Military Review

To the oppositionist: "Take the greatcoat, let's go home"

98
Dear oppositionist,


I understand that about the record rating Putin has not written yet just lazy. Or lazy. That is, I. In my defense, I can say that I used my laziness to good effect. Because, once again being in the midst of a large cluster of Russian compatriots from all over our vast country, I managed not only to believe in this transcendental rating, but also to check it. According to the results of the check, I can state with confidence: leave unnecessary doubts, dear oppositionist. These figures are real - Russia is almost unanimously standing behind its president’s wall. In some areas, as it seemed to me, this rating can reach the absolute - 100%.

I was lucky to talk with people from numerous regions of the country: Moscow, St. Petersburg, Irkutsk, Krasnodar, Surgut, Belgorod, Sakhalin, Petrozavodsk, Kostroma. They are all great people. Quite calm, not violent, not cocky, not stupid. And one and all, firmly and with a bit of a challenge, confirmed: Yes, we unconditionally, on 100% trust our president. Yes, we feel behind him, like a stone wall. Yes, he gives us a sense of security. Yes, with him we look to the future with confidence. Yes, during his tenure as president, Russia was able to rise from its knees and become a powerful world power. Yes, we agree that we must beat first, not waiting until they hit. Yes, we want to be feared. Yes, we will give our children to defend their homeland.

And dozens and dozens of unconditional, uncompromising "yes." People are satisfied with pensions, medicine, opportunities, prospects. And the most important "yes" is a sincere, ardent desire to see Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin as its president many, many, many times. Moreover, one woman declared that she would not even vote if the candidates did not include the last name Putin. Only he is able to keep the country afloat, and the world is in fear. Only he can curb corruption, rebuild the broken and protect his citizens. "God give him strength, health and the desire to control us further."

I do not know how it was under Stalin, only read. Feeling of reading stories - not so much loved, though, of course, not without it, how many were afraid. Although crying when he died, from the heart. Nikita Sergeevich, if I am not mistaken, was treated in a mixed, if not neutral, way: neither love, nor fear, nor hatred, nor special respect. Only if a sense of gratitude for deliverance from the horrors of Stalinism. Pretty quick evaporated. This left the impression of reading. "Dear Leonid Ilyich" certainly did not like - here I am a witness. Rather, the habit of worship. Well, they laughed, of course. It is possible that he is the first, except for the weak, lifetime attempts to play a trick on Khrushchev’s corn and uncouthness. Yeltsin, of course, was not loved. But at first very much respected. This is also the first time in my opinion. But the current leader, according to my observations, is loved, respected, honored, and feared. In his face, citizens see a defender, mentor, an example to follow, a versatile, energetic, healthy leader. In the modern history of our country, in my opinion, this is also the first time. Three, four, five - in one.

Google, when typing in the search for the phrase "alpha male" will certainly produce a picture with the image of V.V. Putin in one form or another. It was a complete discovery for me. For personal reasons, I needed to find an image of an “alpha male”, and already in the process of searching I came across this amazing phenomenon. Somewhere between the unrelenting Brad Pitt - Arnold Schwarzenegger - Jason Statem in all species and orangutans, also in all species, a photo, drawing or demotivator with the image of our president was surely provided. Of course, some of these pictures are full of irony, and even sarcasm. But still a huge number of photographs, not excluding, however, sarcastic, clearly proves his status as an alpha male for his tribe. When searching for the words "macho" or "real man", the image of Vladimir Vladimirovich is much less common, but it still occurs. But Obama, or Cameron, or some other Western political leader, I did not see on any request.

Judging by the impression I received, the Russians are ready to lay down their lives for their president. Many of them lived with at least three long-playing rulers (I do not take into account the period when Russian-Soviet leaders died with statistical regularity), and they can only speak about the present with pride. You and I, dear oppositionist, are terrified that the president in every possible way promotes the culture of the streets, the culture of the streets, which he has carried through his whole life, embodying with pleasure the science obtained on these streets, and the citizens of the country are touched and proud of it. His maxim “With the possible threat of a strike first”, was aspirated by compatriots within an hour after it was said. To my question: "And who, who threatens us?", The answer was: "And no one! Because He will not allow us to threaten! ”

Of the twenty citizens I surveyed, only one person found a flaw in the activities of the president and did not keep silent about him. According to the guy from Surgut, who moved to live in Central Russia, in Kostroma, V.V. Putin pays insufficient attention to agriculture. And even worse - he allowed it to almost destroy. The rest expressed one hundred percent support for all his actions and words, without exception.

What is there to talk about, dear oppositionist? Why resent, waving flags, slogans? Arrange rallies, pickets? Against who? Against the monolith, which is a huge country, unconditionally believing and selflessly loving its hero, its Illya Muromets, Dobrynya Nikitich and Alyosha Popovich in one person? So what, that Russians can love with no less, if not more passion than they hate. Maybe let love? After all, if our fellow citizens, almost all of them, are good, then why change something? For whom to change something? How to change something? Who needs casualties, casualties, fighters and the struggle itself, if no one expects change? So let us rejoice, my dear fellow oppositionist! Take advantage of this respite. As they say, "take your overcoat, let's go home." Save power and experience. Watch. Study. Folk lump, this 90-percentage mass of people will call us when they decide that they want a new Illya Muromets or Dobrynya Nikitich or Alyosha Popovich. The main thing - do not miss the moment and be ready to help. In any form.
Author:
Originator:
https://openrussia.org/post/view/10291/
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. venaya
    venaya 31 October 2015 06: 04 New
    +2
    Why be indignant, waving flags, slogans? Arrange rallies, pickets? Against who?

    And what does Putin have to do with it? The indignation is caused by figures below, possibly loafers, and possibly worse.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 31 October 2015 06: 31 New
      24
      Judging by the impression I received, Russians are ready to lay down their lives for their president
      - and what, are there really such fanatics? what that is, not for the homeland, namely for the president? winked
      1. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 07: 04 New
        14
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        that is, not for the homeland, namely for the president?

        Against the monolith, which is a huge country, unconditionally believing and selflessly loving his hero, his own Ilya Muromets, Dobrynya Nikitich and Alyosha Popovich
        crying wassat
        Ну зашла бы к нам почитала комментарии полные любви.. к статье "О новом назначение Сердюкова"
        1. dauria
          dauria 31 October 2015 12: 24 New
          +6
          Ну зашла бы к нам почитала комментарии полные любви.. к статье "О новом назначение Сердюкова"


          good Это ниже пояса.. Госпожа автор только что примирила буржуазию с рабочим классом " Why be indignant, waving flags, slogans? Arrange rallies, pickets? Against who?" , а Вы так сразу с козырей..... smile
          1. NordUral
            NordUral 31 October 2015 19: 00 New
            +2
            Otherwise, he will not understand in his delight. This Oksane brains would include and think about where we support Putin, and where we believe that he is doing something wrong. In my opinion, foreign policy is more or less successful (not without comments, of course), but politics in the country is a mistake after a mistake, if only these are mistakes and not deliberate actions of a liberal.
            And his policy will not bring the economic country to good.
        2. Yars
          Yars 31 October 2015 19: 40 New
          0
          You should learn to trust the president and his decisions! In your articles there are always pseudo patriots - liberals, they are all so clever ..... you know there is a good proverb - p ... singing is not a bear!
          1. Yars
            Yars 31 October 2015 21: 28 New
            0
            Quote: YARS
            bears

            sorry, sealed up ...
      2. BMW
        BMW 31 October 2015 09: 07 New
        +6
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        and what, are there really such fanatics?

        Yeah, ISIS is resting. Now the coolest of all HPP. Author fool
        1. avg
          avg 31 October 2015 12: 38 New
          +8
          The liberal journalist here is true to herself - she just cannot help but lie.
          Якобы цитируя Путина, она пишет: «При возможной угрозе бей первым», а куда из цитаты делось: "...если драка неизбежна"? А ведь это полностью меняет смысл сказанного. Если бы мы, в соответствии с этой сентенцией, действовали в 1941 году, то мировая история развивалась бы по другому. и у меня в семье на несколько человек было бы больше.
          А ее следующий "наивный" вопрос «А кто же, кто нам угрожает?» для нормального журналиста, по меньшей мере, - глуп.
          Да, и откуда у либерасни шинель? Колготки подтянули и "Аглы!".
        2. Sid.74
          Sid.74 31 October 2015 13: 04 New
          +1
          Дожили,теперь на ВО уже очерки с "открытой России" Ходарковского публикуют.
    2. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 October 2015 06: 51 New
      19
      Quote: venaya
      And what does Putin have to do with it? The indignation is caused by figures below, possibly loafers, and possibly worse.

      "Деятельностью правительства удовлетворен"(С)
    3. Enot-poloskun
      Enot-poloskun 31 October 2015 06: 55 New
      14
      But I do not care about the ratings. These are all Western tricks for blurring consciousness.

      About Putin Putin is the ruler of Russia. The state where I live. And that's it.

      It is not easy for our homeland ... After the hard times of the 90's and the destruction of the USSR. A lot is destroyed. Many positions in the world have been surrendered. Corruption. Indifference.

      The recovery process has now begun. I see the sprouts of the new Russia. What it will be is up to us.

      And now the environment is hostile. We are under siege. And Putin is the ruler of our state. And - to hell with ratings!
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 31 October 2015 07: 25 New
        +9
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        The recovery process has now begun.

        Serdyukov appointed in the aviation industry
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        I see the sprouts of the new Russia.

        What is she like?
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        What it will be is up to us.

        Nothing depends on the electorate, he delegated power to the vote and that is where his role ended, it’s impossible to recall a deputy.
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 09: 17 New
          10
          Quote: sa-ag
          What is she like?

          still smells of gas and oil ..
          1. sa-ag
            sa-ag 31 October 2015 09: 30 New
            +7
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            still smells of gas and oil ..

            Well, in this case you can’t name a new one, if industrial policy were declared a priority, then you could still see what the novelty is
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 09: 59 New
              +2
              Quote: sa-ag
              Well, in this case you can’t name a new one, here

              There is nothing new under the sun ... Solomon
              1. sa-ag
                sa-ag 31 October 2015 10: 13 New
                +1
                Quote: afdjhbn67
                There is nothing new under the sun ... Solomon

                Rather, Ecclesiastes :-)
                1. Alena Frolovna
                  Alena Frolovna 31 October 2015 10: 36 New
                  +4
                  It is not easy for our homeland ... After the hard times of the 90's and the destruction of the USSR. A lot is destroyed. Many positions in the world have been surrendered. Corruption. Indifference.


                2. afdjhbn67
                  afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 10: 58 New
                  -1
                  Quote: sa-ag
                  Rather, Ecclesiastes :-)

                  read who said it there
                3. demidov.evg
                  demidov.evg 2 November 2015 20: 30 New
                  0
                  Solomon and Ecclesiastes (i.e. the preacher is Greek) are one and the same person! )))
          2. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 31 October 2015 10: 48 New
            +1
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            still smells of gas and oil ..

            It is interesting to know what Russia should smell like, what would you like? Blood, burnt tires, Molotov cocktails or American boots?
            Russia now has 5 allies - the Army, Navy, Gas, Oil and 90% of the people of the supportive president, which you do not belong to.
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 10: 56 New
              0
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              It is interesting to know what Russia should smell like.

              No need to get excited, throwing stamps and extremes
              1. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky 31 October 2015 12: 45 New
                +1
                Quote: afdjhbn67
                No need to get excited, throwing stamps and extremes

                Yes, I somehow do not get excited.
                Просто реально достаёт то, что как раз "штампами и крайностями" чаще всего оперирует так называемая "либеральная оппозиция" эксплуатируя термины "НЕФТЬ и ГАЗ".
                Well, what if, for now, this is precisely the resources that contribute to filling the budget. Do you have an alternative offer, which, right from Thursday or Saturday, will be able to steadily fill the treasury? No.
                Therefore, yes, Russia smells of oil and gas. For the rest, you need a new government, plan and time.
                1. Yars
                  Yars 31 October 2015 19: 45 New
                  0
                  everything is correctly said !!!
      2. hydrox
        hydrox 31 October 2015 07: 29 New
        +4
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        We are under siege.


        We are not under siege, we are at the very neck, but Putin is firmly on our shoulders.
        И либеральная "неразборчивость" Путина в выборе своего окружения ещё принесёт нам мыло на верёвку, которую мы сами себе уже приготовили.
        Дивизия "Гайдар" и при ЕБНутом жила хорошо, а будет жить ещё лучше:: с Путиным, или Кудриным - либералам безразлично, потому как в надёжных либеральных руках содержатся ВЛАСТЬ и ДЕНЬГИ.
      3. Lelek
        Lelek 31 October 2015 10: 05 New
        +1
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        Putin is the ruler of Russia. The state where I live. And that's it.


        Both you and Oksana are absolutely right. Putin is the president (with his advantages and disadvantages), for whom I voted. I do not see any alternatives yet.
        Оксана, Вам "лайк" за статью.
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 31 October 2015 11: 10 New
          13
          Quote: Lelek
          Оксана, Вам "лайк" за статью.

          I do not understand such attacks on the side of the opposition, based on an empty place.
          Let's laugh together how Serdyukov and Vassiliev got out of the dirty history, how the ex-head of the Ministry of Agriculture Skrynnik lives poorly in France, how our ministers are rewarded for driving money abroad or creating structures for retired bureaucrats - like Rusnano. the law will not rule and the life of a citizen will not become the main value of the state, there will always be a danger of coups and revolutions, and the opposition will feel better than a fish in water. Because there is no better traitor in the state than a stealing official and no president’s rating will save such a country! !!
          1. dmi.pris
            dmi.pris 31 October 2015 19: 29 New
            -1
            Let's better regret the unfortunate Serdyukovs and Vasilevs, because they were robbed of them like sticky .. (and what kind of things they covered up ..) Well, they left them the very crumbs (a billion per brother or sister) They say Garant himself had a hand in the robbery of these poor fellows. ..
            Quote: APASUS
            Quote: Lelek
            Оксана, Вам "лайк" за статью.

            I do not understand such attacks on the side of the opposition, based on an empty place.
            Let's laugh together how Serdyukov and Vassiliev got out of the dirty history, how the ex-head of the Ministry of Agriculture Skrynnik lives poorly in France, how our ministers are rewarded for driving money abroad or creating structures for retired bureaucrats - like Rusnano. the law will not rule and the life of a citizen will not become the main value of the state, there will always be a danger of coups and revolutions, and the opposition will feel better than a fish in water. Because there is no better traitor in the state than a stealing official and no president’s rating will save such a country! !!
      4. loki-reyngard
        loki-reyngard 31 October 2015 18: 42 New
        +1
        What are these sprouts? It’s ridiculous. We are in a hostile environment, not serious. Of course, Putin is the ruler. But whose state is crooks, thieves and embezzlers? This is obscured by the consciousness of the domestic media - for now nothing depends on you, does not depend on anyone, it depends only on Dvorkovich, Nabiullina ... So far there are not enough Russians, real ones!
      5. Uncle Joe
        Uncle Joe 31 October 2015 19: 34 New
        +2
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        Putin is the ruler of Russia.

        I see the sprouts of the new Russia. What it will be is up to us
        In 2009 you were clearly and clearly told what it would be like.

        Путин: "Вы видите, у нас не произошло ни масштабной национализации, ни сползания к всеобщему административному регулированию. Мы сохранили свободное движение капиталов и конвертируемость рубля. Уверен, что все это послужило убедительным сигналом для инвесторов, и хочу еще раз подчеркнуть и сказать: возврата к прошлому не будет. Russia will remain a liberal market economy. Сегодня я хочу еще раз повторить: мы будем последовательно продолжать линию на поощрение частной инициативы, на интеграцию в мировое хозяйство, на формирование благоприятного инвестиционного климата".
        http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=317679
      6. Mera joota
        Mera joota 31 October 2015 22: 19 New
        +1
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        The recovery process has now begun. I see the sprouts of the new Russia. What it will be is up to us.

        blah blah blah ... just read the news feed ...
        Rostec entrusted Serdyukov with a structure with an annual revenue of 350 billion rubles.
        Former Minister of Defense Anatoly Serdyukov became the curator of the aviation assets of Rostec State Corporation. Under it are concentrated corporation structures with revenue of about 350 billion rubles. in year

        Physicist Mikhail Danilov fired from Kurchatov Institute
        The leadership of the Kurchatov Institute decided to reduce the physicist Mikhail Danilov, laureate of the international prize Max Planck. The administration indicated that there were no longer any places in the institution that corresponded to its qualifications.

        чтобы понять какие люди нужны стране "новой России"...
    4. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 07: 13 New
      +9
      Quote: venaya
      The indignation is caused by figures below, possibly loafers, and possibly worse.

      You force the battered classics back - the king is good, the boyars are unimportant ... yes
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 31 October 2015 07: 48 New
        +5
        The article is malicious and caustic ... And the main thing in it I think!
        The main thing is not to miss the moment and be ready to help. In any form.

        Remember the 90s men! They are waiting for the moment to repeat everything, but already in order to completely destroy Russia! Be careful ...
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 08: 08 New
          +5
          Quote: MIKHAN
          ! completely destroy Russia! Be careful ...

          This is Meehan, are you talking about the government ?? In charge of.. laughing
          Read an article about the draft budget for 2016 hi
          And not these snot on the fence, about Ilya bl.in Muromets ..
          1. MIKHAN
            MIKHAN 31 October 2015 08: 29 New
            +2
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            This is Meehan, are you talking about the government ?? In charge of..

            Yes, about everyone ..! Even here on the site there are a lot of those who communicate nicely and wait for it to start ... hi
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 08: 46 New
              +3
              Quote: MIKHAN
              waiting for it to start ...

              Do not wait .. the steam will blow the whistle .. hi
              No offense, I sometimes refer to you, but we are on the same line, only I am the extreme right, and you are the extreme left .. well, or vice versa, if you don’t like it .. soldier drinks
          2. NordUral
            NordUral 31 October 2015 19: 10 New
            +2
            I’ll add my own, or rather government, nickel:
            http://mirnov.ru/rubriki-novostey/ekonomika/rossijane-s-dohodom-svyshe-7-tysjach
            -mogut-lishitsja-lgot.html

            What do you call it ......? And I am not a liberal, I am a certain Stalinist with some. And the adherent of that country of the 40-50s, which Khrushchev began to kill ub_l_yudok, and the rest finished off completely.
      2. venaya
        venaya 31 October 2015 07: 56 New
        0
        Quote: afdjhbn67
        You force the battered classics back - the king is good, the boyars are unimportant ...

        Если на примете нет более подходящева "Царя", что ещё нам остаётся делать, сопли жевать. Не так уж и велик у нас выбор: "Политика - искуство возможного" - это относиться, в том числе, и к нам самим, как бы нам не хотелось иного. Если у вас есть другие, конкретные варианты решений, милости прошу, сообщите, не стесняйтесь.
        1. Uncle Joe
          Uncle Joe 31 October 2015 19: 58 New
          +2
          Quote: venaya
          Если на примете нет более подходящева "Царя", что ещё нам остаётся делать, сопли жевать. Не так уж и велик у нас выбор: "Политика - искуство возможного" - это относиться, в том числе, и к нам самим, как бы нам не хотелось иного
          Politics is an area of ​​interest.

          To pursue a policy means to take actions aimed at maintaining or changing social or interstate relations in accordance with the goal, in the interests of any social groups.

          В интересах каких групп проводит государственную политику "царь", можно судить по его действиям и пояснениям к ним.

          Путин: "Мы должны думать, что нам делать, как выстраивать свою политику. Разумеется, будем действовать в логике рыночной экономики"
          http://www.rg.ru/2015/01/21/putin-ekonomika-site.html

          Путин: "При амнистии капитала вопрос не в возврате капитала, а в его легализации"
          http://tass.ru/ekonomika/1656342
    5. Skif83
      Skif83 31 October 2015 08: 35 New
      +7
      Well ... Putin is responsible for them! Rather, for their action or inaction.
      And if they
      loafers, and possibly worse
      , i.e. pests, enemies, etc., why do they continue to occupy their seats with impunity?
      Why no one was responsible for the multi-billion dollar theft, squandering, etc. Two governors and five officials are not an indicator.
      Putin is responsible for everything related to governing the country!
      What’s called, he was called (elected) president, be kind, keep your Government in a pair of mittens!
      Something like this ...

      As for the article of a pacified young lady (everything is too smooth for her), so twenty people interviewed do not know where, they are unknown for what reason ...
      In short, even talking on this topic is ridiculous.
      Only one of the respondents said something about farming. I suspect that he is one of them and has heard at least something about agriculture.
      If you interview young people, then with the modern level of education (once the best in the world), many can be very unpleasantly surprised!
      1. Chertkov Oleg
        Chertkov Oleg 31 October 2015 08: 50 New
        +3
        Russia almost unanimously stands behind its president. In some areas, as it seemed to me, this rating can reach an absolute - 100%.

        No matter who says it, a toast - To the Tsar, Fatherland and Army is very popular with us drinks
        1. BMW
          BMW 31 October 2015 09: 15 New
          +6
          Quote: Oleg Chertkov
          and a toast - For the Tsar, Fatherland and Army is very popular with us

          Come on, now a long velvet tongue is very popular. The article just drowned in a sneaky half-bent.
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 31 October 2015 09: 53 New
            +1
            Quote: bmw
            The article just drowned in a sneaky half-bent.

            Не понимаю я Вас! Что значит подхалимство? Автор высказывает свою точку зрения. Причём здесь подхалимаж? Что лично поимеет автор от такого "подхалимства"? Я, простой русский труженик, всегда поддерживал и поддерживаю политику нашего президента, скажите это тоже подхалимство? Где я и где Путин! Какое здесь подхалимство? Я смотрю, здесь на сайте, многие, непререкаемым считают только своё мнение, а мнение оппонента для них, это извращение и в ответ на поддержку Путина, сыпятся комментарии:"Вот это лизнул".
            (It was in response to my comment. Now let's see how many minuses I pick up)
            1. Uncle Joe
              Uncle Joe 31 October 2015 20: 15 New
              +4
              Quote: SRC P-15
              I, a simple Russian worker, always supported and support the policy of our president
              Privatization, attraction of foreign investments (the essence is the sale of sectors of the economy to foreigners), protection of the interests of big capital, integration into the world economy, reduction of social guarantees and commercialization of medicine with education?

              A simple Russian worker will never support such a policy - only an enemy of the people can support such a policy.

              The author expresses his point of view
              And it’s most convenient to express your point of view of such quality from London, which is the residence of all patriots supporting Putin’s policies.
          2. veksha50
            veksha50 31 October 2015 10: 11 New
            0
            Quote: bmw
            The article just drowned in a sneaky half-bent.


            If you made such a conclusion, then it means you read the article inattentively ...

            Please reread the last paragraph of the article ... There is no fuss, there is an opposition liberal mine ...
            1. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 31 October 2015 12: 54 New
              +3
              Quote: veksha50
              Please reread the last paragraph

              Quote: Tambov Wolf
              And what do you want?

              Normal article on the topic of the day yes
              The article is addressed to the furious lovers of the president.
              If you love, then why shriek about a liberal government, Vasiliev’s amnesty, appointment of Serdyukov, embezzlement, the collapse of medicine and education?
              If you love, then bear it, love is evil wink
              And smile gentlemen, smile!
            2. BMW
              BMW 31 October 2015 14: 36 New
              +1
              Quote: veksha50
              Please reread the last paragraph of the article.

              Excerpt from the article and comments here
              Against the monolith, which is a huge country, unconditionally believing and selflessly loving its hero, its Ilya Muromets, Dobrynya Nikitich and Alyosha Popovich in one person? Surely something, but Russians know how to love with no less, if not more passion, than hate. Maybe let them love? After all, if our fellow citizens, almost all of them, are fine, then why change something? For whom is something to change? How to change something? Who needs casualties, losses, fighters and the struggle itself, if no one is waiting for change?

              Now I’m not complaining, but looking at a few years in advance, tryndets can be seen with the naked eye.
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              I, a simple Russian worker, have always supported and support the policy of our president, tell me, is this also a sucker?

              I also supported him and even voted for the first and last time. Just your mind is deaf and I'm really sorry. Yours faithfully hi
              1. SRC P-15
                SRC P-15 31 October 2015 17: 59 New
                +1
                Quote: bmw
                I also supported him and even voted for the first and last time. Just your mind is deaf and I'm really sorry. Yours faithfully

                But I hope that when you supported Putin and voted for him, didn’t you consider this to be vulgarity?
                My mind is not deaf, but just the experience of the past years allows me to have an opinion that is different from some. I said and I repeat that having established business on the external front, Putin will also deal with internal problems. Although timid attempts at this, he is making now. And I'm also sorry if you do not understand this. Yours faithfully hi
          3. Tambov Wolf
            Tambov Wolf 31 October 2015 11: 29 New
            +1
            А что Вы хотите? Мне кажется "девушка" или отрабатывает российское гражданство или зарабатывает его.У нас же как,если "артист" или "боксёр",то лично гарант даёт гражданство за два часа.А если простой человек,то ещё не факт,что его получит,да ещё без отката.
        2. Loner_53
          Loner_53 31 October 2015 18: 23 New
          -1
          Quote: Oleg Chertkov
          No matter who says it, a toast - To the Tsar, Fatherland and Army is very popular with us

          Oleg, a colleague, this is what we have IS drinks
      2. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 31 October 2015 10: 52 New
        -1
        Quote: Skif83
        What’s called, he was called (elected) the president, be kind, keep your Government in tight rein! Somehow ...

        Is it like Yeltsin or something?
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 11: 32 New
          +1
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Is it like Yeltsin or something?

          You have a day of unsuccessful analogies today .. wink
          1. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 31 October 2015 13: 34 New
            +2
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            You have a day of unsuccessful analogies today ..

            Yes, completeness to you sir)))
            Просто товарищ, вот так легко, в трёх предложениях обнулил роль ВВП в деле возрождения России после разрушительных 90-х. Ну-у невозможно отрицать очевидные вещи - Россия ныне не та, что была ещё 15 лет назад. Согласен, что экономика у нас слаба и не так эффективна как бы всем нам хотелось, но, как говаривал Козьма Прутков-"Нельзя объять, необъятное". Согласитесь, что наши экономические пробуксовки в значительной степени инициированы извне. Что бы этому противостоять, нужна сильная Россия, которая способна отстоять свой интерес если не дипломатическим путём,(что, как показала практика последних 25 лет не эффективно)то военным путём.
            For that matter, the most outstanding statesman in the history of Russia was I.V. Stalin, who was strong in both domestic politics and foreign politics. But for liberals, Stalin is an absolute evil and dictator, without taking into account the obvious achievements of the USSR. The rest of the general secretaries and presidents alas, were effective either, or. That in general, GDP has a strong foreign policy and a weak domestic one, so there will always be those who will be dissatisfied with something. Today, a strong foreign policy is still more important, because without this, external pressure will constantly be exerted on Russia to intervene in its internal affairs.
    6. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 October 2015 11: 34 New
      +7
      And what does Putin have to do with it? The indignation is caused by figures below, possibly loafers, and possibly worse.
      Тсс, только никому не говорите, открою страшную тайну, в правительство всех министров приглашал лично дорогой Владимир Владимирович и даже госпожу Эльвиру. Он всеми доволен, благодарил, награждал. С губернаторами тоже лично общался перед "выборами".
    7. mark2
      mark2 31 October 2015 17: 23 New
      +1
      as always, tsar's father - he is good, these are bad boyars))) And GDP, with all its merits, cannot restrain him? or does not want? Or maybe we are not catching up with something? maybe IM - the boyars are allowed to do whatever they want within the framework of the permitted Darkest?)
      1. Loner_53
        Loner_53 31 October 2015 18: 36 New
        0
        I would put you a hundred pluses smile
    8. wiktoor
      wiktoor 1 November 2015 21: 35 New
      -1
      The author of the article is simply commissioned. Let her carefully-patriotic tone not be misleading. She fell and in Africa fell.
      We have different roads with this su.ka.
  2. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 31 October 2015 06: 04 New
    +3
    Yes, they themselves understand this and especially do not jerk. But we must not lose our vigilance! You do not put us to sleep!
    1. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 07: 15 New
      +9
      Quote: armored optimist
      You do not put us to sleep

      Bayu - bayushki - bayu .. change your armor ..
      a gray top will come (a scribe in our opinion), your optimism will carry away .. laughing
      1. Armored optimist
        Armored optimist 31 October 2015 07: 43 New
        +1
        Do you have a personal dislike for me?
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 08: 00 New
          +2
          Not at all .. just a different expression of emotion .. I am rather impressed by your sequence - so I am joking kindly, not minus .. hi
          1. Armored optimist
            Armored optimist 31 October 2015 08: 56 New
            +1
            I understand and do not minus either.
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 09: 14 New
              +1
              But someone followed us successively, with minuses - even on our comments that didn’t hurt anyone drinks
              1. The comment was deleted.
      2. BMW
        BMW 31 October 2015 09: 18 New
        +1
        Quote: afdjhbn67
        Bayu - bayushki - bayu .. change your armor ..

        He laughed for five minutes. good You are a comedian however.
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 09: 51 New
          0
          Quote: bmw
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          Bayu - bayushki - bayu .. change your armor ..

          He laughed for five minutes. good You are a comedian however.

          Glad to try your nobleness .. soldier
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer 31 October 2015 06: 08 New
    +2
    Good article .. I’ll add from myself. The guy who moved from Surgut is completely right. I have a lot of relatives in the black earth. The fertile land !!! But .... most of this land is neglected, collective farms breathe frankly and the villages die. In mine, where I I spent all my childhood, grandmothers and grandfathers remained. Young people left. Nobody wants to live in such conditions and earn a penny! Salaries on the collective farm of 10 thousand !!! They live off households and gardens. And so almost everywhere. Belgorod stands out separately. for the better. But this is more likely an exception to the rule. I hope with the current things will go better with import substitution, but so far unfortunately there are no progress .....
    1. satris
      satris 31 October 2015 07: 10 New
      +2
      А Белгород, что, против Путина идет? Кто не дает Воронежу, Курску, Липецку и пр. развивать сельское хозяйство? Вложения нужны? Так будут! "Мираторг" объявил, что в Белгородской области уже все построил, что нужно, переходит в Воронежскую. Не все сразу, господа! Но, кроме Мираторга, что, других нет? Брынцалов куда делся? А то в платную автодорогу СПБ-Москва хотел вложиться, почему бы в Костромское масло не вложиться?
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 31 October 2015 07: 25 New
        0
        Investments are needed, there is no dispute. But who will work? !! The village will die out as an administrative unit !!! And it was agriculture that always stayed on it. But with farming, it’s kind of bad for now. And about the oligarchs ... Well, here all questions are about power. If they click on our rich, they may start pouring money. Voluntarily, nobody wants to. Oil and gas have always given more money than grain, meat and cereals hi
        1. veksha50
          veksha50 31 October 2015 10: 17 New
          +2
          Quote: Magic Archer
          The village will become extinct as an administrative unit !!! And it is on it that agriculture has always been kept.



          I’m not afraid to be pompous, however, from time immemorial Russia was leaving the village at the expense of the village ... including during the dashing war years ... And now it has been practically destroyed ...

          PS What do you want? They entered the WTO ... As a result: this year the magnificent potato was born, and for some reason, the potatoes in the stores are Israeli and Egyptian ... Question: where is ours ???
          1. BMW
            BMW 31 October 2015 15: 01 New
            +3
            Quote: veksha50
            Question: where is ours ???

            Answer: rotted-s.
            Even on the central heating transmission was about a jacket, and so, farmers do not know in whose ass to hammer it, because the networks buy it at the cost of profitability.
            Кстати парадокс: у нас местная камчатская картошка весь год продовалась в розницу по цене 25-35 рублей, китайская по цене 45 рублей. Вопрос к хреновым "экономистам", что делает низкокачественная и дорогая иностранная кортошка в нашей торговле.
            1. veksha50
              veksha50 31 October 2015 16: 41 New
              0
              Quote: bmw
              Question to horseradish "экономистам", что делает низкокачественная и дорогая иностранная кортошка в нашей торговле.


              На этот вопрос сможет ответить только "эффективный" манагер...
          2. mark2
            mark2 31 October 2015 17: 53 New
            -1
            I don’t know where yours is, and ours is in the stores.
        2. mark2
          mark2 31 October 2015 17: 51 New
          0
          what does it mean who? Yes, urban and will work! Do you think that in the West the villagers work in the fields? No ordinary city dwellers. Working in the field is the same work, working day, weekend, vacation, lunch ... everything is like in the city, only there is much more space than in the office. The main thing is to be able to handle equipment, not to be afraid of cattle and not to be afraid of labor. And then they took it as a fashion to divide it into urban and rural, those who can plow and those who can not plow, are suitable only for office work. There is no work in the city - there is a lot of it in the village. And yes. about 10 s / n - the bullshit. there salaries are not lower than in the city. at least so with us. But city workers are not really eager for work ... but for now. will run there. In cities, less and less work ..
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. mark2
      mark2 31 October 2015 17: 45 New
      +3
      Everything is developing, I live in Tambov. We have the most chernozem zone of all chernozem zones. Everything grows, everything is eared. And that the village is dying ... So the days have gone by when the fields were cultivated by whole state farms and collective farms. Look at agricultural machinery? Now one tractor both plows and sows, and reaps and straws itself in bales. You do not need a huge number of different cars. Now everyone is driven by a farmer and his freelance workers. Although they say that our farm is not in the best shape, but in comparison with what?
      There are no collective farms and their return is not expected.
      And we also build a new sugar factory, I say for sure, I myself take part in its construction. A huge one that will be releasing sugar from everything that is suitable for the production of sugar year-round without stopping.
      And yet, for several consecutive years in our country record yields, did not notice ?. If they had not sown, they would not have stung. So the whole groan of relatives about the agricultural / village. there is no truth. The village is dying because it is necessary to love the land. be able to and most importantly want to cultivate it. And this is hard, very hard work. That's why they run to the cities where it’s easier, where the day is normalized.
      Significant successes, but there are still problems in the production of meat and milk. but it’s a matter of time. It’s already being worked on and reinforced. Import substitution works, maybe not as we all would like, but it works. Who can’t wait to quickly replace everything and everything - they will be happy to meet with open arms. But there is one condition. Will have to work like a slave in the construction of the pyramids.
  4. exalex2
    exalex2 31 October 2015 06: 17 New
    10
    И только Путин всегда ни причём..А кто тогда причём? Любое действо совершается с Его согласия, ну, или как минимум Одобрения..Докажите обратное, если сможете. "Майские" Указы, типа не его рук дело?? Но если их никто не исполняет, значит ли это что его нет. Значит всем всё пофиг, ответственности нет и спросить не с кого.Всех всё устраивает. Но ведь так не бывает? Или бывает? Мы просто имеем то что имеем. Ходите на выборы, и тогда не будет 146%
  5. Masya masya
    Masya masya 31 October 2015 06: 17 New
    20
    "Люди довольны пенсиями, медициной", ну это вы явно переборщили...
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 31 October 2015 07: 50 New
      15
      Да уж! ....С "медициной" думаю многие сталкивались!
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 31 October 2015 08: 07 New
        +4
        Quote: Bayonet
        Да уж! ....С "медициной" думаю многие сталкивались!

        I came across! I can’t say anything bad, but it’s hard for the doctors, they never demanded bribes .. and I was not deprived of attention! (Although it may have been lucky for the real doctors) hi
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 08: 19 New
          +8
          Quote: MIKHAN
          I came across!

          Well, if you, like me, are attached to a departmental clinic as a hospital, then of course I agree with you, but those who are to the district, etc., will definitely get worse ..
          1. MIKHAN
            MIKHAN 31 October 2015 08: 53 New
            +4
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            Quote: MIKHAN
            I came across!

            Well, if you, like me, are attached to a departmental clinic as a hospital, then of course I agree with you, but those who are to the district, etc., will definitely get worse ..

            If so, I would not have boasted about it ... The sick beds are ordinary and rather shabby both externally and internally (but for me comfort was not always the main thing)))) ... hi
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 09: 12 New
              0
              Quote: MIKHAN
              If so, I would not have boasted about it.

              I don’t boast what to brag about?
            2. Bayonet
              Bayonet 31 October 2015 09: 35 New
              +3
              Quote: MIKHAN
              .Hospitals are ordinary and rather shabby externally and internally (but for me comfort was not always the main thing)))) ...

              Well, in such not only treatment, but scary to die! I had a chance to lie down with one acquaintance, almost at the same time, I’m in the commercial department of the policy from work, and he is at the medical institute. I am in modern, and he in such as you describe. We have a toilet and shower between two rooms for 4 people, and he has one for the entire ward. And when someone pumped up a laxative for examination or surgery, here they have fun and started! fellow Look for the medicine yourself. In general, to be treated for free - to be treated for nothing hi
        2. Bayonet
          Bayonet 31 October 2015 08: 57 New
          +1
          Quote: MIKHAN
          I came across! I can’t say anything bad, but it’s hard for doctors, they have never demanded bribes.

          May God grant you health and a saved wallet! What is lucky is lucky! hi
          1. MIKHAN
            MIKHAN 31 October 2015 09: 28 New
            +2
            Quote: Bayonet
            Quote: MIKHAN
            I came across! I can’t say anything bad, but it’s hard for doctors, they have never demanded bribes.

            May God grant you health and a saved wallet! What is lucky is lucky! hi

            Soon I’ll go again, but already to the clinic ... (my beloved aunt died there recently, after the operation .. it seemed that everything was fine, but alas ..) Today they will bury .. I can’t go, as if I wouldn’t fall in there myself. ..I'm in shock! hi
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 10: 07 New
              0
              Quote: MIKHAN
              I can’t go, as if I myself wouldn’t fall there

              What do you say .. hold on bro
        3. mikh-korsakov
          mikh-korsakov 31 October 2015 11: 36 New
          +1
          To me, currently a simple pensioner, without running around relatives in the district hospital, aorto-coronary bypass surgery was done free of charge, and they did well. Another thing was the restoration took place in unacceptable conditions, one point in the latrine for 50 people. Well, then I'm alive. And if someone drags out a song, nodding to the West, oh, and how it is, I can only object that it is getting better 15 years ago. in the same hospital, I washed my face in the washbasin in the morning in the presence of the deceased. Now there is no such thing, and as for the latrine, the therapeutic building was repaired, and now it is decent.
          1. Bayonet
            Bayonet 31 October 2015 12: 54 New
            +1
            Quote: mikh-korsakov
            To me, currently a simple pensioner, without running around relatives in the district hospital, aorto-coronary bypass surgery was done free of charge, and they did well.

            Well and good, be healthy and live long! But my friend 8 years ago (in the regional hospital did) after such an operation on the second day he died in intensive care, from Saturday to Sunday. They say they did not inspect ... True, they took 180000 money before the operation. That's it. request
    2. veksha50
      veksha50 31 October 2015 10: 19 New
      0
      Quote: Masya Masya
      "Люди довольны пенсиями, медициной", ну это вы явно переборщили...


      You still do not understand that the author’s article is a complete banter ...
    3. liuk gud
      liuk gud 1 November 2015 19: 17 New
      0
      People are never satisfied with salaries anywhere.
  6. Vityok
    Vityok 31 October 2015 06: 39 New
    10
    Everything is said in my opinion
    1. exalex2
      exalex2 31 October 2015 07: 00 New
      +4
      Вот она и есть настоящяя "правда". Пока живы "выходцы" из СССР, Мы просто не можем позволить себе такую "роскошь".Уйти и никого не "прихватить"
    2. exalex2
      exalex2 31 October 2015 07: 00 New
      0
      Вот она и есть настоящяя "правда". Пока живы "выходцы" из СССР, Мы просто не можем позволить себе такую "роскошь".Уйти и никого не "прихватить"
      1. Masya masya
        Masya masya 31 October 2015 08: 16 New
        +5
        Не нодо называть меня " выходцем". "Я родился в Советском союзе, сделан я в СССР"
    3. veksha50
      veksha50 31 October 2015 10: 26 New
      0
      Quote: Vitek
      Everything is said in my opinion


      Here in the hall to drive the Presidential Administration and Government, and make listen to this song ... but more than once ...
      1. mark2
        mark2 31 October 2015 17: 56 New
        0
        and they already heard her more than once. They are on the drum. Power is far from the people)
  7. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 31 October 2015 06: 54 New
    +4
    It seems to me that everything in the article is too optimistic. The president is respected by the people, it is difficult to disagree, but there are many questions to him that await an answer, what did you not write about them, was it laziness? But for 100 percent approval there should not be any ambiguities and questions and because of these issues, of course, there is no need to become an opposition, because they are all solved in the end, but they must be resolved according to the workman and constantly and without delay box. Let’s not be too lazy, the author, if you’ve taken it, don’t leave anything in the shadow of silence, otherwise this may not seem to someone enough to take your greatcoat right away and return home from the opposition. For the first part of the article, I put you a plus and the actions of our President are also very much satisfied today.
  8. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 31 October 2015 07: 08 New
    +5
    Let's reason, just reason. Are we living better than 1999? Perhaps yes. I hope it’s not for anyone, it’s no secret that European zp and pensions demanded that euro states sacrifice sovereignty? Ready for such sacrifices? Me not. And imagine, for a second, what would it be if EBN would be engaged in foreign policy? Presented? Want to? Me not. I understand perfectly (unlike the average Kyivan) that I’d better not live. But at the same time, at least there will be no war in my city. And this is worth something. Despite the fact that half the world wants to drag us to pieces, it is worth a lot. I am not strong in economics, but something tells me that sovereignty is always a compromise between defenses and the degree of fatness of citizens. Maybe I'm wrong ...
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 October 2015 11: 55 New
      +1
      Maybe I'm wrong ..
      Да нет вы правы, поэтому предлагаю в конституцию Рф сделать запись, "Президентом России является Путин В.В. до 2050г"
    2. Uncle Joe
      Uncle Joe 31 October 2015 20: 55 New
      -1
      Quote: Observer 33
      Are we living better than 1999? Perhaps yes
      Perhaps the same. Can you enlighten - where do you see improvements, and how were these improvements achieved?

      I hope it’s not for anyone, it’s no secret that European zp and pensions demanded that euro states sacrifice sovereignty?
      It’s a secret for me - maybe you don’t really understand what state sovereignty is, which you submit as an unconditional good?

      Ready for such sacrifices?
      Which and in consequence of what?

      what would it be now if EBN was engaged in foreign policy?
      To defend the interests of raw material capital, he would send the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to Syria under the guise of fighting IS, Crimea would most likely remain Ukrainian, and Ukraine would remain a fraternal country in the minds of the peoples, and a partner on the same terms for the Russian oligarchy.

      Despite the fact that half the world wants to drag us to pieces
      Did they tell you this on TV?

      I am not strong in economics, but something tells me that sovereignty is always a compromise between defenses and the degree of fatness of citizens
      Not only in economics, but also in political science, as well as in the terminology of the indicated disciplines.
  9. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 31 October 2015 07: 10 New
    +3
    Quote: afdjhbn67
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    that is, not for the homeland, namely for the president?

    Against the monolith, which is a huge country, unconditionally believing and selflessly loving his hero, his own Ilya Muromets, Dobrynya Nikitich and Alyosha Popovich
    crying wassat
    Ну зашла бы к нам почитала комментарии полные любви.. к статье "О новом назначение Сердюкова"

    At the same time, none of us in a terrible dream dreamed of adjoining the camp of opposition liberals, snotty, excuse me - a woman’s writings ..
  10. sl22277
    sl22277 31 October 2015 07: 35 New
    +2
    I do not idealize Putin and the people he represents, but it seems to me that we need a strong and independent state: Russia.
    The Russian nation, Russia, despite all its intrigues, did not split into small pieces and did not lie under Europe, occupies one sixth of the earth’s surface with a population that is quite small in general. Most importantly: It’s not a shame for him! PS And salaries and pensions are an important issue, even a very important one. I am not satisfied with salaries, pensions and medicine ...
    1. Uncle Joe
      Uncle Joe 31 October 2015 21: 07 New
      -1
      Quote: sl22277
      but it seems to me that we need a strong and independent state: Russia
      Эта Ваша фраза будет оставаться пустой абстракцией до тех пор, пока Вы не сформулируете - в чем выражается сила и независимость государства, кому "нам" нужно сильное и независимое государство, для чего этим "нам" нужно такое государство, и, самое главное, which one сильное и независимое государство этим "нам" нужно - рабовладельческое, феодальное, капиталистическое, или социалистическое (то есть на достижение каких целей и в чьих интересах это сильное независимое государство должно быть заточено).
  11. Neophyte
    Neophyte 31 October 2015 07: 44 New
    -5
    Странно,но некоторые особи ставят "минус"? Статье,безусловно "плюс",ибо сказанное
    confirmed by realities.
  12. Indifferent
    Indifferent 31 October 2015 07: 47 New
    15
    I was born in the first half of the 20th century. He found Stalin. And I found others all the more. Therefore, I disagree with many what the author wrote. Who are happy with modern pensions, who is this? Virtual creatures? My wife receives a pension of 5800 rubles. Neighbor in the landing 6200r. The wife’s girlfriend from the neighboring entrance 8200r and so on ... Nobody gets for 10 thousand. And if there are any, then units. Husbands rescued. They earned money and received their own pension. Therefore, it was enough. Two husbands died. If they come to visit, they cry. They do not know how to live on such a pension. One apartment takes more than half of the pension. It remains only for bread and so on the little things.
    Now at the expense of Stalin. He was not afraid! He was loved, and sincerely. He gave real freedom to the majority of the people and created a normal life in the country. Won a monstrous war. I remember very well when he died and was officially announced, most of the women cried. I was then a kid and it surprised me.
    К Хрушеву в начале у народа было хорошее отношение. Он почти убрал цензуру, разоблачил культ личности, пытался что-то делать с сельским хозяйством. Начало 60-х воспринималось в стране, как начало свободы. Все вздохнули полной грудью. Родилось целое поколение " шестидесятников". Но Хрущев был волюнтарист. Законов не признавал и стал опасен для власти. Его убрали и посадили Брежнева. И к тому отношение складывалось разное. Начать с того, что лучше чем при Брежневе мы не жили никогда. Сейчас, если вспоминают СССР, то Брежневские времена. Ведь это не только очереди и распределиловка. Это практически отсутствие преступности, гарантированная учеба и работа, гарантированный отдых и здравоохранение и многое другое. Даже квартиры все работающие рано или поздно получали бесплатно. На работу при Брежневе можно было выпимши ходить. Особым проступком это не считалось. (Понимаю, что это нехорошо, но факт, для многих мужчин приятный).
    But starting with Gorbachev I can’t say anything good. Sheer betrayal, swathed by beautiful speeches about perestroika.
    I can only say good things about Putin, but in foreign policy. He is afraid to touch the insideman, Apparently this is his support and there is no other yet.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 31 October 2015 07: 55 New
      +5
      Quote: indifferent
      I can only say good things about Putin, but in foreign policy. He is afraid to touch the insideman, Apparently this is his support and there is no other yet.

      Plus, you’ve spoken well! Everything is right about Putin’s support, he doesn’t have another and dangerous to wave his saber yet .. hi
      1. arane
        arane 31 October 2015 08: 16 New
        +2
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Quote: indifferent
        I can only say good things about Putin, but in foreign policy. He is afraid to touch the insideman, Apparently this is his support and there is no other yet.

        Plus, you’ve spoken well! Everything is right about Putin’s support, he doesn’t have another and dangerous to wave his saber yet .. hi

        I think that is not so! Putin's support is the people of Russia!
        Here is something else, that which allowed Serdyukov and Vasilyeva to escape punishment, that that allows Chubais not to cut the forest in Kolyma and much more
        1. MIKHAN
          MIKHAN 31 October 2015 08: 26 New
          +3
          Quote: arane
          Here is something else, that which allowed Serdyukov and Vasilyeva to escape punishment, that that allows Chubais not to cut the forest in Kolyma and much more

          Возможно какой то компромат есть..Путин не идеальный человек и держится за счет поддержки народа и Армии (не ожидали от него такого..)Лавирует на "острие лезвия"..спокойно и с юмором!
          1. Uncle Joe
            Uncle Joe 31 October 2015 21: 32 New
            -2
            Quote: MIKHAN
            Perhaps there is some kind of incriminating evidence. Putin is not a perfect person
            Oh, I can’t - it’s not perfect, there is compromising evidence, and is this kind of normal? laughing

            And tell me please - if this is true, if you are right, and there is such incriminating evidence, then:

            1 What kind of compromising material should be so that this not ideal person is not afraid to violate the constitution, is not afraid to pass anti-people laws, is not afraid to let things go to the covert and Serdyukov, but is afraid of the emergence of compromising evidence?

            2 What level of moral degradation should a person have to reach in order for such a compromise to appear?

            3 What goals should be pursued by a person at such a level of moral degradation, a person who has this kind of incriminating evidence, so that despite the availability of incriminating evidence, he can run into the presidency from the United People’s Union and form the government that we have?

            И почему все время упускается из виду, что самые ругаемые и одиозные фигуры росийской власти и околовластных сфер - Миллер, Якунин, Фурсенко, Греф, Кудрин, Медведев, Чубайс и т.д. - в начале 90-х либо были членами кооператива "Озеро", либо worked together with Putin Sobchak’s?
    2. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 October 2015 08: 27 New
      +5
      Quote: indifferent
      Apparently this is his support and there is no other yet.

      like Putin’s native of the KGB, the support of the special services, because it gives some people a good life and the army on the one hand and oil and gas on the other, because, again, control and management of their colleagues, with the help of the former, promotes the interests of the latter, there are auxiliary support in the form of people with money that are close to the body like Timchenko and Rotenberg, and those who agreed to the conditions of their trouble-free existence like Abramovich, who received a public task to build a couple of stadiums at his own expense, but to see the rest is not so simple
    3. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 31 October 2015 09: 00 New
      +7
      Quote: indifferent
      It was possible to go to work under Brezhnev. This was not considered a special offense.


      Я свою трудовую деятельность начинала при Брежневе и что- то не припомню, чтобы можно было на работу выпившим ходить. Тогда в каждом микрорайоне были опорные пункты милиции, штабы ДНД. Для любителей шарахаться выпившим и нарушать покой трудящихся были мед.вытрезвители, а для особо злостных- ЛТП( лечебно- трудовые профилактории). А ещё на предприятиях и в учреждениях были: профком, партком и комитет комсомола, которые следили за " обликом морале" в коллективе.

      But drug addiction, children's beer alcoholism, the problem of free time in children was not. And now they are yelling that the children at school are so loaded that they, the poor, have no time to breathe. When they have time to drink, hang out at night clubs and sit on the Internet for almost days!
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 31 October 2015 09: 33 New
        0
        Quote: B.T.W.
        Then in each microdistrict there were police strongholds, headquarters of the DND

        Patrols, I once thundered completely sober, and I’m not alone
  13. Mitrich76
    Mitrich76 31 October 2015 07: 48 New
    +7
    This is what should be dreamed of in order to write such an article early in the morning ??? belay
    Yes, the people support Putin, understand that his actions are aimed at preserving and strengthening our sovereignty. But there can be no unconditional support in everything. Different people and groups have different interests and goals (the seller wants to sell more expensive, the buyer wants to buy cheaper, for example). The task of the authorities is to maintain a certain balance of interests. Currently, efforts are aimed at making us in the world perceived as a state, not a colony with the Papuans. At the expense of whom, we ourselves see. And while we agree with the price.
    The author of the article goes overboard. Very much. Judging by the article, Putin should have been canonized and approved a moleben. Or am I missing this?
    Истеричка, мечтавшая о "мачо", видимо всю ночь. Посочувствуем.
  14. populist
    populist 31 October 2015 07: 53 New
    +2
    Against the monolith, which is a huge country, unconditionally believing and selflessly loving his hero

    Gorbachev was also initially supported and Yeltsin was elected president in 1990.
    So, Memento mori (political).
  15. Lyapis
    Lyapis 31 October 2015 07: 57 New
    +1
    People are happy with pensions, medicine, opportunities, prospects.

    This is such a joke, right?
    По моему, у Путина такой высокий рейтинг не потому что в стране всё так замечательно (скорей уж наоборот.Чтоб понять это, достаточно просто открыть любой новостной сайт, особенно в разделе "экономика"), а потому что нет ни одной фигуры достаточного масштаба, которая могла бы выступить ему альтернативой. Ну и страх того, что после ухода Путина неизвестно что будет.
  16. dsi
    dsi 31 October 2015 08: 00 New
    -1
    Whether they want it or not, Putin is not just a president, he is a National Leader! And it is a fact!
  17. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 31 October 2015 08: 06 New
    +4
    GDP can be treated differently. It is difficult to challenge the fact that he is a person who will leave a mark in history (Crimea alone would be enough). If grades were given for the work of the president, then I would put the following:
    1. Foreign policy - 5
    2. Domestic policy - 3 (-)
    I don’t take other directions. Therefore, no matter how positive a person is, he always has flaws. Just perfect people do not exist in nature.
    1. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 31 October 2015 08: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Just perfect people do not exist in nature.


      " Если ты хочешь, чтобы твои друзья были без недостатков, значит у тебя никогда не будет друзей."
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 31 October 2015 09: 07 New
        +3
        You're right. But in real life there will always be idealists who do not believe in it and all their lives are looking for something or someone.
  18. Mihail55
    Mihail55 31 October 2015 08: 24 New
    -4
    I liked the article ... a kind of summing up this year. Optimism at this time is urgently needed!
    We look at the past - as then and in our time we tried to present the affairs of the Grand Duke and St. Alexander Nevsky. How much dirt was poured on him, but he still stopped evil from the WEST! This is a fait accompli, not a MYTH!
    I hope the descendants will appreciate all current events and will be rewarded to all according to their deeds ...
  19. Nymp
    Nymp 31 October 2015 08: 25 New
    +4
    These liberalists of all stripes got it, with their theory of exclusivity, and complete superiority over the crazy people! And also with the pro-Western ideal of the world order. These qualities are betrayed by any liberalist or liberaltutku who wrote the article. Really take away your smelly overcoats and go home, only to your real home - a gay-American! We will never call you and do not even hope! Article minus. angry
  20. samarin1969
    samarin1969 31 October 2015 08: 35 New
    +1
    There are successes in GDP. But bought at a high price, especially in foreign policy, Chechnya, the Eurasian Union ...
    Immortal thanks for the Crimea!
  21. Riv
    Riv 31 October 2015 08: 39 New
    +1
    About Ilya Muromets I liked the hint. There, by the way, the prince was still in the cartoon. Kievsky. By the way, was he called not Vladimir? OH SHI ... The author of the article has already left.
  22. Ebundey Mukhryuev
    Ebundey Mukhryuev 31 October 2015 08: 41 New
    +3
    ... and I, unfortunately, did not meet those who were satisfied with their pension, medicine, and much more than ..., but they, like me, do not think that it depends on one, even the President.
    The girl interfered with everything in a heap - bullshit. You don’t even understand on which side the lady? It looks like some kind of provocation.
  23. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 31 October 2015 08: 58 New
    +1
    Статья - это такой тонкий "стеб"! Настолько тонкий, что большинство его не поняли. Оборотная сторона критики "с пеной у рта" всего и вся. Ведь автор на самом деле пытается иронизировать над всеобщей поддержкой ВВП. И советует "уйти в подполье" и просто подождать, помня поговорку - от любви до ненависти - один шаг. А пока не маячить, и дождаться этого шага. ИМХО, дождаться, когда "Нефть рухнет, бюджет рухнет, рубль рухнет - народ голодный на улицы пойдёт..." Зря надеется. Россия пережила начало 90-х и дефолт 98-го, и идиотизм пьяного ЕБНа, и семибанкирщину, и что? Кто скажет, что после прихода ВВП стал жить хуже? Лично я таких не вижу. Вижу, что люди, мечтавшие в 90-х о "жигулях", ездят на иномарках. Вижу, что те, кто хочет работать - находит способ. А кто не хочет - причину. Города становятся чище, дороги - лучше. Телевизоры и прочая "фигня" - у кого её нет? И кто -то реально голодает? Как любят писать наши "незалежные братья". И ведь не докажешь свидомым, что никто в России не голодает, а укропские фальсификат на пальмовом масле - это не "лучшие в мире продукты".
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 October 2015 09: 36 New
      +1
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Вижу, что люди, мечтавшие в 90-х о "жигулях", ездят на иномарках.

      A familiar topic, so they began to drive foreign cars under Yeltsin, especially right-hand drive cars, there was even a report from Moscow as it was then, because they were cheap, and second-hand cars from Germany also began to be transported at the same time
  24. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 31 October 2015 09: 04 New
    0
    Putin is not perfect, but other Russian politicians are just a bunch of traitors and idiots.
    There is no other head in Russia capable of bearing a crown ...
  25. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 31 October 2015 09: 17 New
    +3
    I will not speak about the article; much has already been said above. Personally, I have a plus. But your comments, comrades, and interesting ones come across :) Summarizing the picture, we can say that colleagues criticizing the GDP cannot reasonably explain their hostility. It seems that we are living quite well, and without it it was much worse, and the army raised many more pluses, and they all have minuses, not happiness in them. But they still voiced something like: GDP is a bastard - because a bastard - after all, it is obvious that he is a bastard! As I understand it, this is a normal alpha-male couple of people crawling, they growl at the dominant male because he is bigger, stronger, enjoys great success with sa ... girls :) Hence the conclusion - trying to explain something to such comrades at the level of logic is useless , deep down, they are well aware that at the moment the GDP has no alternative and that the Russians really love and take pride in it. But their alphaego does not allow them to admit it out loud and they are forced to criticize, because thirst is nothing, the image of a tough male is everything!
    Yes, and judging by the rating of the article, alfasamtsov dofiga here!;)
    1. EFA
      EFA 31 October 2015 09: 53 New
      +1
      Мда. Настолько все свести к физиологии, думаю вы не правы, Путина есть за что критиковать и за что любить и "альфа доминирование" тут вообще не причем.

      Статье поставил минус, поскольку не любитель розовых очков, автор скорее "жертва рекламы", или слишком много смотрит телевизор. Критическое мышление (аргументированное) у многих авторов в последнее время находится в глубокой спячке, от чего и появляются такие вот статьи пропитанные сахарной патокой.
  26. akudr48
    akudr48 31 October 2015 09: 37 New
    +2
    В Италии при Муссолини на митингах правящей партии экзальтированные женщины кричали "Хочу ребенка от дуче!". И некоторым это удавалось...

    Now, if you read something similar here, then you could believe in the sincerity of the publication. Because if a woman wants, then she can, unlike men ...

    And so everything resembles a not-so-skilled panegyric to his beloved leader, which he does not need due to his natural modesty.

    The article discredits our everything.
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 October 2015 09: 58 New
      +2
      Quote: akudr48
      "Хочу ребенка от дуче!". И некоторым это удавалось.

      It was like that - Clara Petacci, then hanged with Mussolini, upside down
  27. veksha50
    veksha50 31 October 2015 10: 07 New
    +2
    Hmm ... But the article is ambiguous ...

    After so many praises at the beginning - a paradoxical passage at the end:

    "So rejoicemy dear fellow oppositionist! Take advantage of this respite. As the saying goes, "take your greatcoat, let's go home." Accumulate strength and experience. Watch. Study. Lump of stonethis 90 percent mass of people she will call uswhen he decides that he wants a new Ilya of Murom or Dobrynya Nikitich or Alyosha Popovich. The main thing is not to miss the moment and be ready прийти на помощь. В любом виде"...

    Once again ... hmm ...
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 October 2015 12: 31 New
      +1
      And that article is ambiguous ...
      And you read who this Oksana is and what articles she writes. the opposition is different. One thing I will say to Oksana is a supporter of Navalny Makarevich, Khodorkovsky.
  28. andrejwz
    andrejwz 31 October 2015 10: 09 New
    +1
    Sociologists should have asked a question about supporting the government’s economic policy, rather than focusing on Putin’s personality in connection with his foreign policy. Dumach, that the results would hardly have been so rosy.
    Yes, we unconditionally, 100% trust our president. Yes, we feel behind him, like behind a stone wall. Yes, it gives us a sense of security. Yes, with him we look with confidence to the future.

    Эх, минусуйте, вспомнилось из Наутилуса: "Нищие, нищие молются на// То, что их нищета гарантирована". И Круга: "Я радуюсь, что здесь хоть это то, но есть.
  29. Azitral
    Azitral 31 October 2015 10: 20 New
    +1
    1) Статья не об этом, и в ней нет никакого низкопоклонства перед Путиным. Она о том, что нельзя ничего ругать, и нельзя ничего хвалить "в общем". Жизнь сложна, и что-то запросто может быть хорошо, а что-то - ошибочно. Автор говорит о том, что народ, "в общем" одобрил, но это не значит, что меньшинство - во всем неправо. У нас и оппозиция такая, - раз недовольны, так ВСЕ убрать! Свергнуть, развалить до основания. Не улучшить, не предложить иное решение, (а организационные принципы у нас действительно примитивны и убоги) - а снести! Никакого ВМЕНЯЕМОГО конструктива, перепевы уже исчерпавших себя принципов либерализма, - но разрушить. Поэтому нет у нас нормальной опозиции.
    2) Мы ХРАБРЫ, то есть хорошие ХОРОборы, по природе хорошо можем сражаться в строю, бок о бок, в коллективе, заодно с другими. Это - очень много, это нас спасало много раз и спасает до сих пор: скажите, какой еще народ стал бы несколько лет подряд работать, не получая зарплату? Над нами даже смеялись за это, но мы работали,потому что так было легче, не так страшно, поэтому был хлеб, электричество, отопление, "скорая помощь" - и спасли страну, когда по всем понятиям должны были погибнуть.
    Мы не ОТВАЖНЫ ("отважный", "отвязный", любящий, обученный и умеющий действовать вне строя, в одиночку) поэтому среди русских мало успешных предпринимателей, и поэтому же у нас такое традиционно наглое, склонное к беспределу начальство. Не обижайтесь. Обратитесь к своему опыту: будет вас гнобить начальник, - многие вступятся? Многие осмелятся хотя бы сохранить нормальные отношения? Не перестанут здороваться? Исключения - есть, их не может не быть по определению, и из этого проистекает наш способ преодолевать кризисы и настоящие (1941!) катастрофы. Не больно красивый, корявенький, не вызывающий гордости, но довольно надежный: мы инстинктивно выбираем из своего числа кого-то поотважнее, - и даем ему над собой власть. И - подчиняемся тогда безраздельно. Хорошо, когда этот кто-то - русский. Он, плоть от плоти, понимает что к чему и не льет дуром кровь, потому что на самом деле незачем. Иосиф Виссарионович, вроде бы, знаток человеков, русских до конца не понимал, не жалел, не любил, и поэтому достижения - путем перелома через коленку. Но уже выбрали в вожди. Это не отменяется. В 1999 году бардак надо было прекращать! Любым способом! Срочно! Мы (мы!!! Не кто-то другой, на "Вашингтонский обком"!)отдали власть первому же мало-мальски подходящему человеку. В целом, считаю, нам повезло. Русский из Питера, не представитель малого народа, и даже не украинец. Хорошо образованный, вышколенный, профессионально решительный, - но НАШ. Такого, пожалуй, и не было. Беда только в том, что теперь будем терпеть даже в том случае, если начнет творить явное не то. И не решимся, и механизма нет, не выработали, чтоб ВСЕМИ.
  30. Friends
    Friends 31 October 2015 10: 36 New
    +1
    Quote: Tatar 174
    It seems to me that everything in the article is too optimistic.


    If this is optimism, then I do not understand anything in life.

    Как по мне, это чистая провокация - плачь, в стиле "несистемной жоппозиции". Об этом говорит и "экскурс в историю", проведённый автором... Её "знания" и выводы вполне укладываются в "картину мира" наших "истинных демократов" и "западных друзей".

    Описание нашей современности в том же ключе - всё ужасно, во главе страны стоит гопник, но народ, в массе своей, этого не видит - этакие "путиноиды-зомби"...

    You and I, the dear oppositionist, are horrified that the president in every possible way promotes the gopnic culture, the culture of the streets that he carried through his whole life, gladly translating the science received on these streets into it, and the citizens of the country are touched and proud of it


    Of the twenty citizens I surveyed, only one person found a flaw in the activities of the president and did not keep silent about him. According to the guy from Surgut, who moved to live in Central Russia, in Kostroma, V.V. Putin pays insufficient attention to agriculture. And even worse - he allowed it to almost destroy. The rest expressed one hundred percent support for all his actions and words, without exception.


    "Спасать, из мрака невежества и заблуждений", это "", автор не считает возможным и нужным.

    For whom is something to change? How to change something? Who needs casualties, losses, fighters and the struggle itself, if no one is waiting for change?


    Автор призывает своих идейных братьев и сестёр поберечь силы для "грядущих сражений".

    So rejoice, my dear fellow oppositionist! We take advantage of this respite. As the saying goes, "take your greatcoat, let's go home." Accumulate strength and experience. Watch. Study. A lump of people, this 90 percent mass of people will itself call upon us when it decides that it wants a new Ilya Muromets or Dobrynya Nikitich or Alyosha Popovich. The main thing is not to miss the moment and be ready to help. In any form.


    The information war continues, is gaining momentum and becoming more sophisticated ... It’s too early to relax.
  31. Earnest
    Earnest 31 October 2015 10: 39 New
    0
    Quote: afdjhbn67
    Quote: venaya
    The indignation is caused by figures below, possibly loafers, and possibly worse.

    You force the battered classics back - the king is good, the boyars are unimportant ... yes

    Давайте вернемся к аналогиям с Иосифом Виссарионовичем - Сталина второй раз избрали Генсекретарём ЦК ВКП(б) зимой 1926 г., а окончательно стал бесспорным руководителем СССР в 1932 г. и был у власти 21 год. ВВП пока 15 лет разгребает, в том числе то, что вынужден был "соратникам"в кормление отдавать. Никто же не будет спорить, что Путин не допускает революционных, взрывных изменений? Я как-то не хотел бы революций и майданов, хоть и тяжело смотреть на беспредельную свободу властьимущих. ИМХО - готов оценивать результат работы ВВП после полного окончания его правления. Думаю, на памятник и название его именем пары кораблей и площадей заслуг наберется
    1. Uncle Joe
      Uncle Joe 31 October 2015 21: 52 New
      0
      Quote: Earnest
      Let's get back to the analogies with Joseph Vissarionovich - Stalin was elected Secretary General of the Central Committee of the CPSU (B.) For the second time in the winter of 1926, and finally became the undisputed leader of the USSR in 1932 and was in power for 21 years
      And let’s do without analogies and stupid, untrue statements that Stalin was the undisputed leader of the USSR?

      According to the system of our Constitution, the USSR should not have a sole president, elected by the entire population, on a par with the Supreme Council, and able to oppose the Supreme Council. The collegiate president in the USSR is the Presidium of the Supreme Council, including the chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Council, elected not by the entire population, but by the Supreme Council and accountable to the Supreme Council. The experience of history shows that such a construction of the supreme organs is the most democratic, guaranteeing the country from undesirable accidents.
      I. Stalin T.14 s.144

      GDP has been raking for 15 years
      Privatization, attraction of foreign investments (the essence is the sale of sectors of the economy to foreigners), protection of the interests of big capital, integration into the world economy, reduction of social guarantees and commercialization of medicine with education.

      Yes, he is raking - he is raking the remnants of the USSR working in the interests of the people, which Yeltsin did not have time to rake.
  32. Straight
    Straight 31 October 2015 11: 29 New
    +1
    Не унывай Оксана. Я, бывший оппозиционер одиночка, сегодняшний сторонник Путина. Но меня вчера стошнило от этого назначения сердюкова, а ранее мутило от дела васильевой. А сегодня я просто в ярости от осознания того, что они никогда не защищали народных интересов, просто иногда интересы поганой "элиты" совпадают с народными и мы тогда бываем в восторге. От любви до ненависти один шаг, чем больше надежд, тем больше потом будет ненависти. Неисправимое ворье и мерзавцы и закончат как предыдущая братия закончила в начале 20-го века.
  33. alicante11
    alicante11 31 October 2015 12: 09 New
    +1
    GDP has really done a lot for Russia. To argue with this is stupid. But, at the same time, he did this not for her and not for us. And he did all this for a handful of oligarchs who robbed us in 90. It just really coincided that the interests of the oligarchs at some point intersected with the interests of the motherland. In part, they intersect now. In the field of security and foreign policy. Therefore, we are delighted with the Crimea-nyash, from the Ukrokotl and from the diplomatic maneuvers of Lavrov and Churkin. Therefore, we are proud to read about the actions of our VKS in Syria. But in domestic politics, the interests of the oligarchs are directly opposite to the interests of the country and people. They need a stable economy, and so do we. But here the methods by which they achieve this are completely anti-people. The states of the oligarchs are saved due to a new deterioration in the life of the people.

    Well, this is just a lie.

    People are happy with pensions, medicine, opportunities, prospects.


    Автор явно не попадала в больницы. И не сидела с грудничком в очереди на "годовой осмотр". Также автор явно не сталкивалась с государственными детскими садами. Про пресловутую коррупцию я уже не говорю.

    Of course, when compared with 90, we are all chocolate, but why compare with what is bad?
  34. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 31 October 2015 12: 35 New
    0
    Putin claims that he is liberal in the economy, that is, a supporter of a market economy in its most radical monetarist mode. Okay. supporter. so a supporter. Like the British under Thatcher and the Americans under Reagan allowed to get out of the ass. But as you know, the devil sits in the details. Now it seems that messages have begun to appear that one or the other governor is being seized for corruption. BUT. Undoubtedly, the administration has a PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT in the administration, and I think it’s rather big, so where did they look, recommending this or that person to be nominated, this is the easiest accusation, the other accusation is that our whole throne is so filthy that an honest official not to break through, but Putin’s direct fault is in this. Another thing is that a market economy includes many models - in America it is one, in the EU - another in India and China one more. But for some reason we chose the most caricatured model. All according to Ilf and Petrov. Remember in the city of N. there were so many hairdressers ... that seemed ... I began to count how many hairdressers (sorry beauty salons) in our town with a population of 45 thousand souls. Counted eight. The liberal will object to me - everything is correct, according to the laws of the market, everyone will be eliminated, and his invisible hand will correct everything. But gentlemen, a shitty hand at the market, this means that people spent the money, bought scissors, chypre, nail polish, and then an invisible hand takes them by the scruff and that ... These people will go to Kula, if they could buy scissors, then not without the ability to relearn? Through the ass, it's all gentlemen. It would not be easier to calculate that in our city it is enough to have, say, three establishments, and advise the rest to devote themselves to another matter for which there is a DEMAND.
  35. Altona
    Altona 31 October 2015 13: 06 New
    0

    ---------------------
    Вообще, оппозиционеров не стоит сбрасывать со счетов, таких, как актёр Михаил Ефремов, например...Довольно хлёсткую пародию на Путина он исполнил, используя стихотворение Михалкова, которого тоже жёстко пародирует...Но пародия-это тоже признание своего рода...За рядом моментов, мне понравилось, особенно когда "позвонило Ч.М.О."...На Youtube я на Михалкова посмотрел пародию, на его проект "Едим дома", тоже довольно смешно...
  36. Alekst
    Alekst 31 October 2015 14: 16 New
    +2
    I have not been in Russia since the 90s, but my mother recently went to her sister in the Novgorod region, according to her stories in the village who wants to work, who does not want to work on the land, works in the city, who do not want to work, drink too much, whoever works on the land, according to her feelings, works for ten, unlike the allied times, this is the way about agriculture and endangered villages.
    1. chelovektapok
      chelovektapok 31 October 2015 14: 37 New
      +1
      Алекст, а Вам не рассказыали, как живут в России те, кто хочет ( вынужден) работать? Ну кроме алкашей? У нас много национальная страна. Никто никого не обижает. Главное не насколько ты там "русский" , главное то- что ты умеешь руками делать . Качественно и без грубости по цене. Корейцы, немцы, украинцы, молдаване, русские, мне лично пофиг...Цена и качество- критерий стройки, ремонта. Естественный отбор и без политики. Кто хочет работать, тот работает. Если вы сами в России были последние 15 лет, то в курсе, что кто работает- тот зарабатывает. Алкашами в лицо тыкать, как бы не теперь надо. Работает Россия и зарабатывает, те , кто работают. Халяву от РФ только хохлы ожидают почему-то!...
  37. chelovektapok
    chelovektapok 31 October 2015 14: 28 New
    0
    "Домой" это куда? Где у них "дом"? Нет у них дома. Бомжи на Русской свалке и те их не примут! Нет у них шинели и дома нет! Пайку за трудонорму на лесоповале и то не способны заработать мизерабли подажные!
  38. zyablik.olga
    zyablik.olga 31 October 2015 15: 03 New
    +4
    Quote: Lelek
    Both you and Oksana are absolutely right. Putin is the president (with his advantages and disadvantages), for whom I voted. I do not see any alternatives yet.
    Оксана, Вам "лайк" за статью.

    Few people noticed this, but the author of the article pursued the opposite goal. This is an old psychological trick, when using monstrous exaggeration show the delusional nature of any idea. / view / 222 / everything will be clear at once. The author wanted to provoke indignation with her article, and she did it. IMHO.
    And if you accept your point of view that the author really supports Putin, another question arises, why she emigrated and lives in London (which can also be seen on the proposed link) where she communicated with Russians from different regions, how she can judge adequately about the situation in the country is not living in it, and who is actually the customer of the article?
  39. Friends
    Friends 31 October 2015 16: 20 New
    +2
    Quote: zyablik.olga
    Few people noticed this, but the author of the article pursued the opposite goal. This is an old psychological trick, when using the monstrous exaggeration they show the delusionality of an idea. If you read other articles of the author, which are located at this link: https://openrussia.org/user / view / 222 / everything will immediately become clear. The author wanted to provoke indignation with her article, and she succeeded.


    So.

    In fact, the author resents the fact that the people approve of many of the president’s actions. She is trying to show the groundlessness and inconsistency (from her point of view) of this approval. To do this, he focuses on social problems, realizing that her statement that everyone is happy with pensions, medicine, etc., will cause outrage and denial.

    The information war is in action.
  40. Earnest
    Earnest 31 October 2015 17: 05 New
    +2
    On a nearby branch, forum member Altona snatched out a picture suitable for the topic: