The head of China: China has repeatedly said it is conducting a policy of defensive nature

24
PRC Chairman Xi Jinping said that China remains the “driving force” of cooperation in the world and does not seek to assume the role of “world gendarme”, and defense remains the main focus of foreign policy, the newspaper writes "Sight".



According to Xi Jinping, the problems of other states should be solved by their peoples, and the world's problems through consultations between them.

The PRC Chairman noted that China does not plan to interfere in the internal affairs of other states, and international regional conflicts should be resolved by peaceful means.

“China has repeatedly stated that it is pursuing a defensive policy and will never seek hegemony, participate in expansion or impose its will on others,” he stressed.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    19 October 2015 09: 09
    The head of China: China has repeatedly said it is conducting a policy of defensive nature

    This is alarming. The impression is that they want to convince us of this. And the request of England to help her in Syria is very much like a multi-path.
    1. +16
      19 October 2015 09: 14
      The dragon is watching ... Everyone expected that he would clash with the Bald Eagle, but the Dragon decided to make it wiser, knowing that he had not yet fully matured, the Dragon supported the Bear who entered the battle with the Bald Eagle. Of course, the Dragon supports the Bear both politically and financially, for he understands that the more the Bear exhausts the Bald Eagle, the more secure the Dragon himself will feel. The Dragon will not let the Bear die, because if the Bald Eagle wins him in the battle, he will immediately "take up" the Dragon ... The question is that when the Dragon will get strong enough to challenge both the Bald Eagle and the Bear ) but this is a completely different story and until then a lot of water will leak ...
      1. +4
        19 October 2015 09: 21
        Quote: Now we are free
        it can challenge both the Bald Eagle and the Bear

        The main thing is not to enter into an open confrontation not with the eagle, much less with the allied dragon.
        That's how much it will come out, the question. A bald eagle has already climbed to us, in Ukraine (
      2. +2
        19 October 2015 12: 21
        Quote: Now we are free
        The dragon is watching ...


        Well, Dear Iskander, I wrapped it up like this, better than a "thousand and one nights"!
        But interesting. Yes good hi
      3. 0
        19 October 2015 12: 33
        Namely, we are accumulating strength "on the sly" and taking the place of the world hegemon.
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      19 October 2015 09: 17
      Not a single world leader, if he is not a complete schizophrenic, would not say from the rostrum to the whole world: "People! Pi to you all ...!" laughing
      1. +2
        19 October 2015 09: 41
        Quote: Finches
        Not a single world leader, if he is not a complete schizophrenic, would not say from the rostrum to the whole world: "People! Pi to you all ...!" laughing

        Well, why, here Americans last twenty years, that's just what they say. And China, in the past, said that Siberia is their land. It didn’t work out right away, they’ll try secretly. smile

        Looking at the cons, oh, how many China there are. lol
      2. +1
        19 October 2015 09: 45
        Nevertheless, the Americans have been saying this all their lives, well, and the satellites are not far behind, so that it does not say anything, even animals have such things when they threaten to protect. Therefore, there is much to argue about and not always we will be right.
    3. +2
      19 October 2015 09: 22
      Quote: Frigate
      This is alarming. It seems that they want to convince us of this.

      As if not to relate to M. Weller, but, I'm afraid, his words will become prophetic: "The Chinese suffering from a lack of living space are smart, patient and persistent. Their sharp-sighted, narrow-minded eyes politely look across the Cupid. The East has learned to penetrate the remoteness of time and space .. And in the long run, where the state flows and divides, like an amoeba, we will not go anywhere from the redistribution of territories. "
      I would not want to ...
      1. +2
        19 October 2015 09: 53
        In an area of ​​almost 10 million square kilometers (third in the world), nearly 1,4 billion people live.
        If you translate into density, you get 140 people per square kilometer.
        It is not our fault that they live crowded in the eastern and southern regions.
        Well, they do not like cold.
        In the cold, the Chinese do not breed.
        And now let's transfer the Chinese to Yakutia.
        How many will be left for next season?

        The Chinese, for about 4 thousand years, have been watching and are looking both through Cupid, and through Gobi and Khingan.
        Ну и что?
        The Chinese still have a question for each other: where do you live inside the Wall or behind the Wall?
        All that is behind the Wall is the alien land of the Chinese.

        And the Chinese are now carefully watching the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, the actions of our military, the behavior of Putin, the reaction of the Russian people.
        They even look at tank biathlon.
        And through the prism of this knowledge they draw the RIGHT conclusions for themselves.

        The Chinese nation is deprived of our creative fervor and our militancy.

        One fact that 600 Cossacks managed to conquer Siberia - this says a lot.
        So the dragon grew old, wiser and lazy.
        The main thing is not to give him fresh blood.
        And everything will be ok!
        1. +1
          19 October 2015 12: 22
          In many ways I want to agree with you. In addition, China is actively involved in Africa. And as regards the Far East, it is one thing to conduct trade and to infiltrate these territories with a quiet glanders. Another thing is to make sharp movements against Russia, which China does not allow itself. They are better off proposing to Russia the joint development of the Far East (by investments, slave. Force), than to take some drastic steps and even more so actions.
          1. 0
            19 October 2015 15: 44
            As supporters of the "Chinese threat" shout, China should have seized Mongolia, Burma and other small things long ago !!!
        2. 0
          19 October 2015 15: 41
          Czech population density is the same as in China! The population mainly lives not in megacities (the largest city of Prague, as many as 1,2 million inhabitants), but in small towns of 5-10-15-30 thousand people, by Russian standards, in villages .... Most of the territory not populated, forests, fields, hills .... Hares and roe deer even approach the outskirts of cities ...
      2. 0
        19 October 2015 15: 31
        The population density in England, Germany, France, Israel, Japan is 1,5-2-2,5 times greater than in China .... This is statistics ....
  2. +5
    19 October 2015 09: 09
    This is in response to a request from Cameron to ask us for Britain in Syria.
    Like we are not in business, we are for peace.
  3. +3
    19 October 2015 09: 10
    "China has repeatedly stated that it is pursuing a defensive policy and will never strive for hegemony, participate in expansion, or impose its will on others."

    That would be the wisdom "striped" ...
  4. +3
    19 October 2015 09: 14
    Well said. But here armaments and builds and buys. Probably just in case.
    1. 0
      19 October 2015 15: 44
      Want peace, get ready for war ...
  5. +1
    19 October 2015 09: 14
    China, of course, is an adequate moan and in many cases a geopolitical ally, but it should not be underestimated either. At any moment, they can remember the Khubilai inheritance))
    At a critical moment, only two reliable allies will help us, our army and navy.
  6. +3
    19 October 2015 09: 19
    Almost everything depends on the group in power. While there is a lag in technology and Comrade X is talking about an armored train on the siding, but Russia is selling strategic technology and when another Comrade arrives, it can start talking about, for example, the territories of the Far East and Siberia ... Anything is possible.
    It’s criminal for us to relax and kiss our gums.
    1. 0
      19 October 2015 15: 46
      The power transfer system does not allow the appearance of random people such as Gorbachev, drunk ...
  7. +3
    19 October 2015 09: 30
    However, the Chinese leader would later say that attack is the best way of defense.
  8. +2
    19 October 2015 09: 40
    I would say - not defensive, but expectant. The river, the corpse of the enemy, all that. And then we will "assimilate" those who remain. Something like this.
  9. +2
    19 October 2015 09: 45
    Enough wishful thinking ....
  10. +7
    19 October 2015 09: 51
    Such friends (partners) as the Chinese are much more dangerous and insidious. Than frank enemies. You can smell the poison behind smiles and a quiet dragon hiss. To wait for the storm is the passive betrayal of the allies. But there’s always something for every cunning ass .. .For me personally, they are aliens. Writing, culture, mentality, treachery ... With all our wishes, we have little to do with the general ...
    1. +5
      19 October 2015 10: 00
      I support. You are a plus from me.
    2. 0
      19 October 2015 16: 02
      Why didn’t China conquer the known world in the early to mid-15th century, when it was at the peak of power, was a leader in science, technology, had an economy half the world’s, had a fleet larger, more technologically advanced and stronger than all the fleets of the world combined ?????? ? The answer is simple: war is an expensive, resource-consuming event that needs to be conquered, and it is even more expensive and impossible in principle (not a single empire in history managed to keep the conquered for a long time, moreover, the empire died in such attempts), not worth it ...