Military Review

Iranian Navy Receives New Domestic Gadir Rocket

44
In Iran, developed and built a new cruise missile "Gadir", with its creation used only domestic technology, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to the republican state television.


Iranian Navy Receives New Domestic Gadir Rocket


According to the information, "the range of the missile is 300 kilometers, it is equipped with the latest guidance and orientation systems on the ground."

It is noted that, first of all, “the rocket is intended for the Iranian naval forces, however, air and ground-based versions have been developed.”

According to television, "the first recipient of the marine modification of the rocket was the Navy of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps." Rocket transfer the fleet It was held in a festive atmosphere with the participation of Iranian Defense Minister Dehkan and Navy Commander-in-Chief Sayyari.

Iran’s arms also include other domestic cruise missiles, such as the Meskat (built on the basis of the Soviet X-55) with a range of 2 thousand km, Nasr-e Basir and Qadir, produced in land and sea-based versions.
Photos used:
tanvir.ir
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tor5
    Tor5 1 December 2015 14: 06 New
    +5
    Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. maxiban
      maxiban 1 December 2015 14: 10 New
      +3
      I think that it was not without our scientists and technologies.
      1. spravochnik
        spravochnik 1 December 2015 14: 31 New
        +2
        No, this is a copy of a Chinese rocket.
      2. good7
        good7 1 December 2015 14: 41 New
        -3
        I don’t think that rocket technology will provide such friends, and Iran isn’t Saudi Arabia, but those artisans of Arabs who instilled a culture? Just give without the great Arab scholars - the early Arabs were Christians.
    3. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 1 December 2015 14: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: Tor5
      Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

      I’m glad for Iran (although I don’t consider them to be just friends ...) They are developing and not bad ... And the United States has imposed sanctions on them for a long time and powerful (unlike Russia!) While Russia, Syria, Iran are holding on normally! The group is powerful, try take gentlemen ... hi
    4. enhansment
      enhansment 1 December 2015 14: 13 New
      +4
      Quote: Tor5
      Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

      An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 1 December 2015 14: 28 New
        +1
        Iran technically militarily lagged behind incredibly. Let us hope that there will be enough time for it to rearm by the hour "H" - when the situation requires active action, except for the "consultations" of Hezbollah IRGC.
        For the Persians are our allies there.
        All the developing turmoil in Syria so far lies on the shoulders of the Russian Federation. In terms of the military-industrial complex.
        1. Talgat
          Talgat 1 December 2015 18: 49 New
          +1
          Quote: enhansment
          since we are for them shaitan №2


          The Iranian leadership always calls Russia (and Kazakhstan by the way) exclusively only friends, a friendly country, etc. Read Iranian sai - speeches by Ahmadinejad and Sajidi and Rouhani, etc.

          Iran has been knocking on the doors of the CSTO, the Eurasian Union and the SCO for the second decade, in recent years it has achieved a real breakthrough in relations with Kazakhstan - and recently with Russia

          There never was a bad word. Only once - in my opinion, Ahmadinejad called Medvedev "the mouthpiece of American imperialism" - and even then it’s not evil - they just signed a contract and paid for c-300, which they really need - but they didn’t put these “mouthpieces”

          USA and West always have shaitan and enemy

          And the phrase “small shaitan” came from the Soviet era - when a dull (shaving off beards - abandoning Allah. Joins the Communist Party - well, stupidity is real) policy of Suslov and the ideology department of the Central Committee offended - pushed and angered potential Iranian allies
          In my place I would have called the whole department of ideology - the shaitans - who else are they?
          1. miru mir
            miru mir 1 December 2015 18: 58 New
            0
            The Turkish leadership also called Russia (and Kazakhstan, by the way, so far) exclusively friends.
            And do not distort about the attitude to religion in the USSR - no one shaved his beards forcibly and did not pull them into the party at gunpoint. All peoples lived in friendship.
      2. padded jacket
        padded jacket 1 December 2015 14: 40 New
        0
        Quote: enhansment
        An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

        This is where did you read such nonsense?
        Together with Iran, we are fighting against terrorists in Syria.
        1. enhansment
          enhansment 1 December 2015 14: 46 New
          +1
          Quote: quilted jacket
          Quote: enhansment
          An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

          This is where did you read such nonsense?
          Together with Iran, we are fighting against terrorists in Syria.

          Solovyov in his program said the other day or lied?
          1. padded jacket
            padded jacket 1 December 2015 14: 55 New
            0
            Quote: enhansment
            Solovyov in his program said the other day or lied?

            Solovyov said a lot, for example -
            When Jews appeared in Russian, Russians were still not in the project.
            1. Wiski
              Wiski 1 December 2015 17: 28 New
              0

              Solovyov said a lot, for example -
              When Jews appeared in Russian, Russians were still not in the project.
              Reply Citir


              Of course it wasn’t.


              RUSSIA. Jews in the territory of ancient Russia before the 14th century

              On the lands of Eastern Europe adjacent to the Black and Azov Seas (some of them are now part of the Russian Federation, part of Ukraine), Jews first appeared no later than the 2nd – 1st centuries. BC uh. in Greek policies (subsequently as part of the Bosporus kingdom, Roman Empire); their spoken language was Greek. Jewish communities had cemeteries, synagogues, public buildings;



              East Slavic tribes, which, according to most scholars, managed to merge into a single nation, made up the main population of the medieval Old Russian state. As a result of the subsequent political stratification of the Eastern Slavs, XVII century three] peoples were formed (in decreasing order of numbers): the Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian peoples.

              В V — vii centuries Slavs spread widely in Europe; their many tribes geographically divided on the southern, western and eastern, which were waiting for different historical destinies. The Eastern Slavs flooded Eastern Europe with two streams. One group of tribes settled in the Dnieper basin in the territory of modern Ukraine.
      3. Amurets
        Amurets 1 December 2015 14: 53 New
        +1
        Quote: enhansment
        Quote: Tor5
        Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

        An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

        You're not right! We are for them shaitan No. 3, after Turkey and the United States, and to be honest, at the present time, few people support Iran except Russia. And Russia needs such an ally and we can tie it up with deliveries of high-tech products, including air defense systems. I wouldn’t supply shock weapons, and the Iranians would have them without us. And the force that restrains Turkey will not hinder us from the allies. The hostility between the Persians and Turks has been going on for several centuries.
        1. enhansment
          enhansment 1 December 2015 14: 58 New
          +1
          Quote: Amurets
          Quote: enhansment
          Quote: Tor5
          Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

          An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

          You're not right! We are for them shaitan No. 3, after Turkey and the United States, and to be honest, at the present time, few people support Iran except Russia. And Russia needs such an ally and we can tie it up with deliveries of high-tech products, including air defense systems. I wouldn’t supply shock weapons, and the Iranians would have them without us. And the force that restrains Turkey will not hinder us from the allies. The hostility between the Persians and Turks has been going on for several centuries.

          Right now it’s possible. But we need to think strategically, right now, as many suggest, we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?
          1. padded jacket
            padded jacket 1 December 2015 15: 18 New
            +1
            Quote: enhansment
            we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?

            That is, following your logic in Russia, it is necessary to curtail and even urgently stop all arms exports, since the countries to which we sold weapons tomorrow may "turn their backs on us" or even betray lol
            1. enhansment
              enhansment 1 December 2015 15: 32 New
              +1
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Quote: enhansment
              we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?

              That is, following your logic in Russia, it is urgent to curtail and even urgently stop all arms exports, since the country we sold weapons to tomorrow may "turn their backs on us" or even betray lol

              Where did I write this? 1) It is necessary to approach arms deliveries not only commercially, but also from the point of view of the nat. security. 2) Do not supply our latest developments 3) Refuse to supply arms to our geopolitical competitors and focus on other markets. Well, we don’t have friends, and indeed politics and friends are not compatible things.
              You don’t have much logic, let’s sell something secret to the Americans tomorrow? But what is beneficial, money for the development of the military-industrial complex (in the pocket of bureaucrats) is empty.
              1. padded jacket
                padded jacket 1 December 2015 16: 14 New
                -1
                Quote: enhansment
                Where did I write this?

                Here they wrote:
                Quote: enhansment
                we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?

                --------------------------------------
                Quote: enhansment
                1) It is necessary to approach arms deliveries not only commercially, but also from the point of view of the nat. safety

                Correctly, this means not selling weapons to "enemies" - the United States and its satellites.
                Quote: enhansment
                2) Do not supply our latest designs

                Exactly smile we will not sell the SU-35 but we will MIG-21 only who will take it, it has long been outdated.
                Quote: enhansment
                3) Refuse to supply arms to our geopolitical competitors and focus on other markets.

                Iran is our ally, we are fighting with him in Syria against terrorism.

                Quote: enhansment
                Well, we don’t have friends, and indeed politics and friends are not compatible things.

                And based on these words of yours, should Russia begin to isolate itself and not enter into an alliance with anyone?
                Quote: enhansment
                With logic, you are not very

                In your words, I didn’t see any logic at all, only fears and blind follow of Western propaganda stuffed with you.
                Quote: enhansment
                let's tomorrow

                I think that even tomorrow it’s unlikely that I’ll hear anything sane from you.
                Quote: enhansment
                Do we sell anything secret to the Americans?

                What does the USA have to do with it?
                Quote: enhansment
                But what is beneficial, money for the development of the military-industrial complex (in the pocket of bureaucrats) is empty.

                It seems that you personally climb these pockets of bureaucrats and know exactly where and whose money they are in laughing
          2. Mig-31
            Mig-31 1 December 2015 16: 16 New
            +1
            Why do not you consider weapons in the export version? The main thing for you is to blurt out, after all, Russia will not supply weapons in the original version, all weapons will be delivered in a truncated version with some kind of on / off chip.
      4. Mig-31
        Mig-31 1 December 2015 16: 10 New
        +3
        Actually, Shaitan is number 3, number 1 is the United States, number 2 is Israel, and the third was the USSR, but not Russia at all.
      5. Dam
        Dam 1 December 2015 16: 16 New
        0
        Not us, but you. Russian flag on the avatar - disguise?
    5. Sterlya
      Sterlya 1 December 2015 21: 42 New
      0
      Quote: Tor5
      Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

      Imagine that I began the 3rd world? Are countries ready for this?
      It seems to me that the United States will remain against all against whom it began, The rest of the NATO Allies will bury their heads in the sand, and zhooop? Not until this ....
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 1 December 2015 14: 10 New
      +5
      Quote: maxiban
      I think it was not without our scientists and technologies.
      Technology remained from the x-55 and the brains from there.
  3. Hydrograph
    Hydrograph 1 December 2015 14: 06 New
    +5
    Well, here is another super power drew. The main thing is not to overdo it as with the Turks.
    1. Al_oriso
      Al_oriso 1 December 2015 14: 37 New
      +4
      Friendship with Iran has long been strong. USA contributes to this.
  4. Wiruz
    Wiruz 1 December 2015 14: 08 New
    +2
    As I understand it, it's still RCC. Interesting, but somewhere we already saw it bully
  5. Teberii
    Teberii 1 December 2015 14: 09 New
    +1
    Well, if it turns out, then why not. Let them be strengthened in such a hectic region.
  6. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 1 December 2015 14: 13 New
    0
    The photo for the article is definitely not a cruise missile ...
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 1 December 2015 14: 22 New
      +2
      Somewhat confused with their missile names a little earlier, they already represented anti-ship missiles with the similar name "Ghader" with a range of 200 km as a development of the previous anti-ship missile system "Noor" with a range of 120 km.
      The video shows that the “Gader” is longer than the “Nur.”

      PU PKR "Gader"
  7. win
    win 1 December 2015 14: 13 New
    +4
    Here is another country that will not, in agreement with the owner of the White House, Barack the First (and, thank God, the last) click his heels and stretch into the string
  8. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 1 December 2015 14: 21 New
    +2
    Something reminiscent of an X-58 with an accelerator and "Exoset" French)))
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 1 December 2015 14: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: stock buildbat
      Something reminiscent of an X-58 with an accelerator and "Exoset" French)))

      Iranian anti-ship missiles are all somewhat similar to Exoset, regardless of size and range
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 1 December 2015 14: 46 New
        -1
        RCC "Gader" on the "Phantom"
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 1 December 2015 14: 52 New
        +2
        Well, they are produced in a factory equipped with the Chinese, where C-802 - which are the Chinese Exocet - were produced under license.

        The Iranians, by the way, made a very good land installation. In the hidden state, it is completely camouflaged under a regular truck.

        Awning or removable panels are pulled over the frame.
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 1 December 2015 15: 01 New
          +3
          Quote: donavi49
          Awning or removable panels are pulled over the frame.

          In Iran, almost all PU anti-ship missiles are disguised as civilian trucks, they are not even painted in camouflage. Here you can clearly see how it is arranged on top of the frame tossed an awning.
      3. Amurets
        Amurets 1 December 2015 17: 02 New
        0
        Quote: quilted jacket
        Iranian anti-ship missiles are all somewhat similar to Exoset, regardless of size and range

        And they remind me of the B-750 series missiles and their modifications of the B-755.
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 1 December 2015 14: 28 New
    +2
    This prodigy is not like a cruise missile. Therefore, let us leave the applicants on the conscience. They want to frighten a potential enemy by blocking the Strait of Hormuz - let them frighten. While we are in the same team with Iran. And it would be nice to stay in it. And then somehow the Islamic world starts to feel dizzy.
    1. kote119
      kote119 1 December 2015 14: 57 New
      -1
      this is the most common cruise missile
    2. miru mir
      miru mir 1 December 2015 16: 40 New
      +1
      So Iran is the most that is not Islamic laughing
  10. na76
    na76 1 December 2015 14: 47 New
    +1
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    This prodigy is not like a cruise missile.

    but they didn’t hear about the cruise missile scheme with cruciform or X-shaped wings, no? Wiki to help you.
    The harpoon and exoset then, like not cruise missiles?
  11. Hydrograph
    Hydrograph 1 December 2015 14: 48 New
    +1
    This prodigy is not like a cruise missile.

    Let me ask, How long does a cruise missile start with a wing? Is it really a plane that needs a lot of lift?
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 1 December 2015 16: 42 New
      0
      It was the “land-to-land” Kyrgyz Republic with a range of 1500 kilometers that they presented quite a while ago under the name “Sumar” (Soumar)
  12. Bongo
    Bongo 1 December 2015 14: 53 New
    +5
    Iranian Navy Receives New Domestic Gadir Rocket

    Apparently, the design of the "Iranian" missile was borrowed from the Chinese anti-ship missiles of the YJ-8 family

    Iranian rocket


    RCC YJ-8 suspended under the Chinese fighter-bomber JH-7


    Chinese anti-ship missiles YJ-83


    The Iranians didn’t even change their color; it’s quite possible that Gadir’s anti-ship missiles were manufactured in China, and only renamed in Iran.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 1 December 2015 15: 10 New
      0
      Quote: Bongo
      The Iranians didn’t even change their color; it’s quite possible that Gadir’s anti-ship missiles were manufactured in China, and only renamed in Iran.

      Not much is not exactly about the previous version of the rocket produced in Iran under the name "Noor" and is really the Chinese anti-ship missile C-802. And the article is already about its development of the Gadir anti-ship missile system.
      About PKR "Nur":
      These missiles were developed in China and adopted by the PLA in the late 1980s, under the name YJ-82, offered for export as the C-802. Iran received the first C-802 from China along with missile boats purchased in the mid-1990s. Soon after, the rearmament of Iranian large ships to these anti-ship missiles began. In the next few years, an agreement was probably reached between China and Iran on organizing the assembly / production of these missiles in Iran. In the first half of the 2000s, Iran introduced the components of a new rocket, such as turbojet engines and ARGS, after which the launch of Nur rockets in Iran began.
  13. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 1 December 2015 14: 53 New
    +2
    Iranians are great! They themselves produce high-tech equipment, despite some kind of sanctions and so on. And no one bends before anyone!
  14. Dam
    Dam 1 December 2015 16: 25 New
    +2
    I can say one thing about Iran: stubborn, stubborn in a good way. How many years under sanctions and have not caved in under Pax Americana. Somewhere behind in technology, but the fighters and therefore did not dare to fuck them with a color revolution. I hope the allies will be without prostitution, like father.
    1. Talgat
      Talgat 1 December 2015 18: 58 New
      0
      Of course, I support your post as a whole - Iranians are allies and friends - this is definitely

      But you can’t put them on the same level with Belarus

      Belarus (like KZ) is not even allies - in fact, our republics are components of Eurasia - one world is one civilization - therefore we are integrating - and therefore the 3 republics have long been the foundation of the CSTO, etc.

      What kind of Old Man would not be - but for me, and I'm sure for any Kazakh he is a thousand times closer than any Ahmadinejad (whatever this Ahmadinejad would be a noble hero for freedom and against the USA)

      Iran - albeit an ally and friend - but it is a foreign culture - a foreign world - does not apply to Gumilev Eurasia (like the Chinese incidentally). In general, flies cutlets separately as needed