Military Review

UVZ: The T-14 Armata gun has increased strength and a high degree of survivability

44
The press service of Uralvagonzavod reports that the developer of a 125-mm gun for tank T-14 "Armata" with the help of special technology increased the wear resistance of the gun. The technology consists in applying a special polymetallic protective coating to the bore. Information Agency TASS gives the text of the statement of the representative of the press service of the defense enterprise:


The 9-mm tank gun 125А2-82М created by JSC “Plant 1” was installed on the Armata tank.


UVZ: The T-14 Armata gun has increased strength and a high degree of survivability


According to some reports, the use of a special protective layer in the barrel has improved the accuracy of the firing.

On the eve of the "Uralvagonzavod" reported that in the near future the troops will be transferred 20 tanks T-14 "Armata", who managed to pass the required tests.

From the presentation material "UVZ" on T-14 "Armata":

The machine used unprecedented design solutions, in particular, the tower T-14 uninhabited. For the first time in the world, the crew is placed in an armored capsule, separated from the ammunition. This measure allows tankers to stay alive even with a direct hit in the tower and fire ammunition.

The tank is equipped with active and dynamic protection, equipped with a remotely controlled combat module with a powerful gun and automatic reloading system. Along the perimeter of the tower and the hull installed opto-electronic devices for monitoring, aiming and detecting threats.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Aleks tv
    Aleks tv 19 November 2015 14: 48 New
    14
    Good luck to the "Nine".)))
    Sincerely.

    The guys have a very difficult task - to arrange the MASS production of new trunks of the 2A82 family, and even remember about 2A46M-5.
    wink
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 19 November 2015 14: 54 New
      +1
      As I understand it, the 152 mm gun on the T 14 will not. They have already fully invested in 125 mm. There are probably some nuances. request
      1. Sharapov
        Sharapov 19 November 2015 15: 07 New
        13
        And if it does, it will be another car. Remember the difference between T-34-76 and T-34-85.
      2. RBLip
        RBLip 19 November 2015 15: 09 New
        11
        Quote: keel 31
        As I understand it, there will be no 152 mm gun on the T 14.

        as the main one - no. as a heavy percussion - will be. "Bulletin of Mordovia" for 17.09.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX
      3. Aleks tv
        Aleks tv 19 November 2015 15: 14 New
        17
        Quote: Kil 31
        As I understand it, the 152 mm gun on the T 14 will not. They have already fully invested in 125 mm. There are probably some nuances. request

        Igor, 125mm still has a very HEALY touch on the possibilities.
        In this caliber still poking around and poking around)))
        Plus, interchangeability has not yet been canceled.

        And according to 152mm ... it’s no secret that there are such achievements. And if the Party and the State Academic Bolshoi Technical University say - it should, then it will be.
        wink

        The 292 facility in Kubinka.
        Photo by Roman Banshee.
        1. Engineer
          Engineer 19 November 2015 15: 25 New
          15
          I'll tell you even more: on this tank it was with an automatic loader
          1. Albert1988
            Albert1988 19 November 2015 22: 11 New
            +1
            Quote: Engineer
            I'll tell you even more: on this tank it was with an automatic loader

            Well, it's understandable - "this tank" somehow also has an uninhabited tower, like the T-14, but in general the installation of 152mm on the armature is more a matter of availability of funds, since the gun (2A83) is already there, an uninhabited module with such a gun has already been run in (Object 195), and the Ministry of Defense has already announced. that there is such an opportunity ...
    2. Tor5
      Tor5 19 November 2015 16: 37 New
      0
      Release, release and release!
      1. samoletil18
        samoletil18 19 November 2015 16: 49 New
        0
        Quote: Tor5
        Release, release and release!

        And what about the production of ammunition?
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 19 November 2015 16: 56 New
          11
          And with the production of new ammunition, we are starting to get better - here is a new 125 mm shaped-charge projectile with a triple warhead, to overcome the double dynamic protection of the "Relic" type.
  2. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 19 November 2015 14: 50 New
    +6
    Uralvagonzavod was informed that in the near future 20 T-14 Armata tanks, which managed to pass the required tests, will be transferred to the troops.

    Well done guys ..! Now it's the 41st year ... The delay in death is like that!
    1. Altona
      Altona 19 November 2015 15: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Well done guys ..! Now it's the 41st year ... The delay in death is like that!

      ------------------------
      Do not worry, the T-90 is also not a gift ..
      1. tank64rus
        tank64rus 19 November 2015 15: 29 New
        +5
        The T-90 is in no way inferior to Leopard or Abrams, no matter how the liberals scream. And then there's Armata. There will be something to think about over the hill. Do not wake a bear can hurt.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 19 November 2015 17: 28 New
          +3
          Quote: tank64rus
          The T-90 is in no way inferior to Leopard or Abrams, no matter how the liberals scream. And then there's Armata. There will be something to think about over the hill. Do not wake a bear can hurt.

          10 t-000 (of which there are also upgraded to version B72), and 3 T-3500, about 80 more T-700 ... that’s exactly what is not inferior to anyone wink
      2. tank64rus
        tank64rus 19 November 2015 15: 29 New
        0
        The T-90 is in no way inferior to Leopard or Abrams, no matter how the liberals scream. And then there's Armata. There will be something to think about over the hill. Do not wake a bear can hurt.
  3. KAPITANUS
    KAPITANUS 19 November 2015 14: 50 New
    +5
    The Red Army is the strongest!
    1. AUL
      AUL 19 November 2015 16: 04 New
      +4
      The thought is fresh, unexpected and well-reasoned. No wonder I gathered the pluses!
      Continue in the same spirit.
  4. Baikonur
    Baikonur 19 November 2015 14: 51 New
    +1
    What about the 152 mm gun? Will or will not do? Something silent!
    1. Nik_One
      Nik_One 19 November 2015 14: 59 New
      +9
      The main thing is that there is an opportunity to establish, but the rest of the time will show.)) It is better to do silently than to speak.)))
    2. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 19 November 2015 15: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Baikonur
      What about the 152 mm gun? Will or will not do? Something silent!


      Once the ammunition is done, of course, and the gun will be. While the first batch will be rolled around, they will bring it to mind, the gun will arrive in time. And the tank, by the way, looks modest in comparison. But the bourgeoisie was pretty concussed.
      1. Altona
        Altona 19 November 2015 15: 17 New
        +8
        Quote: iliitch
        And the tank, by the way, looks modest in comparison.

        -----------------------
        The Su-24 also looks modest, but the evil stuff is just rattling ...
      2. goose
        goose 19 November 2015 16: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: iliitch
        Once the ammunition is done, of course, and the gun will be. While the first batch will be rolled around, they will bring it to mind, the gun will arrive in time. And the tank, by the way, looks modest in comparison. But the bourgeoisie was pretty concussed.

        This is the trick, in the ammunition, when they recognize the price tag for providing the army with a new nomenclature, they immediately reverse.
  5. Magic archer
    Magic archer 19 November 2015 14: 52 New
    +1
    The main thing is that the car is reliable. I think everything, but what if God forbid the breakdown of the automatic loader ?! The tower is not inhabited. That is, there is no possibility of manual loading ....
    1. Albert1988
      Albert1988 19 November 2015 20: 59 New
      +2
      Quote: Magic Archer
      That is, there is no possibility of manual loading ....

      You won’t believe it - but in the old T-72/80/90 it is also virtually absent, although the towers are inhabited ...
  6. igor1981
    igor1981 19 November 2015 14: 53 New
    +5
    As the saying goes - "there are no limits to perfection." This is me about the fact that before putting the tank into production, you need to speculate everything, finish it, so that later you don't have to redo everything and send it for modernization.
  7. Wild_grey_wolf
    Wild_grey_wolf 19 November 2015 14: 55 New
    +5
    Improvements are taking place in the eyes of CONTEMPORARIES, I won’t be surprised if in a couple of years the appearance of the tank changes dramatically. Moreover, everything will become more compact and powerful.
    1. serverny
      serverny 19 November 2015 15: 43 New
      +1
      Yes, with such a modular design, God himself ordered to make different combat modules. In the future, I expect both heavy assault vehicles with 152mm turrets and a BMPT-like configuration of weapons.
  8. chikenous59
    chikenous59 19 November 2015 14: 59 New
    +8
    Quote: Wild_Grey_Wolf
    Improvements are taking place in the eyes of CONTEMPORARIES, I won’t be surprised if in a couple of years the appearance of the tank changes dramatically. Moreover, everything will become more compact and powerful.

    I immediately remember a small pistol from the movie "Men in Black"))
  9. Taranchello
    Taranchello 19 November 2015 15: 04 New
    +2
    They would have quickly brought to mind the troops, but more ...
  10. Engineer
    Engineer 19 November 2015 15: 10 New
    +6
    I look at the tower of the tank and the idea that it was calculated under a 152mm gun is gaining more and more) I would rather show the tank in this version.
    1. ratfly
      ratfly 19 November 2015 15: 54 New
      +5
      By the way, yes. A big tower for the uninhabited. I imagined another option.
      1. A.Lex
        A.Lex 19 November 2015 16: 03 New
        +1
        T14m2 - a night ghost?
        1. AUL
          AUL 19 November 2015 16: 14 New
          +2
          So this is not a tower, but a casing! There are so many pribluds placed under it - be healthy. And the gun carriage itself does not take up much space. Yesterday (if I am not mistaken) there was a post on the site in which this casing was "undressed" - I advise you to look.
      2. Homo
        Homo 19 November 2015 16: 13 New
        +1
        What kind of ammunition does this pepelats have and where is it located?
  11. Oleg1080
    Oleg1080 19 November 2015 15: 10 New
    +3
    Trunks do not need to be cleaned.
    Shells with "brush plumage" laughing
  12. ydjin
    ydjin 19 November 2015 15: 17 New
    +2
    Now it’s faster to run on military tests and taking into account the comments in a series!
  13. katalonec2014
    katalonec2014 19 November 2015 15: 19 New
    +2
    Today I looked at the website of one store, he sells volumetric bench models, I learned with interest that they had delivered the second batch of "Armat", because for the first time everyone did not get it. something simpler, but not like the T-90 ... 1300 parts, but you don't want to take the "Star" either, can anyone advise the manufacturer's firm.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 19 November 2015 16: 17 New
      +4
      I recommend TRUMPETER or MODELCOLLECT.
    2. 52
      52 19 November 2015 16: 30 New
      +3
      TRUMPETER, although it is not a sin to star with Star. Price is a determining factor.
  14. S-cream
    S-cream 19 November 2015 15: 38 New
    +2
    I wonder why the tank one hatch leans to the side on the hinges, and the second sliding?
    Sliding is done so that the trunk does not interfere with the hatch opening, but on Armata it is movable, sort of, even further from the trunk, and leans back closer to the trunk. What's the point, interesting ...
  15. serverny
    serverny 19 November 2015 15: 41 New
    +3
    Quote: Kil 31
    As I understand it, the 152 mm gun on the T 14 will not. They have already fully invested in 125 mm. There are probably some nuances. request

    The main "nuance" is that at the moment 152mm on the tank are not particularly in demand, especially against the background of the disadvantages of the existing 152mm guns.
    Plus MO is quite negative about the inevitable reduction of ammunition, in the absence of real need - because all existing tanks of a potential enemy are already affected from 2A82-1M.

    A new large-caliber tank gun is under development, but I would not expect big news on this topic in the coming years.
  16. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 19 November 2015 15: 53 New
    +6
    Video for discussion ... It is interesting to read specialists! hi
    1. Magic archer
      Magic archer 19 November 2015 16: 48 New
      +1
      Journalists, as always, were unpleasantly surprised by their incompetence. They talk about Armata, and in the video they show the T-90СМ! Once they just showed it briefly during the shot.
  17. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 19 November 2015 16: 09 New
    +1
    This is "over-destruction". Why take a gun of the next caliber, develop special ammunition for it - after all, there was no smoothbore of this caliber yet. The entire line, including guided missiles, ammunition reduction.
    IMHO, I think that 122 mm on the IS-2 was not a very good decision due to the low rate of fire. Although he killed any of the fascist "Menagerie" from the first round, he was not given the second shot. And here - such a "fly swatter", from the first shot killing any tank of a potential enemy, but the ammunition carried - less, misses - no one canceled, and the enemy, as against IS, will order to work only from ambushes.
  18. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 19 November 2015 16: 12 New
    +2
    Quote: ratfly
    By the way, yes. A big tower for the uninhabited. I imagined another option.

    An absolutely non-viable combat module is drawn, in addition to the barrels, shells must also be placed somewhere, an automatic loader, guidance and suppression systems.
  19. staryivoin
    staryivoin 19 November 2015 16: 21 New
    +1
    Armata to the troops. ... And I would very much like to see her at field tests. Or the "work" of a cannon on tank armor ..
  20. Cympak
    Cympak 20 November 2015 00: 02 New
    0
    Ammunition rarely explodes. Usually, when a tank is damaged, the hydraulic fluid of the drive of the gun ignites and the deflagration of propellant charges occurs.
    Syria example at 1:04: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=k3pFl8edl0I
  21. Welcome to hell
    Welcome to hell 20 November 2015 13: 48 New
    0
    Quote: Kil 31
    As I understand it, the 152 mm gun on the T 14 will not. They have already fully invested in 125 mm. There are probably some nuances. request

    it will be, but later, 125mm is more profitable in terms of the number of shells transported and found in the AZ and in terms of efficiency, because we have 125 is the main caliber for MBT and we have a bunch of ammunition for it.