Media: a criminal court in The Hague will not be able to start proceedings for the accession of Crimea to Russia

100
The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague will not be able by Kiev to initiate proceedings on the fact of the annexation of the Crimea to the Russian Federation, reports RIA News message from the ICC representative Fadi El-Abdullah.



Abdullah noted that “the function of the consideration of cases related to the so-called acts of aggression may appear at the International Criminal Court only at the end of 2017, in the event that the relevant norms are ratified by at least the 30 states”.

“This rule (the handling of cases involving“ aggression ”) is recorded in the Rome Statute, but will take effect from the 2017 year. In November 2017, a vote should be held on whether we want to step up this part of the court or not. Depending on the results of the voting, we will know whether this crime falls under the jurisdiction of the court, ”he explained to an UNIAN correspondent.

That is, now the court can not initiate proceedings in the Crimea. In addition, it will not be initiated after the (successful) voting procedure is completed.

“I don’t think this applies to facts that were in the past. Events that occurred before the amendment regarding an act of aggression enters into force will not be considered by the court, ”said Abdullah.

Earlier, the Ukrainian authorities (the Rada and the Prosecutor General’s Office) sent materials to The Hague that allegedly prove the illegality of the annexation of Crimea to the Russian Federation, but the case was never opened.
100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Riv
    +21
    13 December 2015 09: 45
    The law has no retroactive force, it is logical. However, it often happens that it still has ...
    1. +60
      13 December 2015 09: 52
      The IMF decision showed that everything is possible in arranged according to the standards of mattress covers, international relations. God bless me.
      1. +8
        13 December 2015 10: 18


        Abdullah noted that “the function of the consideration of cases related to the so-called acts of aggression may appear at the International Criminal Court only at the end of 2017, in the event that the relevant norms are ratified by at least the 30 states”.
        Main question! Who are the judges? Or do not judge, you will not be judged.
        1. +33
          13 December 2015 11: 13
          If it is allowed to consider cases that occurred before the adoption of the new norm, then what will begin?

          Serbia will sue NATO countries, Libya against EU countries, etc.

          What will be the limitation period, 100, 1000 or 5000 years?




          1. +14
            13 December 2015 11: 56
            The world is on the verge of a great political redivision, and when it ends no one can know.
            1. +21
              13 December 2015 12: 05
              Judge, do not judge, but Crimea is Russian land! Territories, like organs in the body, sewn up someone else's, sooner or later a rejection reaction occurs. Therefore, Crimea and returned to Russia! The laws of nature, however! negative
          2. +18
            13 December 2015 12: 11
            Ukraine can sue, but first it is necessary to conduct border democratization and demilitation. (vybor.ua ›Ukraine.) Ukraine is still the administrative district of Russia, according to UN documents. And no one bothers us to call Sivash the Republic of Crimea, part of Ukraine.
          3. +7
            13 December 2015 12: 39
            Serbia will sue NATO countries, Libya against EU countries, etc.

            It all depends on the composition and subordination of the court. For example, we have 6 years of strict regime for stealing chicken, and a suspended sentence for stealing billions. Therefore, Libya with Serbia can even file a lawsuit to the end of the world, the court decision will be negative. Or they will say that the situation with the Crimea is an exceptional case, there are already examples.
            1. +1
              14 December 2015 00: 18
              I did not know that on Chung-Chang such a severe UK.
          4. +9
            13 December 2015 12: 42
            Quote: bulvas
            Serbia will sue NATO countries, Libya against EU countries, etc.

            Belarus will claim Lithuania’s claim to Vilnus and Poland’s claim to Bialystok, even the Americans will not take such a step since they have the most stigma in the cannon.

            In Crimea, it will still be necessary to prove the legality of joining Ukraine.
            1. +3
              15 December 2015 10: 02
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              Belarus will declare Lithuania’s claim to Vilnуwith, and Poland to Bialystok ...

              And there is nothing strange in this if the Lithuanians themselves say on this occasion that Vilnius is the closest regional center to Minsk (only 160 km), unlike Brest, Grodno, Vitebsk, Mogilev and Gomel. Those. understand the historical truth. good But I don’t remember something about the fact that the leadership of Belarus in the post-Soviet era made any territorial claims to anyone what
              PS I would like to correct my colleague on the forum: there is no such state "Belarus", there is Belarus or the Republic of Belarus - so it will be more correct hi
              1. The comment was deleted.
          5. +6
            13 December 2015 12: 55
            Quote: bulvas
            If it is allowed to consider cases that occurred before the adoption of the new norm, then what will begin?


            Of course it will be. They will declare, for example, that Russia's aggression continues to this day (2017, 2018, etc.), and if so, it comes under consideration. There are no norms or laws in the West, only their "Wishlist", sprinkled with tinsel "courts" and "laws" ...
            1. +1
              14 December 2015 07: 29
              "..." Wishlist ", sprinkled with tinsel" courts "and" laws "..."
              according to the firm conviction of some of our stubborn, unshakable European-American values.
              Ukrainians on this matter burned the country.
              The truth is in the world. Easily, without struggle, it came, so it went. Invented by Russophobes from the Russian nation, Ukrov actually showed its complete failure. The most amazing thing is that in many ways it was the Russians and under their leadership that the Ukro-nation underwent a run-in and first formation. Either we didn’t work out, or the idea was rotten, or the fishing rod with cookies got hooked early, or the Jews ruined everything by asking for hetman, what went wrong. It's funny that the Russians are again blamed for the failed experiment. Or maybe today we are observing the revenge of the descendants of the Jews, the descendants of those Russians who, under the banner of the hetman B. Khmelnitsky 350 years ago, riled their ancestors very seriously. Around like in Spain.
          6. +9
            13 December 2015 13: 17
            I do not know about the statute of limitations. But the first Jews to submit to Egypt! Or archaeologists of Ukraine will prove the genocide of dinosaurs in relation to the ancient y-k-r-a-m !!! hi
          7. -1
            13 December 2015 14: 33
            just a couple of years since the Crimea left.
            It is necessary to settle border conflicts with neighboring countries in order to accept 404 in NATU without delay and unnecessary problems. And LDN strangle by the year 17.

            PS oh, and a steep brew is brewed.
          8. WKS
            +2
            13 December 2015 21: 23
            Quote: bulvas
            Serbia will sue NATO countries, Libya against EU countries, etc.

            What will be the limitation period, 100, 1000 or 5000 years?

            Then the Roman Empire will sue Carthage.
          9. 0
            15 December 2015 11: 03
            Yes, the amendment will be introduced "Only in relation to Russia." Delov - that. They are crooks. They have no concept of "justice", but there is a concept according to the law. From some side this is good, but the question arises who are the judges and what is the law, i.e. any question can be solved in your favor by changing what? Correctly either the law or the judges.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +1
          15 December 2015 10: 51
          That's right, as soon as I read the article I remembered about Kosovo, East Germany, the Falkland Islands, and this is just a snap. The West dictates the rules. When the power of the West, intellectual and military, was not in doubt, and the USSR, for its part, was interested in maintaining these rules, everyone was happy. Now the relics of the Zapadentsev are in great doubt, and Russia, unfortunately, in order to preserve itself, must confront the west, it happened. In general, they will change the rules, since they themselves established them.
      2. +5
        13 December 2015 17: 09
        The annexation of Crimea to Ukraine was not entirely legal; there is no agreement with Ukraine on the border. And a lot of questions that are not stipulated either by treaties or laws. Therefore, there are no prospects for such a trial. Only mud and fiction have been blown to Russia and nothing more.
    2. +2
      13 December 2015 10: 02
      Quote: Riv
      The law has no retroactive force, it is logical. However, it often happens that it still has ...

      Well, in the USSR, I still had it. business of foreign exchange agents. and shot the poor fellow sad
      1. +19
        13 December 2015 10: 14
        That's all you need to know about the rule of law at the present time ... sad
        Turkey refused to return stolen Daish art objects to Syria http://rusnovosti.ru/posts/399518


        As for the Crimea ... so Yanukovych knew everything in 2011 year ... laughing


        Poroshenko called on deputies to defeat Russia with the help of intellect.

        Well, that's nice ... peremoga now they just do not shine laughing
        1. +8
          13 December 2015 10: 58
          Quote: Sid.74
          Poroshenko called on deputies to defeat Russia with the help of intellect.

          Feel free to ask: where does the quote come from?
          Well, the question arising from the quote: where will they get the intelligence? Judging by the situation in the country, he left Ukraine a long time ago hi
          1. +3
            13 December 2015 11: 15
            Quote: pvv113
            Quote: Sid.74
            Poroshenko called on deputies to defeat Russia with the help of intellect.

            Feel free to ask: where does the quote come from?
            Well, the question arising from the quote: where will they get the intelligence? Judging by the situation in the country, he left Ukraine a long time ago hi



            "Intelligence" is their fists

            They will summon Duma deputies to fistfight and try to defeat them, or at least shout down




          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. +9
            13 December 2015 13: 04
            Quote: pvv113
            Feel free to ask: where does the quote come from?

            So, from here ... http: //lenta.ru/news/2015/12/12/poroshenko/

            President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko urged the Verkhovna Rada to vote for the adoption of the law on the decentralization of power and said that Russia can be defeated with the help of "high intelligence". This was reported on Saturday, December 12, on the website of the head of state.

            “I count on the wisdom and intelligence of the highest legislative body of Ukraine. Our IQ must exceed 300since only a very high intellect, together with the power of our Armed Forces will allow us to defeat such a strong enemy as Russia, ”said Poroshenko.

            In the Rada of 450 deputies, it turns out that they have an aykyu factor of less than one per brother ... laughing It is brilliant, because nobody is sarcastic about the deputies .... wassat
            1. +2
              13 December 2015 14: 45
              An IQ of less than one is something intimidating. wink
              From Wikipedia, article "IQ" "
              IQ tests are designed so that the results are described by a normal distribution with an average IQ of 100, and such a spread that 50% of people have IQs between 90 and 110 and 25% each below 90 and above 110. An IQ of less than 70 is often classified as mental retardation..

              hi
          5. +2
            14 December 2015 14: 56
            But do you not know that all the great figures of Mankind are secret u? Rs? smile
          6. 0
            14 December 2015 14: 56
            Do you not know that all the great figures of Mankind are secret ukry? smile
          7. 0
            15 December 2015 11: 21
            Well, the question arising from the quote: where will they get the intelligence?

            It is sold only at Roshen chocolate factories.
      2. mihasik
        +5
        13 December 2015 10: 30
        Quote: Lukich
        Quote: Riv
        The law has no retroactive force, it is logical. However, it often happens that it still has ...

        Well, in the USSR, I still had it. business of foreign exchange agents. and shot the poor fellow sad

        Well, actually, the death penalty was relied on for that. And why? And because the USSR bought all goods abroad for gold and currency, the proceeds from the sale of oil and gas. Illegal foreign exchange operations undermined the country's gold reserves, this amounted to sabotage against the state, but saboteurs, you know, to the wall.
        1. +6
          13 December 2015 10: 40
          Svidomye in despondency, probably. Another zrada. So, the case of aggression is not possible ... they will scratch the sedentary and come up with something for the next zrada. laughing
          1. +3
            13 December 2015 10: 44
            Yeah! What are you? doesn’t a stone flower come out?
            1. 0
              15 December 2015 10: 20
              Quote: guzik007
              Yeah! What are you? doesn’t a stone flower come out?

              Even if you give a laxative, it still will not work ... lol
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +3
          13 December 2015 10: 51
          I will add. Western intelligence agencies did not have legal ways to get Soviet currency in those days (not to supply spies with fakes), so these guys also worked for enemy intelligence agencies, albeit indirectly.
      3. +2
        13 December 2015 22: 38
        You mean the case when already convicted people were condemned again.
        I would like to add that this was done by personal order of Nikita Khrushchev.
        He was not friends with the law - an example of the transfer of Crimea (along with people!) To Ukraine.
        I do not know of any other case in the USSR on violation of the law of "retroactive force".
        Remind me?
        1. +4
          14 December 2015 07: 41
          The "maize" Khrushchev (Perlamunder) was not a decree. He was his own law. I turn what I want - his law. He even ignored the laws of nature. He demanded to grow heat-loving corn in the North. Everyone knows about the slander of the best Soviet leader, Comrade Stalin, but not everyone remembers how long ago Stalin became bad. Here, too, "Nikitkin" ears are visible. The Trotskyist is not finished. It was he who planted the bomb near the USSR, which went off in 1991.
          Crimea is only an episode of its huge wrecking activity for the benefit of our enemies.
      4. 0
        14 December 2015 23: 10
        A very positive example.
    3. 0
      13 December 2015 10: 45
      and the Hague realized that there was no point. all the same, we won’t give it back. whoever decides in court. the demon is in fact. so they refused.
    4. +1
      13 December 2015 11: 28
      Quote: Riv
      The law has no retroactive force, it is logical. However, it often happens that it still has ...

      -------------------------
      That is, at first they rejected the current Constitution, then they refer to it? Amazing doublethink, I wonder how they pulled references to their own laws? And probably the Crimean legislation was completely ignored. But what about the use of the army against its own population? But what about the numerous blockades-food, energy, financial?
      1. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      13 December 2015 13: 59
      Quote: Riv
      The law has no retroactive force, it is logical. However, it often happens that it still has ...

      Another zrada for Svidomo laughing
    6. +5
      13 December 2015 16: 51
      The law has no retroactive force, it is logical. However, it often happens that it still has ...

      New amendments to the Russian Constitution were made on time !! The new law reads "Any requirements of the international court (including payments to fugitive aligarchs) are not obligatory for execution if they contradict the laws of the Russian Federation !!! DANGER !!! Yaytsenyuk !!! !!! Waiting for you all ....
    7. +1
      13 December 2015 18: 31
      this happens when they have the law ..... and this is for our American and European partners - just spit ...
    8. +2
      14 December 2015 15: 51
      No matter how! The Yukosians at The Hague Arbitration Court reached a decision based on the Energy Charter, which the Russian Federation has not ratified. Thieves homosexual triumph.

      The Netherlands in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea has initiated an Arctic Sunrise case. The Embassy of the Russian Federation in Berlin informed the Tribunal that the Russian Federation does not intend to participate in the proceedings, referring to the statement made upon the ratification of the Convention on February 26, 1997, that the Russian Federation "does not accept dispute settlement procedures provided for in the Convention leading to binding decisions on disputes over the exercise of sovereign rights and jurisdiction"Based on this, the Russian side informed the Netherlands and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea that"she does not accept the arbitration procedure in the Arctic Sunrise case"and also does not intend to participate in the interim measures before the Tribunal." The decision was made against Russia anyway. Green homosexuals triumph.
    9. 0
      14 December 2015 23: 35
      It’s strange if they are such guardians of law, why didn’t they sue themselves for an illegal seizure of power?
    10. 0
      15 December 2015 00: 05
      And how many howls were on censore ...! laughing
  2. +6
    13 December 2015 09: 45
    In other words, they answered Kiev: a warhead on your collar!
    1. +3
      13 December 2015 09: 48
      In other words: "NO" and no trial!
  3. +8
    13 December 2015 09: 47
    Not by washing, so by skating. Everything in Ukraine would be fine, who would flee from Kiev.
  4. +11
    13 December 2015 09: 47
    If they accept the case in the Crimea, let Kosovo, Transnistria, Abkhazia, Ossetia be considered similarly.
    England and Spain have similar problems and much more.
    1. +26
      13 December 2015 09: 50
      Quote: Consul-t
      If they accept the case in the Crimea, let Kosovo, Transnistria, Abkhazia, Ossetia be considered similarly.
      England and Spain have similar problems and much more.
      1. +21
        13 December 2015 10: 00
        Sea blockade of Crimea, yes of course laughing
        1. +6
          13 December 2015 10: 21
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Sea blockade of Crimea, yes yes, of course laughing

          This of course is a good picture - only the Chinese ships on it ... ours

          1. +1
            13 December 2015 11: 58
            Quote: 11 black
            only the ships on it are Chinese ... ours are

            Is everything right with the Urainsky fleet?
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +3
              13 December 2015 14: 46
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              only the ships on it are Chinese ... ours are

              Is everything right with the Urainsky fleet?

              Nearly )))

              This is "Krasnoperekopsk" - an old, like a mammoth turd, a hero of not so long-standing events in an attempt to blockade Crimea, well, or why were they trying ...
              I advise everyone to familiarize themselves with this story - we read
              http://topwar.ru/76482-mirazh-idet-domoy.html
              1. 0
                15 December 2015 19: 07
                They tried to flood him on the fairway?
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +15
        13 December 2015 10: 00
        Denis .... laughing Immediately I remembered a phrase from the DMB film .... Swim, swim, Ikhtiandry. @ # * $
    2. +4
      13 December 2015 09: 59
      No, what kind of noise is that ??? Well, even if this court decides that Russia should return Crimea to Ukraine, so what? It will be the largest bolt ever made by Russia on anyone. lol
      1. +3
        13 December 2015 10: 16
        what Crimea. by the end of the 17th year of Ukraine as such there will not be novorosiya or RUSSIA. so hell to them and not Crimea
      2. +3
        13 December 2015 10: 59
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        It will be the largest bolt ever made by Russia on anyone.


        Hey.
        Not a bolt, but a screw, I think so.
    3. +1
      13 December 2015 10: 39
      Quote: Consul-t
      If they accept the case in the Crimea, let Kosovo, Transnistria, Abkhazia, Ossetia be considered similarly.
      England and Spain have similar problems and much more.

      Yes, there was still Cyprus before the Crimea, and nothing was recognized as unrecognized, and how many resolutions have been adopted - no matter what!
  5. +1
    13 December 2015 09: 47
    The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague will not be able to initiate proceedings on the appeal of Kiev upon the accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation
    There are no arguments for Kiev. How so ?!
    They marvel at the impossible for overseas children!
  6. +6
    13 December 2015 09: 50
    The result of this "fair trial" will be predictable, it is worth recalling the "impartial judicial clowning" in Yugoslavia.
  7. +5
    13 December 2015 09: 51
    It is not a matter of whether or not a case will be instituted. The fact is: will there be a country that would like to initiate this case.
    1. +2
      13 December 2015 11: 07
      Quote: EvgNik
      It is not a matter of whether or not a case will be instituted. The fact is: will there be a country that would like to initiate this case.

      This will be something new in criminal law - “the case was dropped due to the death of the applicant”. wink
  8. +1
    13 December 2015 09: 51
    Oh, and now the next "REMOVAL" turned into "ZRADA". I wonder who will be called "Putin's agent" this time?
  9. +1
    13 December 2015 09: 53
    Yes, I’m generally shocked how this collective West misses such an opportunity to bite Russia ... logically, before they considered the Ukrainians’ application, they had to vote and vote, as the black gentleman would indicate ...
    all this is strange ...
  10. +6
    13 December 2015 09: 53
    Interview the living "affected" local residents, now for all their "love" and "attention" they will return to Banderland, except in tanks. In general, the ukrofashists remind me of an envious alcoholic who, with beatings and insults, wants to arouse the love of his wife who left him.
  11. +9
    13 December 2015 10: 00
    The Hague Criminal Court
    Issued by the Kiev team:
    "Our business is a hut on the edge,
    What to do with the Crimea, I do not know! "
  12. +4
    13 December 2015 10: 01
    Earlier, the Ukrainian authorities (the Rada and the Prosecutor General’s Office) sent materials to The Hague that allegedly prove the illegality of the annexation of Crimea to the Russian Federation, but the case was never opened.

    They were tired of jumping, I liked it. And do not want to answer for the destroyed monuments? And for the blown power line?
    From the Internet:
    - What else remains to be done to complete the decommunization of Ukraine? - Put out all the lights Ilyich.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +2
    13 December 2015 10: 02
    Media: a criminal court in The Hague will not be able to start proceedings for the accession of Crimea to Russia
    And here Ukraine was broken off. Until 2017, there will be nothing left from Ukraine, all territories will scatter. hi
  15. +5
    13 December 2015 10: 04
    First, it would be necessary to prove that Crimea generally belonged to the outskirts on some grounds. But they will not prove, we can demand other gifts back.
  16. BAT
    +2
    13 December 2015 10: 06
    So far the essence and the matter, until the turn comes to the proceedings at the expense of the Crimea and there will be nothing to disassemble ... Everyone has slowly (so far behind the scenes) they began to recognize Crimea as Russian. And by that time everyone would get used to this situation. And many more events will occur that will eclipse the outskirts. She already became not very interesting, she was tired of the West specifically. And after a few years, the mention of the outskirts will cause many Western politicians to be simply annoying.
  17. +1
    13 December 2015 10: 11
    good attempts again turn out to be in vain ... In humans, the desire for everything to be and there was nothing for it is ineradicable ...
  18. +1
    13 December 2015 10: 15
    I believe it will be necessary to file a parallel lawsuit against Khrushchev’s lawfulness ...
  19. +1
    13 December 2015 10: 20
    The train is gone, dry the oars.
  20. +1
    13 December 2015 10: 21
    Ukraine clicked on the nose, which they stuck too far.
    In 2017, both in Ukraine and the United States, the power can change, now they say a lot about the resignation of the current government of Ukraine.
  21. 0
    13 December 2015 10: 27
    If we draw an analogy, then after the November Revolution of 1917, the outskirts began to turn into a significant territory. But since nothing happens forever, apparently, from November 2017, the countdown will begin, the process has begun. We are waiting.
  22. 0
    13 December 2015 10: 38
    The casuistry of legislation is such that competent, interested lawyers can find a clue. In this case, the unequivocal answer "..... well, you ... your problems are over the roof"
    1. 0
      13 December 2015 10: 57
      Quote: ODERVIT
      The casuistry of legislation is such that competent, interested lawyers can find a clue. In this case, the unequivocal answer "..... well, you ... your problems are over the roof"

      It is possible in three words, - We can’t, we don’t want, we won’t!
      In general, forest, forest, forest horses.
  23. +5
    13 December 2015 10: 39
    Senators approved a bill giving the Federal Constitutional Court the right to declare impossible the enforcement in Russia of decisions of international courts if they violate the supremacy of the Russian Constitution.
    http://www.rg.ru/2015/12/09/senatory-site.html
  24. +6
    13 December 2015 10: 46
    Something that events in all directions began to develop faster. Wars, revolutions, migration ... You don't have time to get used to the news at such a speed. After the "well-fed" calm of the XNUMXs, the last two years, like skiing on the slope ... I'm not afraid of problems , I'm afraid of betrayal from within ...
  25. +3
    13 December 2015 10: 52
    So is it zrada or overwhelming? It’s just that I have little command of artificial languages. smile
  26. 0
    13 December 2015 11: 01
    Somewhere cried Svidomo Petro ...
  27. 0
    13 December 2015 11: 02
    Full zradoperemoga forever! Federalize soon, territory 404, I want to see a couple more episodes.
  28. +3
    13 December 2015 11: 02
    There is no agreement on the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine, and the corresponding resolution of Khrushchev is not illegal, since it has not been ratified by the Supreme Council. That is, there are no basic documents confirming the legality of the fact of the Crimea being part of Ukraine. There is nothing to appeal to the court.
  29. +2
    13 December 2015 11: 04
    The idiotic story of the transfer of Crimea and other southeastern lands to Ukraine is Russia's science for the future, that brothers, bros and even union states, which Belarus is now, are always ready to betray from the mercantile interests of those in power. Russia now has allied states: ARMY, Navy and VKS. And if Belarus, Kazakhstan decided to create the Eurasian Economic Community, then they need to take into account the political situation around Russia. And the Hague court in Crimea is a geyropeysky creation with double and triple standards. This imaginary court should first of all be guided by the Constitutions of all autonomous entities included in Ukraine, as well as the UN Charter, which stipulates the right of Crimea to decide on secession from Ukraine.
  30. +1
    13 December 2015 11: 12
    By the way, through this Law it is possible to sue the Turks with the Poles and the Baltic states and the United States and demand everything back. Up to Alaska and California ....
  31. +3
    13 December 2015 11: 18
    you need to help dill, and then all zrada yes zrada recourse
    let them write down the address sportloto- Moscow, pr-kt. Volgogradsky, d. 43, building 3
  32. 0
    13 December 2015 11: 26
    Quote: Riv
    The law has no retroactive force, it is logical. However, it often happens that it still has ...

    This is if by the login of normal thinking. And now such in Fashington and Geyrop is not visible.
  33. +3
    13 December 2015 11: 48
    Yeah, yes, of course. Let them accept this law. And by then either the donkey will die, or the emir will die. Surely, the amendment adopted by the IMF will only apply to today's Ukraine. All those who want to repeat the Ukrainian somersault will be denied. It will be the same with this law (if it is only adopted). He will act ONLY for Ukraine. Why? Well, you are smart, you will find the answer yourself.
  34. -1
    13 December 2015 11: 51
    In fact, it is necessary to get an international, authoritative assessment of the annexed Crimea. And, first of all, Russia should find or contribute to the creation of such an organization, nowadays existing ones are considered biased. Otherwise, Russia will be pointed out and belittled, referring to the uncertainty of the Crimea from the point of view of international recognition in different circumstances. Something like: sanctions, the accession of Free Kurdistan to Turkey, and much more, what else will happen in the future, because the field for provocations is huge.
  35. +1
    13 December 2015 12: 11
    Quote: cniza
    The world is on the verge of a great political redivision, and when it ends no one can know.

    So far, Russia has not pulled everyone by the ears in the corners, like naughty bullies. Every hundred years they get luli. And this time they begin to hooligan. And I wanted to live peacefully, but ... But Putin said that this was not our choice.
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. 0
    13 December 2015 12: 17
    Quote: pvv113
    Quote: Sid.74
    Poroshenko called on deputies to defeat Russia with the help of intellect.

    Feel free to ask: where does the quote come from?
    Well, the question arising from the quote: where will they get the intelligence? Judging by the situation in the country, he left Ukraine a long time ago hi

    Intelligence ...? ?
    And how do you spell it or pronounce it by (on) move?
    We should consult with Yaytsenyukh, or with Yarosh - they will clarify that - do not ask what tongue
    1. +2
      13 December 2015 15: 25
      Quote: Very old
      And how do you spell it or pronounce it by (on) move?


      Intellect is not translated. He is either there or not.

      And about the intelligence you need to ask Klitschko, he will tell ...
  38. +1
    13 December 2015 12: 19
    Quote: feniks
    the right to declare impossible the enforcement in Russia of decisions of international courts if they violate the supremacy of the Russian Constitution.

    "+" !!
    So act:
    maydaunov - stupidity;
    at pindocs - arrogance;
    and we have the law! ..
    Only here to supplement the Constitution if necessary.
  39. +1
    13 December 2015 12: 25
    Well, how are you, ate Crimean land? laughing
  40. +3
    13 December 2015 13: 37
    Everything in the West is working against us at The Hague, all courts, Oscars, Nobili, Hollywood, etc. For these purposes, they were created to fight the rebellious, with the illusion of the whole world.

    Despite the fact that all the mattresses ... wherever they want, they go in there, do not ask anything from anyone, and they are not interested in the opinions of others, even the whole world, they have the right to be strong.

    We also need this, just be strong, grow and grow, these Hague leave everything to other countries, we will smile with sarcasm.
  41. The comment was deleted.
  42. 0
    13 December 2015 17: 51
    “I don’t think this applies to facts that were in the past. Events that occurred before the amendment regarding an act of aggression enters into force will not be considered by the court, ”said Abdullah.


    Nevertheless, it was nice to read that at least something broke off among Ukrainians. hi
  43. +3
    13 December 2015 20: 36
    materials that allegedly prove the illegality of the accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation ...
    We could be introduced to these materials so that we also learn these secrets.
  44. 0
    13 December 2015 23: 57
    But the junta didn’t die?
    They wanted to take the rabbit to castration, the platform saved.
  45. 0
    14 December 2015 00: 16
    In general, the Hague otmontovoy otmazyva besmont, and moved off the topic.
    As the saying goes, "went first."
  46. 0
    14 December 2015 05: 23
    where 2017 and where are we, and this inglorious dirty girl Ukraine would still survive ...
  47. +1
    14 December 2015 17: 52
    for the sake of Ukraine, no one dares to open this Pandora's box
  48. +1
    14 December 2015 18: 21
    I’m probably lost
  49. 0
    14 December 2015 20: 22
    atom will have to judge northern colombia for the occupation of texas
  50. 0
    15 December 2015 14: 48
    Unless the Hague suddenly, like the IMF, decides to change the principles)
  51. 0
    15 December 2015 18: 02
    Strange....))) Then the Poles also need to file claims against Ukraine (part of the lands went to the USSR (Ukraine now)... Mexico against the USA.....
  52. 0
    15 December 2015 19: 35
    If such a law is adopted, all that remains is to broadcast live on TV from the meetings. Hollywood will undoubtedly go bankrupt! Among the cases being examined, there is everything you could want. If you want a comedy, watch the dispute between Ukraine and Russia. Do you want a tragedy: Ukraine - Novorossiya. Do you want a Western: SGA and the Indians. If you want to talk about the war - Germany and Poland. Science fiction, please: SGA are the aborigines of the Moon. In general, just have time to stock up on popcorn!
  53. 0
    15 December 2015 21: 44
    It's the ears of a dead donkey, not Crimea!!!