Zakharov: which formations in Syria are terrorist, and which - opposition, experts will decide

The negotiators in Vienna to resolve the conflict in Syria agreed that the lists of terrorist groups operating in this country will be compiled at the expert level, RIA News statement by the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Maria Zakharova.


City Homs, Syria

“It was understood that experts who have been involved in international terrorism for many years should hold consultations in order to develop a common understanding of who these terrorists are,”
reported Zakharova.

According to her, the parties to the Vienna talks came to the general opinion that "for progress on the Syrian settlement, it is necessary to reach an understanding on a number of key issues." “And then it will be possible to build the Syrian process from separate parts,” Zakharova added.

In addition, she noted, Moscow handed over to its negotiating partners a list of those organizations that it considers to be oppositional.

“Russia has done its homework: a list of almost 40 organizations of the Syrian opposition we have developed and handed over to our colleagues,” said the Foreign Ministry spokesman.

“The ball is now on the side of the partners,” Zakharova noted. - They have to look, add someone, maybe they don’t agree, but our list includes almost all the forces that are healthy from the point of view that they do not use either extremist or terrorist methods in defending their political interests. "
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Finches 2 November 2015 08: 42 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Our experience of the Khasavyurt agreements suggests that a terrorist is always a terrorist, even if he mows under the opposition for some time! I don’t think that you need to exchange and go under the West - there is a legitimate government today and enough.
    1. stalkerwalker 2 November 2015 08: 48 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      The experience of the Minsk agreements suggests that a long and difficult path lies ahead in resolving the situation in Syria.
      In contrast to the situation in the Donbass, Russia has a trump card - the legitimacy of the presence in Syria of a VKS group performing a military-political mission.
      1. Yuri from Volgograd 2 November 2015 08: 51 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: stalkerwalker
        The experience of the Minsk agreements suggests that a long and difficult path lies ahead in resolving the situation in Syria.
        In contrast to the situation in the Donbass, Russia has a trump card - the legitimacy of the presence in Syria of a VKS group performing a military-political mission.

        You are certainly right, but the world community in the person of the United States and their henchmen themselves come up with who is legitimate and who is not.
        With a certificate from Obama, any terrorist will be considered a righteous person and a sufferer.
        1. Good me 2 November 2015 09: 05 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Zakharov: which formations in Syria are terrorist, and which - opposition, experts will decide


          Satanovsky and Zhirinovsky, experts!

          1. Zoldat_A 2 November 2015 09: 25 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Good I
            Satanovsky and Zhirinovsky, experts!

            I absolutely agree, and without any irony. If you read what you wrote and listen to what Zhirik said more than 20 years ago, it turns out that at first everyone laughed together, and then without any humor they quietly did what he wrote and said. I don’t know if it’s a coincidence or someone up there in the Kremlin strictly embodies the precepts of grandfather Zhirinovsky, but remember how amicably neighing over “boots in the Indian Ocean” and “enlarged administrative divisions”? And then without the laughter created the Federal Districts and Peter the Great regularly visits Mumbai, as if on duty ... And this is not all examples.

            And Satanovsky with his healthy sobering cynicism is generally necessary for any politician as a consultant. At least there is knowledge of the issue, subtleties of foreign policy and other things - enough for five ...
            1. Good me 2 November 2015 09: 30 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              I absolutely agree, and without any irony.


              Irony, in my comment, well what ... somewhere only at 1 / 2 percent.
              1. Zoldat_A 2 November 2015 09: 34 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Quote: Good I
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                I absolutely agree, and without any irony.


                Irony, in my comment, well what ... somewhere only at 1 / 2 percent.

                Yes, I'm not talking about you specifically in the sense of irony. Our people are simply used to laughing at Zhirik, like a clown. Yes, it’s a little expressive ... But to read and listen, and then compare what is really being done - amazing coincidences ... hi
                1. Good me 2 November 2015 09: 53 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Zoldat_A
                  Yes, I'm not talking about you specifically in the sense of irony. Our people are simply used to laughing at Zhirik, like a clown. Yes, it’s a little expressive ... But to read and listen, and then compare what is really being done - amazing coincidences ...


                  I do not argue. It would be our government (although Zhirinovsky represents the branch of power, but there is no right to make a decision behind him), but listen to OPERATIVELY to sound thoughts, and Zhirinovsky, and others.
                2. veksha50 2 November 2015 10: 08 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Zoldat_A
                  to read and listen, and then compare what is really being done - amazing coincidences ...



                  So to speak, on time and to the place expresses the aspirations of not only the people, but also the Kremlin ...
                  1. Zoldat_A 2 November 2015 17: 29 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: veksha50
                    So to speak, on time and to the place expresses the aspirations of not only the people, but also the Kremlin ...

                    That's the joke that Zhirik will first say, and then the Kremlin will do in 15-20 years. I read here the other day his literature 92-93 of the year of release for the sake of purely sports interest. Wow! And about Syria in 94 I wrote what is happening now, and about the Islamic Caliphate, and about refugees, which will give Europe a glimpse ... Stunned right! recourse

                    I also heard from someone from the liberals that Zhirik works, like, for the Kremlin - in the Kremlin, before doing something, they give it to Zhirik and study the reaction of the electorate. I don’t know, maybe ... But, I think, he is too uncontrollable and unpredictable figure to use him insolently. It’s inconvenient to work with him. It’s much easier to come up with some kind of Kursavel bully ... That one is much more manageable.
        2. stalkerwalker 2 November 2015 09: 10 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Yuri from Volgograd
          the world community in the person of the usa and their henchmen

          Nah ... It's not the public at all, these are potential patients of the Kiev psychiatric hospital laughing
          1. Good me 2 November 2015 09: 58 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: stalkerwalker
            Nah ... It's not the public at all, these are potential patients of the Kiev psychiatric hospital


            In the Kiev psychiatric hospital, the Chief physician, orderlies, all the staff, a long time needs to be changed. It is ripe and overripe.

            And only then, to define such a "public" there ... Otherwise, it turns out, by the way they feel there that we took the sick people like Matveyushka Govnopolsky to the resort ...
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Oleg NSK 2 November 2015 09: 11 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          ... the USA and their henchmen themselves come up with who is legitimate and who is not

          ... absolutely agree
          ... the main problem is to determine the terminology ... and this is most likely impossible, because our so-called "partners" are the creators of this very terrorism ... and in fact, they are not just accomplices of terrorism, but its the top ...
          ... and the question is what to talk about with them? ... at least they themselves need to "clean off" or at least change their "masks" (as it was already, at the end of the Second World War) ... without this, all negotiations are meaningless ... and all efforts are futile (Minsk an example)
        5. DanSabaka 2 November 2015 16: 35 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Well, while the reference frame is written out, everyone needs to be wet ... and Allah himself will figure out who was legitimate and who was not .....
      2. hydrox 2 November 2015 09: 31 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: stalkerwalker
        the legitimacy of the presence in Syria of a VKS group performing a military-political mission.

        Normal move: they were already asked to give targets - they didn’t give, they asked to indicate where it was not necessary to bomb - they did not indicate. Now the opportunity arises to say: we are working with the reconnaissance of the Syrian army, we see a hotbed of armed resistance - well, you can’t see from a height of 5 km who is fighting against the SAA!
        And if they give the coordinates of the location, the ATS still has its own aviation and helicopters, but we will not touch them lol .
      3. voyaka uh 2 November 2015 11: 06 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        for stalkerwalker:

        Absolutely.
        And the key to ending the civil war in Syria is Turkey.
        They have a northern border, refugee and militant camps, all supplies.
        They can drag the war to infinity if they want.
        They will have to sit at the negotiating table, as with a leading player.
    2. Tor5
      Tor5 2 November 2015 08: 59 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      I completely agree! Our pilots work closely with the legitimate government of Syria. And the west breaks into its territory as a violator of borders.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. atalef 2 November 2015 09: 02 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Finches
      Our experience in the Khasavyurt Accords suggests that a terrorist is always a terrorist, even if he mows under the opposition for some time! I don’t think that you need to swap and go under the West - there is a legitimate government today and enough

      Ie (as I understand it) there are 40 opposition organizations with which Russia is ready to work?
      They are the opposition to Assad (as I understand it), fighting against him.
      interesting . How does Iran and Assad relate to this?
      1. Finches 2 November 2015 09: 28 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I hope this is just a diplomatic pun after Vienna!
      2. Zoldat_A 2 November 2015 09: 30 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: atalef
        Ie (as I understand it) there are 40 opposition organizations with which Russia is ready to work?
        They are the opposition to Assad (as I understand it), fighting against him.
        interesting . How does Iran and Assad relate to this?

        As I see it, our "work with them" will be that we will not bomb them. And in response, they will not shoot Assad. And BECAUSE, after ISIS - elections, parliamentary struggle, etc. But without machine guns. As I understand it...

        However, there, above, there may be some other opinions - it is ultimately up to them, not me, to decide.

        Although, I think, these bearded and parliamentary methods of political struggle are some kind of parallel universes ...
        1. atalef 2 November 2015 14: 31 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          As I see it, our "work with them" will be that we will not bomb them. And in response they will not shoot Assad

          And who will they be in?
          ISIS? I doubt it.
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          And BECAUSE, after ISIS - elections, parliamentary struggle, etc. But without machine guns. As I understand it

          Suppose further?
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Although, I think, these bearded and parliamentary methods of political struggle are some kind of parallel universes.

          In general, Syria was one of the most secular countries of the BV. Of course, democracy was not there (and it is not needed there) - but some semblance of elections existed.
          I’ll tell you, as long as it comes to a semblance of elections, a sea of ​​time will pass, the Alawites will not be able to resist, the Assad will be removed much earlier.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      3. hydrox 2 November 2015 09: 35 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: atalef
        How does Iran and Assad relate to this?


        Good question, but ... for counterintelligence.
        Our business will now be offered to these 40 groups to quickly and quickly escape from the combat zone, and who didn’t hide ... well, we warned you!
    5. Zoldat_A 2 November 2015 09: 15 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Finches
      Our experience of the Khasavyurt agreements suggests that a terrorist is always a terrorist, even if he mows under the opposition for some time!

      Yesterday they said on television in the news that The Al-Nusra Front declared its withdrawal from ISIS (or something like that) and the transition to the banner of moderate opposition.

      What does America think there? Terrorists will run back and forth, and we will guess - to bomb or not to bomb? There is a legitimately elected president of Syria. Our troops are acting in agreement with the legitimately elected President of Syria. All who shoot at him are enemies and must be destroyed. The Americans want - let them take them to their home in Texas and there they figure out which of them is more moderate ...

      The older generation, of course, remembers Captain Blood's Odyssey by R. Sabatini. Remember what tricky feint he threw with the patent of the captain of the Royal Navy? The main thing is to pull it out of the sleeve in time, and then toss it out in time ... So these bearded ones. Here we are goats - and here we are lambs ....
    6. marlin1203 2 November 2015 10: 17 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well what nonsense! First, what kind of "experts" should they be? Secondly, on the basis of what will they conduct the examination? Thirdly, do terrorists have party cards, contracts, accurate lists? And in general, they are now quickly “reorganizing” to “moderate” and that’s all ...
  2. Observer2014 2 November 2015 08: 43 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Zakharov: which formations in Syria are terrorist, and which - opposition, experts will decide
    Here, in the next world they’ll sort it out! Who was who, who is active, who is a passive terrorist.
  3. Decathlon 2 November 2015 08: 43 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    "... experts will decide ..."
    Pathologists ?! repeat
    1. kagorta 2 November 2015 08: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      No, it's VKS wink
    2. Angro Magno 2 November 2015 09: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Everything is easier. Allah will understand in the next world.
      The opposition will give opposition gurias, the terrorists - the terrorists.
      1. hydrox 2 November 2015 09: 39 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        To satisfy, and then oytsy bit off?
        E-mine, they will be deprived of the only wealth of the Orthodox! lol
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Wolka 2 November 2015 08: 48 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    however, in Syria, the war, and not even a civil one, in my opinion the terrorists are those who oppose the regular Syrian army and the B. Assad’s government, the war will end, then respected by the opposition and declare yourself by generally accepted methods, participate in agitation but without weapons, take part in the elections in the end, but if now, being an ideological opponent of B. Assad’s policy, you are fighting against his government and the regular army, you’re definitely a terrorist ...
  5. SAM 5 2 November 2015 08: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the parties to the Vienna talks agreed that “for progress on a Syrian settlement, understanding is needed on a number of key issues

    They came to the opinion, but how this question will be actually solved.
  6. RUSOIVAN 2 November 2015 08: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And these experts will sit at the controls of Russian bombers !!!
  7. A1L9E4K9S 2 November 2015 09: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    He who fights against a legally elected government is clearly an enemy of the people and the state, and here the division into good and bad terrorists cannot be used, they are all smeared in one world and must be destroyed.
  8. 31rus 2 November 2015 09: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, where is the progress? This is another dead end, tomorrow the United States will provide its list of 30 items, mutually exclusive ours and what's next? Another question, which experts, from which countries, organizations? This is a way out of the problem and so there’s nothing to be solved, and there’s no time "in our" interests, the Americans will artificially create an "opposition."
    1. hydrox 2 November 2015 09: 43 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      They will not create, drown in the swamp of votes and approvals.
      For Russia, on the other hand: there are occupied territories, and there are liberated ones, the front line between them, and whoever is behind the front line is the enemy, regardless of color.
  9. afrikanez 2 November 2015 09: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Again, e.p.c.p.r.r.t.s., this bagpipe will never end. Why is it time to pull so that the IS receives new weapons and regroups? fool Do not hell at all to listen to these "Western shit-democrats"
  10. cniza 2 November 2015 09: 12 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Decathlon
    "... experts will decide ..."
    Pathologists ?! repeat



    By DNA? belay But seriously, the West simply does not know what to do.
  11. Almatinets 2 November 2015 09: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    took a weapon - it means he went into terror. experts in the furnace
  12. sl22277 2 November 2015 09: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Anyone who fights against Lawful Authority in arms is a Terrorist. He must either lay down his arms and surrender, or be destroyed. What other expert decisions can be expected when there is a mass murder of people ?!
  13. roskot 2 November 2015 09: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    A muddy thing is to determine who the terrorist is. For states and Europeans, this is Assad. For most Syrians and Russians, this is ISIS. So everyone has their own lists.
  14. veksha50 2 November 2015 10: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "hold consultations to work out common understanding who these terrorists are "...

    But what, armed people opposed to a legitimate government and killing their fellow citizens are not terrorists ??? Need some special understanding ???

    From our point of view, it is necessary to destroy everyone who is against the current state system in Syria ... And no consultations ...
  15. Anchonsha 2 November 2015 10: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The West, by its Jesuit inclinations, will now try to distort everything in the definition of a terrorist, because they need them to carry out precisely the Western tasks in the Middle East, however, in Central Asia and on the African continent.
  16. evge-malyshev 2 November 2015 11: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well done Zakharova. This is not psaki for you. "... did her homework."
  17. ilija93 2 November 2015 12: 06 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    yeah, the opposition views of the pedophile on the gender and age of the child are just a matter of taste! The flag is in the hands of experts.