State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition

Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-ISIS coalition, provided that Moscow changes its views on the situation in Syria and stops supporting Assad, reports RIA News statement by State Department representative John Kirby.

“Each member of the coalition must have a unified position in relation to the ISIS. If we are talking about Russia, then we do not see that its actions are consistent with the goals of the coalition, that is, the destruction of ISIS, ”Kirby said.

“If you support Assad and provide him with assistance, this does not meet the main tasks of the coalition,” he said.

“If Russia is serious about persecuting ISIS and changes its approach to military operations in Syria, fine. We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition can be. But so far this has not happened,” says John Kirby.

Earlier, Moscow has repeatedly stated that the fate of Bashar al-Assad should not become the topic of international forums, since the future of the president is an internal affair of the country, and the Syrian people will determine it.

Comments

[vorobey]

well, to hell with the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retribution, they have unshakable determination .. it’s better not to interfere, even if they don’t climb under the arm ..

[cniza]

Quote: vorobey

well, to hell with the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retribution, they have unshakable determination .. it’s better not to interfere, even if they don’t climb under the arm ..

They launch a fool in a circle, and suddenly Russia will change its position ... do not measure by yourself and you will be happy.

[Temples]

“If Russia is serious about persecuting ISIS and changes its approach to military operations in Syria, fine. We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition can be. But so far this has not happened,” says John Kirby.

Russia is not targeted.
Russia just destroys your pets.
While Kibri will be discussing "contributions to the operation," I think our last terrorist will have time to bury in the ground.

[Nick]

Quote: Temples

While Kibri will be discussing "contributions to the operation," I think our last terrorist will have time to bury in the ground.

The Syrian army will dig in, and our task is to ensure the preparation of "raw materials" for it, so to speak

[vorobey]

Quote: Nick

and our task is to ensure the preparation of "raw materials" for it, so to speak

And here we only supply raw materials ...

[avg]

Mattress covers, as always, in the stupid "Psaki style" wishful thinking.

We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition can be.

They naively pretend that they do not understand that we will never enter a coalition under the auspices of the United States. And a proposal for cooperation is just a "suggestion for cooperation." And such proposals, as practice shows, are better understood by those who have already encountered the "true believers", and the mattress-makers, out of habit, still hope to sit out overseas.

[cniza]

Quote: avg

They naively pretend that they do not understand that we will never enter a coalition under the auspices of the United States. And a proposal for cooperation is just a "suggestion for cooperation."

They rush about from the fact that they don’t know where to run for what to grab on to, that’s what they’ve been boring. They understand everything perfectly, but they can’t change anything, as it used to be.

[SRC P-15]

We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition can be.

While you are preparing for the discussion, Russia is so invested in the operation against the IS that soon, the opinion of the coalition will not interest her!

[cniza]

Quote: SRC P-15

We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition can be.

While you are preparing for the discussion, Russia is so invested in the operation against the IS that soon, the opinion of the coalition will not interest her!

The moment has already come from which their opinion does not interest us, moreover, we are already pointing out their stupidity and miscalculations ... here they are besyatsa, that's it - the initiative has sailed away.

[Dr. Bormental]

Believe me, when everything is over, America will ascribe all the laurels to itself. They won't remember us. Obama will receive the 2nd Peace Prize. And they will tell us - you bombed civilians, here are more sanctions for you ...

[Fat]

something like that

[Fat]

and so the toad-eaters parasites

[Catafract]

do not smack nonsense, nonsense hurts, before victory in Syria, how can I walk to Mars. Assad is afraid to show even a couple of kilometers from the zone of residence of the Alawites that this "victorious offensive" of theirs has been going on for more than one year.
Why does the Russian Federation hold on to Iranian puppets against which 80% of the Syrian population?

[family tree]

Quote: Catafract

Why Russia is holding on to Iran's puppets against which 80% of the Syrian population?

Here, without checking, give out such numbers!
Otkeleva 80% then ? 150, no less! The old people said that it happened even 300, only, we don’t believe them very much, they’ll lie, they won’t take it expensive, and check the hell out what

[Prisoner]

Not only raw materials, as it turned out. But witty, do not say anything.

[Phantom Revolution]

Quote: Temples

While Kibri will be discussing "contributions to the operation," I think our last terrorist will have time to bury in the ground.

The main goal of the United States is to attribute all the merits in the fight against ISIS to the United States. So to speak, to leave as winners, and therefore they talk about their alleged successes in the fight against terrorists, but Russia only interferes with them.

When the ISIS are crushed, they will declare themselves (that's why they wanted Russia to be in the American coalition, and not vice versa) as winners and in all the media they will trumpet about them, and not about Russia. (an analogy about World War 2, in the end they got on the side of the winners and declared themselves the main assistant, and then slowly, at the expense of the media, almost the only one who fought against the Nazi coalition)

[family tree]

Quote: Phantom Revolution

and declared themselves the main assistant, and then slowly, at the expense of the media, almost the only one who fought against the Nazi coalition

Alexander Vasilyevich, like that, (legend, cho , for which he bought ...) during the alliance with the Austrians, he proposed to make a medal, on the obverse: God is with us and the servant, on the reverse, "yes, God is with them, the poor." Retelling, you’ll start kicking, I thought, don’t care. Remove these shoulder straps, but how the admirals of the Ukrainian fleet
"I, I'm floating, on a boat, to such a mother, from what, from what, there is no water in the fairway ... "

[79807420129]

Yes, you would go minke whales in the forest with your coalition to bomb excavators, there’s no time for us to set conditions, we need to work, striped hoopoes climb into the authorities, look, don’t be smeared hegemons, but we won’t hand over Assad.

[vovanpain]

Quote: 79807420129

Yes, you would go minke whales in the forest with your coalition to bomb excavators,

I fully support and agree.

[Reserve officer]

“If you support Assad and provide him with assistance, this does not meet the main tasks of the coalition”

Save the creator from such a coalition. We, by chance, were not confused with the vassals of the United States?
Russia destroys terrorists, but what this very coalition is doing is a big question.

[Dr. Bormental]

the main task of the coalition is to lie under the amers and wave.

[captain]

Mariupol should have been taken in 2014 (I express my opinion and do not try to reproach or teach anyone), this was a strategic mistake of our leadership. After the capture of Mariupol, Ukraine as a state, within its modern borders, would cease to exist. Sanctions simply would not be in sight. No one would remember about Crimea, there would be 3-5 states and the massacres in Donbas would come to an end. And ISIS would not undermine our plane.

[meriem1]

Quote: cniza

Quote: vorobey

well, to hell with the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retribution, they have unshakable determination .. it’s better not to interfere, even if they don’t climb under the arm ..

They launch a fool in a circle, and suddenly Russia will change its position ... do not measure by yourself and you will be happy.

Nothing new. The Balts still spoke. We will not be in a coalition against ISIS if Russia is in it!!! Where does the wind blow from .. everyone understands.

But We were upset (((One and a half non-soldiers with a flawed spirit will not help Us We are crying from such misfortune ....

[varov14]

At least they would introduce their protege, who needs to be supported, but don’t understand what. Idle talk.

[guzik007]

For some reason, these whores did not surprise me at all.

[sever.56]

http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/393/plwf283.png

You can't say better about the West and its politics than Bashar al-Assad...!!!
We need the coalition, not the coalition we need. Russia,
in a little over two months, destroyed the bandits at times
more than the notorious "coalition" for more than a year.
It is not for them to dictate how we should act in this struggle and
on what conditions to join the coalition. We will also consider:
- do we need it so that some NATO general
indicated who to bomb and who not, and where and at what time
fly out for operations ... !!!

[Vladimirets]

Quote: sever.56

Russia,
in a little over two months, destroyed the bandits at times
more than the notorious "coalition" for more than a year.

Let's be honest, it's easier for us, we have more bandits in Syria.

[Nevsky_ZU]

The West will be adamant. And here we are?
I don’t want to croak, but more and more often in the Russian media I begin to hear political scientists from the Syrian Free Republic. Interaction between the Aerospace Forces and the moderates has already been established. If the Russian authorities want and are ready to seize control from the Americans in the FSA and from the opposition to Assad, then they are honored and praised, but if, as in the 90s, to look beautiful and praised in the West, then our affairs are bad. Follow the rhetoric and composition of the guests in the program of V. Solovyov at "Russia-1"

[Karabin]

Quote: Nevsky_ZU

And here we are?

I agree with your concerns. Given the Western interests of the Russian elites, it is difficult to expect inflexibility from the Foreign Ministry. This has already repeatedly manifested itself both in Ukrainian-Donbass and Syrian affairs.

[g1v2]

The entire operation in Syria so far follows the pattern of the second Chechen one. The systematic squeezing out of the militants, grinding them with aircraft and artillery, and, not least, the search for those inside the militants who are ready to go over to our side. Like Kadyrov and the Yamadayev brothers, who suddenly surrendered to us the largest Chechen city - Gudermes (the formidable was founded by the Russians) and went over to our side. The same goes for work inside Syria. Many groups are ready to join whoever is stronger, there are many groups that have a truce with the Saa. We have experience, moreover, a victorious experience, and I think that there will also be transitions and knocking of the moderate on the immoderate, so that only something does not fall on them. But one must understand that the operation will definitely last no less than the second Chechen one, since the scale is larger and the level of replenishment of the Babakhov from abroad is also many times higher. Well, as for the supposedly 80-200 percent against Assad, this is ordinary enemy propaganda, moreover, religion in Syria does not play a decisive role at all. Syria has long been a secular state, and even in the ig the percentage of fanatics is extremely small. In Chechnya, the population was also not very disposed to the federal government in the 90s, and now it is one of the most loyal regions. There are no reasons to panic - there will be long and hard work, but Russia's chances of winning are quite good.

[family tree]

Quote: vorobey

well, fuck off the beach...

Yeah

Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-Igil coalition, provided that Moscow changes its views on the situation in Syria and ceases to support Assad, RIA Novosti reports a statement by State Department spokesman John Kirby.

I even remembered a joke, "Do you want checkers, or go ?!"
Hello oil!

[vorobey]

Quote: perepilka

Hello oil!

and sappers do not get sick ...

[family tree]

Quote: vorobey

and sappers do not get sick ... drinks

God, at TPU

[Coconut Tima]

This is not the worst loss for Russia. There is worse news! The Baltic countries refused to fight ISIS in the same coalition with Russia. The leaders of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia made this decision after a joint meeting in Palanga, according to the Latvian media.

[family tree]

Quote: Tim Coconuts

There is worse news! The Baltic countries refused to fight ISIS in the same coalition with Russia. The leaders of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia made this decision after a joint meeting in Palanga, according to the Latvian media.

Terrible! How is it without them
(This one, and the Baltic countries, who is this? Well, from this, from a military point of view )

[trantor]

"How many divisions do they have?" (With)

[ydjin]

Quote: vorobey

well, to hell with the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retribution, they have unshakable determination .. it’s better not to interfere, even if they don’t climb under the arm ..

I agree with you! Let the USA go on a hiking erotic journey. To be honest, got it! Who are they to dictate something to us? Sorry, got it!

[lukke]

If there were no Assad, they would mention the Donbass, there would be no Donbass, they would say about the lack of democracy in Russia. It has long been clear to me personally that the Anglo-Saxons are the enemies of Russia at the gene level and some kind of cooperation and conversations with them is self-deception. It is a pity that some Russians have not yet realized this, they are beginning to say that their rulers are evil, but the people are normal, and so on. No, guys, we are alien to them with our existence and that's it.

[Vadim237]

This coalition can already be safely sent away, they have already done their work there, and we are raking.

[Tor5]

Well, okay, in response, we will not take them into our coalition. Let's see whose coalition wins!

[communication]

and to hell with their opinion. They didn’t listen to us when they were warned, but now let them look and delve into it.

[vodolaz]

That is, the Americans support whoever they want, and we need to ask permission to whom to support? Isn't that too much honor.

[varov14]

Well, American braids would not be expressed in a veiled way - "the main tasks of the coalition are to make Syria one of the states of the United States." Everything is clear, you need a territory to gain a foothold, your own can become worthless. They say in Western Siberia they are buying land, partners.

[SAXA.SHURA]

Well, can't you see that we gave a fuck about Kirby and your coalition.

[Dezinto]

This is idiotic! Or Americanism.....or American (ah)ism...

"Don't support Assad, we'll love you and maybe we'll still destroy ISIS... or maybe not.... we'll clarify this in the office when you stop supporting Assad."

[venaya]

Quote: DEZINTO

This is idiotic! Or Americanism...

Perhaps this is true democracy !!!
When a gang of frank scumbags who call themselves a "coalition" (well, why not a gang) decided to impose their Gaulaters on a foreign country. And nothing, everyone is silent, as if everything is as it should be. Why not democracy?

[Aryan]

can they at least clearly explain why they are against Assad?

because this is an occasion for something more important to them
let, stska, say honestly
but the truth is they are weak

[Turk]

So the coalition is being created to fight ISIS or Assad? Baboon is undecided.

[inferno_nv]

How the Americans are already fed up with their double standards, statements, etc.!

[Hubun]

they will stick when we almost finish it, as in the Second World War

[platon4387]

The State Department blathers. And the operation REVENGE is underway !!!!!!!!!

[pts-m]

the Yankistan’s brain is completely ossified. he thinks in old principles ... whoever is not with us is against us. there is no other way ... or they scatter their brains when their guts + brains fly into the air from the “gift” of their friends Iblis.

[iliitchitch]

Jenny's laurels haunt Kirby, the initiative has long been with Putin, and this one is talking nonsense about some kind of role for Russia - like ask for a coalition, and we'll figure out which anus to put you in so as not to get dirty ourselves ...

[Zubr]

“Each member of the coalition must have a unified position in relation to the ISIS. If we are talking about Russia, then we do not see that its actions are consistent with the goals of the coalition, that is, the destruction of ISIS, ”Kirby said.

Donkey stubbornness..

The bastard understands that after stripping all the cream, I mean the shelf (gas, oil) of Russia for development. And this is already a serious bid for the pricing policy of hydrocarbons.

[HAM]

AND WE HAVE DIFFERENT "TASKS" !!

[Dezinto]

States may their endless - offers, conditions, claims, concerns - write on a piece of paper and take it there:

[BOB044]

“If Russia is serious about persecuting ISIS and changes its approach to military operations in Syria, fine. We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition can be. But so far this has not happened,” says John Kirby.

Suck gentlemen from the State Department, without you snotty we will deal with ISIS. And let the Baltic countries kiss you in the ass with a hickey.

[NIKNN]

If we do not support Assad, then we will fight ISIS in Tajikistan, if not closer. And these from the State Department will supply them with weapons. Syria must win and remain united under Assad.

[kepmor]

Quote: sober

I could be wrong, but along the way, the Americans are preparing to enter Syria on the ground. And they will tie our hands, and they also need to grab at least something for themselves! Of course, they will not climb alone, but as always they will collect a pack.

They won't climb! Zasssat! They have the election of a prezik on their nose, they are not up to Syria now, there is someone to die there!
Moreover, they will not be able to cope with their "freak fosterlings" with "little blood". But they will spoil in full! In "shit outpouring" they are great masters ...

[SIMM]

I would say better: As long as the US supports ISIS, there can be no coalition with them!

[Conscience]

Yes, you can't do business with them at all!

[Tusv]

He suggested that his youngest son correct the deuce in history - write an essay, what is Russian Truth - To the answer that we are studying world history in this way, I answer, name the countries with which we do not border?

[Conscience]

clowns, they are like a proverb - rush about like drunken barmaids
they see, they don't see...
they all need to be isolated.

[fa2998]

I don’t understand why the article was downvoted. The author pretty well described the situation about the position of the United States. He +. And if you are against such a position, express your indignation in the comments. By the way, I don’t like it either. But France has already gone to war, its positions in Europe are strong , maybe someone else will catch up (the Europeans were also fed up with this "Islamization"). And in the end, the Americans will be left alone on the platform, and they themselves will run to catch up!

[samara-58]

It's stuck! We need you, how ... all the words are not good, I will not continue, and so everyone knows!

[Afinogen]

State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition

If translated from diplomatic language into normal, it sounds like this: How much money we have invested in "ISIS" against Assad, but we have not achieved our goal, we need to remove it. You just won't be able to do anything.

[3officer]

Damn .. well, let's change Assad's passport, let it be .. Kirby, Rakhmattulin, Rabinovich ... it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter

[vorobey]

Quote: 3officer

Damn .. well, let's change Assad's passport, let it be .. Kirby, Rakhmattulin, Rabinovich ... it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter

or better yet, let Putin adopt him ...

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Russia practically adopted Syria ... Who is on us?

[Vladimirets]

Quote: 3officer

let's change Assad's passport let it be .. Kirby, Rakhmattulin, Rabinovich

Sidor Pafnutich Kolobochko.

[Barakuda]

Two by two is four. What can be negotiated? Politician Universities did not graduate, yet the “hedgehog” is understandable. The question is the price, or how?

[sober]

I could be wrong, but along the way, the Americans are preparing to enter Syria on the ground. And they will tie our hands, and they also need to grab at least something for themselves! Of course, they will not climb alone, but as always they will collect a pack.

[Alexander_]

And what other way do they have to get the territory, apparently only to get into it themselves.

[Stinger]

Who would doubt that. They will not rewrite their military doctrine because of Assad! It is known who threatens the whole world in general and the dollar in particular.

[sabakina]

Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-ISIS coalition, provided that Moscow

Spring 1945 of the year.
Stalin:
- Comrade Zhukov, so who will take Berlin? Us or them?...

[Barakuda]

There, in my opinion, if memory serves, the question was between Zhukov and Rokossovsky.

[afrikanez]

“If you support Assad and provide him with assistance, this does not meet the main tasks of the coalition”

The task of the coalition has become extremely clear, the collapse and lawlessness in Syria! But let the United States try to do the same at home, and we'll see how they react to this.

[quote]

Quote: SERGEY UI

Well, then the State Department went to X, Ygrik, th

They won't reach, the address is wrong. Fix it, y.

[Nightingale]

they don't get there, they don't get there. It's no worse if they get lost along the way

[Alexander 3]

They have a lot of gays there, they are not afraid.

[Nightingale]

While the monkey is trying to control something in 3,14ndos, nothing new will happen in their perception of the world around them. What a director, such are his actors in the play. And they go through the forest .... Whom to rule in Syria will be decided by the people of Syria, regardless of the wishes of the hamadryas because of the puddle.

[Vadim Zhivov]

Hang yourself striped homosexuals ... Look for MEMBERS IN THE COALITION elsewhere ... And without you, the Syrians will figure out who they need ...

[skate]

Russia destroys ISIS, and America nurtures ISIS. There are no common goals here and never will be.

[kartalovkolya]

Have they completely lost their minds, these same Yankees, have they already put themselves on a par with God? Until now, their entire struggle with the "bunch of bearded" fanatics has consisted of chatter and calls for the overthrow of Assad, and they bombed mainly Syrian facilities! Russia, in fact, proved who is the real fighter with this rabble (it’s hard to call the Islamic State), and who sits behind other people’s backs and quietly spoils, supplying weapons to the bandits! One such very "great" responded to Suvorov's ultimatum that the sky would fall into the Danube sooner than he would surrender Ishmael, and what ...? This is how these "installers of the new world order", seeing that Syria can be cleansed even without them, raised an utter yell!

[VeteranS]

The United States is terribly afraid that Russia on its own (with which it is doing an excellent job) will destroy terrorist demons in Syria, will enable the people of this long-suffering country to independently choose the path of their development without the State Department's bloody revolutions, and Russia in this important region of the world will further strengthen its military-political and economic positions. And the demand for Assad's resignation for the United States is just a cover for a more global game ... of rivalry with Russia. But this is my personal opinion ...

[F.Vastag]

ISIS is the brainchild of the States and the Saudis. What kind of "Coalition" can we talk about at all. This is the same as the United States (at one time) would have created a Coalition with the USSR against SAMOS, PINOCET, STRESSNER and other Fascist Geeks in Latin America. The USA is a country of TERRORIST No. 1 and it supports the same Terrorists, Religious Fanatics, Fascists and Thugs (all over the World) - like herself (To stop the Spread of Terrorism - we need to Destroy the Roots (Feeder) of Terror - that is, Eliminate the States themselves (Lair- Nest-Feeding Trough of all Thugs - from all over the World)

[ia-ai00]

State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition

Naturally, ISIS is FRIENDS at the State Department, not Assad. The United States cannot bomb its "brainchild", otherwise the wrath of ISIS will fall on the heads of the a/m/e/r/s.

[Same lech]

We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition can be. But so far this has not happened,” says John Kirby.

What brazen arrogance....US DEPARTMENT is doing us a favor...hypocrites.

[DPN]

They bought the Soviet people for COCA COLA and FANTA with the same success and they will buy the Russian.

[3officer]

Well, it seems to have begun with PEPSI and Mack .. Right now it won’t work

[MATROSKIN-53]

The dog barks, the caravan moves on! Let the gosdepovskie syavki bark. It will never be theirs. And then they decide who in which country who to be. Yes, you, gloomy chikotils, shameful teachers, do not meddle with your moralizing to Russia. And then it won’t take long to get a sopat ...

[Barakuda]

Quote: devis

They won't reach, the address is wrong. Fix it, y.

Here, however, the ancient Vedic wisdom. I may be wrong, BUT.
X - who studied at school, and Y is clear to everyone. And here And with a dash on top - the desire to create something great, the reunification of the male and female principles.
Please do not send.
And how did the "savages" know about it

[kotev19]

It can be seen what "serious" analyzes are being done in American intelligence!
“Each member of the coalition must have a unified position in relation to the ISIS. If we are talking about Russia, then we do not see that its actions are consistent with the goals of the coalition, that is, the destruction of IS» Kirby said.

And earlier, 70 years ago, the American intelligence officer Ralph Ingersoll wrote: "LET'S SIT AND THINK." Here they sit, but do not think!!!

[Belarus]

The very words and wordings of these earthly "geniuses" are surprising: the persecution of ISIS will change its approach to military operations in Syria, we will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation and its contribution to the operation in the coalition.
What persecution of ISIS - Russia destroys ISIS and America only prevents destruction.
What a change in approach to military operations - Russia is destroying terrorists and their infrastructure, unlike the Americans themselves and others like them.
Russia from the very beginning said that it was ready to discuss with everyone how to fight terrorists, in contrast to the pseudo-coalition created by the Americans.

In short, another nonsense and stupid excuses. In fact, the Americans do not even use double standards in politics and not only, but something similar to what they use in the cinema 5d images.

[Sega66]

Quote: sever.56

http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/393/plwf283.png

You can't say better about the West and its politics than Bashar al-Assad...!!!
We need the coalition, not the coalition we need. Russia,
in a little over two months, destroyed the bandits at times
more than the notorious "coalition" for more than a year.
It is not for them to dictate how we should act in this struggle and
on what conditions to join the coalition. We will also consider:
- do we need it so that some NATO general
indicated who to bomb and who not, and where and at what time
fly out for operations ... !!!

In fact, it's not even two months away...

[Cis-Urals]

We have our own effective coalition. Why do we need your tolerant one? We are not France, stop talking to us like we are on the sidelines. Russia will figure it out on its own, with its own priorities, tasks. Also you mattress covers, then we will drive around Europe with pissing rags

[dchegrinec]

We must make it clear to the West that they have only one right path: to be with us in a coalition, the other path is disastrous for them and cannot be replenished. Because if Russia turns its back on the West like a lousy dog, then this whole gang-watering can will be covered a copper basin! We have excellent prospects for cooperation with other countries.

[barclay]

Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-ISIS coalition, provided that Moscow changes its views on the situation in Syria and stops supporting Assad
From each of their words breathes endless arrogance and self-confidence.
Has the US State Department still not understood that Russia's actions in Syria do not need support and approval from the syshya?
Most likely, these pompous philosophical arguments are published by the "hegemon" for their vassals. So that, for example, kids from the Baltic states, and others like them, would not be disappointed in their "tutor".

[Alcoholic]

To "no" and no trial.
I don’t want to wait for friendly hugs from mattresses.
Better the most enemy than such a "friend"

[Gormenghast]

As long as the United States supports the illegitimate bloody tyrant Poroshenko and the fascist Yaytsenyuk, there can be no talk of any constructive interaction with the State Department. We will proceed from our own interests. It was necessary to help Iran get out from under illegal blasphemous sanctions - they helped. A friend of Assad needs help - we help. Iraq will ask for help to deal with the consequences of democratization (=IS) we will help. And the rest - to hell with butter.

[DPN]

More precisely, until the United States achieves its goal, there is no fucking talk about any coalition. Until there is equality in Russia, they will not reckon with us. Russia cannot be strong while some live in palaces, and the main population in huts, in addition, they still threaten to be driven out of the same huts into the street, or rather, only after the death of the last SOVIET PERSON.

[3officer]

Well, there is still time to live in a hut.) The generation of 1991 will live for a long time

[gladysheff2010]

Quote: Nevsky_ZU

The West will be adamant. And here we are?

Well, you’re in vain, after all, politics is the ability to hide intentions behind rhetoric and take actions that are beneficial for ourselves, which in this case we are “worse” than the Westerners: they have their own policy, we have our own! After all, we don’t really need assistants, the main thing is that they don’t get confused under their feet. And let the American generals command the Baltic fleet, and the Ukrainian military-industrial complex.

[mikh-korsakov]

It is not clear to me what prevents Russia from declaring the government of Ukraine, which organized the bloody massacre in Donbass and sent Nalyvaichenko to organize the bloody massacre in Odessa, illegitimate. Even if we assume that Assad destroyed someone from the opposition, the crimes of the Kyiv regime are enormous in their cruelty and cynicism. Our enemies accuse us. that we organized the uprising in Donbass. Let it be so, although Russia influenced 95% of the uprisings not with its resources, but with its existence, which you hypocritical creatures cannot refute. Well, so be it, why are you Americans, and didn’t you Americanolises help the opposition in Syria with both weapons and training. and they did it brazenly. Therefore, I do not understand all these curtsies to Ukraine under the guise of a fraternal people, trying to become their relatives.

[gloomy fox]

Yes, I don’t care what they say in America, I’m tired of it. It’s disgusting like a bitter radish to the point of nausea. Russia just go ahead, don’t listen to anyone, but continue to stick to your line and do everything as it sees fit.

[Evilblacker]

Quote: VeteranS

The United States is terrified that Russia will independently (which it copes with very well) destroy the terrorist demons in Syria, will give the people of this long-suffering country the opportunity to independently choose the path of their development without the State Department’s bloody revolutions, and Russia will further strengthen its military-political in this important region of the world and economic positions.

We must always remember the most important things:

And no concessions.

[Aleksander]

If you support Assad and provide him with assistance, this does not answer main tasks coalitions

Oops! Means the main task coalition - non-support (overthrow) of Assad after all?! I let it slip, you simpleton. What about ISIS?

[pvv113]

statement by State Department spokesman John Kirby

It was also not enough for all sorts of Mr. Kirbys to set conditions for us ("Mr." does not mean "Misters")

[AlexTires]

There will be no coalition: the Americans will not adapt to Russia, and the Russian Federation (not to mention Iran) will not adapt to the United States. Assad will try to recapture the most important territories and preserve the situation, ISIS will remain in the Sunni regions of Syria and Iraq and they will try to isolate this territory as much as possible. There is no one willing to carry out a ground operation “to the bitter end” even among the local natives. Everyone solves their own local problem.

[Comments]

State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition

Indeed, as long as NATO persecutes Assad’s legally elected government and supports the bandits who have taken up arms, there can be no coalitions. Let the State Department call on its citizens to take up arms to show “true” democracy to the rest of the world

[Jarilo]

America needs a coalition to bind everyone with blood, its crimes against humanity, its dark deeds. Do we need a coalition with America? If only to get dirty.

Russia acts openly, absolutely transparently, without violating any international treaties.

[Catafract]

Assad is afraid to show his nose even a couple of kilometers from the Alawite zone; this “victorious offensive” has been going on for more than one year.
Why does the Russian Federation hold on to Iranian puppets against which 80% of the Syrian population?

[xoma58]

Funny! A coalition with whom, the Chukhonians or what?

[Junior, I]

Isn’t it time for them to move to the outskirts of History!
They don’t want to see us in the coalition while we support Assad, even if they blather behind a puddle.

[A.Lex]

Oh, yes, and also Putin must remove himself from power, we must give Siberia to them... did I forget anything?

[Zai pali]

Who needs this coalition? Kill ISIS and American puppets!

[Wolka]

then let the State Department from the Yankees be left alone in despicable loneliness, well, stupid...

[boris697]

“If you support Assad and provide him with assistance, this does not meet the main objectives of the coalition,” noted John Kirby... Clearly he says that the goal of the coalition is the removal of Assad, and not the fight against ISIS

[Al_oriso]

They create coalitions and conduct discussions and debates, but Russia has been involved in the matter for a long time. The Americans will definitely get involved at the most opportune moment for them. Russia is obliged to calculate all options for the development of events, and doing this will not be easy.

[Aandrewsir]

In my opinion, supporting the regime of Bashar al-Assad does not in any way prevent the destruction of the Islamic State. And do we really need this “coalition” led by the United States? They believe that everyone in the world should “adapt to them.” But “fuck them in all their impudent non...Greek faces!!!”

[Yuriy Nikolayevich]

This is a signal, a signal that if the Russian Federation does not retreat from Syria, the United States will redirect its efforts to Ukraine. The refugees have caught up enough. Poroshenko adopted a law on the recruitment of foreigners who do not even have documents for military service.
They smell unpleasantly near our borders. Good luck to the VSN.
God forbid I'm wrong.

[Otshelnik]

Look how good it is, it breaks...))) what a fool...

[Russia]

the fate of Bashar al-Assad should not become the topic of international forums, since the future of the president is an internal matter of the country, and it will be determined by the Syrian people.

But International law and sovereignty are not for the Anglo-Saxons!
By and large, our Aerospace Forces are now preventing this “coalition” from striking the Syrian army under the pretext of “democratization and the fight against ISIS”!

[Evgtan]

Vladimir Putin said that terrorists will be surely found, and all accomplices will be held accountable. Panic reigns in Washington.

[nazar_0753]

Well, if you don’t want it, whatever you want. We offered...

[Lelek]

“If Russia is serious about pursuing the Islamic State and changes its approach to military operations in Syria, great. We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the coalition operation might be. But that’s not the case yet.”

There is no demand for “NO”. We can do without an alliance with the United States. But if the United States reconsiders its approach to the mentioned problem, then Russia may agree to negotiate their (US) participation in our coalition, although faith in the Anglo-Saxons = 0.

[cap]

Quote: Dr. Bormental

Dr. Bormenthal (2) RU Today, 15:39 ↑

The doctor's diagnosis will be confirmed by an autopsy
Where did the diagnosis certificate go? I left it on the table.
Doctor, didn't you take it?

[Valkh]

Well, accordingly: as long as the State Department is screwing with Assad, there can be no talk of any single coalition!!!!

[BISMARCK94]

Why don't we need their coalition! We have our own with Assad and Sushki!

[evge-malyshev]

What a cheek! They still dare to set any conditions! Put Russia in some sixty-nth place in your “anti-ISIS” coalition? Can't wait...

[sw6513]

We have a cunning neighbor China - if only we could lure him to our side, then no coalition is needed... But it’s unlikely - they are always and everywhere and it seems like they don’t exist...

[sharp-lad]

Into a coalition with terrorists? They won't take it! There's no need for that! Russia is fighting terrorism, not spreading it!

[RUSIVAN]

Oh, I really want it...

[sharp-lad]

Democracy and human freedoms in action: In Saudi Arabia, the poet was sentenced to death for renouncing Islam. And where are the American supplies of democracy on the wings of bombers?

[Vlad5307]

“If you support Assad and provide him with assistance, this does not meet the main tasks of the coalition”

They have clearly defined their goals in Syria - the states are fighting not ISIS, but Assad! and they have long trusted the will of the Syrian people, like all other peoples of the Earth. Only business, and nothing more! They don’t need any values, but only one value - to dictate their will to everyone, not to be responsible for anything, and through this to earn fortunes stained with the blood of the peoples of the countries to which they bring their pseudo-democracy!

[nail]

I don’t understand why the Ammers are going into Syria? We are there at the request of the legitimate government. What about them?

[cergey51046]

I wouldn’t sit next to your country of renegades to shit, let alone negotiate.

[iouris]

Inscriptions "For Paris!" on the bombs with a black felt pen - a pitiful sight. Paris is used for "wiring".

[bylec]

But we don’t need to set conditions! If you want, we’ll set our own.

[win]

They throw the fool around in a circle, what if Russia changes its position

We don’t need to set conditions.

Everything in life is conditional...