Military Review

Belarusian UAV “Busel-M” with reconnaissance and surveillance equipment may appear in the Russian Federation

44
Negotiations are currently under way on testing in Russia of the Busel-M unmanned aerial reconnaissance and surveillance complex, Yury Yatsyna, head of the Bak and Technologies Research and Production Center at the Belarusian Academy of Sciences, told Interfax-AVN.


Belarusian UAV “Busel-M” with reconnaissance and surveillance equipment may appear in the Russian Federation


“UAV complexes are not only supplied to operators in Belarus, but also to foreign customers. Negotiations on testing with UAVs in Russia are currently under way with the Russian side, ”the newspaper quoted Yatsyn as saying. MIC.

In one of the countries the assembly of complexes has already been organized.

“On the territory of the non-negotiable foreign customer, the assembly of complexes with the UAV“ Busel-M ”and“ Busel-МХNUMX ”in accordance with the licensing contracts was organized,” the interlocutor noted.

“Deliveries of complexes with UAVs“ Busel-M ”and“ Busel МХNUMX ”are carried out inside Belarus. In total, more than ten complexes were delivered this year, which is more than last year, ”he specified.

According to the information of Yatsyna, the “BLUEL-M” and “BOOSEL M50“ have a starting weight of up to 6 kg and up to 10 kg with a flight time of 50 and 90 minutes, respectively. ”
Photos used:
http://mchs.gov.by/
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimyrych
    Vladimyrych 21 November 2015 12: 01 New
    +8
    And the fig? Their manufacturers need to be promoted.
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 21 November 2015 12: 03 New
      +9
      Desirable percussion !!!
    2. venaya
      venaya 21 November 2015 12: 04 New
      32
      Cooperation, especially with Belarusians, will never hurt. But healthy competition will certainly benefit.
      1. gjv
        gjv 21 November 2015 12: 10 New
        +7
        Quote: venaya
        Cooperation, especially with Belarusians, will never hurt. But healthy competition will certainly benefit.

        Quote: Cis Ural
        Good Stork from the neighbors turned out.

        At the Dubai Airshow 2015 airshow, held in early November 2015 in Dubai, it became known that the ADCOM Systems company (UAE), developing and manufacturing unmanned aerial systems of various classes, including heavy ones, acquired a small private Belarusian company KB INDELA LLC "(Minsk) specializing in small aircraft and helicopter-type drones, the Flightglobal website reports.

        The mobile reconnaissance radar system based on the INDELA-INSKY-II helicopter UAV INDELA (Minsk) developed by KB INDELA LLC (Minsk), developed by NPO Strela OJSC (Tula, which is part of Almaz-Antey Concern JSC), in the exhibition "KB INDELA" Technologies in Mechanical Engineering - 2014 ”in Zhukovsky (c) missiles2go.ru

        KB INDELA, in particular, is a supplier of drones for Almaz-Antey Concern East Kazakhstan Joint-Stock Company, as well as for EMERCOM of Russia. The acquisition of the Belarusian company is related to the plans of ADCOM Systems to expand its presence in the mini-drones segment.
        Commenting on the entry of KB INDELA into the emirate’s company, the editor-in-chief of the UAV.RU Internet portal Denis Fedutinov told RNS that this “will allow intensifying the activities of the Arab company in the post-Soviet space, primarily in Russia.”
        He recalled that several years ago, ADCOM Systems tried to sell its United 40 MALE-class drones, as well as unmanned targets, to Russia. The previous leadership of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation was interested in these developments [in fact, information about the intentions of the Russian Ministry of Defense to acquire ADCOM Systems UAVs circulated in 2013, already under the Ministry of S. Shoigu (also see here and here) - bmpd].
        Such, damn it, cooperation. repeat
        1. Basarev
          Basarev 21 November 2015 12: 16 New
          13
          Shame and disgrace. We buy the Arab and Belarusian devices. Not a single completely Russian drone. And at the same time we consider ourselves an incredibly cool military power.
          1. Temples
            Temples 21 November 2015 13: 11 New
            17
            Previously, drones assembled in each Pioneer House.
            True, they called it all aircraft modeling.
            He collected rockets. As it is now fashionable to speak from composite materials did. Children !!!!!!!
            Damn !!!
            I think in the near future drones will only be their own.
            1. NIKNN
              NIKNN 21 November 2015 13: 34 New
              +4
              Temples (2) RU Today, 13:11

              Previously, drones assembled in each Pioneer House.
              True, they called it all aircraft modeling.


              I only collected cord models, not every mug I could afford radio-controlled, although I did rubber motors with a timer.
              And this one in the picture is 2x motor. Although the batteries are probably not enough for 2 motors. sad
              1. varov14
                varov14 21 November 2015 17: 59 New
                0
                It’s the task to create the battery you need, although I’m in the late fifties or in the beginning of the sixties in the journal “Technique of Youth” I read what was created or the atomic battery is about to be created. I don’t know where she disappeared over the years, I have already become a grandfather. And even when they created our “Buran”, it flickered that it’s possible to make an “eternal” razor from material that seems to be used as protection, but I still shave my waistcoat and then it’s two or three months old if only every other day. Something like this.
            2. Thunderbolt
              Thunderbolt 21 November 2015 13: 53 New
              +3
              How much money was allocated, how many high-profile promises there were, even some sort of UAV cluster-range was organized. And at the end ... these are negotiations with Belarus on the purchase of a small reconnaissance. And where are the promised strategic reconnaissance and strike devices of the battlefield? There are none. And there is little progress on this issue. I say in advance that there is no need to refer to super secret (that they say in one closed town ... in one secret laboratory ... such, brother, oratorios (s)). In addition, there was a number articles about our Teal. It should have similar characteristics, as he incidentally this Teal? How many Teals can be based on the Grachenka? Forgive my sarcasm, but the drummers are just what is missing in Syria now. .A UAV not only destroys the enemy. It also constrains the actions of the enemy, limits it in maneuver. If a pair of such drones hangs in a certain area, this will qualitatively change the style of warfare. Moreover, the IS is not able to deal with such equipment. Squadron of Russian "Reapers “I could do a lot of good things. But they don’t. China has already there, and we are a complete secret back door.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. mitrich
                mitrich 21 November 2015 16: 22 New
                +1
                Again, an aircraft model a la skillful hands of the pioneers, and even then foreign. Is she drawn to us? Or can’t we even fix this? You won’t be surprised even with Burkin Faso. Where are our drummers? recourse Here we are for sure, Burkin Faso.
              3. varov14
                varov14 21 November 2015 18: 11 New
                +1
                And by the way, quite recently they showed on TV what our domestic “Kulibins” are doing in aircraft modeling, this is something. Modern attack planes get up the line that, this is where the storehouse of talent is, it is also necessary to re-develop the engines and everything else in a reduced form. Take and use, all the ready-made, necessary computer software and a strike aircraft with such characteristics that a person simply can not stand.
          2. Lex.
            Lex. 21 November 2015 13: 32 New
            +3
            And Russian Belarusians buy Irkut that there is no shouting that shame and disgrace
          3. Phantom Revolution
            Phantom Revolution 21 November 2015 13: 32 New
            +2
            Quote: Basarev
            Shame and disgrace. We buy the Arab and Belarusian devices. Not a single completely Russian drone. And at the same time we consider ourselves an incredibly cool military power.

            How are the state’s coolness and drones related?
            At this point, drones are good against countries that do not have air defense. And talking about coolness is funny.
          4. Phantom Revolution
            Phantom Revolution 21 November 2015 13: 32 New
            0
            Quote: Basarev
            Shame and disgrace. We buy the Arab and Belarusian devices. Not a single completely Russian drone. And at the same time we consider ourselves an incredibly cool military power.

            How are the state’s coolness and drones related?
            At this point, drones are good against countries that do not have air defense. And talking about coolness is funny.
          5. War and Peace
            War and Peace 21 November 2015 13: 36 New
            +4
            Quote: Basarev


            Quote: Basarev
            Shame and disgrace. We buy the Arab and Belarusian devices. Not a single completely Russian drone. And at the same time we consider ourselves an incredibly cool military power.


            But the fact that Glonas satellites are American microcircuits is not a shame for you? but the fact that your TV is not ours is not a shame? But the fact that you are not using our mobile phone is not a shame? why don’t you talk about it?
            1. varov14
              varov14 21 November 2015 18: 19 New
              +1
              And we have a pipeline, here.
          6. The comment was deleted.
        2. Lex.
          Lex. 21 November 2015 13: 31 New
          +4
          Something I doubt that the Old Man agreed to the sale, albeit private, on the company's website there is nothing written about the sale
        3. varov14
          varov14 21 November 2015 17: 44 New
          0
          Is it the fight against terrorism, at the hands of terrorists?
    3. War and Peace
      War and Peace 21 November 2015 13: 31 New
      0
      Quote: Vladimir
      And the fig? Their manufacturers need to be promoted.


      so to speak, it can only be some kind of Jew, Belarusians are the same to us as Ryazans or Novgorodians, in addition to Belarus they release what they don’t do in Russia, for example, the Integral plant makes the electronics that Russian industry consumes ...
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Juborg
      Juborg 21 November 2015 15: 25 New
      +2
      It’s not clear, is this not even a product of Belarusian comrades? So now it will be called import substitution, through a number of shell countries and persons (pay everyone, by the way !!!), we will buy imports, moreover, without guarantees and service ??? And where is your production, where is the development of this defense sector?
      You did not pay attention, some questions, but no answers yet? There are devices at TNpolitech-2015, as many as 25 items, of different sizes, shapes and purposes, of domestic assembly, practically from their own components, but in fact they are not. Rather, it’s not profitable to do it yourself, they cost little, you don’t put much in your pocket. So what.
    6. svp67
      svp67 21 November 2015 15: 25 New
      0
      Quote: Vladimir
      And the fig? Their manufacturers need to be promoted.

      Of course, but to find out that others do not interfere. And here's another thing:
      “On the territory of the non-disclosed foreign customer, the assembly of complexes with the Busel-M and Busel-M50 UAVs was organized in accordance with license contracts,” the source said.
      Who is this? Kazakhstan? Venezuela? Or "country 404"? Then in general they need to be thoroughly studied
    7. Juborg
      Juborg 21 November 2015 16: 47 New
      +3
      UAV "Pear", in flight 10 hours, in service since 2011
    8. theadenter
      theadenter 21 November 2015 19: 11 New
      0
      They will not be superfluous.
  2. Basarev
    Basarev 21 November 2015 12: 03 New
    +1
    Not very happy with such news. Belarusians cover the smuggling of European concoction to Russia, invented Lithuania, flirt with the West and raise supposedly tame Nazis - and we give them such preferences, privileges and privileges. And so the land component of the nuclear triad depends on them, so now aerial reconnaissance is also there.
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 21 November 2015 12: 04 New
      +2
      Do you think they can follow in the footsteps of ancient ukrov ???
      1. Basarev
        Basarev 21 November 2015 12: 09 New
        -1
        Is it possible. What is the main principle among Belarusians? The affectionate calf of two mothers sucks. And now there is a desire of Belarus to cling to the bounties of the West. And they are generous there only in exchange for evil in relation to Russia. It is obvious!
        1. Lex.
          Lex. 21 November 2015 13: 33 New
          +2
          What generosity did they receive there?
          less media you need to listen
      2. sq
        sq 21 November 2015 18: 40 New
        0
        the more such Basarevs, the more likely
  3. Urals
    Urals 21 November 2015 12: 03 New
    +4
    Good Stork from the neighbors turned out.
  4. lopvlad
    lopvlad 21 November 2015 12: 10 New
    +4
    with a flight duration of 50 and 90 minutes

    what for they need such a flight duration.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 21 November 2015 12: 35 New
      +1
      You probably didn’t understand something ... This is not a strategic drone UAV, this is a video camera with wings and propellers, onto which our VKS attacks on ISIS are recorded, for example. In general, his purpose is to conduct tactical reconnaissance, collect data on the locations of the enemy, etc.

      It works on the principle of:
      1) Launched a drone. Found the enemy.
      2) Dolbanuli of guns
      3) Launched a drone. We look hit or still have to fuck laughing
      1. Nevsky_ZU
        Nevsky_ZU 21 November 2015 13: 06 New
        +2
        Quote: Wiruz
        You probably did not understand something ... This is not a strategic drone of the UAV, this is a video camera with wings and screws, on which our HQs on ISIS, for example, record blows.


        Take it even lower. In Syria, the Orlans-10 are working on targets in order to cover long distances, wait for the waiting time for the approach of cruise missiles, in order to give a picture of the hit for RT viewers and the Ministry of Defense channel. wink

        The same drones for intelligence units / saboteurs on the front lines and behind enemy lines. So to say, look around, reveal firing points, patrols, give the coordinates of a mortar battery, etc.
        1. Afinogen
          Afinogen 21 November 2015 13: 41 New
          +1
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          These are drones for reconnaissance / saboteur units on the front lines and behind enemy lines.


          Is it for scouts - saboteurs to carry such a suitcase? For these purposes, there are more compact devices.

  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 21 November 2015 12: 10 New
    +3
    "In the territory unclaimed foreign customer assembly of complexes with UAVs "Busel-M" and "Busel-M50" was organized in accordance with license contracts "

    And why such secrecy? Or, again, help to Ukraine, as at one time KAMAZ trucks for the war in the Donbass? I won’t be surprised.
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 21 November 2015 12: 10 New
    0
    Interesting concept. WWII microbomber. Judging by the flight time, it’s completely electric. Is that bad. In winter, in cold weather, the battery capacity drops dramatically. I don’t know how difficult it is, but personally I would do something like a “hybrid car”. And it charges itself, and if that, the power is added up, and the dependence on the low temperature is less. Well, for an airplane, an extra kilogram and a half is not such a big fee.
  7. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 21 November 2015 12: 21 New
    +1
    Well, they’ll put at least something allies in a common boiler.
    What about their manufacturers.
    Learn - will do. In the meantime, our burry managers are looking towards the Promised. So let it be better syabrs for rubles than God's chosen for dollars (we did not agree on shekels!) laughing
  8. Alex1977RUS
    Alex1977RUS 21 November 2015 12: 36 New
    0
    [quote = Basarev] Not very happy with such news. Belarusians cover the smuggling of European concoction to Russia, invented Lithuania, flirt with the West and raise supposedly tame Nazis - and we give them such preferences, privileges and privileges. And so the land component of the nuclear triad depends on them, so now aerial reconnaissance is also there.
    [Quote]
    C'mon, all these radio-controlled crafts with direct control,
    for military purposes, all the same, only the Papuans drive.
    Broadband interference for him by striking a wire on the terminal of the cargo battery can be put))).
    I exaggerate slightly, but the power of the transceiver equipment on such devices is negligible, to drown out with a bang. Let the Belarusians have fun. Such an airplane in the club of young technicians can be made by purchasing at the nearest radio market. Or buy in an aircraft model store.
    The phrase that has already gotten sore - EW funds.
    It is necessary to make heavy drones at home, which a priori, constructively can work independently, in conditions of strong electronic countermeasures. This is complicated. Expensive. But it is necessary.
    But this pampering is one thing.
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 21 November 2015 13: 01 New
      +2
      But this pampering is one thing.


      Do not want to continue? For example, like this:
      But this pampering is one thing. For example, a model created in our brownie(yard, street, district, city) sharashke (team, company):
      1. NIKNN
        NIKNN 21 November 2015 13: 43 New
        +3
        yuriy55 SU today

        Do not want to continue? For example, like this:
        But this pampering is one thing. For example, a model created in our brownie (yard, street, district, city) sharashka (team, company):


        You have a serious sharazhka. lol
  9. lilian
    lilian 21 November 2015 12: 49 New
    +2
    I am generally surprised by these toys. What is so special about them? Those. probably something special, but there are also models of aircraft that anyone can buy or assemble from components. and on these models you can stick a webcam, which are now miniature and also available.
  10. yuriy55
    yuriy55 21 November 2015 12: 53 New
    +1
    This news is more pleasant than problematic. Correct and constructive cooperation will bring more success than isolation and ordeal alone. So what about the fact that Russia has few partners left in matters of creating military equipment? And, besides, these are our Slav brothers ... yes
  11. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 21 November 2015 13: 46 New
    -1
    We need to learn from the United States - if a sample is suitable for the US Army, then the manufacturer must produce this sample in the USA and transfer the license. And then the Old Man will then be clever about the unique products of Belarus. And so let them sell on the open market at market prices and conditions.
  12. tinibar
    tinibar 21 November 2015 15: 26 New
    +3
    Quote: Temples
    Previously, drones assembled in each Pioneer House.
    True, they called it all aircraft modeling.
    He collected rockets. As it is now fashionable to speak from composite materials did. Children !!!!!!!
    Damn !!!
    I think in the near future drones will only be their own.

    I live in Tula. In the Tula region there is the city of Aleksin. And only about three years ago I learned that there is a circle of aircraft modeling, where they themselves produce the BEST engines in the world for aircraft models! That's who needs to be involved in the development of UAVs!
  13. Alex1977RUS
    Alex1977RUS 21 November 2015 15: 33 New
    0
    Quote: yuriy55
    But this pampering is one thing.


    Do not want to continue? For example, like this:
    But this pampering is one thing. For example, a model created in our brownie(yard, street, district, city) sharashke (team, company):

    Is that about him, right?
    http://habrahabr.ru/post/135150/
    and this?
    http://topwar.ru/41496-krymchane-perehvatili-amerikanskiy-udarnyy-bespilotnik.ht
    ml
    and this?
    http://inosmi.ru/asia/20091217/157058369.html
    And this is a cherry on the cake.

    http://www.podavitel.ru/kak-sdelat-gps-glushilki.html
    should I continue ?
    1. mav1971
      mav1971 21 November 2015 17: 34 New
      +1
      Quote: Alex1977RUS

      should I continue ?


      Do not be.
      All the same, most people don’t understand that the complexes of the Autobase in the Russian Army are simply units.
      And he will not be able to control all possible directions in the event of a conflict.

      And all the more so since the Avtobaza, by itself, cannot disrupt the connection of the UAV with the satellite, other complexes are needed for this. you need to know this too.
      When you know this, you don’t feel like doing capriciousness at all.
  14. Klopomor
    Klopomor 21 November 2015 17: 31 New
    +6
    Hooray we made an airplane! Hooray we are cool! What kind of production they are talking about. Russia and Belarus do not produce BC motors, LiPo batteries, Naza, mini cameras, or FPV equipment. Sharazhkin offices are assembled by Chinese designers and evaporated for a lot of money to security officials and other government agencies. View VO material from Interpolitech exhibition. Take a look at the sites of these "manufacturers." Become a shame for the country.
  15. Alex1977RUS
    Alex1977RUS 22 November 2015 10: 57 New
    0
    Quote: mav1971
    Quote: Alex1977RUS

    should I continue ?


    Do not be.
    All the same, most people don’t understand that the complexes of the Autobase in the Russian Army are simply units.
    And he will not be able to control all possible directions in the event of a conflict.

    And all the more so since the Avtobaza, by itself, cannot disrupt the connection of the UAV with the satellite, other complexes are needed for this. you need to know this too.
    When you know this, you don’t feel like doing capriciousness at all.

    And what does the Automobile Base have to do with it? And satellites ...
    Have you studied the performance characteristics of the products under discussion?
    In this Stork M of yours, the claimed communication range of 25 km in the open, is reached via satellite?
    Or through a weak transmitter, with a maximum power of eight watts?
    Learn the subject matter of the discussion.
    I'm not saying that in the event of a collision of the Russian Federation vs USA there will be no satellites.
    But this is particular.
    Now we are talking about “tactical” products, for which jamming the control channels which do not need “Carpool”.
    A handy, large garbage radio amateur is enough as a source of spare parts and a heated nail instead of a soldering iron.
  16. Alex1977RUS
    Alex1977RUS 22 November 2015 11: 36 New
    0
    In order to definitively put more precisely over I in this discussion, since I have not clearly expressed my thought ...
    My post No. 1 - “tactical” drones controlled via a “ground” radio channel, T.E. I’ll come in a capsule for better perception - CONTROLLED without the help of SATELLITES, directly from a ground post, STRUCTURALLY NOT ABLE TO WORK IN OFFLINE MODE, as a matter of fact - REMOTE CONTROL TELECAMERA and transceiver equipment of increased power, relative to store ones - pampering, for military purposes only Papuans are suitable to drive. For the control and information transmission channels are jammed at times with the help of primitive and cheap means of jamming. NOT "AUTOBASES".
    The ham radio solder on his knee.
    Their practical construction does not bear any practical value. This is a Chinese aircraft model, in which batteries are inserted more powerful, and the transmitter is more powerful. Club Young Technician.
    To make it even clearer, you can use civilian mobile phones to correct artillery fire only as long as civilian base stations work, and the enemy does not start jamming civilian frequencies. It works against Georgia.
    Against any decent army - no.
    It is necessary to develop and produce for ourselves that which can fight against the army, and not a chorus of songs and dances, or a Papuan with a rusty Kalash and a spear in the other hand. Medium-heavy UAVs capable of operating in the conditions of electronic countermeasures. Produce, apply, accumulate experience in use.
    Is it clear ?
    You began to sculpt pictures with heavy shock UAVs.
    It is those that I was talking about. As an answer, several links to how serious machines made for war are broken, just to illustrate the vulnerability of children's crafts.
    Some satellites, the number of depots in the Russian army, and so on.
    And I'm not talking about the complete futility. They are useless for the army, but needed on a civilian.
    So, Belarusians do not fuck them, there is nothing wrong with that. On the contrary.