Soviet "Acacia" continue to smash terrorists in Syria

57
ACS 2X3 "Acacia", despite its small size, makes a worthy contribution to the fight against terrorist groups in Syria. In total, they received a little more than 50 units from the USSR, Lev Romanov writes in his article for Messenger of Mordovia.

Soviet "Acacia" continue to smash terrorists in Syria


According to the newspaper, the Syrian army began to receive self-propelled guns from the USSR rather late and in very limited quantities, because at that time “Akatsiyami” actively armed Soviet troops stationed in Eastern Europe and Afghanistan.

The Syrian government did not have funds for the purchase of expensive weapons, so it was necessary to hope only for fraternal assistance from the Soviet Union.

"2С3" Acacia "was put into service in 1971 year. Two years later, NATO intelligence learned of its existence, after which it was given the designation M-1973. For the first time, this car was openly demonstrated only in 1977, November 7, during the parade on Red Square, ”the Herald reminds.

“During the civil war in Syria for a considerable time the combat use of these self-propelled guns was recorded only in the Damascus area. “Acacias” were very often used as assault vehicles - they hit the terrorists with direct fire. One can only imagine what the militants were experiencing when they were fired with shells weighing more than forty kilograms, ”writes Romanov.

Of course, the “locale” is not intended for urban battles, but its appearance in the settlements put considerable psychological pressure on the bandits - they tried to get out of the shelling as soon as possible and for a while stopped resistance.

“Despite the fact that the vehicles were used in street battles, they did not receive additional protection, unless, of course, we consider car tires with sandbags hung on armor,” the author notes.

The weight of the self-propelled unit - 27,5 tons, crew 4 people. Armament - 152-mm howitzer 2А33, firing range - to 17, 4 km, ammunition - 46 shots, rate of fire - up to 4 shots / min. Reservations - up to 30 mm. Engine power - 520 hp, speed - up to 60 km / h, power reserve - up to 500 km.



According to the author, there were no casualties in the SAU park for all these years, but this summer “the first two cars were hit, and because they were used in areas saturated with American anti-tank complexes TOW-2, again for shooting direct aiming.
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    19 December 2015 09: 02
    The Syrian government did not have funds for the purchase of expensive weapons, so it was necessary to hope only for fraternal assistance from the Soviet Union.
    It’s like a kitten in the middle of a cruel Arab world ...
    1. +11
      19 December 2015 09: 06
      Quote: Alexej
      It's like a kitten

      Such a KotoSAU can tear to shreds.
      1. PN
        +17
        19 December 2015 09: 12
        It will tear apart, but why are they driven into the city if their estate is open? There may be a problem with professional spotters and gunners.
        1. +20
          19 December 2015 09: 35
          Quote: PN
          To break will break, but why they are driven into the city

          video from Andrei Filatov (I think no one showed this war better than him Yes Yes )
          a year ago or more request
          Andrey's channel - a lot of interesting
          http://www.youtube.com/user/andre8filatov/videos
          1 video from 6.50 - ACACIA works - but it's better to watch completely - then it’s clearer

          2 videos are also interesting wink
          Anti-aircraft gun against the positions of terrorists

          Well, 3 - The Beauty of Acacia
          1. +6
            19 December 2015 10: 14
            Quote: Dryuya2
            1 video from 6.50 - ACACIA works - but it's better to watch completely - then it’s clearer

            and here is the continuation of the distribution of "flowers"
            1. +8
              19 December 2015 10: 30
              The class, it’s a pity to shoot, last year, every day, as the series watched :)))
              Now "Zvezda" is shooting, but in the standard way: a correspondent, a couple of shots of the Syrians and a shot. ..
              1. +4
                19 December 2015 10: 40
                Quote: Samaritan
                Class, sorry to shoot ceased last year, every day,

                Andrey is not "working" with ANNA NEWS in Donbass now
                sometimes visiting on anti-maidan http://anti-maidan.com/
                answers the questions .
                Quote: Samaritan
                how the series watched :)))

                I think such a video should not just be watched, but studied - who should!
                1. +2
                  19 December 2015 11: 27
                  Quote: Dryuya2
                  Quote: Samaritan
                  Class, sorry to shoot ceased last year, every day,

                  Andrey is not "working" with ANNA NEWS in Donbass now
                  sometimes visiting on anti-maidan http://anti-maidan.com/
                  answers the questions .
                  Quote: Samaritan
                  how the series watched :)))

                  I think such a video should not just be watched, but studied - who should!

                  ... Yes, and young people are useful, otherwise many represent the war on amerskim films, such as "Rambo" ...
                  Regarding Andrei Filatov, thanks, I looked at his answers to questions:
          2. +9
            19 December 2015 14: 14
            I liked the second video very much. Pay attention, between the shots of the anti-aircraft gun at the adjacent territory, civil vehicles pass along the road without any cover. People don't seem to notice the war, in my opinion they don't even get scared. The most surprising thing is that terrorists do not shoot at them either. This is a very strange war, "Wonderful are your deeds, O Lord!"
        2. +5
          19 December 2015 09: 54
          ... most likely ... the savushka is not a tank., I was not trained to shoot on the move, but with closed or direct fire it is ... and the performance characteristics are not very correctly marked, the range is up to 22 km, the active-rocket projectile is up to 33 km ... 1200 m ha direct fire and the accuracy and lethality on a full charge are just awesome ... I continued on 2c5 "Hyacinth" these are more powerful and more precise, but the armor is 50 and the angle of fire is + -15 "of all (for those who understand), so it is a priority for them to work from closed positions ... turning the base in a tense environment is not particularly appropriate, and the commander is constantly overboard and the plate goes down and up for almost a minute, so the efficiency is not up to par ...
        3. +4
          19 December 2015 10: 22
          Quote: PN
          It will tear apart, but why are they driven into the city if their estate is open?

          or maybe because there is no other. nothing to answer
        4. +4
          19 December 2015 11: 07
          It’s been proved a million times that we need STORM assault tanks / self-propelled guns with TANKOVORY armor for assault operations in conditions of stagnation ....

          improvised assault self-propelled guns at the GM-352 GSH with 57 mm S-60 ...
          1. +2
            19 December 2015 13: 26
            ... wow improvisation good
        5. ZKB
          +4
          19 December 2015 11: 27
          because most of the fortifications and strongholds of terrorists in urban buildings. it can be defended with small forces for a long time and effectively, and even go away imperceptibly in the case of a sheer. but after a couple of shots of such a woman, direct fire ... there’s no one left
        6. The comment was deleted.
        7. +2
          21 December 2015 11: 05
          Not at all in this. From hopelessness. There were no armored vehicles for urban battles either. So you have to throw what is in the city blocks.
          In Grozny, too, from what happened, they "wove" different options for the interaction of armored vehicles with the infantry. Tank-tank (tank carousel), tank-shilka, tank-tunguska. No academy teaches that. The best academy is war. There "a bit" is not the same as in classrooms.
        8. 0
          21 December 2015 13: 24
          Probably a problem with tanks, in the Great Patriotic War there were cases and "Katyushas were beaten in a straight line at the tanks." On July 22, 1942, in a battle north of Novocherkassk, Moskvin's division, which had by that time been transferred to the Southern Front and included in the 3rd Rifle Corps, with two volleys direct fire destroyed 11 tanks - 1,1 per installation, while a good result for an anti-tank battalion of 18 guns was considered the defeat of two or three enemy tanks "
      2. +5
        19 December 2015 09: 12
        In fact, even in the Second World War, our troops used guns as part of assault groups in urban battles. And these cannons rolled along the streets "on their hands", and at the signal of a flag they transferred fire from floor to floor following the movement of their infantry. soldier
      3. +2
        19 December 2015 09: 42
        ... et for sure ... served on such a car class !!! good
      4. +2
        19 December 2015 10: 37
        http://www.cris9.armforc.ru/images/1v14_1.jpg
        54 guns - 3 artillery battalions of 18 guns = 1 self-propelled artillery regiment. Together with the guns, a 1B12 automated fire control complex based on the MT-LBU was also supposed to go (SOB machine - 9 pcs., Design bureau - 9 pcs., NSh adn-3 and CD adn - 3 pcs.)
        1. +1
          19 December 2015 13: 25
          ... in our regiment the truth was another 4 division, a jet ... BM-21
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          19 December 2015 14: 11
          Zanoza - Loshkaryov?
        4. The comment was deleted.
  2. +10
    19 December 2015 09: 04
    Whoever said anything during the Soviet Union, designers knew how to make weapons.
    1. +17
      19 December 2015 09: 11
      Quote: ImperialKolorad
      Whoever said anything during the Soviet Union, designers knew how to make weapons.

      We were able to do it now too ... and not only weapons!
      1. +2
        19 December 2015 12: 04
        I liked the train from air defense missiles
  3. +9
    19 December 2015 09: 04
    The words of an officer of the Foreign Legion of France. "The Kalashnikov assault rifle is a Stone Age technology. But it will not fail in the harshest conditions." Russian weapons, according to Iraqi soldiers, are reliable and unpretentious and perform the same tasks as the fancy American ones, but just as effectively. You can be proud of our designers and gunsmiths ... hi
    1. +6
      19 December 2015 09: 24
      Kalashnikov assault rifle on technology - stone age

      Manufacturing technology is really economical. So all the gunsmiths of the world strive for this - in order to be cheap, but reliable and of high quality. Interestingly, then, not the Stone Age?
      1. +5
        19 December 2015 09: 32
        Probably the M-16, on which it is necessary to pull on the prez and clean it until you lose feeling after each use, and they have such a backlash that all the dirt is at home.
        1. +3
          19 December 2015 12: 58
          Shot from her. Accuracy is perhaps a little better, although from AK all exercises for motorized rifles performed only excellently. But our AK is more reliable, and therefore does not have a rammer, like the M-16.
      2. +6
        19 December 2015 09: 45
        This "stone age" is a design and technological masterpiece. The cumulative combination of its performance is not achievable. Only the club is more reliable, and the combat effectiveness is not much inferior to the most modern counterparts.
      3. +2
        19 December 2015 09: 57
        ... Westerners, justifying concern for security and introducing unknown new technologies to anyone else, are simply looking for a reason to get into the taxpayer’s pocket ...
    2. +6
      19 December 2015 09: 46
      I will stand up for AK - let this officer tell the Papuans and his soldiers about production technologies
      1. +1
        19 December 2015 10: 14
        ... technology as such few people are interested in the main thing, the final product and its performance
    3. +3
      19 December 2015 09: 46
      I will stand up for AK - let this officer tell the Papuans and his soldiers about production technologies
      1. 0
        19 December 2015 11: 47
        Actually, this is AK praise. Compared to everything else. Read and pull out only the first part of the sentence is not worth it.hi
    4. +3
      19 December 2015 09: 56
      ... everything ingenious is simple good
    5. -4
      19 December 2015 22: 40
      According to the officer of the Foreign Legion ... Quilted jacket !!! What is such a "foreign legion" in comparison with the authority of the Kalashnikov assault rifle ??? You, son, filter, ts. "Bazaar" and watch the shooting of the 60s, when in Vietnam, without any prompts from your "foreign legion", gentlemen from the United States threw out the M16 and took the AK 47 in their hands, which shoots anytime, anywhere.
      "YOU CAN BE Proud of OUR DESIGNERS AND WEAPONS" ...
      Is the temperature normal? Parents are not crazy?
      Son. What class are you in?
      1. +2
        20 December 2015 06: 07
        Rudeness on the network is the lot of trolls. Read off-diagonally. You are not inadvertently Ukrainian. Since only those obscenities respond to objections. For reference: Place of service of KTPO, 1986-88. Motomgroup, full-time position - machine gunner. So I am familiar with AK and PC. hi
    6. +1
      20 December 2015 03: 56
      There is nothing of stone in AK. Smudak, that officer.

      There is a video from the Americans on YouTube. There 47 a bit modernized. The barrel is better, the bolt group cockes the trigger smoother.

      Queues at targets are scattered and singing differambs.
  4. +2
    19 December 2015 09: 06
    Self-propelled guns are gradually gaining more and more respect for themselves in view of both the high efficiency of the application and the real shooting results.
  5. +6
    19 December 2015 09: 06
    T-54/55, T-72, D-30, 2C3 "Acacia" ... Everything is Soviet-made, trouble-free and not killed.
    For a long time in the world, many will cling to the weapon that remains of the Great Power like a straw. For many "democratizers" all this will rise across the throat more than once.
    1. +4
      19 December 2015 10: 42
      And now they produce, just a sight for sore eyes:
  6. +8
    19 December 2015 09: 10
    Well, how can the Syrians explain that self-propelled guns are not tanks! Although similar. Judging by the angle of inclination of the trunks of guns of all types, which are shown in the video from the battlefields, the Syrian army uses mainly direct fire. Well this is wrong. Forgotten how to prepare data, adjust the fire ...
    Therefore, excellent self-propelled guns drive instead of tanks.
    1. +8
      19 December 2015 10: 02
      ... to them the special bombardiers of graduates of artillery schools of the Soviet era and the same crews of SOVIET training, the enemy of grief would have grabbed a full scoop ...

      dogs: I’m not at all detracting from the ability and training of specialists in the present, but apparently I’m somewhere somewhere deep down in my soul hi
    2. +6
      19 December 2015 11: 02
      I watched all the videos on Anka from Jobar, they beat them with direct fire both over the heads of the flat and with the closed ones they hit the bull's-eye, so the Syrians work fine there, all according to the circumstances. Another thing is that there are few equipment and they ride from site to site to support one or another unit.
    3. +6
      19 December 2015 11: 22
      This sau is designed for a completely different war. Hedgehog it is clear that the artel is better to use from closed positions, etc. But the war of the case in Syria, with the enormous concentration of the population on the lived fives and in general the civil war, are making adjustments ... SAA officers were just graduating from Soviet and Russian army universities, and they know how to use them.
      1. +3
        19 December 2015 13: 37
        ... well, then it is better to use "Carnations" ... and maneuverability and lethality are at the level ... although 152 and 152 in Africa, and even OF ... damn it, some cannibalistic tendencies appear in old age recourse
  7. +2
    19 December 2015 09: 13
    God forbid to taste the barmaleam sweet piece from the Coalition
  8. +12
    19 December 2015 09: 19
    Ah, something was drawn to the lyrics in the morning))) White acacia clusters are fragrant.
    The night away drove us crazy.
    1. +6
      19 December 2015 10: 04
      ... the most impressive thing is the names of Russian military equipment - acacia, cloves, hyacinth, peony ... mellowing, relaxing in the summer garden and nothing more .. romance and lyrics feel
  9. +6
    19 December 2015 09: 27
    As far as Soviet (Russian) weapons are concerned, so much has been agreed that it is not possible to wedge themselves. Our weapons have always been distinguished by simplicity, reliability, not whimsical service and, of course, combat characteristics.
  10. +7
    19 December 2015 09: 39
    During a mushroom hunt, wandered to a famous training ground near St. Petersburg, and there self-propelled guns fired? He was almost next to the installation and when fired, he realized what self-propelled guns were?
    Three-dimensional world curled up to one-dimensional!
  11. +4
    19 December 2015 09: 42
    At one time, a lot of ingenious developments were created in our country, this is one of them. A lot depends on the ammunition itself. Apparently, Russia helps with them. It is very good that the old technique finds such effective use.
  12. +3
    19 December 2015 09: 54
    The use of self-propelled guns in urban battles has several reasons in my opinion: the lack of tanks plus the power of ammunition. Nezrya was considered that the caliber 152-155 is the most universal at the moment. And as an assault in our WWII and 200-mm mortars on tracks used with great success))).
  13. -4
    19 December 2015 10: 12
    Quote: PN
    It will tear apart, but why are they driven into the city if their estate is open? There may be a problem with professional spotters and gunners.

    It has long been noted that the gunners of the Syrian army, to put it mildly, are not very ...
  14. +6
    19 December 2015 10: 21
    One water in the news lately. Obvious things grind day after day under different formulations.
    All of you would like to shout and say what great news, there would be more of them, so get "water"
    1. ICT
      +2
      19 December 2015 11: 09
      the first two cars were hit

      ............
      1. 0
        21 December 2015 23: 38
        Apparently it's not destiny to hide the equipment behind the construction ... let them watch the film "In War as in War"
  15. +6
    19 December 2015 17: 25
    From the story of an Austrian about military service. They dug a hole at the shooting range, filled it with water, made good mud. The officer in front of the platoon did not talk a lot about Russian weapons and decided to show how it works. Threw AKM, PPSh and M-16 into the mud. 15 minutes after the general briefing, I shot the entire AKM and PPSh store at the target. The American M-16 jammed after 2-3 shots and did not come to her senses, although he very much fiddled with her and cursed. He looked at us and said: "You've seen everything. Draw your conclusions."
  16. 0
    20 December 2015 21: 23
    What would the best aces of the USSR answer!
  17. 0
    21 December 2015 13: 34
    Does the shell really weigh 40kg? Or is it along with a sleeve and a charge?