White House: Washington is not going to delay the operation against the IG

38
The US administration will not delay operations against extremists in Iraq and Syria, reports RIA News White House spokesman Eric Schulz.

Aleppo, October 6 2015

"We are not going to make a long operation", - said Schulz, recalling that "Barack Obama has already spoken about this many times."

In turn, the head of the Pentagon Ashton Carter at a hearing in the Senate promised lawmakers to more actively support the Syrian opposition and did not rule out a ground operation against terrorists.

"We will not refrain from ... carrying out missions directly, whether they are air strikes or direct actions on the ground."- he said to the senators.

According to him, the Pentagon will strengthen the air strikes on the positions of the IG in Syria. In addition, the defense ministry "is again considering the possibility of deploying American troops (in Iraq) closer to the front line."
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    28 October 2015 09: 05
    Yes, everyone sees your "successes" in the fight against IS, or rather their support with weapons and money
    1. +7
      28 October 2015 09: 10
      And it was "operation ??? ....... laughing
      1. +3
        28 October 2015 09: 18
        they say one thing, practice shows another, the other day they threw off the weapons of the "moderate opposition" only the guys, find 10 differences between the fighter of the "moderate opposition" and the Ishilovite - the answer, they are the same ... yes, hypocrisy is a distinctive feature of the Anglo-Saxons ...
      2. +2
        28 October 2015 09: 24
        Exactly. Since 2011, rolling snot from nostril to nostril and puffing out your cheeks - this is such a subtle "Operation". laughing
        The truth behind this "operation" is another real operation. On the creation of the belt, there is no stability but we will miss it ...
        1. +3
          28 October 2015 09: 48
          Yes, as always, everything will come down to the fact that the Americans, seeing that we are winning, will run to chop off at least part of the territory for themselves so as not to completely lose their influence on the region! So it was in 1944 with the landing in Normandy, so it will be now! Our need to work out the response in case of occupation of part of Syria by mattresses! If they send in troops, then just like that they will not withdraw them! So what needs to be done so that the introduction of troops is simply not possible!
          1. +3
            28 October 2015 10: 18
            Quote: Varyag_1973
            So what needs to be done so that the introduction of troops is simply not possible!



            That's the whole problem - HOW and WHAT to do ???

            Without our help, the Syrian troops simply cannot resist this gang, and if the US-NATO troops officially enter the territory, we can’t do anything, since any step will entail a direct clash with NATO ...

            Otherwise, they can’t be smoked by anything ... The territory on which the soldier’s foot set is considered the conquered territory ...
            1. 0
              28 October 2015 10: 32
              Quote: veksha50
              and if officially US-NATO troops enter the territory
              “I don’t quite understand how they will do it.”
              Landing their warriors deep in Iraq is not a problem. But delivering them to the point of contact is a problem.

              Because Americans will not be forgiven for losses and Obama is unlikely to do so. Nafig him at the curtain still spitting in the back. He and so all and sundry pour mud.

              Because all this is still a talking room. They won’t do anything until the new president. But balabolit - as much as you like.
              1. 0
                29 October 2015 15: 40
                iConst

                In addition to what you said, there are also restrictions in Syria on the use of airspace.

                The GDP warned that it closed the skies over Syria for aviation in all countries. And before someone is going to fly there, this issue should be discussed in advance.

                So, I doubt that the Americans will be allowed to do something there.
      3. +2
        28 October 2015 09: 28
        Quote: Finches
        And it was "operation ???.
        - And they, what else did ISIS bomb? laughing

        And we thought ... laughing
      4. 0
        28 October 2015 12: 41
        Quote: Finches
        And it was "operation ??? ....... laughing

        It was of course. But not the one they were talking about. If they collapse it all will be easier.
    2. 0
      28 October 2015 09: 16
      I wonder how the Yankees will explain the loss of US ground forces during the election campaign, even if in Iraq?
      I think that they will not go to Syria, because for this it will be necessary to agree on this with Putin - and our aviation does not care who to bomb on targets set by ALL types of reconnaissance, nobody canceled "friendly fire" ...
      No, the US ground operation should not happen.
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 09: 36
        They themselves are not going to. They want the Kurds to use cannon fodder. And already on them with sea mattresses on sticks go sea animals.
      2. 0
        28 October 2015 10: 21
        Quote: hydrox
        our aircraft do not care whom to bomb



        The dust storm season is beginning ... What aviation actions are you talking about ??? Turn on the mind ...

        Neither Putin nor Assad are God or his viceroy on Earth in order to also rule nature ...

        And when these dust storms begin, the winner will be the one who will promptly and skillfully "hurry up" precisely in ground operations ...

        For this reason, spirits now need to be soaked with might and main Ivanovo, under the root, where they are only spotted ...
        1. 0
          29 October 2015 16: 18
          veksha

          The dust storm season begins closer to spring.
    3. 0
      28 October 2015 09: 24
      Well, again: a meeting on the Elbe, zones of occupation, the Berlin Wall ... further on in a familiar scenario. what
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 09: 41
        Quote: marlin1203
        Well, again: a meeting on the Elbe, zones of occupation, the Berlin Wall ... further on in a familiar scenario.

        Well, I hope Assad does not think about cyanide .... laughing
        1. 0
          28 October 2015 10: 00
          no))) Abobamka should think, not Assad
    4. 0
      28 October 2015 09: 50
      In addition, the military department "is again considering the possibility of deploying US troops (in Iraq) closer to the front line."

      And there will be a second front line - local troops will be barrage detachments for the Americans so that they will not be offended by terrorists!
      And if the locals run intensively, the Americans will rush in front of them, without loss!
  2. +3
    28 October 2015 09: 05
    “We are not going to have a long operation,” we will tighten our tails and roll off in our own way! wassat
    1. +5
      28 October 2015 09: 08
      They are not going to prolong the operation, they are going to prolong it
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 09: 18
        Quote: svetoruss
        They are not going to prolong the operation, they are going to prolong it

        Only with money and weapons, but what if the skilled manpower of the IS decreases daily (there, they will even be relocated to Yemen)?
        Does this mean that the IG is still blown away?
        1. 0
          28 October 2015 09: 29
          You yourself answered your question, didn’t leave in Syria, but relocated. They want to save the backbone ...
        2. 0
          28 October 2015 10: 32
          Quote: hydrox
          IS manpower decreases daily (out, even in Yemen they will be relocated)?
          Does this mean that IG is still blown away?



          The IG is not blown away, it is saved ... Yesterday, the Turks took 500 fighters from Yemen to the territory with four planes ...

          PS Thanks to such "rescuers", the problem of war on a global scale will not be solved for a long time ...
          1. 0
            28 October 2015 12: 34
            He is not blown away, they pump him up.
  3. 0
    28 October 2015 09: 05
    “We will not refrain from ... conducting missions directly, whether it be air strikes or direct actions on the ground,” he told senators.


    Only after approval by Syria (Russia) :)
    In all cases, the mattresses will want to close the sky over Syria.
    Otherwise, they will be scared.
    Ugh ...
    Even writing is disgusting
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 09: 23
      Quote: Alcoholic
      In all cases, the mattresses will want to close the sky over Syria.

      But Russia will not allow them to do this, because it will mean our defeat. In addition, "closing the sky" can be done in two ways: anti-aircraft (depriving the ability to move freely) and electronic warfare (depriving the ability to navigate and use the means of aiming weapons at the target).
      And if the first method is not always acceptable, then for the second method we have almost unlimited possibilities.
      1. +1
        28 October 2015 10: 34
        Quote: hydrox
        "closing the sky" can be done in two ways: anti-aircraft (depriving the ability to move freely) and electronic warfare (depriving the ability to navigate and use the means of aiming weapons at the target).



        Guys, don't rack your brains ... Soon God or Allah, or rather Her Majesty Nature, will itself close the sky over Syria for the planes of both Russia and the "coalition" ...
    2. 0
      29 October 2015 16: 22
      Alcoholic

      Do not take to heart.

      In peacetime, so as not to mess around, there is always work on drawing up plans for an attack or defense. So to speak, development.

      Maybe that "bird talker" blurted out something to journalists. They did not understand, and where possible, they thought of it. So it's all chatter.
  4. +2
    28 October 2015 09: 07
    They do not drag out, but quickly destroy, only 4 years. Hot Estonian guys were envious of such speed, and Finnish too. laughing
  5. +3
    28 October 2015 09: 09
    "Washington is not going to delay the operation against IS"
    He is not going to curtail her either. Everything is being withdrawn and withdrawn from Afghanistan, it is wonderful to go.
  6. +1
    28 October 2015 09: 10
    I hope that soon "our Western partners" will overstrain ...
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 09: 29
      Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
      I hope that soon "our Western partners" will overstrain ...

      It is very similar while candles help, but only the proctologist can remove the main consequences of the clinic.
  7. +1
    28 October 2015 09: 14
    Four years are no longer dragging out if the USSR had fought a war like this with Germany so far. Russia does not like to chew snot like that, it fights quickly and effectively, simply because the war is expensive and painful. We remember the price we were given the VICTORY VICTORY, and the Americans never fought.
  8. 0
    28 October 2015 09: 21
    It seems that Washington will use its armed forces as a detachment, chasing ISIS into battle against the Syrians from Iraq. And the supply routes to ISIS will be reduced, they will be immediately transferred to the Syrian-Iraqi border. In general, they organize logistics to support and maintain terrorists in the Middle East hi
  9. 0
    28 October 2015 09: 27
    We will conduct a ground operation in support of the IS .... emmm against ISIS in Syria and Iraq
  10. 0
    28 October 2015 09: 31
    They will clean all their contacts in ISIS. If they can, of course.
  11. 0
    28 October 2015 10: 09
    In short, they will carry out an operation to evacuate the unfinished Ishilovites, under the guise of the American contingent.
    Like, Keifor in a new role - in Yugoslavia, the interests of the Albanian thugs were protected, and the Ishilovites in Syria.
  12. +2
    28 October 2015 10: 13
    Quote: Finches
    And it was "operation ??? ....... laughing



    According to their concepts, yes, the trouble is that Congress allocates little money. wink
  13. 0
    28 October 2015 10: 14
    "more actively support the Syrian opposition and did not rule out ground operations against terrorists "...

    The season of dust storms is coming ... Aviation will be chained ...

    If the Amers begin a ground-based land operation under the guise of fighting IS, then this will be for the Syrians and for our not comme il faut ...

    Does it provoke Russia, by its chatter, to include our ground forces in battles ???

    Previously, they had a goal - to redirect the tip of the IS strike from the USA towards Russia ... In practice, they almost succeeded ...

    Now their goal number 1 is to drive Russia into the conditions of Afghanistan-2 ...

    This cannot be allowed, but I can’t even imagine what to do ... One hope is that Putin and his team will have the wisdom and cunning to get out of this wild situation ...
  14. +2
    28 October 2015 10: 16
    Quote: svetoruss
    They are not going to prolong the operation, they are going to prolong it



    To infinity wassat They need a pump for pumping attendants.
  15. 0
    28 October 2015 10: 43
    Question to Ashton Carter: Why the hell did the Americans bomb ISIS for a year? Where did the US Air Force take its bombs and missiles, which made thousands of "combat" missions during the specified period? Probably played darts among themselves. Yankees, those fruits! They say one thing, do another, plan a third. To listen to them, they will take the whole World in one fell swoop. As the Russian satirist M. Zadornov says: the Americans are the chief executives of the planet Earth. They are the main ones everywhere and everywhere their nose is visible. It's time for them to calm down already!
  16. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 01
    “We will not refrain from ... conducting missions directly, be it air strikes or direct actions on the ground,” he told senators

    Looks, not all hospitals have bombed yet
  17. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 15
    Pind .. they will send their troops and cover the IS bases from air strikes
  18. 0
    28 October 2015 13: 57
    And so already tightened nowhere.