Military Review

Air defense forces in Kamchatka replenished with six Pantsir-S complexes

36
The air defense units of the Eastern District of Kamchatka received six “Pantsir-S” air defense missiles, reports RIA News message of the representative of the TSO Alexander Gordeev.




“Pantsir-S” is a Russian ground-based self-propelled anti-aircraft missile-gun complex (ZRPK). It is intended for short-range protection of civilian and military targets (including long-range air defense systems) from all modern means of air attack. The complex can also protect the defended object from various threats. It is used for air defense of the most important small-sized military and industrial facilities, units and formations of ground forces, as well as for strengthening air defense forces at low and extremely low altitudes from massive air strikes. ”- recalled Gordeev.

According to him, “the main feature of the complex is that in a matter of seconds it can detect and destroy any aircraft, helicopter, drone, guided bombs or enemy ballistic missiles.”

The officer noted that in the summer of this year, the air defense units in Kamchatka took to combat duty on the C-400 air defense system, which had been replaced by C-300.

Air defense forces in Kamchatka replenished with six Pantsir-S complexes
Photos used:
RIA News. Evgeny Biyatov
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. alex-s
    alex-s 3 December 2015 09: 19 New
    0
    Interestingly, and cruise missiles can shoot down?
    1. Dembel77
      Dembel77 3 December 2015 09: 26 New
      +2
      This is a universal weapon. It can work for any purpose. Including ground. Of course with skillful handling. The defense is getting stronger and it pleases.
      1. crazyrom
        crazyrom 3 December 2015 20: 13 New
        0
        Nightmare, according to the icon (2) the sleeve flies away with the bullet ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Falcon
      Falcon 3 December 2015 09: 40 New
      +3
      Quote: alex-s
      Interestingly, and cruise missiles can shoot down?


      Designed for air defense of small-sized military and administrative-industrial facilities and areas from aircraft, helicopters, cruise missiles and high-precision weapons, guided aerial bombs and remotely piloted vehicles, as well as to strengthen air defense groupings when repelling massive air attack strikes and ensuring the destruction of lightly armored objects.
    4. i80186
      i80186 3 December 2015 09: 42 New
      +2
      Quote: alex-s
      Interestingly, and cruise missiles can shoot down?

      This is just the main goal. By 2017, they promise to train the ballistic goals as well.
    5. kugu
      kugu 3 December 2015 10: 15 New
      0
      Quote: alex-s
      Interestingly, and cruise missiles can shoot down?

      In fact yes.
      But if you look at the characteristics. Well, dream up, well, cleanly, for example, a tomahawk flies.
      Tomahawk is rather slow (3-5 times slower than the shell can), but it flies above the surface. Here we look at the capabilities of the 30-36km radar. But is it unlikely that the earth? After all, if you google what a horizon is (not a TV), it turns out, purely from the point of view of geometry, in order to see a low flying (not creeping) target at a distance of 30 km you need to go up to a height of 50 m (15 storey building). Otherwise, it will be necessary to "shine through" the earth's firmament.
      Well i.e. for 30km of his own radar, he will not be able to detect a tomahawk.
      If we assume that our own radar is at a height of 4m (with a margin), then the range will be 7-8km. And this is if we assume that the earth is a geometric ball. Without hills, forests and even dunes.
      In short, there is very little time for reaction and aiming. Especially if the rocket flies exactly where the shell, and not past).

      If the Shell will not use its own radar (it seems to be able to), then most likely there will be more powerful means in such an integrated air defense network (S-300-350-400).
      And if you take into account the range of the shell, then giving him targets with "adult" radars is simply not interesting. Imagine that a rocket flies, you have defined its path and see that it will soon enter the radius of the shell (20km). You give the shell target designation, but here the rocket changes course and is not included in the action radius (even if it partially passes through the zone, it still takes time to launch and catch up).
      There may already be no time left to reassign a target to another complex.

      In general, I'm not special. But logically, it’s impossible to bring down serious CRs with shells.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 3 December 2015 10: 29 New
        +4
        Quote: kugu
        If the Shell will not use its own radar (it seems to be able to), then most likely there will be more powerful means in such an integrated air defense network (S-300-350-400).

        As a rule, the Shells work in tandem with C-300 / 350 / 400, since the C-300 / 350 / 400 complexes have restrictions on the smallest distance to the target. It is this zone, at the near approaches, that is covered by the Shell.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 3 December 2015 10: 42 New
          +6
          Quote: NEXUS
          As a rule, the Shells work in tandem with C-300 / 350 / 400, since the C-300 / 350 / 400 complexes have restrictions on the smallest distance to the target. It is this zone, at the near approaches, that is covered by the Shell.

          Andrey, you are in many ways right yes But I will take the liberty of correcting you a little. hi
          Currently, the C-300P, as a rule, does not hide under anything, except for the “cover” of the heavy machine guns DShK in the back of a Kamaz or Ural and MANPADS.
          The medium-range air defense system C-350 has not yet been adopted. The end of his test is scheduled for the end of 2015. In reality, in the best situation, he can enter the troops only through the 2-3 of the year.
          And the rest is all right. hi
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 3 December 2015 10: 56 New
            +3
            Quote: Bongo
            Currently, the C-300P, as a rule, does not hide under anything, except for the “cover” of the heavy machine guns DShK in the back of a Kamaz or Ural and MANPADS.

            Here I completely agree with you, Sergey, the Shells have just begun to enter the troops and are desperately lacking. But it seems that the Tunguska air defense system is being modernized. Maybe this will fix the situation a little.
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 3 December 2015 10: 59 New
              +6
              Quote: NEXUS
              ZPRK Tunguska. Perhaps this will fix the situation a little.

              ZRPK "Tunguska" - these are air defense systems of the Ground Forces. In the anti-aircraft missile units of the aerospace forces they are not. request
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 3 December 2015 11: 05 New
                +2
                Quote: Bongo
                ZRPK "Tunguska" - these are air defense systems of the Ground Forces. In the anti-aircraft missile units of the aerospace forces they are not.

                This is known to me. But in all honesty, the Tunguska is better than MANPADS or DShK. And I honestly do not understand this moment. Why would the MO not "attach" the Tungusks to the S-300 complexes for a while, until they equip all the air defense divisions S-300/400 Carapace.
                1. Bongo
                  Bongo 3 December 2015 11: 15 New
                  +5
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  This is known to me. But in all honesty, Tunguska is better than MANPADS or DShKs.

                  Of course, you should not even compare! yes
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  Why don't the MO attach the Tungusks to the C-300 complexes for a time, until they equip all the S-300 / 400 air defense divisions with armor.

                  The fact is that in the air defense units of the Tungusok ground forces there is clearly not enough. Especially in the Eastern Military District. Here we still operate Shilka, as well as the very worn-out air defense systems Osa and Strela-10, the production of which missiles were discontinued more than 20 years ago. Previously, there were still “Cubes”, but they have already been written off. There is a different trend. Not so long ago, several brigades of military S-300V and Buk were transferred to the Air Defense Forces. Not from a good life, of course, this is due to the cancellation of the early C-300P and the need to replace them with something.
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 3 December 2015 11: 23 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Bongo
                    Here we still operate Shilka

                    ZSU Shilka trying to upgrade ... albeit an old "apparatus" wink , but even against armored personnel carriers in Syria (if sclerosis does not change) it works very successfully. But the problem of this ZSU is weak armor protection. hi
                    1. Bongo
                      Bongo 3 December 2015 11: 28 New
                      +3
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      ZSU Shika trying to upgrade ... albeit an old "apparatus"

                      Not for the Russian army, these are offers for foreign customers. They will leave soon with us.
      2. Falcon
        Falcon 3 December 2015 10: 35 New
        +3
        Quote: kugu
        Here we look at the capabilities of the 30-36km radar. But is it unlikely that the earth? After all, if you google what a horizon is (not a TV), then it turns out, purely from the point of view of geometry, in order to see a low flying (not creeping) target at a distance of 30km you need to go up to a height of 50m (15 storey building). Otherwise, you have to "shine through" the earth's firmament.
        Well i.e. for 30km of his own radar, he will not be able to detect a tomahawk.


        The reasoning is correct - but the conclusion is not entirely.

        Tomahawk is not crawling on the ground. Although it flies low, but still not quite. Depends on the terrain. Altitude may be 50-100m. those. and a decent horizon.
        1. kugu
          kugu 4 December 2015 01: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: Falcon


          The reasoning is correct - but the conclusion is not entirely.

          Tomahawk is not crawling on the ground. Although it flies low, but still not quite. Depends on the terrain. Altitude may be 50-100m. those. and a decent horizon.


          I agree, the radio horizon is much further, even if the target is at 50m. But, it seems to me, most of it will just eat the relief.
          He works against both the hunter and the victim)
          But straight 7-8km of course is unlikely to be, most likely, more.
    6. NEXUS
      NEXUS 3 December 2015 10: 25 New
      +2
      Quote: alex-s
      Interestingly, and cruise missiles can shoot down?

      In fact, the Pantsir-S complex was created specifically for the interception of the Kyrgyz Republic. hi
    7. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 3 December 2015 11: 18 New
      +1
      It was they who were set up to cover the S-400 regiment (three divisions instead of two, as everywhere), 2 armor per division. They arrived late, I thought they immediately went bundled with the S-400 in the summer.
  2. polite people
    polite people 3 December 2015 09: 21 New
    +2
    This is so that China and Japan remember us and do not relax. And they knew that we would not give a piece of our Russian land to anyone. soldier
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 3 December 2015 10: 19 New
      +4
      Quote: polite people
      This is to China and Japan

      Open the map and see where Kamchatka and where China
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 4 December 2015 02: 35 New
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Open the map and see where Kamchatka and where China

        Well, people do not look at the scale of the maps, or they think that 2 versts in the West are equal to 200 vests in the Far East. We have missiles flying longer and machine guns for 20 versts.
  3. Gandelman
    Gandelman 3 December 2015 09: 21 New
    +2
    It looks like some kind of terminator, awesome. and on the enemy infantry can work?
    1. Falcon
      Falcon 3 December 2015 09: 29 New
      0
      Quote: Gandelman
      It looks like some kind of terminator, awesome. and on the enemy infantry can work?


      Of course - it is universal
    2. vkl-47
      vkl-47 3 December 2015 09: 30 New
      +1
      if only in manual mode anti-aircraft guns.
      1. Falcon
        Falcon 3 December 2015 09: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: vkl-47
        if only in manual mode anti-aircraft guns.


        Radio command missile guidance from him.
        I think it’s quite possible with a rocket
    3. sa-zz
      sa-zz 3 December 2015 10: 20 New
      0
      Quote: Gandelman
      and on the enemy infantry can work?

      even for tanks, even for planes, for all purposes representing a threat to the territory of the Russian Federation and its allies.
  4. Svarog5570
    Svarog5570 3 December 2015 09: 28 New
    0
    correctly you need to fully re-equip our army with modern technology
  5. TT62
    TT62 3 December 2015 09: 31 New
    +1
    About a ballistic missile, of course, "bent", but to get into a warhead on the final trajectory will certainly be able to. Hit, and perhaps a little bit to change the accuracy of this warhead.
  6. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 3 December 2015 09: 40 New
    0
    On the Aleutian Islands, the Americans are either settled .. Whoever flies there! So there is someone to defend from there! Everywhere robbers and bandits threaten socialist property! angry
  7. Bongo
    Bongo 3 December 2015 09: 43 New
    +2
    The officer noted that in the summer of this year, the air defense units in Kamchatka took to combat duty on the C-400 air defense system, which had been replaced by C-300.

    As far as I know, the process of setting C-400 to the database was somewhat delayed. Of the three C-400 deployed near Vilyuchinsk in September 2015, only one was launched in parallel with the C-300PS in September 1 (in the picture). Apparently, the Pantsir-S400 complexes will cover the long-range S-XNUMX police from strikes from low altitudes.
  8. Zomanus
    Zomanus 3 December 2015 09: 43 New
    0
    Kamchatka is not the Kuril Islands.
    Here it would stick and air defense and FFP.
    And the armor in Kamchatka will cover the C-400,
    which were deployed there earlier.
  9. amba balamut 77
    amba balamut 77 3 December 2015 10: 16 New
    0
    From air defense we have: S-400, S-300, now there are Armor, in Yelizovo are MiG-31s. They promise to send the Su-30.
  10. atamankko
    atamankko 3 December 2015 10: 40 New
    -1
    But Japan is not worried?
    1. amba balamut 77
      amba balamut 77 3 December 2015 10: 45 New
      +1
      And what do we care about her diarrhea.
  11. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 3 December 2015 11: 23 New
    0
    As I understand it, the latest weapons should be kept secret.
    If such air defense systems are on public display, then what about the latest developments!
  12. nik1321
    nik1321 3 December 2015 12: 17 New
    0
    an interesting thing is the carapace - but one thing is bad, the range is small of course .. it would be nice to try to use unmanned aerial vehicles (if you need to develop it) as a means of detection and guidance for several shells at once .. like for artillery, target illumination and its exact coordinates. Of course I'm not special in these matters, but as a thought, why not.
  13. Gunther
    Gunther 3 December 2015 12: 48 New
    +1
    kugu Quote:
    Generally yes. But if you look at the characteristics. Well dream up, well, purely, for example, a tomahawk flies. A tomahawk is rather slow (3-5 times slower than the shell can), but it flies above the surface. Here we look at the capabilities of the 30-36km radar. But is it unlikely that the earth? After all, if you google what a horizon is (not a TV), then it turns out, purely from the point of view of geometry, in order to see a low flying (not creeping) target at a distance of 30 km you need to go up to a height of 50 m (15 storey building). Otherwise, it will be necessary to "shine through" the earth's firmament. Well, i.e. for 30km of his own radar he t

    Fantasy is good)))
    “Shell-C1” can work both independently and in joint combat mode and is part of the hierarchical structure of the mixed group with the obligatory submission to the higher KP group. Depending on the composition of the grouping and the task to be solved, the KP of the anti-aircraft missile brigade (group), the anti-aircraft missile regiment, the anti-aircraft missile battalion of the long-range (medium) range system, and the RTV commando can act as a higher command post.
    All complexes are in constant interaction with each other and if several complexes form a battery, then one of them will automatically become a command post. The command machine computer makes all decisions and passes directions to others. First of all, it is necessary for tracking and destroying targets. The command center distributes the targets between the complexes, or if the target alone orders the destruction to that complex, which is located in a more favorable position at the time of the enemy attack.
    For firing at ground targets and targets, flying at extremely low altitudes, uses an optical electronic system (ECO) tracking targets and missiles. ECO is located at autonomous optical post (AOP), which allows you to direct the optical axis of the ECO according to the signals of the central computing system (CVS) to the target in the range of angles: azimuth -90 °, elevation - from -5 ° to + 82 °. The ECO allows additional target search according to target designation data from the central computer and automatic target capture for auto tracking.
    Auto tracking range (with a meteorological range of 10 km) is:
    F-16 aircraft - 17-26km;
    PRR HARM - 13-15km;
    KR ALCM - 11-14km.
    http://dokwar.ru/publ/vooruzhenie/pvo_i_rvsn/zenitnyj_raketno_pushechnyj_komplek
    s_zrpk_pancir_s1/16-1-0-186
    PS
    We examined several years ago the flaws of the complex on the basis of the report "Assessment of the characteristics of the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system", since then the designers corrected the flaws)))
  14. prorab_ak
    prorab_ak 3 December 2015 13: 28 New
    +2
    According to him, “the main feature of the complex is that in a matter of seconds it can detect and destroy any aircraft, helicopter, drones, guided air bombs or enemy ballistic missiles”
    Strongly said .... about ballistic missiles ... and these are the words of the representative of the Ministry of Defense. Mdaaa ....