The contract for the supply of C-300 air defense systems to Iran came into force

It became known yesterday that the contract for the supply of C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran has entered into force. Recall that at one time Russia supported the anti-Iran sanctions (2010 year), deciding to suspend the implementation of the contract for the supply of air defense missile systems, although the complexes to the offensive weapons (namely, it was mentioned in the relevant resolution) had no relation. Iran then filed a claim with the Geneva Arbitration Court for almost 4 billion dollars.

Now, according to the head of Rostec, Sergey Chemezov, Iran will drop its claims. To do this, Russia must fully implement the first part of the contract, completing the delivery of the first batch of C-300 air defense missile systems. It is reported by the news agency TASS.

At the same time, Sergey Chemezov did not specify information about exactly which modifications will be supplied by Russia to the Iranian side.

Recall that Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree authorizing the supply of C-300 air defense systems to Iran, 13 in April of this year. This happened after the statement of the so-called "six" (group of representatives on the study of the Iranian issue) in Lausanne that had made significant progress in discussing the Iranian nuclear program.

Comments

[VseDoFeNi]

Will Iran have the opportunity to establish a no-fly zone on the Persian Gulf?

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: VseDoFeNi

Will Iran have the opportunity to establish a no-fly zone on the Persian Gulf?

And to answer America's boorish behavior (see previous news). Amazingly the right decision. If Gaddafi had the S-300 at one time ... I would have looked how America would have established a no-fly zone over Libya ...

[SAM 5]

If Gaddafi had the S-300 at one time ...

IMHO Gaddafi had the S-200. But why not use it?

[hydrox]

Quote: SAM 5

If Gaddafi had the S-300 at one time ...

IMHO Gaddafi had the S-200. But why not use it?

Gaddafi had faith in the UN and in the inviolability of international laws, which now cost almost nothing (for those who have the STRENGTH and the desire to violate them)

[SAM 5]

Gaddafi had faith in the UN and in the inviolability of international laws

This was a fatal mistake.

[Vladimir 1964]

Quote: hydrox

Gaddafi had faith in the UN and in the inviolability of international laws, which now cost almost nothing (for those who have the STRENGTH and the desire to violate them)

An interesting point of view about Gaddafi, Dear hydrox. Although it is difficult to imagine Muammar who believes in the UN and international laws, the relationship with the laws, especially of European states, was quite original. For interest, take a look at the well-known story about the illegal financing of the election campaign of Sarkozy. You, a colleague, learn a lot about his faith in laws.

[Talgat]

Gaddafi decided that he was "friends" with the leaders of the West - he sponsored election campaigns, etc.

I didn’t understand that he was being “bred” - they are BANDITS - they seem to hold onto their own, and they take money - and then they CUT IT once and took all the money

It is very good that his death was a lesson to everyone else in the world, I am especially glad that the Iranians clearly understand that even successful recent negotiations do not make the west safe

Iran is our "cover" or "door" in the Caspian - and let it be closed to aggressors and strong bars. both S-300 and S-400 are not a pity for this

[figwam]

Probably Israel is sad.

[Taagad]

Israel has no sorrow, Israel soon has an F-35 and a lot of all sorts of drones. We will survive this trouble)))

[Albert1988]

Quote: Taagad

Israel has no sorrow, Israel soon has an F-35 and a lot of all sorts of drones. We will survive this trouble)))

The question is, how will your F-35s and "all kinds of drones" survive this very S-300 ... Especially when you consider that the F-35 itself did not come out so hot (considering the ratio of its cost and performance characteristics), so the cunning Americans are allies it will be sold with avionics having significantly "cut" characteristics, for example, the radar coverage radius of the Israeli F-35 (like all other export ones) will be several times smaller than that of the US ...

[Neksel]

Quote: Albert1988

Quote: Taagad

Israel has no sorrow, Israel soon has an F-35 and a lot of all sorts of drones. We will survive this trouble)))

The question is, how will your F-35s and "all kinds of drones" survive this very S-300 ... Especially when you consider that the F-35 itself did not come out so hot (considering the ratio of its cost and performance characteristics), so the cunning Americans are allies it will be sold with avionics having significantly "cut" characteristics, for example, the radar coverage radius of the Israeli F-35 (like all other export ones) will be several times smaller than that of the US ...

So the fact of the matter is that the Israelis install a lot of their equipment. Electronics, avionics. Leave almost only the glider motor itself. Take for example f-16.
So your comment on the cutback of cars, at least not exactly.

[Albert1988]

Quote: Neksel

So the fact of the matter is that the Israelis install a lot of their equipment.

The problem is that Israel does not have, for example, AFAR, which the Americans produce for the F-35 - simply because there is neither the intellectual nor the material base for its production, in general such equipment is produced in only a few countries, and all of them can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and Israel unfortunately is not included in this list, and this is just one example.
Hence my assumptions.

[Neksel]

Quote: Albert1988

The problem is that Israel does not have, for example, AFAR

For this I’m not particularly worried. I suppose that not all developments are known in mass circles.

Israeli AFAR debuted on the international arms market:
http://topwar.ru/57059-izrailskiy-afar-debyutiroval-na-mezhdunarodnom-rynke-voor
uzheniy.html

[Albert1988]

And TTX of this product, TTX? You don’t think so. that Israel, with its industry, can somehow get closer to the United States? Moreover, there is the main question - and whose components are used in this AFAR? Namely, whose semiconductor elements? I’m giving a reference - only countries such as the USA, France, Great Britain (the latter two with a huge lag behind the USA) are producing semiconductor elements for AFAR of acceptable quality for aviation radar systems, Russia is trying to do something for the T-50, but in the end it’s more likely to return to lamps instead of semiconductors (the benefit of the development already exists and shows itself perfectly, though not with Sukhoi, but with MiG), China is trying to do something, and it seems like Japan. Moreover, both Russia and China in this business are very far behind the amers.
The rest are bought either from Europeans or from amers. And if we consider that the Americans will not sell all the "best" to anyone, and the Europeans are well behind them, it is unlikely that Israel will have an airborne radar with a detection range of more than 40-50 kilometers.

[BABA SHURA]

Nude nude ... Iran has more power, even considering the effectiveness of the Jews

[Talgat]

I agree, Iran is a powerful country

But C-300 will not interfere with him, and I think that it is necessary to deliver there with 400 too

These complexes will prevent aggressors from attacking Iran, strengthen its stability against external aggression, this is a direct benefit both for Russia and for us - Kazakhstan, by the way too
On the good side, it would be possible to give a gift altogether, since this works for the security of both Russia and the entire CSTO - but Iran also PAYS - while closing all of us from aggressors from the south and ensuring security in the Caspian

A friendly neighbor in the Caspian should receive all kinds of help from us - otherwise we will get problems at the border - today they will burn the neighbor - tomorrow they will take for us

[volot-voin]

Quote: Zoldat_A

If Gaddafi had the S-300 at one time ...

Gaddafi flirted with America and the European Union for too long, for which he paid. These pay leash with broken shards))
If only, if only ... If there had been a Russian military base in Libya, no one would have slipped.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: volot-voin

If only, if only ... If there had been a Russian military base in Libya, no one would have slipped.

If Medvedev had not surrendered Libya, she might still have resisted the mattress civilized gopot, and we have not lost billions of dollars of contracts there.
By the way, Medved also slowed down the contract for the supply of S-300s to Iran in 2010, for the sake of mattress covers. They, of course, "appreciated" that Russia can easily nullify its interests in the region and flooded into Syria in 2011.
Pest in one word.

[nicolay338]

Are you completely sure what you are saying? That a good president suddenly made a mistake and appointed a pest president?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: nicolay338

Are you completely sure what you are saying? That a good president suddenly made a mistake and appointed a pest president?

And then he appointed or did not appoint? (The usual nonsense from the liberals)
The election procedure was formally followed, whether you like it or not
Judge by business.
In addition to the fight against promises, smoking and police reform, DAM was not seen in anything significant for the state.
And do not now include a disc about 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX - if he didn’t even respond to the shooting of Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia, then the impeachment procedure could be included

[nicolay338]

And you do not look at the president as at the president.
IMHO, everyone knew that GDP would return, and DAM - a catalyst for Russian society. He didn’t have to do any global things - don’t you find it?))) All that he did was a test for society. His whole term is an absurdity that can come to replace if the people do not support the current government. You must admit that the society withstood all this evil - both the police, and smoking, and poured out, and even a moronic translation of time. Now the government knows at least an approximate framework of bending into the pose of its citizens without a possible coup
PiSi: the only thing I do not understand is why they did not raise the retirement age. Although - this, apparently, would have been too much

[Weyland]

Quote: nicolay338

That a good president suddenly made a mistake and appointed a pest president?

If you want to back - it is quite logical to choose a successor much worse yourself!
And even if you do not plan to return ... the people together considered the emperor of Tiberius to be a tyrant, so he appointed Caligula as successor: it was then that the people appreciated that Tiberius was not so bad!

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Zoldat_A

If Gaddafi had the S-300 at one time ... I would have looked how America would have established a no-fly zone over Libya ...

I would say so - if Kadaffi did not pin money on the S-300

[VP]

It would be the same. The states had the opportunity to stupidly cast out the positions of the Tomahawks. A dozen or two axes per position and everything, or the installation is empty, or some made its way through the screen.
They have released something in Iraq in the region of a thousand Tomahawks, it is unrealistic to reflect such quantities in a pair of divisions.

[igorka357]

Iran would need another 150 su-30s to install it ..)))) !!! One can’t close the air defense, I’m telling you like an old air defense engineer!

[SAM 5]

Iran would need another 150 su-30s to install it

Yes, with their "Saeghe" you can’t really fight.

[Taagad]

Ready to give Iran 150 Su-30? With money they have weak ...

[Don]

Quote: Taagad

Ready to give Iran 150 Su-30? With money they have weak ...

In order to fulfill the contract for 150 Su-30 it takes about 5 years. They will cost somewhere around 7-8 billion dollars. And the military budget of Iran is 11 billion dollars. So don’t have to give anything.

[figwam]

Quote: Taagad

Ready to give Iran 150 Su-30? With money they have weak ...

I know who has little money, the FSA annually allocates 2 to 3 billion dollars to Israel. into service.

[Don]

Quote: igorka357

One air defense does not close the sky,

Why?

[igorka357]

Yes, because a combat destroyer is a very serious thing, and it’s not so easy to shoot it down, or you think one launch, one destroyed aircraft ... I’m in a hurry to dismantle! Iran itself does not make missiles, there are no Iranian air defense specialists, and the complex to put it mildly, not new! The S-300 is certainly capable of seriously spoiling the blood of the enemy’s air force, but not critically! Completely covering the sky ... only serious ground-based air defense combined with destructive aircraft can!

[Weyland]

Quote: igorka357

The S-300 is certainly capable of seriously spoiling the blood of the enemy’s air force, but not critically! Completely covering the sky ... only serious ground-based air defense combined with destructive aircraft can!

Critically or not - it depends primarily on the so-called. the coefficient of moral resilience of the enemy. I don’t know how the Jews are, and the Yankees, after just a few bombers shot down, will suddenly lose their desire to fight: they went to the army to kill, and not to be killed themselves!

[igorka357]

Yes, the Yankees are no longer the ones that bent over on the theater of war, but still do not think so, it leads to disastrous consequences sometimes! America, however, is very strong in military-technical equipment, bring down a couple of their bombers and if for them it will be a surprise .. the powerful air defense of the same Iran, they stupidly will emphasize the suppression of this air defense, which was demonstrated in the conflicts of recent years! Yes, and in Iraq several amer aircraft shot down did not discourage them from destroying this country to the ground, although air defense it was pretty decent there! You don’t have to think that the Yankees can’t fight without a piece of paper, they can .. and from this we should only get stronger and not yell that we are .. yes we have these one Yankees left! God forbid, there will be a serious conflict between the USA and Russia we will have to face a very strong adversary, but on the same strength with AK and MANPADS, against a high-tech fighter of this generation you will not go far, even if there will be a coward! Therefore, propaganda is propaganda, but we hope that and the best, and to prepare for the worst, it’s better to overestimate the enemy than not to overestimate!

[Don]

Quote: igorka357

Yes, because a combat destroyer is a very serious thing, and it’s not so easy to shoot it down, or you think one launch, one destroyed aircraft ... I’m in a hurry to dismantle! Iran itself does not make missiles, there are no Iranian air defense specialists, and the complex to put it mildly, not new! The S-300 is certainly capable of seriously spoiling the blood of the enemy’s air force, but not critically! Completely covering the sky ... only serious ground-based air defense combined with destructive aircraft can!

How much they are specialists can be judged only after a real check of the actions of their air defense. S-300 is quite different. S-300Pt and S-300PMU2 are quite different. In addition, besides the S-300, there are other air defense systems. In principle, they have aviation. A small amount of MiG-29 and F-14.

[Lord of the Sith]

Quote: igorka357

Iran would need another 150 su-30s to install it ..)))) !!! One can’t close the air defense, I’m telling you like an old air defense engineer!

It is enough to deliver two squadrons to sober up the heads of the "partners", but for the control of the sky, I agree 150 is needed.

[hydrox]

Quote: VseDoFeNi

Will Iran have the opportunity to establish a no-fly zone on the Persian Gulf?

This is not a no-fly zone yet, but this is a serious warning to Israel: now the Jews will not be able to bomb Iran without hindrance and they MUST have losses.

[theadenter]

For this, the Iranian military still needs to be trained to use them competently and in a timely manner. The delivery of air defense systems to Iran does not mean a mountain of downed aircraft.

But as a warning, I agree, a very weighty argument.

[Taagad]

And if not? In Lebanon, 1982. We had no losses with the maximum concentration of the latest air defense systems at that time and with the liquidation of the Syrian nuclear reactor covered by the Torahs.

[VP]

The flight time from Israel to Lebanon and to Iran is slightly different. Those. different time for reaction and organization of counteraction.
And you can’t afford to inflict a massive raid on Iran - there are not enough planes with the required combat radius.

[Lord of the Sith]

Quote: VP

The flight time from Israel to Lebanon and to Iran is slightly different. Those. different time for reaction and organization of counteraction.
And you can’t afford to inflict a massive raid on Iran - there are not enough planes with the required combat radius.

The biggest problem is very few refueling.

[Don]

Quote: Taagad

And if not? In Lebanon, 1982. We had no losses with the maximum concentration of the latest air defense systems at that time and with the liquidation of the Syrian nuclear reactor covered by the Torahs.

Syria air defense missile systems Thor was not.

[Vladimir 1964]

Quote: Don

Syria air defense missile systems Thor was not.

Sergey, what does Syria have to do with it? It was like Iraq, or you are so simple, to maintain a conversation, colleague.

[Don]

Quote: Vladimir 1964

Sergey, what does Syria have to do with it? It was like Iraq, or you are so simple, to maintain a conversation, colleague.

Where did you get that about Iraq. It was about the civil war in Lebanon.

[Vladimir 1964]

Quote: Taagad

And if not? In Lebanon, 1982. We had no losses with the maximum concentration of the latest air defense systems at that time and with the liquidation of the Syrian nuclear reactor covered by the Torahs.

Interestingly, Dear colleagues, for what you minus Taagad, there really were no losses. Or is it because of nationality.

[theadenter]

They first need to cover their airspace. And then get into "big politics".

[Samaritan]

Not bad news:
The Russian Almaz-Antey air defense concern ahead of schedule handed over to the Russian Ministry of Defense the second and tenth overall regimental air defense missile system (SRS) S-400 Triumph, one more set will be delivered before the end of the year.

[Alexandr-NVR]

Iran needs to work hard with money and build non-object. but a global air defense system. we need DRLO radar, electronic warfare systems, and from the means of destruction, besides the additional S-300 (you can’t cover the country with one regimental set), shorter range systems (Buki, Torah) and the last line (Armor, Strela-10). It is money and time, but safety is more expensive.
So I see it. Israel and the Americans will not give rest.

[Don]

Quote: Alexandr-NVR

S-300 (one regimental set does not cover the country)

So it seems like not one regiment, but 5 divisions should be delivered.

Quote: Alexandr-NVR

shorter range systems (Buki, Torah) and the last frontier (Armor, Strela-10)

They have Torah and Carapace, but not many. But they have a lot of Hoki.

[Geisenberg]

Quote: VseDoFeNi

Will Iran have the opportunity to establish a no-fly zone on the Persian Gulf?

Yes, do not care for Iran))) The main thing is that the Russian Federation begins to fulfill its obligations.

[Lord of the Sith]

So that there are no disputes, the map shows how much the Israeli Air Force needs to fly.

[venaya]

Iran then filed a lawsuit in the Arbitration Court of Geneva for almost $ 4 billion.

I believe that the loss in lowering oil prices caused by the supply of crude oil from Iran is fully compensated only by the fulfillment of even this contract, not counting other devidents from other, additional agreements with Iran.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: venaya

I believe that the loss in lowering oil prices caused by the supply of crude oil from Iran is fully compensated only by the fulfillment of even this contract, not counting other devidents from other, additional agreements with Iran.

Who squeals the most about what we will lose from Iranian oil supplies? That's right - our oilmen! Where does the money go from the S-300? Correctly in the budget. To paraphrase a well-known character, we can say to our oilmen: "Don't confuse your personal profit from oil with budget S-300s!"

That's when there will be a budget for the sale of oil not to receive taxes, but to make a profit, and oil industry workers not to sell oil as their own, but to receive a salary from the state, then we can think about competition in the world market. The Norgians over there nationalized the oil industry, and who says that they understand nothing in oil production?

[hydrox]

Quote: Zoldat_A

The Norgians over there nationalized the oil industry, and who says that they understand nothing in oil production?

So the point is not in norgs and not in mining, but in our home-grown liberals: they still believe that the bowels of the people squeezed out of the people are private property, which is, as it were, "sacred".
I think it’s time to deprive our liberias of their "sacred" virginity in matters of nationalization.
At least so that the social system does not have time to fall in Russia, and liberals do everything in order to exclude the entire social network from the budget, it has been squeezing funding for years.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: hydrox

they still believe that subsurface depressed from the people - private property, which is kind of "sacred".

Um ... And "Gazprom" on TV says that it is a national treasure. Strange ... Is it possible for me to receive a small part of the public property, attributable to me personally, in cash. I want to build a new barn in the country ... Or has Chubais already given everything that is due?

Don’t pay attention, it’s me so, d..ur..how I turn it on ...

[Deniska]

Don’t pay attention, that’s how I am, d..ur..how I turn on ... laughing

Without this registry I would put + :) And it sounds like an excuse from minus.

THOUGHT IS RIGHT !!!

[Yuyuka]

Um ... And "Gazprom" on TV says that it is a national treasure.

Didn't you notice that they changed the "national" to "national"? Everyone was too annoyed, everyone wanted to build a summer cottage, buy a mansion, just like you ... how are we people! Now only on "figs" will give! According to nationality I am trying to define "national" - who is this?

[ermak.sidorov]

Uraka then Uraka, but very topical happened =) about the shed

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Yuyuka

Too all annoyed, everyone wanted to build a cottage like you, to buy mansions ... how are we people!

Quote: ermak.sidorov

that’s very topical =) about the shed

Yes, everything was built long ago. And without anyone's help - somehow without Gazprom, and without Rosneft, and without Rusnano he managed ... Not mansions, of course, but all that is needed for the soul is. And most importantly, he didn’t ask anyone for anything and shouldn’t owe anything to Gazprom ...

And our mansions have somehow developed historically, most often among those who shout the most about "national heritage". Well, or "national" ...

[venaya]

Quote: Zoldat_A

The Norgians over there nationalized the oil industry, and who says that they understand nothing in oil production?

Only now I don’t think that the Norwegian Pomors could solve this issue on their own: Putin doesn’t want to leave comprador liberalism, perhaps not by chance, not of his own free will. Something tells me that the ties here are steeper. After all, Norway is poor without oil production; here, concessions to the Norwegians are apparently caused by many other, not very noticeable reasons.

Quote: hydrox

So the matter is not in taxes and not in production, but in our home-grown liberals

Oh, I do not believe in the home-grown liberals, they themselves did not muddle up all this, not their initiative, more complicated everything, they are being controlled from behind the hill.

[Taagad]

Not compensated. Losses on lowering oil prices - hundreds of billions of dollars, earnings on military supplies to Iran - billions of dollars

[Boris Zidkov]

Taagad.You remind you of a professor in your mindset.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Boris Zidkov

Taagad.You remind you of a professor in your mindset.

Yes, I generally have a feeling that someone wanders here from under the star-David-striped flag - they are sitting at the same computer and, together under different profiles, jointly issue a joint decision. As a rule - malevolent and evil.

[Bronik]

Iran will get C 300 complexes. And its opponents will have other "complexes." For example, respect.

[Gavril]

To someone who is trying to cover his sky on the drum which umbrella is his opponent

[igorka357]

Respect complexes ..)))? I dare to rephrase you, because you didn’t put it correctly, the Air Force of Iran’s opponents will have a set of inferiority due to the great possibility of hard landing!

[hydrox]

Quote: bronik

Iran will get C 300 complexes. And its opponents will have other "complexes." For example, respect.

This will not be a complex of respect, it will be a recognition that this airspace has a host who will not allow some robbers to fly into it with impunity and throw bombs with UNBREAKLESS.

[Wolka]

left for little, to establish the "Iranian border" and the impunity of the Yankees and Turks in the region will sharply decline, and the Saudis will swell from their belligerence ...

[Magic archer]

Yesterday, the news showed a report and it announced the intention of the Saudis to buy C-400! The question is, why should we arm the American allies ?!

[paxil]

Quote: Magic Archer

Yesterday, the news showed a report and it announced the intention of the Saudis to buy C-400! The question is, why should we arm the American allies ?!

Well, these are only the wishes of the Sauds so far, but I don’t think that ours will go for it. If they go, it will be in a very truncated form, like the Chinese. The photocopiers could not really copy the S-300, they could not even come close to the characteristics. Export options do not give out the main secrets of production.

[SAM 5]

! The question is, why do we need to arm the American allies?

Like, the loot does not smell.

[hydrox]

Quote: Magic Archer

Yesterday, the news showed a report and it announced the intention of the Saudis to buy C-400! The question is, why should we arm the American allies ?!

And who said that we will arm them?
The desire to buy does not mean the desire to sell - it is a weapon, and the political component in this deal is much more than the commercial one.
And do not refer to the Shell: it was made only in accordance with the technical specifications that the Saudis declared, in addition to making an advance payment for the development (and a considerable one, something of the order of $ 50 lard).
Our modernization of the Shell is 2 times better than the Saudi.

[rotmistr60]

Now Iran's "best friends" will go into a collective howl. But the train has already left, so they will have to swallow this pill and restrain their warlike ardor.

[Same lech]

The contract for the supply of C-300 air defense systems to Iran came into force

What will Israel say?

Now bombing objects on the territory of IRAN with impunity will not work.

[hydrox]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

What will Israel say?

And Israel needs to better figure out who to "lean" against in the Middle East policy - they are slowly moving away from the United States (the goofs understood that the States are draining them!) - so this process must be accelerated.

[Boris Zidkov]

The same Lech. What will Israel say? He won’t say anything. His pace stood on end.

[Rurikovich]

Yes, you need to rake the shoals of the presidency LADIES! And he surrendered Libya, which actually led to chaos in the Arab world, and flooded against Iran, supporting the West in its game. Only now Iran was not afraid to sue for breaking the contract. The same picture was observed with the Mistrals. Have saved the face of the Ayrapean partners ??? Yeah, that's just they never did this for us, but always tried to harm by any means ...
I understand that politics is a dirty game, but "partners" cannot be defeated by truth and concessions alone. Sometimes you have to beat them with their own weapons, responding to reproaches: "you've got enough"
Then it will be good.
Personally, my opinion

[Sars]

Can't hear who our next president will be? It is urgent that the Iranians close the contract, otherwise it’s not even an hour. DAM will be cut off again.

[Sars]

Can't hear who our next president will be? It is urgent that the Iranians close the contract, otherwise it’s not even an hour. DAM will be cut off again.

[igorka357]

We are waiting for the professor ...))) Right now, he will trample, but we will fly and we will fly .. your S-300 is old-fashioned, it’s not right for him to fly and write .. with an emphasis on I.

[viacheslav77]

And what kind of design based on the Ukrainian car is shown in the photo?

[Mercury]

On the first S-300 delivered to Iran, the Iranians will write - "Nitonyahu to Gilyaku"

[slizhov]

So, you see, soon there will be no place for the Yankees to fly, off the coast ... :) !!!!

[Old26]

Quote: VseDoFeNi

Will Iran have the opportunity to establish a no-fly zone on the Persian Gulf?

It is still very, very far away. For the delivery of this amount of S-300 will not make the weather. Iran's air defense is an incredible mixture of everything that is possible. Starting from our "Pantsyry" and ending with complexes of the C-75 type. These are mainly short-range missiles of the mid-70s. Of the new ones - 3 dozen "Thors". S-200 - 10 launchers. The rest is a large number of obsolete ones - Crotal, Rapira, Tigerket, Hawk, S-75 and a large number of MANPADS. In addition, in Iran, in fact, there is no air defense aviation, and as correctly noted igorka357 air defense alone cannot close the sky. There are not enough modern radar facilities. And his adversary, unfortunately, has a sufficient number of countermeasures capable of "overloading" the air defense system. So it won't be a no-fly zone soon

Quote: Alexandr-NVR

Iran needs to work hard with money and build non-object. but a global air defense system. we need DRLO radar, electronic warfare systems, and from the means of destruction, besides the additional S-300 (you can’t cover the country with one regimental set), shorter range systems (Buki, Torah) and the last line (Armor, Strela-10). It is money and time, but safety is more expensive.
So I see it. Israel and the Americans will not give rest.

In addition to "straining yourself with money", one should not forget that Russia's industry is not dimensionless either. In order to completely re-equip at least the air defense and air force of Iran, it will take decades ...

[teron]

I do not really understand the joy of commentators. Iran is not the most friendly country in Russia. Why? Yes, because our interests intersect in the Caspian region. My grandfather served in the USSR PV on the Iranian border and talked about provocations and tension. And here are friends. No, I’m not about to quarrel. Iran just does not pull on Russia's natural ally. Why do we need to develop and strengthen the defense capabilities of a neighboring country, which claims to be the leader in the region, claims to create nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles, and denies the right to exist for other states (for example, Israel). And if the regime there is neutral to us today, then a coup could easily happen in Iran tomorrow (just don't think that the United States is not working in this direction) and Iran will become hostile to us. And the weapons delivered to us in this country will remain with them. And perhaps it will already be nuclear. Much more natural for Russia in this situation, allied relations with Israel, no matter how it sounds wild to anyone. We do not need a strong Iran near our southern borders, so we need to weaken it in every way, so as not to grow our competitor in the Caspian basin. And to do this with the natural enemy of Iran is easier.

[Zomanus]

About Iranian C-300 I hear almost more than about the collapse of Ukraine.
So let the first batch come to Iran, then we will applaud.
Because now it is still at the level of words.

[chunga-changa]

Well, did it make sense to roll around for so many years? What prevented the immediate delivery, and now the S-400 is preparing to sell?

[Abrekkos]

Quote: Magic Archer

Yesterday, the news showed a report and it announced the intention of the Saudis to buy C-400! The question is, why should we arm the American allies ?!

And then, that our Air Force will not wet our Air Force even they will press a button. But if they buy the Patriots then they will bring down and how.

Well, the S-400 is not an offensive but a defensive weapon, and in general is not very new. Let them defend themselves, but not from us.

What are they afraid of? Let them customize the loot.

[Knight Rider]

A contract was signed for the supply of S-300PMU-2 air defense systems to Iran
The deal, according to Kommersant’s data, is about $ 1 billion. The complexes will be delivered no earlier than mid-2017.
Here is the details of http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1570067.html