Iranian "kuzkina mother" for America and other enemies of the Islamic revolution

77
Iranian State Television journalists for the first time in stories received permission to visit a secret underground missile base. Moreover, the military allowed the correspondents to capture everything they saw on a video camera and show the plot to the general public, reports Ридус with reference to IRINN channel materials.

Iranian "kuzkina mother" for America and other enemies of the Islamic revolution


“Iranian missiles of various radii are ready to launch from underground bases on the first order of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei”,
said the commander of the IRGC aerospace group, Amir Hajizade, on air.

According to him, Iran "Has not one but many missile bases in all provinces and cities throughout the country, and each of them is located at a depth of 500 meters."

Hajizade noted:
"We have no concerns about new and most advanced generations of satellites belonging to the enemies of the Islamic revolution."


Earlier (in early September), Tehran announced its readiness to launch a missile attack on US bases in the region to protect the Assad government.

In this case, the Iranians do not disclose data on the number of missiles and their characteristics. They only note that they are short-range and medium-range missiles. “We do not feel any need to increase the range of our missiles and our enemy completely within the range of our missiles,” Hajizade said.

77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +50
    17 October 2015 09: 53
    So Iran has Kuzkin’s mother, so stay tuned for Pind’s bazaar ..... sy.
    1. +27
      17 October 2015 10: 02
      Syrian missile system 9K72 "Elbrus, also known as" SCUD-B
    2. +27
      17 October 2015 10: 31
      Quote: A1L9E4K9S
      So Iran has Kuzkin’s mother, so stay tuned for Pind’s bazaar ..... sy.

      I don’t know what kind of Kuz'kina’s mother they are, only the mattresses overseas sit out, it’s not enough to have this Kuz'kina’s mother, it’s still necessary to deliver her to her destination. Besides Israel and the Saudis, I don’t have to see any other goals. here Kuzkina’s mother will prove herself well.
      1. +7
        17 October 2015 11: 19
        Quote: vovanpain
        I don’t know what kind of Kuz'kin’s mother they are, only the mattresses overseas sit out, it’s not enough to have this Kuz'kina’s mother, it’s still necessary to deliver her to her destination.

        To hold the mattresses, it is not at all necessary that the missiles reach them. It is necessary that the missiles reach those places where they can stick their nose.
        1. 0
          17 October 2015 22: 35
          IMHO: Somehow not seriously - they showed the underground STORAGE, which has ENTRIES, known, reconnoitered by satellites during construction.
          Seal these entrances, in case of war - like two fingers on asphalt.

          I would seriously be surprised by individual mine launches for the shown missiles Lying HERE on tractors. Even if these are movable installations, they still need to get out of these caves ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            17 October 2015 23: 26
            Of course, we all understand that although Iran has sufficient military and human potential to support Syria and confront both Turkey and Israel or the Saudi obscurantists with QATARs, Iran’s technological capabilities are still limited

            On the other hand, you just need to transfer certain technologies to a friendly country, and you don’t even need to supply them with something yourself - Iranians learn very quickly and are able, as practice has shown, to repeat almost any technology (including nuclear)

            The threat of supplying Iran with technology or high-tech weapons is also becoming one of the "trump cards" of the Russian Federation in its confrontation with the West
          2. 0
            17 October 2015 23: 54
            Quote: Vladimir Pozlnyakov
            useless navy of nato!



            Navy


            Navy in Russia.
      2. +9
        17 October 2015 11: 34
        When the Yanks get their asses squeezed in the Middle East, an external debt economy will collapse. But in a world brought up and nourished by the Americans, it’s somehow not customary to help the stumbled and impoverished. More likely to stumble, finish off. So they will bask over the ocean at the bonfire of the Yellowstone Reserve.
        1. +5
          18 October 2015 00: 58
          American politics in the Middle East is not changing.
          The classics of Soviet political caricatures are not getting old.

    3. +10
      17 October 2015 10: 36
      Right now 3,14, the Indos and the Geyropeans will start yelling with one voice - "we said that the missile defense system is against Iran, we will expand!" Not during Iran showed its economy ...
      1. +6
        17 October 2015 10: 45
        I hope they have enough mind not to use their missiles.

        Done, showed - right, there is something to defend, but if applied
        - good will not end.

        And if there are real means of delivery - they will be watched in four eyes, so that the real Kuzkin’s mother is not created

      2. +8
        17 October 2015 10: 53
        It doesn’t matter, because it’s clear that the existence of Euro-missile defense in the configuration it is planned for and the non-participation of Russia automatically turns it into a system directed against the Russian Federation .....
      3. +2
        17 October 2015 17: 24
        ..... it seems to me ... by the time .... spoon, for dinner! wink
    4. +8
      17 October 2015 10: 50
      Persians - GOOD FELLOWS, well done - PERSIANS.
    5. +12
      17 October 2015 11: 02
      Quote: A1L9E4K9S
      So Iran has Kuzkin’s mother

      In fact, Kuzkina’s mother is a means of destruction (SBP), not a means of delivery, which we were shown in the video. Whether or not Persians have UXOs is a question that plagues the Yankees. But the fact that medium-range delivery vehicles are available is a fact. And this makes Iran a serious player on the BV map, which does not pass migraine for the chosen ones.
      And the statement that the Amer’s bases are now under the gun of Iranian missiles is seriously annoying the Yankees. This will force them to deploy additional Patriot divisions. And these are serious overhead expenses that you cannot shift to NATO. They will have to bear the Pentagon, however.
    6. -22
      17 October 2015 12: 49
      A1L9E4K9S (2) Today, 09:53 AM New
      So Iran has Kuzkin’s mother, so stay tuned for Pind’s bazaar ..... sy.



      It would be extremely naive to hope that Iranian Islamofascists confine themselves to Israel or America and do not turn their nuclear teeth to Russia later. This is the same as their German cousins: they began with the Jews, and continued with Russia. Therefore, it is not only Jewish, but also Russian interest, so that Iran would have neither nuclear weapons, nor delivery vehicles ...
      1. Don
        +5
        17 October 2015 14: 42
        Quote: beitar
        Islamofascists

        laughing What are you? And where did you get the idea that they are fascists?
        Quote: beitar
        nuclear teeth later to Russia

        Firstly, they do not have nuclear weapons. Secondly, why do they want to shoot at a friend in the Russian Federation? Iran has equal relations with the Russian Federation. Do you have paranoia? Persians can’t just sleep and eat and just think about how to launch nuclear weapons for someone. They need OTRK and TRK, given that the Air Force is not numerous and mostly outdated, for the ability to respond across enemy territory, Israel, Saudi Arabia and US bases.
      2. +10
        17 October 2015 16: 41
        Quote: beitar
        It would be extremely naive to hope that Iranian Islamic fascists
        Islamic fascists, in the long run, and ukrofashists in reality!
      3. +3
        17 October 2015 20: 03
        Iran itself is counted, the main thing for Iran is not to touch it. This country does not enter into alliances with anyone. Threats to Israel are bullshit. If Iran is not touched, then it will not touch.
  2. +5
    17 October 2015 09: 54
    And who I think is Iran’s opponent!
    1. +7
      17 October 2015 10: 51
      It doesn’t matter who their adversary is, but personally, the presence of nuclear weapons in another state near us is somehow not happy (to say the least)! hi
  3. +5
    17 October 2015 09: 56
    Good to have allies.
    1. +7
      17 October 2015 10: 05
      Yes! Russia!
      1. +1
        17 October 2015 10: 57
        Good to have allies.

        I agree! This is what our Emperor used to say. It’s not for nothing that they called him a peacemaker !:
        “In the whole world we have only two faithful allies - our army and navy. Everyone else, at the earliest opportunity, will gang themselves up against us. ”
        Emperor Alexander 3 Peacemaker.
  4. +2
    17 October 2015 09: 57
    In response to the lifting of sanctions by America))))
  5. +12
    17 October 2015 09: 58
    Zvezdanuto-striped were going to forever enforce their rules around the world! Get arguments from dissenting! How miserable against this background look old and new Americanozhopalizy.
    1. +2
      17 October 2015 10: 40
      Quote: Nymp
      Get arguments from dissenting!

      nda, the fact that the Iranian propaganda workshop plows in two shifts, apparently, gives results.
      What are some arguments? What is everyone excited about?
      Quote: Nymp
      How miserable against this background look old and new Americanozhopalizy.

      Well, that's why they are "... lisa" to count on the master's protection in case of something. This is where everything is logical - protection in exchange for loyalty. One might think that the USSR had other methods in relation to the adepts.
      1. +3
        17 October 2015 11: 58
        Oh, the difference is colossal! The USSR, taking obligations, defended. And the Anglo-Saxons, only depending on whether it is profitable or not. They never even hid that they had no allies, but only interests. Interestingly, there are still clients who are looking for patronage and alliance. The Poles are especially distinguished: I wonder how many times the Anglo-Saxons should throw them so that they would abandon their addiction to everything Anglo-Saxon? But now, a fact, they did not begin to distance themselves from them, but rather, to seek alternative harbors. I wonder who will be the next, completely new superpower?
        1. +2
          17 October 2015 12: 21
          Quote: Azitral
          I wonder how many times the Anglo-Saxons should throw them

          if you mean the eve and the beginning of WWII, then the Poles deserve it - the desire of a pshekosluhi to be friends with the powerful in order to achieve their panpolonistic orgasm "from May to May" quite expectedly ended with an enema with "pieces" and disappearance from the map of Europe.
          Quote: Azitral
          look for alternative harbors.

          Duc Fokkevulfich (Zhirinovsky which) has already found a harbor for them and the Finns, no? laughing
      2. +2
        17 October 2015 12: 36
        Quote: Das Boot
        nda, the fact that the Iranian propaganda workshop plows in two shifts, apparently, gives results. What are some arguments? What is everyone excited about?

        You see, the mattresses for too long, were engaged in beating up "babies" - that is, countries that are not able to offer decent resistance, but here, with the emergence of even a theoretical threat to suffer serious losses, and, importantly, to be drawn into another long-term and expensive military adventure in the absence confidence in victory, has a sobering effect on mattresses, which requires a rethinking of all logistics, tactics and strategy.
        Even if it’s inflatable, or cardboard rockets))))) but at a certain stage this is still an argument.
      3. +4
        17 October 2015 18: 20
        Quote: Das Boot
        This is where everything is logical - protection in exchange for loyalty. One might think that the USSR had other methods with regard to adherents.

        Well, let’s be more specific, since we’re not clear. Take dill. These independent ones had a great opportunity not to become, as you say, adepts of America. With the collapse of the Union, they got both nuclear potential and a huge tank fleet, a completely combat-ready fleet, the Air Force, Ukraine as a whole could communicate on equal terms with the powers that be, mediocre politics, and servile worship in the West, turned them (again in your words) in adherents.
        Quote: Das Boot
        You might think that the USSR had other methods

        And where does the USSR? I didn't mention it. We are talking about Russia. But by the way, the USSR had all the same other methods. To all the so-called adepts, the USSR set up cities, factories and factories. I still remember the time when we worked for free for the benefit of various socially oriented countries. America did not do this with its "adepts."
  6. +7
    17 October 2015 10: 00
    Good is good! Nothing good!
    We'll have to cover another missile-dangerous direction. Friends today, tomorrow?
    1. +7
      17 October 2015 11: 19
      Quote: armored optimist
      We'll have to cover another missile-dangerous direction.
      It is necessary to take into account, "and if ..." And so this direction is covered by the early warning system and missile defense / air defense systems.
      Quote: armored optimist
      Friends today, tomorrow?
      So for this Lavrov, together with the GDP and plow, so that we have more friends, and the Yankes - fewer. "Foreign policy" is called, however!
  7. +2
    17 October 2015 10: 00
    IRANIAN GOOD FELLOWS! They created everything under sanctions, we have something to learn.
    1. -4
      17 October 2015 10: 03
      To which we joined, a little cowardly, in my opinion ...
    2. +18
      17 October 2015 10: 32
      And the Soviet Union for 70 years, according to you, it wasn’t possible under the Sanktsy’s, mattress mattresses even refused to trade. And you are Iran, Iran. Either the Soviet Union did well, you mastered space, the country was restored after the war. And the Americans in their entire history had one civilian territory south with the north.
  8. +3
    17 October 2015 10: 00
    “We do not feel any need to increase the range of our missiles and our enemy is completely within the scope of our missiles,” Hajizade said.

    that is, the doctrine is this - not to increase the range of their missiles, but to drag the enemy into the radius of existing ones?

    many missile bases in all provinces and cities across the country, and each of them is located at a depth of 500 meters

    why so deep? Are they going to fight or hide? And what, interestingly, are the standards for deployment from a depth of half a kilometer?

    Although, the Iranian propaganda has always pleased.
    1. +2
      17 October 2015 11: 39
      500 meters is serious. No bomb will take it, not even a thermonuclear one. It is not clear only how they are going to start up from such a depth. "Ready to launch from underground bases"- so it is written.

      In principle, while Khamenei believes that the striped are enemies and terrorists, this is good. What next?
  9. +10
    17 October 2015 10: 01
    What is this "missile base"? Most likely a "rocket garage". And the technique, judging by the picture, is the good old "SCUD". Hopefully, the Iranian TV crew were not shown the most interesting.
    1. +2
      17 October 2015 10: 07
      Quote: TRex
      Most likely a "rocket garage".

      laughing very accurate definition.
  10. 0
    17 October 2015 10: 01
    Well done Iranians. With the Yankees, that's just the way it is. Provoke - rake. And let them think if they really need it.
    1. 0
      17 October 2015 10: 05
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      With the Yankees, that's just the way it is.

      yeah. From a depth of 500 meters replicas of old Soviet missiles. I think America is trembling.
      1. +4
        17 October 2015 11: 26
        Quote: Das Boot
        I think America is trembling.

        No, America, as always, is CAREFUL!
        Their allies tremble: Israel, KSA, Qatar.
        By the way, as for Israel, I doubt very much: with their well-publicized missile defense and not knocking down a log of SCAD - it’s nonsense! In addition, they are clearly not going to wait for the gift to fly to them themselves.
        As they say, * small bug, but smelly! *
        1. 0
          17 October 2015 11: 45
          These have four more. Covers Moscow, St. Petersburg and Berlin. Can carry 3 BB MIRVs. Arabia has "sun-wyn" old Chinese at 2300km. And it is de facto sponsoring the Pakistani nuclear program, so we can assume that they also have yadryonbaton.
          The responsibility of Israel and Arabia is close to zero, and Pakistan is about to slide into the Taliban. The likelihood of the use of the KSA and Israel by Pestan for a nuclear provocation against the Russian Federation. And Russia will have to clean up this garbage too. Our "potential partners" riveted macaques with a nuclear grenade and delivery vehicles in the Middle East in the Middle East.
        2. +2
          17 October 2015 13: 04
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          Their allies tremble: Israel, KSA, Qatar.

          well, there’s why - the Persians try on the role of a regional leader no less. The fact that not everyone likes it is quite obvious. With the difference that the ceiling of the CA and Qatar are terrorist creatures, but Israel is another matter.
  11. +4
    17 October 2015 10: 03
    Cheeks are pouting ... Our self-sufficient. For what I love Persians - they know how to compose such tales. With oriental flavor. Recently, Iran has been heard around the world. But he doesn’t have nuclear weapons. Aviation, too. Someone saw the missiles he brags about. The tests are classified.
  12. +3
    17 October 2015 10: 03
    An interesting concept, we should also think about this for yars)
    1. +2
      17 October 2015 10: 07
      For Yars there is a mine base - that's enough.
    2. +5
      17 October 2015 10: 08
      I thought the same thing. Can not nuclear trains build a nuclear subway? belay
      1. +3
        17 October 2015 11: 35
        Quote: dr.star75
        Can not nuclear trains build a nuclear subway?
        the Americans were already trying to do this with their MX ... Zae ... they had to dig tunnels! Besides, the rocket didn’t want to fly normally after the shake The idea was buried.
        The Hunfuzes dug it up (literally and figuratively), now their DF-31s are rolling through underground tunnels ... Why, they will become: 1,5 billion people. with shovels - "Well, can they replace excavators !?" belay
  13. +3
    17 October 2015 10: 06
    Mother of Kuzma - that's for sure! The roots are still probably Soviet.
  14. +10
    17 October 2015 10: 06
    Stupidity, of course, bloodthirsty I’ll say: but - maybe someone already smells? Eun still has something .....

    Yes, - her - certainly stupidity. People everywhere - people!

    But this country, well-known to all, is already a bit of a podz .... tired of it. They need to change something in their foreign policy. How many wars are unleashed thanks to a country 300 years old?
    1. -12
      17 October 2015 10: 15
      Quote: DEZINTO
      but - maybe someone already smells?

      Where? well, in the name of Allah or Juche, a couple of these metal structures will be thrown towards the nearest Americans, so what? And tomorrow yourself
      1. +10
        17 October 2015 10: 21
        Yes, I’m saying - stupidity of course! Just sickened up! And I do not call for any radioactive ashes.

        I don't like the fact that American tanks are forty kilometers away from me - there were none! Five years ago - there were none - and now there are tanks and "Patriots". Not comfortable - at least.

        What the hell is this? - sailed across the ocean, parked, and aimed sights! - What is a normal relationship? Bullshit is complete and not a relationship. So I don’t mind if anyone takes aim at them!
        1. -11
          17 October 2015 10: 51
          Quote: DEZINTO
          What the hell is this? - sailed across the ocean, parked, and aimed sights!

          Well, what can the Persians do? The Juchhoid even has some nuclear weapons, however, the number of charges varies from 8 to 50 - but nonetheless. And more booners. America FSUs, they won't get it, and Kimushka is quite capable of arranging the regional glove compartment. How can these scare the Americans? "Get out of the bay!"? How many blanks will they have time to throw at the AUG before they are methodically shredded into canned cat food?
  15. +3
    17 October 2015 10: 25
    Let's hope that Israel will soon realize that security is not measured in $ and without the United States, peace in the region can come very quickly.
    1. -5
      17 October 2015 11: 59
      Quote: Vita VKO
      security is not measured in $

      Israel is already aware that security is measured in megatons.
      Quote: Vita VKO
      Without the United States, peace in the region can come very quickly.

      is it in Israel specifically? Or on all BV? You have an interesting recipe for peace. But I'm afraid it won’t work.
    2. +6
      17 October 2015 12: 19
      Quote: Vita VKO
      Let's hope that Israel will soon realize that

      very soon a game called "King of the Hill BV" will begin.
      In this regard, a couple of thoughts out loud.
      I was humanly touched by the speech of B. Natanyahu at the anniversary session of the UN General Assembly. When he asked the question: why does the UN not respond to a direct, open call from the "Islamists" to destroy his state, the Jewish people?
      And you know what the reaction of the delegates is?
      BADDING FULL SILENCE OF THE UN GA MEETING HALL !!!
      I’m not a Jew, and like any Orthodox, somewhere deep down in my heart I don’t like them (and I must honestly say there is something!), But, as the GDP said, let's live peacefully and not do lawlessness at will, do not interfere with others to live as they see fit: according to their traditions and laws.
      And in this regard, I understand our President, his benevolent attitude towards the Jewish state.
      If the state of Israel does not become a BV ... then the radical Islamists will do such lawlessness and terror that the possessed Aloizovich will seem like a boy in short pants from the sandbox of the Third Reich!
      Therefore, it seems to me, Israel should be supported, where "a quarter of our former people", because today in the BV it is the only representative of Christian civilization - a counterbalance to another, young, radical Islamic civilization. It is its representatives * on camera * that cut the heads of Christians, eat the hearts of killed Syrian soldiers ... blow up cars with explosives in cities.
      The system of support and counterbalances MUST WORK FOR PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST!
      Syria, while B. Assad is there, we support even by armed means. But - peace will come, Assad will suddenly die, fall ill, lose the election (God forbid, of course!), * Moderate * Yankees fosterlings can come to power in the country ... And if * they roll over * onto the path of the ghazavat, intifada or whatever crap ... And then what? On whom will we rely, where is the alternate aerodrome?
      1. +1
        17 October 2015 22: 09
        > THE OWNING THUNDEROUS SILENCE OF THE UN General Assembly Hall !!!

        maybe this ancient interview will help to understand the reason for such an attitude, which is not a special secret for anyone. Many people consider this author a Jew, and his logic is considered typical.

        Although of course, the state and people must be protected, people rarely directly participate in the games of the top and rarely fully involved in their affairs

        "These are impossible Armenians."
        Revelations of the English spy and the scoundrel Lawrence of Arabia.

        http://dobriy-eekh.livejournal.com/1268678.html

        PS. Learn neither mine, it’s just the first link that came to hand in an article that was repeatedly reprinted in our press - so that we would be familiar with the revelations from the first, ts hands.
      2. +1
        18 October 2015 06: 28
        I don’t know, talked with the Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese - normal people ...
  16. +4
    17 October 2015 10: 26
    Probably for Americans it sounds exactly the same as for us, when Felicia Pshekia is yapping from behind the owner’s back. We are naturally not the masters of Iran, but good neighbors with a very powerful back
    1. 0
      18 October 2015 06: 31
      Przekia is nearby, Iran is half the globe. Is there a difference?
  17. +2
    17 October 2015 10: 26
    The morale of the Iranian army is high, this is the main thing. The people cannot be defeated. And the fact that the armament is slightly behind the advanced technologies is fixable.
    1. +1
      17 October 2015 11: 16
      Quote: Alexander 3
      .People cannot be defeated

      such a task is not posed. This is not an Ost master plan for you. It is enough to chop them into anarchy, and they will gnaw themselves. With a little outside help from professional democratizers, of course. For examples not far.
      1. 0
        17 October 2015 11: 39
        And what have they still not tried to plunge into anarchy? If not for today's Iran, Russia would have long been forced to fight along the entire perimeter of the Persian Gulf.
        1. +2
          17 October 2015 12: 05
          Quote: Otshelnik
          And what still did not try to plunge into anarchy?

          wrote the same:
          Quote: Das Boot
          For examples not far

          The USA launches irreversible mechanisms. This is forcing the BV to war. And indirectly - all interested parties, such as us, China and Europe. This mess in BV has already begun to be called "small world". But usually small things develop exponentially.
  18. +2
    17 October 2015 10: 30
    The USA didn’t take anything at all ...
    Neither in imposing their democracy, nor in conflicts, nor in promoting their hegemony.
    The once inflated balloon is blown away, albeit slowly :)
    1. +3
      17 October 2015 10: 38
      Unseen please, let everything go as it should good
    2. 0
      17 October 2015 10: 55
      The USA didn’t take anything at all ...
      Neither in imposing their democracy, nor in conflicts, nor in promoting their hegemony.

      Toli the world has become strong (I do not believe it), either America has weakened (which is unlikely), or the world has received a worthy leader since the time of Alexander the Liberator
  19. +1
    17 October 2015 10: 50
    Persia was "always". Are they afraid of such a young state as the United States? There were ups and downs, dynasties and the name of the state changed, but through the centuries the Persians carried their culture. Will the North American state be able to boast of this over a long period of time?
  20. +2
    17 October 2015 10: 57
    All the same, I agree with Americans about the fact that an increase in countries possessing nuclear weapons will not lead to anything good, especially if they fall into the hands of Islamic states.
    1. +2
      17 October 2015 11: 48
      And what states do you think are Islamic? Many of these states have one name "Islamic" but in fact they have nothing left of Islam. For example, Saudi, Turkey, Qatar, Kuwait, Emirates, Brunei, Egypt ... etc. ...
      ps ... By the way, in Iran a fatwa has long been issued on which possession of nuclear weapons is not permitted.
  21. +3
    17 October 2015 11: 12
    “Iranian missiles of various radii are ready to launch from underground bases on the first order of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei”,
    And what, do these underground bases have silos? Or do you still need to roll out the BMD to the starting position in the open?
    Therefore, I would not boast that
    "We have no concerns about new and most advanced generations of satellites belonging to the enemies of the Islamic revolution."

    but I would remember that the Predators could spend hours bartering over the alleged RBD in readiness to launch VP missiles. Now is the time to take care of reliable missile defense. Russia can help! For inexpensive.
  22. +1
    17 October 2015 11: 17
    Quote: vovanpain
    I don’t know what kind of Kuz'kin’s mother they are, only the mattresses overseas sit out, it’s not enough to have this Kuz'kina’s mother, it’s still necessary to deliver her to her destination.

    So Iran clearly stated:
    “We do not feel any need to increase the range of our missiles and our enemy is completely within the scope of our missiles”

    And who is within, I think that there is no need to explain.
  23. +1
    17 October 2015 11: 25
    Kuzkin’s mother is afraid of everyone. Iranians like Koreans if they launch a rocket, they don’t know where it will fall.
  24. +1
    17 October 2015 11: 27
    During! Well done Persians !!!!
  25. +1
    17 October 2015 11: 33
    Iranian "kuzkina mother" for America and other enemies of the Islamic revolution

    And now it would be nice to knock on the shoe.
  26. +1
    17 October 2015 11: 45
    So the Persians announced themselves. The country is not easy. With ambition.
  27. 0
    17 October 2015 11: 59
    Quote: Fox_1959
    . But in a world brought up and nourished by the Americans, it’s somehow not customary to help the stumbled and impoverished. More likely to stumble, finish off.

    this is called the law of the chicken coop, go to the bottom, bite \ shove the neighbor. and roosters have no other laws.
  28. 0
    17 October 2015 12: 03
    Quote: vovanpain
    I don’t know what kind of Kuz'kin’s mother they are, only the mattresses overseas sit out, it’s not enough to have this Kuz'kin’s mother, it’s still necessary to deliver her


    But Iran does not strive for delivery to Pindo .... the mainland, it is enough that in the Indian Ocean, star-striped will not feel very comfortable.
    1. 0
      17 October 2015 13: 12
      Quote: A1L9E4K9S
      it’s enough that in the Indian Ocean, star-stripes will not feel very comfortable.

      taking into account the craving of Americans for asymmetric answers, not only they will have to forget about comfort.
  29. 0
    17 October 2015 13: 43
    They didn't show it before, because there was nothing to show. And now it is far from "camilfo". One accurate strike (bomb or missile) before the exits (exits) is enough for this base to remain underground for a long time (if not forever).
  30. 0
    17 October 2015 14: 23
    It's time to demonstrate "Iranian" missiles to ISIS ...
  31. 0
    17 October 2015 14: 56
    This will cool the heads of the SGA and the predatory despotism of the Persian Gulf. Yes
  32. 0
    17 October 2015 18: 06
    According to him, Iran "has not one, but many missile bases in all provinces and cities throughout the country, and each of them is located at a depth of 500 meters."

    Storytellers! 1001 nights! Always loved to tell tales. So it is now. A lot of bases in all provinces and cities ... Will there be enough launchers for all provinces and cities?

    Quote: dropout
    Iranian "Kuz'kina Mother" for America and other enemies of the Islamic RevolutionAnd now it would not hurt to knock a shoe.

    The difference is that in the USSR it was, and Khrushchev knocking shoes had an arsenal behind his back. But the Persians - knock no knock, except for a shoe behind his back has nothing

    Quote: BoA KAA
    And what, do these underground bases have silos? Or do you still need to roll out the ballistic missile defense to the starting position in the open air? Therefore, I would not boast that

    As far as I remember, they had one or two experimental silos. But as a result of the explosion in it, the "product" was destroyed (time - about 2012)
    And so yes, only "rolling out" to the launch site in the open air, plus time for all the necessary procedures ...

    Quote: Das Boot
    such a task is not posed. This is not an Ost master plan for you. It is enough to chop them into anarchy, and they will gnaw themselves. With a little outside help from professional democratizers, of course. For examples not far.

    Quite right. And the next example is Iraq. There was a strong leader - he kept everything in his fist. was gone - confusion and vacillation. A bunch of "fronts", "parties", etc.

    Quote: Das Boot
    Well, what can the Persians do? The Juchhoid even has some nuclear weapons, however, the number of charges varies from 8 to 50 - but nonetheless. And more booners. America FSUs, they won't get it, and Kimushka is quite capable of arranging the regional glove compartment. How can these scare the Americans? "Get out of the bay!"? How many blanks will they have time to throw at the AUG before they are methodically shredded into canned cat food?

    You are an optimist. Basically, the number of charges is estimated at area 20-25, and no one knows if they are transportable or not
    Y; Iran, in principle, has no instrument capable of "destroying" the Americans in the Gulf. A certain number of anti-ship ballistic missiles "Persian Gulf" with a range of 300 km does not count. Only suicide boats, and mini-submarines, which, in principle, are also suicide bombers. During normal service, they are destroyed ahead of time and far from the AUG

    Quote: Das Boot
    Where? well, in the name of Allah or Juche, a couple of these metal structures will be thrown towards the nearest Americans, so what? And tomorrow yourself

    That's for sure. They will be quickly bombed into the Stone Age ...
  33. 0
    17 October 2015 18: 06
    Quote: BoA KAA
    the Americans have already tried to do this with their MX ... Zae .. let's dig tunnels! Besides, the rocket did not want to fly normally after the shake-up. The idea was buried, the Hunfuz dug it up (literally and figuratively), now their DF-31s are rolling through underground tunnels ... And what, they will become: 1,5 billion people. with shovels - "Well, can they replace excavators !?"

    By the way, the idea was not bad, but difficult to implement, because the tunnel arch had to be broken by a transport container

    Quote: armored optimist
    Good is good! Nothing good! We’ll have to cover one more missile-dangerous direction. Friends today, tomorrow?

    That's right. Believe 100% that an Islamic state that has always sought to dominate the region will play a subordinate role - silly and short-sighted. Already, their missiles cover most of the European part of Russia ...

    Quote: rfv0304
    They didn't show it before, because there was nothing to show. And now it is far from "camilfo". One accurate strike (bomb or missile) before the exits (exits) is enough for this base to remain underground for a long time (if not forever).

    Now, too, there are not very many missile systems capable of hitting targets in Europe. For the most part - maximum Greece. Well, there is some that can hit up to and including Germany, but there are very few

    Quote: Otshelnik
    By the way, in Iran, a fatwa has long been issued on which possession of nuclear weapons is not permitted.

    Yeah, and that's why they worked so intensively to create this weapon. Therefore, in the "6 + 1" negotiations, the amount of uranium enriched to 20% was reduced from the amount from which in the future it was possible to obtain up to 20 charges, up to the amount of which a maximum of 1 charge could be made
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. 0
    17 October 2015 20: 05
    Quote: BoA KAA

    Therefore, it seems to me, Israel should be supported, where "a quarter of our former people", because today in the BV it is the only representative of Christian civilization - a counterbalance to another, young, radical Islamic civilization.


    Do not offend Jews and Christians. Don't confuse Christianity and Judaism. Yes, and Muslims, too, hurt: where did you see the "radical Islamic civilization"?
  36. +1
    17 October 2015 20: 27
    Yes, well done now everyone needs to get together and destroy the amers and their friends European fag
    1. 0
      17 October 2015 22: 28
      Quote: Fearless
      Yes, well done now everyone needs to get together and destroy the amers and their friends European fag

      Are you by any chance their spy? laughing
  37. 0
    17 October 2015 20: 45
    Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
    This will cool the heads of the SGA and the predatory despotism of the Persian Gulf.

    Yes, nothing will cool anyone. KSA and IRI have always been enemies. And they will stay. And if Iran start something against KSA and others, I’m afraid that either they themselves or with the help of others will block the Strait of Hormuz. And then what will Iran do? Where to sell oil?
  38. -1
    17 October 2015 22: 34
    Saddam also drove millions in army to parades and showed rockets, in 2 weeks they erased them in dust and had already forgotten, a rag obamych would leave and the line would reach the Persians.
  39. 0
    17 October 2015 22: 47
    All these complexes are reminiscent of Russian design, therefore, someone made an effort to their appearance. It is better to fight with enemies with enemies, and to support the allies themselves.
  40. 0
    18 October 2015 09: 56
    Quote: tatarin_ru
    All these complexes are reminiscent of Russian design, therefore, someone made an effort to their appearance. It is better to fight with enemies with enemies, and to support the allies themselves.

    And what should they remind if the ancestor was the famous "SCUD", on the basis of which first the North Koreans made their complexes, and then the Iranians made their own. Their know-how is only these launchers, which is in the photo
  41. 0
    18 October 2015 12: 03
    It would be extremely naive to hope that Iranian Islamofascists confine themselves to Israel or America and do not turn their nuclear teeth to Russia later. This is the same as their German cousins: they began with the Jews, and continued with Russia. Therefore, this is not only Jewish, but also of Russian interest, so that Iran would have neither nuclear weapons, nor delivery vehicles ... [/ quote]
    And since when have Islamic fanatics become friends of Russia? Today is Shaitan America, tomorrow is Russia.