Military Review

Media: Cameron will ask Beijing to support the plans of London on the bombing of positions of the IG in Syria

103
The Sunday Mirror announced David Cameron’s intention to support the British government’s plans to send airplanes to Syria to attack IG facilities.




"He (Cameron) will take advantage of the state visit of Chinese leader Xi Jinping, starting tomorrow (October 19), to ask for support in the fight against Islamic State," the newspaper quoted. Look.

According to the publication, Cameron "is interested in avoiding any clashes of Russian fighters and the Royal Air Force, and for this reason he hopes that Xi Jinping will be able to use his influence on Moscow to convince the Russian side not to stand in the way of the implementation of British plans in Syria .

"The UK plans to make its goal only the IG," the article says. In addition, the Premier wants to “enlist the guarantees of the official Beijing that China will not interfere with (the steps) of the UK in the UN”.

The Vzglyad reminds that last fall the British Parliament approved the operation of the Royal Air Force only in Iraq. The document does not provide for the participation of the United Kingdom in Syria.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Irokez
    Irokez 18 October 2015 12: 24 New
    37
    Beijing and without you, Comrade "Cameroot" knows what to do.
    1. yan 2015
      yan 2015 18 October 2015 12: 28 New
      11
      exactly. as they say, whose cow would mumble ... if only your Cameron was silent. we await Comrade Xi's answer.
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 18 October 2015 12: 36 New
        26
        I don’t understand at all: will Cameron ask Beijing to support London’s plan?
        What does Beijing have to do with it?
        Why does London support Beijing in this matter?

        This is the type I would ask some interlocutor to support my plans for the repair of the apartment!
        I would have made it anyway!
        But why do I need his approval ???

        1. Halfunra
          Halfunra 18 October 2015 12: 51 New
          26
          So the rollback to Russia continues. Not whining, so croaking.
          Uncle Xi should somehow influence Moscow. And then God forbid we interrupt their planes.
          Question? And did Syria allow them to fly and bomb in their country? hi
          1. Coconut Tima
            Coconut Tima 18 October 2015 14: 42 New
            22
            London is going to ask the Chinese: "Please tell the Russians that we also want to participate in the banquet. Well, we also seem to be great - right? .. We also want to bomb the Islamists a little. Let the Russians not shoot down our planes - okay? .. Well, somehow influence them, you have a good relationship - let them not humiliate us much and not publicly send us to the stump of love. Otherwise we are very offended ... "
            Politikus.ru
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 18 October 2015 15: 20 New
              11
              Quote from the article
              Cameron "is interested in ... convincing the Russian side not to stand in the way of the implementation of British plans in Syria."
              А UK plans for approaching victory over Islamic militants in Syria - this (as always with the British towards the end of any historical war) catch the winners - under the liberation influence of Russia in Syria - imagine a certain land "piece" of Syria itself for its neocolonies! I wonder what piece of Syria the British will ask themselves?
              1. Karlovar
                Karlovar 18 October 2015 16: 04 New
                0
                I'm afraid it won’t get to this ...
              2. Nymp
                Nymp 18 October 2015 16: 04 New
                +8
                Quote: Tatiana
                And in the plans of Great Britain, with the approaching victory over the Islamic militants in Syria, this (as always with the British towards the end of any historical war) has time to grab from the winners - under the influence of Russia's liberation influence in Syria - some sort of specific land "piece" of Syria itself your neocolonies!

                I completely agree with you, I even wanted to add it to comets. Anglo-Saxons haunted the success of Russia in the war on terrorism! They need to belittle the edge of the success of the Russian Federation, so that there is reason to say that Russia could not cope, they had to help the poor Russians. This is not our fantasy with you, we see how they interpret the results of the Second World War.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. varov14
            varov14 19 October 2015 00: 12 New
            0
            You don’t understand the gentlemen, they just want to ask the Chinese to influence us, not to take off our planes in Syria when they fly over Iraq, the countries are nearby and it scares them very much, suddenly they accidentally touch the wing.
        2. 34 region
          34 region 18 October 2015 12: 54 New
          +1
          Can they stick? Like we are allies. So slowly digging under the USA.
        3. ZU-23
          ZU-23 18 October 2015 12: 59 New
          +9
          They say that Russia will be a vassal of China, and right away they themselves understand that they are asking China for support, I hope that Xi will tell them that you had time to bomb the igles, or advise you to talk to Russia about this.
        4. dmi.pris
          dmi.pris 18 October 2015 13: 00 New
          +4
          Yes, it’s just that these wise men flush directly to the GDP, they believe that they will immediately be sent to a damn thing.
          Quote: Baikonur
          I don’t understand at all: will Cameron ask Beijing to support London’s plan?
          What does Beijing have to do with it?
          Why does London support Beijing in this matter?

          This is the type I would ask some interlocutor to support my plans for the repair of the apartment!
          I would have made it anyway!
          But why do I need his approval ???
        5. Wlad
          Wlad 18 October 2015 13: 15 New
          31
          Beijing is very much to do with it! Russia claims that the actions of the coalition in Syria are illegal and contrary to International Law. Beijing supports Russia in the UN Security Council on issues related to Syria. Thus, no Resolutions in the Security Council on Syria beneficial to the West can pass. They will not pass without China, but in this case, you can shout to the whole world that everyone is "for", only Russia is "against".
          So shaves spin (not on their own initiative, of course) to try to drive a wedge, but at the same time justify their actions. I think so...
          1. ROD VDVshny
            ROD VDVshny 18 October 2015 13: 36 New
            +8
            VVP has repeatedly stated that all flights "in a dream and in reality" with the aim of supporting the highly moderate, imbecile, imbecile, the bombing of power substations, the destruction of excavators are ILLEGAL !!!
            Only the aerospace forces of the Russian Federation destroy terrorists.
            The Englishman is jolting - he has no legal right to fly there. Therefore, he wants to ask the Chinese to help and ask Moscow "in its own way."
          2. Alexander_
            Alexander_ 18 October 2015 13: 58 New
            +4
            Dumb setup for China.
        6. uralex
          uralex 18 October 2015 13: 23 New
          +4
          Quote: Baikonur
          This is the type I would ask some interlocutor to support my plans for the repair of the apartment!
          I would have made it anyway!
          But why do I need his approval ???

          Moreover, permission from a neighbor from another house, about repairing a neighbor’s apartment from another entrance ...
        7. kil 31
          kil 31 18 October 2015 13: 56 New
          +5
          Quote: Baikonur
          I don’t understand at all: will Cameron ask Beijing to support London’s plan?
          What does Beijing have to do with it?
          Why does London support Beijing in this matter?

          This is the type I would ask some interlocutor to support my plans for the repair of the apartment!
          I would have made it anyway!
          But why do I need his approval ???

          I agree with you completely. The capitalists will ask the hated komunyaks, so that the komunyaks talk with the hated komunyaks, who simply say that they are not komunyaks, but capitalists, but they lie, since they were komunyaks and remained so that the capitalists could calmly do anti. Komunyak democratization with bombs in the Middle East and repainted komunyaki were not indignant. That's how London bent.
        8. Awaz
          Awaz 18 October 2015 14: 42 New
          +1
          In any case, all the money in the world is managed from London. China, as if trying to look independent, is very dependent on London and the United States too. And therefore it is not clear yet who is holding whom by the balls. But the call to China to support the British version of the bombing is an attempt to put pressure on Russia. Not that Russia and China are great friends, but if China joins the pro-Russian coalition rather than the Anglo-American coalition, it will have some problems. And if China joins the Anglo-American coalition, it will be like an indicative flogging for Russia, that no one wants to get involved with you except as "outcasts" like Hezbollah Iran and so on.
          1. Karlovar
            Karlovar 18 October 2015 16: 01 New
            +2
            The Chinese and the Americans exchanged pleasantries a couple of months ago: an explosion in Tyanjin — explosions at 3 chemical plants in the USA — explosions at 3 chemical plants in the PRC — shaking at the Shanghai Stock Exchange — shaking at the New York Stock Exchange, selling Chinese debt securities on China hundreds of billions, explosions at an American military base in Japan, then silence ... a truce along the way .... the pressure is over, blown away ....
        9. The comment was deleted.
        10. The comment was deleted.
        11. crumb
          crumb 18 October 2015 16: 37 New
          0
          Well, it's kind of without Beijing Londongrad can not solve anything at all !!!!!!!! wink
        12. unsinkable
          unsinkable 18 October 2015 16: 52 New
          +2
          Quote: Baikonur
          Why does London support Beijing in this matter?

          I think that this is done in order to draw China into the sphere of its business, to drive a wedge between Russia and China. And the second: stupidity does not allow you to turn directly to Russia, so that the black-footed uncle would not think that the arrogant Saxons will work with Russia.
        13. ASG7
          ASG7 18 October 2015 17: 20 New
          +2
          He just wants to put his pig (beloved) under Mr. X. laughing
        14. The comment was deleted.
        15. Lelek
          Lelek 18 October 2015 19: 56 New
          +2
          Quote: Baikonur
          Why does London support Beijing in this matter?


          Another verbal web of Anglo-Saxon (or verbal diarrhea - as you like).
          Everything is being done in order to narrow the scope of the Russian "field of action" and to preserve its offspring-monster ISIS. For this, even in front of the Chinese leader, they are ready to dance a polka-butterfly. yes
        16. Monos
          Monos 18 October 2015 22: 38 New
          +5
          http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/225/vuwq355.jpg
      2. askort154
        askort154 18 October 2015 12: 40 New
        +7
        yan 2015 .... here it is. as they say, whose cow would moan .. if only your Cameron was silent. We wait for the answer of Comrade Xi.

        Actually, he "trained" not on cows, but on pigs.
        1. avg
          avg 18 October 2015 12: 57 New
          +4
          That licks, already sucks ... what
          when it’s necessary to shave, it’s not necessary to invent an excuse.
        2. maxcor1974
          maxcor1974 18 October 2015 16: 24 New
          0
          Actually, he "trained" not on cows, but on pigs.

          I’ll correct it, because at the time of intimacy the pig was dead, it would be more correct to say that Cameron had a connection with pork ...
      3. INVESTOR
        INVESTOR 18 October 2015 12: 43 New
        +5
        "The UK plans to make its goal only the IG," the article says. In addition, the Premier wants to “enlist the guarantees of the official Beijing that China will not interfere with (the steps) of the UK in the UN”.

        And also apologize for the opium wars and other nasty things, the cunning Chinese will listen and smile ..)))
        1. 34 region
          34 region 18 October 2015 12: 58 New
          +3
          China will not impede Britain’s moves. So unobtrusively put pressure on China. No need to veto the UN. We must go to the wake of London.
        2. Karlovar
          Karlovar 18 October 2015 13: 06 New
          +4
          The Chinese did not forget the Opium Wars !!! Like the Japanese (patriotic elites) did not forget Hiroshima and Nagasaki ... Like the Vietnamese did not forget who fired them with napalm ... Until only the time came to bill ...
      4. Alexey Boukin
        Alexey Boukin 18 October 2015 14: 02 New
        +1
        As we see, they began to turn to China with a bow! Everything goes on as usual ...
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. Vend
      Vend 18 October 2015 12: 28 New
      18
      Britain is trying to save the ISIS project.
      1. The lead
        The lead 18 October 2015 12: 30 New
        +7
        But the opinion of the Syrian people, Cameron is not interested?
        1. Karlovar
          Karlovar 18 October 2015 12: 36 New
          +3
          He somehow didn’t think about it ..., he braked a bit .. Sometimes a guy is worried ...
        2. Rader
          Rader 18 October 2015 12: 54 New
          +2
          Quote: Lead
          But the opinion of the Syrian people, Cameron is not interested?


          He is not interested in the opinion of his people, it is better to keep silent about the Syrian and other peoples ...
      2. Karlovar
        Karlovar 18 October 2015 12: 34 New
        +3
        Or the second, to join the coalition of future winners of the IG ....
      3. 34 region
        34 region 18 October 2015 12: 59 New
        +1
        Yes, it’s rather trying to save itself before it’s too late. Extra witnesses will be removed along the way. As always, only business!
    3. mirag2
      mirag2 18 October 2015 12: 29 New
      +3
      To the general background, I think the topic will be interesting:
      Slavic Corps and Wagner PMCs in Syria:
      A set of volunteers who want to risk their heads for Bashar al-Assad is open in Russia. The Fontanka learned how to get to war, how much the life of a soldier of fortune costs, and what does the famous German mystic anti-Semite have to do with it.
      more on the liberal insider: http: //www.fontanka.ru/2015/10/16/118/
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Aleks28
      Aleks28 18 October 2015 12: 37 New
      +2
      Quote: Irokez
      Beijing and without you, Comrade "Cameroot" knows what to do.

      The Chinese are still the same ... We need to wait for the results. Of course it will be shitty if the Chinese agree ..
    6. vovanpain
      vovanpain 18 October 2015 12: 45 New
      +9
      it’s like sharing a wedding cake, I don’t have time to approach, but they wouldn’t touch my piece. And what about Beijing? What’s it? Watching Syria, is it better to turn to Moscow then, and Washington’s room rottweiler.
    7. War and Peace
      War and Peace 18 October 2015 12: 57 New
      +1
      Media: Cameron will ask Beijing to support the plans of London on the bombing of positions of the IG in Syria


      Beijing did not agree with Cameron, Anglic planes bombed Syria. This is called coherent international politics ...
    8. Finches
      Finches 18 October 2015 13: 18 New
      +1
      I think that the Anglo-Saxons will now, through the leader of the PRC, convey to Moscow some of their wishes and proposals! They will offer some kind of compromise ... Because they understand that they started to lose strategically in Syria - maybe they will offer recognition of Crimea and Donbass for Assad’s drain? Which, however, is not the best compromise for us!
    9. viktor561
      viktor561 18 October 2015 23: 08 New
      0
      It’s a bad thing for Cameron if he asks Beijing to help, so that Russian pilots do not fuck the Royal Air Force in the sky of Syria
    10. gor530
      gor530 19 October 2015 01: 04 New
      0
      Cameron will ask Beijing to support London's plans to bomb ISIS positions in Syria

      I would say in a different way: Cameron will ask China to sell normal sights, maybe then the British pilots will start to hit the IS.
    11. Drmadfisher
      Drmadfisher 19 October 2015 01: 10 New
      0
      somehow I don’t understand from these camerons, but who did they bomb before (and why the blessing of China?)
  2. tatarin_ru
    tatarin_ru 18 October 2015 12: 25 New
    +8
    As many as two bombers will destroy one escalator and some kind of hospital, after which Cameron will say that he almost defeated the IS alone.

    But the rhetoric of the defective begins to change - they begin to ask permission.
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 12: 38 New
      +7
      Permissions began to be asked through the mediation of China from Russia !!! ... Something big died in Washington ...
      1. Genry
        Genry 18 October 2015 12: 55 New
        +1
        Here lies another ...
        Could not in Iraq, now they’re not being able to reach Syria.
        Inconsistency!
      2. Luga
        Luga 18 October 2015 13: 03 New
        +7
        Quote: tatarin_ru
        But the rhetoric of the defective begins to change - they begin to ask permission.

        Quote: tatarin_ru
        Permissions began to be asked through the mediation of China from Russia !!! ...

        How else? Without permission is scary, and asking permission is even more scary. For 20 years, they kicked a sleeping bear and fired at him from around the corner when he woke up. And now I felt the urge to go to the forest again. It's kind of dumb without permission ("I'm ochuyu, Slavik"), but to ask permission, you have to approach the bear ... So they send a messenger: can we also ... this ... well ... into the forest?

        Quote: Karlovar
        Something big died in Washington ...

        laughing hi
        There is nothing large left. Bigger than a rat, well, maybe the biggest one is a skunk. With all its features laughing
  3. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 18 October 2015 12: 26 New
    38
    Asks ... This is already interesting! In general ...
  4. Wiruz
    Wiruz 18 October 2015 12: 27 New
    +7
    Looks very bad at the inhabitants of foggy Albion, if they turn to China for help what
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 18 October 2015 12: 56 New
      +2
      It seems that the inhabitants of foggy Albion are doing very bad things if they turn to China for help,
      Usually: this is to say later, we plowed.
  5. roskot
    roskot 18 October 2015 12: 27 New
    +7
    But talking to Moscow yourself is weak. Beijing was needed. The British Chitoseurs. All by the wrong hands.
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 12: 41 New
      +3
      He is shy ...
  6. Nevsky_ZU
    Nevsky_ZU 18 October 2015 12: 27 New
    +5
    and for this reason he hopes that Xi Jinping will be able to use his influence on Moscow in order to convince the Russian side not to stand in the way of the implementation of British plans in Syria. ”


    Well, well ... even Taiwan, do not forget to call in a coalition for a couple with Japan. Something shrinking public leaders of the Anglo-Saxons. What did the real shadow gentlemen conceive there, or did the center of gravity shift from the West, and capitalism has no homeland? Eh, it is not clear request
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 12: 57 New
      +3
      Did Vremya Pokazhet, October 16, pay attention to the changed rhetoric of our local liberals Nadezhdin and another of his compatriots with a sly grin on her face? So, with insinuating voices, they agitated, no less, for the prospect of Russia joining the EU !!! Which, in their opinion and their master, would mean a turn of Russia from the eastern (Chinese) vector. It can be seen that they received new training manuals from the owner! Looks like the owner strongly insists on the Russian-Chinese rapprochement !!!
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 18 October 2015 12: 28 New
    +8
    Normal position of the small brittons. Though in words, but to embroil Russia with China. They have been spoiling Russia for several hundred years, as they can, have lost their empire, but their ambitions, ambitions. IMHO, China will simply remain silent, as usual.
  8. udincev
    udincev 18 October 2015 12: 29 New
    +8
    In addition, the prime minister wants to “secure official Beijing’s guarantees that China will not impede (steps) Britain to the UN
    Obviously, some kind of dirty trick is plotted if the UN is afraid.
    1. Rader
      Rader 18 October 2015 13: 02 New
      +1
      Quote: udincev
      In addition, the prime minister wants to “secure official Beijing’s guarantees that China will not impede (steps) Britain to the UN
      Obviously, some kind of dirty trick is plotted if the UN is afraid.


      Do not go to the fortuneteller ... But this is exactly what Kemiron wants from C, I still do not understand what Any guarantees of non-compliance with the UK Air Force by the Russian Air Force? And what does China have to do with it ???
  9. BLOND
    BLOND 18 October 2015 12: 30 New
    +4
    Ha ha ha !!!
    It is like:
    David Cameron to Beijing - Let's be friends in Syria, but against Russia !?
  10. yan 2015
    yan 2015 18 October 2015 12: 31 New
    +3
    I don’t think that Chinese friends are so naive. so modestly they will smile and nod their heads. and condemn .. my yours do not understand.
  11. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir 18 October 2015 12: 31 New
    +2
    And how will the cameron ask? "Whimper". kneeling? And why is it that the British can "stand in the way of the implementation of Russian plans in Syria, while the Russians cannot stand in the way of the implementation of the British? Wouldn't the cameron go ...? Or let him crawl on our belly and beg Putin!"
  12. Frigate
    Frigate 18 October 2015 12: 31 New
    +7
    According to the publication, Cameron "is interested in avoiding any clashes of Russian fighters and the Royal Air Force, and for this reason he hopes that Xi Jinping will be able to use his influence on Moscow to convince the Russian side not to stand in the way of the implementation of British plans in Syria .

    Looks like their pilots really got into a mess, despite the permission to open fire on Russian planes. Looks on deep channels, they are the Russian Foreign Ministry, someone said. ))))
  13. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 18 October 2015 12: 34 New
    +4
    "... Cameron" is interested in avoiding any skirmishes between Russian fighters and the RAF ... "
    Really! And I even know why he is interested. And I even know that the Royal Air Force pilots are also interested in avoiding any clashes with Russian fighters. Everyone wants to live! And the Indians have recently demonstrated the prospects of our machines clearly.
  14. NKV
    NKV 18 October 2015 12: 34 New
    +5
    What is so difficult? Let Xi Jingping explain to this malachol that the only way to send British planes to Syria is to agree with Putin, all the more so he invited everyone to join his coalition!
    1. demoniac1666
      demoniac1666 18 October 2015 13: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: NKV
      What is so difficult? Let Xi Jingping explain to this malachol that the only way to send British planes to Syria is to agree with Putin, all the more so he invited everyone to join his coalition!

      Or maybe he wants to use the Chinese as mediators in negotiations with Comrade Putin? It’s direct, it’s bothering)))))))))))))) Type: Putin is the aggressor and all that))) Well, or an attempt to drive a wedge between us and China, break the coalition))))))))))) We will see)))) hi
    2. 34 region
      34 region 18 October 2015 13: 05 New
      +3
      Or maybe we do not need such helpers. Then they will share the cake. We also participated in the race! We know their participation, open beer on the ski run!
    3. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 13: 12 New
      +2
      Most likely it will...
  15. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 18 October 2015 12: 37 New
    +5
    Small-shaven bombs will go to bow. Here's the news. And what do you want to do with us?
  16. Stinger
    Stinger 18 October 2015 12: 38 New
    +4
    He clearly conceived something nasty and wants China to support this nasty thing in the UN Security Council, and not use the veto. Leopard change his spots. We know these "implementation of British plans in Syria."
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 13: 14 New
      0
      In the UN Security Council and one Russian veto is enough ... It seems that Cameron just ponte before the voters ...
  17. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 18 October 2015 12: 38 New
    +3
    According to the publication, Cameron "is interested in avoiding any clashes of Russian fighters and the Royal Air Force, and for this reason he hopes that Xi Jinping will be able to use his influence on Moscow to convince the Russian side not to stand in the way of the implementation of British plans in Syria .


    As an option, you can also consider the version of an attempt to "be in time for the division of the pie", Russia's successes clearly enough guarantee the defeat of ISIS in Syria, the Anglo-Saxons cannot but participate at least in the final, so that later it would be like in the joke "We plowed, I and the tractor" ...

    Somehow as an option. hi
  18. Dezinto
    Dezinto 18 October 2015 12: 40 New
    +1
    Want to bomb "ig", bomb! Someone will bother you? What are these complex quirks? They are already trying to turn everything around so that they say they want to destroy terrorists and the Russian Air Force can start shooting them down!?!? So what?
  19. mamont5
    mamont5 18 October 2015 12: 41 New
    +3
    Quote: Alex28
    Quote: Irokez
    Beijing and without you, Comrade "Cameroot" knows what to do.

    The Chinese are still the same ... We need to wait for the results. Of course it will be shitty if the Chinese agree ..

    What will they agree to? Talk to GDP? So it’s always welcome. What about the results? Excuse me...
    1. Aleks28
      Aleks28 18 October 2015 12: 44 New
      0
      Quote: mamont5
      What will they agree to? Talk to GDP? So it’s always welcome. What about the results? Excuse me...

      Look deeper .. A conversation with Putin is not a goal ..
    2. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 13: 18 New
      -1
      The Chinese will say: Uncle Vova gave you, verbatim, quote, you went to ......
  20. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 18 October 2015 12: 43 New
    +5
    Well done, damn it! Again they try to cling to someone else’s glory, open a second front ?! Ghouls, their mother!
  21. piter-tank
    piter-tank 18 October 2015 12: 43 New
    +3
    The Naglo-Saxons clearly lost touch with reality, with international law. In order to bomb Syria, they talk with China! Have you tried to negotiate with Assad? I'm losing weight with them!
    1. Zumich
      Zumich 18 October 2015 13: 06 New
      +1
      I fully support, about the lawful power of Syria, complete Ignor, REVEALED.
      It is the same if Russia or another country speaks at its maximum at the UN, at least creates a coalition and bombs the United States in defense of the Indians dying on the reservation, the analogy is complete.
  22. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 18 October 2015 12: 43 New
    +1
    C of course will not send directly ... But I think the GDP will call!
  23. cniza
    cniza 18 October 2015 12: 51 New
    +4
    [quote = Baikonur] I did not understand at all: will Cameron ask Beijing to support the London plan?
    What does Beijing have to do with it?
    Why does London support Beijing in this matter?

    And why not ask Assad, they think they are confused to drive a wedge between Russia and China.
  24. sabakina
    sabakina 18 October 2015 12: 52 New
    +3
    Media: Cameron asks Beijing to support London's plans for bombardment of IG positions In Syria

    Khe khe khe ... Excuse me, but what if London bombed the coalition for a year?
    And secondly. I have some kind of de javu ... In 1944, what was it like?
    1. 34 region
      34 region 18 October 2015 13: 09 New
      0
      It was. And they liked it so much that they want to repeat it. Someone else's hands! Someone works, fights, and someone shares and takes away. There is such a worldview, divide and take away.
  25. moskowit
    moskowit 18 October 2015 12: 57 New
    0
    Such casuistry that you are amazed ... What is the proverb ?: "And cancer necks separately ..."
  26. Fox_1959
    Fox_1959 18 October 2015 13: 04 New
    +1
    to convince the Russian side not to stand in the way of the implementation of British plans in Syria

    There was nothing to poke your dick in a pig’s mouth. Now to such a pig ... only live near the bucket
  27. NKV
    NKV 18 October 2015 13: 13 New
    +3
    Still, it was Uncle Vova who specifically pinched their tail, since they don’t already know who to kiss the gum with)
  28. EDDI 76
    EDDI 76 18 October 2015 13: 16 New
    +2
    and Volodya do not have enough courage to ask? quite brains in the fog in the English
  29. Junior, I
    Junior, I 18 October 2015 13: 27 New
    +3
    Cool, they are trying to push us with their foreheads with the Chinese! At the same time remove us from Syria. It’s smart, but not with us and the Chinese to do such a trick.
    All the same, a hard drug is present in their diet.
  30. morozik
    morozik 18 October 2015 13: 28 New
    +2
    Uncle Vova apparently made a condition - you will bomb under one condition: all those who have been explored by us, into our boiler, and bomb according to our target designations ... A step to the side, a jump on the spot will be regarded as an escape to Isil with the corresponding consequences
  31. Evil Kind
    Evil Kind 18 October 2015 13: 29 New
    +3
    Well, everything is clear here. Since strikes without the permission of the official authorities of Syria (Assad) are not legal under international law, they want to partially legitimize them. Moreover, if China approves, it turns out it will approve of the violation of international law. The Britons are cunning, they want to tie China with myself and partially detach from us. I think the Chinese are not stupid and will answer diplomatically simply: "We support strikes against ISIS ..... subject to international law."
  32. Denis DV
    Denis DV 18 October 2015 13: 35 New
    0
    It can be seen in the plans of the British war with terrorists is not included. What plans is he talking about? Probably not only the Turks sucked free oil.
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 15: 45 New
      0
      Moreover, I think that Europe and the United States calculated, with absolute chaos in Libya, Iraq, and Syria, to suck smuggled oil through the IG on a non-sickly scale of 20 thalers, gaining a competitive advantage over China, which buys oil on the stock exchange at 50 ... Of course, China is the combination categorically does not suit ... And along the way, the Americans calculated to bend Russia by lowering oil prices (in any case, they would buy oil even cheaper (up to 3-5 thalers) through the IG than China) ....
  33. Zheka40
    Zheka40 18 October 2015 13: 36 New
    0
    Dumb, Dumber
  34. marshes
    marshes 18 October 2015 13: 40 New
    0
    It smacks of world conspiracy. laughing
    Britain-China, the Rothschilds, Hong Kong (Hong Kong) -British Economic Law, HSBC-all in a bunch ... laughing
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 15: 47 New
      +1
      The Chinese remember very well that the Rothschilds were the founders of the East India Company, with whose hands the Opium Wars were waged ...
      1. marshes
        marshes 18 October 2015 16: 10 New
        0
        Quote: Karlovar
        The Chinese remember very well that the Rothschilds were the founders of the East India Company, with whose hands the Opium Wars were waged ...

        And what do the Chinese actively collaborate with them?
  35. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 18 October 2015 13: 46 New
    +4
    Cameron, you have no right to bomb any country other than Great Britain.
    And there’s nothing to urge anyone else to do.
    An attack on any other country, bypassing international law, is called aggression.
    Cameron, you are an aggressor, because the Syrian President does not invite you to Syria and you do not have a UN mandate, therefore you are an aggressor.
  36. Belarus
    Belarus 18 October 2015 14: 11 New
    +3
    Interestingly, the UK is trying to enlist the support of China in bombing ISIS positions in Syria which (bombing) are de jure illegal. There is no decision of the UN Security Council and there is no invitation from the legitimate Syria. As they say, the Anglo-Saxons are trying to drive to China on a lame goat.
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 18 October 2015 15: 50 New
      +2
      Anglo-Saxons (Cameron, not even Anglo-Saxon at all, upbringing) arrogantly consider the Chinese dumber than their loved ones))))))
  37. individual
    individual 18 October 2015 14: 27 New
    +3
    Quote:
    "Only friendship can be worse than a war with the Anglo-Saxons."
    This should always be remembered!
  38. 3vs
    3vs 18 October 2015 14: 28 New
    +3
    I hope Xi Jinping will respond to this "comrade" in the spirit of:
    "You should not ask me this, but the lawfully elected President of Syria, Bashar al-Assad."
  39. Dynamic systems
    Dynamic systems 18 October 2015 15: 09 New
    +2
    Looks like the Saudis cried to this prostitute for a kick from Sochi and threatened to take out their gold from London if they did not affect Russia ... the first step through China.
    However, in China they remember well who poisoned the population with opium and what the words from London are equal to.
    You can see the stigma in the gun from the Anglics from "affairs" in Syria ...
  40. Zomanus
    Zomanus 18 October 2015 15: 11 New
    -1
    And this is what interests me.
    And Cameron has nowhere else to bomb?
    There is still Iraq, for example, Libya ...
    Why did all of these go to Syria?
    We cover Syria and nefig climb into our clearing.
    If you want to help, then only under our gaze.
    We’ll cut it, we’ll set goals, then we’ll come and check.
    And according to the results of the work done, we will talk further.
    Otherwise, no way ...
    1. ssn18
      ssn18 18 October 2015 19: 58 New
      -1
      "We'll cut it,"

      Dear Zomanus! Will you personally chop? You personally Bashar al-Assad, or the people of Syria have endowed with the authority vested and control?
  41. propolsky
    propolsky 18 October 2015 15: 17 New
    +3
    What everyone remembered about Syria when Russia began to restore order by sweeping out all the rubbish with a filthy broom. Maybe they want to participate in the sharing of interests in the postwar period?
    1. ssn18
      ssn18 18 October 2015 19: 52 New
      0
      Maybe they want to participate in the sharing of interests in the postwar period?

      And so it has always been and there is nothing to be surprised at. If you read the history and memoirs of the Second World War, you can understand this. Whoever didn’t stand at the Victory Pie, even the distant African countries, which the WWII did not touch any side.
      Jodl, signing the act of unconditional surrender of Germany, pointing to the representatives of small-breeds and amphibian eaters sarcastically asked: "And these are also winners?" I think there was a grain of reason in his words.
  42. atamankko
    atamankko 18 October 2015 15: 24 New
    +3
    Beyond these stinkers there is no one in the world.
  43. sounddoc
    sounddoc 18 October 2015 16: 15 New
    +1
    Quote: Baikonur
    I don’t understand at all: will Cameron ask Beijing to support London’s plan?
    What does Beijing have to do with it?
    Why does London support Beijing in this matter?

    This is the type I would ask some interlocutor to support my plans for the repair of the apartment!
    I would have made it anyway!
    But why do I need his approval ???

    Dear Baikonur, the answer is simple and clear: this is the usual strengthening of rhetoric - with the help of Uncle X, make the last Chinese warning to the enemy! There remains a sheer small amount - to determine the enemy ...
  44. Wolka
    Wolka 18 October 2015 16: 21 New
    +2
    who didn’t have time, he was late, the Britons offered you, you refused, now your time is up, now it’s your business to observe and draw conclusions in advance, and God forbid, do not try to crap ...
  45. Leeder
    Leeder 18 October 2015 17: 17 New
    +1
    But who is it to bomb?
    Until now, the Anti-IGil coalition has failed to identify who is a moderate and who is a less moderate terrorist.
  46. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 18 October 2015 17: 18 New
    +2
    Cameron asks Beijing to support London's plans to bomb ISIS positions in Syria

    According to the principle: yesterday the elephant was beaten and I kicked once.
  47. Turkir
    Turkir 18 October 2015 17: 23 New
    +2
    Apparently someone, I suspect Obama, told Cameron that he, Cameron, is the number one politician in the world.
    Therefore, Cameron holds his finger so as not to forget about it.
    1. ssn18
      ssn18 18 October 2015 19: 39 New
      +1
      "Apparently someone, I suspect Obama, told Cameron that he, Cameron, is the number one politician in the world."

      Inspired. In the native SA, the foremen (warrant officers) had a favorite saying: "They put on you a uniform, they said that you were a soldier, and you believed it?" This is about the same opera.
  48. GDV
    GDV 18 October 2015 17: 28 New
    +1
    Bestiality is a terrible sin.
  49. afrikanez
    afrikanez 18 October 2015 17: 50 New
    +2
    The United States and England are not very different from each other. How the Americans bomb, we all already know. The British, I think, will be even cooler. Not only hospitals will bomb, but also something else that will not be related to ISIS at all.
  50. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 18 October 2015 18: 04 New
    +2
    Strange comrade this Cameron! In Russian speaking, if not a man. Storms him from corner to corner in political decisions. Anything, if only not as it should.