Military Review

State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition

123
Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-Igilov coalition, provided that Moscow changes its views on the situation in Syria and stops supporting Al-Assad, reports RIA News statement by State Department representative John Kirby.


State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition


“Each member of the coalition should have a common position in relation to the IG. If we are talking about Russia, then we do not see that its actions correspond to the goals of the coalition, that is, to destroy the IS, ”said Kirby.

“If you support Assad and assist him, this does not meet the main objectives of the coalition,” he said.

“If Russia is seriously focused on pursuing the IS and changing its approach to military actions in Syria, fine. We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the coalition operation might be. But so far this has not happened, ”says John Kirby.

Earlier, Moscow has repeatedly stated that the fate of Bashar al-Assad should not become the topic of international forums, since the future of the president is an internal affair of the country, and it will be determined by the Syrian people.
Photos used:
AP Photo / Luis M. Alvarez
123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. vorobey
    vorobey 21 November 2015 13: 10 New
    67
    well, and the fuck from the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retaliation they have an unshakable resolve .. it’s better not to interfere even if they don’t climb by the arm ..
    1. cniza
      cniza 21 November 2015 13: 14 New
      27
      Quote: vorobey
      well, and the fuck from the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retaliation they have an unshakable resolve .. it’s better not to interfere even if they don’t climb by the arm ..



      In a circle they start a fool, and suddenly Russia will change its position ... do not measure by yourself and you will be happy.
      1. Temples
        Temples 21 November 2015 13: 15 New
        34
        “If Russia is seriously focused on pursuing the IS and changing its approach to military actions in Syria, fine. We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the coalition operation might be. But so far this has not happened, ”says John Kirby.

        Russia is not aimed.
        Russia is simply destroying your pets.
        While Kibri will discuss "contributions to the operation," I think our last terrorist will be buried in the ground.
        1. Nick
          Nick 21 November 2015 13: 27 New
          17
          Quote: Temples
          While Kibri will discuss "contributions to the operation," I think our last terrorist will be buried in the ground.

          The Syrian army will be burying, and our task is to ensure the preparation of "raw materials" for it, so to speak
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 21 November 2015 13: 28 New
            10
            Quote: Nick
            and our task is to ensure for her the preparation of "raw materials", so to speak


            and here we only supply raw materials ... laughing
            1. avg
              avg 21 November 2015 14: 00 New
              +6
              Mattresses, as always, in the stupid "Psaki style" give out wishful thinking.
              We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition might be.

              They naively pretend that they do not understand that we will not enter the coalition under the auspices of the United States. And the interaction proposal is just a “cooperation proposal”. And such suggestions, as practice shows, are better understood by those who have already encountered the "faithful", and the mattresses so far, out of habit, are hoping to stay overseas.
              1. cniza
                cniza 21 November 2015 14: 05 New
                +6
                Quote: avg

                They naively pretend that they do not understand that we will not enter the coalition under the auspices of the United States. And the interaction proposal is just a "cooperation proposal."



                They rush about from the fact that they don’t know where to run, what to clutch at, that’s boring. They understand everything perfectly, but they cannot change anything, as it used to be.
                1. SRC P-15
                  SRC P-15 21 November 2015 14: 11 New
                  +5
                  We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition might be.

                  While you are preparing for a discussion, Russia is investing so much in the operation against ISIS that soon, the coalition’s opinion will not interest it!
                  1. cniza
                    cniza 21 November 2015 14: 16 New
                    +5
                    Quote: SRC P-15
                    We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition might be.

                    While you are preparing for a discussion, Russia is investing so much in the operation against ISIS that soon, the coalition’s opinion will not interest it!



                    The moment has already come from which their opinion does not interest us, moreover, we are already pointing out their stupidity and miscalculations ... here they are, and all the rage, the initiative has sailed away.
                  2. Dr. Bormental
                    Dr. Bormental 21 November 2015 15: 39 New
                    +2
                    Believe me, when everything is finished, America will assign all the laurels to itself. They won’t remember us either. Obama will receive the 2nd Peace Prize. And they will tell us - you bombed civilians, here you have more sanctions ...
                  3. The comment was deleted.
              2. Fat
                Fat 21 November 2015 14: 24 New
                27
                something like that
              3. Fat
                Fat 21 November 2015 14: 25 New
                10
                and so the frogs are parasites
                1. Catafract
                  Catafract 21 November 2015 15: 20 New
                  -21
                  do not smack bullshit, bullshit hurts, until victory in Syria as I walk to Mars. Assad is afraid to show a couple of kilometers from the Alawite’s area of ​​residence of the nose, this is their "victorious offensive" lasts more than one year.
                  Why the Russian Federation keep puppets of Iran against which 80% of the Syrian population?
                  1. family
                    family tree 21 November 2015 15: 29 New
                    +9
                    Quote: Catafract
                    Why the Russian Federation keep puppets of Iran against which 80% of the Syrian population?
                    Here, without checking, give out such numbers!
                    Otvelev 80% then belay ? 150, no less! The old people, they said that it happened 300, but we don’t believe them very much, they will lie, they won’t take expensive, and you’ll check the hell belay laughing
            2. Prisoner
              Prisoner 21 November 2015 21: 52 New
              0
              Not only raw materials as it turned out. But witty, you will not say anything. laughing
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Phantom Revolution
            Phantom Revolution 21 November 2015 14: 19 New
            +3
            Quote: Temples
            While Kibri will discuss "contributions to the operation," I think our last terrorist will be buried in the ground.

            The United States has the main goal, to attribute all the merits in the fight against the ISIS to the United States. So to say, to leave the winners, and therefore they are talking about their alleged success in the fight against terrorists, but Russia only prevents them.

            When the igil presses they will declare themselves (therefore they would like Russia to be in the American coalition, and not vice versa) as winners and in all media they will blow about them, and not about Russia. (the analogy of the 2 world war, at the end they climbed on the side of the winners and declared themselves the main assistant, and then, slowly, due to the media, was almost the only one who fought against the Hitler coalition)
            1. family
              family tree 21 November 2015 16: 16 New
              0
              Quote: Phantom Revolution
              and declared themselves the main assistant, and then slowly at the expense of the media, almost the only one who fought against the Hitler coalition

              Alexander Vasilievich, like that, (legend, cho what , for which I bought ...) during an alliance with the Austrians, I proposed to make a medal, on the Obverse: God is with us and the servant, on the reverse, "yes, God is with them, miserable." Retelling, start kicking, thought, but do not care. To remove these epaulettes, and how the admirals of the Ukrainian fleet
              "I AM, swimming, on a boat, to the breeched mother, from which, from what, there is no water in the fairway ... "
      2. 79807420129
        79807420129 21 November 2015 13: 21 New
        15
        Yes, you would go diggers with your coalition to bombard the excavators, once you and I have to set conditions, we need to work, striped hoopoes climb into the bosses, look not hegemony over, and Assad will not surrender.
      3. vovanpain
        vovanpain 21 November 2015 13: 36 New
        22
        Quote: 79807420129
        Yes, would you go whale whales with your coalition to bomb excavators,

        I fully support and join.
      4. Reserve officer
        Reserve officer 21 November 2015 14: 13 New
        +8
        “If you support Assad and assist him, this does not meet the main tasks of the coalition”

        Save the creator from such a coalition. We, by chance, were not confused with US vassals?
        Russia destroys terrorists, but what this coalition does is a big question.
        1. Dr. Bormental
          Dr. Bormental 21 November 2015 15: 46 New
          0
          the main task of the coalition is to cure under amers and to wave.
        2. captain
          captain 21 November 2015 21: 02 New
          0
          Mariupol had to be taken to 2014 (I express my opinion and do not try to blame or teach anyone), it was a strategic mistake of our leadership. After the capture of Mariupol, Ukraine as a state would cease to exist within modern borders. Sanctions simply would not be in sight. Nobody would remember about Crimea, there would be 3-5 states and the massacres in the Donbass would come to an end. And our aircraft would not undermine IS.
      5. meriem1
        meriem1 21 November 2015 14: 26 New
        +4
        Quote: cniza
        Quote: vorobey
        well, and the fuck from the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retaliation they have an unshakable resolve .. it’s better not to interfere even if they don’t climb by the arm ..



        In a circle they start a fool, and suddenly Russia will change its position ... do not measure by yourself and you will be happy.


        Nothing new. The Baltic states have come forward. We will not be in the coalition against ISIS if Russia is in it !!! Where does the wind hang ... everyone understands.

        And We were upset (((One and a half unsold soldiers with a defective spirit will not help us laughing Weep directly from this misfortune ....
      6. varov14
        varov14 21 November 2015 19: 09 New
        0
        At least you would have presented your protege, whom you need to support, and so don't understand anything. Idle talk.
      7. guzik007
        guzik007 21 November 2015 22: 35 New
        0
        For some reason, these whores did not surprise me at all.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. sever.56
      sever.56 21 November 2015 13: 16 New
      21
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/393/plwf283.png

      Better about the West and its politics than Bashar al-Assad and you will not say ... !!!
      We need coalitions, not the coalition we need. Russia,
      for more than two months, she destroyed the bandits at times
      more than the notorious “coalition” for more than a year.
      It’s not for them to dictate what we should do in this struggle and
      under what conditions to enter the coalition. We will still think:
      - Do we need this so that some NATO general
      indicated - whom to bomb and who not, and where and at what time
      fly to operations ... !!!
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 21 November 2015 16: 27 New
        0
        Quote: sever.56
        Russia,
        for more than two months, she destroyed the bandits at times
        more than the notorious “coalition” for more than a year.

        Let's be honest, it’s easier for us, we have more bandits in Syria. wink
    5. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 21 November 2015 13: 17 New
      +9
      West will be adamant. And here we are?
      I do not want to crap, but more and more often in the Russian media I start to hear political scientists from the Syrian free republic. Already established interaction VKS with moderate. If the Russian authorities are willing and ready to take control of the Americans in the PAS and the opposition to Assad, then they are honored and praised, and if, like in 90, to look beautiful and praised in the West, our deeds are bad. Follow the rhetoric and the composition of the guests in the program V. Solovyov on "Russia-1"
      1. Karabin
        Karabin 21 November 2015 13: 35 New
        +6
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        And here we are?

        I agree with your concerns. Given the Western interests of Russian elites, it is difficult to expect adherence from the Foreign Ministry. What has repeatedly manifested itself both in Ukrainian-Donbass affairs and in Syria.
      2. g1v2
        g1v2 21 November 2015 16: 39 New
        0
        The entire operation in Syria so far is following the pattern of the second Chechen one. The systematic squeezing out of militants, their grinding by aviation and artillery is also important - the search inside the militants is for those who are ready to switch to our side. Like the Kadyrov and the Yamadayev brothers, who suddenly surrendered to us the largest Chechen city, Gudermes (the terrible was founded by the Russians) and switched to our side. The work is also going on inside Syria. Many groups are ready to join the one who is stronger, there are many groups in which a truce with saa. We have experience, and the experience is victorious, and I think that there will also be transitions and knocking of moderates by immoderates, so that nothing falls on them. But we must understand that the operation will definitely last no less than the second Chechen one, since the scale is larger and the level of replenishment from abroad of the Bakhs is also many times higher. Well, as for supposedly 80-200 percent against al-Assad, this is ordinary enemy propaganda, moreover, religion in Syria does not have a decisive role at all. Syria has long been a secular state, and even in ig the percentage of fanatics is extremely small. In Chechnya, the population was also not too disposed to the federal government in the 90s, and now it is one of the most loyal regions. There are no reasons for panic - there will be long and hard work, but Russia has quite good chances of victory.
    6. family
      family tree 21 November 2015 13: 21 New
      +2
      Quote: vorobey
      Well, fuck the beach ...

      Yeah
      Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-Igil coalition, provided that Moscow changes its views on the situation in Syria and ceases to support Assad, RIA Novosti reports a statement by State Department spokesman John Kirby.

      I even remembered the joke, "You checkers, or go ?!"
      Hello, fuel oil! hi
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 21 November 2015 13: 25 New
        +3
        Quote: perepilka
        Hello, fuel oil!


        and sappers do not get sick ... drinks
        1. family
          family tree 21 November 2015 13: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: vorobey
          and sappers do not get sick ... drinks

          God, in TPU what drinks
    7. Coconut Tima
      Coconut Tima 21 November 2015 13: 42 New
      +6
      This is not the worst loss for Russia. There is worse news! The Baltic countries refused to fight IS in one coalition with Russia. The leaders of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia made this decision after a joint meeting in Palanga, according to Latvian media.
      1. family
        family tree 21 November 2015 14: 48 New
        +3
        Quote: coconut tim
        There is worse news! The Baltic countries refused to fight IS in one coalition with Russia. The leaders of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia made this decision after a joint meeting in Palanga, according to Latvian media.

        Horror! As if without them, then recourse
        (This, and the Baltic countries, who is this? Well, from this, from a military point of view belay )
      2. trantor
        trantor 21 November 2015 16: 50 New
        +2
        "And how many divisions do they have?" (with)
    8. ydjin
      ydjin 21 November 2015 13: 57 New
      +2
      Quote: vorobey
      well, and the fuck from the beach ... we have more sun and sand ... and in general ... we have completely different goals ... we have retaliation they have an unshakable resolve .. it’s better not to interfere even if they don’t climb by the arm ..

      I agree with you! Let the United States go on foot erotic journey. To be honest, got it! Who are they to dictate something to us? Sorry, got it!
    9. lukke
      lukke 21 November 2015 14: 34 New
      +3
      If there had been no Assad, the Donbass would have been mentioned, there would have been no Donbass, they would have said about the lack of democracy in Russia. I personally have long understood - the Anglo-Saxons are the enemies of Russia at the gene level and some kind of cooperation and talking with them is self-deception. It is a pity that some Russians still have not realized this, they begin to say that they have evil rulers, and normal people, etc. No guys, we are alien to them in our existence and that’s it.
    10. Vadim237
      Vadim237 21 November 2015 14: 53 New
      +1
      This coalition can already be safely sent to hell, they have already done their work there, and we are scooping up.
    11. Tor5
      Tor5 21 November 2015 17: 02 New
      0
      Well, okay, in return we won’t take them into our coalition. Let's see whose coalition takes!
    12. communication
      communication 21 November 2015 17: 30 New
      0
      Yes, and to their hell theirs is their opinion. They did not listen to us when they were warned, and now they are looking and delving into the pus.
    13. vodolaz
      vodolaz 21 November 2015 17: 37 New
      0
      That is, the Americans support the one they want, but we need to ask the permission of whom to support? Is there too much honor.
    14. varov14
      varov14 21 November 2015 19: 24 New
      0
      Well ameri.kosa, would not be covertly expressed - "the main tasks of the coalition are to make one of the states of the United States from Syria." Everything is clear, the territory is necessary to gain a foothold, its own may become worthless. They say in Western Siberia they buy zemlyatse, partners.
    15. SAXA.SHURA
      SAXA.SHURA 22 November 2015 09: 33 New
      0
      Well, is it really not visible that we scattered horseradish on Kirby and your coalition.
  2. Dezinto
    Dezinto 21 November 2015 13: 10 New
    +8
    This is idiocy! Or Americanism ..... or American (s) meas ...

    "Do not support Assad, we will love you and maybe we will destroy the igil all the same ... or maybe not .... we will clarify this in the office when you stop supporting Assad."
    1. venaya
      venaya 21 November 2015 13: 28 New
      +5
      Quote: DEZINTO
      This is idiocy! Or Americanism ....

      Perhaps this is true democracy !!!
      When a gang of frank thugs calling themselves a "coalition" (well, not a gang) decided to impose their gaulers on a foreign country. And nothing, everyone is silent, as it’s all. Well, what is not democracy?
    2. Aryan
      Aryan 21 November 2015 14: 21 New
      +1
      can they even clearly explain why they are against Assad?

      because this is an occasion for something more important for them
      let them say honestly
      but the truth is weak for them
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Turk
    Turk 21 November 2015 13: 13 New
    15
    So is a coalition created to fight ISIS or Assad? Baboon is not defined.
  5. inferno_nv
    inferno_nv 21 November 2015 13: 13 New
    +5
    How Americans already got their double standards, statements, etc.! am
  6. Hubun
    Hubun 21 November 2015 13: 14 New
    +8
    they will be smeared when we almost finish, as in WWII
  7. platon4387
    platon4387 21 November 2015 13: 16 New
    +4
    The State Department blathers. And the operation REMUNERATION is in progress !!!!!!!!!
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. pts-m
    pts-m 21 November 2015 13: 18 New
    +3
    Yankistan’s brain is completely numb. It thinks of old principles ... whoever is not with us is against us. There is no other way ... or they scatter their brains when their guts + brains fly in from the “gift” of their friends and Iblises.
  10. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 21 November 2015 13: 19 New
    +4
    Jenny’s laurels do not give Kirby peace, Putin has long had the initiative, and this one’s rubbish about some role of Russia - ask for a coalition, and we’ll figure out what kind of anus to put you in so that you don’t get dirty ...
  11. Zubr
    Zubr 21 November 2015 13: 20 New
    +4
    “Each member of the coalition should have a common position in relation to the IG. If we are talking about Russia, then we do not see that its actions correspond to the goals of the coalition, that is, to destroy the IS, ”said Kirby.

    laughing Donkey stubbornness .. smile

    The bastard understands that after cleansing all the cream, I mean the shelf (gas, oil) of Russia for development go. And this is a serious bid for hydrocarbon pricing policy.
  12. HAM
    HAM 21 November 2015 13: 21 New
    16
    And WE HAVE DIFFERENT "TASKS" !!
  13. Dezinto
    Dezinto 21 November 2015 13: 21 New
    11
    States may their infinite - offers, conditions, claims, concerns - write on a piece of paper and take the boooo there:
  14. BOB044
    BOB044 21 November 2015 13: 23 New
    +3

    “If Russia is seriously focused on pursuing the IS and changing its approach to military actions in Syria, fine. We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the coalition operation might be. But so far this has not happened, ”says John Kirby.
    Gentlemen from the State Department to suck, without you snotty, we’ll deal with the IG. And let the Baltic countries kiss you in the ass with a hickey. hi
  15. NIKNN
    NIKNN 21 November 2015 13: 23 New
    +8
    If we don’t support Assad, then we will fight with IS in Tajikistan, if not closer. And these from the State Department will supply them with weapons. Syria must win and remain united, led by Assad. hi
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 21 November 2015 14: 27 New
      0
      Quote: sober
      I could be wrong, but along the way the Americans are preparing to enter Syria on the ground. And our hands will be tied, and they also need to grab something! Of course, not only they will climb, but as always they will collect their pack.

      Do not climb! Zassssat! They have a prezik election on their nose, now they are not up to Syria, there is someone to die for!
      Especially since they can’t cope with their “upright ugly creatures” with “little blood.” But they will spoil the program in full! In the "shit" they boool big masters ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  16. SIMM
    SIMM 21 November 2015 13: 24 New
    +4
    I would say better: As long as the USA supports ISIS - there can be no coalition with them!
    1. Conscience
      Conscience 21 November 2015 13: 28 New
      +6
      Yes, you can’t have any business with them at all!
  17. Tusv
    Tusv 21 November 2015 13: 26 New
    +1
    He suggested that the youngest son correct the two in history, write an essay, what is Russian truth - To the answer that we are studying world history, I answer, name the countries with which we do not border?
  18. Conscience
    Conscience 21 November 2015 13: 26 New
    +3
    clowns, they’re like a proverb - rushing about like drunk barmaids lol
    then see then do not see ... winked
    they all need to be isolated in the fool. wassat
  19. fa2998
    fa2998 21 November 2015 13: 27 New
    +1
    I don’t understand why to minus the article. The author pretty well described the situation about the position of the USA. He +. And if you are against such a position, express your indignation in the comments. By the way, I also don’t like it. But France has already gone to war, its positions in Europe are strong , maybe someone will catch up (Europeans also got this "Islamization"). And in the end, the Americans will be left alone on the platform and they will run to catch up! hi
  20. samara-58
    samara-58 21 November 2015 13: 28 New
    +1
    In stuck! We need you, how ... all are not asking for good words, I will not continue, and so everyone knows!
  21. Afinogen
    Afinogen 21 November 2015 13: 28 New
    +3
    State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition



    If you translate from diplomatic into normal, it sounds like this: How much money we invested in the “igil” against Assad, but we did not succeed, we must remove it. laughing Only you will not succeed.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  22. 3officer
    3officer 21 November 2015 13: 29 New
    +7
    Damn .. well, let Assad change the passport let it be .. Kirby, Rakhmattulin, Rabinovich ... no matter the differencelaughing
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 21 November 2015 13: 33 New
      +3
      Quote: 3officer
      Damn .. well, let Assad change the passport let it be .. Kirby, Rakhmattulin, Rabinovich ... no matter the differencelaughing


      better yet, let Putin adopt him ... laughing
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 21 November 2015 14: 33 New
        +2
        Russia has practically adopted Syria ... Who is on us?
    2. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 21 November 2015 16: 30 New
      0
      Quote: 3officer
      let Assad change the passport let it be .. Kirby, Rakhmattulin, Rabinovich

      Sidor Pafnutich Kolobochko. yes
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. Barakuda
    Barakuda 21 November 2015 13: 30 New
    +1
    Two by two is four. What can you agree on there? They didn’t finish the political university, nevertheless it’s understandable. The question is price, or how?
  25. sober
    sober 21 November 2015 13: 31 New
    0
    I could be wrong, but along the way the Americans are preparing to enter Syria on the ground. And our hands will be tied, and they also need to grab something! Of course, not only they will climb, but as always they will collect their pack.
    1. Alexander_
      Alexander_ 21 November 2015 14: 41 New
      0
      And what other way do they have territory to get, apparently only to get into.
  26. Stinger
    Stinger 21 November 2015 13: 31 New
    +1
    Who would doubt that. But they will not rewrite their military doctrine because of Assad! It is known who threatens the whole world in general and the dollar in particular.
  27. sabakina
    sabakina 21 November 2015 13: 31 New
    +3
    Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-Igil coalition, provided that Moscow

    Spring 1945 of the year.
    Stalin:
    -Comrade Zhukov, so who will take Berlin? We or they? ...
    1. Barakuda
      Barakuda 21 November 2015 13: 52 New
      0
      There, in my opinion, if memory serves, the question was between Zhukov and Rokossovsky.
  28. afrikanez
    afrikanez 21 November 2015 13: 31 New
    +2
    “If you support Assad and assist him, this does not meet the main tasks of the coalition”
    The task of the coalition has become extremely clear, the collapse and lawlessness in Syria! But let the United States try to do the same thing at home, but we'll see how they react to this.
  29. quote
    quote 21 November 2015 13: 31 New
    +1
    Quote: SERGEY UI
    Well then the State Department went to X, igrik, th repeat

    Do not reach the address with an error. Correct, gamer.
    1. Nightingale
      Nightingale 21 November 2015 13: 38 New
      +1
      if they don’t reach, they won’t. It’s not worse if they get lost along the way smile
    2. Alexander 3
      Alexander 3 21 November 2015 13: 38 New
      +1
      They have a lot of gays there, they’re not afraid.
  30. Nightingale
    Nightingale 21 November 2015 13: 34 New
    +4
    While the monkey is trying to control something with 3,14ndos, nothing new will happen in their perception of the outside world. What a director, such are his artists in the play. And they go through the forest .... To whom the people of Syria will decide to rule in Syria, regardless of the wishbones of hamadrils from behind a puddle.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  31. Vadim Zhivov
    Vadim Zhivov 21 November 2015 13: 36 New
    +3
    Hang striped homosexuals ... Look for a MEMBER OF COALITION elsewhere ... And without you, the Syrians will figure out who they need ... am am
  32. skat
    skat 21 November 2015 13: 40 New
    +6
    Russia destroys ISIS, and America fosters ISIS. There are no single goals here and never will be.
  33. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 21 November 2015 13: 43 New
    +4
    Did they survive these very most Yankees from their minds, have set themselves on a par with God? Until now, their entire struggle with the "bunch of bearded" savages has consisted of chatter and calls for the overthrow of Assad, and they mostly bombed Syrian sites! Russia, in fact, proved who the real fighter with this rabble (to call the Islamic state the language does not turn), and who is sitting behind other people's backs and quietly crap, supplying arms to the bandits! One such very “great” to Suvorov’s ultimatum replied that soon the sky would fall on the Danube than he would hand over Ishmael and what ...? And so these "installers of a new world order", seeing that even without them Syria could be cleansed and raised an utter horror!
  34. VeteranS
    VeteranS 21 November 2015 13: 52 New
    +6
    The US is panicky afraid that Russia, on its own (with which it is doing very well), will destroy demon terrorists in Syria, will enable the people of this long-suffering country to choose their own development path without the State Bloody Revolutions, and Russia in this important region of the world will further strengthen its military-political and economic positions. And the demand for Assad’s resignation for the United States is just a cover for a more global game ... for rivalry with Russia. But this is my personal opinion ...
  35. F.Vastag
    F.Vastag 21 November 2015 13: 53 New
    +7
    ISIS - The brainchild of the States and Saudis. What kind of "Coalition" can we talk about? It is the same that the United States (at one time) would create a Coalition with the USSR against SAMOSA, KNOWLEDGE, STRESSNER and other Fascist Geeks in Latin America. The USA is the country TERRORIST No. 1 and it supports the same Terrorists of Religious Zealots, Fascists and Thugs (all over the World) - as it is itself (To stop the Spread of Terrorism - you need to Destroy the Roots (Feeding Bowl) of the Terror - that is, Eliminate the States themselves (Lair- Nest Feeder of all Scumbags - from all over the World)
  36. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 21 November 2015 13: 59 New
    +6
    State Department: as long as Moscow supports Assad, there can be no talk of a single coalition

    Naturally, the State Department ISIS walks in FRIENDS, not Assad. The USA cannot bomb its “brainchild,” or else the anger of ISIS will fall on the heads of a / m / e / r / s.
  37. Same lech
    Same lech 21 November 2015 13: 59 New
    +4
    We will be ready to discuss with the Russian Federation what its contribution to the operation in the coalition might be. But so far this is not, ”said John Kirby.

    What a blatant arrogance .... US STATE DEPARTMENT does us a favor ... hypocrites.
    1. DPN
      DPN 21 November 2015 14: 43 New
      -5
      They bought the Soviet people for Coca Cola and Fantu with the same success and they will buy the Russian.
      1. 3officer
        3officer 21 November 2015 14: 56 New
        +1
        Well, it seems like it started with PEPSI and Mac ... tongue
  38. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 21 November 2015 14: 00 New
    +6
    The dog barks, the caravan is coming! Let the State Departments bark. Never will be in theirs. And then they decide to whom in which country whom to be. Yes you gloomy chikotil, shameful teachers do not meddle with your moralizing towards Russia. And even on the hill for a short time to get ...
  39. Barakuda
    Barakuda 21 November 2015 14: 02 New
    0
    Quote: devis
    Do not reach the address with an error. Correct, gamer.

    Here, however, ancient Vedic wisdom. I may be wrong, BUT.
    X - who studied at school, and Y is clear to everyone. And here And with a dash from above - the desire to create something great, the reunion of masculine and feminine.
    Please do not send.
    And how did savages like everyone knew about it what
  40. kotev19
    kotev19 21 November 2015 14: 12 New
    +1
    It can be seen what "serial" analyzes are done in American intelligence!
    “Each member of the coalition should have common positions in relation to the IG. If we are talking about Russia, then we do not see that its actions are consistent with the goals of the coalition, that is, the destruction of the Islamic State» Said Kirby.

    And earlier, 70 years ago, the American intelligence officer Ralph Ingersoll wrote: "WE SEE AND THINK." So they sit, but they don’t think !!! laughing
  41. Belarus
    Belarus 21 November 2015 14: 12 New
    +1
    The words and formulations of these earthly “geniuses” themselves are surprising: the persecution of ISIS, will change its approach to military operations in Syria, we will be ready to discuss with Russia and its contribution to the operation in the coalition.
    What is the persecution of ISIS - Russia destroys ISIS and America only interferes with the destruction.
    What a change in approach to military operations - Russia destroys terrorists and their infrastructure, unlike the Americans themselves and others like them.
    Russia from the very beginning said that it was ready to discuss with everyone how to deal with terrorists, in contrast to the pseudo-coalition created by the Americans.

    In short, another nonsense and stupid excuses. In fact, Americans use not even double standards in politics and not only something similar to using 5d images in cinema.
  42. Sega66
    Sega66 21 November 2015 14: 13 New
    +1
    Quote: sever.56
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/393/plwf283.png

    Better about the West and its politics than Bashar al-Assad and you will not say ... !!!
    We need coalitions, not the coalition we need. Russia,
    for more than two months, she destroyed the bandits at times
    more than the notorious “coalition” for more than a year.
    It’s not for them to dictate what we should do in this struggle and
    under what conditions to enter the coalition. We will still think:
    - Do we need this so that some NATO general
    indicated - whom to bomb and who not, and where and at what time
    fly to operations ... !!!


    Actually, there are no two more months ...
  43. Urals
    Urals 21 November 2015 14: 16 New
    +1
    We have our own effective coalition. What is your tolerant for? request We are not France, it’s enough to talk to us as on the sidelines. Russia itself will figure out its priorities and tasks. You will also be mattresses, we’ll drive pissed rags across Europe lol
  44. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 21 November 2015 14: 16 New
    +1
    It is necessary to clearly make clear to the West that they have only one right way: to be with us in a coalition, another way for them is destructive and not replenished. Because if Russia turns its back on the West as a lousy dog, then all this gang-watering will be covered a copper basin! We have excellent prospects for cooperation with other countries.
  45. barclay
    barclay 21 November 2015 14: 17 New
    +2
    Washington is ready to discuss with Russia its role in the anti-Igil coalition, provided that Moscow changes its views on the situation in Syria and ceases to support Assad
    Each of their words blows with endless arrogance and self-confidence.
    Have the US State Department still not understood that Russia’s actions in Syria do not need support and approval from Sysh?
    Most likely hegemon publishes these pompous philosophical arguments for his vassals. That, for example, kids from the Baltic states, and the like, would not be disappointed in their "teacher".
  46. rudolff
    rudolff 21 November 2015 14: 24 New
    +3
    In principle, nothing prevents Russia from declaring the creation of its own coalition: Syria, Russia, Iran (Lebanon ?, Iraq?).
  47. Alcoholic
    Alcoholic 21 November 2015 14: 28 New
    +1
    No and no trial.
    I don’t feel like waiting for friendly hugs from mattresses.
    Better the enemy than such a "friend" wassat
  48. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 21 November 2015 14: 30 New
    +1
    While the United States supports the illegitimate bloody tyrant Poroshenko and the fascist egg leader, there can be no talk of any constructive interaction with the State Department. We will proceed from our own interests. It was necessary to help Iran get out of illegal blasphemous sanctions - they helped. Need help friend Assad - help. Iraq will ask for help to combat the consequences of democratization (= IG) help. And the rest - horseradish with butter.
  49. DPN
    DPN 21 November 2015 14: 32 New
    0
    More precisely, until the United States achieves its goal, it’s not a hell of a coalition to talk about. So far, equality will not be considered with us in Russia. Russia cannot be strong as long as some live in palaces and the main population in huts, in addition, are still threatened to drive out of the same huts, or rather, only after the death of the last SOVIET MAN.
    1. 3officer
      3officer 21 November 2015 14: 59 New
      +1
      Well, there’s still time to live in the hut.) The generation of 1991 g / r will live long fellow
  50. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 21 November 2015 14: 36 New
    0
    Quote: Nevsky_ZU
    West will be adamant. And here we are?

    Well, in vain you are so, after all, politics is the ability to hide intentions behind rhetoric and to perform actions that are advantageous for ourselves, which in this case are “worse” for Westerners: they have their own policies, we have our own! We don’t really need assistants, the main thing is that they should not be confused under their feet. And American generals should command the Baltic Fleet and the Ukrainian military-industrial complex. yes