The Americans for the first time conducted tests of the formed missile defense system in Europe

For the first time since the deployment of missile defense elements in Europe, the United States conducted tests of its emerging system. The interception of a ballistic missile that was moving over European territory was carried out by the short-range anti-missile missile Terrier Orion from the sea range on the Hebrides (located off the western coast of Scotland).

The anti-missile missile was launched from the US destroyer USS Ross (DDG 71), which is involved in the MTMD Forum, which is conducted by the NATO countries. As reported in the press service of the US Navy, the anti-missile successfully intercepted a ballistic missile SM-3 Block IA.

Testing of elements of the American missile defense system is demonstrated on the Internet. A video of the launch of the anti-missile missile from the side of the destroyer is presented by the press service US Navy. The video of the interception of a ballistic missile was not published.

According to NATO officials, the missile defense system in Europe, created by the Americans, will be fully formed by 2018 year. Some of its elements are present in Spain, Poland and Romania.

Comments

[avvg]

But we are not afraid of it! Russian missiles can overcome any missile defense system without fail.

[Dembel77]

No matter how much the jackal repeats about his peacefulness, habits will still give out a predator. And US actions in Europe once again confirm this. Because the deployment and testing of a missile defense system in Europe is not at all defense, but just a means of attack.

[figwam]

A video of the interception of a ballistic missile is not yet published.

So I don’t know whether she intercepted the rocket or not.

[shtanko.49]

It was smooth on paper, but forgot about the ravines. It’s one thing to shoot at a specific target and quite another when you don’t know where and what will fly, and even under enemy fire.

[Human-dv]

intercepted and delivered to the base intact

[Altona]

Quote: Human-DV

intercepted and delivered to the base intact

--------------------
And what is generally shown in the video? Fireworks launch rehearsal? Something flew out with a loud bang, something burned out inside the rocket container. Some garbage. And I thought ...

[Andrey Yuryevich]

According to the press service of the US Navy, a missile defense successfully intercepted a ballistic missile SM-3 Block IA.

I didn’t even eat it ... is the SM-3 Block IA an interceptor missile ...? or has everything changed?

[atalef]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

According to the press service of the US Navy, a missile defense successfully intercepted a ballistic missile SM-3 Block IA.

I didn’t even eat it ... is the SM-3 Block IA an interceptor missile ...? or has everything changed?

Hi Andrew.

. US Navy website.

The launch of the Terrier Orion short-range training ballistic missile was carried out from a range on the Hebrides Islands, located in the Atlantic Ocean off the western coast of Scotland. At the same time, two anti-ship missiles were launched.

The Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IA interceptor missile was launched from the destroyer Ross (USS Ross, DDG 71) and successfully destroyed a ballistic target in space. SM-68s were launched from USS The Sullivans (DDG 2), intercepting anti-ship missiles. The Navy website notes that during the test, the first interception of a ballistic target in Europe, the first launch of the SM-3 missile outside the United States was carried out, and the first experience of international cooperation within the European missile defense system was obtained.

According to the Sixth Operational Fleet of the US Navy, the exercises included all four American destroyers equipped with the AEGIS missile defense system, which are constantly based in Rota (Spain). In addition to the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway and France also took part in the exercises. These countries are part of the Maritime Theater of War Forum, created in 1999. The organization was created to coordinate efforts to create a missile defense system.

[Saburov]

As always, the Yankees do not indicate either goal parameters, character, or speed ... On March 31, Senior Officer at the Center for US and European Affairs at the Brookings Institution Stephen Pifer wrote in The National Interest magazine that there is no reliable and affordable defense system in the USA from intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and submarine ballistic missiles (SLBMs). - When I once asked an American official who was versed in the question of what he would have done if the DPRK launched an intercontinental ballistic missile in the direction of Seattle, he said that he would launch several interceptor missiles of the “Land Missile Defense System on the marching flight section” "(Ground-Based Midcourse Defense, GBMD) and would have crossed fingers," the expert wrote.
The US missile defense system is, as they say, at the stage of laboratory tests. Well, the Americans shot down a missile defense satellite at an altitude of 200 kilometers. But who will attack a nuclear missile with just one missile defense today? The tests of the system took place, so to speak, in a lightened environment - without jamming, the target path was known in advance, its parameters and a beacon was installed on the target. So, the American missile defense system is not such a formidable force, as they say about it. And even more so, there will be no full-fledged tests with the launch of 5-10 ballistic missiles for full testing of the missile defense system.

[voyaka uh]

for Saburov:
"if the DPRK launched an intercontinental ballistic missile towards Seattle,
he said he would launch several land-based interceptor missiles
anti-missile defense on the cruise leg of the flight "////

He told the truth. The effectiveness of intercepting ICBMs with anti-ballistic missiles from Alaska is about
50% (according to test results). Those. correctly launch 3 missiles to intercept to get an interception.

But I remind you that the effectiveness of missiles during the Vietnam War was even lower. 3-4 missiles were launched. Then the accuracy has improved - now they start up by 2.
Missile defense systems have already been deployed - this is not a laboratory, but the effectiveness of the defeat
still low.

[Altona]

Quote: voyaka uh

Missile defense systems have already been deployed - this is not a laboratory, but the effectiveness of the defeat
still low.

--------------------
Increasing the accuracy and efficiency of the existing system will also increase its already unbearable cost ... Second, it is still more of an attack weapon for attacking enemy control posts and key defense elements, provided that the container does not have anti-missiles, but strike missiles .. .

[Saburov]

Do you remember how many old Iraqi Scuds Patriot managed to intercept? But statements about the invincibility of the Patriot were oh so much ... According to the Israeli Ministry of Defense, the Patriots, despite the cost of missile defense (including the case with the expenditure of 28 units on target, managed to intercept no more than 20% of the missiles launched by Iraqis.

[mark2]

Are you scaring us, or are you calming yourself? This is me about the "Iron Dome"))

[mark2]

Putin and Obama are sitting, talking, drinking tea and then Vladimir Vladimirovich and says:
- Barack, let's play the game alone. For one check the strength of our armies?
- Come on, and in which?
- Well ... We will launch our Bulava, and you will shoot it down with your missile defense.
Obama's eyes popped out:
- And if we can’t?
- Well, it's okay, we'll launch another one for you! )))

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: atalef

Launch of the Terrier Orion short-range training ballistic missile ...

well, that’s how it will be right
Hello Sasha..

[yushch]

I heard that the SM-3, in addition to intercepting ICBMs, can also be used as ground-to-ground missiles and may well be used by amers in their concept of a global non-nuclear disarming strike. On whom this blow is planned I think everyone understands.

[ROD VDVshny]

Quote: yushch

and may well be used by amers in their concept of a global disarming non-nuclear strike.

I have great doubts that this concept today is not the biggest headache of mattresses and companies.
European missile defense system is tailored for the fight against ballistic missiles. The "eyes" are the system's radars, the targets are bulky and complex, they cannot be hidden so easily ... they can be gracefully disabled by the same wonderful Caliber. After that, the system is practically useless. Then, if necessary, "add", and will go ballistic
Regarding the Ajis and the anti-missile defense belt around scanomatrasia, I had doubts after reading this article: "Degradation" of destroyers "Arly Burke" http://army-news.ru/2013/10/degradaciya-esmincev-arli-berk/
Particularly impressed: The main component of the Aegis system is a powerful three-coordinate radar with four fixed phased antenna arrays capable of detecting and automatically tracking hundreds of aerial targets, programming autopilots of anti-aircraft missiles and tracking targets in low-Earth orbit.

In practice, she showed the opposite. Despite its state-of-the-art look and ample opportunities to control the airspace over long distances, the AN / SPY-1 radar was “weak-sighted” when it detected low-flying targets (NLC) - and it shares!
In the open press, there is still no information about the defeat by Aegis of supersonic air targets at extremely low altitude - probably, the American Berks have not learned how to deal with such threats. The released “Mosquito” or the Russian-Indian “Brahmos” are likely to break through the destroyer’s air defense / missile defense system and hit the target. That is ... and CALIBER ALSO
It also hardens the certainty that the Darkest, as usual, did not open all the cards and aces still up his sleeve.
From my point of view, the multi-billion dollar and high-maintenance missile defense system and the huge ship group in the "product-quality" nomination are no longer dancing solo.
I am pleased to hear the opinion of specialists, I do not pretend to the ultimate truth

[222222]

For the first time, the Americans tested the emerging missile defense system in Europe "
Let's - build more all over Europe ..
... the Caspian flotilla with one salvo made the American missile defense system unnecessary in Europe and thereby with this salvo removed the "Iranian threat to Europe." There is NO more "Iranian. Missile threat" for Europe !!! It would not be bad for Europe to thank Russia !!!

[Alex_Rarog]

One devil will not succeed in intercepting anything, for Iskander and the caliber will be burned there sooner ...

[Oman 47]

An attempt to justify themselves after the "Caspian fireworks"?

[Wiruz]

Unsuccessful attempt, I will tell you. It’s useless to shoot SM-3 on Caliber, it flies most of the flight near the ground

[Manul]

Quote: Wiruz

Unsuccessful attempt, I will tell you. It’s useless to shoot SM-3 on Caliber, it flies most of the flight near the ground

Still, we are talking about intercepting a ballistic missile, and we have enough of them. Or do we admit that our Poplars and Yars became useless with the advent of missile defense? I'm interested in the technical side of the issue.
1. How they will fix and track the missile launched from our territory (well, or Iran from which sanctions are lifted ) with the help of what radars? (We are building Voronezh for this. And what do the "partners" have?)
2. Surprised that the destroyers are part of the missile defense. I thought missile defense is a network of ground-based missile defense systems. Are ships on an ongoing basis in the form of combat duty supposed to barrage in a certain area? That is, a submarine in which case you don’t have to bother with the search?

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: Manul

1. How to fix

Quote: Manul

2. Surprised that the destroyers are part of the missile defense.

uuuu ... brother! how is everything running ...! Apparently, it is necessary to pass the "technical minimum" so that the elementary questions (yours) do not confuse you ... I do not put a minus, but it would be better to have a "two" for unlearned lessons!

[Manul]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

uuuu ... brother! how is everything running ...! apparently it is necessary to pass the "technical minimum" so that elementary questions (yours) do not confuse you ...

This is not an answer. You can give a reference, at least write a few words about what to look for, and those who themselves know nothing can pat on the shoulder.

[region58]

Quote: Manul

You can give a reference, at least write a few words about what to look for

Yes, type in the search bar of any browser "system about the United States" - you will read it.

[Manul]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

Apparently, it is necessary to pass the "technical minimum" so that the elementary questions (yours) do not confuse you ... I do not put a minus, but it would be better to have a "two" for unlearned lessons!

Quote: region58

Yes, type in the search bar of any browser "system about the United States" - you will read it.

I do not understand what is difficult to answer . But the question hung in the air, you have to answer yourself.

Dear Manul. The missile defense system consists of 3 echelons - land, sea and space.
The ground consists of early warning radars and long-range sensors that work in the interests of ensuring the potential of both the tactical and strategic missile defense system. These include: appropriate means of the leading NATO countries, as well as long-standing ground-based early warning radars of the US strategic missile defense system, which were deployed in the UK (in Failingdales) in 1962, Denmark (near Tula, Greenland) in 1961 and in 1998 in the north of Norway (Vardø), which is about 60 km from the border with Russia. All these radars have undergone modernization in recent years.
http://ria.ru/spravka/20110713/399998194.html#ixzz3pByJfUjp
Kwajalein from the Marshall Islands is planning to move to the Czech Republic.
Aegis is a universal BIUS, and can also track ballistic launches. With the number of destroyers that the United States has, it is not difficult for them to saturate the waters for the timely detection of missile launches.

The third tier of the missile defense system provides the first two actions - a network of detection satellites.

The SBIRS ballistic missile early detection space system is expected to be implemented in a two -chevel version. It was also stated that 24 STSS satellites should be put into low Earth orbit, and 5 SBIRSs will be put into geostationary orbit, the task of which will be to detect ballistic missile launches. (Wiki)

The number of countries participating in missile defense is also constantly growing, and many countries are in the process of negotiations.
Take a look at the rest of the details yourself on the Internet, as there is a lot of information about it and you won’t tell everything at once.

[Oman 47]

I'm a little about that.
About a curved mattress attempt to save face, to prove own significance.
The political moment outweighs the purely technical one.
Plus, an attempt to reassure their mattress toppers.

[The stranger]

Or partisans.

[inkass_98]

Is everyone defending themselves from Iran? Nu-nu ... Then, for some reason, resentful cries are heard, why is it that the Strategic Missile Forces rockets are aimed at them, and what for us?

[Wiruz]

It is time for us to conduct training launches 77n6. The sensor of patriotism goes off scale

[SAM 5]

A video of the interception of a ballistic missile is not yet published.

... t. K. target self-destructive

[drunkram]

What are you talking about? just another hospital flew past the ship, and that

[ASUR]

+ any modification of the EW'ot will be nearby.
and put everything in the pants .. as always

[Alexander 3]

Mattresses play in public, puffed up.

[Nymp]

America, after the Russian-Syrian knockout, is trying to preserve the strict appearance of the world gendarme. They flex their muscles in the face of the Russian "aggressor". A predictable step, "The Russians do not like missile defense in Europe! Now we will strain them, and at the same time we will show Europe who is the boss!" They do not feel at all that this predictable tension is also playing to undermine their image.

[Flinky]

For the first time I hear that the northern part of AO is a European territory.

The United States first tested missile defense in Europe, destroying a training ballistic missile in the North Atlantic. As the U.S. Navy press service said on Tuesday, the firing was carried out from the destroyer Ross, which takes part in naval exercises along with the ships of the American NATO allies.

[Barakuda]

Cool. Mattresses believe all this, like children. Santa Claus steers. A geyropa rejoices, the first to turn to ashes. WELL NOT ID.I.HEAT?

[Vincent]

With equal strength, Americans believe in two things - in their own skill and invulnerability. Most likely the puppeteer does not care about reality, the main thing is to unleash the third world one, and there the whole world is in ruin. As a result, the one under whose leadership private armies will remain will rule.

[Amurets]

The Americans still believe that the ocean barrier will save them, but it has not been there since the Cuban Missile Crisis. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Americans discovered only half of our boats, and then only those that had bad batteries and defective diesel engines. Three boats, and one missile carrier they found I read this in the book of Rear Admiral Lyabedzka "On all the oceans of the planet." He also writes that then the Americans realized that they did not have an ocean barrier. Then they forgot about it and had to carry out operations Aport and Atrina. It seems the time has come to remind The United States has NO OCEAN BARRIER, and the Japanese were the first to break through in 1942.

[Gormenghast]

Provocateurs.

We need to build copies of iconic Zapadensky structures (Statue of Liberty, Washington Monument, Eiffel Tower, etc.) at our landfills from waste materials - you can inflatable - and experience our rockets on them.

[Socialism 2.0]

don't slip into north korean

[Robinzone]

The Americans, despite the backwardness of their interceptor missiles, locate so-called missile defense bases as close as possible to Russia. In this situation, I am alarmed by the fact that they know that we know that their anti-missiles, excuse me, are feces.
BUT!
These descendants of war criminals are well aware that we will not be the first to strike, so they do not need to worry about the quality of their missile defense system in Europe. This knowledge allows, in providing the strategy of the "first global strike" "quietly", to cram there, for a start, tomahawks, and then what will be developed in an abrupt way.

But the real missile defense may not be necessary for them, because they will act within the framework of this strategy.
And we must remember they just wait ...

This is all somewhat alarmist, but I would do it in their place.

[Wedmak]

The interception of a ballistic missile moving over European territory was carried out from a sea range on the Hebrides (located off the western coast of Scotland) with a short-range missile defense Terrier Orion.

Do I understand correctly that this is such a small anti-aircraft racket? And for some reason, in different publications it is called either a missile defense, then a ballistic missile, or something else. For some reason, the TTX does not shine anywhere, but judging by the size, its radius of action is not too large.

[anfil]

Recently, the media and the blog - sphere have been actively voicing opinions,
that the US missile defense system, and in particular, its European segment, is not
represent, and will not pose a threat to the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation for a long time to come. And this
opinions are voiced not only by journalists and bloggers, but also by a number of former
military on the pages of print media, in particular, the former chief
Strategic Missile Forces headquarters V.I. Esin, who gave an interview to the newspaper VPK (http: //vpk-news.ruarticles17289).
The position of the former military leader can be expressed in terms of missile defense with the following citations:
–... To be afraid that before 2020, Americans will create a system capable of
intercept Russian ICBMs, it’s not worth ....
–... As an expert who has devoted more than one year to this problem, I believe that in
in the form in which they create their missile defense system, for the period 2020 – 2025, it will not have the ability to significantly affect the potential of nuclear deterrence in Russia ....
–... the Americans still have not conducted a single test on the real
interception of the intercontinental missile warhead. They
limited to intercepting targets ...

More details link:http://www.dancomm.ru/o_evropro_i_standard_missile-3.pdf

[Wedmak]

created by the United States missile defense, and, in particular, its European segment is not
pose, and for a long time will not pose a threat to the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation

That is why now our people are intensively sawing the topic "Sarmat" and "Barguzin". And the products will come out in time for the 20th year, I suppose. The development of new warheads for ICBMs is also underway. Here, the truth is not even rumors about what and what is called, but I hope that they are working on the topic.

[arane]

Hm! Are there any sane people? What are you talking about? What does the caliber and iskander have to do with it? Yes, our construction battalion about shovels in the cabbage, in the dust ....
First of all, a system for intercepting strategic missiles. And its successful test in the near future may create a false or real feeling of a relatively safe (acceptable) preventive strike from the United States! Successful implementation of pro is a direct violation of strategic parity! And take this seriously

[slizhov]

Create, create, as your Ishil ...
Everything will sink into oblivion at once ...

[31rus]

Dear, what does "Caliber" have to do with it? The missile defense system in Europe began to be implemented a long time ago and rather our "Calibers" are a response to the deployment of missile defense, the very destruction of a missile is only part of the overall system (reconnaissance, detection, tracking, classification, destruction), not one must think that Iskander and Caliber will solve all problems, the same naval component of missile defense

[Vincent]

But does the missile defense itself solve the problem of intercepting missiles maneuvering along the entire flight path? What to do with this problem?

[Amurets]

No matter how they write, but in reality even up-to-date air defense can penetrate up to 20% of likely enemy’s planes. The percentage of modern missile defense breakthroughs is somewhere around 40-50%. Does this mean that in theory half of the missiles will break through. And what warheads will be used for interception? If kinetic, then the percentage of breakthrough will depend on the type of interference used by the enemy. In case of nuclear warheads, interference will affect less, but forget about the threat of nuclear infection from the use of their anti-missiles. So this is a double-edged sword.

[dvina71]

Quote: Amurets

but forget about the threat of nuclear contamination from using their anti-cancer

ID at an altitude of 30 km is practically safe in all respects. The charge power is 53b6 - 10ct. True, such an interception is imprisoned for a massive blow. The Americans are trying to catch the ICBMs one at a time.

[Amurets]

I agree, but not in everything. Many factors have to be taken into account. Remember the instructions for using missiles with nuclear warheads of the S-75 and S-200 systems. They also went to great heights, but there was still a danger of infection. Is that why the Americans are switching to kinetic warhead.

[dvina71]

Quote: Amurets

I agree, but not in everything

Since then, a lot of water has flowed. The efficiency of charges has been constantly growing. The efficiency factor of the Jerosim bomb was no more than 10%, and people there almost immediately began to rebuild the city. Disease-specific statistics can be easily found. She's not so scary.
Since the infection does not threaten much, the poison explosion leaves few unfinished nuclides, unlike the reactor .. where everything is in the process of division.

[vfqjh]

Their efforts, but for peaceful purposes ... that would be news!

[SAM 5]

Their efforts, but for peaceful purposes

Well, my friend, you are bent. Rather, the Earth will turn into a return.

[Barakuda]

The US has NEVER fought an equal adversary. As soon as a chipper, quickly dump. The story however. And missile defense, in all seriousness, looks like a vobla cut. From under the Urals, Poplar spits, in the Mediterranean, Baltic Sea the boat with Aegis will react? I doubt it. I don’t go into geography, for example.

[Felix1]

no one will bomb Europe with calibers and Iskander because all the deputies have officials and other governing bodies there: real estate, money and children. Well, they won't bomb themselves. Someone disagrees? to take away from themselves "honestly" acquired by back-breaking labor?

[Amurets]

If it starts, then there will be no survivors on either side of the ocean. If the "Black Hand" works, no official will stop it. Read though the Wiki "System of guaranteed retaliation. By the way, the Americans have it too. So if it starts this show, it will be the last in the history of mankind. No hope that someone will survive.

[Yerlan]

I will correct you a little. Not "Black Hand" but "Dead Hand". Or in our opinion: the Perimeter system. Respectfully yours.

[Amurets]

Thank you! I apparently have a typo in the book.

[rotmistr60]

For felix1

But you do not know that neither officials nor deputies decide to strike back. There is a Commander-in-Chief and a Minister of Defense. And the deputies and other officials in this case are just spectators like you and me.

[Felix1]

here, you are talking about retaliation, if so then I agree. But we are talking about anti-missile defense.

[Murking]

And here heaps of officials, the decision on a nuclear apocalypse, will be made by only one person, relying on their internal convictions. If the Americans knew that there would be no nuclear answer, Russia would have long been torn apart using NATO and conventional weapons.

[Felix1]

where does the nuclear apocalypse come in? my comment was developed in the wrong direction.

[Amurets]

Unfortunately in that. For a local war, when almost all of Europe is in NATO, will turn into, I do not know the number, a world war.

[Taygerus]

Quote: 31rus

Dear, what does "Caliber" have to do with it? The missile defense system in Europe began to be implemented a long time ago and rather our "Calibers" are a response to the deployment of missile defense, the very destruction of a missile is only part of the overall system (reconnaissance, detection, tracking, classification, destruction), not one must think that Iskander and Caliber will solve all problems, the same naval component of missile defense

The Iskanders and Caliber certainly will not solve all the problems, we also have a comprehensive approach, broader tied to the interaction of different branches of the armed forces in the fight against missile defense, with the same naval component

[Riv]

A source in the Russian Ministry of Defense reports: in response to the deployment of a missile defense system in Europe, large-caliber artillery units equipped with rubber shells and mines will be deployed in the Kaliningrad Region. These are truly hellish weapons. During the tests, a rubber mine of 100 mm caliber, fired near Chelyabinsk, jumped to Kamchatka and could have ridden off to Japan if it hadn’t been heroically caught by Private Kozlodoev’s footcloth. Serviceman is presented to the government award. There was nothing alive on the mines flight path.

[rotmistr60]

American missile defense system in Europe will be fully formed by 2018

Three years later, the West still does not know what will be adopted by us. So don’t say gop ...

[Evgenia]

But who said that our missiles will fly through Europe?

[anfil]

The Internet demonstrates tests of elements of the US missile defense system. A video of a missile launch from a destroyer is presented by the US Navy press service. A video of the interception of a ballistic missile is not yet published.

And here we are, and the launch showed the defeat of goals

[Evgenia]

Has anyone seen a rocket?

[shimus]

And why would the US military not intercept its own missile, especially knowing how the military industry works, which is all in private hands, they 100% knew in advance both the speed of the target, its flight path, and MOST IMPORTANT, on a ballistic target, with a very high probability, there was a radio beacon, for the exact guidance of a missile defense !!!
This is not the first time that one is tested, but in a combat situation a rocket knocks down anything but its target !!!

[atamankko]

If you wanted to show your success, show the result objectively.

[twincam]

karoch diverge poson, vidos dull.

[Fonmeg]

Well, let them entertain themselves with the illusions of security. They intercepted ICBMs (their own), the characteristics of which are known, launch, time and point are known. Oh well.

[Aroma77]

Here are the clowns, they knew when they would fly, where they would fly from, where they would fly - they were amazed! And the launches of our "Calibers", which passed 1500 kilometers, did not even notice, they digested in silence for two days.

[region58]

Quote: Aroma77

And the launches of our "Caliber", which passed 1500 kilometers, did not even notice

And how do we know whether they noticed or not?

[Old26]

Quote: Manul

1. How will they fix and track the missile launched from our territory (well, or Iran from which sanctions are lifted) using which radars?

As well as on our part. The first stage is SPRN satellites. The second stage - SPRN radars. The question is very voluminous and it will not work to answer in two phrases. Just like we, the Americans have a network of SPRN radars located both in the USA and in other countries: Great Britain, Denmark (Greenland), Alaska, the Aleutian Islands, Taiwan, and now it seems such a station is bought by someone in the Persian Gulf (like the Emirates). Look for materials on the US missile defense and missile defense network, there will give a lot of links to radars and their locations and types.

Quote: Manul

2. Surprised that the destroyers are part of the missile defense. I thought missile defense is a network of ground-based missile defense systems. Are ships on an ongoing basis in the form of combat duty supposed to barrage in a certain area? That is, a submarine in which case you don’t have to bother with the search?

But ABM ABM is different. In this case, this is a theater missile defense system, designed to intercept short and medium-range missiles. The deployment of a missile defense base in Romania was announced 10 years ago. The main target is Iranian missiles. The EUROPRO system consists of several segments. These are SM-3 interceptor missiles in Romania and after 2020 in Poland, THAAD interceptor missiles in Turkey EMNIP, these are US Navy ships with the same Standard, the French segment - Exogard and Exogard-M ... These are ships from France, Italy and England (in the Mediterranean and North Seas). In the future - US ships in the Baltic. Moreover, the missile defense base in Poland from the point of view of specialists, incl. and the American ones are not optimally located. It is possible that she will not appear there at all. Since it is powerless against the ICBMs of Russia, and against the same Iranian missiles it is positioned extremely suboptimally.

Quote: Fonmeg

Well, let them entertain themselves with the illusions of security. They intercepted ICBMs (their own), the characteristics of which are known, launch, time and point are known. Oh well.

We shouldn't indulge ourselves with illusions. Americans have been working, have been working for several years, and from year to year the system is becoming more elaborate. And what about the interception by the Americans of their own missiles ... Do you think that when ours intercept targets, these are American missiles ?? No, they are also ours, and everyone knows perfectly well where and when it will go. Launch time and directions - "Polichenel's secret"

Quote: atamankko

Wanted to show your success, show the result objectively

us? Are they full of frietina? Or do we give others information about the intercepts of our missile defense system? For the enemy to take action? Oh well

[Boris.Voi]

They needed to launch 26 missiles (according to the number of fired by us) and intercept all of them (not to mention surprise), then it would still be worth something, and so ....

[IAlex]

I doubt that after the timely launch of the Caliber, the EU will want to try to fill up the bear, even after showing the American missile defense and security promises in response to the invasion of the Russian Federation ...

[mamont5]

Quote: figvam

A video of the interception of a ballistic missile is not yet published.

So I don’t know whether she intercepted the rocket or not.

Of course. After all, if the USA had fiasco here too, then at least drown. Self-liquidator could well have stood on the target rocket.

[Old26]

Quote: jarome

I summarize the general direction of comments: Yes, we will throw their missile defense caps on! It is relaxing because we are irresistible and invulnerable.
There are dozens of air defense experts here. They said that the Caliber is flying low and can’t be brought down to 100 meters, but what about the Patriot? It seems like an interceptor and mines. height allow to get the Caliber upon detection. Just interested. We say that Tamagavk is a shit for us to bring down a question.

Well, how else? After all, everything is "mirrored". When it comes to the fact that 5-7 thousand "tomahawks" can be used against us, what do we say? Fig you? Can't we detect the presence of carriers and the launch of "axes"? they will go to the target for 2,5-3 hours. Yes, we will eat them a hundred times. We have air defense systems with (the following is a listing of the types of air defense systems)
Right there, exactly the opposite. And the "Calibers" nullified the missile defense system, which is generally not intended to intercept aerodynamic targets. Here we "at once" carry out the missile defense of the states in Europe, launching "Caliber" on them 2 hours before the hour. Here "Calibers" turn out to be indestructible and invisible, because they did not detect the launch from the Caspian Sea. Moreover, all these conclusions are made on the basis of the screams of the media, primarily them, but ours also make their contribution by publishing "Hurray-patriotic" comments designed for the level of housewives. When we make a "launch of an anti-missile missile" at a target, and the launch is real, but there is no target (this is relevant now, after the collapse of the USSR), that is, when an anti-missile missile enters a given area, and "virtually" strikes a non-existent target that ends up in the affected area of ​​its warhead is a 100% missile defense success ... When our "sworn friends" shoot at their own missile - it's a common fake, they knew where it would appear, knew the course and altitude ... At the same time, such a launch speaks of worthlessness American missile defense.

And all in this version. Well, I want people to raise their self-awareness, self-conceit, to show that we will tear all ...
They say that NATO members did not notice the launch of "Caliber". Maybe the launch itself was not detected, but the flight ... Why did you get it that you didn't? Due to the fact that nothing is written about it. That's how smart people won't write. Let us think. that was not detected. so sometimes I want to ask. Before the "Caliber" strike, our planes carried out raids on ISIS bases there. Do the people think NATO is tracking their flights? AWACS hanging in the air? Why do they think that the same AWACS did not detect CALIBERS? There is no answer and will not be, because it is not profitable to think so, lowers self-esteem.
Numerous statements that the Patriot could not even intercept the CALIBER. Moreover, the performance characteristics of at least the PAC-1 or PAC-2 modifications are taken, where the minimum defeat height is 60 meters (apparently, they have not heard about other modifications adapted to defeat cruise missiles). This is followed by a record that the Patriot could not have hit the CALIBER, since he has at least 60, and the CALIBER goes as far as 15 meters. There is either a misunderstanding of what the person is writing, or the usual distortion, because the height of 15 meters is the height of the anti-ship flight above the sea, and the CALIBR went at altitudes of 100-150 meters, and in some areas rose to an altitude of over a kilometer.
Well, and one more "reason to rejoice." It turns out that we have now "swept away" the American fleet from the oceans and are capable of hitting ships at a distance of 1500-2000 km (although for some reason, the CD is taken to defeat land stationary goals. Well, etc. etc. At the same time, the adversary will not work, the air defense will not, the aircraft will not, and we will multiply by zero while their missile defense