General Hodges (USA) is sounding the alarm: "I have no bridges, I have no trucks ..."

American generals sounded the alarm. The Pentagon believes that any new reduction in funding for the US military budget, which has been spoken about recently in the presidential administration, can lead to negative and irreversible consequences for American security. Thus, the notorious General Ben Hodges - the commander of US ground forces in Europe - said that there is already a significant shortage of equipment in order to supply military equipment to the European continent in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner.


General Hodges (USA) is sounding the alarm: "I have no bridges, I have no trucks ..."


Ben Hodges (newspaper material The New York Times, translation RIA News):
I don't have bridges, I don't have trucks that can transport Tanks, we don’t have enough helicopters to do what we need to do.


According to Hodges, it is necessary to supply transport helicopters, but no funds have been allocated for this at the Pentagon.

According to the NYT, the budget of the US military declined, which led to a decrease in the number of US military personnel in Europe by 35% over the past three years.

According to the same Hodges, the reduction affected the fleet of vehicles, auxiliary equipment, weapons systems, infrastructure facilities.

At the start of 1990, more than 200 of thousands of American soldiers were present in Europe, in 2015, the number of troops, according to the NYT, fell to 26 of thousands. To what extent the reductions indicated in the American media correspond to reality is a separate question.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Irokez 19 October 2015 13: 23 New
    • 30
    • 0
    +30
    Not the guys of the Pentagon-NATO, now your land will burn under your feet and they will begin to squeeze you on many fronts, and the most important is the green pieces on which you feed and stand.
    "NATO spike on the green legs." Such a frog - Crazy.
    1. KazaK Bo 19 October 2015 13: 31 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Irokez
      Not the guys of the Pentagon-NATO, you will now have the land burning under your feet and they will begin to squeeze you on many fronts,

      Ostap Bender: PENTAGON - MORTGAGE! KEEP! BL. EAST WILL HELP YOU! "Beloved enemies are terrorists" with ISIS support ... will share what the Pentagon has allocated to them before!
      1. hedgehog in the fog 19 October 2015 13: 35 New
        • 19
        • 0
        +19
        Ha surprised, the Romanians and the Bulgarians do not have kerosene for their interceptors, which take off to escort patrols that 95, a great NATO, everything is kept in the United States, funding will collapse, and NATO will scatter around the kitchen like cockroaches
        1. hydrox 19 October 2015 13: 49 New
          • 10
          • 0
          +10
          === fell to 26 thousand people. ===
          Well, it's good to lie to the general!
          In Europe alone, the US has 260 military bases: do you get 100 military bases per base?
          Yes, they only have to be in the rear services!
        2. iConst 19 October 2015 13: 56 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: hedgehog in the fog
          ha surprised ...
          - This is the whole Western mentality - the general ached, cried ...
          How to fight without a battery? We must give up!
          1. roadsmell 19 October 2015 14: 55 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            How, how .. As always - to choose a small worthless state, declare the head of state (some leader of this tribe) as a dictator, and to level this state with the ground with one aircraft carrier group.
            And that’s it. All war.

            And with a more or less powerful adversary, the nefik was scattered across hundreds of bases around the world.
        3. region58 19 October 2015 14: 32 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: hedgehog in the fog
          Romanians and Balgars do not have kerosene for their interceptors, which take off to escort the patrols 95

          Yeah, they also complained that the resource of their Eraplans was running out, and the Russians were still flying and flying ... They say that this way Russia undermines the defense of NATO ...
    2. zanoza 19 October 2015 13: 38 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      "Oh, poor, poor Yorick!" There is nothing to "rattle" in Europe the general. The idea that Russia is about to “take over” Europe, and there is nothing to save it, haunts the star general. As a professional, I understand him, BUT he is only an instrument in the hands of US politicians and votes with their submission: “NATO countries - arm yourself! More defense money! "
      1. Vend 19 October 2015 13: 43 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        So collect all the weapons from your foreign bases and everything will be enough laughing
        1. hydrox 19 October 2015 13: 51 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Wend
          So collect all the weapons from your foreign bases and everything will be enough


          Yeah, and turn it into scrap metal - what they have at European bases is rusty junk, there’s nothing to fight with!
          1. The stranger 19 October 2015 15: 31 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            So really nothing special.
            Look at the hydrological map of Europe. Do you really think that 70 - 80 ton tanks and non-amphibious armored personnel carriers are weapons? They seemed to be hoping that in a non-nuclear war they would somehow preserve the road network, which means the possibility of maneuver. And then suddenly iskander of different calibers, and bomber regiments were not on paper, and not on kites.
            So in a few days, all this will be clogged where he found the beginning of the war. The very idea of ​​a maneuvering war, and especially an offensive, is ghostly.

            Yes, they even destroyed tank trailers, back in the 90s. As unnecessary, they say. Although such trucks in the normal world have always been considered a strategic resource of the state, being able to carry not only tanks.
            So the general is right, they just caught on late - no one can hear him. No one.
            Yes, and nothing. There is no longer any money, no other resources, no will, or probably already historical time to correct such a mistake.
            A curtain.
            But for endless feudal wars and NATO is not necessary, and it will not be.
        2. Bort radist 19 October 2015 14: 24 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Wend
          So collect all the weapons from your foreign bases and everything will be enough

          No way the boomerang restructuring is returning to the process that started this curve.
      2. Constructor1 19 October 2015 13: 48 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        I have no bridges, I have no trucks that can transport tanks, we do not have enough helicopters to do what we need to do.


        Well, pick up the monks and chapai to your island.
    3. go21zd45few 19 October 2015 14: 35 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Hodges, what are you and your soldiers doing in Europe, it’s time to return to your homeland in the USA, and there will be no problems.
    4. marlin1203 19 October 2015 15: 58 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Well, of course, but what did they think they would support transportation and providing military bases around the world? Previously, this could only be done by him and only in conditions of an unlimited emission of "green candy wrappers." soldier
  2. maxbrov74 19 October 2015 13: 24 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    Get out of Europe and the problems are solved by themselves.
    1. igordok 19 October 2015 13: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      "I have no bridges, I have no trucks ..."

      Everything went to battle lasers, F-35, F-22, etc. where you can make good money.
  3. Maksus 19 October 2015 13: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Maybe ask Gazprom? Or buy KAMAZ)))
    1. abrakadabre 19 October 2015 14: 26 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Nah ... Let Poroshenko take from long-term storage. In the next news, it was announced today that ukrofashists have up to 55 thousand units of trucks in these warehouses.
  4. Penetrator 19 October 2015 13: 25 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    In short, "Obama give a penny, otherwise fight nothing." Somewhere I already heard it smile
    1. kil 31 19 October 2015 13: 30 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      According to Hodges, it is necessary to supply transport helicopters, but no funds have been allocated for this at the Pentagon
      I understood the general perfectly, Lobbying the Chinook. I have only one question. Who paid for lobbying Boeing USA, Japanese, or Italian Chinook plant request
  5. aszzz888 19 October 2015 13: 25 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    , we don’t have enough helicopters to do what we need to do.


    Take in the nezalezhnoy - they otbubahali new rotorcraft Lion-1! wassat
    1. VadimSt 19 October 2015 16: 13 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Yes, they have no bridges, but brains!
  6. A-Sim 19 October 2015 13: 26 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Why move? It is necessary to deploy military operations not far from basing places.
  7. Mountain shooter 19 October 2015 13: 27 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    So there are a couple of divisions throughout Europe? Why are they waving their arms so actively? Are you not afraid of yourself? And then from their own coolness, their saliva will choke.
    In general, the song is familiar - give me money, more money, and then more ... Do not feed the horse.
    1. voyaka uh 19 October 2015 13: 51 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      They drastically reduced ground forces, tanks.
      Those. their offensive capabilities at zero.
      But aviation and ships are enough for defense.
      1. hydrox 19 October 2015 13: 58 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: voyaka uh
        But aviation and ships are enough for defense.

        Ships, speak?
        And what, have we already run out of Onyx, Caliber, Iskander and other tasty little things? Or do the Yankees really think that Iskander has a range of 600 km?
        They want to try the Russian "cabbage pie"?
        So after all, a long walk, all the ships fell into the southern seas (as if our bulk carriers did not go there!)
      2. Altona 19 October 2015 14: 13 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: voyaka uh
        They drastically reduced ground forces, tanks.

        ---------------------
        And what then did they transfer to Europe? In Latvia alone, 250 units of armored vehicles were dragged ...
        1. voyaka uh 19 October 2015 14: 35 New
          • 10
          • 0
          +10
          This is not a transfer from America to Europe,
          and transportation from one base to another.
          As you yourself understand, such a symbolic presence
          in the Baltic can’t stop the Russian army,
          but can create an attack on NATO forces.

          Remember Ossetia. Georgian army attacked the Russian
          company in Tsinval. Rota could not stop the Georgians (maximum,
          heroically perish), but caused a fair reaction of Russia military
          help "their own in trouble." And the Georgians already had to fight with an entire army.

          The same function and small contingents of NATO in the Baltic states.
          1. 33 Watcher 19 October 2015 15: 00 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            So it is understandable, but what have we forgotten in the Baltic states? Yes, and there is another example, the Crimea there were 20 thousand obdulyah, which did not stick their nose out of parts ...
          2. Altona 19 October 2015 18: 07 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The same function and small contingents of NATO in the Baltic states.

            --------------------
            The role of "canned food", a provocative presence to fuel conflict ... Do you think so?
      3. 33 Watcher 19 October 2015 14: 57 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Why should they attack? They are there Cerberus in Europe, so let them guard, and no ... laughing
  8. Tanker55 19 October 2015 13: 28 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    I don't have bridges, I don't have trucks
    , I would add that there are no BRAINS. Sit in your America-country of miracles and gays, make iPhones and that the thread is still useful for society and there is nothing to spread like an infection around the globe, then there will be enough dollars.
  9. McLuha-MacLeod 19 October 2015 13: 29 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    General learned from Piglet to whimper and beg for money
    1. Bort radist 19 October 2015 14: 26 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: McLooka-MacLeod
      general at Piglet learned to whimper and beg for money

      So - with whom you will be led by that and will be typed.
  10. Altona 19 October 2015 13: 30 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Capitalism is always inclined towards “optimization”, cost reduction, and the first to “optimize” are always collateral services that are in the enterprise, in the army ... Therefore, transport and logistics services have come under “circumcision” ... Apparently outsourcing, ordering vehicles on the side will cross ... "Did they order Gruzotaksi to Afghanistan?"
  11. katalonec2014 19 October 2015 13: 31 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The poor fellow wore it, he has no trucks ... sit there quietly and not touch.
  12. vitaliy707 19 October 2015 13: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    So the American army will destroy itself.
  13. Coconut Tima 19 October 2015 13: 33 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Ussaty - striped
    1. blind 19 October 2015 14: 39 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      with dubious spots
    2. voronbel53 19 October 2015 15: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The homeland requires heroes, and beggars have striped beggars ...
  14. pts-m 19 October 2015 13: 33 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    interesting. which country threatens a direct invasion of sshyshiya. they are in the circle of friends across the oceans and weep that they don’t have one. would sit in their North America and hawali fast food. otherwise they would run around the world with a torch, stirring up wars. so before the invhvarkta it is not so good.
  15. Lt. Air Force stock 19 October 2015 13: 36 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Ben Hodges - Commander of the US Military in Europe

    Mistake, Ben Hodges commander of the US Army in Europe.
    The commander of the European command of the United States and NATO, Philip Breedlove, all types and arms of the US and NATO countries in Europe are subordinate to him.
  16. Arandir 19 October 2015 13: 37 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    And you are sitting on your continent and no one will threaten you. Let military spending on the development of society. The peoples will free themselves from your yoke and, for starters, they will simply say thanks. Well, if someone still wants to take revenge, it will be difficult for him to do, given the geographical location and nuclear status.
    But you can set an example for the whole world by building a truly prosperous democratic society.
    And loving. Having tasted the power over the World and having drunk the blood, you cannot stop at all. So only the aspen stake shines on your prescription.
    Wang Helsing Xi Jingpinovich Putin.
    1. alexng 19 October 2015 14: 16 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Will not work. Since, if they reduce the military-industrial complex at least by 20%, then Sy.Shy.Puk will smash it into rubble. And in any case it will have to be cut ... So they rush about like a grandmother in a trolley with a basket of eggs.
  17. rotmistr60 19 October 2015 13: 39 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Such lamentations of American generals delight citizens of Russia. Here the question already arises - who is pulling someone into the arms race. The Americans lack the astronomical amount spent on their army today. So far, everything is going according to plan.
  18. walrus-a 19 October 2015 13: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    More soldiers, more trucks, more money in the pockets of a warrior from the pockets of American taxpayers, so you look and the United States will bend under the yoke of a heavy military budget like the USSR.
  19. raid14 19 October 2015 13: 42 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    I have no bridges, I have no trucks that can transport tanks, we do not have enough helicopters to do what we need to do.
    I have an old folder. Mom is old.
    The yurt became very thin ... it was raining,
    the roof is dripping ... Robe!
    ABOUT! The robe was not less, the robe was not,
    honestly my robe was not ...
    every jackal wears a bathrobe. I'm whole
    year without a robe went!
    One among strangers, one among strangers.
    1. Bort radist 19 October 2015 14: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: raid14
      The yurt became very thin ... it was raining,
      the roof is dripping ... Robe!

      An intelligent person told you - don’t go there .........
  20. sharp-lad 19 October 2015 13: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It seems that it’s time for Amers to begin to learn how to fight with skill, and not as before, golimally filling up the enemy with equipment and ammunition!
  21. xBoris 19 October 2015 13: 46 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Yes, let him ask ISIS, they will soon have no place for Toyta !!!!
  22. beer-youk 19 October 2015 13: 51 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Everything is simple, as on a collective farm. The Air Force requires an increase in funding, the Navy requires, but what is worse than ground? Chainsaws for cutting are the same for everyone, but the possibilities are different. It's a shame, right?
  23. Reptiloid 19 October 2015 13: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Something heart, somehow the heart was alarmed ...
    You need to retire!, He has nothing, he doesn’t need to know either.
  24. VadimSt 19 October 2015 14: 00 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Viewing the teachings and actions of the Russian army, for many Western generals, has become a real academy. And many ministers in skirts probably learned that in the army, in addition to ministers, bridges, cars and targets are still needed.
    1. sabakina 19 October 2015 20: 57 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Oh, by the way, yesterday I stole from the censor ... laughing
  25. Intrudeude 19 October 2015 14: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    poor NATO members, but did you have money for toilet paper and orange juice? warriors from the word is bad
  26. russmensch 19 October 2015 14: 04 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I have no bridges, I have no trucks that can transport tanks, we do not have enough helicopters to do what we need to do.

    Against the background of this universal cry, it is very strange to read about the budget amounts allocated by the US Armed Forces and read "analytical" articles about the power of their Armed Forces. I have a question - where did everything go? Really "sawed"?
    1. iConst 19 October 2015 14: 18 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: russmensch
      Against the background of this universal cry, it is very strange to read about the budget amounts allocated by the US Armed Forces and read "analytical" articles about the power of their Armed Forces.
      - This is easily explained: the ground forces in the USA are a stepdaughter, eating almost on a residual basis.
      They rule the Navy - they "devour" most of the budget. Following them is the infrastructure of numerous military bases.

      It’s more and more difficult for Amers to maintain their overgrown military apparatus.
      A buck comes up - the United States will disappear from the European and Middle Eastern arena. Already retreating.
  27. Xoyuschka 19 October 2015 14: 05 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    To transport tanks by trucks ???? I do not understand something? Explain who is in the know ...
    1. blind 19 October 2015 14: 35 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      everything is just a resource of the tank is limited and is calculated in hours and very expensive hours. it is economically feasible to transport tanks with tractors or until they reach a neighboring city and the engine life ends
    2. An60 19 October 2015 14: 40 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Motorcycles save armored vehicles.
  28. blind 19 October 2015 14: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    the main thing is that the toilet paper does not end and the diapers are delivered on time
  29. iouris 19 October 2015 14: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    We would have their "problems".
  30. MATROSKIN-53 19 October 2015 14: 52 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Eh, Hodges Hodges! Better get ready immediately captured. You will be alive, and fed, and drunk ... Russian good, they do not hit the bed.
    1. Stelth1985 20 October 2015 04: 59 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      At the expense of the latter ... I would not be so sure laughing . Americans are not warriors, but potential criminals. And criminals are kicked with kirzachs.

      For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
  31. manguest 19 October 2015 14: 58 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Given the huge number of bases and equipment located there requiring maintenance, regulations, updates to modern designs, any cost reduction disproportionately undermines the possibility of further use of all this stuff in the medium term.
  32. mpzss 19 October 2015 15: 01 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    we must invite them to exchange budgets for the army, ours, and us them. Well for a year! let's see how they will live !!!! what
  33. 77_78 19 October 2015 15: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Something Hodges began to worry often ... heh heh heh
  34. Mama_Cholli 19 October 2015 16: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    faster you need to leave the zone of dollar payments for energy. Toda general utters a whimper ...
  35. Turkir 19 October 2015 16: 23 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Come on, come on, come on!
    Bender Hodges.
  36. Leeder 19 October 2015 16: 51 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Yes, they just played with the soldiers.
    They began to forget that a modern rear needs a strong rear. Because for 1 tank you need several auxiliary ones (transport, fuel trucks, ARVs, bridge layers in the end)
    It is interesting in the event of a major conflict that their rear services are ready to provide all their troops within a few months?
  37. Vladimir 1964 19 October 2015 17: 31 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I have no bridges, I have no trucks that can transport tanks, we do not have enough helicopters to do what we need to do.


    Recently, Ben Hodges has had some problems, it’s even interesting, he would list specific shortcomings in the list, the guys from intelligence and analytics have less work. wassat
  38. ilyaches 19 October 2015 17: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Something pisses off the general.
  39. demandy1 19 October 2015 17: 48 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: ilyaches
    Something pisses off the general.
    It is difficult to soberly assess the situation when there are no bridges or brains.
  40. dima-fesko 19 October 2015 17: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I don't have bridges, I don't have trucks......
    You have no brains ...
  41. BARKHAN 19 October 2015 18: 52 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    They’ve been confused and panicked lately. Time is lost. Russia, like a skating rink from a hill ... can’t be stopped. It’s very nice to watch the rocks, when they see a video of blows to Ishil, they breathe a sigh of relief ... so far. that ... We closely monitor the fifth column. Russia can be destroyed only from the inside.
  42. Awaz 19 October 2015 19: 02 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    but what's wrong with infantry, for example, moving around Europe under its own power .. Well, with its feet. If you are already going to fight with a serious enemy, you need to understand that the enemy will not allow you to ride freely in armored personnel carriers or turntables in the front line ... You will need to walk with your legs and build bridges from improvised materials .. Beregchi needed a forest then)))
  43. ODERVIT 19 October 2015 20: 04 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    As everyone knows, our leadership is trying to fight corruption, embezzlement and cuts. Examples are well known to us. I am sure that it will take a long time to fight, but as always we will win. Why am I, but what’s the point is to make efforts and make “cuts” with weapons embedded in the camp of the adversary. They already have a lid, and with the new secret weapon they "cut" it several times faster. And it seems that it, a secret weapon, has begun to be used. Well, why scream "no money, no money." There we have them in abundance even when there was none, but nothing is moving forward and we still manage to joke. wink
  44. Retvizan 8 19 October 2015 20: 29 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And here I am talking about - we all know the expression of our wars: "we will stand to the last drop of blood!"
    Recently I watched a bourgeois pre-death film about the war and there, like German soldiers, they swore to the Führer that they would stand "to the last bullet"!
    Feel the difference? "to the last cartridge" (for them) or "to the last drop of blood" (for us).
    1. Awaz 19 October 2015 21: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      in Russia they say: die but do it. In the USA: make or die ... The difference is also noticeable
  45. gammipapa 19 October 2015 21: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Do not worry the Americans like that, there is a very good way out. Call Uncle Vova, let him lend you for a short while our chief specialist in army affairs, Comrade Serdyukov, he is just not very busy right now and will be able to competently resolve all difficult issues.
  46. TanakaKenshin 20 October 2015 00: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Angry Russian menacingly brewing tea and viciously drinking it and eating a bagel! We need to build up the NATO contingent in Europe, build a bridge, build a missile defense system! Oh Niet, he does away with the bagel and take up the poor, defenseless cheesecake!

    Except for jokes, can anyone from the NATO countries explain what this crowd of parasites does in Europe? And I especially want to know from some of the closest neighbors (Lithuania, Poland and others like them) - why the hell did they give us up? But there is no industry, there are no minerals, it is populated by Russophobes ... And then they yell a little - “Russian aggression is on the verge, Russia is sneaking to the borders of Europe!”, And why are they yelling?

    Not foreign policy, but some kind of children's horror story about a coffin on wheels ... "Latvia, Putin on wheels found your area ... Save yourself Latvia, Putin on wheels found your street ..."
  47. garrikz 20 October 2015 02: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I have no bridges, I have no trucks that can transport tanks, we do not have enough helicopters to do what we need to do.
    And most importantly (behind the scenes): There will be nothing to "saw".
  48. jPilot 20 October 2015 03: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, General Hodges, you’ve already decided on “this life” to invest in armed coups, support for dillies and other similar juntas, or spend money on trucks and helicopters, even your printing press cannot allow this.
  49. Reptiloid 20 October 2015 07: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Barkhan
    They’ve been confused and panicked lately. Time is lost. Russia, like a skating rink from a hill ... can’t be stopped. It’s very nice to watch the rocks, when they see a video of blows to Ishil, they breathe a sigh of relief ... so far. that ... We closely monitor the fifth column. Russia can be destroyed only from the inside.

    I’m watching. Looking around, I’m watching. Not that there is a real 5 column around me, as well as such small “sufferers” and threads due to an “erroneous” policy. I have several options in advance that I perfectly own. These are several options - enough, since there are several options for nagging. Topics: Syria and pensions, Syria and medicine, Syria and Ukraine, just nagging.