American intelligence celebrates "new stage" in the development of the Russian fleet

The Russian fleet is currently under renovation and in 15 years it will become a new naval fleet 21st Century, says the latest report by the US Navy Intelligence Agency, which cites National Interest.

“The Russian military has now begun to reorganize the structure of the personnel of the Navy in order to most closely meet the requirements of modern warfare. On the whole, Russia is making great strides in building a fleet of the twenty-first century capable of providing multi-level national defense, impressive, albeit limited capabilities in the transfer of troops and military equipment, as well as a professional crew. In a sense, (the Russian Navy) will pose an even greater threat than during the days of the Soviet Union ",

quotes a report RIA News.

The authors of the report noted the creation of a "new atomic destroyer" Leader ", designed with a nuclear power plant in accordance with the modified technical project." At first, “it was planned to use a gas turbine power plant, but this technology has remained since Soviet times and is outdated,” the document explains. The ship will combine "the properties of a destroyer and a cruiser, ready for attacks from air and land, and will also have anti-missile defense capabilities," the authors note.

Photo layout destroyer "Leader"

The report also draws attention to the creation of a new class of multifunctional submarines that "will fulfill the task of ensuring the combat sustainability of submarines" Yuri Dolgoruky "and solve other tasks." This was announced in 2006 by the head of the department for ordering and supplying ships and military equipment of the Ministry of Defense Anatoly Shlemov.

Comments

[oleg-gr]

Congress intimidation began. They will soon recall the lack of funding. Another justification: the military budget needs to be increased.

[lukewarm]

I agree completely. Therefore, do not flatter yourself, they say, even the enemies appreciated.

[Bennert]

The authors of the report noted the creation of "a new nuclear destroyer" Leader ", designed with a nuclear power plant in accordance with the changed terms of reference."

I have the same leader at home on a shelf
"Creation" is loudly said, first, at least put on the slipway the first mortgage section of the keel

the report draws attention to the creation of a new class of multi-functional nuclear submarines

Of the entire "new class", only Severodvinsk was built, the commissioning of the second nuclear submarine (which has been under construction since 2009) was postponed from 2017 to 2018, the third - when the cancer whistles on the mountain

[sa-zz]

Quote: BENNERT

Of the entire "new class", only Severodvinsk was built, the commissioning of the second nuclear submarine (which has been under construction since 2009) was postponed from 2017 to 2018, the third - when the cancer whistles on the mountain

In the photo handsome, already breathtaking. Unfortunately, I do not have such a layout.
Not everything is lost. We wish seven feet under the keel (as the sailors say).

[lelikas]

Quote: sa-zz

In the photo handsome, already breathtaking. Unfortunately, I do not have such a layout.
Not everything is lost. We wish seven feet under the keel (as the sailors say).

So yes, but the model is a secret fan of the Egyptian pyramids - another explanation for the madness on the superstructure - simply does not exist. The radar canvases could be placed on the superstructure itself, like on the Berks, okay, they decided to raise them higher - they built a pyramid and raised them, but why two more, and with a radar on top ?? Plus, there are radars on the foremast and on the sides, under the wings of the bridge - a hint that we have not finished the Aegis-type BIUS yet.
If it were possible - Bennert put a hundred pluses.

[sa-zz]

Quote: lelikas

Quote: sa-zz
In the photo handsome, already breathtaking. Unfortunately, I do not have such a layout.
Not everything is lost. We wish seven feet under the keel (as the sailors say).

So yes, but the model is a secret fan of the Egyptian pyramids - another explanation for the madness on the superstructure - simply does not exist. The radar canvases could be placed on the superstructure itself, like on the Berks, okay, they decided to raise them higher - they built a pyramid and raised them, but why two more, and with a radar on top ?? Plus, there are radars on the foremast and on the sides, under the wings of the bridge - a hint that we have not finished the Aegis-type BIUS yet.

With meager knowledge in this area, I can assume that the shape of the superstructures and sides is an element of reducing visibility from satellites and radars. And if there is also a special coating, it is likely that "stealth" technology will be implemented.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: sa-zz

the shape of add-ons and sides is an element of reducing visibility from satellites

The wake track should be removed from the satellites and the deck area should be minimized, and not sawed pyramids.

[cherkas.oe]

Quote: lelikas

- There is simply no other explanation for the insanity on the add-on.

Not from a good life such add-ons, at least cover them with contours, at least do not close them, they will specifically flash.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: cherkas.oe

Not from a good life such add-ons,

It's all from the fervor of the mind!
Pay attention to the row of windows (square windows) above the running post. This is the FKP - that is, the flagship KP along the way, in order to admire the sea from a height, so to speak.
Neither the Ticonderoga, nor Burke, allow such luxury for their flagships. AVU - so there the island is very small in comparison with the size of the airfield.
So you think: and in the 21st century that TVs will run out, and everything will certainly need to be surveyed with your (and) own (and) "bulging naval eye"?
The Dragon (type 45) has a running post, but FKP is not above it. He is not on Charles, Nimitz ... But on our 1143 (3,5) - he is.
Apparently this is such a tribute to tradition ... "I sit high, I look far away" - which is understandable even for a hedgehog!

[lelikas]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

"I sit high, I look far away" - which is understandable even for a hedgehog!

This is so that the Turkish seiner does not fit on six hundred meters !

[Mister22408]

Maybe losers in secret can not take another project and tear ...

[vex]

The central part is a spilled robot-snowman.) There are not enough carrots on his nose, but maybe it was moved to a lower place?

[novobranets]

Quote: vex

The carrots on his nose aren’t enough, but maybe they moved her much lower?

The hare is jumping through the forest. Hungry, did not eat for three days. Suddenly he sees a snowman standing. Only a joker stuck a carrot into a snowman, not in the upper ball, but in the lowest one. The hare sat in front of the snowman and thought. Then the snowman asks him: - Are you, oblique, disdain or something?

[Bad_gr]

Quote: sa-zz

In the photo handsome, already breathtaking.

But this model of which ship, who will tell?

[Boa kaa]

Quote: sa-zz

We wish seven feet under the keel (as the sailors say).

They say something like this ... That's just what the SHIP wants when launching, and not the LAYOUT on the table ...
(Uhhh! My tin can be ...
Oh her in the swamp
I live like a toadstool
And I fly, and I fly, and I fly
HUNTING!)

[Dewa1s]

In the photo a freak, made in a drunken stupor.
It looks even worse than an American iron.

[maks-101]

The main thing in this article is that the Americans greatly underestimate the potential of RUSSIA.
Russia can and a lot can do what America cannot. They think there only with money and not very soberly, and we are drunk, not washed and not democratic. Russia does not obey them (for example, we Indians are navels)

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: maks-xnumx

The main thing in this article is that the Americans greatly underestimate the potential of RUSSIA.
Russia can and a lot can do what America cannot. They think there only with money and not very soberly, and we are drunk, not washed and not democratic. Russia does not obey them (for example, we Indians are navels)

At the moment, they overestimate it, for the reasons indicated, in the comments above. About the Leader in general, except that development is underway, nothing is known. We still cannot pass frigate 22350. This leader can build another 10 years. 3 Borea and 1 Ash in our next few years. Then they will be commissioned, but it is clear that piece by piece. With surface ships, generally a pipe. Engines are only going to be manufactured by 2018, and what will happen at the output is still unknown.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: Stirbjorn

. 3 Borea and 1 Ash in our next few years. Then they will be commissioned, but it is clear that piece by piece. With surface ships, generally a pipe. Engines are only going to be manufactured by 2018, and what will happen at the output is still unknown.

But diesel submarines are good. There are already 2 submarines on the Black Sea, there will be only 7 (6 Varshavyanka and 1 project Halibut Alrosa).

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Lt. air force reserve

But diesel submarines are good.

Bye - go.
But this is the last 3rd generation. Now everyone is switching to NPL (Dolphins, 212/214, A-19, Scorpienas, etc.)
But our Kalina ... until brought to condition. But judging by the silence on the air, it’s not very ...
Amy are also interested in looking at this direction in the construction of the submarine fleet. An example is Swedish Gotland.
In any case, the most interesting is ahead.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

But our Kalina ... until brought to condition.

It seems that there’s not even a finished Kalina project yet. It is unlikely that the first submarine will descend from the slipway before 2018-2020, and Kalina is also called the 5th generation submarine.
Frets are currently under construction (2nd ones are under construction + 6 submarines are planned for construction).

[larand]

Quote: maks-xnumx

The main thing in this article is that the Americans greatly underestimate the potential of RUSSIA.
Russia can and a lot can do what America cannot. They think there only with money and not soberly ...

Oh, that the "Chinese brothers" after the departure of Medvedev, in their main newspaper gave an analysis that the Russian Federation is at a strategic dead end. The industry is said to be de-industrialized, agriculture is in decline. Who is right - "partners" or "brothers"? Maybe Medvedev said something wrong there?

[Altona]

Quote: larand

Oh, that the "Chinese brothers" after the departure of Medvedev, in their main newspaper gave an analysis that the Russian Federation is at a strategic dead end. The industry is said to be de-industrialized, agriculture is in decline. Who is right - "partners" or "brothers"? Maybe Medvedev said something wrong there?

---------------------
The truth is right in the middle. Some enterprises have survived, some have been completely lost, some have been rebuilt on a new technological base — laser cutting, precision casting, CNC machining. But Russia also has not the same opportunities as the USSR. Not even in terms of money, but personnel and research centers were, for example, in Ukraine. As well as the production base and more ...

[Pirogov]

Correctly the Chinese write! What is the need after the Olympics, immediately the World Cup to hold football there and industry,

[Bennert]

Quote: maks-xnumx

Russia can and a lot can do what America cannot. They think there only with money and not soberly, and we are drunk, not washed and not democratic. Russia does not obey them

Eka shook you

[Atrix]

Quote: maks-xnumx

The main thing in this article is that the Americans greatly underestimate the potential of RUSSIA.

What are they underestimating ??? There are developments that went massively into the army, I'm not talking about 5-10 pieces, but in series as it was in the USSR.

Quote: maks-xnumx

Russia can and a lot can do what America cannot.

And America can that Russia will never be able and what ???

Quote: maks-xnumx

They think there only with money and not soberly, and we are drunk, not washed and not democratic. Russia does not obey them (for example, we Indians are navels)

I will disappoint you that Russia thinks just the same way with money, and maybe even more than America.

[Dewa1s]

Serially, as it was in the USSR - this is when they rivet 2-3 tanks a day for 20 years and then leave this whole thing to rot in the open?
Thank you, we do not need such seriality.

[Kyrgyz]

Quote: maks-xnumx

The main thing in this article is that the Americans greatly underestimate the potential of RUSSIA.
Russia can and a lot can do what America cannot.

Just not at sea, our fleet is incomparably weaker

[Boa kaa]

Quote: maks-xnumx

we are drunk, not washed and not democratic Russia do not obey them (for example, we Indians they are navels)

Oh how! Cheered, however!
But let's do it in order.
1. Drunk, unwashed - advice: get drunk and go to the bathhouse! - let go. Fresh thoughts and fresh thoughts will come!
2. Not democratic ... Yes, Russia is 1000 times more democratic than the USA! We elect the President and the highest bodies of state power by direct voting ... A * exceptional * are so wretched that they instruct the so-called "electors" to do this for themselves. They are bought like radishes by those who have more money.
3. "We are Indians" - well, then everything is clear!
Only me - RUSSIAN! They will die at the appointed time by the Almighty. And the Sioux tribe - fiery ethnographic greetings!
4. "They are navels" (?????) And why would they suddenly? After all, they always scream about "ass!" Maybe you messed something up?
PS.
This, of course, is all banter. But, at least occasionally, you need to think, even on Fridays, coming home from the garage!

[Mister22408]

p.3 Set off! Sioux - which are lost (and from the good of the elder) in the rangers are added ... But you need to have an ax for firewood.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: unwillingly

Therefore, do not flatter yourself, they say, even the enemies appreciated.

Yeah ... Money, power, personnel, cooperation, will and determination ... Finally, approved projects of "conquerors of the sea" ...
Well, who would doubt it !!!
Our "huge plans" are tied to 2020, and the Americans, apparently more realistically, believe that

Russian fleet ... in 15 years it will become the new navy of the 21st century,

that is, by 2030.
Apparently they believe that 70% of new ships can be achieved only by putting the old ones under the knife, not modernizing them, as we are doing now, but exclusively at the expense of new buildings ...
Vaughn and the photo of AEM "Leader" were given as an example ...
Or maybe they found out a terrible military secret that the Malchish-Kibalchish did not tell the bourgeois !?
And our shipbuilding industry will magically lift the surface fleet out of the "backwater"?
Why am I writing this? - "Much knowledge - many sorrows"

[Skifotavr]

Quote: unwillingly

I agree completely. Therefore, do not flatter yourself, they say, even the enemies appreciated.

Stalin said in such cases: "If the enemy praises us, then we have something to strive for."

[Alexey-74]

It is obvious. Although NATO members have respected the Russian fleet again, many have even stopped calling our fleet "rusty and rotten", the remnant of the Soviet Navy .... wait 15-20 years, let's return to this topic ..... the Russian Navy will be the strongest, even if will be outnumbered.

[Pirogov]

Well, you're an optimistic brother.

[APASUS]

Quote: oleg-gr

Congress intimidation began. They will soon recall the lack of funding. Another justification: the military budget needs to be increased.

The Americans are so predictable, I wonder what they are now writing about how America will respond to the new Russian missile "Caliber" and X-101 ??? There probably all the regiments are crammed with horror stories about these missiles with the demand to immediately take measures to overcome the American backlog !!

[Sid.74]

Quote: APASUS

I wonder what they are now writing about how America will respond to the new Russian missile "Caliber" and X-101 ???

What, what they write: Obama la la la la ....

[Atrix]

Quote: APASUS

new Russian missile "Caliber" and X-101

And what is so special about them ??? How are they superior to Tomahawk Block IV or AGM-158B JASSM-ER ???

[Sid.74]

Quote: Atrix

How are they superior to Tomahawk Block IV or AGM-158B JASSM-ER ???

The fact that the X-101 flies four and a half thousand kilometers.
AGM-158B JASSM-ER range 980 km, and Tomahawk Block IV approximately 2 thousands.
Minor difference .. true.

[Skifotavr]

Quote: Sid.74

Quote: Atrix

How are they superior to Tomahawk Block IV or AGM-158B JASSM-ER ???

The fact that the X-101 flies four and a half thousand kilometers.
AGM-158B JASSM-ER range 980 km, and Tomahawk Block IV approximately 2 thousands.
Minor difference .. true.

Non-nuclear X-101 flies for 5000 km, and nuclear X-102 for 5500 km. It is only a pity that a completely extendable engine increases radar visibility.

[APASUS]

Quote: Atrix

Quote: APASUS

new Russian missile "Caliber" and X-101

And what is so special about them ??? How are they superior to Tomahawk Block IV or AGM-158B JASSM-ER ???

Under the INF Treaty, we with the United States destroyed all ground-based missiles, and the Americans remained sea and air based. And in terms of performance characteristics they really surpass the American ones, but this is not the case.

[Mister22408]

But what is the fear, given a fixed number of UBIs in the country? Taking into account that the mass models do not coincide with the center of gravity for br and cr? Lead to cr - "... nya" is complete ...

[Gormenghast]

This is a whole program; Navy - scare; Air Force - scare; EW means - scare; re-equipment of strategic missile forces - scare; they pulled out EMI weapons, hypersonic devices (which the United States would threaten tomorrow), anti-satellite weapons - as if they themselves weren’t doing anything like that.

Congress tends to curb appetites; how to do without intimidation.

[Mister22408]

Yes, there at the top hangs out in orbit sometimes an enemy "X- .." with a filling, the half-life of which does not concern only cockroaches and rats.

[Warrior of Russia]

I agree, the intimidation of members of Congress to increase appropriations for the US Armed Forces.

[Denis Obukhov]

The article is undoubtedly good, it is always nice when you are praised, but the capabilities of the Russian Navy are very far from the Soviet Navy, now of course the weapons that were outdated 20-30 years ago, but at that time it was one of the best in the world, and even now ours The Navy uses mainly the backlog of that time, in terms of the total number of ships, ships of rank 1-2, aircraft-carrying cruisers, etc. we are far behind the USSR. And the Leader project is still only on paper, and all plans are after 2020, so there is no need to talk about its construction and series, especially considering the situation in the economy. The only thing we are inferior in is in submarines, and as for ships of large displacement, we are seriously lagging behind even China, and there is nothing to say about the United States. The article, like the report of the Marine Intelligence Directorate, has one goal: to knock out money from Congress for the fleet, so there is no need to harbor illusions about the recognition of our fleet

[Denis Obukhov]

The future of the Navy is autonomy and stealth combined with destructive power. The age of aircraft carriers is drawing to a close. The ideal of the 21st century at sea is a silent submarine cruiser with missile weapons and an immersion depth of up to 5000 meters, with autonomy up to 60 days and an underwater range of 4000 nautical miles.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Denis Obukhov

silent submarine cruiser with missile weapons and an immersion depth of up to 5000 meters,

Sorry, not a single diver can withstand such a depth, not like a submarine - drones if only

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Denis Obukhov

The future of the Navy ...

There is no prophet in his Fatherland! (C)
1. But the Amy (lawmakers of aircraft carrier fashion) that the age of AVU is coming to an end - and they don’t know ... The poor people are riveting and riveting their super-aircraft carriers!
2. The ideal of you, dear, well, looks very much like a bathyscaphe. Losharik is essentially also an articulated bathyscaphe.
And now, attention, the question is: inside the weapon, based on the pressure per square centimeter of the carrier’s body, it’s not possible to place it (500 mm thick body, who needs it, what for!); Friends at 5000m depth (?) Well, who can handle such a press! So what kind of * ideal * is this you get !?
3. Autonomy up to 60 days? Why not 30 or 20? The milestone of 120 days for atomic carriers is long gone. And it is determined only by the reserves of provisions and the psychological aspects of l / s (crew).
4. 4000 nautical miles - no doubt a lot! But what to do with underwater cruisers that make round the world without surfacing?
Thus, your TTZ parameters for the development of the ship of the future are not accepted!
Best regards,

[Sirs]

No need la la !!! The people are smart there! By the way, you gave a debt7

[Mih]

the budget needs to be increased.

But how to survive? Onizh, copper helmets, will go around the world.

[kote119]

unfortunately, the Leader only in the drawings and in the mock-ups is executed, and when it will be in the iron is not clear.

[Good_Taxist]

Unfortunately, the Leader is only in the drawings and layouts, and when it will be in the iron is not clear.

No regrets - everything has its time .....

[Performance]

I'd love it to become a reality. We have the most beautiful and truly formidable aircraft. And we need beautiful, and in the sense of perfection, large ships, nevertheless it is very symbolic, and as it turned out there is a need, it is necessary to project power, it is useful. And when it is beautiful and powerful - doubly useful.

[Izotovp]

Something about the Leader’s superstructure is very high
Interestingly, and transport submarines in the interests of the Navy considered?

[kote119]

considered, it came to the design stage (50-60 years), but then the views changed. And so were the projects of landing, transport and landing submarines.

[Izotovp]

Thank you, sorry for the little information.

[spravochnik]

Why not enough, very much on the Internet and in print media. Look and find.

[Extraneous]

It seems to me that in this add-on there are observation and fire control posts, traditionally sent in the Russian Navy closer to the top. Plus all sorts of electronic countermeasures systems. Just on our modern ships, all this is open to all winds and detection radars, and this project is designed with an emphasis on reducing the number of reflective surfaces and different reflection angles, which reduces the possibility of radar detection.

[Izotovp]

I understand that everything was removed there, but I’m not even talking about the center of gravity, but about the aerodynamics of this pagoda. Was it blown for wind load? Still, the big burdock of the radar is a grill, and here is a hull system.

[Extraneous]

This configuration in the sense of aerodynamics is much more practical than sticking out in all directions antenna arrays and tower guidance posts.

[uge.garik]

... and about high latitudes, do not forget about icing ...

[spravochnik]

Calm down, this is a project of the Krylov Institute, which has never been involved in real design. The Northern Design Bureau is engaged in real design, and its design will be very different from the one presented.

[Same lech]

The Russian fleet is currently in the process of being renewed and in 15 years it will become the 21 century's new navy, according to the latest report of the US Navy Intelligence Agency, which National Interest reports.

I want to believe in it (and it’s always nice to read an assessment of our potential enemy), but we’ll be better realistic ... where to get money for the construction of technologically advanced ships ... from what sources will it all be financed?

[Extraneous]

It seems to me - after Putin we will have a leader of a dictatorial type who will have to rebuild the entire system of governing the country. Putin is the preparatory phase. That is why the security forces are so calmly now treating various liberal and extremist manifestations in the country, although they are slowly tightening the screws. We will need a reason to tighten power and for this we will wait for attempts to organize a new coup in the country.
There is money. All countries, if you notice, are trying to rearm by the 20th year. We are waiting for the war.

[DobryAAH]

Tough and ingenious, if the predictions of the Orthodox saints and elders are fulfilled. Everyone else will be afraid.

[venaya]

The Russian military has now begun reorganizing the structure of the Navy personnel to most closely meet the requirements of modern warfare.

Though from this end we will try to get leadership. This, of course, is not enough, but at least one has to start with something.

[OMEDB]

Of course, I'm proud of our fleet, but it seems to me that we are still far away ... 10 years are not enough! We would have 20 such "Leaders" (at least)!

[veksha50]

Quote: OMEDB

we are still far away ... that way 10 years are not enough! Such "Leaders" we would have 20 things (least)!

With such appetites, 30 years is not enough ... We need money, production facilities, competent, qualified shipbuilding personnel, personnel ...

PS Moscow requires a major overhaul and modernization, and soon Peter will also get in line ... If there were at least a couple of such Leaders - even holes could be plugged ... And 5-6 is generally a beauty ...

And you talked about twenty ... At present-it's just utopia ....

[OMEDB]

Well this is me, dream They say dreams come true

[NEXUS]

Quote: OMEDB

Photo layout destroyer "Leader"

In the photo is not the Leader, but the export version with a gas turbine power plant destroyer Shkval ..
Here is the destroyer Leader:

[Simple]

Quote: NEXUS

Here is the destroyer Leader:

This is a model one of the options project destroyer Ave. 21956 Northern Design Bureau 2008 development IMDS-2009, St. Petersburg, July 2009

Quote: NEXUS

r, and the export version with a gas turbine power plant destroyer Shkval ..

Yes. The promising destroyer “Flurry” of the 23560 project at IMDS-2015

On the other hand:
Image of a promising destroyer pr. 23560E from a poster at the "Army-2015" exhibition, Moscow, June 17.06.2015, XNUMX.

==================
R&D "Leader" - a project of a promising destroyer of the ocean zone.
In my opinion it is about the same thing.

[KaPToC]

Quote: OMEDB

We would have 20 such "Leaders" (at least)!

The century of large surface warships has long passed, for the money you can build a colony on the moon and fly away what for.

[Dewa1s]

why not 200? Why not 2000? And it’s better to have two millenes, so that all seven seas in destroyers. Then there would be a blunder ...

[Simon]

That the American intelligence jaw dropped and his eyes hatched in surprise. Let the back of your head scratch It's only the beginning.

[PatriotKZ]

The destroyer "Leader" is good.

[NEXUS]

Quote: PatriotKZ

The destroyer "Leader" is good.

In fact, this ship is difficult to attribute to the class of destroyers, since the displacement is 15-18 thousand tons and the nuclear power plant is more likely to classify it as a class of cruisers (ARC)

[Extraneous]

"Leader" is traditionally a separate class of ships. Intermediate between destroyers and cruisers. As a rule, there are only a few ships of this class. Should be used as flagships for destroyer formations.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Stranger

"Leader" is traditionally a separate class of ships. Intermediate between destroyers and cruisers. As a rule, there are only a few ships of this class. Should be used as flagships for destroyer formations.

No ... it's an arsenal ship by and large. And it’s closer to the class of nuclear missile cruisers.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: NEXUS

No ... it's an arsenal ship by and large. And it’s closer to the class of nuclear missile cruisers.

Judging by the statements and the degree of concern of the country's leadership on the issue of naval missile defense, the Leader will become its basis. It seems to me that this seems like the truth.
Although, who knows them, the modern military! They have seven Fridays for weeks and 13 months a year!

[NEXUS]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

Judging by the statements and the degree of concern of the country's leadership on the issue of naval missile defense, the Leader will become its basis. It seems to me that this seems like the truth.

Partly possible ... but, a number of questions arise
1 How many Leaders are planned to build and for how long.
2 How much financially can we afford these ships, given the fact that it is necessary to build submarines and corvettes and frigates ..
3 Only for naval missile defense are they needed or to accompany and protect future aircraft carriers.
4 What weapons will be on these ships
5 Will we build TARKs by building these ARKs.
6 Will lighter (really) destroyers with a gas turbine power plant be built for our fleet.

[izya top]

and intelligence, as usual, from social networks?

[WE ARE MAKING]

Patriotism in me supports the military-industrial complex ...

[lukewarm]

In me too. I wonder what supports the workers of the military-industrial complex themselves. Maybe price tags and tariffs?

[Engineer]

This is not a Leader layout. This is a model of the Krylov Central Research Institute of Export Destroyer not with YaSU. But the leader is Severnoe Design Bureau and he will be with YaSU.

[Stanislas]

Quote: Engineer

This is not a Leader layout

It would be necessary to mention this in the caption to the photo, otherwise people are discussing the ship’s add-on with might and main, and this, it turns out, is completely off topic.

[fa2998]

Quote: kote119

The leader is only in the drawings and in the mock-ups, and when it will be in the iron is not clear.

And maybe there’s no time. Another five years they will show the layout, then the performance characteristics will become obsolete and a new project will start. We have an amazing country — a country of corvettes and patrol ships. Well, a bunch of projects of small ships (boats). I'm not talking about large ships - when we begin to build destroyers!

[kote119]

yes, I agree with you, there is such a sin in our military - political elite.

[moskowit]

Well, my friends, let's try to believe the speakers.

[LÄRZ]

Really? Peacock finished self-esteem and paid attention to others ... Tremble, aspids! And we’ll seek money for this matter.

[Foxbed]

Quote: oleg-gr

Congress intimidation began. They will soon recall the lack of funding. Another justification: the military budget needs to be increased.

Intimidate, don’t intimidate, money is limited. There are too many military bases around the world and AUG in the oceans. Even such a huge budget is not enough for everything. Yes, and every year the budget is accepted with a huge deficit. And our fellows. Well done! It’s hard, but -try!

[PPD]

Exactly! All empires fell apart not because of enemy influence, but because of exorbitant
spending on military toys. And because of stupid ambitions like we are a superpower!

[Zomanus]

Yes, they’re not even afraid of norms, but simply taken into account.
Well, such as how we take into account the American missile defense system at our borders.
Only to such a "Leader" and "entourage" must be worthy.
So, for a smaller class, we would have to learn how to build ships well.

[Extraneous]

The "leader" does not need an entourage, by and large. This is a multipurpose ship capable of performing tasks independently.
Actually, it seems to me that the farther - the less significant surface ships will be. Too vulnerable. In this sense, the development of the submarine fleet is more promising.

[MATROSKIN-53]

Since the times of Empress Catherine II, the Russian fleet has been the strongest in the world. He did not give up his positions in the USSR. So why in the modern world do we not take a leading position ?! I believe that our Navy will be on top!

[bedinvlad]

Really? As far as I know. the strongest in the world at that time was only English. Which alone could withstand any fleet of another power. And all the others, including Russia, did not have such an opportunity.

[TVM - 75]

The "Leader" superstructure is clearly cheating. It seems that the layout was made by Yudashkin's designers, and not sailors and shipbuilders.

[NEXUS]

Quote: TBM - 75

The "Leader" superstructure is clearly cheating. It seems that the layout was made by Yudashkin's designers, and not sailors and shipbuilders.

This is not a Leader, but a Flurry ...

[prorab_ak]

This article is a junk. It’s some kind of a jumble of excerpts of various articles and statements taken out of context, not a single specific source or confirming fact ... a set of unfounded statements ... the insertion of the Ministry of Defense procurement official at the end of 2006 was especially amused
On what else to expect from RIA NEWS ???

[Anchonsha]

Pentagoners howled to scare fear at their sponsors and the White House administration in order to increase finances. But is there even more to inflate the Pentagon's military budget? Oh, how hard and terrible this vile country will be when their greatness begins to crumble

[Navy7981]

Handsome !!!!! God grant that he would come true.

[DobryAAH]

Ours is right that the submarine fleet is being built first. Stealth and power - in one bottle.

[Evgeniy667b]

We are able to make mockups! And they know how well. Even retrofit a radio control system and water. From afar, without the visibility of the coast and for a full-size one can be taken. Here are just real warships built for many years and do not keep up with the natural decline. Industrial enterprises need to be restored, and not to finish off those that have it. (Omsk tank, etc.)

[seregatara1969]

Well, if noted, things will go well

[KOH]

I was arguing about two years ago, here on the website, that our tanks are not rusty, and that modern equipment is supplied to the troops, minus how much in vain I was, now I can just say about Putin ... "we more than once again we will surprise them ... ", so no need to panic, about the same" Leader ", they took you and laid out everything, when and what, everything in good time, our" partners "slept through the time when Russia could be bent, (late 90s , early 00x), and as they say the train, in the form of "Stiletto", or "Sarmat", has already left ...)))))

[NordUral]

The main thing is that our teeth do not speak.

[Black]

This is how a very naval thing comes to mind - "In reality, it is not at all the same as in reality!"

[Lissyara]

Quote: BENNERT

I have the same leader at home on a shelf

And what? With the reactor?
In general, the American is right, "Severodvinsk" has been built and rebuilt since 1993. We ourselves know what times we lived. I published an article here about K-306, so under Leonid Ilyich boats were "baked like pies." In 1967 it was laid down, in 1969 it became part of the Northern Fleet.
But the most important thing is that they will be built!

[Wolka]

judging by the layout of the boat the project is really a bit old

[chunga-changa]

The Americans decided to trick the rozogin. The creation of a "fleet of the 21st century" by the 30s of the same century, from the ships of the last century, is a mockery. By this time, the Americans will really have a fleet of the 21st century, from unmanned reconnaissance and attack ships, and then rozogin opa - reports on the descent of the atomic "primakov", handsome. Not to mention the fact that each of our nuclear submarines will be continuously accompanied by a pair of PLO drones.
The civilized world has developed digital for the last 40 years, computers, programs, investments have yielded results - the possibility of wide automation and some autonomy. Initially, all this was used in the most advanced field, where money did not matter - space. Now begins the massive introduction of technology in all areas, including the military.
We have no success, the last few years have been trying to "revive" ie. at least to return the most basic technologies and industries to the level of the USSR. Along the way, it turned out that even "this technology remained from the times of the USSR and is obsolete" gas turbine installations and diesel engines of all the necessary nomenclature are not produced in the country.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: chunga-changa

Initially, all this was used in the most advanced field, where money did not matter - space.

It is in the space field that investments are needed like nowhere else!
A simple example. International Space Station (ISS). The cost of creating and maintaining the station in a working condition, according to rough estimates by experts, has already exceeded $ 150 billion. The cost of the ISS does not fit into any previous framework. Thus, the Soviet Union spent $ 4,1 billion on the Mir station, while the United States spent only $ 3 billion on the Skylab orbital station.
Apollo program. The US National Aerospace Agency (NASA) spent about $ 26 billion.
System "Energia" - "Buran". For 14 years, 16 billion Soviet (those still) rubles were invested in the creation of the Soviet shuttle.
American GPS. Created for military purposes, it cost the state $ 12 billion.
Space Telescope "James Webb". The real cost of the project has already reached $ 4,5 billion.
http://www.rbc.ru/society/06/04/2011/571281.shtml

Quote: chunga-changa

We have no success

I don’t know how you do, but Russia does. Incidentally, Putin spoke about this at his press conference. (Aviadviglo PD-14, the world's best nuclear power plants, unsurpassed heat-resistant materials, etc.).

[dchegrinec]

Creation cannot appreciate the creator .. The West is taken to evaluate our level, while they themselves are behind us! It’s ridiculous.

[Old26]

Quote: maks-xnumx

The main thing in this article is that the Americans greatly underestimate the potential of RUSSIA.
Russia can and a lot can do what America cannot. They think there only with money and not very soberly, and we are drunk, not washed and not democratic. Russia does not obey them (for example, we Indians are navels)

We also underestimate the potential of the United States and sometimes overestimate ours. And about the "unwashed" and other things. You should not equate the screams of politicians and the media and those who really make decisions based on the data of the special services

Quote: Alexey-74

The Russian Navy will be the strongest, even if it is inferior in numbers.

Logical mismatch. It will be the strongest, even if it is inferior in number. Development goes in close ways and it is impossible to create a ship that will be several times superior to similar ships on the other side.

Quote: APASUS

Quote: oleg-gr

Congress intimidation began. They will soon recall the lack of funding. Another justification: the military budget needs to be increased.

The Americans are so predictable, I wonder what they are now writing about how America will respond to the new Russian missile "Caliber" and X-101 ??? There probably all the regiments are crammed with horror stories about these missiles with the demand to immediately take measures to overcome the American backlog !!

On the "new" Russian missiles? I think nothing. Unless they will only release another modification of their similar rocket, which is already a quarter of a century old. As for the anti-ship missile, they are already working on it. But about the X101 - yes, the Americans need to either restore the production of the destroyed ones, or design a new one.

Quote: Izotovp

Thank you, sorry for the little information.

Hammer in the search engine "Storming the Depths" and you will find everything your heart desires (regarding boats)

[Donfrog]

Notably licked

[linen]

Build! To build! Slowly and very high quality! The most modern, the most advanced in these projects!

[P81]

It's time to rebuild the surface fleet, not to rely on submarines alone! We need ships not only for effective responses to threats from our "partners", but also for demonstrating the strength and might of the Russian fleet in any point of the world accessible to ships !!!

[roma-belij]

We would have more money for this whole thing (((

[Tu-214R]

With such an add-on, it is somewhat similar to the Japanese dreadnought Yamato.

[RussCommunist]

American intelligence? )))))) OR OUR LIBERALS? LODIES and UHImoscow