In Russia, in the first reading, a law was adopted, allowing the Constitutional Court to not execute individual decisions of the ECHR

79
In the State Duma, in 1 reading, a bill was passed allowing the Constitutional Court "to recognize decisions of international courts, primarily the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), if they contradict the Russian Constitution as inappropriate," informs TASS.

In Russia, in the first reading, a law was adopted, allowing the Constitutional Court to not execute individual decisions of the ECHR


The initiators of the project are the heads of all factions led by the head of the committee on constitutional legislation, Vladimir Pligin.

Amendments to the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court stipulate that “at the request of the federal executive body vested with the competence to protect the interests of the Russian Federation when considering in an interstate body for the protection of human rights and freedoms, complaints filed against the Russian Federation on the basis of an international treaty, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation resolves the possibility of executing a decision of an interstate body for the protection of human rights and freedoms ”, the explanatory note says

According to Pligin, "the competence for such appeals to the Constitutional Court is vested in the President of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Russian Federation."

“If the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation adopts a resolution on the impossibility of executing a decision of an interstate body for the protection of human rights and freedoms, any actions (acts) aimed at the execution of its corresponding decision in Russia cannot be carried out (adopted),” the document says .

“The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force and, thus, it has an undoubted priority,” said Pligin, introducing the bill. “No one will cancel this position.”

He noted that "the draft law does not cause any damage to investment activity or the protection of private property (in Russia)."

“Cases of possible non-fulfillment or reference to the assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation will undoubtedly be of a single character,” the parliamentarian stressed.
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +32
    2 December 2015 10: 37
    Swing for a long time. But it’s already good.
    1. +33
      2 December 2015 10: 40
      the return of sovereignty is a necessary thing.
      1. +22
        2 December 2015 10: 46
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        the return of sovereignty is a necessary thing.

        I would say vital.
        1. +12
          2 December 2015 11: 05
          The ECtHR can dictate to members of the geyropsoyuz. We are not members.
          Does the ECHR side with us on a downward path, or am I not up to something? request
          1. +7
            2 December 2015 11: 11
            Quote: Balu
            The ECtHR can dictate to members of the geyropsoyuz. We are not members.
            Does the ECHR side with us on a downward path, or am I not up to something?

            Its jurisdiction extends to members of the Council of Europe, which includes Russia.
            1. 0
              2 December 2015 11: 33
              Accepted, thanks. hi
              1. 0
                2 December 2015 13: 40
                It wouldn’t be easier to just amend the constitution. Or can the constitutional court ignore the decisions of the ECHR, but not the other courts? It turns out that only articles of the constitution remain under protection, but our Eurohumanoids can release a person convicted of a criminal article. But in the constitution, after all, only rights are spelled out, and responsibility is spelled out in other laws.
            2. Tor5
              +1
              2 December 2015 12: 31
              Is this the advice in which our powers have been suspended for more than a year? Oh well... .
            3. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          2 December 2015 12: 58
          Still used capital in Russia returned ..
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. +8
        2 December 2015 10: 54
        I agree, I must step on!
        Now the wave of the Anglo.USA-human rights defenders info war will begin even steeper: Russia refuses to respect human rights!
        Putin is a dictator! Tyrant! Worse than Stalin!
        1. +4
          2 December 2015 11: 21
          Quote: Baikonur
          Putin is a dictator! Tyrant! Worse than Stalin!

          ...It's better! better than Stalin ...
          "... and don't make yourself a smart face! You're an officer ..." (do not take it personally ...)
      3. +3
        2 December 2015 11: 08
        Even the prosecutor general (!) Repeatedly spoke out against the priority of international law over national laws.
        And this is the official state level.
        Although note that the opposition was. Yet in power now the primacy of international law on sovereign is maintained.

        But it is better to call a spade a spade: not an international LAW, but only agreed RULES of behavior (and they are circumvented and violated by the stronger with impunity).
        The apparatus of coercion and the definition of dispositions and sanctions in this area are not enough to the level of law. And it’s absolutely no more perfect, even in comparison with the national one. I think so.
        1. +2
          2 December 2015 11: 37
          Quote: SibSlavRus
          But it is better to call a spade a spade: not an international LAW, but only agreed RULES of behavior (and they are circumvented and violated by the stronger with impunity).

          good Moreover, in order to please these rules, we voluntarily surrender part of our sovereignty, and sometimes this happens in violation of our own Constitution. Now they’re just finalizing the mechanism for observing the country's basic law — and they’re doing it right, though late.
          1. KVS
            0
            2 December 2015 22: 14
            there is only one problem ...
            the basic law of the country has long been no longer respected even by courts of general jurisdiction ...
            the chairman of the Constitutional Court Zorkin has repeatedly stated this ...
            and the existing laws are interpreted as "the drawbar, as you turn it, so it happened" ...
            the initiative is good, if only for non-compliance with internal laws they will be punished right up to execution regardless of their ranks and positions ... then there will be order ... and they deprived people of the last opportunity to achieve justice ...
        2. 0
          2 December 2015 12: 50
          "priority of international law" stop
          Yes there is no such thing, it does not exist in nature - there is international treaty priority(this was also the case in the Constitution of the USSR) after the signing of which there is ratification (approval in force), at the same time (or rather, before signing), a check is carried out for compliance with the Constitution and national legislation.

          The decisions of the ECHR are binding on us because we are members of the Council of Europe and upon entering agreed to abide by its decisions. But these decisions are not international law.
          To make it clear, the decision of our district court is strictly necessary for execution by all: state bodies, legal entities, citizens, etc. But at the same time it has no legislative power and does not create a precedent. They can be appealed, etc.
          So with the ECHR, their decisions, since we adopted their rules of the game, are binding on every specific occasionally - not binding on other cases (not valid right).
          Having exited these agreements, we lose the right to appeal to international courts ... Therefore, in the case of the Mistral, for example, we would lose the right to sue.
          Another question is how effectively we use this right ...
          1. -1
            2 December 2015 13: 01
            does not exist in nature

            does not exist in nature

            Those. for 5-7 years, people learn a law that does not exist in nature? Locksmiths and plumbers decided that it did not exist. We need to tell the peasants, at least they are laughing.
            we would lose the right to sue

            Stop writing it immediately! I feel bad from your legal nihilism. The ECHR is only part of this supranational structure for regulating relations between state institutions. About the UN International Court of Justice, the UN International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, the Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Court of Justice of the EU, the Supreme Court of the African Union, as well as specialized courts for special categories of international disputes, for example, to resolve disputes in the field of pollution control, disputes in the system GATT / WTO, investment disputes, etc. of course you have not heard. By the way, in the case of especially wooden countries, such as ours, the ad hoc rule applies, which allows you to create a court for a specific case.
            1. 0
              2 December 2015 14: 52
              You forgot to mention "public judgment". Dixi.
            2. +1
              2 December 2015 18: 33
              Well, if you study for 7 years, it’s probably going hard ...
              Give a codified example of INTERNATIONAL LAW, very interesting ...
              SMGS and stuff not to offer
              And at the same time explain why the decisions of the above courts are binding on us - simply because they publish international law (some kind of abstract?) Or because we joined and / or directly participated in their creation
              Also explain the binding enforcement of court decisions for non-aligned countries.
              If not difficult ..
              At the same time, it will be more understandable for locksmiths with plumbers on the VO ...
      4. Tor5
        +2
        2 December 2015 12: 30
        Still to return the death penalty for terrorists, murderers, rapists and corrupt officials, and even with the confiscation of everything!
        1. -2
          2 December 2015 13: 16
          The State Duma will not accept laws against themselves sic!
      5. +2
        2 December 2015 12: 38
        Quote: c-Petrov
        the return of sovereignty is a necessary thing.



        Only it is necessary to bring it to the end and not stop half way.
        1. 0
          2 December 2015 12: 45
          Quote: cniza
          Only it is necessary to bring it to the end and not stop half way.

          And it’s high time to nationalize the central bank.
    2. +24
      2 December 2015 10: 41
      Thank God it's time! All of their courts are simply fictitious, or rather, they are courts for Russia! The Yukos affair is a vivid confirmation of this!
      1. +5
        2 December 2015 10: 59
        Their courts are gangsters.
        1. 0
          2 December 2015 11: 29
          Quote: bornikrub
          Their courts are gangsters.

          Watch American cinema - how are court hearings? Loyers (lawyers) are stocked with links, extracts, precedents, ... and the laws themselves - dozens of thick volumes with amendments, interpretations (interpretations? ...) and explanations ...
          As a result, who will chat with whom; he’ll either buy the jury ... or he will frighten the judge ... The objectivity of the crime as a socially dangerous act is leveled - well, the looser made a mistake, will no longer do that (today! ...), we will regret, forgive, reproach and ... reward .. . (in any order, you can repeatedly ...)
          1. 0
            2 December 2015 13: 07
            There is no legislative system in our understanding, there a precedent system works with a small number of statutes. And the lawyers there are not called loers, as we commonly call here, but attony et lo. And their entire establishment (read thieves) uses their courts, so everything is fine.
      2. +2
        2 December 2015 12: 18
        You forgot to mention the international court and tribunal in The Hague (example, Former Yugoslavia). That's where the trial was!
        The accused and witnesses there do not even live to see the verdict. The leadership and the citizens of the crowded NATO countries are also being judged.
        There are not even double, but triple standards.
        For example, Carla del Ponte (prosecutor for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda) was silent for 5 years about the atrocities of the Albanians in Kosovo, and then she released the book and repented! But the Bosnian Serbs mixed with mud. And there are many such corrupt hypocrites there.
        International chimera, not law!
    3. +15
      2 December 2015 10: 53
      This must be done a long time ago, but better late than never. Actually, it is necessary to change the entire colonial Yeltsin constitution. I imagine how liberals and grant-eaters will conquer now.
    4. +7
      2 December 2015 11: 04
      Now some Helsinki group led by the old senile Alekseeva and other grant-eating shobla will whimper about the terrible genocide of the Russians! At the same time, like lousy jackals howling at the moon, they will obsequiously stretch their dead necks towards the American embassy in Moscow, hoping for a handout! laughing
    5. 0
      2 December 2015 11: 10
      This law should have been passed a long time ago, to the delight of our "Masonic partners" and their henchmen in Russia.
      1. 0
        2 December 2015 13: 08
        Based on the context of your application, it turns out that the Law is directed against the Russian Federation? or how?
    6. 0
      2 December 2015 11: 20
      Quote: vsoltan
      Swing for a long time. But it’s already good.

      HALLELUJAH!!! We begin to throw off the slave chains of "democracy" !!! fellow
      1. +1
        2 December 2015 13: 29
        Partner!!!
        I do not need your Freedom!
        And yes! I do not need her,
        freedom to be a parent-1
        when my country is in trouble
        Freedom for you "partner"
        get into my wife’s underpants
        into my wallet, into the brains of my children ...
        But what about me?
        Never mind!!!
        God gave me free will, souls fly
        and the noise is birch and the laughter of my children
        wealth of the bowels and space
        wheat yellow seas
        and this is my homeland.
    7. +1
      2 December 2015 12: 57
      Bravo to Parliament fellow Bravo good
    8. +1
      2 December 2015 13: 39
      The news is extremely positive and I will paraphrase a little: A small step for the State Duma, a big step for the Fatherland. And it took only some 15 years, and also the war in Ukraine, the downed Su-24 and the lives of two soldiers .... Slowly, very slowly! Time is now EVERYTHING in absolute terms. But alas and ah, we still allow ourselves to be scattered about, spending it on how the Police or the Police are right, or how many time zones our country needs and what time it is better for us to live. We are still just talking about the policy of import substitution (let's not talk about the military-industrial complex, there is more or less at least something being done) ...
  2. +8
    2 December 2015 10: 39
    Well, finally it happened. We should expect a howling Liberals terrible howl)))
  3. +6
    2 December 2015 10: 39
    Finally they decided. It is high time.
  4. +2
    2 December 2015 10: 40
    In this regard, a question-send Khodorkovsky, or will he "suck" us? it would be desirable to be more specific ...
  5. +6
    2 December 2015 10: 41
    Such laws must be adopted immediately in three readings. A few years ago.
    1. +3
      2 December 2015 10: 57
      Quote: Mikhail M
      Michael m Today, 10: 41 New
      Such laws must be adopted immediately in three readings. A few years ago


      As far as I know, there was an attempt at the beginning of 2000 ... shook (((((
  6. +6
    2 December 2015 10: 41
    Oh, now the fifth column will scream - we are returning to the lawless Middle Ages, where the strong one is always right. Have we ever come out of it?
  7. +6
    2 December 2015 10: 42
    The ECHR, of course, is good, but for me, so in Russia, its laws, in particular, spiritual education are not an example higher than the European one.
  8. +8
    2 December 2015 10: 45
    "allowing the Constitutional Court" to declare unenforceable decisions of international courts, primarily the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)"...

    Here it is necessary not to talk about the ECHR first of all, but about the Hague international court ... The ECHR has now awarded us somewhere 1,2 - 1,5 lard, but Hague in the Yukos case - either 30, or 50 lard ( I don’t remember already) ...

    And the decision of the Constitutional Court was caused precisely by these cases, but specifically for some reason, the Resolution of the Constitutional Court refers precisely to the decision of the ECHR ...

    It’s time to remove from the Constitution of the Russian Federation an article on the priority and supremacy of international law ...

    Journalists did not emphasize that it was in the Yukos case (30-50 lard) that there was no concrete court decision ... But in vain ... It turns out that they did not notice the elephant ...
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 11: 02
      Most likely, most journalists approve of the supremacy of international law:
      in their midst, liberal-selling still prevails.
  9. +5
    2 December 2015 10: 45
    He noted that "the draft law does not cause any damage to investment activity or to protect frequent property (in Russia)."
    “Cases of possible non-fulfillment or reference to the assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation will undoubtedly be of a single character,” the parliamentarian stressed.

    Do not forget to say, kindly, sir.
    “The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force and, therefore, it has an undeniable priority,
    Well, that's right. It was necessary to begin with this.
  10. +5
    2 December 2015 10: 46
    Quote: c-Petrov
    the return of sovereignty is a necessary thing.

    That's right. And it seems that the process has begun. Now we still need to save the Central Bank of the Russian Federation from the dictatorship and submission of the Fed.
  11. +4
    2 December 2015 10: 46
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    the return of sovereignty is a necessary thing.

    We also need the return of economic sovereignty - to remove the article on the central bank from the constitution.
  12. 0
    2 December 2015 10: 46
    Our laws are almost good, only judges are bad. And sometimes, an international court may be fairer than homegrown. And on the other hand, now only the lazy one is not trying to bite Russia, slander or put a bullet in the back. So that there is no definite answer and only hope of God's judgment remains.
  13. +1
    2 December 2015 10: 46
    It’s a matter of this law, if Article 15 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus says: "... 4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law , then the rules of the international treaty apply. "
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 11: 22
      Quote: sa-ag
      if Article 15 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus says: "..

      It’s always surprising that newcomers to Sait’s visitors from foreign countries always know the constitution of the Russian Federation better than ourselves. And what is especially surprising is that they know only our constitution, since they are not interested in their own.
      Yes Saag, my foreign "friend". Don't pay for knowledge of their constitution, right?
      1. -2
        2 December 2015 12: 06
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Do not pay for the knowledge of their constitution, huh?

        Like the deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation :-)
        1. 0
          2 December 2015 15: 49
          Quote: sa-ag
          Like the deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation :-)

          You often look after your deputies, but in our house we will figure it out.
  14. +2
    2 December 2015 10: 47
    I feel that by 2018 there will be an awesome gift - the new Constitution.
    1. +4
      2 December 2015 10: 54
      Maybe to 2017? And not only the Constitution.
      1. +1
        2 December 2015 11: 32
        Quote: avva2012
        Maybe to 2017? And not only the Constitution.

        ... by 2017? ..
        Symbolically! ...
    2. 0
      2 December 2015 11: 03
      Quote: Flinky
      I feel that by 2018 there will be an awesome gift - the new Constitution.

      With an 8 year term of president? laughing
  15. +3
    2 December 2015 10: 47
    It is high time to equate the ECHR with the district courts of general jurisdiction ... not a big bird to put the COP on the scales.)
  16. +2
    2 December 2015 10: 52
    Oh, we are waiting for the howl of the liberals. Whoever bought the headphones is to blame.
    1. +2
      2 December 2015 11: 05
      Quote: Wedmak
      Oh, we are waiting for the howl of the liberals. Whoever bought the headphones is to blame.

      Do you hear a howl outside the window? It is they-the liberals howl .. the blood of the patriot is thirsty ... laughing
      You and your nickname are fine .. a conspiracy of their filthy, but what a villainous weed .. laughing You look and fight back, do not see them the body of the commissar ..
  17. +1
    2 December 2015 10: 53
    And who was this law that previously slowed down? !! "Name sisaaaa !!!"
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 11: 21
      Quote: Samara-58
      Sister name aaaa !!! "


      Sssestraaaa !!! .. Duck .. laughing KVN 2001
  18. +2
    2 December 2015 10: 54
    At last. They swayed for a long time.
    Whose "sins" are we correcting?
  19. +2
    2 December 2015 10: 54
    Well, now I would have to make changes to the law on the Central Bank.
  20. +4
    2 December 2015 10: 55
    The ECHR has long begun to interpret the term "human rights" as the political situation is developing and as the customer wants at the moment. Therefore, it is high time to give them a shortcut.
  21. 0
    2 December 2015 10: 58
    paper there .. paper here .. who knows the thread of his deputy from his locality in the State Duma ?? so the King and K wrote, they decided - to send them to the Heypop one more time
  22. 0
    2 December 2015 10: 58
    Well, as the "great strategist" used to say: "... the ice is broken, gentlemen of the jury!" Enough to endure the arbitrariness committed by the West against Russia under the guise of the so-called. "struggle for human rights", they do not notice the logs in their own eyes, but they see a speck in someone else's eye. The chicken "pecks by the grain", I think the turn will come to the nationalization of the Central Bank! Moreover, the recent events in the light of the Turkish provocation will give a new impetus to the revision of the treacherous decisions taken by the gang of "liberal traitors", the time has come ...
  23. +1
    2 December 2015 10: 59
    The ECHR is an American project and therefore judges from the ECHR do their best to turn their faces away from Guantanamo, the NSA’s surveillance of a network of arrests all over the world. But when you look at the Russian Federation, they start to shake them like drug people
  24. +2
    2 December 2015 11: 03
    But we will come to the Constitution of the USSR of 1936.
  25. 0
    2 December 2015 11: 05
    For all 100 I support, and yet, let's give normal laws for ordinary citizens and for complicated citizens (Serdyukovs, Chubais, etc.) individually for them laws!
  26. 0
    2 December 2015 11: 08
    It’s high time, and then some sort of Yuyusovskiy court of state N issued a decision for everyone and everyone! They pull too much on themselves!
  27. 0
    2 December 2015 11: 08
    Well, thank God, they gave birth! The ECHR has its own rights as a European man, and we have ours. They have no concept of blasphemy, but we, thank God, still remain.
  28. 0
    2 December 2015 11: 11
    "... What the Bolsheviks talked about for so long happened ...")))
  29. +2
    2 December 2015 11: 14
    And Article 15 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus "On the priority of international law" was adopted only because then they themselves were eager to go to Europe, in the WTO they adjusted the documents to their standards.
    Constitution This is primarily a national document and she cannot express the opinions of others!
    The constitution can only express the opinion of its citizens!
    Acceptance of someone else’s opinion (law, regulation, etc.) - contradicts the sovereignty of the state, turning it into a dependent.
  30. 0
    2 December 2015 11: 26
    Why are everyone here happy? Of course, this ban will pinch the tails of every hodor, just separate the flies from the cutlets: much more appeals to the European Court were ordinary citizens who were victims of the police and bureaucratic lawlessness.
    if such principled people are sitting in the Kremlin, then they had to break the Central Bank over the knee. Ha! how can you wait! there are the interests of big bosses, try sunxia. And for the rights of the population, like a sickle for personal belongings, this is please. Moreover, they will present it on a wave of patriotic frenzy like candy. and tomorrow one of us will be mixed up, pushed around the "Basmanny courts" and will receive a final verdict-verdict and not subject to appeal! Then it will start scratching turnips. Do not start with that. Independence begins first of all with the ECONOMY. That's when they announce to us that now we have our own payment system, our own state banking system and the ban on the circulation of American rubles, then I will believe.
    Now all the patriots who have green stockings in their stockings start to minus. How-on the holy bit.
  31. 0
    2 December 2015 11: 31
    Quote: vovanpain
    This must be done a long time ago, but better late than never. Actually, it is necessary to change the entire colonial Yeltsin constitution. I imagine how liberals and grant-eaters will conquer now.

    And we also need a law to deprive the citizens of the Russian Federation of those "patriots" who obseraut RUSSIA, but at the same time enjoy all the rights of a citizen of the Russian Federation.
  32. +1
    2 December 2015 11: 37
    “Cases of possible non-execution or appeal to the assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation will undoubtedly be of a singular nature”

    Strange position. What does single mean? "Single" means that, if desired, the issue can be resolved, in the interests of those who will bring more, or sit higher. It seems that they are fighting corruption, and they themselves are opening a new unplowed field. It is necessary to completely abolish, so that everyone is always equal before the law.
  33. +2
    2 December 2015 11: 39
    guzik007
    Why are everyone here happy? .....

    We are glad that the hope began to appear that Russia is dropping from itself everything that was imposed on it.
    The European Court enjoyed ordinary citizens who were victims of the police and bureaucratic lawlessness.

    Therefore, they complained that it was a single US program to undermine power in the Russian Federation. Turning the Constitution of the Russian Federation into a formal piece of paper binding it on the hands of international law. More precisely, the law of the United States and the EU !. So many issues were not resolved on their own!
    Now it will be possible to adopt sovereign norms and rules in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
    IMHO! hi
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 13: 20
      Turning the Constitution of the Russian Federation into a formal piece of paper binding it on the hands of international law.
      -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
      --------
      As I understand it, minus yours. Read to the end? As you say, the Constitution was turned into a piece of paper by an article on the independence of the Central Bank from the state, first of all. And the independence of the go-va is primarily economic independence. The house is not built from the roof, from the foundation. It was necessary to start with the foundation, and everything else, like the courts and so on, is only applied. And so ... swing for a ruble-blow for a penny. Moreover, what is it, "in some cases"? So there is no reason to "throw your caps into the air"
      1. 0
        2 December 2015 13: 27
        guzik007
        As I understand it, minus yours.

        Misunderstood!
        I am able to respect the opinions of others. And if I’m minus (which is very, very rare) then I’m not hiding, but I do it openly and explain why!
        hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
  34. 0
    2 December 2015 11: 55
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Its jurisdiction extends to members of the Council of Europe, which includes Russia.

    Of course, I agree that the Constitution and the laws of the Russian Federation go first. It just bothers me that under an ANTINAROLOGY government, soon sensible criticism will be equated with terrorism and an anti-state act. after all, only "red" and "white." After all, you just say something unpleasant to the authorities, and you are equated with Navalny and Co. hiRS-And now they will write laws without looking back!
  35. 0
    2 December 2015 12: 08
    I am generally surprised that with such a "fair" world refereeing, in the presence of double standards, we were dragging on for so long ... And somehow very timidly "individual". It is necessary to introduce that all decisions that contradict national laws and decisions, the priority of our legislation. It is then that we can be called, albeit with an "interference", a sovereign country
  36. 0
    2 December 2015 12: 10
    and rightly so it's time
  37. 0
    2 December 2015 12: 24
    let's hope that the central bank at the legislative level is next, as kakly yell - laughing

    Death to the liberals!
  38. 0
    2 December 2015 12: 29
    Finally .
  39. +2
    2 December 2015 12: 31
    applaud while standing !! and whom our constitution does not suit can bring down where you like!
  40. -1
    2 December 2015 12: 42
    Well, at least something. And of course, amendments to the Constitution are needed.
  41. -1
    2 December 2015 12: 46
    But nothing that Art. 15 prioritizes the application of international law?
    If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than those provided by law, the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

    Since the arbitration was killed, the judicial system as such has disappeared in this country.
    Aslo, how will our ministry of external relations screech about compliance with international law if we ourselves cannot comply with them? Some kind of sur.
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 19: 12
      Apparently for 7 years of study you have not yet understood the difference between "international law" and "international treaty", Art. 15 talks about the contract fool
  42. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 09
    Hooray !!! The path to independence !!!
  43. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 14
    how now they’ll start screaming at the expense of the Yukos case! otherwise the priority was like a bone in the throat!
  44. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 22
    Break off, liberals and pedecrates ... good
  45. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 57
    We must not depend on laws contrary to our Constitution.
  46. 0
    2 December 2015 16: 58
    I agree with Nikolai71, the right decision, it is high time, otherwise the supremacy of international law over national law was prescribed in the EBN Constitution.
  47. 0
    2 December 2015 23: 59
    The first "stone" has been thrown, I hope on the territory of Russia national laws will "prevail" over supranational ones.