Iranian Navy Receives New Domestic Gadir Rocket

In Iran, developed and built a new cruise missile "Gadir", with its creation used only domestic technology, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to the republican state television.

According to the information, "the range of the missile is 300 kilometers, it is equipped with the latest guidance and orientation systems on the ground."

It is noted that, first of all, “the rocket is intended for the Iranian naval forces, however, air and ground-based versions have been developed.”

According to television, "the first recipient of the marine modification of the rocket was the Navy of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps." Rocket transfer the fleet It was held in a festive atmosphere with the participation of Iranian Defense Minister Dehkan and Navy Commander-in-Chief Sayyari.

Iran’s arms also include other domestic cruise missiles, such as the Meskat (built on the basis of the Soviet X-55) with a range of 2 thousand km, Nasr-e Basir and Qadir, produced in land and sea-based versions.

Comments

[Tor5]

Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

[maxiban]

I think that it was not without our scientists and technologies.

[spravochnik]

No, this is a copy of a Chinese rocket.

[good7]

I don’t think that rocket technology will provide such friends, and Iran isn’t Saudi Arabia, but those artisans of Arabs who instilled a culture? Just give without the great Arab scholars - the early Arabs were Christians.

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: Tor5

Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

I’m glad for Iran (although I don’t consider them to be just friends ...) They are developing and not bad ... And the United States has imposed sanctions on them for a long time and powerful (unlike Russia!) While Russia, Syria, Iran are holding on normally! The group is powerful, try take gentlemen ...

[enhancement]

Quote: Tor5

Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

[mirag2]

Iran technically lagged behind militarily. Let's hope that there will be enough time for it to rearm by hour "H" - when the situation will require it to take active action, except for "consultations" of Hezbollah to the IRGC.
For the Persians are our allies there.
All the developing turmoil in Syria so far lies on the shoulders of the Russian Federation. In terms of the military-industrial complex.

[Talgat]

Quote: enhansment

since we are for them shaitan №2

The Iranian leadership always calls Russia (and Kazakhstan by the way) exclusively only friends, a friendly country, etc. Read Iranian sai - speeches by Ahmadinejad and Sajidi and Rouhani, etc.

For the second decade Iran has been "knocking" on the doors of the CSTO, the Eurasian Union and the SCO, in recent years it has achieved a real breakthrough in relations with Kazakhstan - and recently with Russia

There was never even a bad word. Only once - Ahmadinejad, in my opinion, called Medvedev "the mouthpiece of American imperialism" - and even then not out of malice - they just signed a contract and paid for the S-300, which they really need - but these "mouthpieces" were not delivered

USA and West always have shaitan and enemy

And the phrase “small shaitan” came from the Soviet era - when a dull (shaving off beards - abandoning Allah. Joins the Communist Party - well, stupidity is real) policy of Suslov and the ideology department of the Central Committee offended - pushed and angered potential Iranian allies
In my place I would have called the whole department of ideology - the shaitans - who else are they?

[miru mir]

The Turkish leadership also called Russia (and Kazakhstan, by the way, so far) exclusively friends.
And do not distort about the attitude to religion in the USSR - no one shaved his beards forcibly and did not pull them into the party at gunpoint. All peoples lived in friendship.

[padded jacket]

Quote: enhansment

An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

This is where did you read such nonsense?
Together with Iran, we are fighting against terrorists in Syria.

[enhancement]

Quote: quilted jacket

Quote: enhansment

An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

This is where did you read such nonsense?
Together with Iran, we are fighting against terrorists in Syria.

Solovyov in his program said the other day or lied?

[padded jacket]

Quote: enhansment

Solovyov in his program said the other day or lied?

Solovyov said a lot, for example -
When Jews appeared in Russian, Russians were still not in the project.

[Whiskey]

Solovyov said a lot, for example -
When Jews appeared in Russian, Russians were still not in the project.
Reply Citir

Of course it wasn’t.

RUSSIA. Jews in the territory of ancient Russia before the 14th century

On the lands of Eastern Europe adjacent to the Black and Azov Seas (some of them are now part of the Russian Federation, part of Ukraine), Jews first appeared no later than the 2nd – 1st centuries. BC uh. in Greek policies (subsequently as part of the Bosporus kingdom, Roman Empire); their spoken language was Greek. Jewish communities had cemeteries, synagogues, public buildings;

East Slavic tribes, which, according to most scholars, managed to merge into a single nation, made up the main population of the medieval Old Russian state. As a result of the subsequent political stratification of the Eastern Slavs, XVII century three] peoples were formed (in decreasing order of numbers): the Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian peoples.

В V — vii centuries Slavs spread widely in Europe; their many tribes geographically divided on the southern, western and eastern, which were waiting for different historical destinies. The Eastern Slavs flooded Eastern Europe with two streams. One group of tribes settled in the Dnieper basin in the territory of modern Ukraine.

[Amurets]

Quote: enhansment

Quote: Tor5

Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

You're not right! We are for them shaitan No. 3, after Turkey and the United States, and to be honest, at the present time, few people support Iran except Russia. And Russia needs such an ally and we can tie it up with deliveries of high-tech products, including air defense systems. I wouldn’t supply shock weapons, and the Iranians would have them without us. And the force that restrains Turkey will not hinder us from the allies. The hostility between the Persians and Turks has been going on for several centuries.

[enhancement]

Quote: Amurets

Quote: enhansment

Quote: Tor5

Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

An excellent ally, I must say, since we are for them Shaitan No. 2

You're not right! We are for them shaitan No. 3, after Turkey and the United States, and to be honest, at the present time, few people support Iran except Russia. And Russia needs such an ally and we can tie it up with deliveries of high-tech products, including air defense systems. I wouldn’t supply shock weapons, and the Iranians would have them without us. And the force that restrains Turkey will not hinder us from the allies. The hostility between the Persians and Turks has been going on for several centuries.

Right now it’s possible. But we need to think strategically, right now, as many suggest, we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?

[padded jacket]

Quote: enhansment

we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?

That is, following your logic, Russia needs to curtail and even urgently stop all arms exports, since the countries to which we sold arms tomorrow may "turn their backs on us" or even betray

[enhancement]

Quote: quilted jacket

Quote: enhansment

we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?

That is, following your logic, Russia urgently needs to curtail and even urgently stop all arms exports, since the country to which we sold arms tomorrow may "turn its back on us" or even betray

Where did I write this? 1) It is necessary to approach arms deliveries not only commercially, but also from the point of view of the nat. security. 2) Do not supply our latest developments 3) Refuse to supply arms to our geopolitical competitors and focus on other markets. Well, we don’t have friends, and indeed politics and friends are not compatible things.
You don’t have much logic, let’s sell something secret to the Americans tomorrow? But what is beneficial, money for the development of the military-industrial complex (in the pocket of bureaucrats) is empty.

[padded jacket]

Quote: enhansment

Where did I write this?

Here they wrote:

Quote: enhansment

we will supply Iran with our latest weapons and new developments, and the day after tomorrow Iran should not turn its back on Russia. Then again we will bite our elbows and lament that we were betrayed?

--------------------------------------

Quote: enhansment

1) It is necessary to approach arms deliveries not only commercially, but also from the point of view of the nat. safety

Correctly, this means not to sell weapons to "enemies" - the United States and its satellites.

Quote: enhansment

2) Do not supply our latest designs

Exactly we will not sell the SU-35 but we will MIG-21 only who will take it, it has long been outdated.

Quote: enhansment

3) Refuse to supply arms to our geopolitical competitors and focus on other markets.

Iran is our ally, we are fighting with him in Syria against terrorism.

Quote: enhansment

Well, we don’t have friends, and indeed politics and friends are not compatible things.

And based on these words of yours, should Russia begin to isolate itself and not enter into an alliance with anyone?

Quote: enhansment

With logic, you are not very

In your words, I didn’t see any logic at all, only fears and blind follow of Western propaganda stuffed with you.

Quote: enhansment

let's tomorrow

I think that even tomorrow it’s unlikely that I’ll hear anything sane from you.

Quote: enhansment

Do we sell anything secret to the Americans?

What does the USA have to do with it?

Quote: enhansment

But what is beneficial, money for the development of the military-industrial complex (in the pocket of bureaucrats) is empty.

It seems that you personally climb these pockets of bureaucrats and know exactly where and whose money they are in

[Mig-31]

Why do not you consider weapons in the export version? The main thing for you is to blurt out, after all, Russia will not supply weapons in the original version, all weapons will be delivered in a truncated version with some kind of on / off chip.

[Mig-31]

Actually, Shaitan is number 3, number 1 is the United States, number 2 is Israel, and the third was the USSR, but not Russia at all.

[Dam]

Not us, but you. Russian flag on the avatar - disguise?

[Sterlya]

Quote: Tor5

Well, while Iran is our ally, we will rejoice together.

Imagine that I began the 3rd world? Are countries ready for this?
It seems to me that the United States will remain against all against whom it began, The rest of the NATO Allies will bury their heads in the sand, and zhooop? Not until this ....

[kil 31]

Quote: maxiban

I think it was not without our scientists and technologies.

Technology remained from the x-55 and the brains from there.

[Hydrograph]

Well, here is another super power drew. The main thing is not to overdo it as with the Turks.

[Al_oriso]

Friendship with Iran has long been strong. USA contributes to this.

[Wiruz]

As I understand it, it's still RCC. Interesting, but somewhere we already saw it

[Teberii]

Well, if it turns out, then why not. Let them be strengthened in such a hectic region.

[Mama_Cholli]

The photo for the article is definitely not a cruise missile ...

[padded jacket]

Somewhat already confused with their missile names a little earlier, they already presented an anti-ship missile with a similar name "Ghader" with a range of 200 km as a development of the previous anti-ship missile "Nur" with a range of 120 km.
The video shows that "Gader" is longer than "Nur".

PU anti-ship missiles "Gader"

[win]

Here is another country that will not, in agreement with the owner of the White House, Barack the First (and, thank God, the last) click his heels and stretch into the string

[Reserve buildbat]

Something resembles the X-58 with an accelerator and "Exocet" French)))

[padded jacket]

Quote: Stroibat stock

Something resembles the X-58 with an accelerator and "Exocet" French)))

Iranian anti-ship missiles are all somewhat similar to Exocet, regardless of size and range

[padded jacket]

ASM "Gader" on "Phantom"

[donavi49]

Well, they are produced in a factory equipped with the Chinese, where C-802 - which are the Chinese Exocet - were produced under license.

The Iranians, by the way, made a very good land installation. In the hidden state, it is completely camouflaged under a regular truck.

Awning or removable panels are pulled over the frame.

[padded jacket]

Quote: donavi49

Awning or removable panels are pulled over the frame.

In Iran, almost all PU anti-ship missiles are disguised as civilian trucks, they are not even painted in camouflage. Here you can clearly see how it is arranged on top of the frame tossed an awning.

[Amurets]

Quote: quilted jacket

Iranian anti-ship missiles are all somewhat similar to Exocet, regardless of size and range

And they remind me of the B-750 series missiles and their modifications of the B-755.

[Mountain shooter]

This prodigy is not like a cruise missile. Therefore, let us leave the applicants on the conscience. They want to frighten a potential enemy by blocking the Strait of Hormuz - let them frighten. While we are in the same team with Iran. And it would be nice to stay in it. And then somehow the Islamic world starts to feel dizzy.

[kote119]

this is the most common cruise missile

[miru mir]

So Iran is the most that is not Islamic

[na76]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

This prodigy is not like a cruise missile.

but they didn’t hear about the cruise missile scheme with cruciform or X-shaped wings, no? Wiki to help you.
The harpoon and exoset then, like not cruise missiles?

[Hydrograph]

This prodigy is not like a cruise missile.

Let me ask, How long does a cruise missile start with a wing? Is it really a plane that needs a lot of lift?

[padded jacket]

It was the ground-to-ground CR with a range of 1500 kilometers that they presented for a long time under the name "Soumar"

[Bongo]

Iranian Navy Receives New Domestic Gadir Rocket

Apparently, the design of the "Iranian" missile was borrowed from the Chinese anti-ship missile of the YJ-8 family.

"Iranian" rocket

RCC YJ-8 suspended under the Chinese fighter-bomber JH-7

Chinese anti-ship missiles YJ-83

The Iranians didn’t even change their color; it’s quite possible that Gadir’s anti-ship missiles were manufactured in China, and only renamed in Iran.

[padded jacket]

Quote: Bongo

The Iranians didn’t even change their color; it’s quite possible that Gadir’s anti-ship missiles were manufactured in China, and only renamed in Iran.

Not much is not certain about the previous version of the missile produced in Iran under the name "Noor" and is indeed the Chinese anti-ship missile C-802. And in the article already about its development of the Gadir anti-ship missile system.
About anti-ship missile "Nur":
These missiles were developed in the PRC and adopted by the PLA in the late 1980s, under the name YJ-82, offered for export as the C-802. Iran received the first C-802s from China along with missile boats purchased in the mid-1990s. Soon after that, the rearmament of Iranian large ships began on these anti-ship missiles. In the next few years, an agreement was likely reached between China and Iran to organize the assembly / production of these missiles in Iran. In the first half of the 2000s, components of a new rocket, such as turbojet engines and ARGSN, were presented in Iran, after which the release of Nur missiles began in Iran.

[dchegrinec]

Iranians are great! They themselves produce high-tech equipment, despite some kind of sanctions and so on. And no one bends before anyone!

[Dam]

I can say one thing about Iran: stubborn, stubborn in a good way. How many years under sanctions and have not caved in under Pax Americana. Somewhere behind in technology, but the fighters and therefore did not dare to fuck them with a color revolution. I hope the allies will be without prostitution, like father.

[Talgat]

Of course, I support your post as a whole - Iranians are allies and friends - this is definitely

But you can’t put them on the same level with Belarus

Belarus (like KZ) is not even allies - in fact, our republics are components of Eurasia - one world is one civilization - therefore we are integrating - and therefore the 3 republics have long been the foundation of the CSTO, etc.

What kind of Old Man would not be - but for me, and I'm sure for any Kazakh he is a thousand times closer than any Ahmadinejad (whatever this Ahmadinejad would be a noble hero for freedom and against the USA)

Iran - albeit an ally and friend - but it is a foreign culture - a foreign world - does not apply to Gumilev Eurasia (like the Chinese incidentally). In general, flies cutlets separately as needed