White House: Washington is not going to delay the operation against the IG

The US administration will not delay operations against extremists in Iraq and Syria, reports RIA News White House spokesman Eric Schulz.


Aleppo, October 6 2015

"We are not going to make a long operation", - said Schulz, recalling that "Barack Obama has already spoken about this many times."

In turn, the head of the Pentagon Ashton Carter at a hearing in the Senate promised lawmakers to more actively support the Syrian opposition and did not rule out a ground operation against terrorists.

"We will not refrain from ... carrying out missions directly, whether they are air strikes or direct actions on the ground."- he said to the senators.

According to him, the Pentagon will strengthen the air strikes on the positions of the IG in Syria. In addition, the defense ministry "is again considering the possibility of deploying American troops (in Iraq) closer to the front line."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. valday 28 October 2015 09: 05 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Yes, yes, everyone sees your "successes" in the fight against IS, or rather their support with weapons and money
    1. Finches 28 October 2015 09: 10 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      And it was an "operation ??? ....... laughing
      1. Sasha 19871987 28 October 2015 09: 18 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        they say one thing, practice shows another, the other day, they threw off the weapons of the "moderate opposition" only guys, find 10 differences between the fighter of the "moderate opposition" and the Igilov’s answer, they are the same ... yes, hypocrisy is the hallmark of the Anglo-Saxons ...
      2. Vladimyrych 28 October 2015 09: 24 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Exactly. Since 2011, rolling snot from nostril to nostril and inflating cheeks - this is such a slender “Operation”. laughing
        The truth behind this "operation" is another real operation. To create a belt is not stability, but we will miss it ...
        1. Varyag_1973 28 October 2015 09: 48 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Yes, as always, everything will come down to the fact that the Americans, seeing that we are winning, will run to chop off at least part of the territory for themselves so as not to completely lose their influence on the region! So it was in 1944 with the landing in Normandy, so it will be now! Our need to work out the response in case of occupation of part of Syria by mattresses! If they send in troops, then just like that they will not withdraw them! So what needs to be done so that the introduction of troops is simply not possible!
          1. veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 18 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Varyag_1973
            So what needs to be done so that the introduction of troops is simply not possible!



            That's the whole problem - HOW and WHAT to do ???

            Without our help, the Syrian troops simply cannot resist this gang, and if the US-NATO troops officially enter the territory, we can’t do anything, since any step will entail a direct clash with NATO ...

            Otherwise, they can’t be smoked by anything ... The territory on which the soldier’s foot set is considered the conquered territory ...
            1. iConst 28 October 2015 10: 32 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: veksha50
              and if officially US-NATO troops enter the territory
              “I don’t quite understand how they will do it.”
              Landing their warriors deep in Iraq is not a problem. But delivering them to the point of contact is a problem.

              Because Americans will not be forgiven for losses and Obama is unlikely to do so. Nafig him at the curtain still spitting in the back. He and so all and sundry pour mud.

              Because all this is still a talking room. They won’t do anything until the new president. But balabolit - as much as you like.
              1. gladcu2 29 October 2015 15: 40 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                iConst

                In addition to what you said, there are also restrictions in Syria on the use of airspace.

                The GDP warned that it closed the skies over Syria for aviation in all countries. And before someone is going to fly there, this issue should be discussed in advance.

                So, I doubt that the Americans will be allowed to do something there.
      3. iConst 28 October 2015 09: 28 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Finches
        And it was an "operation ???.
        - And they, what else did ISIS bomb? laughing

        And we thought ... laughing
      4. Geisenberg 28 October 2015 12: 41 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Finches
        And it was an "operation ??? ....... laughing

        It was of course. But not the one they were talking about. If they collapse it all will be easier.
    2. hydrox 28 October 2015 09: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I wonder how the Yankees will explain the loss of US ground forces during the election campaign, even if in Iraq?
      I think that they will not go into Syria, because for this it will be necessary to agree on this with Putin - but our aviation does not care who canceled according to the goals set by ALL types of intelligence, because nobody canceled their own ...
      No, the US ground operation should not happen.
      1. Angro Magno 28 October 2015 09: 36 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        They themselves are not going to. They want the Kurds to use cannon fodder. And already on them with sea mattresses on sticks go sea animals.
      2. veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 21 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: hydrox
        our aircraft do not care whom to bomb



        The dust storm season is beginning ... What aviation actions are you talking about ??? Turn on the mind ...

        Neither Putin nor Assad are God or his viceroy on Earth in order to also rule nature ...

        And so, when these dust storms begin, the one who will win in time and skillfully “slip in” precisely in ground operations will win ...

        For this reason, spirits now need to be soaked with might and main Ivanovo, under the root, where they are only spotted ...
        1. gladcu2 29 October 2015 16: 18 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          veksha

          The dust storm season begins closer to spring.
    3. marlin1203 28 October 2015 09: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well, again: a meeting on the Elbe, zones of occupation, the Berlin Wall ... further on in a familiar scenario. what
      1. Das Boot 28 October 2015 09: 41 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: marlin1203
        Well, again: a meeting on the Elbe, zones of occupation, the Berlin Wall ... further on in a familiar scenario.

        Well, I hope Assad does not think about cyanide .... laughing
        1. Abakan 28 October 2015 10: 00 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          no))) Abobamka should think, not Assad
    4. Starover_Z 28 October 2015 09: 50 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In addition, the military department "is again considering the possibility of deploying US troops (in Iraq) closer to the front line."

      And there will be a second front line - local troops will be barrage detachments for the Americans so that they will not be offended by terrorists!
      And if the locals run intensively, the Americans will rush in front of them, without loss!
  2. prabiz 28 October 2015 09: 05 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    “We are not going to have a long operation,” we will tighten our tails and roll off in our own way! wassat
    1. svetoruss 28 October 2015 09: 08 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      They are not going to prolong the operation, they are going to prolong it
      1. hydrox 28 October 2015 09: 18 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: svetoruss
        They are not going to prolong the operation, they are going to prolong it

        Only with money and weapons, but what if the skilled manpower of the IS decreases daily (there, they will even be relocated to Yemen)?
        Does this mean that the IG is still blown away?
        1. svetoruss 28 October 2015 09: 29 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          You yourself answered your question, didn’t leave in Syria, but relocated. They want to save the backbone ...
        2. veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 32 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: hydrox
          IS manpower decreases daily (out, even in Yemen they will be relocated)?
          Does this mean that IG is still blown away?



          The IG is not blown away, it is saved ... Yesterday, the Turks took 500 fighters from Yemen to the territory with four planes ...

          PS Thanks to such "rescuers," the problem of war on a global scale will not yet be resolved ...
          1. Sober 28 October 2015 12: 34 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            He is not blown away, they pump him up.
  3. Alcoholic 28 October 2015 09: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “We will not refrain from ... conducting missions directly, whether it be air strikes or direct actions on the ground,” he told senators.


    Only after approval by Syria (Russia) :)
    In all cases, the mattresses will want to close the sky over Syria.
    Otherwise, they will be scared.
    Ugh ...
    Even writing is disgusting
    1. hydrox 28 October 2015 09: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Alcoholic
      In all cases, the mattresses will want to close the sky over Syria.

      But Russia will not allow them to do this, because it will mean our defeat. In addition, you can "close the sky" in two ways: anti-aircraft (by depriving you of the ability to move freely) and EW (by depriving you of the ability to navigate and use weapons to aim at the target).
      And if the first method is not always acceptable, then for the second method we have almost unlimited possibilities.
      1. veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 34 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: hydrox
        There are two ways to “close the sky”: anti-aircraft (by depriving of the ability to move freely) and EW (by depriving of the ability to navigate and use weapons to aim at the target).



        Guys, don’t rack your brains ... Soon, God or Allah, or rather Her Majesty Nature, will herself close the sky over Syria for aircraft of both Russia and the "coalition" ...
    2. gladcu2 29 October 2015 16: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Alcoholic

      Do not take to heart.

      In peacetime, so as not to mess around, there is always work on drawing up plans for an attack or defense. So to speak, development.

      Maybe that “talker bird” blurted out something to the journalists. They did not understand, and where possible they thought of it. So all this is chatter.
  4. Andrea 28 October 2015 09: 07 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    They do not drag out, but quickly destroy, only 4 years. Hot Estonian guys were envious of such speed, and Finnish too. laughing
  5. Bort radist 28 October 2015 09: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "Washington is not going to delay the operation against the IG"
    He is not going to curtail her either. Everything is being withdrawn and withdrawn from Afghanistan, it is wonderful to go.
  6. Ivan Ivanovich 28 October 2015 09: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I hope that soon "our Western partners" will tear ...
    1. Bort radist 28 October 2015 09: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
      I hope that soon "our Western partners" will tear ...

      It is very similar while candles help, but only the proctologist can remove the main consequences of the clinic.
  7. Maxom75 28 October 2015 09: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Four years are no longer dragging out if the USSR had fought a war like this with Germany so far. Russia does not like to chew snot like that, it fights quickly and effectively, simply because the war is expensive and painful. We remember the price we were given the VICTORY VICTORY, and the Americans never fought.
  8. Denis DV 28 October 2015 09: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It seems that Washington will use its armed forces as a detachment, chasing ISIS into battle against the Syrians from Iraq. And the supply routes to ISIS will be reduced, they will be immediately transferred to the Syrian-Iraqi border. In general, they organize logistics to support and maintain terrorists in the Middle East hi
  9. Wise Kaa 28 October 2015 09: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We will conduct a ground operation in support of the IS .... emmm against ISIS in Syria and Iraq
  10. A-Sim 28 October 2015 09: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They will clean all their contacts in ISIS. If they can, of course.
  11. Nyrobsky 28 October 2015 10: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In short, they will carry out an operation to evacuate the unfinished Ishilovites, under the guise of the American contingent.
    Like, Keifor in a new role - in Yugoslavia, the interests of the Albanian thugs were protected, and the Ishilovites in Syria.
  12. cniza 28 October 2015 10: 13 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Finches
    And it was an "operation ??? ....... laughing



    According to their concepts, yes, the trouble is that Congress allocates little money. wink
  13. veksha50 28 October 2015 10: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "more actively support the Syrian opposition and did not rule out ground operations against terrorists "...

    The season of dust storms is coming ... Aviation will be chained ...

    If the Amers begin a ground-based land operation under the guise of fighting IS, then this will be for the Syrians and for our not comme il faut ...

    Does it provoke Russia, by its chatter, to include our ground forces in battles ???

    Previously, they had a goal - to redirect the tip of the IS strike from the USA towards Russia ... In practice, they almost succeeded ...

    Now their goal number 1 is to drive Russia into the conditions of Afghanistan-2 ...

    This cannot be allowed, but I can’t even imagine what to do ... One hope is that Putin and his team will have the wisdom and cunning to get out of this wild situation ...
  14. cniza 28 October 2015 10: 16 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: svetoruss
    They are not going to prolong the operation, they are going to prolong it



    To infinity wassat They need a pump for pumping attendants.
  15. Aristide 28 October 2015 10: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Question to Ashton Carter: What the hell did the Americans bomb ISIS for a whole year? Where did the American Air Force take out bombs and missiles, having made thousands of "sorties" sorties during the indicated period? Probably played darts among themselves. Yankees, those fruits! They say one thing, do another, plan a third. Listen to them, then they will take the whole World in one fell swoop. As the Russian satirist M. Zadornov says: the Americans are the chiefs of planet Earth. Everywhere they are in charge and everywhere their nose is visible. It’s time for them to calm down already!
  16. pvv113 28 October 2015 11: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “We will not refrain from ... conducting missions directly, be it air strikes or direct actions on the ground,” he told senators

    Looks, not all hospitals have bombed yet
  17. vladimirw 28 October 2015 12: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Pind .. they will send their troops and cover the IS bases from air strikes
  18. mamont5 28 October 2015 13: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And so already tightened nowhere.