Submarines for the Black Sea Fleet will be built at the Admiralty Shipyards

Interfax reports that a new submarine B-237 Rostov-on-Don was laid down at the Admiralty Shipyards in St. Petersburg under project 636.3 Varshavyanka. This ship will be transferred to the Black Sea the fleet Of Russia. The Admiralty Shipyards will build a total of six submarines under project 636.3 according to the contract with the Russian Ministry of Defense, signed on September 5, 2011. All ships will be built by 2016 and will also be transferred to the Black Sea Fleet.

In addition, "Admiralty Shipyards" are building the first submarine B-261 "Novorossiysk" on the revised project 636. The customer will receive this ship in 2013. Until the end of 2014, two more such submarines should be built. The design of submarines for the Black Sea Fleet has received a number of changes that take into account the conditions of their operation on the Black Sea.

The renewal of the Black Sea Fleet is carried out within the framework of the Russian state armaments program 2011-2020. The amount of funding will be 23 trillion rubles. It is planned that in the fleet the number of modern ships to 2030 year will be 35-40 units. In particular, Sevastopol will supply six Varshavyanka submarines of the 636.3 project, six frigates (the 11356 (1135.6) project), corvettes of the 20385 project, as well as about ten small artillery and small rocket ships.

Comments

[Sergh]

A good boat "Varshavyanka", if the modernization is carried out conscientiously, then it will probably be completely silent !? What she pleased, but on the contrary frightened someone.

[redmont]

Before that there was an article about the state of the Black Sea Fleet ... I really think that a good boat)

[PLO]

it is still unclear why project 636 "varshavyanka" and not project 677 "lada"?

can anyone know the reasons?

[Kyrgyz]

apparently for shallow water is better Warsaw, and probably cheaper

[Foamas]

Presumably - the endless problems of the GEM (also with the HAC and avionics).
On the boats of this series, it was envisaged to embody the principle of full electric propulsion with a single all-mode electric motor.
That’s the thing that’s stuck with it, the new main electric motor SED-1.0 (brushless low-speed with permanent magnet excitation) with a digital control system - to work according to standard characteristics not willing (since 2005) gives 50%
(for orientation on pr.636 - 4 different electric motors, for different types of movement).
As a result, at the beginning of 2009 the construction of all boats was stopped. (+ money ran out).

The photo shows the stern part of the second boat pr.677 "Kronstadt" 03.11.11.

[tullamore]

I’ll say right away that I’m not an expert in the field of shipbuilding, but I read a lot ... why is project 636 and not 677, judging by many articles 677, the project is still very, very "raw", only one boat "St. Petersburg" was built and then they built it for many years and until the end, the setup process has not been completed .. apparently they decided to bet on a more developed project, only by modernizing it, the process is already quite well developed and established, which will undoubtedly affect both the price and the speed of construction ...

[desava]

Maybe because "Warsaw" is checked?

[tullamore]

therefore, too .... tested both in the lying market and in the external (export) ... although according to the press, at the moment, 2 boats of project 677 should be built at the moment ... but I really can’t say how things are. ....

[Vadivak]

Quote: Sergh

Nice boat "Varshavyanka",

less noisy than atomic ones are much cheaper.
"The US specialists immediately appreciated the merits of our submarine, - They drew attention to the fact that with its appearance, American submarines lost the advantage in noiselessness that they had for many years, and one of the American magazines called" Kilo "(so" Varshavyanka " dubbed NATO) "a black hole in the ocean" hinting at the complexity of its detection by means of hydroacoustics ... "

And so it can be transported

Cypriot ship Si Ten with a Russian submarine on board, heading towards China. The submarine itself is of the "Kilo" class (in NATO terminology), built at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur shipyard. And it is the first of four that the Chinese Navy intends to partially replace their Ming submarines, developed back in 1971. However, in 1990, Chinese designers presented the Song model, an alternative to this Russian model and approximately corresponding to it in terms of characteristics, and in May 1994, the first sample was already launched.

[Foamas]

Vadivak, if you want to show how to transport the boats of this project, just put normal photos (and not this pornography).
In the photo, the sending of two boats pr.877EKM / 636 from St. Petersburg to China (May 2006), the vessel Tai An Kou.

[Russian sniper]

It is necessary for more ships especially shock)) And then the Turkish fleet is already in earnest roaming around in Black))

[Pavel V]

Great news. More ships are good, new and different.

[Anatoliy]

It is reliable that the submarines of this series will not be durable.

[Alexei]

Build, build soon - the enemy is almost at the gates and will not wait ... But we were broken off with aircraft carriers

[desava]

Specialists !!! Anybody! Help clarify the classification of NK! I got confused, to the devil: and corvettes, and frigates, and MRK, and MPK, and BOD, and destroyers ... Further, I don’t swing at large ships. What are the criteria for belonging to a particular class of ships, and in the end, what classes of ships in our fleet currently exist, according to all the governing and not very documents. Thank you in advance.

[PLO]

the most important criteria are the displacement and the tasks that are set before the ship.

[desava]

This is clear. I mean the current classification of the Tax Code at the moment according to all documents. And the criteria for distinguishing the destroyer from the frigate, and the RTOs from the corvette ...

[linen]

desava, take 2 volumes of VD Dotsenko * History of naval art *, t.1_ * weapons and theory *. Criteria for weapons. After modernization, ships can change the classification.

[PSih2097]

desava,
In the Soviet Navy, the corvette class did not stand out ... However, from the standpoint of the Soviet and Russian classification, the corvette class corresponds to the patrol ship class.
The frigate, in theory, was supposed to replace the destroyers and the BOD.

In the Soviet and Russian fleets, ships of this type were simply called anti-submarine and patrol ships, depending on their destination, cruising range and armament. However, in connection with changes in military doctrine, a kind of “creeping” reclassification is currently taking place in the Navy, especially in relation to new classes.

[desava]

Thank you And this despite the fact that I finished korfak ... ashamed !!! Well yes,! oh well, whatever you call it, it will be so. Project 956 is now a frigate, and RTOs
Project 1234 - Corvette? The trouble, of course ... or the guard ...
Something I lagged behind modern ships, they are so many and quickly build that we do not have time to determine them in a certain class! WITH

[KuigoroZHIK]

urrrrraaaaaaaaaaa! New warships will come to Sevastopol !!!!!!!! I will meet with flowers !!!!!!!!!

[AlievMR]

The news is good, especially considering the fact that the Yankees began to drop in more often to us on the Black Sea. Very glad of ours. Keep it up!

[Dock]

There will be something to "force the Pindos to the world."

[Victor]

Really good and very encouraging news. Turks should not feel like masters of our sea.

[dobrik10]

The fact that the strengthening of the Black Sea fleet will keep the ardor of Turkey is by itself, but amers will also make it clear that even visiting Georgia their fleet will feel at ease.
If only "Admeralteiskie Verfi" did not pump up and fulfilled the contract on time and with proper quality.

[Nick]

Not a fleet specialist. Tell me, what tasks does this submarine solve?

[PN]

Protection of naval bases, escort of ships for various purposes, search and destruction of enemy ships, sabotage tasks.

[Nick]

Thank! Crimp PN.

[desava]

In general, I agree. But attacking operations, including disruption of communications. The same as in the second world ...
And the rest I agree with PN.

[dobrik10]

The main thing is that submarines of this class are quite small-sized and are perfectly suited for marine areas

[desava]

The lower the displacement and the area of ​​the wetted surface, the higher the secrecy. Not taking into account, of course, the propeller and engine. The latter are one of the main sources of noise on submarines. For whom of you is the word "cavitation" familiar?

[Sobibor]

Not signing an agreement to replace the old composition with a new one is nothing more than window dressing. Think before the election

[desava]

What the devil composition? Do you mean the crew?

[Filin]

desava
Who of you is familiar with the word "cavitation

This word is known).
This principle is used in the "SHKVAL" torpedo and the "BARRAKUDA" torpedo (according to the Germans). And also the movement of a bullet in the water from the APS is based on this principle.
Cavitation destroys the surface of propellers, acoustic emitters ....

"Moving with the flow to a region with a higher pressure or during the half-period of compression, the cavitation bubble collapses, while emitting a shock wave." YOU ABOUT THIS EFFECT ??

[4lexey]

Until 2020, a lot of money was allocated for rearmament. So you need to spend them wisely.