Military Review

UN announces "temporary truce" in one of the areas of Homs

52
Starting today, a temporary truce has been declared in Homs (Syria). About this reported channel www.almayadeen.net. It turns out that a special UN mission "persuaded" the militants to leave one of the districts of the city, namely al-Waer, and move to other provinces of Syria - to start in Idlib. We are talking about about three thousand representatives of various terrorist groups, including militants "Dzhebhat al-Nusra."


UN announces "temporary truce" in one of the areas of Homs


The channel went on material in which it is reported that the Syrian government army must "wait" for at least two months - until the militants leave the city. The material states that this will allow to avoid civilian casualties. During this time, al-Waer, which is the last militant-controlled area of ​​Homs, must be delivered humanitarian aid.

Earlier this practice has already taken place. In 2013, the UN missionaries also “persuaded” some militants to leave some localities in Homs province, however, first, not all militants agreed, and second, it was strange that after the truce, militants of one terrorist organization were simply replaced by militants other. The provinces of “Dzhebhat an-Nusra” have strengthened.

In this case, several hundred representatives of the same "al-Nusra", as it turns out, did not accept the "proposals" of the UN special representatives and intend to continue to resist the SAR armed forces in the city. How and to whom in such conditions all the same humanitarian supplies will be delivered through the UN, not specified.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 1 December 2015 06: 40
    25
    In my opinion, Negotiations with terrorists are unacceptable, they must be destroyed, wherever they try to raise their heads.
    1. IGMIT
      IGMIT 1 December 2015 07: 00
      +5
      Correct war to a victorious end, and no armistice only unconditional surrender.
    2. vkfriendly
      vkfriendly 1 December 2015 07: 02
      0
      This is not your opinion - it is a common world practice.
      1. ism_ek
        ism_ek 1 December 2015 07: 24
        -3
        Quote: vkfriendly
        This is not your opinion - it is a common world practice.

        Give at least one example from world practice. The war of annihilation is the road to nowhere. Destroy the irreconcilable. With those who are ready to talk, you need to talk.
        In the city, in underground tunnels, it is much more difficult to destroy the irreconcilable than in the sparsely populated expanses of Itlib.
        Only 700 foreign mercenaries will leave. The locals lay down their arms.
        http://ria.ru/syria_chronicle/20151130/1333051659.html
        1. IGMIT
          IGMIT 1 December 2015 08: 06
          +7
          It is hard to believe that someone will lay down their arms, remember the first Chechen war. How many such "truces" were there at the right time. Only complete victory!
          1. ism_ek
            ism_ek 1 December 2015 10: 27
            -3
            Kadyrov, a former terrorist, in power - do you think this is a complete victory?
          2. ism_ek
            ism_ek 1 December 2015 12: 43
            -1
            The current strength of the Syrian army is 150 thousand people. (before the Civil War there were 300 thousand and 10 million reservists) Of these, no more than 30 thousand combat-ready, fully loyal to Assad. Assad represents a minority of the Syrian population. One cannot win a complete victory with such an army. It is necessary to negotiate with local clans. Divide and conquer.
            Isil did not advance so much through battle, but because of the ability to negotiate.
        2. andj61
          andj61 1 December 2015 08: 11
          +2
          Quote: ism_ek
          Give at least one example from world practice. The war of annihilation is the road to nowhere. Destroy the irreconcilable. With those who are ready to talk, you need to talk.

          Most recently, the Egyptian security forces in the Sinai partly flooded and partly brought down - completely - the tunnels through which the terrorists in Gaza were supplied. None of the deceased survived. An example, perhaps, and not very successful - Israel, for example, under the watchful eye of "international public opinion could not go" - but this is an example of effective action.
    3. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 1 December 2015 07: 09
      +3
      Quote: avvg
      In my opinion, Negotiations with terrorists are unacceptable, they must be destroyed, wherever they try to raise their heads.


      Only a warrior has the right to hold a machine gun in his hand. All other terrorists. The special forces will dig, and he will be right.
      1. Yu-81
        Yu-81 1 December 2015 07: 35
        11
        Yes, this is nonsense !!! What the fuck is a truce?!?! With whom??? With these geeks ??? Give them leave ?! But you don’t need to give things warm on the road? !!! ??

        WET !!!! no truce !!! Wet where they stand !!! Whoever wants to can give up !! And to destroy all the rest mercilessly!

        UN - puppet sharashka, doll mattresses.
        1. Erg
          Erg 1 December 2015 08: 09
          +4
          Perfectly in the hole. Another divorce in order to lick the wounds. The UN plays on the side of the terrorists, licking the ass to the Americans.
        2. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 1 December 2015 10: 42
          +2
          Quote: yu-xnumx
          WET !!!! no truce !!! Wet where they stand !!! Whoever wants to can give up !! And to destroy all the rest mercilessly!

          All true.
          It is necessary to act within the framework of mattress tactics - to promise, agree, nod your head and continue your business, i.e. to wet, wet, wet the bearded, wherever they dig.
    4. hydrox
      hydrox 1 December 2015 08: 44
      +5
      Quote: avvg
      Negotiations with terrorists is unacceptable


      We sailed, we know, in Ukraine it happened twice: a truce, regrouping, replenishment - and again into battle, and in humanitarian aid, as is usual in Turkey - ammunition!
  2. Name
    Name 1 December 2015 06: 40
    +6
    Allow me this way EKHIDNINKO: if the UN sticks its nose in OO, expect from the State Department "concern" with recommendations ...
  3. Baloo
    Baloo 1 December 2015 06: 42
    13
    This is mistake. The UN has given terrorists time to regroup and replenish ammunition. War is not a sporting event. The enemy must be destroyed, that’s the whole philosophy. angry
    1. Armax
      Armax 1 December 2015 07: 11
      +6
      Quote: Balu
      The UN has given terrorists time to regroup and replenish ammunition.

      Namely, for a voluntary exit two months and "humanitarian aid" are not needed.
      They wanted to go out, a day at the training camp, got up and went.
      1. APS
        APS 1 December 2015 11: 05
        +1
        Absolutely true and no cease-fires, otherwise regrouping and even harder fights ...
      2. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 1 December 2015 11: 16
        +2
        They wanted to go out, a day at the training camp, got up and went.
        What day ?! 10 minutes and exit. Weapons and ammunition must not be carried ... The number of items is limited to 10 kg.
        For a day they mined there for half a city
    2. novobranets
      novobranets 1 December 2015 07: 11
      12
      Americans do not diversify tactics. The SAR army is advancing, the thugs are suffering losses and lacking ammunition and time to regroup. Then a kind UN appears and says, "Wait, I’ll settle everything, I’ll agree, you just wait a couple of months," as a result, "well, I didn’t, I didn’t." We saw such a picture in the Donbass, the republics of the people succumbed to the trick of an armistice, halted the offensive, and the junta used this time to pull up reserves, and everything started all over again. As long as the UN is an instrument of the AMs, you shouldn't trust it, I think so.
      And what do they mean by the word "humanitarian aid" is worth being careful.
    3. Tanker55
      Tanker55 1 December 2015 07: 13
      +1
      True, the blow must be quick and unexpected, bang-bang and 200!
  4. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 1 December 2015 06: 42
    +8
    It turns out that the UN special mission "persuaded" the militants to leave one of the districts of the city, namely al-Waer, and move to other provinces of Syria - to begin with, Idlib
    and then what? will provide a "corridor" to enter Libya? this is "the fight against terrorism? this? then take them straight to Brussels!"
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 1 December 2015 08: 51
      0
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      then take them immediately to Brussels!

      Valuable suggestion!
      And accommodate in the best hotels with payment of travel allowance and with ladies on call (Merkel with Federica)
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 1 December 2015 10: 41
      0
      No, they are kind of connecting with their broads from Jude al-Islam, Arkhar and Nusra to fight in northern Hama.

      That is, the UN saved up to 1000 the surrounded broads and takes them out so that they get weapons and take part in the battles for Morek and in the northern suburbs of Hama against Assad.
  5. Amurets
    Amurets 1 December 2015 06: 45
    +8
    Earlier this practice has already taken place. In 2013, the UN missionaries also “persuaded” some militants to leave some localities in Homs province, however, first, not all militants agreed, and second, it was strange that after the truce, militants of one terrorist organization were simply replaced by militants other. The provinces of “Dzhebhat an-Nusra” have strengthened.
    It’s not a truce! It’s a trap for relocation, rest and reorganization of forces. Either the militants must surrender completely or they must be completely destroyed. There is definitely no civilian population as such.
    1. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 1 December 2015 07: 58
      0
      In two months you can lick the wounds, and replenish the BC, and receive instructions and study the use of unfamiliar weapons ...
      Only guards in clay, only there!
  6. Denis DV
    Denis DV 1 December 2015 06: 46
    +2
    The State Department is encrypted under the UN, ISIS CIA officers are preparing a fortified area.
  7. VD chauvinist
    VD chauvinist 1 December 2015 06: 50
    0
    Simplicity is worse than theft. Or is this simplicity imaginary? In any case, idealism, coupled with good intentions, seriously harm those who REALLY bear the brunt of the problem.
  8. Wolka
    Wolka 1 December 2015 06: 52
    +1
    oh, this UN, even if it didn’t interfere and didn’t get under my feet, I think the military will understand why ...
  9. brasist
    brasist 1 December 2015 06: 53
    +2
    It turns out that the UN special mission "persuaded" the militants to leave one of the districts of the city, namely al-Waer, and move to other provinces of Syria - to begin with, Idlib

    Apparently (a coalition from 65 countries) is saving its fosterlings for further actions, which was to be expected. request
    1. fif21
      fif21 1 December 2015 07: 00
      +3
      Quote: brasist
      It turns out that the UN special mission "persuaded" the militants to leave one of the districts of the city, namely al-Waer, and move to other provinces of Syria - to begin with, Idlib
      I hope the Syrian army will "persuade" the militants forever. Do not let the thugs out alive or give them a "corridor" through the minefields.
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 1 December 2015 07: 11
        +2
        Or let our VKS know which road they will take.
        1. Black Colonel
          Black Colonel 1 December 2015 07: 59
          +1
          I just wanted to voice this idea. good +
          1. avva2012
            avva2012 1 December 2015 08: 34
            0
            Symmetrically. good +
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. avva2012
    avva2012 1 December 2015 06: 55
    +4
    On the air of the TV channel there was a material informing that the Syrian government army should “wait” for at least two months - until the militants left the city.
    And what is there to display for two months? Ammunition, looted goods? Apparently so. The spirits themselves, get together, just gird themselves. They sat on their jihad mobil and that's it. The article does not say what the armed forces of the ATS think about this? UN, now negotiates only with Babai?
  11. V.ic
    V.ic 1 December 2015 06: 56
    +7
    Who would have "asked" Hitler to clear Vienna and Budapest, and Stalin to "slow down" a little with the attack on Berlin? The ears of the USA State Department are visible.
    1. Gani
      Gani 1 December 2015 07: 41
      +2
      Well, Hitler waited patiently while the French army was evacuated from the coast
      1. V.ic
        V.ic 1 December 2015 08: 04
        +1
        Quote: Gani
        Hitler waited patiently while french army evacuated from the coast

        If you mean Hitler's "stop order" at Dunkirk, then there were evacuated the English.
        1. Gani
          Gani 1 December 2015 09: 21
          0
          Thank you, you're right - I had to read, update the memory)), but about 100 thousand. the French military was nevertheless taken out.
  12. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 1 December 2015 07: 13
    +5
    Wise-wise decision. 1 day to exit, for that matter. and even better, bring the civilian population, and then roll up this area with CABs. Behind this decision, donkey striped ears are clearly visible. But the United States in Vietnam did not make any differences. They rolled everyone and everything.
  13. bashkort
    bashkort 1 December 2015 07: 26
    +2
    Some strange wars went on, reminiscent of dances with tambourines of the XVII-XIX centuries, when the armies "gallantly" let each other into convenient positions, agreed on the place of the battle, etc. True, the peaceful peizans got it all the same, they robbed everything.
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 December 2015 07: 26
    +3
    must "wait" at least two months

    So the UN has joined the active assistance to terrorists. How such "truce" ends Russia is very well aware of both the Chechen company and Ukraine. Where is the world heading if the UN is already openly protecting the bandits?
  15. UNAUTHORIZED
    UNAUTHORIZED 1 December 2015 07: 43
    +1
    All are engaged in imitation of violent activities for the good of the world. Then they will declare: “Only the bombing of Russia did not allow the truce to be achieved.
  16. PatriotKZ
    PatriotKZ 1 December 2015 07: 58
    +1
    Push them to the end
  17. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 1 December 2015 08: 00
    0
    All proposals of the West, including the UN, must be considered in terms of distrust. Also, what kind of evacuation of militants is ...
  18. Bekas1967
    Bekas1967 1 December 2015 08: 05
    0
    Where was the UN when they captured the city and killed the inhabitants ??? I hope that there is enough will and determination to bring to the end what has been started, not to let go of the city with impunity, only complete surrender.
  19. Bakht
    Bakht 1 December 2015 08: 07
    0
    The Minsk version is only in the Middle East. The regrouping of militant forces with a guarantee that they will not be hit by the air forces. How ... the UN guaranteed. When hit by an aircraft, a howl about bad Russia will immediately rise.

    Well, as correctly noted here. Is the UN in talks with terrorists? Bravo ... Churkin will have enough work for five years.
  20. TTX
    TTX 1 December 2015 08: 11
    0
    I believe there was a rotation, they brought the tired and wounded out, strengthen their positions and deliver weapons, b / p, medicines, a humanitarian convoy and a new one to the battle.
  21. Stinger
    Stinger 1 December 2015 08: 30
    0
    Touching concern, four years later. Why's that? And why not send them to the EU. For treatment. Tired of cutting off heads.
  22. gukoyan
    gukoyan 1 December 2015 08: 34
    0
    Negotiations with terrorists are possible only with the help of their methods, namely, only destruction!
  23. Alexey Lesogor
    Alexey Lesogor 1 December 2015 08: 50
    0
    It is beneficial for someone to bring the conflict into a sluggish phase.
  24. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 1 December 2015 09: 28
    +2
    "Special commission" you say ... And where did it come from? Who authorized her for this ...? This would not have openly slipped past V. Churkin in the UN. So, again, in private, behind our back, right?
  25. lazma3
    lazma3 1 December 2015 09: 41
    0
    What negotiations can be with terrorists. Maybe they also have to thank for the dead, for the destroyed cities. Only their complete destruction.
  26. imugn
    imugn 1 December 2015 10: 07
    0
    UN saves terrorists
  27. newcomer
    newcomer 1 December 2015 11: 18
    +4
    I wonder what kind of direction it is? Is it like saving civilians or daish?
  28. Prutkov
    Prutkov 1 December 2015 12: 39
    0
    Let them go, but without weapons.
  29. bumerang.
    bumerang. 1 December 2015 15: 24
    0
    al-Waer, and move to other provinces of Syria - to start in Idlib. We are talking about about three thousand representatives of various terrorist groups.

    Well, yes, to the border with Turkey, how it ends is understandable, the war will continue indefinitely and this territory will be given to Turkey. But whether the bandits leave Homs, I doubt very much, and there will be even more victims. Russia is in the way, then Turkey, then the UN.
  30. Viktor.N.Aleksandrov.
    Viktor.N.Aleksandrov. 1 December 2015 19: 00
    +1
    Well, are you all so intractable? The UN must be obeyed. Provide a truce to the brave soldiers of Islam laughing ... And even (as a gesture of goodwill) to disinfect this area from parasites ... by the sun! They say they are effective against all kinds of pests in enclosed spaces (tunnels, pillboxes, caves, etc.)