Military Review

Under high voltage

27
The country's foreign policy is more meaningful and more understandable to the world than the internal


At the VI International Geopolitical Congress “The Scientific Paradigm of Civilization of the 21st Century” held in Moscow, the problems of humanity in the conditions of the formation of the 6 technological structure and ways of overcoming existing conflicts were discussed.

The focus was on the theoretical and methodological foundations of a multipolar world pattern, its appearance in the near future.

“Russia will face great social changes in the period from 2019 to 2022 the year when the issue of the very existence of our country will be decided”
The main organizers of the congress were domestic and international organizations: Union of Geopolitics, Community of World Study Program Scientists (WARP Group), Russian Peace Service, Living Planet, All-Slavic Union. Along with our compatriots, representatives from Venezuela, Germany, Georgia, DPR, India, China, Mexico, Nicaragua, Norway, Palestine, Poland, the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, Syria, and France participated in the work.

Special attention was paid to the analysis of the mechanisms of social transformations in the modern world and the driving forces of social progress, as well as to the justification of the ways of overcoming the global crisis that are acceptable in modern conditions, eliminating or minimizing the possibility of large-scale military clashes and preventing the growth of instability.

Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Juan Vicente Paredes Torrealba, attended the congress and gave a detailed report. Donetsk People's Republic was represented by Foreign Minister Alexander Kofman. He made a report on the origins of the Ukrainian crisis and ways to overcome it. Professor Olga Gukalenko, plenipotentiary of the Parliament of the PMR in Russia, spoke on the topic “Education and Science in the Service of the National Security of the State”. India, Nicaragua, Palestine, and Syria were represented by embassy officers with the rank of second secretary or military attache.

Right Russia


In the speeches of almost all foreign participants there was unconditional support for the actions of Russia in Syria. Deep gratitude was expressed by the representatives of the Arab Republic itself. Anas Mohsen of the Levant Center for Geopolitical Studies in the report cited the monstrous losses of the country's economy during the war years. All speakers blamed the United States for what is happening in the world. The guests, in particular from Germany and Poland, spoke very strictly about this. Foreign representatives, especially European ones, emphasized the exceptional importance of Russia for preserving the traditional foundations of society and the spiritual base of Christianity. The thought was expressed that our country today is actually taking on the mission of the Third Rome - the keeper of human values ​​against the background of spiritlessness and depravity sweeping through the Western world.

Participants in the congress, regardless of nationality, political affiliation and professional affiliation, agreed that liberalism is an advanced ideological echelon of fascism, since it justifies the individual’s right to claim exclusivity and, on this basis, to suppress others. And the ideological core of all fascist concepts is precisely the recognition of the right of an insignificant social group to declare themselves supermen, with no restrictions on others. It is interesting that the criticism addressed to their own authorities in the individual speeches of the Russian participants met with a rather tough response from the guests, especially the European ones.

At the congress promulgated 43 report. Let us single out those that determined the general direction or contained new ideas that had not previously been heard at such events in Russia. In this vein, the speech of the president of the Academy of Rocket and Artillery Sciences, Professor Vasily Burenk "Scientific and Technical Progress - a Benefit or a Threat to Civilization?" His article on this topic has already been published (“Aggravating Innovations”), so it makes no sense to repeat the main points. But let us emphasize the main idea, which was supported in debatable presentations: any discovery that directly affects people brings not only good, but also new risks, even threats. Therefore, before introducing the fruits of scientific research into life, it is necessary to identify the permissible scope of their application, to develop effective measures to prevent possible negative consequences. An important condition for the safety of NTP is the creation of an effective system of state and public control over the results.

Forward to socialism


Note the speech of a world-famous scientist, neurobiologist from the University of Oslo (Kongsberg Hospital) of Dr. Gernot Ernst, devoted to the study of morphological changes in the human brain depending on its psychological characteristics. Significant textured material shows that people with different moral attitudes develop brain sections in their own way. The discrepancies are insignificant, but are detected by detailed and in-depth research with the complex application of modern methods. From this it follows that individualists who adhere to the liberal idea of ​​“take everything from life” manifest themselves not only psychologically, but also physiologically.

Under high voltageAssociate Professor of the Department of General Psychology of the Moscow City Psychological and Pedagogical University, Tatyana Kuzmina, relying on extensive observations, showed that from the point of view of medical science, a terrorist has no nationality or even ideology. The psychological portrait of a suicide bomber or just an extremist is quite universal and is determined by a certain set of similar features of an individual, which determine his readiness for criminal self-sacrifice. Kuzmina stressed that recruiters do not use any special technologies. They work for vast masses in rather primitive ways, to which people morally and psychologically prepared to become terrorists react.

A great resonance and heated discussion was caused by the speech of the Director of the Center for Scientific and Political Thought and Ideology, Doctor of Physical, Mathematical and Political Sciences Stepan Sulakshin. In the report, “The Main Features of the Social Model of the Future,” he devoted considerable attention to analyzing the current state of Russian society in the context of the global situation, in particular, the country's participation in hostilities in Syria. And he tried to simulate the prospects for the development of our statehood for the next decade. In accordance with the forecast, internal tension will increase in our society within two to three years. This is already observed at present, despite the unconditional successes of the country's leadership in the foreign policy field. The president’s authority is growing, and society is fully supporting his initiatives. However, internal stress also increased (in arbitrary units by almost 30%). It is caused by unemployment, a decline in the standard of living of the population against the background of increasing incomes of bureaucrats and wealthy strata, a sense of instability and a gradual awareness by the main part of fellow citizens of the striking discrepancy between the vectors of the country's international activity and its policies in the economy, education, and medicine. Judging by the estimates, the level of tension in society is still low and amounts to about 25–28 percent of the critical level, at which spontaneous mass protests are possible that threaten to turn into a revolution. However, the situation will be aggravated, since effective stabilization measures in the country have not yet been taken. By 2018–2020, tensions can reach extremes. According to the forecast, Russia will inevitably expect big changes in the period from 2019 to 2022 - the question of the very existence of our country will be decided. During this period, the president will have to accept extremely difficult and at the same time historical decisions on the revision of the entire socio-economic system, as well as the organization of state governance in general. The general direction of the reforms in this critical period is most likely to be a return to the fundamental principles characteristic of the socialist system.

Russify science


Extremely interesting were the reports on the state of education in our country, as well as the entire social security system. Associate Professor of MGIMO, Candidate of Historical Sciences Olga Chetverikova and Chairwoman of the “Family, Love, Fatherland” movement Lyudmila Ryabichenko devoted their speeches to this issue. They pointed to the inadmissibility of subordination to the Western control of the sphere of national education and science. In particular, it was said that the leadership of a number of leading higher schools in Russia includes foreigners. In some universities, the posts of vice-rectors for science are replaced by citizens of the United States and Great Britain. And these are institutions that train specialists, including for the Russian defense industry. Noting that the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences had negative consequences, the speakers stated that the leading scientific centers were also led by citizens of other states pursuing a policy hostile towards Russia. In particular, one of the leaders of this sphere in Skolkovo is an American. It was also said that the assessment of the quality of scientific activity according to the citation criterion in foreign (mostly Western) literature actually contributes to the brain drain from Russia.

Chairman of the Presidium of the Movement for the Nationalization and Deprivatization of Strategic Resources Vladimir Filin pointed out that the law on advanced development territories, giving the right to head these entities to foreign citizens in conditions when the legislation of the Russian Federation within these regions can have limited application, leads to the sovereignization of such enclaves. And this is a threat to the integrity of the country.

On the whole, the congress passed under the sign of full approval of the foreign policy line of the Russian leadership with the recognition that domestic policy did not at all correspond to it, continuing in a number of key areas the Yeltsin-era line of subordination to Western control. This is especially unpleasant against the background of hopes placed by a large part of the world on Russia as the only real guarantor of the establishment of a monopolar world, which, in general opinion, is the main threat to humanity.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/28390
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. akmalinin
    akmalinin 9 December 2015 16: 47
    +1
    Who has a stronger army and rules the world
    1. Tor5
      Tor5 9 December 2015 16: 50
      0
      "On the whole, the congress passed under the sign of complete approval of the foreign policy line of the Russian leadership."
      But! It is not this congress that will defend Russia's interests if necessary ....
      1. 34 region
        34 region 9 December 2015 17: 29
        +1
        Yes. Congress gathered in the kitchen, discussed the situation in the world. But others make decisions. They have no real leverage to control the situation. A typical conversation over a glass of tea.
      2. Civil
        Civil 9 December 2015 18: 23
        +4
        You used to be on the sidelines - not against and not for
        But one day, Big Brother opened his eyes to you:
        The conspiracy of the ancient sages put the world on the brink
        Power is in the hands of strangers, and you pay them tribute!

        Void in the place of stars, fire around the cross
        Someone has cursed your people, and for good reason
        But the time will come X - and the colossus will come to life
        The stakes are too high, the game is serious

        Razor knife
        There will be a battle

        Fist - like a flag above a violent head
        The leader said: “We will take ours with interest!”
        In darkness the enemy will not be saved!
        It's time, get ready to take a step
        They will give you a sign!

        The mechanism is deftly started, the system goes after the system
        Alone you are nobody, but in the crowd - a hero

        You have your own colors, you know the formidable cry
        The wall in which you are a brick is indestructible!

        You could be born in completely different places
        Where there are no gratings, and do not build a block
        Where women don't cry and don't hide faces
        Where kids don't want to play killers ...

        The angel of death will be here when the battle begins
        He will push you with a bayonet and take you with him
        But again, Marsh plays, again the Leader yells ...
        And the columns of fools ascend to the altar!

        Fist - like a flag above a violent head
        The maniac said: - We’ll take it with interest!
        The enemy will not be saved in the darkness
        It's time, get ready to take a step
        They will give you a sign! ...trunk! ...flag! ...bayonet!
        ...sign! ... count! ...tank! ...chain!
        ...sign! ...scrap! ...whip! ...coffin! ...sign!

        Aria - They'll give you a sign - Song Lyrics
    2. Vend
      Vend 9 December 2015 16: 52
      +3
      Quote: akmalinin
      Who has a stronger army and rules the world

      This thesis comes from the depths of centuries. Change it and humanity would be happy. Yes, the nature of man is difficult to change. Who is stronger is right.
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 9 December 2015 22: 58
        +2
        Vend

        I want to argue with you.

        The army is already in 6th place in the system of governing the country, society, and the world.

        In the first place is the system of changing moral values. Changing the story can argue with the first place as well.
        All this is the source of the state educational system.

        Moral values ​​are a system of understanding. It is transmitted primarily from parents to children. You yourself know that juvenile justice makes serious restrictions in the process of parenting children.

        This can be discussed for a long time. To be brief, I’ll tell you how to distinguish creative morality from destructive one.

        Creative morality has the principle of collective interaction.

        Destructive morality is selfish.

        Only GENERAL, COMMON COMMON labor from a monkey made man.

        Your herd thinking liberal will say.

        Dvokh and Old Man have easier lives.

        Divide and rule.

        PS I respect Olga Chetverikova.
    3. 79807420129
      79807420129 9 December 2015 17: 00
      19
      Quote: akmalinin
      Who has a stronger army and rules the world

      But the army depends on the economy and the more successful the economy, the more successful the people, everything in this world is interconnected. I like the foreign policy of our state, but we also need to pay attention to domestic politics. Medved and his comrades Dvorkovich, Shuvalov, and other liberals continue to fool around. and not work for the country and people.
      1. AnpeL
        AnpeL 9 December 2015 17: 34
        +4
        The general direction of the reforms in this critical period is most likely to be a return to the fundamental principles characteristic of the socialist system.

        I always believed that the most acceptable variant of the social and economic system for Russia is socialism, with a limited share of the private sector in the economy.
        1. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 9 December 2015 21: 08
          +2
          That is, the Chinese version. All natural resources and their extraction, large-scale production, a large part of science and education should belong to the state, and small and medium-sized production, the market for services should belong to entrepreneurs. Then it will be possible to return the planned economy, the distortions of which can be easily compensated by the enterprising masses of the people. Masses with a capital letter because of respect for capable people.
          1. gladcu2
            gladcu2 9 December 2015 23: 35
            0
            sharp-lad

            You said it right. The ratio is approximately 75% state responsibility, 25% private.

            With such a balance, a socially balanced society is acceptable.
      2. Boos
        Boos 9 December 2015 18: 24
        +3
        Quote: 79807420129
        Quote: akmalinin
        Who has a stronger army and rules the world

        But the army depends on the economy and the more successful the economy, the more successful the people, everything in this world is interconnected. I like the foreign policy of our state, but we also need to pay attention to domestic politics. Medved and his comrades Dvorkovich, Shuvalov, and other liberals continue to fool around. and not work for the country and people.

        Write to Putin, he probably does not know about their tricks?
    4. sir
      sir 9 December 2015 17: 13
      -1
      probably still wrong am now money rules the world soldier
    5. 34 region
      34 region 9 December 2015 17: 26
      0
      Who has a more powerful economy and that rules the world. An army in a country with a weak economy cannot be strong. To make my economy powerful, I make my neighbors homeless and do not give people become. Here is a recipe for a strong western economy.
    6. onix757
      onix757 9 December 2015 18: 52
      +1
      False, the army is based on a strong economy, a healthy society and serves to protect them.
    7. Finntroll
      Finntroll 9 December 2015 20: 16
      0
      Alas, you are wrong. We had an Invincible and Legendary Army, but it didn’t help much in a difficult period. Who has money and the entire world financial elite, then turns the world around like on a propeller axis .... for now ....
  2. venaya
    venaya 9 December 2015 16: 47
    +7
    liberalism - advanced ideological echelon of fascism, since it justifies the right of an individual to claim exclusiveness and on this basis to suppress others.

    And how can one disagree with this key provision today? It is a pity that not many in the world have realized this yet.
  3. Air Force captain
    Air Force captain 9 December 2015 16: 49
    +2
    The prediction of Wangi ... it seems all the same comes true ....
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 9 December 2015 16: 52
      +3
      Quote: Air Force Captain
      it seems all the same comes true ....

      To live ... recourse
  4. Zenitchik
    Zenitchik 9 December 2015 17: 17
    +2
    Who has a stronger army and rules the world

    At the beginning of the 80s the USSR had such an army that it was like amers before Mars! However, the USSR capitulated in the Cold War, so it’s not so simple here ...
    1. 34 region
      34 region 9 December 2015 17: 34
      +1
      Yes. I have to admit. USSR stupidly sold. And they bombed him with money bombardments of command personnel. And no army saved from these bombings. What do we do?
    2. onix757
      onix757 9 December 2015 19: 13
      +2
      The USSR lived and developed for all 70 years under the sanction of the West, for the Russian Federation 5 years are critical in the presence of "partners" and an "integrated economy" smile
    3. Askin
      Askin 9 December 2015 19: 58
      +1
      Quote: Zenitchik
      Who has a stronger army and rules the world

      At the beginning of the 80s the USSR had such an army that it was like amers before Mars! However, the USSR capitulated in the Cold War, so it’s not so simple here ...

      The USSR had the 2nd economy in the world! This is where you have to start!
      There will be no economy - there will be no army!
      And tele-bombing about good Putin and bad ministers will soon stop working.
      I took hold of the ridge, do not say that it is not steep
  5. anfil
    anfil 9 December 2015 17: 22
    +1
    Before reformed:

    The reports on the state of education in our country, as well as the entire social security system, were extremely interesting. Associate professor of MGIMO, candidate of historical sciences Olga Chetverikova and chairman of the movement "Family, Love, Fatherland" Lyudmila Ryabichenko devoted their speeches to this issue. They pointed out the inadmissibility of subordinating the sphere of national education and science to Western control. In particular, it was said that The leadership of a number of leading higher schools in Russia includes foreigners. In some universities, the posts of vice-rectors for science are replaced by citizens of the United States and Great Britain. And these are institutions that train specialists, including for the Russian defense industry. Noting that the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences had negative consequences, the speakers stated that leading research centers are led by citizens of other states pursuing a policy hostile to Russia. In particular, one of the leaders in this area in Skolkovo is an American. It was also said that an assessment of the quality of scientific activity by the citation criterion in foreign (mainly Western) literature actually contributes to the brain drain from Russia.


    1. 34 region
      34 region 9 December 2015 17: 39
      0
      Before reformed. belay At the end of the article, in general, the prospect will be smacked (in quotation marks). Advanced development regions are the first to exit the country. hi
  6. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 9 December 2015 17: 24
    +4
    There are quite interesting thoughts in this article! To partially relieve the possible internal tension of society, it is necessary to maximize the potential of the population. People must be busy with something. Problems arise due to lack of work and money. Of course there will always be idlers and whiners, but those who want to be in demand should be such the task of the state. Second point: there should be a very active foreign policy aimed at the economic development of the country. Education should also take steady, even steps in all segments of the population. This is essentially a huge system that allows you to build a society in the right direction. This is a very difficult and feasible task. . And the state should work dynamically in all directions! Only then can a stable patriotic society be built that loves its country and its government.
  7. epsilon571
    epsilon571 9 December 2015 17: 53
    +5
    I have highlighted this excerpt from the article. It is this endurance that the ruling structures of Russia should repeat today as a mantra, every day, every hour of their existence. The people see everything, it cannot be deceived and substituted, and whoever does not understand this will be wiped off the face of the Russian land!

    However, internal stress also increased (in arbitrary units by almost 30%). It is caused by unemployment, a decline in the standard of living of the population against the background of increasing incomes of bureaucrats and wealthy strata, a sense of instability and a gradual awareness by the main part of fellow citizens of the striking discrepancy between the vectors of the country's international activity and its policies in the economy, education, and medicine. Judging by the estimates, the level of tension in society is still low and amounts to about 25–28 percent of the critical level, at which spontaneous mass protests are possible that threaten to turn into a revolution. However, the situation will be aggravated, since effective stabilization measures in the country have not yet been taken. By 2018–2020, tensions can reach extremes. According to the forecast, Russia will inevitably expect big changes in the period from 2019 to 2022 - the question of the very existence of our country will be decided. During this period, the president will have to take extremely difficult and at the same time historical decisions to revise the entire socio-economic system, as well as the organization of state governance as a whole. The general direction of the reforms in this critical period is most likely to be a return to the fundamental principles characteristic of the socialist system.
  8. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 9 December 2015 18: 05
    +1
    According to the forecast, Russia will inevitably expect big changes in the period from 2019 to 2022 - the question of the very existence of our country will be decided. During this period, the president will have to take extremely difficult and at the same time historical decisions to revise the entire socio-economic system, as well as the organization of state governance in general.
    And I really thought until the 37th I have to wait again! Or maybe speed up the process, so as not to arrange a relapse?
    1. onix757
      onix757 9 December 2015 19: 07
      0
      Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev commented on an investigation by the opposition anti-corruption fund (FBK) Aleksei Navalny about the business of the family of the Russian prosecutor general, Yuri Chaika. The statement was made on the air "Russia 1" during an interview that the head of the Cabinet gave reporters leading television channels.
      “Such investigations were, are and will be, the main thing is that they are based on objective data,” Medvedev recalled. At the same time, he warned the public against accusing officials on the basis of unverified publications, which are often custom-made.
      “You said that a particular person was charged,” he said, answering a question. - Listen, if we are in such a coordinate system, we will go very far. Then there will be the 30s at best, ”the prime minister emphasized, referring to the period of the 1930s, when the authorities practiced checks and arrests based on not always reliable and reasonable reports.
  9. B.T.V.
    B.T.V. 9 December 2015 18: 14
    +6
    "We have learned to fly in the sky like birds, we have learned to swim under water like fish, the most important thing remains: to learn to live on earth like people." Bernard Show

    It is difficult to disagree with this, given what was said in the 40s of the last century, and we still cannot learn how to live like people.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 9 December 2015 21: 18
      0
      It is very difficult to disagree with this statement! If people sent all their destructive energy to creation, paradise on earth would not seem like a pipe dream!
  10. guzik007
    guzik007 10 December 2015 13: 31
    0
    Great social changes await Russia from 2019 to 2022, when the question of the very existence of our country will be decided ”
    -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
    -----------------
    Well, how did you have to steer the country for 15 years to come to such a conclusion, huh?
    Stalin’s pre-war speech to the Supreme Congress comes to mind when he declared that the USSR had finally taken place as a state and there was no way back.
    I can not vouch for verbatim, but for the meaning -100%.