Military Review

Goals and objectives of the "political aikido" of the Kremlin

83
Goals and objectives of the "political aikido" of the Kremlin

... to win, we must be the last to come to this carnival



For an adequate perception of the world in all its complexity and completeness, it is extremely important to have not only a developed conceptual apparatus, but also high-quality methodological tools.

And if you do not want to engage in a pleasant, but useless, self-deception in the style of “I want to see the world like this”, but you want to have a more or less objective perception, then you will not find a better Marxist (only scientific-based) methodology of knowledge.

The trouble, by the way, is that many modern “leftists” are often completely devoid of this very methodology, with the result that some of them have come to the support of the ultra-right coup in Ukraine.

The trouble of some other “leftists” is that they are sectarianly fixated on several dogmas more than a century ago, and do not perceive Marxism in its entirety, taking into account the works of all followers of Marx, who actively developed the theory and methodology, starting from Erich Fromm and ending with Immanuel Wallerstein.

Meanwhile, it is Wallerstein's world-system analysis that allows us to understand global processes occurring on the planet with piercing clarity.

There is a hegemon of the imperialist world-system (USA), there is a handful of its satellites (they are methodologically incorrect to call them allies), together they form the Center (or core) of the world-system. And there is a challenger challenger (China) and the oppressed countries of the periphery.

Applicants could also be the EU and Russia, but the EU lacks subjectivity (including due to lack of structure and excessive heterogeneity), while Russia lacks the power of the economy (it has not yet managed to recover sufficiently after the period of colonial robbery that followed destruction of the USSR).

Russia and Iran (the two countries that do this most pronounced) are trying to get out of the imperialist world-system by implementing the “mercantilist half-move”. Unlike complete isolation, which is destructive because it blocks access to new technologies, the mercantilist semi-withdrawal implies continued scientific and technical cooperation while minimizing the country's participation in disequilibrium exchange (within the WTO).

From this point of view, economic sanctions against Russia are working for Moscow in the implementation of this strategy. And Washington, on the contrary, is frankly “stupid,” because in the interests of the mechanisms of exploitation and non-equilibrium exchange, it would not only be to continue lending to the Russian economy and importing goods of a high degree of redistribution, but also to strengthen such involvement. Instead, the White House is doing everything to weaken its influence in Russia.

Surviving classic "imperial exhaustion" hegemon

a) trying to weaken potential competitors, realizing the strategy of destabilization and chaos of the planet;

b) “merges” one satellite after another, because it is already a pity for him to implement this strategy of his own resources, and is clearly not enough.

Being a satellite of the hegemon and being among the countries of the core of the world-system in such periods becomes very expensive and dangerous.

All this has been repeated many times in stories with small variations, and beautifully described by the same Wallerstein in the age-old cycles of hegemony. The only difference in the current cycle is that if previously a hegemon change usually ended with a local war (or even one battle), now, due to the increased globalization of the world-system, many more countries are involved in this process, and (as at the end of the previous cycle) hegemon "draws" a new world war.

Russia in the confrontation between the United States and China plays the role of a “golden share” that can turn the tide of events in one direction or another.

The United States, instead of trying to negotiate with the Russian elites (and theoretically it was up to the 2008 of the year), tried to “bend” them, as a result of which they themselves pushed the Russian leadership toward an alliance with China. Again, all attempts by the US to drive wedges between the Russian Federation and the EU, only strengthened China’s strategic importance for the Russian economy. We can confidently say that the leadership of the United States (starting with Bush Junior) surely failed all that one could fail, and did everything in the worst way.

Based on this, the optimal strategies of the main players look like this:

1. China’s strategy is to wait until the United States exhausts itself and weakens in confrontation with Russia and its allies (Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, etc.).

However (to the question of whether China will help in the event of a direct attack on Russia), the final fall of Russia to China is also not beneficial, because then the US will have access to Russian resources, and China will lose it. Therefore, China is more likely to intervene, but only when it sees that Russia itself cannot cope (or, alternatively, when Russia's victory will be already apparent). Last time, the United States itself used such a strategy during the First and Second World Wars.

2. Russia's strategy is also to wait until a closing window of opportunity for the United States forces Washington due to lack of time and resources to attack China, without achieving a result with Russia. Wait, giving only the minimum necessary resistance, because only this strategy will minimize the consumption of resources and human losses.

All the talk of “sofa experts” that “humiliate Russia”, “spit” somewhere and “need to bang” is either psychological immaturity at the pubertal level, or overt provocation of conscious pests playing on the side of the enemy.

Goals of the Russian leadership:

a) to lead the country with minimal losses through this extremely difficult period of its history;

b) enter the stage of ending the conflict with sufficiently strong positions to actively participate in the post-war repartition of the world (if so, what to divide).

All the rest is an empty “lyrics”, interesting only to “vyunosha with burning views” and other clinical imbeciles.

Those who first mindlessly throws themselves into a fight, usually otgrebayut most. Saakashvili can confirm.

3. The US strategy is to weaken Russia and China “at the expense of others” with the help of their satellites and puppets who are ruthlessly sent for slaughter for the sake of it (it is painful to be a puppet of the United States). And, ideally, make surrender or finish off the weak.

Georgia, as a result, has already lost part of the territory (and Saakashvili is forced to ride in Odessa, and not drink wine in Tbilisi). Egypt so far has managed a simple change of power, to a less loyal US. Ukraine has already been brought to the actual fallout into the pre-industrial phase (the “development” language does not turn to be said). Saudi Arabia is also actively merging. Next in line are the Baltic puppets and Turkey. EU countries so far suffer only economic losses, the influx of refugees and lonely terrorist attacks.

As my colleagues say, "The United States takes all its satellites in turn to make a shot in the leg." Sometimes, however, it turns out that in the head.

By a combination of economic and technological factors, the window of opportunity for the United States closes in 2018. And they are already significantly out of the schedule: Syria has been holding for two years longer than planned, and in Ukraine it was not possible to achieve the objectives set in full. So, if within a few months (up to a year) Washington fails to draw Russia into a full-scale war, then it will have to willy-nilly to switch to China. Or admit defeat and abandon claims of hegemony (which, given the degree of inadequacy in the American establishment, is extremely unlikely).

Therefore, all actions, both of Russia and its allies and opponents, should be assessed exclusively within the framework of this scenario. Minsk has allowed us to stretch for almost a year, Syria has already donated a few extra months. Time remains less and less, but the tension in the remaining months will be higher.

PS Any attempts to increase internal tension, starting with whining, defeatism and stories about “humiliation” and ending with organized liberals of Navalny with “truckers’ revolts ”, in the coming year, I personally will regard it as aiding the enemy. And in this case, it is not so important, cynical grant-eaters or “useful idiots” are attempting internal destabilization in the face of external danger. I'm sorry.

Therefore, the immediate task of any real leftists is to support the mercantilist poluuhod of Russia (the other day another step was made towards the nationalization of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, some proposals from the Glazyev program are being implemented) and alter globalization initiatives of the Russian Federation and China.

Therefore, the immediate task of the true patriots of Russia, regardless of political convictions, is to maintain calm and love for Russia.

Keep calm and love Russia.
Author:
Originator:
http://jpgazeta.ru/tseli-i-zadachi-politicheskogo-aykido-kremlya/
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hubun
    Hubun 2 December 2015 04: 53 New
    20
    After all, only less or less began to live, an affluence of which no one appeared. God forbid war, I myself, in principle, am not afraid, I have experience, I had to. Families, children, the elderly, that’s why the soul hurts
    1. Ivan Slavyanin
      Ivan Slavyanin 2 December 2015 05: 39 New
      +8
      Yes it is! But you have to sacrifice something anyway! I’ll say banality, but it’s more relevant now than ever: "If you want peace, get ready for war!" And the words of Buanoparte Napoleon about his own and alien army are also suitable for all the peoples of the world at all times!
      1. Mahmut
        Mahmut 2 December 2015 06: 15 New
        27
        One can ignore the provocations of external enemies without responding with sudden movements. But what's the point of putting up with an internal enemy that is pushing for our economy. The protest of truckers is not the machinations of enemies, but an attempt by a healthy part of the population to draw the attention of the government to a wrecking policy in the government. The author offers us all to shut up and not protest against broken roads, extorting money in hospitals and schools, and the arbitrariness of management campaigns. "After all, there is a war, and you are here about yours, about selfish."
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 2 December 2015 06: 34 New
          +2
          Quote: Mahmut
          The author suggests we all shut up and not protest against broken roads, extorting money in hospitals and schools, arbitrariness of management campaigns

          1. andj61
            andj61 2 December 2015 08: 09 New
            +2
            Yes, the author generally makes the basis of reasoning far from certain arguments:
            Based on a combination of economic and technological factors, the window of opportunity for the United States closes in 2018. And they have already significantly dropped out of the schedule: Syria has been holding on for two years longer than planned, and in Ukraine it was not possible to achieve the tasks in full. So if, within a few months (up to a year maximum), Washington fails to drag Russia into a full-blown war, then it will be forced to switch to China.

            What is the window of opportunity for the United States, which closes in 2018? Even if Russia does not rearm at all, nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles will remain. And they will not become obsolete for another twenty years! Yes, perhaps then we will not be able to conduct small effective operations outside the country and away from our borders, but for the United States, for their existence, we will still remain no less dangerous.
            And involving Russia not in a local, but in a full-scale war - unless, of course, the author under this word has what I, that is, unlimited war with the use of nuclear weapons - is not in the interests of the United States at all - this threatens destruction to the whole world. So weakening us economically and politically, drawing us into local military conflicts is in their interests, but nothing more. And the USA does not switch to China, but is engaged in it simultaneously with Russia. It's just that the conflict with China is much quieter, not noticeable, behind the scenes. Yes, this is not surprising: after all, China and the United States are very, very dependent on each other, and business is such a thing, he does not like serious noise ...
        2. Oprichnik
          Oprichnik 2 December 2015 10: 00 New
          +5
          How can one resist, let alone fight, without relying on a monolithic population loyal to power ?!
          Recently we have been stuffed with a beast against the Americans and our powerful. Which of the two pills works best? Guess three times ...
          So at the top there are enemies of Russia, for whom the commandment prevails, where there is money, there is Homeland.
          Why there is no justice! Why are liberalists, tolerasts and buggers still breathing the same air with me !?
        3. derik1970
          derik1970 2 December 2015 10: 40 New
          +3
          I think you're right. Striking government behavior. Russia is really fighting a war with the Western world, our passenger planes are being blown up, a plane is being shot down in Syria in Ukraine, they are destroying the Russian-speaking population. The situation in the country is tense, Western sanctions, and the economic and political situation are complex. Oligarchs, governors, measures of cities, any director of an enterprise behave like invaders in their own country, destroy its economy. Everyone wants to get rich. However, the state continues to tighten the noose around the neck of the population. I raise utility bills, introduce incomprehensible fees from truckers, more expensive products, gasoline and so on. And if suddenly someone was indignant at this state of affairs, then that supporter of Navalny. Complete nonsense. I think it’s clear to whom all this is beneficial! Only to the enemies of Russia. It might be worth shaking the oligarchs to fork out, but the people themselves are not ready to sacrifice their petty "prosperity" and the revolution as such is not needed.
    2. vladimirZ
      vladimirZ 2 December 2015 05: 47 New
      13
      The fact that the Marxist methodology, in its development without outdated dogmas, is the only and most correct assessment of any political and social situation, the author is right.
      We were taught in a Soviet university: “Marxism is not a dogma, but a guide to action,” to analyze and search for solutions to the problems of a constantly developing world and situation.

      In contrast to the imperialist hegemon of the United States and its “satellites”, Russia needs a strong economy, and with the liberal course of the current Russian “elite” and power, the government of liberals D. Medvedev cannot achieve it (strong economy), because again applying the same Marxist methodology, power is not supported by the people, but by a handful of fattening comprador oligarchs and officials who dream of a “worthy place” in the West, in the USA. With them in power, Russia cannot be defeated; sooner or later they will surrender Russia to the United States again.
      The people, people should understand this, and not vote for liberals in power, oligarchs and their proteges, officials, the liberal party "United Russia" and its representatives, at all levels of elections. Only then will the people be able to win, and with it Russia.
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 2 December 2015 12: 38 New
        +1
        An article on the theme “endure the Imperials”, “do not rock the boat”, and “stratechs”, meanwhile, will be pulling veins from the people, but if it’s author’s, then this is an objective necessity.
        You see, any dissatisfaction with power, the author will regard it as "aiding the enemy" ...
        Those. a state that gives the opportunity to pump out capital from the Russian Federation and pour it into the economies of enemies is not treason or aiding, but citizens who are not happy with this fact are suddenly "accomplices."
        Personally, I have no desire to unite around a gang robbing a country.
        Bold minus the article, however!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 2 December 2015 06: 31 New
      +1
      All the talk of “sofa experts” that “humiliate Russia”, “spit” somewhere and “need to bang” is either psychological immaturity at the pubertal level, or overt provocation of conscious pests playing on the side of the enemy.
      yeah ... and that means waiting for when the "decaying" America, and its shobla, will turn itself down and turn into compost, this is an ideal strategy! and
      Keep calm and love Russia.

      it’s hard to stay calm when sticking knives ...
      1. Monos
        Monos 2 December 2015 08: 44 New
        +8
        Interestingly, what kind of mystical date is this: "2018 year"?
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 2 December 2015 12: 23 New
          +1
          Quote: Monos
          Interestingly, what kind of mystical date is this: "2018 year"?

          GDP election belay
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Edvagan
        Edvagan 2 December 2015 09: 11 New
        -1
        ancient Chinese wisdom: If you have an enemy, just sit on the bank of the river and wait for the river to blow its corpse past you.
    4. Ermak
      Ermak 2 December 2015 08: 49 New
      0
      So if, within a few months (up to a year maximum), Washington fails to drag Russia into a full-blown war, then it will be forced to switch to China.

      those. will leave Russia alone to become even stronger? I doubt very much, but about China, do you mean that they are not taking it into account now? the same is doubtful.
    5. Grenader
      Grenader 2 December 2015 08: 54 New
      +2
      Quote: Hubun
      After all, only less or less began to live;

      Exactly on this and put pressure on us. America's strategy of containing Russia, including economic. They want a dumb, poor and small population to live in Russia. The material wealth of citizens is one of the engines of the economy.
    6. CONTROL
      CONTROL 2 December 2015 09: 14 New
      0
      Quote: Hubun
      After all, only less or less began to live, an affluence of which no one appeared. God forbid war, I myself, in principle, am not afraid, I have experience, I had to. Families, children, the elderly, that’s why the soul hurts

      ... never lived well, nevermind and start! ...
      ... where would it come from? it seems Shukshin ...
    7. marlin1203
      marlin1203 2 December 2015 09: 43 New
      +3
      In my opinion, the modern, pampered west after World War II has become so pained in the "colonial wars" that no one will dare to "seriously knead". They can not do anything even with their own terrorist creatures. So we should not be afraid of something serious. In fact, it’s hard to imagine that in the 30s and 40s of the last century some barmales would crush half the Middle East and dictate the rest to the “civilized world”. There are no Montgomery, Rommel or any of the Red Marshals on them.
    8. spiriolla-45
      spiriolla-45 2 December 2015 10: 20 New
      +2
      That is why, in order to avoid war, you need to prepare for it.
      And according to the article, Rogers is right in many ways, you should not be the first to get into a fight, this is stupid. The only thing is that not always, this depends on you. The GDP says so: "When you see that fights can no longer be avoided (pressed against the wall, in the gateway), it is better to attack first."
      In general, with foreign policy, everything is more or less normal, but with the domestic big questions. Why should the belt be pulled by the poor, and 1% of the population, having 50% of the country's wealth, should ride like cheese in oil. Marx, there, didn’t say anything about the sim?
  2. wandlitz
    wandlitz 2 December 2015 04: 57 New
    16
    A good friend of mine said this:
    Sanctions, objectively to the benefit of Russia. Need will make you move faster than abundance.
  3. Izotovp
    Izotovp 2 December 2015 04: 58 New
    +4
    Something a lot converges on 2018. The tension in the world is felt and history tells us that according to the historical cycle, war is on the verge.
  4. nimboris
    nimboris 2 December 2015 04: 59 New
    +7
    Exactly, it’s scary for itself, but scary for its own, but nothing, and with fright can be put on its face.
  5. venaya
    venaya 2 December 2015 04: 59 New
    +2
    some proposals from the Glazyev program are being implemented

    By their actions, the Russian leadership also forced them to switch to elements of a normal (non-colonial) economy. The article poses general, basic problems, I'm afraid that it will be difficult to immediately realize it, but it is necessary. Article (+).
    1. xtur
      xtur 2 December 2015 10: 12 New
      +2
      Whole theory world systems Valerstein is contained in the work of V. Lenin, "Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism." There it’s just about dividing the world into zones of influencein which full production cycles are realized. it world systems Wallerstein or technological zones Treasure
      In the same work, Lenin said that the division of the world into zones of influence / technological zones does not cancel the competition / struggle between them, and does not cancel the uneven development of various zones.

      Russia's strategy in the struggle of these technological zones it is quite obvious to wait until the old leader loses power, and the new one has not yet acquired and at this moment break all the bonds that limit the country's development.

      And even about these obvious findings from the struggle of technological zones and the inevitability of the transfer of power from one zone to another and the emergence of a chance for Russia at the time of the transition, Lenin once spoke.

      It is enough to recall his work, which must have been studied in Soviet times, so that the conclusions I listed would be obvious. So the article is a plus for recalling an obvious and vital strategy

      That is precisely why opponents of Russia's independence did everything to discredit Lenin's ideas and his name and removed them from the education system.
  6. Sergey333
    Sergey333 2 December 2015 05: 00 New
    +4
    All the talk of “sofa experts” that “humiliate Russia”, “spit” somewhere and “need to bang” is either psychological immaturity at the pubertal level, or overt provocation of conscious pests playing on the side of the enemy.

    This is only partially true, as soon as NATO sees the obvious weakness of the enemy they will attack. Recent statements by the NATO Secretary General confirm this (statement on a hybrid war against Turkey). They will attack not in the form of a direct invasion, but as a possible scenario - they will massively send troops to Ukraine and close the Black Sea straits. Ie they will do everything so that Russia would have to attack itself. So what if there is an ace in the sleeve - n.r. in the form of climate weapons, it’s time to use it, then it will be too late ...
  7. Sasha75
    Sasha75 2 December 2015 05: 02 New
    0
    You will not be fooled 90 remember.
  8. aszzz888
    aszzz888 2 December 2015 05: 02 New
    +2
    Therefore, the immediate task of the true patriots of Russia, regardless of political convictions, is to maintain calm and love for Russia.


    The article is correct. +
    I would add to the author’s last quote: And a tough defense of one’s interests, before any one was not an adversary.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 2 December 2015 05: 46 New
      +5
      Quote: aszzz888
      Therefore, the immediate task of the true patriots of Russia, regardless of political convictions, is to maintain calm and love for Russia.

      TOTALLY FOR !!! And then who is rocking the boat: truckers, gas prices, rising food prices, utilities? Privatization continues .... It seems that the fifth column was given the FAS command!
  9. Bayonet
    Bayonet 2 December 2015 05: 05 New
    +1
    “All the talk of“ couch experts ”that“ Russia is being humiliated ”, is“ spit ”and“ needs to be fucked up ”is either psychological immaturity at the puberty level, or frank provocation of conscious pests playing on the side of the enemy."
    Everything is much simpler, this is the second of Russia's eternal disasters. hi
    1. andj61
      andj61 2 December 2015 08: 15 New
      +1
      Quote: Bayonet
      Everything is much simpler, this is the second of Russia's eternal disasters.

      The first trouble is fools, and the second is roads. Do you mean roads? what
      Or is it the first trouble? wink
      PS
      The statement "Russia has two troubles - fools and roads" is most often attributed to Gogol (less often to Saltykov-Shchedrin, Karamzin, etc.).
  10. ProtectRusOrDie
    ProtectRusOrDie 2 December 2015 05: 19 New
    +3
    Quote: Bayonet
    “All the talk of“ couch experts ”that“ Russia is being humiliated ”, is“ spit ”and“ needs to be fucked up ”is either psychological immaturity at the puberty level, or frank provocation of conscious pests playing on the side of the enemy."
    Everything is much simpler, this is the second of Russia's eternal disasters. hi


    Dear, and you yourself, by chance, do not refer to the second "trouble"? The question about the seed - who is the person who prefers to call his fellow citizens “the second trouble”, instead of the objective assessment of the scarcely past 90s and their detrimental effect on the people, the complexity of the current state of affairs (the First World Economic after all), and just a human understanding of pain , fear, frustration of ordinary people (for objective reasons, again)?

    On warm, or just adequate words - "the mouth does not turn"?

    Disgusting
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 2 December 2015 05: 23 New
    +4
    The article recalled the reason why gasoline or buckwheat is getting more expensive. The conclusion is to sit and wait until the enemies themselves have a break. Shall we wait?
    1. Oprychnik
      Oprychnik 2 December 2015 06: 36 New
      +5
      A couple of “pseudo-crazy” words about Marxism, the angry denunciation of “couch strategists” and the final conclusion = time works for us. The wise gudgeon ...
    2. trantor
      trantor 2 December 2015 19: 29 New
      0
      Quote: Seraphimamur
      The conclusion is to sit and wait until the enemies themselves have a break.

      The author did not say this. Here is another: the economical use of resources and time, causing maximum damage with minimal resources. Those. exposure at the right time and place.
      Quote: Seraphimamur
      Shall we wait?

      Rather endure. We have a pain threshold higher. Historically.
  13. Wolka
    Wolka 2 December 2015 05: 28 New
    +2
    sometimes a similar philosophy begins to strain ...
  14. Zomanus
    Zomanus 2 December 2015 05: 31 New
    0
    In short, our business is to hold on.
    Inflate the military, both in terms of production capacity,
    as well as the availability of new / modernized weapons.
    Restore the system of civil defense and emergency situations in terms of training the population
    and facilities / logistics.
    Inflate early detection system. to control
    could fly / approach to our country from all directions.
  15. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 2 December 2015 05: 32 New
    +3
    Well, I’m not ashamed that the puberty is not far from me. I asked questions, tried, understood, considered, asked. It’s good that there are people who can explain here and who explained patiently. By the time of the article, it had all become clear. But the fact is that emotions are in the forefront of many people. It’s not necessary that these are all traitors. Just emotionally all are different and knowledge at all at different levels. Do not stigmatize, but explain.
    After all, there were a lot of emotional comments, and there were a lot of ++++++ to those comments.
    1. faridg7
      faridg7 2 December 2015 14: 37 New
      +1
      You want to say that I flattened my Turk in vain? Is it all unnecessary emotions? But the author of this article would not want to explain to the families of the deceased pilot and sailor, looking into their eyes, that everything is developing exactly according to Marx, and that there is no need for unnecessary emotions?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 4 December 2015 00: 38 New
      0
      I thought for a long time about the author’s words. My case is that so far I have managed to hide my first and most powerful emotions from people. In general, a quick understanding comes from emotions: one’s --- someone else’s. And then --- thoughts. This is normal, because emotions can warn of danger when there are no thoughts yet.
      AUTHOR NOT RIGHT, speaking of traitors and TWICE NOT RIGHT, because it is clear that at that moment he himself experienced strong emotions !!
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 4 December 2015 00: 53 New
        0
        I want to add that, I assume that the AUTHOR, as a creative, emotional, sensitive person, can foresee, speaking of 2018, well, + and - are possible. If you recall 1917, it was the creative people who felt more sharply that it would be. I do not quote from memory ,I'm afraid to make a mistake.
  16. SPACE
    SPACE 2 December 2015 05: 32 New
    +1
    "The United States, in turn, forces all of its satellites to shoot itself in the foot." Sometimes, however, it turns out that in the head.

    Yes, if the United States can’t shoot at Russia, then you need to bend your sixes and part-time economic partners of Russia and make them shoot at themselves ...
    Any attempts to increase internal tension, starting with whining, defeatism and stories about “humiliation” and ending with “riots of truckers” organized by Navalny’s liberals, in the coming year I will personally regard as aiding the enemy. And in this case, it’s not so important, cynical grant-eaters or “useful” ones make attempts at internal destabilization in the face of external danger. I'm sorry.

    Better late than never, people are slowly gaining insight, although I believe that the government of the Russian Federation knew this and always understood it, the obviousness of the strategy is obvious, but as for the average man selflessly busy with his small and selfish Wishlist, well, in fact they still have the thought and understanding of sovereign tasks a hat for a senka ...
    The article is good, medical, prevention of mental disorders, for useful and useless, red and white and in general all other idiots ...
  17. aba
    aba 2 December 2015 05: 54 New
    +3
    although I believe that the government of the Russian Federation always knew this and understood it, the obviousness of the strategy is obvious

    Alas ... But nevertheless, some steps make everyone doubt it ... If it is still not quite correct to speak about the collapse of the economy, then reforms in education and then in medicine began much later. Well, the fact that the article in the Constitution about ideology was not even discussed, and not that change.
    Something like this...
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 2 December 2015 06: 37 New
      -2
      Put yourself in their place and think, evaluate a set of factors, conduct an analysis to identify opportunities, look at it from different perspectives, consider the human mentality, pass it through the prism of geopolitical problems, just don’t lie to yourself and you can get a solution to any question , check the watch and compare it with the results of those in whom you doubt ...
      Ideology should be born among the masses and at the same time be one for all, and then you will govern EVERYTHING. Helpless people demand ideology, just as blind men need a guide, religion and ideology are opium for the people, a whip and a gingerbread man. Do you really believe that being decent, etc. do people lack ideology? or after the state has declared ideological dogmas, everything will fall into place, the economy will work, and students will learn better ... Naively
      1. alecsis69
        alecsis69 2 December 2015 10: 43 New
        +1
        Give at least one example when ideology was born among the masses.
        1. SPACE
          SPACE 2 December 2015 11: 15 New
          0
          Quote: alecsis69
          Give at least one example when ideology was born among the masses.

          History does not know such examples, always someone considered himself smarter, campaigning for others. But this is not an indicator, for example, Faith lives in everyone, why shouldn’t the Ideology be settled there, always something is done in the first.
          1. alecsis69
            alecsis69 4 December 2015 10: 03 New
            0
            Faith lives in many, but is brought to the masses by few ascetics.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  18. Lysik001
    Lysik001 2 December 2015 05: 56 New
    +2
    I always read this author with pleasure and always agreed with him. But not today. Calling people fools and provocateurs just for what they think differently? I do not consider this position correct. Moreover. You start to relate to the author differently. He justifies the (spineless) position of Russia! Yes, I think so! And I'm not and not a pest. Our inaction on the attacks of Turkey .... I consider a crime against my people! It is this inaction that will untie their hands and can lead to a great war! Those. when a forceful act of aggression is followed by some obscene sanctions ..... wait for a new disaster! Because impunity did not bring to good. Nerd you are our beloved!
    1. Jozhkin Cat
      Jozhkin Cat 2 December 2015 06: 31 New
      -1
      Vlasov, Hitler, they also thought differently ...
    2. SPACE
      SPACE 2 December 2015 06: 52 New
      +3
      Quote: Lysik001
      just for what they think differently

      You are all different, some require an ideology, others want to have their own opinion, neither of them at the same time do not notice the contradictions.
      As for aggression, the author correctly said that you have to go through with minimal losses, measure seven times, cut once, and don’t need to wave your mind with a saber.
      Z.Y. opinion is right or wrong, usually wrong among fools ...
    3. oleg46
      oleg46 2 December 2015 09: 32 New
      +1
      Very nice comment! Thanks you! good
    4. Infernal man
      Infernal man 2 December 2015 10: 28 New
      -1
      this is exactly what many here are trying to convey to the author, according to whom everything is arranged exactly as it seems to him. And all who think differently are enemies and i-diots.
      I also always read it with pleasure, but this opus is too much.
  19. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 2 December 2015 06: 05 New
    +1
    For example, I agree to suffer until the 2018 year (a la ger com a la ger). But I am interested in the question, what if nothing ends then?
  20. 3officer
    3officer 2 December 2015 06: 10 New
    +4
    Goals and objectives of the "political aikido" of the Kremlin


    Aikido implies using the enemy’s strength against himself, as far as I remember. And now there is boxing, with Russia acting as a clear “second” number. Sparring our country conducts like a true gentleman observing absolutely all the rules, but the enemy constantly hits below the waist and in addition to this, the opponent’s massage therapists periodically climb into the ring to knock on the kidneys from behind. We clearly don’t need such aikid!
  21. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 2 December 2015 06: 12 New
    +3
    The US is in a hurry to destroy its satellites! Incomprehensible pressure in all directions, as if they were in a hurry somewhere! Already in terms of 2018, this is probably overkill, of course, but it’s clear that they are ruining the fever. But it turns out clumsily, with losses, not just as they feared and could turn out not only against the USA, but also against all of Europe, including Turkey. In general, any plans and calculations in geopolitics are unacceptable! Because any task to drive a dog out of the house can turn into a ruined house and a broken leg! And the dog will be fine ... America is now getting something similar. Each step aggravates their position.
  22. ratcatcher
    ratcatcher 2 December 2015 06: 15 New
    +6
    Wallerstein's “world-system analysis” by Rogers, as usual, presents a very vulgar and shallow interpretation, either ignorance of the topic or intentional silence.
    Actually, Wallerstein himself points out that within the framework of the existing world-system, a change in the center and the periphery does not occur. And in his theory, the change of the world-system is not developed at all. Since earlier, according to his theory, there were world-empires and world-economies. And the world-system appeared relatively recently. And in his theory, hegemon change does not provide.
    It is too early to say in the current conditions that the world-system will be replaced by some new one.
    The world of system analysis also knows other names - Arrigi, Frank, Samir Amin. And they look at the question differently than Wallerstein.
    Amin, by the way, stands on solid Marxist positions and has devoted much to the theory of dependence.
    As for Russia, it is a country of half-periphery, and it was the same before the revolution.
    And the period when she was the second country in the world is the period of the USSR. This was achieved at the cost of great sacrifices and a fundamental change in the socio-political model.
    The fact that Rogers, pretending to be “left-wing”, is silent about this, and is trying to portray that semi-peripheral Russia in its current state can claim some kind of redrawing of the world-system, its destruction and the creation of a new world-system, this is frank noodles.
    Before claiming for something, Russia should not "cross over", but rather overcome its position as a country of "dependent development". And for this we need a change in the socio-political system of Russia, which is not yet and is not expected. Including because there is no sane opposition that could do this.
    For the rest, I do not even want to comment.
    The window of opportunity for the United States will close in 2018! Awesome. I would justify it.
    About the "truckers riots" is generally gorgeous. That is, the fact that Navalny was attached to this hot topic negates the validity of the protest? Rogers, how does the true “left” stand up for big business here? Yeah, Rogers is a real left “left."
    Something tired of writing further about these Rogers exercises.
    1. 3officer
      3officer 2 December 2015 06: 34 New
      +4
      [quote = ratcatcher] "
      The window of opportunity for the United States will close in 2018! Awesome. I would justify it.
      About the "truckers riots" is generally gorgeous. That is, the fact that Navalny was attached to this hot topic negates the validity of the protest?


      The indignation of drivers is justified and fair, but the fact that these gentlemen (Navalny and his team) do not miss the opportunity to "sit on the tail" of any indignation in society is also a fact. They wanted to spit on justice and infringement on the rights of ordinary people (Khimki plants, etc.) these "movements" use them exclusively for self-promotion and in their selfish interests. And the government should think about the fact that by "winning" a penny on these requisitions, they will lose the country.
      1. varov14
        varov14 2 December 2015 13: 23 New
        +1
        Why social protests are used by “skaters”, because they are in power and make politics. Now they are tearing one skin, they will finally seize power for themselves again, and they will tear two. One they are, another transnational corporations.
    2. Berber
      Berber 2 December 2015 08: 56 New
      0
      That is, the topic is not disclosed? In my opinion, everything is very logical, despite the wrong links.
    3. varov14
      varov14 2 December 2015 13: 38 New
      0
      Rogers, this is just another storyteller, Prokhanov has at least a profession. No matter where you throw some storytellers — right, left, liberals, clergy, power — you can hardly drag it up, or skid down, the mountain and continuous zigzags, it is impossible to navigate in an extreme situation.
  23. Beard31
    Beard31 2 December 2015 06: 27 New
    +5
    So much water, in order to explain why we still do not bomb Turkey. And why in the country a complete ass in all spheres of life. The author did not say anything other than the fact that those who see that the king is naked, smeared the zenki with green paint and pray to the government for a corner.))))
  24. LEX SU
    LEX SU 2 December 2015 06: 46 New
    -2
    really enjoyed it.
    everything is well painted.
    we will see ...
    1. varov14
      varov14 2 December 2015 13: 14 New
      -1
      And I really liked it, the reformers we have are tough guys, always to the point, everything is up to the mind, but now I don’t understand, what are they crying about oil prices?
  25. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 2 December 2015 06: 52 New
    +3
    Interesting .. I read almost all the comments are negative, but who is so actively putting her pluses?
    Tired of already silly assaults - sofa marshals, etc. etc. Rogers (the second after Ivanov, a patriotic surname ..) - in general, this is your fertile soil otherwise for whom you will ... write?
    How ur shout we patriots as disagreement - sofa marshal, strategist, etc. ..,
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 2 December 2015 09: 09 New
      +1
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      Interesting .. I read almost all the comments are negative, but who is so actively putting her pluses?
      Tired of already silly assaults - sofa marshals, etc. etc. Rogers (the second after Ivanov, a patriotic surname ..) - in general, this is your fertile soil otherwise for whom you will ... write?
      How ur shout we patriots as disagreement - sofa marshal, strategist, etc. ..,

      Namesake! Sorry, but after such articles and comments, reluctance to write. The author himself does not understand what he writes.
  26. guzik007
    guzik007 2 December 2015 07: 54 New
    0
    and Russia does not have enough economic power (it has not yet managed to recover sufficiently after the period of colonial robbery that followed the destruction of the USSR)
    -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
    ---------------------------
    the author, but is there enough analysis ability? The potential for restoring Russia's economic power was put in full swing at a time when agreements on accession to the IMF were signed in the Kremlin.
  27. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 2 December 2015 08: 06 New
    +3
    I agree with the author as a whole. Now there is a serious imbalance of the target in the hegemon. It has already become clear that the theory of rampant consumption is suitable only for the hegemon, and very limitedly for everyone else. And the rest are already tired of paying for the sweet life of the "island". Yes, with longing, remember the Chinese proverb: "God forbid you live in an era of change!"
    1. varov14
      varov14 2 December 2015 13: 05 New
      0
      You have mixed up the concepts, the hegemon always wants one worthy life for himself and his offspring and doesn’t even pretend to be excesses, but all the others are imprisoned for free, but they try to present it as achievements.
  28. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 2 December 2015 08: 12 New
    +5
    The author is a typical conjuncturist, and also very superficial!

    The message is clear - the government and the oligarchy are fucking the Russian people, and we must remain calm.
    Okay, we won’t go into geopolitics - so put things in order inside our country so that we sit on the priest exactly. Can't or don't want to?
    Then such actions as truckers will be more and more, and their enemies will lead them, so do not hesitate.
    1. Berber
      Berber 2 December 2015 08: 53 New
      0
      Give Revolution! Land for peasants, factories for workers, etc.
      1. varov14
        varov14 2 December 2015 12: 58 New
        +1
        Trade to entrepreneurs, but under the supervision of the public. Local authorities - to local self-government bodies, again controlled by the public. Give the folk "veche".
  29. Berber
    Berber 2 December 2015 08: 36 New
    -1
    Quote: Hubun
    After all, only less or less began to live, an affluence of which no one appeared. God forbid war, I myself, in principle, am not afraid, I have experience, I had to. Families, children, the elderly, that’s why the soul hurts

    A very good article. In general - patience to all.
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 2 December 2015 09: 09 New
      0
      Quote: BerBer
      In general - patience to all.

      Wrong, no patience and tolirance, with idiocy, with ignorance, with rudeness, with unscrupulousness, arrogance, injustice, lies and all other vices in society, people, and the authorities are irreconcilable to fight because of their capabilities. A wish is better than sobriety, objectivity and intelligence, and after understanding the goals and what is happening, indulgence in the imperfection of this world itself will come.
    2. varov14
      varov14 2 December 2015 12: 52 New
      +1
      Life is good, and beautiful life is even better. God tolerated and commanded us. The woman tolerated, endured, and put it on the pitchfork.
  30. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 2 December 2015 09: 06 New
    +2
    Or I overlooked something. I quote: (the other day another step was taken towards the nationalization of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, some proposals from the Glazyev program are being implemented). I would like to know what step towards the nationalization of the Central Bank was made and what proposals from the Glazyev program are being implemented. Leaving the author on the conscience of setting a time frame (2017, and I would like to know what will happen and in what form), I would like to understand how to take a wait-and-see attitude, leaving the economic front open for enemy sabotage (evidence - offshore, dollar speculation, integration into the world economy on a dollar basis, a flat scale of taxes, reliance on the comprador bourgeoisie).
    1. varov14
      varov14 2 December 2015 12: 45 New
      0
      “the proposals from the Glazyev’s program are being implemented.” - I heard whether it will be, or if Mr. Kudrin already has the role of Putin’s adviser - this is a Trojan donkey - a “shield” on the path of American sanctions, the elite is tired, Putin went to meet him.
  31. Basil50
    Basil50 2 December 2015 09: 08 New
    0
    The analysis of the situation cannot be liked by mercenaries and simply bought, they let the program down and they work it out. This is not written for them. Forecasting the future is always difficult, even in the family. Thank you for trying to explain your position on the policy of the government of RUSSIA from the perspective of logic and just common sense. There are questions and answers are not always obvious, but thanks to the author, it makes me think.
  32. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 2 December 2015 09: 51 New
    +1
    I quote: Goals of the Russian leadership:

    a) to lead the country with minimal losses through this extremely difficult period of its history;

    b) enter the stage of ending the conflict with strong enough positions to actively participate in the post-war redistribution of the world (if there is something to share)
    .
    Good goals. But how can one “get to the stage of ending the conflict with sufficiently strong positions”, allowing the enemy to be behind. Example: resolution of currency speculation in the market. Putin, at a meeting with the people, shied away from a direct answer to the question WHY US FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPECULARS. He only pointedly remarked that they were not those, but some special speculators. Yes, not those. A speculator in the Crimean bazaar, reselling candles "turns" at best tens of thousands, but rubles, and SKOTINA, most often living overseas, speculating with currency on the Moscow stock exchange, is turning over millions, but if he is lucky, he will take them out to the enemy’s den, and if it fails, it will not peel off either. So what for, we have such a schedule?
  33. Infernal man
    Infernal man 2 December 2015 10: 24 New
    -1
    Quote: No one
    There is a lot of pathos, but in fact, in the end, one bunch. Atheists love to talk about scientific methodology, paradigm, objective scientific principles, but as soon as it comes to scientific research and evidence, the frog is solemnly opened and pathos declares that the soul is not found, therefore it is not exists as an objective phenomenon. Curtain. What we see in this article is the same. What is the Marxist methodology in this article? Yes, nothing. Why did Rogers decide that the ultimate goal of the patriots should be to keep calm ?? ? He has no idea what patriotism is !!! The highest value of a patriot is not even his love for his homeland, but the national interests of the people and the state. Rogers is a typical liberal who speculates on patriotic rhetoric. I have generally concerns about him mental health. For example:
    Quote: Rogers
    if within a few months (up to a year maximum) Washington does not succeed in drawing Russia into a full-scale war,
    , is paranoia, a mania of persecution. Why did Rogers decide that the State Department wants to drag the Russian Federation into the war ??? I do not see any point at all. If the State Department really wanted a big war with the Russian Federation, then he would have been able for a long time to fulfill his goal, under some false pretext.
    Quote: Rogers
    personally, I will regard it as aiding the enemy
    -This can only be declared by a person suffering from delusions of grandeur. But who cares, what is there and how the freelance liberal will regard it.
    Quote: Rogers
    Surviving classic "imperial exhaustion" hegemon
    What is this depletion and weakness manifested in? In my opinion, the United States is currently at the peak of its power. Also, since 2014, liberals have been burying Ukraine intensively, like it is about to fall apart and all the hohliki will come running to us. For this, the liberals adhere to this In order to justify the passive liberal course of government. Nothing will happen by itself, it is necessary to change the course of government from liberal to patriotic. Liberals scare us all with the Third World War. The Su-24 and Mi-8 were shot down, two Russian military personnel were killed, the Russian government was limited only to defensive measures. Will these actions stop the expansion of aggression by NATO? And if Turkey invades Syria under some sort of either a pretext and destroy the VKS group in Syria and overthrow the Assad government. What will be the actions of the liberal government of the Russian Federation in this case? Well, the maximum will break diplomatic relations with Turkey, express categorical protest and all, swallow a bitter pill. One Roman patrician said: if you bear one insult you will certainly get a lot of them. If the Russian Federation decided to become a geopolitical player: actions in the Crimea, Donbass and Syria, then you need to be prepared to respond with a blow to a blow, as it was in South Ossetia in 2008, otherwise our inaction can only aggravate the situation, strengthen the aggressor in own impunity and inspire him to expand aggression.

    just read the article and wanted to write the same thing. You got ahead of me.
    It is also worth noting, just described by the author, his inherent youthful maximalism and rejection of any thinking and attitudes other than his, what is happening. In addition, also aggressively boorish.
  34. varov14
    varov14 2 December 2015 12: 32 New
    +1
    Goals of the Russian leadership:

    a) to lead the country with minimal losses through this extremely difficult period of its history;

    b) go to the stage of ending the conflict with strong enough positions to actively participate in the post-war redistribution of the world (if there is something to share) .--- Whoever is against it, all the more wisely everything must be done, measure it seven times - cut one. But when there are hidden enemies and provocateurs among advisers, hardly goals are possible. One person is not able to separate the grain from the chaff. We need a core of comrades-in-arms, like-minded people, but it seems that it cannot organize itself in any way, otherwise it would grow at least in arithmetic progression. Years go by, the business is somehow worth it, the twentieth century would have lived at such a pace, and scientific and technological progress is moving by leaps and bounds, a clear imbalance, you can lose everything.
  35. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 2 December 2015 13: 06 New
    -1
    According to the same "Marxist methodology": practice is the criterion of truth.
    Leftists claim that their teaching is the only true one and the future lies with it, while liberals and democrats are the fiend of hell. The truth and the right claim the same thing about the left. What do we see in practice? The left is constantly messing up, like the right, no less tears and grief from them, and in the final the exact same crisis. At the moment, the left has retained its power only in a couple of reserves under the control of dictatorships, China does not believe it, it has long been integrated into capitalist commodity-money relations, and politics will soon catch up.
    Therefore, that the left, that the right are the same thing, are conditional political movements, the goal is the enslavement and exploitation of peoples in the interests of a narrow group of "leaders" and have no fundamental differences.
    Practice shows that if the goal of state administrators is to improve the life of the people and strengthen the influence of the country, the political system can be any, ultra-right dictatorships cope with the task as effectively as ultra-democratic or communist regimes. And if the basis is the exploitation and infringement of the rights of the people, then everything ends the same way for everyone, no matter how it is called and no matter what clothes they wear.
    Conclusion, when someone begins to rub people, what he needs to do from the point of view of the so-called left, or the so-called right, you just need to carefully monitor the speaker’s hands, your wallet and get ready for the worst.
  36. The Chat
    The Chat 2 December 2015 14: 49 New
    +1
    Quote: aszzz888
    And a tough defense of their interests, before some were not an adversary.

    This is just not enough for now.
    More and more they are trying to defend their interests according to Leopoldowski - "Guys, let's live together!"
    And the "guys" absolutely do not want to.
  37. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 2 December 2015 15: 24 New
    +3
    I put a minus to the article and here are the reasons:
    1. It seems that the beginning was encouraged by "Marxist methodology and so on", and in fact - a custom article to support the pants of the current incapacitated Russian elite (both the one in power now and the one in another place) that tried to rock the boat after 2008 with its concepts in the "big world", she immediately received a nose from serious uncles in charge of world money and now reflects offense (interferes in dubious wars, begins to be friends with centuries-old enemies, restores ties with former "friends", etc.).
    2. What does this author preach: DO NOT RIP about all left-wing patriots and do nothing because the priority "is to maintain calm and love for Russia." That's the way and no other way. Let it go on, the stupid thief who has not learned ANYTHING for 25 years to rule the country, the elite (I just want to quote that word) continues to calmly download cheaply the country's resources (oil and gas) over a hill, ruin their industry and agriculture, hide human money from Russian people in “funds” under foreign jurisdiction.

    In a word, BRAVO AUTHOR is the best way to end this territory (Russia) and not come up with. I believe that the only way to survive in this geopolitical situation is to MAKE THE ELITE MOBILIZE THE COUNTRY to restore economic potential, agriculture, and most importantly IDEOLOGY (do not need communism, do not need socialism, EVERYTHING is PLEASANT, for which the masses of people will go). If the elite does not begin mobilization, either Slavic civilization (like the Indians in the United States) will disappear, or someone will sweep away the current stupid elite and fulfill the tasks of mobilization, and perhaps be able to prevent a REAL THREAT TO DISASTER.
  38. LCA
    LCA 2 December 2015 21: 20 New
    0
    The main question of practical wisdom is the question of predictability of consequences.

    The law of "denial of negation" in Marxism is the birthmark of the Biblical doctrine of the enslavement of all to creative transformation.

    Development is a series of transformations based on internal and external algorithms in the interaction of different qualities.

    The Marxist term “social division of labor” is also harmful. In society, in its production and distribution activities, there is a union of the labor of many individuals, but not a division of labor among them. The process of combining labor really has a component that can be called professional specialization and separation of professions (division and separation of crafts). If we agree with the term “social division of labor”, then it will create a separation of people in society.

    The slurredness of Marxism on the issue of management processes allows us to hide from the awareness of societies the driven nature of the global historical process.

    The philosophy of Marxism - the so-called "dialectical materialism" - is an exercise of its founders in logic without axioms and rules, built on defaults, the meaning of which does not correspond to Objective reality. As a result of this, it cripples the intellect of those who regard it as a holistic, scientific worldview, and serves to protect against revision by the free mind of the nonsense contained in Marxism, in particular, the purely applied nonsense of its political economy. Although there are true provisions in it, but in the general system of Marxism they fulfill the function of bait, and not the foundation for further development.

    Any scientific philosophy - regardless of the intentions of its founders and the awareness of professional philosophers and adherents-lovers of this objective fact - takes on the role of a tuning fork (more precisely, a tuning fork system), according to which its adherents can adjust the algorithm of their psyche (or they can only declare the setting without making it out of inability or unwillingness).

    Philosophy itself, having solved the problem of tuning the psyche algorithms to solve the problems of everyday life, then flows into the activity of a person, losing its specific forms.

    Dialectics, as a method of comprehending objective truth by posing certain questions and receiving specific answers to them.
  39. LCA
    LCA 2 December 2015 21: 24 New
    -1
    When viewed from the perspective of a fairly general theory of management on the life of societies over historically long time intervals (hundreds or more years), the means of influencing society, the meaningful application of which allows you to manage its life and death, are:

    1. Information of a worldview nature, a methodology, mastering which, people build - individually and publicly - their “standard automatisms” for recognizing particular processes in the completeness and integrity of Life and determine in their perception their hierarchical ordering in mutual nesting. It is the basis of the culture of thinking and the fullness of managerial activity, including intra-social sovereignty.

    2. Information of the annalistic, chronological, nature of all branches of Culture and all branches of Knowledge. It allows you to see the direction of the flow of processes and correlate with each other the private branches of Culture as a whole and the branches of Knowledge. In the possession of a Life-compatible worldview, based on a sense of proportion, it allows one to distinguish private processes, perceiving a “chaotic” stream of facts and phenomena into a worldview “sieve” - a subjective human measure of recognition.

    3. Factual and descriptive information: a description of private processes and their interactions is the essence of information of the third priority, which includes the teachings of religious cults, secular ideologies, technologies and factology of all branches of science.

    4. Economic processes, as a means of influence, subordinated to purely informational means of influence through finances (money), which are an extremely generalized type of information of an economic nature.

    5. The means of genocide, affecting not only living people, but also subsequent generations, destroying the genetically determined potential for the development and development of the cultural heritage of their ancestors: nuclear blackmail - the threat of use; alcohol, tobacco and other narcotic genocide, food additives, all environmental pollutants, some medicines, cosmetics and perfumes - real use; “Genetic engineering” and “biotechnology” are potential hazards.

    6. Other means of influence, mainly power, are weapons in the traditional sense of the word, killing and mutilating people, destroying and destroying the material and technical objects of civilization, material cultural monuments and carriers of their spirit.
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. LCA
    LCA 2 December 2015 21: 27 New
    0
    Liberalism is not immoral, as many people now think in Russia, but it has a specific morality, although it is unrighteous and cruel in most of its manifestations, which liberals perceive as the norm of life.

    This means that policies pursued since the early 1920s. in all bourgeois-liberal societies of Europe, in the USA and around the world, the essence of which is the introduction as a norm of life of sexual perversions, drugs, various immoralities, virtual impunity for crimes up to the abolition of the death penalty even for the most serious crimes, and other “tolerance” - in reality does not express the ideals of liberalism.

    It is aimed at transforming liberalism into permissiveness by bringing liberalism to the point of absurdity with the goal of self-liquidating the kind of capitalism that has developed on the basis of bourgeois-liberal ideology.

    From the middle of the XNUMXth century, the world behind the scenes attempted to solve the task of eliminating bourgeois-liberal capitalism with the help of Marxism, but could not and now it is being solved by other means. At first, in the first three decades of the existence of the USSR, this policy of the spread of immorality in the countries of bourgeois democracy was an auxiliary means complementing the Marxist project. Its purpose was to ensure the attractiveness of the Soviet way of life on the basis of Marxism-Leninism against the backdrop of degradation and the moral and ethical decomposition of capitalist societies.

    But after I.V. Stalin pronounced a death sentence on Marxism and, in particular, after the collapse of the USSR as a result of the country surrendering the party-KGB nomenclature to the liberal bourgeoisies of the United States, this tool became the main tool for eliminating bourgeois liberalism and the culture it generated - at this stage of history: liberalism brought to the point of absurdity turns into permissiveness and dooms self-destruction to it of committed societies under the influence of biological and sociocultural laws of life, which these societies and their ruling "elite" ignore or do not suspect of their existence.

    After the collapse of the USSR, Russia also began to be drawn into this process of self-destruction in debauchery. So the “world backstage” is clearing the area for the implementation of a new global civilization project based on biomass, which should replace the indigenous European peoples and the historically formed nations of Australia and post-Columbian America.

    At the same time, objective laws - biological and sociocultural - that societies ignore or do not suspect of their existence, are used as weapons in the ANONYMOUS war to destroy them.

    And although liberalism used this kind of means in the Cold War to destroy the post-Stalin party-nomenclature USSR (SNB Directive 20/1 of 18.08.1948/XNUMX/XNUMX and the notorious Dulles Plan), but he himself is defenseless against them.
  42. Freeman
    Freeman 3 December 2015 01: 17 New
    +1
    Quote: Monos
    Interestingly, what kind of mystical date is this: "2018 year"?


    FM-2018 on football. We have no matter how the Olympics (2008; 2014), it seems that the whole leadership goes to the nearest sports bar to "get sick" and drink beer, forgetting about work.

    Quote: ratcatcher
    "... About the" truckers riots "is generally gorgeous. That is, the fact that Navalny was attached to this hot topic nullifies the justice of the protest?


    So this is such a technology of "those in power" to "drain" protests. First, it was tested at the Manege - pulled the Natsik. Then they brought up the “mink opposition” to Sakharov. Then on the “Swamp” with the help of “radicals”. And as the apotheosis - "Maidan".
    1. Sling cutter
      Sling cutter 3 December 2015 01: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: Freeman
      So this is such a technology of "those in power" to "drain" protests.

      Well done, Volunteer, to the very point said. good 10500
      Any disagreeing person, any protest movement, the movement quickly gets muddy, labels are hung on it and turned into a rogue, completely changing concepts.
      But sooner or later they will become ...