New American ships will go to the artificial islands in the South China Sea

In the zone of artificial islands, built by China in the waters of the South China Sea, the new ships of the US Navy will head.




“We will do it again. We are in international waters at that time and in the place we choose, ”quotes the anonymous representative of the US administration of RIA. "News".

Во вторник Министерство внутренних дел Китая сообщило, что в акваторию Южно-Китайского моря в районе спорных островов Наньша вошел американский эсминец Lassen, не имевший разрешения китайских властей, которые считают эти территории своими. Отмечалось, что китайская сторона «отследила, преследовала и сделала предупреждение» эсминцу ВМС США, а в Вашингтон был направлен решительный протест, так как подобные действия нарушают суверенитет КНР и угрожают его безопасности.

The Pentagon later confirmed the data on the American destroyer in the South China Sea. In addition, US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter noted that similar operations "will be conducted in the coming weeks and months," but did not disclose details.
Photos used:
www.politnavigator.net
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sasha 19871987 28 October 2015 09: 14 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    у орла кишка тонка,красный дракон уже набрал силы... а Americans воевать против ливии или ирака только могут,для баталий с равным противником они слишком трусливые...
    1. barsuk 28 October 2015 09: 19 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      And for me, let America bite with China there, maybe it will leave us alone.
      1. Vladimyrych 28 October 2015 09: 21 New
        • 23
        • 0
        +23
        They will not leave. It is Russia that has mattresses in priority. If they put Russia-China itself will lie.
        1. varov14 28 October 2015 10: 33 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          It is necessary to take an example from China, to stand above the battle. China is too big to trust, and America is too armed. We have the same resources and those natural. That's when we convert them into industrial, economic and human, then you can .....
          1. Talgat 28 October 2015 13: 58 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            There is a lot of talk now - like a wise monkey is standing above the fight, etc.

            In fact, China has no chance - (stand over)

            everything is simple here - how the Volga flows into the Caspian, etc.

            China is growing in such a way - that inevitably becomes a geopolitical adversary of the United States and the West in the 21st century - instead of the USSR

            Not Russia and the CSTO - but China is the main enemy of the United States in the coming years

            Если Россия и строит ЕАЭС - интегрирует Евразию, набирает мощь, то выгадывает Китай - т к одкб и ЕАС и Россия со всеми союзниками - это составная часть его планов. А Вся Евразия его будущий союзник - почему Китай и благосклонно относится к нашей интеграции (чем и надо воспользоваться - пока ветер не поменялся)
            1. Karlovar 28 October 2015 16: 36 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Strongly support your opinion !!!
            2. Karlovar 28 October 2015 16: 51 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Если Китай будет умиротворённо наблюдать как объединённый запад положит на лопатки Россию,то следующей целью запада неибежно будет Китай...Причем,тараном запада в войне против Китая будет использоваться(пользоваться) лежащая на лопатках Россия,а граждане России будут использоваться(пользоваться) в этой войне в качестве дешёвого,как бы не бесплатного, пушечного мяса....И Китай это очень и очень хорошо понимает!!! По аналогии: лежащая на лопатках Украина пользуется западом в качестве тарана против России, а марионеточная прозападная украинская власть мобилизует своих граждан в качестве бесплатного пушечного мяса в войне против России!!!!
              1. Talgat 28 October 2015 21: 06 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                You are absolutely right, dear Karlovar! I forgot to mention it - but I agree

                Принцип - "стоять над схваткой" вообще неприемлем - т к стоящий ничего не выиграет - а потом убьют его - и слава богу Китай это понимает. Очевидно, что союз против США уже есть де - факто - а "де юре " его не оформляют ради пиара и инфо войны - чтобы не дать козыри западу

                The second is also very true - it was Yeltsin’s liberal Russia that should have become the shock fist of the West against China - just like that - as the poor Ukrainians are now using

                Но Украина все таки довольна безобидна - а Россия была бы чудовищем в руках запада и либерастов - т к потенциал России ужасен если вдуматься - даже без ЯО. Плюс несчастный Казахстан - "пристегнутый к России" тысячью лет общей истории и общими народами - вынужден был бы (так не вовремя и так не кстати - т е воевать против КИтая это вообще в генах у степняков - но сейчас реально не время - есть ведь другой враг - пострашнее - ) встать против Китая вместе с "больной на голову " Россией

                То, что к власти в РФ пришли "силовики" и народы России открыли глаза на "запад" и поняли что он враг - а не КИтай - это для Китая ОГРОМНОЕ везение! Китаю просто неслыханно повезло, что у него ШОС и ОДКБ в союзниках

                but in a different scenario, China would have received such a problem in the north, it’s just not good to even imagine that the hostile high-tech Russian block of all countries of Central Asia + Kazakhstan is a tank strike fist and there are no c-300 and Su 30 and Su 35 aircraft technology sales from Russia - and on the ocean, Yaps from the USA are crushing -

                А еще бы как пострадали бы Иран и СИрия - их я думаю вообще бы не стало - разбомбили бы на фиг. КНДР пострадала бы. Боливарианские страны - Китай не "вытянул бы " их в одиночку

                It is very good that we did not sell ourselves to the “bourgeoisie for a barrel of jam" - let there be peace and tranquility in Eurasia - as long as the United States needs to be "friends with China"

                And I’m sure that Xin Qin Ping and his colleagues understand this very well and are glad that the leadership has changed in Russia - and value their happiness - that is, they obviously have no time to "stand above the fray" and play "wise monkeys" - time has passed - China's time is now
                1. Karlovar 29 October 2015 14: 32 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Тоже считаю,что де-факто союз РФ-КНР есть! Но оглашать его де-юре рано ещё,"партнёру" сильно не понравится,начнёт нервничать,истерить,делать резкие движения... А то,что объявился Путин,тоже считаю чудом(не иначе как высшие силы его прислали-да хоть инопланетяне)!!!...Как случилось чудо во Франции,почти полностью оккупированной англосаксами,с явлением народу Жанны ДАрк!!! Тоже считаю,что суверенная(именно суверенная) Россия является спасением и для Казахстана,Средней Азии,Ближнего Востока,Китая,Индии,да и Европы....Это минимум... А Россия с марионеточным проамериканским правлением являла бы для Китая опасность на порядки большую,чем милитаристская Япония в прошлую войну....А сценарий мог быть в итоге таков:Россия в руинах,Казахстан-Средняя Азия в руинах,Китай повержен,Иран уничтожен,Индия на коленях.....Англосаксы на коне,при бонусах,при абсолютной власти,при бабосиках...,как часто было уже в истории...
          2. Karlovar 28 October 2015 16: 34 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Already stood over the battle: Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya .... Well, and how? Left alone ???
        2. Myth 28 October 2015 14: 42 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          But why should he go to bed? They will not touch their factory, but as long as we are there, the dragon shines with scales.
      2. Ivan Ivanovich 28 October 2015 09: 22 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        will not leave ..
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Now we are free 28 October 2015 09: 31 New
        • 22
        • 0
        +22
        The Chinese should apply to the American destroyer - "Naval", the Soviet Navy used it in the Black Sea in 1988. The Americans discouraged the desire to tease the Soviet Navy for a long time ...


        P.S. And all this mess with the "bulling" of Americans to the Chinese (alluvial islands) pursues two goals:
        -USA is tearing up the ass in order to show its "Pacific partners" that only they can protect them from the Chinese dragon, and are not afraid to turn it up (although the US financial scrotum is in the hands of China ...)
        -When the alluvial islands-bases will be put into operation and China will deploy anti-ship missiles, air defense (possibly even S-400 purchased from Russia ...) anti-ship aircraft, it will be too late for Borjomi Yankee and their satellites to drink ...
        1. alicante11 28 October 2015 12: 07 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          P.S. And all this mess with the "bulling" of Americans to the Chinese (alluvial islands) has two goals


          Yes, everything is much simpler - "if we went through and did nothing to us, then the waters are international DE FACTO." And they are international de jure. So the Chinese can wash the islands as much as they like ... anyway, the Yankees or their sixes will exploit them.

          When the alluvial islands-bases will be put into operation and China will deploy anti-ship missiles, air defense systems (possibly even S-400 purchased from Russia ...)


          I wonder how much C-400 is needed to grind all the KR and the air group of at least one AUG? I don’t understand why the Chinese put their horns on these islands for the sake of it, they still won’t be able to keep them, it would be better if they got into a joint venture with Gazprom. Ours could fit in then too. At least some confidence.
          1. bmv04636 28 October 2015 12: 52 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            yes not much and I think the "light elves" will go to an open conflict with China
      5. 222222 28 October 2015 11: 36 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        laughing .
        ..that and all the friendship of the USA with CHINA ..
        ..whole China ... laughing
      6. Sober 28 October 2015 12: 23 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        They certainly do not need a strong China. But Russia will never be left. Destroying Russia is the # 1 mission, once and for all.
        True, only "once" is obtained.
        1. Karlovar 28 October 2015 17: 07 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Here, two in one destroy Russia, automatically destroys China, deprived of supplies of Russian resources, the Russian transport corridor to Europe, which receives an unstable situation at the borders .... It remains only to block China’s sea trade routes ...
    2. figwam 28 October 2015 09: 22 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      the red dragon has already gained strength ...

      And if the dragon begins to mine approaches to its territory.
      1. Denis DV 28 October 2015 09: 27 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        And you won’t determine whose mine the destroyer was craving for - Vietnamese, Singaporean, Chinese laughing Owners on the territory a bit too much. Seven Asian nannies have an American admiral without an eye laughing
      2. hydrox 28 October 2015 09: 37 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: figvam
        the red dragon has already gained strength ...

        And if the dragon begins to mine approaches to its territory.

        Do not start: do not forget that these territories are not assigned by the UN to the territory of China and are considered neutral waters, and China honors its membership in the UN Security Council and will not violate maritime laws "just like that" ...
        1. varov14 28 October 2015 10: 57 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          You have the logic of a frightened layman, which is based on the logic of double standards, and for a frightened one, nothing is possible and everything is according to the rules, for the west everything is possible, but not for everyone. Moreover, this very logic is directed against the layman and to a global reduction in his number. Then, as a simple layman, I turn on the third logic - the logic of the Trojan horse, not only everything is possible, but also absolutely necessary. Let's say mining is necessary, in advance, impossible to detect, tuned to the final "consumer" to send it to hell at hour X and along the entire coast of the states or any other "friendly" state and so on.
      3. alicante11 28 October 2015 12: 09 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And if the dragon begins to mine approaches to its territory.


        И сразу станет угрозой почище России, ИГИЛ и ЭБолы вместе взятых, нерукопожатным и вообще будет назначен алькаидой. А, может быть, и огребет по ушам, Americans, наверное, только этого и ожидают, чтобы войнушку замутить.
    3. 740
      740 28 October 2015 09: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Funny of course. The Celestial Fleet doesn’t even lie close with the mattress.
      1. Karlovar 28 October 2015 17: 10 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Offshore assistants are not only the fleet, but also aviation, ground-based missiles ....
    4. hydrox 28 October 2015 09: 32 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Sasha 19871987
      -cheap fiction and provocation ...

      Any provocation has its purpose and task: Lassen fulfilled his mission by “slamming” on Chinese warnings - and in vain they did this only by increasing China’s aggressiveness and precisely when the CPC Central Committee session is taking place in Beijing, the result may be negative for the United States.
      Each such event will push China to conclude a military agreement between Russia and China, while for the time being, we and the PRC are only business partners.
      And if until China gets involved in a ground operation in Syria, then such provocations can push him to this.
      1. Karlovar 28 October 2015 17: 15 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Время для провокации несомненно специально выбрано! Если учесть,что Китай намывает острова уже почти полтора года,наклав на американские предупреждения! Кроме сессии ЦК КПК до конца года намечается открытие шанхайской нефтяной юаневой биржи(под российскую,иранскую,как минимум,нефть)...
    5. Starover_Z 28 October 2015 09: 39 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      “We will do it again. We are in international waters at that time and in the place that we choose, ”quoted an anonymous representative of the American administration of RIA Novosti.

      Insolence is the second happiness, there are no other words!
      Americans по всему миру ведут себя как банда малолетних хулиганов !
      Until they get well on the pumpkin, they will not calm down!
      Something does not fit their 6th fleet to the shores of Syria and do not "extinguish" the ISIS Tomahawks!
      1. DenZ 28 October 2015 10: 06 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        This is not even arrogance - it’s arrogance and permissiveness brought up by Hollywood. And you are right until you get a "pumpkin" and calm down.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    6. Finches 28 October 2015 09: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      "You should not pull the sleeping tiger by the mustache - it is difficult to guess in what mood it will be if it wakes up ..."
    7. Altona 28 October 2015 11: 00 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Sasha 19871987
      the eagle’s gut is thin, the red dragon has already gained strength ...

      ------------------------
      Yesterday, on the channel, the story watched a program about Ancient Rome, and the narrator was an American military, like a general ... And he talked about Carthage, about the fact that Hannibal got Rome with his sorties and landings, having won several bridgeheads, but Rome had no fleet ... And the Romans, having captured the Carthaginian ship, studied it, copied and built a whole fleet ... Then they developed a new tactic of naval battle, not firing from afar, but boldly approaching and boarding the enemy ship ... Then the Romans landed in Africa attacked Hannibal, defeated his empire and army, and forced him to flee, and in the end he committed suicide by taking poison with wine ... In general, the history of Rome is so instructive that it contains examples that can safely be used as analogies ... In general, the US is now pursuing Hannibal's stupid tactics, hitting China over nothing and provoking it into a direct clash ...
      1. Karlovar 28 October 2015 17: 26 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Более того,после перехода Ганнибала через Альпы в Италию Рим находился на краю гибели!!! Ганнибал что-то около 15 лет гонял римские войска на их же территории!!! Ганнибала Барку-а он несомненно был гениальным воителем-сгубила излишняя самоуверенность и идеализм-он искренне ждал,что почти поверженный Рим должен выслать посольство с капитуляцией(по его понятиям правил войны)....Время было потеряно,Рим сконцетрировался....Результат-Карфаген должен быть разрушен-сказал Сципион...и разрушил... Правда,спустя века Рим сам попал в такую же ситуацию с таким же результатом...
    8. alicante11 28 October 2015 12: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      the eagle’s gut is thin, the red dragon has already gained strength ... and the Americans can only fight against Libya or Iraq, for fights with an equal opponent they are too cowardly ...


      Я вас умоляю. У кого кишка тонка? Americans влезли в запретную зону, как к себе домой. Прогулялись там и умотались восвояси. Вон, завтра придут уже большей кодлой. А китайцы что "отследили"? То бишь - утерлись. Какой это дракон? Максимум Горыныч - карифан Добрыни Никитича.
    9. Sober 28 October 2015 12: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Calibrate!
  2. Imperialkolorad 28 October 2015 09: 16 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    So on the islets on the islets of China and up to America itself will get.
    1. Misha Honest 28 October 2015 09: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: ImperialKolorad
      So on the islets on the islets of China and up to America itself will get.

      And why on the islands, if through Alaska closer and safer?)
  3. Decathlon 28 October 2015 09: 16 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    "... We are in international waters at that time and in the place we choose ..."
    Well, then go in the ass with your "fears", "concerns" and "warnings"! WE are also where we choose: on earth, on water and in heaven! In an international sense, of course ... repeat
    1. Leviton 28 October 2015 09: 19 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Decathlon
      "... We are in international waters at that time and in the place we choose ..."
      repeat

      Very reminiscent of the story of Zadornov about the Spanish lighthouse and the US aircraft carrier .....
  4. silberwolf88 28 October 2015 09: 21 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Another US provocation ... nothing new ... the main thing is how China will behave in this situation ... you need to strictly and calmly displace the American destroyer into neutral waters with a group of ships ... you can later declare mining straits around the island (well, no one doesn’t turn up with a check) ... yes, something else can be done ... let's look at the development of the situation
    1. Socialism 2.0 28 October 2015 09: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      China is so careful that it turns into a coward. He will do nothing, except that he will give a thousandth Chinese warning.
      1. aleksfill 28 October 2015 10: 14 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quite right: History knows thousands of LAST Chinese warnings ....
      2. Karlovar 28 October 2015 17: 32 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And who blew up an American military base in Okinawa a couple of months ago ??? In response to the undermining of the Tianjin seaport ...
  5. Ivan Ivanovich 28 October 2015 09: 22 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    American clowns, it seems their song is almost sung
  6. Vladimir 1964 28 October 2015 09: 23 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “We will do it again. We are in international waters at that time and in the place that we choose, ”quoted an anonymous representative of the American administration of RIA Novosti.


    I wonder how this gig of Americans with the Chinese will end. what
  7. Wedmak 28 October 2015 09: 27 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Nuuu .. have come .... and what's next? Will you look at these islands? Or shovels in your hands and pluck them into the ocean?
    We will do it again.

    It sounds like this is a heroic act that takes a lot of energy, time and life. Ugh ...
    1. Karlovar 28 October 2015 17: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And it will be like this: the Yankees will circulate around the island for a long time, the Chinese will send protest notes for a long time and continue to equip the islands, bring in equipment, personnel ....
  8. iliitchitch 28 October 2015 09: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Sasha 19871987
    у орла кишка тонка,красный дракон уже набрал силы... а Americans воевать против ливии или ирака только могут,для баталий с равным противником они слишком трусливые... а эти дешевые провокации с подплытием к китайским островам "бравого американского флота"-дешевая фикция и провокация...


    But interestingly, the professor didn’t have an American passport hour?
  9. vladnn2015 28 October 2015 09: 31 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    And if the dragon begins to mine approaches to its territory.

    Setting minefields is a very good solution! wink
  10. maikl50jrij 28 October 2015 09: 31 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Что бы нам досадить, они будут Китай теребить... Китайцы отгородили себе зону, которую Americans собирались "приватизировать", для этого и были приняты морские соглашения пользования открытыми водами... Правильно мы сделали в свое время, таким образом, что державы признали Охотское море нашим. Иначе они и тут бы уже на рейде стояли!
    1. adept666 28 October 2015 10: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      We did right in due time, in such a way that the powers recognized the Sea of ​​Okhotsk as ours.
      Not the whole sea, but only the territorial, part of the open sea can be considered conditionally beyond the Russian Federation, since our shelf is ours, but the waters are international, so everyone can swim there. Another thing is the entry into this section of the open sea is possible only from Japan to the USA, therefore it is conditionally closed for the USA, but if they want to sail and hang out in a narrow section, they can legally do so.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. sergej30003 28 October 2015 09: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    американская бравада, хотят дать понять, кто в мире хозяин, надеюсь Красный дракон, вышлет свой флот и от слов перейдет к делу, с каждым надо говорить на том языке, на котором разговаривают с тобой, а Americans понимают только силу, Китай самый крупный держатель ценных бумаг Вашингтона, может обвалить экономику, как это стараются сделать Americans with Russia
    1. Karlovar 28 October 2015 17: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The Americans are trying so sideways to raise their falling rating ... With Cook in the Black Sea failed to raise the rating (the effect is opposite), in Syria did not succeed in raising the rating (the effect is opposite) .... Now they are trying to fortune the islands .., hope for the fact that China, unlike Russia, has trade with the United States in the region of 500 billions, like China is dependent on exports to the United States, although the dependence is mutual (the importer is also dependent), and it is still unknown who is more dependent ....
  13. Yun Klob 28 October 2015 09: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: vladnn2015
    And if the dragon begins to mine approaches to its territory.

    Setting minefields is a very good solution! wink


    Or maybe stumble upon a mine from the second (or even the first) world war.
  14. Lelek 28 October 2015 09: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “We will do it again. We are in international waters at that time and in the place we choose. ”

    Interestingly, has China officially announced the N-mile zone on these islands? If not announced, then the Americans will brazenly ply there and legally not harm them. This is not the first time John Richardson has declared "American interests" in the area. what
  15. Old26 28 October 2015 09: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Decathlon
    "... We are in international waters at that time and in the place we choose ..."

    By and large, the Americans are somewhat right. When there are 6 applicants and no one can establish full control - in fact it is a draw, neutral (international) water.

    Quote: Now we are free
    When the alluvial islands-bases will be put into operation and China will deploy anti-ship missiles, anti-aircraft defense (possibly even S-400 purchased from Russia ...) anti-ship aircraft, it will be too late to drink Borjomi Yankees and their satellites ...

    What are alluvial island bases?
    What kind of anti-ship missiles or air defense in the form of S-400?
    What anti-ship aircraft?

    Several platforms that are currently installed there - that's all the "alluvial, artificial islands." There are all these islands there FOUR airdrome, with 6 applicants for each island.

    Entire archipelago, and this more than 100 islets, reefs, etc. has a total area FIVE SQUARE KILOMETERS. And everyone is trying to introduce their own territorial waters there, which are blocked by the territorial waters of another state ...

    In general, nothing will happen. The Americans will go there as many times as they want. The Chinese will give out "the next five thousand nine hundred and ninety-ninth Chinese warning" and it's over
  16. Vita vko 28 October 2015 09: 48 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    From a legal point of view, the confrontation between the United States and China is completely hopeless. After all, the United States does not have questions about the artificial islands of the UAE, similar to the plans for creating islands in Australia. From a military point of view, sending ships to the islands on which the coastal defense systems are located is simply suicide. The only option left is a provocation. For example, mine approaches and then send some sort of cruise ship there with the citizens of their NATO allies, as is customary in the "best traditions" of the CIA.
  17. cniza 28 October 2015 10: 02 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
    American clowns, it seems their song is almost sung


    But do not forget the wounded beast is even more dangerous, and they have many hot heads.
  18. uhu189 28 October 2015 10: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And if the Chinese throw mines in the zone of artificial islands? Not even a lot, most importantly demonstratively? After this, will the US Navy destroyers also swim where they want?
  19. Watson J. 28 October 2015 10: 06 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Молодцы! Хватит прохлаждаться! Пора показать китайцам Кузькину мать! А то расслабились айфоны копировать! Пора переводить экономику на военные рельсы и учиться у КНДР. Нынешняя модель всё равно неправильная, заработанную зелень девать-то некуда, разве что начинать те же USA развивать ради собственной опасности. Пора дракону просыпаться уже.
  20. cniza 28 October 2015 10: 06 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Vita VKO
    For example, mine approaches and then send some sort of cruise ship there with the citizens of their NATO allies, as is customary in the "best traditions" of the CIA.



    They will go to this without blinking, I think China understands this.
  21. becks 28 October 2015 10: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    АЗОХН-ВЕЙ!!!! во-как !!! * Мы сделаем это снова, и в том месте* Это как в Крыму ??? lol eights, and a change of diapers !!! yes With these horror stories, they scare everyone !!!! In the hope that a ride !!!
  22. provincial 28 October 2015 10: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It will be like this all the time until the whole world is fed to the Americans. I think after that they will calm down.
  23. Dan Slav 28 October 2015 10: 32 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    We look and do not climb!
    You should at least enjoy the sight of a broken muzzle of either a Yankee or a chinaman.
    Otherwise, it is worth washing the braid to Alaska, remembering how much we gave it, sold it. ))) Maybe a ride with the Crimea? )
    Although, of course, where are the islands, and where are China and the USA?
    I would like the Africans to get in the face, but with China we have a land border. And no matter how we ourselves get in the breath! (
  24. chunga-changa 28 October 2015 10: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yesterday, an American destroyer marched near the "island" and the warships of the Chinese, they pretended that nothing was happening, the Chinese Foreign Ministry "expressed concern." Here is the continuation.
  25. atamankko 28 October 2015 10: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Stripes are trying hard to fix their tarnished reputation, but it will not work.
  26. Dimon-chik-79 28 October 2015 10: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is a check for lice!
  27. Nyrobsky 28 October 2015 10: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Наверное в этот раз, в силу скудоумия матрасных аналитиков и отсутствия способности реально просчитать последствия своей наглости, матрасам удастся раздраконить дракона.
    With a needle in Syria they got rid of, now for a complete loss of image it is necessary to mattresses and in the South China Sea to lower
  28. Corsair0304 28 October 2015 10: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “We will do it again. We are in international waters at that time and in the place we choose. ”

    Something they don’t choose, for example, the North Atlantic or the Indian Ocean .... On these alluvial islands that are smeared with honey or pen. Dos decided in this way to show japam how cool their allies are (three times “Ha”! Remember the story of the gang rape of pestilence. by the infantry from the base in Okinawa of a minor girl, as well as the fact that the marines did not have anything for it, only a relocation to another base). Can we want the Chinese to show Kuskin’s mother? So one or two or three destroyers is somehow liquid ... Now, if the 6th and 7th flo-o-o-o-oh yes with means of amplification like "Iowa" or "Missouri" then yes Well, maybe the Chinese were thoughtful. And then - they scared the hedgehog with a bare ass.

    We take beer, fish, sit back and wait for the development of events))
  29. Gray 43 28 October 2015 10: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All the same, China will not be able to keep up the confrontation all the time, now it will have to do something with its own hands when the situation comes to your borders
  30. Gray 43 28 October 2015 10: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    All the same, China will not be able to keep up the confrontation all the time, now it will have to do something with its own hands when the situation comes to your borders
  31. 33 Watcher 28 October 2015 11: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, the Americans cannot just live, they need to provoke someone all the time.
  32. tinibar 28 October 2015 11: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    [quote = 740] It's ridiculous of course. The Celestial Fleet doesn’t even lie close with the mattress. [/ quС Apparently, the way it is. And this despite the increasing number of ships included in the Chinese Navy, quite large and modern. But our Navy is still interrupted mainly by old people of the Soviet era and infrequent new clothes of rank 2 and 3, and it solves the problems real and quite effective (in the case of a missile salvo from the Caspian, it’s even spectacular!). Indeed, ships, in any quantity, are not a fleet yet!
  33. question 28 October 2015 11: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, they have passed, and they have passed, along the border the clouds go gloomy! So, made out. They climbed into territorial waters, that's the main thing!
  34. oleggun 28 October 2015 11: 17 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    But why does China send them ships to them ??? Take them in the ring with your destroyers.
  35. ML-334 28 October 2015 11: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Without Russia, there’s no one to call China, sitting on a tree and waiting for the enemies to weaken doesn’t earn authority, you won’t show yourself. I already said that the army needs to be run in, along with Russia, at least in Iraq they helped us with the IG. After that, not one the destroyer would not dare to invade. And so one shaking of the air, gentlemen, the Chinese.
  36. Buffalo 28 October 2015 11: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Chinese in such cases say: paper tiger!
    The same as in the Black Sea, the Yankees there regularly wipe themselves out, but they cannot do anything. The state of their economy does not allow, as before, for example, off the coast of Libya, to adjust the fleet and strike. China is not Libya!
    Having hit, the Yankees will not collect bones.
  37. AlexTires 28 October 2015 13: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Suicide nation. Who will be in a sober mind and sound memory connected with present China? The Americans woke up the bear, and now they also started to wake the dragon.
  38. Old26 28 October 2015 19: 43 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Quote: Vita VKO
    From a military point of view, sending ships to the islands on which the coastal defense systems are located is simply suicide.

    That's just where they come from. Yesterday or the day before yesterday showed these islands on TV. 4 or 5 platforms, such as drilling, with structures on them ... And no coastal defense systems ... God forbid that there were people living there for a long time ...
  39. Old26 29 October 2015 08: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: uhu189
    And if the Chinese throw mines in the zone of artificial islands? Not even a lot, most importantly demonstratively? After this, will the US Navy destroyers also swim where they want?

    There are so many applicants for these islands that even the UN cannot understand them. And the mining of the area that you do not control - it smacks of piracy