Work on the creation of the wheel and tracked versions of the "Coalition" are carried out simultaneously

21
TsNII "Burevestnik" (part of the UVZ) is developing a wheeled version of the self-propelled howitzer "Coalition-SV" on a single schedule with a tracked option, reports MIC with reference to the press service of "Uralvagonzavod."



“The work on the wheeled variant goes simultaneously with the work on the tracked self-propelled artillery gun, according to a single schedule with it,” the release says.

At present, tests of prototypes are underway.

“The issue of adopting the“ Coalition-SV ”self-propelled artillery gun will be decided by the general customer after the completion of state tests of prototypes and the assignment of documentation,“ O1 ”,” the corporation specified.

If necessary, the Coalition cannon can be mounted on the Armata platform.

“The modular principle of constructing the artillery part of the Coalition-SV self-propelled artillery gun allows it to be adapted to the Armat’s promising heavy tracked platform,” the press service noted.

The company explained that such work "can be carried out under an additional contract with the general customer."

According to the developers, “the Russian 152-mm self-propelled howitzer of the 2C35 Coalition-SV brigade unit is designed to destroy tactical nuclear weapons, artillery and mortar batteries, tanks and other armored vehicles, anti-tank weapons, manpower, air defense and missile defense systems, command posts. "

Earlier it was reported that the "Coalition-SV" will begin to enter the troops from 2019,
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    17 November 2015 08: 36
    Well, with God, advertising is good, but there is still a lot of work.
    1. +7
      17 November 2015 08: 46
      If necessary, the Coalition cannon can be mounted on the Armata platform.


      I won’t take THIS in tol request ...

      Indeed, according to its ideology, the ACS "Coalition SV" was developed as a turret-mounted vehicle with an extended ammunition load, with the crew located outside the fighting compartment, which, in fact, implies the use of the Armata platform ...

      Maybe an article "with a beard", and it tells about the design stage when the concept of the ACS itself was developed? Then, if so, everything becomes clear ...
  2. +13
    17 November 2015 08: 38
    That was a cool idea:



    1. +7
      17 November 2015 08: 42
      Once refused, there were probably reasons. Perhaps the launch volley could not stand it.
      1. +5
        17 November 2015 08: 49
        Quote: Angro Magno
        Once refused, there were probably reasons. Perhaps the launch volley could not stand it.


        They say that a complex, "painfully tricky" automatic loader for a "double-barreled", the reason for refusing such work ...
        1. 0
          17 November 2015 14: 41
          There is an option to install this double-barreled self-propelled guns on corvettes
      2. +3
        17 November 2015 10: 15
        The problem was not in the salvo, but in the reliability of the loading mechanism and the accuracy of the second shot. It took a while for the ACS to be in a "rest" state for an accurate second salvo. the gain in time compared to one barrel was insignificant. We decided to rely on reliability, as a result, a single-barreled version.
  3. -1
    17 November 2015 08: 40
    The coalition is wonderful.
    And under 122 mm will not produce new products? Or is there no place for this caliber in battle? Who can enlighten?
    1. +2
      17 November 2015 09: 01
      It seems like CAO 2C34 "Host" is being released instead of "Carnations" ...
      1. 0
        17 November 2015 09: 18
        Thanks, I will look for info.
      2. 0
        17 November 2015 10: 26
        Quote: uav80
        It seems like CAO 2C34 "Host" is being released instead of "Carnations" ...

        They refused it, did not give out the declared characteristics .. They look at the "Vienna" but expensive ...
  4. +1
    17 November 2015 08: 50
    That is why in the states all official Pentagon talkers and "analysts" have wrinkled turnips in the morning at briefings - in the evening they know that in the morning our military-industrial complex will be puzzled by another novelty, how can we not get drunk?
  5. +6
    17 November 2015 09: 02
    Read . that the double-barreled version is too complicated. and provided that the first shots of the single-barrel variant come with a short period of time, and is impractical. Type two three shells, one after another overlaps the complexity of the design and its reliability. But the wheel drive, in principle, increases mobility and speed on hard roads, which is not bad. And the reliability of the wheeled chassis is higher than the tracked one, and fuel consumption is lower. Personally, I think that you can always find a place in the troops, and both. Good luck to them.
  6. +1
    17 November 2015 09: 31
    All sorts of guns are needed .. All sorts of guns are important .. Guns are not toys .. We are for the guns ... God help our designers ..! PS .. It’s not bad that there were (smart) shells for them.! soldier
  7. +1
    17 November 2015 09: 37

    Interesting machine. It’s interesting to watch the shooting. And direct-fire is also interesting how this monster is pounding.
  8. +1
    17 November 2015 09: 46
    IMHO the wheeled version is good only on the march, but when it comes to - "volley and change of position ..." here the tracked chassis will teach the wheeled one. And as far as I know, the current option for the time of shooting five shells is not inferior to the double-barreled one, namely, such a volley of five shells is done, after which there is an immediate change of position, even before the last shell reaches the target. The "coalition" shown above fits perfectly into this standard, so why complicate it ...
    1. +4
      17 November 2015 09: 56
      Quote: Benya krik
      The "coalition" shown above fits perfectly into this standard, so why complicate it ...


      Perhaps the wheeled version will be of interest to foreign buyers, those whose traditionally wheeled systems are in service?
  9. +1
    17 November 2015 10: 00
    Quote: DEZINTO
    That was a cool idea:



    By the way, they are now testing a double-barreled shotgun based on a new gun, and as they themselves say, this is only experimental work. In general, if necessary, such a karamultuk will be made quickly.
  10. +1
    17 November 2015 11: 09
    is developing a wheeled version of the Coalition-SV self-propelled howitzer

    Practice shows that wheeled versions of such and similar equipment are developed for desert terrain. So with the prospect of selling in BV countries?
    1. +2
      17 November 2015 12: 18
      In Europe, wheeled self-propelled guns are also widespread due to the developed road network.
      Here's an example of a Swedish Archer:


      Or the Czechoslovak Dana:
  11. +1
    17 November 2015 12: 08
    But how much is not, the caliber 152 mm is very widespread and the price on a wheelbase, as well as the content is several times lower.
  12. 0
    17 November 2015 14: 08
    155 mm CAESAR self-propelled guns must be made like this Maximum firing range by an active rocket - 42 km
  13. 0
    17 November 2015 15: 17
    Quote: Zaurbek
    But how much is not, the caliber 152 mm is very widespread and the price on a wheelbase, as well as the content is several times lower.


    hmm, but where does such data come from "at times"?
    may be "much less", but not at all several times (since this is the minimum "myself + myself", i.e. an increase of 200% is an increase of 1 times, in other words, if they write: "increased by 3,4 times", then this is 340% ...)

    maybe I'm wrong, but I don’t think that the operation of the wheeled chassis will be much less. If not right, correct.
  14. 0
    17 November 2015 17: 26
    Quote: Gomel
    Quote: Zaurbek
    But how much is not, the caliber 152 mm is very widespread and the price on a wheelbase, as well as the content is several times lower.


    hmm, but where does such data come from "at times"?
    may be "much less", but not at all several times (since this is the minimum "myself + myself", i.e. an increase of 200% is an increase of 1 times, in other words, if they write: "increased by 3,4 times", then this is 340% ...)

    maybe I'm wrong, but I don’t think that the operation of the wheeled chassis will be much less. If not right, correct.

    If we consider the entire service life, including the mileage to overhaul is several times higher for tractors, but it’s 4-5 times, but the tasks available to tracked vehicles are often not accessible to wheeled vehicles, and they can replace a tracked ones, death is slower and more expensive than road surfaces under the damnation of mechanics
    In the middle lane outside urban conditions in the north, in the snow in the taiga, only caterpillars are in the wet plowland, only on foot in the swamps, wheels in the settlements on the knurling and in parades, or an ATV but he will only take a couple of shells for this gun)))