он не намекает, а говорит, как было, а не как есть. Орланы за 5 лет в состав флота принимали, включая в этот срок закладку, спуск и испытания. Подлодки "обыкновенные" за 1,5 - 2 года, акулы за 3 года. А Ваша истерика на в общем-то рядовой комментарий мало объяснима

            Ну , если честно - то только "Калинин" за пять лет , остальные дольше , не говоря у вводе в состав флота, это еще дольше , но принцип верен .
            And if they had not yet arranged such a meaningless variety in projects - so boats would have done faster.
        2. kamski
          kamski 21 December 2015 15: 11 New
          0
          Nothing new, an average boat repair 10 years in the USSR, a boat was built in a year. All that is still developments of the USSR
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Anton Gavrilov
            Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 16: 51 New
            0
            The dry real numbers are that it took 5 ~ 6 years on average to build nuclear submarines in the USSR, in some cases more.
  3. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 21 December 2015 14: 10 New
    +8
    "Nuclear submarine K-419 laid in Komsomolsk-on-Amur on July 28, 1991, launched on May 18, 1992 and December 31, 1992 transferred to the fleet.
    These should be the pace of work, and not from the 9th to the 15th repair!
    1. Byshido_dis
      Byshido_dis 21 December 2015 14: 20 New
      -8
      Под фразой "ремонт" может быть все что угодно, не ужели вы думаете что наше ВС будут на каждом углу кричать о том какую офигенную систему они поставили или какие крутые ракеты теперь будет запускать или какой классный реактор новый поставили??
    2. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 21 December 2015 14: 35 New
      +3
      The nuclear submarine K-419 was laid down in Komsomolsk-on-Amur on July 28, 1991, launched on May 18, 1992, and handed over to the fleet on December 31, 1992.
      .... from such should be the pace of work, and not from the 9th to the 15th - repairs! ...

      .... So the plant was .... Wow, th .... !!!! Where to Severodvinsk .... Unfortunately - was .... request
      1. kote119
        kote119 21 December 2015 14: 56 New
        -1
        in Severodvinsk, the NSR was more powerful, and boats of all classes were built
        1. aleks 62 next
          aleks 62 next 21 December 2015 16: 05 New
          0
          .... in Severodvinsk the NSR was more powerful, and boats of all classes were built ...

          .... It was not more powerful ... In terms of area - yes .... In terms of the number of people working on it among similar ones - no ... At the ZLK, about 50 thousand worked at the best times, in Severodvinsk about 30 thousand. (data for the mid-80s) .... hi
      2. lelikas
        lelikas 21 December 2015 15: 35 New
        0
        Quote: aleks 62 next
        . Where is Severodvinsk ...

        Oh, well ... wink
    3. shans2
      shans2 21 December 2015 14: 55 New
      0
      Now there is no such pace of work anywhere in the world, equipment has become more complicated at times, in the US, submarines have also not been built in 2 years already ....
      1. Anton Gavrilov
        Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 17: 03 New
        +2
        Для справки-"таких" темпов в мире никогда не было и не будет.

        Here, in the photo, what was at the time of laying the Asashai Colorado. Here really it’s impossible to even think and understand how to BUILD THIS IT ALL STARTED NOT FROM THE BOOKING DAY!

        In modern submarines only on the hull, the 1 HOUSING ONLY takes about 2's.

        It is Asashai’s people who most of all love to use this trick for propaganda. They have Virginia’s buildings, now it takes about 5 years on average, the period is gradually decreasing from series to series, but they usually lay them now after more than 3 years of construction, when the boats already in a high degree of readiness.

        The USSR did the same, too! Therefore, it is here and it seems to everyone that SHOWER WHAT TIME IS STAKHANOV!

        I’m just creepy, and furiously infuriates me when people, TOTALLY NOT DROPING, UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTION, WRITE ANY FUCK!

        I don’t climb into posts about tanks, I don’t climb into posts about missiles, armored personnel carriers and other things. I’m there 0, AND I DON’T WRITE ANY Crap IN THIS COMMENT! T

        So be so kind as not to tremble the nerves to us sailors! With us, they tremble without end and edge, taking into account matters with the fleet.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 21 December 2015 17: 10 New
          +1
          Quote: Anton Gavrilov
          So be so kind as not to tremble the nerves to us sailors! With us, they tremble without end and edge, taking into account matters with the fleet.

          And on Ladas it is quiet and dark as on the seabed ... Vashavyanka is a noble submarine, but only a project still created under the Union, but we cannot give birth to Lada ...
          Best regards hi
          1. Anton Gavrilov
            Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 18: 22 New
            +1
            Yes, yes, and yeahhhhhhh, not only problems with Lada .....
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 21 December 2015 18: 24 New
              +1
              Quote: Anton Gavrilov
              Yes, yes, and yeahhhhhhh, not only problems with Lada .....

              Yes, I know ... damn it ... The ash-trees are stopped, and they are like air to us ... and not only the seams with them ... the destroyers and corvettes are scraped, but in the iron there is still zero ...
              1. Anton Gavrilov
                Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 20: 44 New
                +1
                Well, the corvettes are soooooooo bad and poor, but still building.


                The leader has already passed not so little, in fact, there are already doing a technical project for a number of things, and this is the 1 step from the release of working drawings, by which the ship will already be under construction.

                So sho, here the Leader is no longer such and fairy tales actually.

                But alas, far from iron yet ....
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 21 December 2015 21: 16 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Anton Gavrilov
                  Well, the corvettes are soooooooo bad and poor, but still building.

                  Tota on the Black Sea Fleet 4 corvettes because of the Germans are standing without power plants, they are waiting until we either make it ourselves or the Chinese will sell us under a license ... request

                  Quote: Anton Gavrilov
                  The leader has already passed not so little, in fact, there are already doing a technical project for a number of things, and this is the 1 step from the release of working drawings, by which the ship will already be under construction.

                  So sho, here the Leader is no longer such and fairy tales actually.

                  And then, for the realism of the oil painting, let's remember the age of the RK Moscow, and any of the Atlantes and Orlans ... I will modestly keep silent about the destroyers, although you know that things are no better there ...
                  Флот стареет...и если с малыми кораблями худо бедно как то идет обновление,то с кораблями первого ранга у нас пока "конь не валялся"(модернизация Нахимова не в счет).
                  Sincerely. hi
                  1. Anton Gavrilov
                    Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 21: 57 New
                    0
                    Yes, the state of the surface fleet leaves much to be desired far better ... And the prospects are very bleak ...
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 21 December 2015 22: 02 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Anton Gavrilov
                      Yes, the state of the surface fleet leaves much to be desired far better ... And the prospects are very bleak ...

                      That is why I sharpened my attention on the Leader ... we need these ships-arsenals with Zircons to the bone right now ...
            2. Anton Gavrilov
              Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 19: 19 New
              0
              And Nuka, comrades minsuery, clearly and clearly outline to me what I’m wrong about.

              Come on. I listen to your arguments.
        2. Atrix
          Atrix 21 December 2015 18: 25 New
          +1
          Quote: Anton Gavrilov
          I’m just creepy, and furiously infuriates me when people, TOTALLY NOT DROPING, UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTION, WRITE ANY FUCK!

          And it terribly infuriates me when they try to give out repairs in 6 years, for some success. When the USSR launches a new boat almost every year. When, for example, the USA ordered the first Virginia in 1998 already in operation, 12 pieces
          1. Anton Gavrilov
            Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 19: 18 New
            +1
            The question is, what do I give out repair of Kuzbass for success?

            In general, I stated thoughts about completely different things here!

            At the expense of Virginia. Well, how did you want it? Their construction was launched a decade and a half ago.

            The serial construction of our same 885M then unfolded only 5 years ago.
            1. Atrix
              Atrix 21 December 2015 20: 14 New
              0
              Quote: Anton Gavrilov
              The question is, what do I give out repair of Kuzbass for success?

              It doesn’t concern you personally drinks
              Quote: Anton Gavrilov
              At the expense of Virginia. Well, how did you want it? Their construction was launched a decade and a half ago.

              Well, you say that for example it’s not true that in the USA they build boats for the 2-3 of the year. Well, for example, we do not take design developments. And we take the bookmark date 1997 18 years have passed and built 12 submarines, an average of one and a half years out on one submarine, the numbers are stubborn. Builds two shipyards, even if divided, it turns out that one shipyard issues a boat every three years.
              1. Anton Gavrilov
                Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 20: 51 New
                0
                The fact is that they are not building an 1 boat at the same time. And at the moment, for example, ok 10. And for the 1 year, 1 from time to time handed over 2 boats.

                At each shipyard, approximately half of each series.

                1 series 4
                2 6
                3 8
                4 10

                Only the 5 series will be fully assembled by the Electric Boat, since NSBC will sculpt SSBNX, which, by the way, will actually begin in 2017 in the latest data.
  4. Sailor
    Sailor 21 December 2015 14: 12 New
    +4
    Отличная новость,главное чтобы действительно оборудование поставили новое,а не "распилиенное"
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 21 December 2015 14: 14 New
    +1
    В частности, в состав ВМФ России планируется принять до 2020 г. семь АПЛ проекта "Ясень" и восемь АПЛ проекта "Борей".На "Адмиралтейских верфях" строятся сейчас две ДЭПЛ проекта "Лада" - "Кронштадт" и "Великие Луки". Сдача этих подлодок произойдет в установленные сроки.
  6. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 21 December 2015 14: 25 New
    +3
    Zvezda should be able to repair / modernize 3-4 nuclear submarines per year.
    Given the composition of the Pacific Fleet's forces, this is enough, 1 repair / modernization in 4 years.
    - 4strategy BDRA, Borei
    - 4 hunters 971, project 885
    - 4 nuclear submarines with CR Pr 949 AM, Pr 885

    Two similar groupings should be formed on the Northern Fleet, and Zvezdochka should be ready to repair / modernize 6-8 nuclear submarines per year.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 21 December 2015 14: 46 New
      -1
      Вообще надо провести ревизию на всех АПЛ оставшихся от СССР особенно на так называемых "титановых" и восстановитель их по возможности.
    2. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock 21 December 2015 16: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      - 4 strategy BDRA,

      Like the submarine of project 667 BDRM, everything was modernized. Seisas is modernized and repaired by Pike-B, titanium Condor and Barakuda and Antei.
      1. Anton Gavrilov
        Anton Gavrilov 21 December 2015 16: 55 New
        +1
        titanium condor


        Kondo stupidly in working condition

        There is a project for the modernization of Barracuda, they even started to do it on the main one, but the work is frozen, and when they resume, if at all, resume xs.
  7. Bort radist
    Bort radist 21 December 2015 14: 49 New
    +3
    It's nice that Kuzbass now can not only give coal to the mountain.
    I am from Novokuznetsk, as we say, from the southern capital of the Kuznetsk coal basin.
    1. Heritologist
      Heritologist 21 December 2015 15: 08 New
      0
      If I am not mistaken, according to the name of the ship, there is a tradition that the city or region whose name the ship bears is patronage over it. And also conscripts from this region are sent there to serve.
      So we must assume that the Kuzbass nuclear submarine is under the wing of the KO administration.
      If there are knowledgeable sailors on the site, it would be interesting if they could consult with them.
      1. kote119
        kote119 21 December 2015 15: 26 New
        +1
        yes, usually it is, only conscripts are not serving on boats now, and so the administrations help in one way or another
  8. na76
    na76 21 December 2015 14: 54 New
    0
    Explain to a layperson why our nuclear submarines have such a big difference between surface and submarine displacement by 1,5 times or more, while the difference between amers, Britons and the French is only 10-20%
    1. shans2
      shans2 21 December 2015 14: 57 New
      -3
      to ram underwater more efficiently wassat
    2. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock 21 December 2015 15: 22 New
      +2
      Quote: nae76
      Explain to a layperson why our nuclear submarines have such a big difference between surface and submarine displacement by 1,5 times or more, while the difference between amers, Britons and the French is only 10-20%

      We have 8 double-hull submarines and torpedo tubes, they have single-hull or one-and-a-half hulls. In addition, the United States has only 4 torpedo tubes in Los Angeles and Virginia.
    3. lelikas
      lelikas 21 December 2015 15: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: nae76
      Explain to a layperson why our nuclear submarines have such a big difference between surface and submarine displacement by 1,5 times or more, while the difference between amers, Britons and the French is only 10-20%

      Due to the design of the boat itself - ours have two hulls - strong and light, between them are tanks, cylinders, fittings, and they have only durable - everything is inside it.
    4. rudolff
      rudolff 21 December 2015 16: 37 New
      +1
      Если из подводного водоизмещения вычесть надводное и перевести в проценты, получим запас надводной плавучести. Показатель плавучести наших ПЛ всегда был выше, чем у "иностранок". Это не только традиция нашего подводного кораблестроения, но и традиционное требование "адмиралтейства", прописываемое в ТТЗ на новый проект. Обусловленно повышенным требованием к живучести корабля (в том числе с затопленным отсеком) и подводной ледовзломности.
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 21 December 2015 14: 56 New
    0
    Хорошая, проверенная лодка. А в ремонте задержалась. Может, ей что нибудь дополнительное навесили? В ее ТА повышенного калибра? Хотелось бы верить, что еще не все "нежданчики" засветили.
  10. kapitan92
    kapitan92 21 December 2015 15: 24 New
    +5
    Quote: Wiruz
    The Schuka-B project was really successful. Eh ... But once such submarines were built in a year and a half winked
    ... Submarines of project 971 "Shchuka-B" (NATO designation - "Akula") - a series of Soviet multipurpose nuclear submarines of the third generation, designed according to the same technical specifications as the "titanium" boats of the project 945 "Barracuda", but with steel body. Built in 1983-2004, the Shchuki-B became the main type of multipurpose nuclear submarines in the Russian fleet, replacing the outdated Project 671RTMK Shchuka boats ...
    Successful project! The modernization primarily affected the GAS - the detection range increased 3 times, communication facilities, weapons control systems ...
  11. Bort radist
    Bort radist 21 December 2015 15: 25 New
    +1
    Premier League No. 517 "Kuzbass".

    The epic with the repair of a similar nuclear submarine “Kuzbass” at the Far East plant “Zvezda” lasts even longer. The contract for its technical condition repair was signed on August 17, 2009 under the number 714/13/27 / KE / 0974-09. The deadline was determined on November 25, 2010, by an additional agreement of February 2011, it was extended until June 01.06.2011, 1. The initial cost of the work was announced at 10 billion XNUMX million rubles.
    On this submarine, work was not possible for similar reasons:
    - the pre-repair survey of the order was not carried out, therefore, at the time of signing the Contract, the full scope of work was not known to achieve the result,
    - in the course of the work on extending the service life of the systems and equipment of order No. 516, a significant amount of additional work was revealed that were not taken into account by the repair list of the order and, accordingly, are not the subject of the concluded state contract, but without which it would be impossible to extend the service life of the ship for 3,5 years, declared by the contract,
    - the absence of programs and methods of design organizations for the period of conclusion of the contract for extending the service life of the ship by 3,5 years (previously, the service life was extended by no more than 1 year). So, during the inspection it was revealed that without major overhaul of the propeller shaft, it is impossible to carry out work to restore the technical readiness of the ship and extend the life of systems and equipment! Moreover, the duration of the repair cycle of the propeller shaft repair is at least 9 months.
    The study of the availability of additional work, the amount of additional funding and the postponement of the date of submarine delivery was carried out until December 18, 2012, when a new state contract No. Р / 1/2/0723 / ГК / 12-ДГЗ with the amount of financing of 463,955 million rubles was concluded ... The protocol for the coordination of the scope of work was signed on July 19, 2013. The completion date for the new agreement is set until October 31, 2013 (that is, three years later than the first contract, which provided for an extension of the service life by only 3,5 years!). Taking into account the conclusion of a new agreement for additional work, the term of the first agreement was also extended, the cost of repair work on it was increased by 690 million rubles. (1,5 times the original!).

    Taken in court cases А40-164659 / 12 and А40-28291 / 13.
  12. kostolom
    kostolom 21 December 2015 16: 34 New
    0
    Надеюсь мой "Великий Город-Комсомольск На Амуре" будет процветать и в дальнейшем! Путин на послании ни зря за нас говорил, просто прикинул видать что мы производим (можем производить и производили в СССР) и насколько наш Город важен, дай бог что все всё поняли и взялись наконец то за наш "Город Юности" как мы его называем, не постесняюсь "Самый Промышленный Во Многих Отраслях Промышленности ГОРОД" в Хабаровском крае.....
  13. rudolff
    rudolff 21 December 2015 16: 54 New
    +1
    In Komsomolsk-on-Amur, for many years, the building of plant No. 519 pr.971 Irbis has been idle at 60% readiness. Could have been completed for a long time ...
  14. over
    over 21 December 2015 18: 09 New
    0
    Does anyone know why the courts are not named after Fyodor Ushakov? Not long ago I read about him, not a likely person. Not a single lost battle. And here is Nakhimov, a dangerous name. They say that all ships with his name are drowning because he flooded his fleet ...
  15. Rambylbafen
    Rambylbafen 21 December 2015 19: 54 New
    +1
    Okay, this one seems to be repaired lol , and Irkutsk is probably still standing since 2001, or it was recognized as non-repairable who knows? request
  16. rudolff
    rudolff 21 December 2015 21: 16 New
    +1
    Since 2001, he has been at Zvezda DVZ, and in fact has been put out of reserve and in anticipation of an average repair since 1997. So only we know how to repair, there are no more such idiots anywhere.
    "К-132 «Иркутск», который модернизируется на Дальневосточном заводе «Звезда», вернется в состав Тихоокеанского флота в 2019 году, сообщает Интерфакс АВН со ссылкой на источник в кораблестроительной отрасли. «Крейсер «Иркутск» модернизируется на «Звезде» по проекту 949АМ."
    Perhaps the first of this project with Onyx instead of Granite. Unless they change their minds again.