Military Review
Sign in Sign up

Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space

95
The Russian ambassador to London, Alexander Yakovenko, expressed bewilderment over the actions of the British Defense Ministry, which sent fighters to escort Russian strategic bombers flying close to the air borders of the Kingdom, reports TASS.




“I wonder why the Ministry of Defense sees problems in the routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace, which pose no threat,”
wrote Yakovenko on his Twitter.

The British Defense Ministry reported that the 19 of November sent "Eurofighter Typhoon fighters to escort Russian strategic bombers Tu-160 flying in the area of ​​British interest in international airspace over the Atlantic."

It is noted that the fighters "remained close to the Russian aircraft until they left this zone."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Google News
95 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 23 November 2015 16: 43
    66
    they podshestёrili, protected us at their own expense over the Atlantic laughing
    British pilots will do anything for selfies with Russian planes.
    1. herruvim
      herruvim 23 November 2015 16: 48
      28
      Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space


      The problem of wet pants has not yet been canceled
      1. Reserve officer
        Reserve officer 23 November 2015 16: 55
        29
        "It is noted that the fighters" remained close to the Russian planes until they left this zone. "

        Did they protect their terrorists from us? Those who were given citizenship and residence permits ... Very similar.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. vorobey
          vorobey 23 November 2015 17: 28
          27
          Quote: Reserve officer
          Did they protect their terrorists from us? Those who were given citizenship and residence permits ... Very similar.


          not ... the guys accompanied those strategists who went to Syria ... and really went with weapons on board ... what can you do ... if we close the airspace everywhere ... an isolated country has to circle all over Europe. ..that then let them piss together ... only I didn’t understand the shaves were the most afraid of them?
          1. demo
            demo 23 November 2015 17: 36
            13
            Those. do you mean that the Norwegians, Swedes, French, Spaniards, Italians and even the Portuguese have scored a "bolt", and the Saxons are most itching to do?
            1. vorobey
              vorobey 23 November 2015 18: 17
              15
              Quote: demo
              Those. do you mean that the Norwegians, Swedes, French, Spaniards, Italians and even the Portuguese have scored a "bolt", and the Saxons are most itching to do?


              Well, something like this ... the Saxons and the zone of interest is wider ... if it weren’t for Russia, then the United States would be a colony of Britons now. laughing
              1. Marconi41
                Marconi41 24 November 2015 00: 50
                +1
                Quote: vorobey
                Well, something like this ... the Saxons and the zone of interest is wider ... if it weren’t for Russia, then the United States would be a colony of Britons now.

                And who will like the passage of strategists along your borders with full ammunition and cover? Or do you think the kingdom does not know how far the X-55, X-555 or X-101 are flying? So they are worried correctly. Yes, and ours made such a hook intentionally. After all, they returned back in a completely different way.
                1. Mahmut
                  Mahmut 24 November 2015 05: 38
                  +3
                  I’m wondering why the Ministry of Defense sees problems in the routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace that pose no threat. ”

                  Routine flights cause routine maintenance. It seems that Yakovenko himself pushes psychosis among couch patriots. Great Britain behaved within the framework of laws and did not express any notes of concern.
            2. Iline
              Iline 23 November 2015 18: 21
              +9
              I wonder why the Ministry of Defense sees problems in the routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace that pose no threat

              Varangians, just accompanied. They can’t pass by any of our aircraft when it goes around the corner. True, they screwed up once - a couple of our strategists were sent to intercept a pair of our strategists. And when the second, then the third, and then the tanker appeared behind the first pair, it was necessary to see the convulsive movements of the Norwegians.
              The Anglo-Saxons at one time were very worried about the fact that our strategists began to fly too often and had to climb to escort. Because of this, the resource of aircraft engines is greatly consumed. laughing
              But seriously, I can imagine articles in the Western press like - "our fearless pilots carried out intercept the enemy at the doorstep of our house. Exactly so, not escort, but interception. This is why psychosis is being pumped up (this is why it has recently been decided in the west to run with the whole herd to psychologists).
              Our planes also escort NATO military aircraft near our borders, but this is not a sensation.
              1. gladcu2
                gladcu2 23 November 2015 20: 28
                +2
                lline

                This is not psychosis, it is an increase in one's own significance.
          2. Persistent
            Persistent 23 November 2015 18: 32
            28
            The opinion of the navigators ...

            Flying around the corner with combat use. As a navigator, I can imagine how much gray hair one such flight adds.

            "There are from two to five sorties every day, the total time spent by strategic missile carriers in the air has exceeded 200 hours. missiles from the Mediterranean Sea at terrorist targets. The flight route passed over the Barents, Norwegian Seas, and the Strait of Gibraltar, "Lieutenant Colonel T. Kapsha said.

            The flight route before striking is impressive. Having flown out from Murmansk, flying close to Finland, Norway, Great Britain, France, Spain, the Tu-160s link in the Gibraltar area made refueling. Only aces can do this. The coherence and accuracy of this operation is impressive, as well as staff training, too, because the flight also had to be coordinated with the leadership of these countries.

            "The total flight duration was 16 hours 20 minutes."

            Having dealt a blow, our strategic bombers returned to their places of basing, but in a different way - flying over Iraq and Iran, making one more refueling over the Caspian. The total flight length was almost 13 thousand km.
            Please note Long-range Aviation made flights around the corner, went around the whole of Europe + two refueling, one of which is night .........
            1. Peaceful Basmach
              Peaceful Basmach 23 November 2015 21: 52
              +3
              Stunned !!! I wanted it differently, but the feeling of pride for aviation goes off scale
          3. NordUral
            NordUral 23 November 2015 20: 12
            +2
            Judging by the route of ours, you can clearly see all the "cooperation" of the West in the fight against ISIS.
          4. Manul
            Manul 24 November 2015 00: 43
            +1
            Quote: vorobey
            Well, what can you do ... if we close the airspace everywhere ... an isolated country has to circle all over Europe ...

            Because of the fucking one of Turkey. Maybe it's time to remember about the views of Constantinople ..?
      2. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 23 November 2015 16: 56
        22
        Higher and higher and higher
        We strive for the flight of our "birds".
        Great Britain - be quiet!
        We will not touch your borders! laughing
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur 23 November 2015 16: 59
          +8
          Touch, touch! If you touch Che so much that it won’t seem enough!
          There, in Syria, our white swans have shown how to "caress" we can! soldier
        2. RUS96
          RUS96 23 November 2015 21: 04
          0
          Higher and higher and higher
          We strive for the flight of our "birds".
          UK - Bottom!
          We will not touch your borders! laughing
      3. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 23 November 2015 16: 58
        +2
        Quote: herruvim
        The problem of wet pants ...

        - What does the pants have to do with it? - Well, the West has not got used to our military aircraft proudly hovering about their business!
        1. Throw
          Throw 23 November 2015 17: 06
          +5
          we will not touch your borders

          While we are touching on the "zone of interest" in the international airspace.
          For nefig there to denote their zones ..wink
        2. vorobey
          vorobey 23 November 2015 17: 30
          +6
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          Well, the West is not used to our proudly soaring combat aircraft!


          and submarines ... I heard again what it seemed to them ..
        3. dsi
          dsi 23 November 2015 17: 34
          31
          However, autumn ...
          1. The black
            The black 23 November 2015 21: 13
            +3
            Well, yes, rooks without borders.
      4. 79807420129
        79807420129 23 November 2015 17: 03
        +9
        Quote: herruvim
        Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space


        The problem of wet pants has not yet been canceled

        Yes, and wet pants and looked at how Swans work in real life, as they say, the award found its heroes.
      5. ava09
        ava09 23 November 2015 21: 58
        +1
        Quote: herruvim
        Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space

        Yakovenko understands that London sees in the span of our Tu-160s not problems, but an occasion to raise the degree of the international situation, which is already heating up with the West. They will remain silent about this only when none of our military aircraft will fly at all.
        Quote: herruvim
        The problem of wet pants has not yet been canceled

        Anglo-Saxons can have wet pants if they wait for a hit from these Tu-160s. I can suspect them of anything, but not of mass idiocy ...
    2. Lenin
      Lenin 23 November 2015 17: 01
      +3
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      they podshestёrili, protected us at their own expense over the Atlantic laughing
      British pilots will do anything for selfies with Russian planes.


      These are guys from envy. Yet in childhood they dream of growing up and becoming big. laughing The fighter has a dream to become like a white swan ... tra ta-ta
    3. Tor5
      Tor5 23 November 2015 17: 24
      +3
      What nonsense! Who defined this "zone of British interest"?
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Nick
      Nick 23 November 2015 17: 46
      +2
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      they podshestёrili, protected us at their own expense over the Atlantic laughing
      British pilots will do anything for selfies with Russian planes.

      Hmm An original look at the situation ... winked hi
    6. Persistent
      Persistent 23 November 2015 18: 21
      +9
      British pilots will do anything for selfies with Russian planes.

      In the subject laughing

      The presidents of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia declared to the whole world that: "The Baltic countries refuse to participate in the coalition against ISIS as long as Russia is there."
      Representatives of Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino and Andorra nodded in understanding and said that they also did not have a single serviceable combat aircraft left ...
      1. Sergey-8848
        Sergey-8848 23 November 2015 20: 45
        +2
        The representative of the Vatican even earlier than all of them said that everything is God's Will.
        1. AUL
          AUL 23 November 2015 21: 54
          0
          I don’t understand why these gentlemen became alarmed? Are you afraid that they will be fried on them? So for this, the Carcasses would not have to approach their shores - and would perfectly reach from their territory. It’s just that, apparently, the reflex of the pick-up mongrel worked - to bark at the one who passes by.
      2. Peaceful Basmach
        Peaceful Basmach 23 November 2015 21: 54
        0
        Who called them?
    7. Manul
      Manul 24 November 2015 00: 39
      0
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      British pilots will do anything for selfies with Russian planes.

      Because it has become fashionable to lie that you are a participant in the war for the Falkland Islands, age does not allow. smile . And everyone wants to be a hero.
  2. Motherland Russia
    Motherland Russia 23 November 2015 16: 44
    +5
    After all, it is necessary to create visibility, such as being watched.
    And write off money ...
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 23 November 2015 16: 47
      +9
      Problem one "Volcano" is dead, and the carcasses are flying. Here's how to explain this moment to citizens, taxpayers.
  3. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 23 November 2015 16: 46
    +9
    I don’t understand why this ambassador saw such a thing there? Absolutely normal practice, they didn’t seem to scream anything about this? what
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 23 November 2015 16: 52
      +4
      Quote: Vladimirets
      they didn’t seem to scream anything about this?

      But why?
      There was a standard press statement - and silence.
      I don’t understand what Yakovenko squeals, attention draws to this routine, or what? Or should he, on the contrary, poke their nose, that many planes flew in one direction, and only one or two returned?
    2. mark2
      mark2 23 November 2015 17: 01
      +8
      Yes, these are all political games. England keeps talking about her problems with our carcasses, we, making a sympathetic mine, tell them that there are no problems and that it was not worth it so worried. And they and ours understand that problems exist and that these problems do not exist with us.
      NATO has lived so long without serious "dangers" that it has forgotten how to adequately respond to minor "threats." and now for them the flight of the Tu-160 causes wild delight of the pygmies for them that they personally greet him. How! The gods of war are flying by. And after the Russian VKS staged a show with the use of strategists, it turns out that the Gods of War are real and know how to punish. and the Britts themselves have nothing. Even his own search fleet to hunt for Russian submarines. help from Canada.
    3. veksha50
      veksha50 23 November 2015 17: 07
      13
      Quote: Vladimirets
      Absolutely normal practice



      If their strategist or the Yankees flew in international space, but close to our borders, ours would also have raised fighters ... And training, and so, just in case ...

      So, ordinary everyday life, even unworthy of attention ...

      PS The Baltic states behave much worse ... Accompanying our planes and ships on their own is nothing, so they scream to the whole world ... It is as if the Baltic Sea and the airspace above it are their property ...
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 23 November 2015 17: 13
        +2
        Quote: veksha50
        If their strategist or the Yankees flew in international space, but close to our borders, ours would also have raised fighters ... And training, and so, just in case ...

        So, ordinary everyday life, even unworthy of attention ...

        And I about it.
      2. Bayonet
        Bayonet 23 November 2015 18: 26
        +2
        Quote: veksha50
        If their strategist or the Yankees flew in international space, but close to our borders, ours would also have lifted fighters ...

        Moreover, a well-loaded strategist! wink
      3. kil 31
        kil 31 23 November 2015 19: 01
        +3
        [quote = veksha50] [quote = Vladimir] Absolutely normal practice, [/ quote]


        If their or Yankees strategist flew
        George, why are you so. Suddenly, someone from England is reading us, and you are on a sick mazol. They, too, like ordinary people worry that they already have 30 no strategist. laughing
  4. podpolkovnik
    podpolkovnik 23 November 2015 16: 46
    +4
    Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space

    But I understand:
    what problems did London see in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space ...

    They did not have time to properly prepare!
  5. Lone wolf
    Lone wolf 23 November 2015 16: 47
    +2
    Fear has big eyes .... and .. on the thief and the hat is on ,,,, convinced of the power of the Russian Federation .... well, how do strategists pour their contents onto the dirty Albion ... bench press, bench press ... one place
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 23 November 2015 16: 54
      +1
      And why should Russia bite its hands on some kind of cousin Albion?
      1. berkut9737
        berkut9737 24 November 2015 00: 06
        0
        And why should Russia bite its hands on some kind of cousin Albion?

        There is why.
  6. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 23 November 2015 16: 47
    +2
    Apparently they didn’t like the figure of a 1-finger hand that our pilot showed from the cockpit.
  7. Black Colonel
    Black Colonel 23 November 2015 16: 48
    +1
    They do not follow, but accompany, supposedly, we also participate in the operation against ISIS.
  8. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 23 November 2015 16: 49
    +2
    Quote: McLooka-MacLeod
    Apparently they didn’t like the figure of a 1-finger hand that our pilot showed from the cockpit.

    it wasn’t a finger, or rather not a finger.(c) British pilot.
  9. IAlex
    IAlex 23 November 2015 16: 49
    +1
    In these greedy Angles, they were not even escorted to the base in Syria, because the whole world is a "zone of interest of Great Britain in international airspace"
  10. 787nkx
    787nkx 23 November 2015 16: 50
    +8
    Simple practice.
    We also respond to approaching goals.
    And here is the strategic board, it is not clear what is charged.
    If a similar device approached us,
    then they would accompany with everything possible, Wh.
    1. aba
      aba 23 November 2015 17: 57
      0
      We also respond to approaching goals.

      Oh yeah! I did not forget how the Americans were indignant in Syria, when ours flew up to see who it was under the wing confused! laughing
  11. SAM 5
    SAM 5 23 November 2015 16: 51
    +3
    in the UK area of ​​interest in international airspace

    So this is our area of ​​interest. stop
  12. Victor-M
    Victor-M 23 November 2015 16: 51
    +1
    The British military said it sent “Eurofighter Typhoon fighters on November 19 to escort Russian strategic Tu-160 bombers flying in the UK’s zone of interest in international airspace over the Atlantic. It is noted that fighters “stayed close to Russian planes until they left this zone»

    Now the NATO partners are calm, and the foggy Albion pilots even more so. Upon arrival at the base exhaled and shook out. laughing
  13. mark2
    mark2 23 November 2015 16: 52
    +1
    Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space


    They also do not understand what problems they have. But the fact that they have problems is certain.
  14. bronik
    bronik 23 November 2015 16: 52
    +1
    Possessed and probably it became easier. Well this is not to fight with the IG.
  15. Altona
    Altona 23 November 2015 16: 54
    +1
    The Western community, represented by the Anglo-Saxons, was simply accustomed to feeling like masters in this world and it became unusual for him to demonstrate Russian military power in the world’s sky ... In general, the usual fucking-up syndrome ...
  16. AlexTires
    AlexTires 23 November 2015 16: 55
    +1
    Do not burn kerosene in vain like this - there will be no Hiroshim in Britain for you! Raving shave, fact. laughing
    1. Poppy
      Poppy 23 November 2015 16: 59
      +2
      let the resource be killed, it is much less among fighters than strategists
  17. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 23 November 2015 16: 55
    +1
    If you do not go into details, then this was done just to soar the brains and see what's under the wings of our aircraft. Suddenly they will see, and take pictures, maybe they don’t know that everything is inside. We can just not pay attention and point out so as not to get underfoot.
  18. Pamir48
    Pamir48 23 November 2015 16: 56
    +2
    Quote: McLooka-MacLeod
    Apparently they didn’t like the figure of a 1-finger hand that our pilot showed from the cockpit.

    fellow he showed to the elbow
  19. LVMI1980
    LVMI1980 23 November 2015 16: 58
    0
    Trained, and a couple of days later with a combat load flew soldier
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. russmensch
    russmensch 23 November 2015 17: 00
    +2
    ... why the defense ministry sees problems in the routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace,

    That's because pleased, so pleased. Flights of our bombers are called routine ... And when one flight was a whole event. So we become strong again ... hi
  22. bad
    bad 23 November 2015 17: 00
    -1
    “I wonder why the Ministry of Defense sees problems in the routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace that pose no threat”
    ... heh .. their underpants wash rubble again .. and diapers cost money .. laughing
  23. parafoiler
    parafoiler 23 November 2015 17: 04
    -1
    It's uncomfortable to spoil bricks ?! That's it!
  24. 1536
    1536 23 November 2015 17: 05
    +2
    Our ambassadors, like red girls, do not understand anything. Is it not clear that the world is steadily pushing us to understand that Russia is an aggressor that needs to be closed, sealed within its borders, blaming all the terrorist attacks, all the wars of recent years, Ukraine, Crimea, Fukushima, Charlie for the fires in California? And what did this intelligible ambassador tell the British to shut up? Nothing?! Perplexed ours ... As if everyone froze and are waiting for the post-Putin stage. And someone rushes him. God grant that I was wrong.
  25. Terrible_L.
    Terrible_L. 23 November 2015 17: 15
    +1
    Quote: 787nkx
    Simple practice.
    We also respond to approaching goals.
    And here is the strategic board, it is not clear what is charged.
    If a similar device approached us,
    then they would accompany with everything possible, Wh.

    Absolutely agree. Here is part of our guilt in the fact that the Anglo-Saxons have lost the habit of such flights.

    “I wonder why the defense ministry sees problems in routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace that poses no threat ”

    Here, as I see it, there is a slight irony in the words of our ambassador. Flights are certainly not routine, a few years ago they were generally rare, but I hope that they will now be carried out on a regular basis. The Russian flag should be presented in the sky as well.
  26. urik62
    urik62 23 November 2015 17: 16
    +2
    “I wonder why the Ministry of Defense sees problems in the routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace, which pose no threat,”

    What is this strategist who is not a threat? There is a threat. He wrote nonsense on Twitter.
  27. DPN
    DPN 23 November 2015 17: 16
    +1
    It’s just that Russia is becoming stronger than England, that’s all the problems.
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 23 November 2015 17: 32
      +1
      Quote: DPN
      It’s just that Russia is becoming stronger than England, that’s all the problems.

      belay Was she once weaker than Naglia?
  28. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 23 November 2015 17: 16
    +2
    “I wonder why the Ministry of Defense sees problems in the routine flights of Russian bombers in international airspace that pose no threat”

    I wonder what and how Yakovlenka was taught at MGIMO if he does not understand why the air forces of one country react so much to the appearance of attack aircraft of another country near their borders. Do not understand - keep quiet in a rag, or ask those who understand. Why put your not knowledge of elementary things to ridicule, that's what is not clear.
  29. AIR-ZNAK
    AIR-ZNAK 23 November 2015 17: 21
    +1
    The return of swans to the Atlantic was when a link flew to Venezuela. Development is also taking into account the meteorological situation in the Atlantic. Crew training. Making recommendations on flights in this region
  30. shinobi
    shinobi 23 November 2015 17: 24
    +2
    Most likely, the diplomat’s words were misinterpreted as usual. Perplexing reaction of the British media to an ordinary event causes perplexity. Well flew by. They escorted, there is no reason for hysteria.
  31. The black
    The black 23 November 2015 17: 26
    +3
    It's just that the British government needed to make a fuss out of a generally ordinary event. It is a common world practice when interceptors are raised to accompany an approaching aircraft (at least as a training). Once upon a time "strategists" were based here, so I often heard from them stories of how they flew along the American borders, accompanied by their fighters. They did this so often that the faces of the American pilots were practically native laughing
  32. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 23 November 2015 17: 35
    0
    Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the flight of Russian Tu-160s in the international space.
    And they have the same problems all around.
  33. individual
    individual 23 November 2015 17: 37
    +1
    This we do not see a problem.
    Their plans are revealed and frustrated.
    The West pushed, paved the way for Hitler to war with Soviet Russia.
    Today, ISIS acts as the new Nazis ...
  34. Terrible_L.
    Terrible_L. 23 November 2015 17: 41
    +2
    Quote: 1536
    Our ambassadors, like red girls, do not understand anything. Is it not clear that the world is steadily pushing us to understand that Russia is an aggressor that needs to be closed, sealed within its borders, blaming all the terrorist attacks, all the wars of recent years, Ukraine, Crimea, Fukushima, Charlie for the fires in California? And what did this intelligible ambassador tell the British to shut up? Nothing?! Perplexed by our ...

    And do you know many ambassadors to reason like this? The ambassador is not a politician behind the podium, he cannot wave his hands and yell about everything he thinks about. There are certain norms of behavior in the diplomatic environment, and the ambassador can not always express what he wants.
    My minus.
  35. chifir
    chifir 23 November 2015 17: 42
    -1
    ... if there are no problems, they must be created by sending escort fighters ...
  36. EDDI 76
    EDDI 76 23 November 2015 17: 48
    0
    just afraid of RUSSIA and all, the problem is
    will soon reckon with our world order
  37. Alexey Boukin
    Alexey Boukin 23 November 2015 17: 53
    +1
    [quote = Top5] What nonsense! Who defined this "zone of British interest"?

    So after all, we can not enter the "zone of interests of Great Britain in the international airspace over the Atlantic." The Caspian Sea is proof of this ...
  38. Shuttle
    Shuttle 23 November 2015 17: 55
    +4
    Correctly the British did. If they had done it wrong, then we would have poured one hundredth, or even two.
  39. michell
    michell 23 November 2015 18: 07
    +2
    Russian Ambassador to London Alexander Yakovenko expressed bewilderment over the actions of the British Ministry of Defense, which sent fighters to escort Russian strategic bombers flying near the air borders of the Kingdom


    Alexander Yakovenko is a top troll - should he not know that on EVERY flight our bombers are accompanied by the interceptors of EVERY NATO country, which the plane passes by. An absolutely ordinary situation - ours fly to work out tasks, NATO members meet and accompany them - each in his own area of ​​responsibility. In my opinion - trolling of the highest level - "Cho boiled over, guys? It's all exactly - well, our guys flew a little, it's not very scary" wink
  40. KCA
    KCA 23 November 2015 18: 35
    +1
    Although, in principle, their concern can be understood, flying past Swans with X-102 loaded into the drums, so by chance they might not have anything left from the island at all, even the Queen will not be able to take out
  41. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 23 November 2015 18: 36
    +1
    It became scary !!! so this is the normal behavior of scoundrels, first to shit. and then wait and see retribution in all actions of the opposite side, then a submarine was added, whether it is true or not and whose big question is, but the "fool" in the media is abandoned so that it may turn out to be Mongolian.
  42. tinibar
    tinibar 23 November 2015 18: 44
    +1
    Quote: herruvim
    Yakovenko: I do not understand what problems London saw in the span of Russian Tu-160 in the international space


    The problem of wet pants has not yet been canceled

    You can joke on this topic for a long time - it's nice! Our people finally made us feel proud of our country again! In general, what's so surprising? Normal normal reaction. If foreign bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons were flying near the "zone of our interests", and ours would not react in any way, I would, to put it mildly, be at a loss ...
  43. Wild_grey_wolf
    Wild_grey_wolf 23 November 2015 18: 53
    +2
    The superchargers of the difficult situation in their European countries, they scare their own people. Preparing the next weaning of tax money, naspil.
  44. Santjaga_Garka
    Santjaga_Garka 23 November 2015 19: 00
    +1
    Why be perplexed? Just scary ...
  45. Kibl
    Kibl 23 November 2015 19: 04
    0
    Yes, just a big-eared macaque said FAS and a proud British lion, raising its paws, a tail under the butt and rushed after the "white swans" !!!
  46. mamont5
    mamont5 23 November 2015 19: 06
    +1
    The whole "West" has one problem - the Russophobia of the brain. Treatment is only operative, because these types do not listen to words.
  47. slava5553
    slava5553 23 November 2015 19: 19
    +3
    Well, you can understand them in principle: secondly, the hummingbird is such an unpleasant thing that from the Baltic the range of a sea-based product covers the distance to all capitals of Europe, including London, and the TU-160 is capable of lifting them aboard up to 12 tons , only airborne, they are lighter, and the power of the explosive is the same. In addition, the Kolibr can carry a special warhead, and since they fly with super sound and at very low altitudes, it is a very big problem to spot and even more so to shoot them down. But firstly, in Syria, our Aerospace Forces are bombing the ISIS infrastructure, and forgive the investment, and it seems to me whoever squeals more from our western and overseas "friends" about the destruction of bandit formations is their main sponsor
  48. Terner38
    Terner38 23 November 2015 19: 40
    +1
    And how new they are! Do not mind working for the homeland for the sake of another couple of three dozen swans ..
  49. NeRTT
    NeRTT 23 November 2015 20: 32
    0
    Our Air Force fighter interceptors are also always undermined due to NATO reconnaissance aircraft flying in international airspace (often closer to our borders !!)
    So all the way, do not piss Brita !!
    God forbid, and the head will not shave ..
    Eyes will not fall out of orbits and ..
    Although these topics have long been beaten ..
    Well, for God's sake, Damn .. DO NOT SALT !!! soldier
  50. cap
    cap 23 November 2015 20: 38
    +3
    From the archive YES.
    "the story of a veteran ...
    ... after returning from the military patrol of TU-16, which took place in neutral waters over the Pacific Ocean, a strange close-up shot of the cockpit of a US fighter with a pilot who presses a sheet of paper against the cockpit light was found on the developed film of the on-board camera.
    In the commander’s report, nothing was said about the aircraft’s dangerous approach.
    The navigator of TU 16 was called to where to explain.
    To the question of what it is, the answer followed
    -they always meet us when we go on a parallel course to the aircraft carrier (dsl was "Enterprise")
    - What is written on the sheet ...
    -"Hello Ivan"
    -And what is one shot?
    -He Comrade Colonel saw the camera took it for a gun barrel in the side and flew away .. "
    This is in the 70's.
    And now they are making an elephant out of a fly.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. nfoma80
      nfoma80 24 November 2015 00: 25
      0
      lately, scandals sucked from a finger, articles luring the yellow press, and hat-writing moods have become more frequent. Well, accompanied, well, all the same as usual, and we would have accompanied, what's the problem? and then millions of comments of the same type begin, which repeat the same thing for the hundredth time, it seems that people write the same comment to all articles. With rare exceptions, it makes no sense to read comments.