Military Review

Swiss writer - Nobel laureate-2015: "Madame Aleksievich, you are not just lying ..."

224
Swiss writer Helen Richard-Favre (Hélène Richard-Favre), author of the books “Nouvelles de nulle part”, “Nouvelles de rien” and “Nouvelles de Personne” addressed an open letter to Svetlana Aleksievich, Nobel Prize winner-2015 in literature.
Recall that the Belarusian writer Svetlana Alexievich at a press conference in Minsk after she received the Nobel Prize stated that the war in Donbass, which killed more than 8 thousand people, was the result of foreign intervention.


“This is an occupation, this is a foreign invasion,” said Aleksiyevich.

Also, a Belarusian writer said that in Russia “86% of people became happy” to kill people in Donetsk.

We give the text of the open letter Helene Richard-Favre, which she wrote Alexievich.

“Madam Aleksievich,

in the Donbas, which you mentioned during your press conference, a woman named Lilia, 24's, broke off her leg when, following her maternal instinct, she covered her 11-month-old son with her body. They were both on the bus, which was under fire.

This, like many other similar cases of murder and destruction in the Donbas, is the result of government action, which is supported by the West.

I urge you to read this article by a French journalist who is in Donetsk: http://dnipress.com/fr/posts/lilia-24-ans-une-jambe-arrachee-elle-sauve-son-petit-garcon/

What happened to Lilia is far from an isolated incident, and I hope you understand this. (Lily was treated in Moscow, - Ed.)

We all have to choose the topics about which we write. You made your choice and found your audience that admires them.

But you, the one that made the basis of your creativity the fight against lies, how can you claim that 86% of Russians rejoice in the deaths of people in the Donbas?

Madame, by stating this, you are not just lying, you are not just mistaken, you have disdained reality.

Sincerely, Helen RISHAR-FAVR "
Author:
Originator:
http://baltnews.ee/mir/20151012/1014162478.html
224 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. dr.Bo
      dr.Bo 15 October 2015 15: 33 New
      132
      "... Madame, stating this, you are not just lying, you are not just mistaken, you despised reality.

      Sincerely, Helen RISHAR-FAVR ""
      Well done, strong words !!!! hi
      1. Estet59
        Estet59 15 October 2015 15: 43 New
        90
        But with respect, she is in vain!
        1. Lukich
          Lukich 15 October 2015 16: 21 New
          66
          Quote: Estet59
          But with respect, she is in vain!

          but it's probably just the innate politeness of a cultured person
          1. Ramzaj99
            Ramzaj99 15 October 2015 17: 41 New
            57
            Where the world is heading ..... If already the Nobel Prizes are given not to those who are worthy, but to those who are nicer to lick ....
            After such things, you begin to lose faith in humanity in general, and in the fact that justice will ever triumph on this fucking planet .....
            Ugh((((...
            1. OlegLex
              OlegLex 15 October 2015 17: 51 New
              54
              We are Russian and differ from the cursed Anglo-Saxons in that, unlike them, we have a very developed sense of justice, so why are you surprised? !! The Nobel Prize has long become a political tool, doesn’t you have anything to say about the Obama Peace Prize in the 2008 year, they just elected him a preserve ... (oops) as president, he was already declared a peacemaker and awarded, or the previous literature prize was handed to a Chinese writer a dissident, not for writing better than the classics, but for being a dissident.
              So something like this. and about justice, so if it will triumph, it is only here in Russia. because only Russians are capable of dying not only for the idea but also for justice.
              1. Will
                Will 16 October 2015 02: 04 New
                10
                Justice is what many want, but do not want it even more, because it is it that prevents the parasite from living calmly having a human body. Justice itself is a great force, but when it is “covered” from head to toe with a lie, it begins to seem to many that it should be so. How can one explain to many of them that they, by their actions, make the world worse than what could really be, if there weren’t many imaginary hopes that there would be “kings,” that is, maybe there are many who live not according to work, but according to "position"? Why are there so many who want to play the lottery, with conviction - I will win?
              2. sin_v
                sin_v 16 October 2015 10: 52 New
                13
                Forgot to mention also Alexander Isaevich. "The Gulag Archipelago" - is that - literature?
            2. Temples
              Temples 15 October 2015 18: 33 New
              23
              These prizes are given to those who are worthy in the opinion of the committee.
              So, that is not surprising.
              This is a naughty policy! There really wasn’t there.
              The Nobel Committee, elected by the Norwegian Parliament!
              Either the committee is served before the winner (US president, the European Union, etc.), or the winner is served.
              Occasionally they will give it to someone from another "camp", but this is more for their own status as a committee.
              A cuckoo praises a rooster for praising a cuckoo!
              Nothing new)))
            3. Dart2027
              Dart2027 15 October 2015 20: 00 New
              +2
              And this is a well-known practice.
            4. Sterlya
              Sterlya 15 October 2015 22: 16 New
              11
              The Nobel Prize is just another western bullshit, like all western ones.
              Justice there never smelled.
              Can you imagine the arrogant and justice at the same time? and the Norwegians have been lying under them for a very long time
            5. 34 region
              34 region 15 October 2015 22: 50 New
              +8
              Nobel give those who are worthy? It already seems to me that they give her out for loyalty to certain circles, views, and guidelines. And this orientation is England, USA.
            6. dvg79
              dvg79 16 October 2015 03: 26 New
              +1
              And they were always given just that, with rare exceptions like Sholokhov.
            7. Rarahin
              Rarahin 16 October 2015 07: 01 New
              +4
              "Nobel" was politicized almost from its very existence.
              And the "Nobel" in literature has always been Russophobic.

              Regarding this Aleksievich: I began to search in the internet for reviews of her books. More than 20 pages of responses to the request - only laudatory reviews and admired criticism.
              How can this be? Even at the request of criticism for the works of recognized masters of the pen, even then up to 20-30 percent of the references are criticized negative, even negative.

              But, apparently, for the sake of the desired laureate, you can try and clean.
            8. Aposlya
              Aposlya 16 October 2015 17: 08 New
              +1
              This whole Nobel Prize is just a PR of the “necessary” people and ideas!
            9. Fight cat
              Fight cat 16 October 2015 18: 37 New
              +1
              who told you what was wrong? At one time, Musolini was given the Nobel Prize and even Hitler was a laureate, Obama and Gorbachev received, well, just very worthy people !!!
            10. Mwg
              Mwg 16 October 2015 19: 18 New
              0
              Gorbachev, for example, was given the Nobel Prize ...
            11. DarthVedro
              DarthVedro 16 October 2015 19: 53 New
              +2
              Duc Milton Friedman was also given the Nobel Prize in economics, but Pinochet, who followed his theories in the economic field, to put it mildly, failed, like most shock therapy countries. I do not think that the issuance of such prizes is apolitical
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. unic52
            unic52 15 October 2015 18: 39 New
            +7
            this is the standard style of writing letters (ethics of correspondence), but the essence is translated very well! Aleksievich - shaking hands Madame! I do not believe her writings, she is simply disgusting in her subjectivity!
          4. The comment was deleted.
            1. win
              win 15 October 2015 20: 30 New
              +8
              Only now vague doubts torment me about the commitment of our "partners" to the old school

              Sometimes diplomatic language infuriates me too.
              Once said GDP about "soaking in the toilet", so much screaming and howling was. Unbalanced ...
              We must often tell them like that in the face of the face ...
        2. Homo
          Homo 15 October 2015 17: 10 New
          +3
          Quote: Estet59
          But with respect, she is in vain!

          This is just politeness, nothing personal.
        3. Rashid
          Rashid 15 October 2015 18: 39 New
          17
          At the entrance, they hung a note: "When will you stop drilling day and night? And so on .. So that you die! Respectfully, neighbors.
        4. SIMM
          SIMM 15 October 2015 18: 50 New
          +4
          It’s just that someone remains a man, and a whore always remains her, albeit changing the status to “political”
        5. DEfindER
          DEfindER 16 October 2015 19: 58 New
          +1
          And what’s wrong, all rightly said, the victims were as a result of a foreign invasion by the Nazi junta on the territory of the DPR LPR.
      2. kartalovkolya
        kartalovkolya 15 October 2015 15: 47 New
        32
        "There are WOMEN in the Swiss villages ..." (in contrast to this scum who danced on the bones of those killed in the Donbass)! "Respect and complete respect" Madame RICHARD-FAVR! So her, so well, just a mug in the fact that she shit, and also hails from Belarus!
        1. Rurikovich
          Rurikovich 15 October 2015 18: 23 New
          12
          Quote: kartalovkolya
          So her, so well, just a mug in the fact that she shit, and also hails from Belarus!

          She is Ukrainian, she just lives here ... She has citizenship ... recourse
          And it’s kind of like from Ivano-Frankivsk. Genes ... request
      3. Vyacheslav 64
        Vyacheslav 64 15 October 2015 15: 50 New
        58
        Look deeper colleagues, the Nobel Prize Institute over the past decade has completely declined itself. Look at WHOM and FOR WHAT it has been awarded in recent years ... This is especially true for peace awards, literary awards and awards for achievements in the field of economics. A decent person today is ashamed to receive it.
        1. Lukich
          Lukich 15 October 2015 16: 21 New
          +6
          Quote: Vyacheslav 64
          Look deeper colleagues, the Nobel Prize Institute over the past decade has completely declined itself. Look at WHO and WHAT it has been awarded for in recent years ... This is especially true for peace awards

          just one abamka example
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. win
            win 15 October 2015 20: 35 New
            +3
            just one abamka example

            Somehow disrespectful to the Nobel laureate.
            Could be more polished - lamb.
            1. Flexsus
              Flexsus 15 October 2015 22: 29 New
              0
              and who is he in the party? foal or baby elephant?
        2. Asadullah
          Asadullah 15 October 2015 18: 26 New
          +9
          This is especially true for peace awards, literary awards and awards for achievements in the field of economics.


          And in physics, chemistry, medicine the same thing. But here it’s a little different, scientists have changed, or the time has come, the work is very small, if the sixties and seventies were hard to choose from the equilibrium fundamental works, to the truth of discoveries, today they are choosing and pulling from second-rate works that attracts more to invention. When fraudulent schemes for cutting scientific grants become directly nominated, for example, the “discovery” of the Higgs boson and graphene. The world goes into masturbation of opportunities to cut dough, and everything else is just a means to this.
        3. moroz656
          moroz656 15 October 2015 21: 13 New
          +3
          Mr. M.S. Gorbachev was not ashamed to receive an award for RSD and RMD .... Award from the United States ... as I understand it, a separate item .... Nobody is touching it now.
          1. Flexsus
            Flexsus 15 October 2015 22: 32 New
            +3
            Quote: moroz656
            Mr. M.S. Gorbachev was not ashamed to receive an award for RSD and RMD .... Award from the United States ... as I understand it, a separate item .... Nobody is touching it now.

            This is his 30 silver coins for the betrayal of the motherland. That is hiding now in Germany, next to the Amer’s base. He is afraid that they will hang them on aspen houses. Tobaccos!
        4. Flexsus
          Flexsus 15 October 2015 22: 28 New
          +2
          I completely agree! O.S.K.T.T.s.I.L.s.ya Nobel Committee, all prizes are awarded to some moral freaks! With rare exceptions ... Upfront Peace Prize, paper-makers for literature, Pseudo-economists - for work on the economy that the era of economic crises has passed, and after half a year the 2008 economic crisis has erupted, and many more can be listed ... Personally, I already It's a shame to see such great people like Shelokhov, Alferov in these lists. One gets the feeling that the winners are now selected exactly the opposite.
          1. 34 region
            34 region 15 October 2015 23: 00 New
            0
            Sorry brother! Competitors must be crushed. When was the USSR there was still a counterweight. I had to reckon with my opponent. Today the masks are reset.
        5. 34 region
          34 region 15 October 2015 22: 57 New
          0
          Vyacheslav 64! So decent people today probably do not give the Nobel. Business however! Although Nobel himself, frankly, is far from an angel. Though dynamite, even oil. Typical reptiloid.
        6. The stranger
          The stranger 16 October 2015 04: 00 New
          +3
          Yes, they have reached such a level in physics, so to speak about political disciplines.
          By the way, in my youth she had a book “The war does not have a woman’s face”, and since she had never read anything like it before, she dramatically influenced my attitude to women in the army. Let out in Bulgarian, sorted at school. Then we didn’t have them, I knew only one of my distant cousins ​​who fought with their future husband as a sniper in that war. Both were wounded, crippled already near Vienna, and I had a clear impression that there was no place for women.
          And so I remembered the author, a good one. Then I didn’t read, of course, but she’ll take it and throw such a fortress ...
          In occasion of a typhoon. Pindotrolls were aroused of course, but being illiterate, they were crushed.
          Oh, well, when the aircraft woke up and earned ... :)
      4. Homo
        Homo 15 October 2015 17: 12 New
        15
        Quote: dr.Bo
        Well done, strong words !!!!

        And the meaning of the words. The "foreign potbelly stove" turned out to be smarter and closer to us (in spirit and perception of the situation in the Donbass) than the "daughter of the brotherly people" !!!
        1. The stranger
          The stranger 16 October 2015 07: 46 New
          -3
          Come on.
          All over the world, sane people are sane. Not because they dream of sucking off a Russian. And I’ll tell you a terrible secret - it’s possible not only to understand the secret thoughts of Russians who are, like, inaccessible, just sensual, but they themselves think the same way. Because when they think, it turns out the same way. When they don’t think, it’s like Khuseinovich’s, but this is already a completed stage.
          Although, I wouldn’t be like a shit.
        2. a housewife
          a housewife 16 October 2015 09: 48 New
          0
          Another proof that the title Man does not depend on nationality and place of residence! Like "non-humans."
        3. The comment was deleted.
      5. unic52
        unic52 15 October 2015 18: 35 New
        +2
        very strong! shaking hands Madame!
        1. mirag2
          mirag2 15 October 2015 19: 22 New
          0
          I didn’t read this Aleksievich. But I dare to suggest from quotes in the media, it’s something like the fact that not all Germans were SS animals and just good “dudes” are also not uncommon among them. The tone of the topic is that 5 years ago in Europe was a trend.
          1. The stranger
            The stranger 16 October 2015 04: 04 New
            +1
            No, then she was honest.
            Only people change with age, and so is she.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      6. Shurik70
        Shurik70 15 October 2015 22: 09 New
        +2
        Quote: dr.Bo
        "... Madame, stating this, you are not just lying, you are not just mistaken, you despised reality.

        Sincerely, Helen RISHAR-FAVR ""


        Well no.
        Just a lie. Paid lie.
      7. Oleg552
        Oleg552 16 October 2015 02: 38 New
        -1
        Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here https://dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link Itself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really happened.
      8. Liasenski
        Liasenski 16 October 2015 08: 48 New
        0
        The authorities of the Republic of Belarus want to return the work of this very mod to the school curriculum. Most likely, "The war has no female face." I honestly did not read it, but how Belarus is proud of its Nobel Prize, although with many laureates (including her), I would not even stand next to it.
        1. Lionov
          Lionov 17 October 2015 22: 51 New
          +1
          She is the same Belarusian as I am a Madagascar submariner. A Jewess from Ivano-Frankivsk, a plagiarist and a distortionist. She was noticed in the West back in the late 80s, when she misinterpreted the stories of Afghan soldiers from herself, spun such that even Western liberals the chairs fell. For the rabid Russophobia, she was Jewish, the Jews gave this prize, as well as the "great" anti-Soviet liar-informer camp Isaich, both are made from the same shit. So you shouldn’t be proud of her premium for frank rotten, better be proud of the old man and that there is no stability in Belarus.
      9. Nick
        Nick 16 October 2015 12: 05 New
        0
        Quote: dr.Bo
        Well done, strong words !!!!

        And most importantly, they are true.
      10. aleshka
        aleshka 17 October 2015 13: 23 New
        +1
        Aleksievich is simple! conjuncturist and populist! for the "zinc boys" - I hate it !!!!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. kimanas
    kimanas 15 October 2015 14: 52 New
    78
    If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.
    1. ronin201
      ronin201 15 October 2015 14: 58 New
      21
      Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the defamatory of the Russian Federation. In Jude, they gave Solzhik his "creativity" in schools! I haven’t read solzhik in principle and I won’t!
      1. Vend
        Vend 15 October 2015 15: 03 New
        19
        Quote: ronin201
        Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the defamatory of the Russian Federation. In Jude, they gave Solzhik his "creativity" in schools! I haven’t read solzhik in principle and I won’t!

        Then, to show that even in the West they understand what lies are. And they do not discuss it, but show that not only do we see the truth. There are still decent people in the west.
        1. jjj
          jjj 15 October 2015 15: 32 New
          23
          In this regard, Pasternak's refusal of the award begins to look like a kind of providence
      2. Abbra
        Abbra 15 October 2015 15: 15 New
        -77
        And I thought that the workers and collective farmers who did not read Pasternak and Solzhenitsyn during the USSR, but condemned them in indignant letters, disappeared ...
        1. Not served
          Not served 15 October 2015 15: 32 New
          -88
          And I thought that the workers and collective farmers who did not read Pasternak and Solzhenitsyn during the USSR, but condemned them in indignant letters, disappeared ...


          Unfortunately, grayness is very difficult to treat and does not depend on the system and politics, this is our scourge. And then we wonder why it happened in Ukraine.
          And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.
          1. Corporal Valera
            Corporal Valera 15 October 2015 15: 45 New
            36
            Quote: Not served
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            Ah ha! Fell under the table))) Man ischo about "gray" here writes. Especially touches in the "documentary history" of "40-50 million" innocently killed and thrown into the casemate. In general, Isaich, of course, is a very AFS source, especially when he stars about 100 million dead at the hands of the socialist regime. Mister Did not serve - use a slayer! There you Panavira! Well, or the official history of Ukraine.
            1. Not served
              Not served 15 October 2015 16: 04 New
              -27
              Quote: Not served
              And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.
              Ah ha! Fell under the table))) Man ischo about "gray" here writes. Especially touches in the "documentary history" of "40-50 million" innocently killed and thrown into the casemate. In general, Isaich, of course, is a very AFS source, especially when he stars about 100 million dead at the hands of the socialist regime. Mister Did not serve - use a slayer! There you Panavira! Well, or the official history of Ukraine.


              When people wake up gray - come to power brown

              Strugatsky brothers
              1. Corporal Valera
                Corporal Valera 15 October 2015 16: 08 New
                10
                Quote: Not served
                When people wake up gray - come to power brown

                Og! That’s what I’m looking at, that you are already here, for anti-Sovietism = Russophobia = Nazism
                1. Dry_T-50
                  Dry_T-50 15 October 2015 18: 49 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Corporal Valera
                  Quote: Not served
                  When people wake up gray - come to power brown

                  Og! That’s what I’m looking at, that you are already here, for anti-Sovietism = Russophobia = Nazism

                  Zhirinovsky-Russophobe? Well, you fucking give © Features national hunting
                  1. Corporal Valera
                    Corporal Valera 15 October 2015 20: 09 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
                    Zhirinovsky-Russophobe? Well, you fucking give © Features national hunting

                    Zhirinovsky is the same Russophobe as the liberal. He was not noticed in stubborn anti-Sovietism, except for clowning assaults on an old friend Zyuganov on a zombie man for populist purposes. Any other examples?
                  2. yastr
                    yastr 16 October 2015 15: 08 New
                    0
                    The anti-adviser is always Russophobe (C)
              2. fest 1973
                fest 1973 15 October 2015 17: 01 New
                +5
                If you haven’t served, don’t clog the ether, go to “yours”!
              3. Turkir
                Turkir 16 October 2015 00: 00 New
                +4
                The Strugatsky brothers glorified communism with might and main ... under the communists.
                Then they glorified freedom from the Communists ... after the disappearance of the USSR.
                What are people called changing their principles easily and not for free?
                Aleksievich from among them.
                Their name is legion ...
                1. The stranger
                  The stranger 16 October 2015 04: 33 New
                  +4
                  Well, I’ll intercede for them.
                  Read their work separately, there are several sleeves. It went all the time.
                  They were building a possible future world, blaming them for something - akin to blaming Jules Verne for the damned nuclear submarines that would ruin the world. At that time, there was no stupid ideology as a phenomenon, from the point of view of the current Internet.
                  Believe me offhand is not obliged, because I recommend the book "Worlds of the Strugatsky brothers." It can even be zero, I don’t remember. Surely there is an Internet, I have only paper, I won’t give a link.
                  So you will fall into place.
              4. The stranger
                The stranger 16 October 2015 04: 15 New
                +1
                Holy truth.
                Only the Strugatsky have a different context for this, is it not Undeserving?
                Che climbed, trollik? Maybe the local boys have their own NATO advisers. Don't be so cheap, general :)
              5. aleshka
                aleshka 17 October 2015 13: 28 New
                0
                you're one of them!
          2. Abbra
            Abbra 15 October 2015 15: 54 New
            -24
            Let the minus set. If only Matrenin Dvor would be revered at leisure ...
            1. Corporal Valera
              Corporal Valera 15 October 2015 16: 03 New
              +9
              Epics are better! More reliable, anyway
            2. Vyacheslav 64
              Vyacheslav 64 15 October 2015 16: 05 New
              +8
              And you read the new history of Ukraine, there is much more informative! I read "Matryonin Dvor", read a couple of times, so what? Believe? :)))
            3. Svetlana
              Svetlana 15 October 2015 17: 30 New
              +1
              Quote: Abbra
              Let the minus set. If only Matrenin Dvor would be revered at leisure ...

              If only “Our youth flight” by Alexander Zinoviev or “Secret project of the leader or Neo-Stalinism” by George Sidorov at his leisure would be revered ...
            4. lablizn
              lablizn 15 October 2015 18: 01 New
              +1
              A little higher, I noted the story "Matrenin Dvor" as one of the worthy examples of the literary genre.
              But other?
            5. oldzek
              oldzek 15 October 2015 22: 26 New
              +3
              his early works are simply lovely but the archipelago and fifth wheel are simply unreadable for a man who has lived and has seen something in life.
          3. Vyacheslav 64
            Vyacheslav 64 15 October 2015 16: 03 New
            43
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.
            I don’t know my colleague, where you grew up, in which country, I don’t know who raised you, did the elders tell you about the real, not book history of the USSR. Everything has happened in the history of our country, but so much poison and hatred, like Solzhynitsyn’s, I haven’t heard about from the USSR from any of his peers. There were people among my teachers who were older than this scribbler, there were people who had served their sentences unrighteously, but no one misinterpreted the history and course of events.
            1. forester
              forester 15 October 2015 16: 54 New
              +1
              Quote: Vyacheslav 64
              but as much poison and hatred as Solzhynitsyn’s didn’t I hear about the USSR from any of his peers. There were people among my teachers and older than this scribbler, there were people who had served their sentences unrighteously, but no one misinterpreted the history and course of events

              On the whole, I agree Vadim Tumanov, whose share fell immeasurably more, he rightly considered his release to be an easy out-of-town walk in his book “To lose everything and start again with a dream”, never spat in his homeland But after all, after his release, his life was not honey that he was considered the first Soviet millionaire and not a trader and a scammer of taras
            2. solidus
              solidus 16 October 2015 14: 51 New
              0
              Then Putin awarded him a state prize, established a literary prize in his name.
              And the whole country escorted him to another world.
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. asher
            asher 15 October 2015 16: 21 New
            33
            Yes, a very documentary story. I now live in the center of the former Ozerlag, which so classicly described this classic of pro-American democracy. And I’m still thinking where millions are buried, according to him, innocent lambs killed here. But in America and Europe it is more visible, because such a scale of lies can be estimated as a document only at large distances from the places of events.
            1. Mikado
              Mikado 15 October 2015 16: 40 New
              +9
              Quote: asher
              But in America and Europe it is more visible, because such a scale of lies can be estimated as a document only at large distances from the places of events.

              I caught myself thinking that he had a surname SOLZHEnitsyn .. Apparently, his work and surname came together in life.
              1. Starik72
                Starik72 15 October 2015 22: 39 New
                +1
                Mikado, so Solzhenitsyn can be translated as CREATE A FALSE, hence it can be called SOVRINITSYN!
            2. TVM - 75
              TVM - 75 16 October 2015 05: 52 New
              0
              Just a figure "starred." He intervened at the right time, and then believed in his genius and suffered a darling. The laurels of Lev Nikolaevich did not give rest
          6. emercom1979
            emercom1979 15 October 2015 16: 27 New
            +6
            It can’t be a documentary story by definition. It has a one-sided interpretation and lack of extensive archival references and data. According to the opinion poll in the prison, it was revealed that the whole country is sitting and all those sitting are not guilty .... And the question of not justice WHO WRITTEN DENOSIONS?
            1. Corporal Valera
              Corporal Valera 15 October 2015 16: 40 New
              +9
              ... lack of extensive archival links and data ...

              Well you! Isaich gives a very "extensive" reference: "according to the estimates of the emigrating professor of statistics IA Kurganov." Unquestioned, authority, you see, Isaich had! Apparently, in the intervals between bouts of nostalgia and hard drinking, he carried out his calculations. One gets the feeling that the Solzhenitsyn adherents themselves did not read, but in unanimous approval
            2. Flexsus
              Flexsus 15 October 2015 22: 44 New
              +2
              Quote: emercom1979
              According to the opinion poll in the prison, it was revealed that the whole country was sitting and all those sitting were not guilty .... And the question of not justice WHO WRITTEN DENOSIONS?

              Like who? You ask these lying liberals: Who wrote the denunciations? They answered you and us long ago. This is the quintessence of Universal Evil - Comrade Stalin Joseph Vissarionovich. He wrote denunciations himself, arrested him, judged himself, planted himself and shot himself ...
              1. Corporal Valera
                Corporal Valera 16 October 2015 00: 38 New
                +3
                Quote: Flexsus
                He wrote denunciations himself, arrested him, judged himself, planted himself and shot himself ...

                Yeah! And, as everyone knows, if the blood of innocent victims is poured into railway tanks, then such a composition will go around the Earth! I personally saw this thesis on one forum with my own eyes. I had to prove a moron, with a calculator in my hands, that this is impossible in principle.
          7. Belgorod
            Belgorod 15 October 2015 16: 35 New
            +5
            Did you yourself serve in the army?
            - Yes. Not. And what you need?
            “You are not.”
            - Thank.
            Election Day (film)

            And you better not say
          8. Proud.
            Proud. 15 October 2015 16: 38 New
            10
            Quote: Not served
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            Oh, well !? An art-fiction "work" that has gathered rumors, speculation and outright lies, do you consider "documentary history" !?
          9. Buffalo
            Buffalo 15 October 2015 17: 31 New
            13
            - Stupidity!
            One could consider the works of Varlam Shalamov as such. He didn’t earn extra money for 30 pieces of silver, he didn’t “knock” his “cell-mates” on his cellmates like Solzhenitsyn did. You can continue to consider anything, good, there is a calculator on every computer. It was not in vain that Solzhenitsyn’s cellmates gave the Gnida whoopod, where the person is visible through, and the whooper is a blow not to the eyebrow, but to the eye.
            And he had Vetrov's agent clicher, in all the denunciations he was so named.
          10. Lexeus
            Lexeus 15 October 2015 17: 44 New
            0
            Something I am in doubt that after reading "AG", etc., you began to sort things out, and certainly did not become more intelligent ... Yes, and you read, probably, "superficially" enough, just so that in certain " near "circles proudly declare-" I read, I'm in the subject "... something like that ...
          11. Metallurgist
            Metallurgist 15 October 2015 18: 15 New
            +9
            And why then not a biography of Bear-Jap? Or dad Makhno?
            Solzhenitsyn ... How can you relate to a man who has betrayed his wife, who at the same time, being the wife of a political prisoner, has not abandoned her husband, but has endured everything ...
            Your idol married an American ...
            Well ... Who am I to judge you, for even Judas Iscariot had followers.
          12. The comment was deleted.
          13. 23 region
            23 region 15 October 2015 18: 20 New
            +5
            Quote: Not served
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            HEY! Aleksievich! Ayda to me! As a "colleague," I promise a place in the textbook. (Posthumous)
          14. Captain45
            Captain45 15 October 2015 19: 34 New
            +3
            Quote: Not served
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            Yesterday, on the Empire site, there was a very good article about Solzhenitsker, his whole life path. Read carefully, then karma, in the sense of rating, may not be violated.
          15. oldzek
            oldzek 15 October 2015 22: 20 New
            0
            pseudo-documentary more precisely there is a lot of fiction.
          16. aleshka
            aleshka 17 October 2015 13: 27 New
            0
            and when people are enlightened, blue come to power !!!!
          17. Lionov
            Lionov 17 October 2015 23: 30 New
            +1
            Isaich is a liar and a falsifier. His entire biography, as well as the so-called “creativity”, is one solid lump of lies, starting with the so-called “conspiracy” against Stalin, who himself came up with in order to avoid the front line and further, camp life -2,5 , XNUMX years out of seven, on a bread spot of a camp informer under the pseudonym Vetrov, ending with "creativity", facts and figures invented or taken from the ceiling or events taken out of context. The whole bullshit was mixed with real events, and stood out as the ultimate truth. People who do not know, or are little versed in the historical events of those years, took all this “creativity” as our Father, without even realizing that they were being fooled, and they also receive prizes on this fooling. That’s the same Varlam Shalamov, Isaich except I didn’t call scum, and bequeathed that after his death “this liar and traitor couldn’t even touch my archive with his finger.” So you can continue to read the story from Isaich’s “not living a lie”, just noodles with ears do not forget to take off b.
          18. Kunar
            Kunar 18 October 2015 07: 39 New
            0
            Then I will present the "epoch-documentary history of our country" from 1954 to our years. I’m a contender for Shnobel 2016)))))
        2. asher
          asher 15 October 2015 16: 17 New
          12
          To write such nasty things under such a flag is not good. You, as they say, either remove the cross or put on your underpants. The fact of the matter is that they read semi-journalistic, but giving rise to feelings of admiration for Soviet people, books of this newly appeared Judas in a skirt. Moreover, the degeneration of a normal, seemingly journalist, into a vile Bandera scum looks ugly.
        3. Lexeus
          Lexeus 15 October 2015 17: 52 New
          -4
          Oh, how much pathos, do not burst there from your well-read and important laughing At the same Pasternak, it’s not so simple, although why analyze it, it’s better to shout “The Glory of the Heroes!” and ... and at the same time jump (must jump! otherwise "b")
        4. 23 region
          23 region 15 October 2015 18: 58 New
          +5
          Quote: Abbra
          And I thought that the workers and collective farmers who did not read Pasternak and Solzhenitsyn during the USSR, but condemned them in indignant letters, disappeared ...

          Sorry, not mine, but I totally agree.
          Igor Fedorovich Zelenkovsky - Publicist, member of the Union of Writers of Russia, head of the project "Western Russia".
          ***
          “I didn’t read, but I condemn” - this is the phrase said in relation to B. L. Pasternak, when he was awarded the Nobel Prize and became winged in the USSR, belonged to one of the members of the Union of Writers of the USSR.

          And now the recent news - a Belarusian citizen, writing in Russian in the genre of journalistic investigations, was awarded the Nobel Prize already for literature. When I found out about this, the first flashed thought was that Aleksievich had the same relation to literature as Barack Obama had to "world peace."

          Then he felt sorry for the Belarusian schoolchildren who would be forced to read this nobeliar without the right to condemn. And for sure - the other day the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus informed that from next year Aleksievich will be included in the curriculum.
          Did I read Aleksievich myself? She flipped through her “Unclean face” many years ago, and put it off, because if “not necessary”, then I did not read about it. Then, thank God, it was "optional."

          The third thing that I have already smiled about is how Belarusian writers are now outraged, because the "movable" literature never shines to receive the Nobel. Simple arithmetic is in the third world, where at any moment a “color revolution” may be required, more than a hundred countries, and the next time the turn will reach Belarus only after a hundred years with a hook. Will anyone be awarded then? Perhaps the “creative supolas” will calm down if Alekseevich learns “mov” and fulfills the old wish to the “letters” from the president of Belarus by writing something equal to Tolstoy or Sholokhov, for example, “Tsikhi Neman” or “Vine and Light”. But in her years to learn "mov"?

          But seriously, from this pro-Western Russophobic lady Belarusians are sculpted with unquestioned authority in the last resort. Alas, the Nobel Prize still works as a letter of protection, and the social status of Nobiliar rises above the presidential one. And ahead of the parliamentary elections, which the West requires to be held according to its rules. For Aleksievich, a role about the same as that of Sakharov in the destruction of the USSR was programmed in Belarus. So Belarusians, having said thanks for such a “present”, need to think hard ....
        5. The comment was deleted.
        6. Starik72
          Starik72 15 October 2015 22: 30 New
          +5
          Abbra I read these bastards even when their "works" just appeared in Samizdat. And I always condemned these bastards, Pasternak, Solzhenitsyn, as well as late Sakharov, Khrushchev and the rest of the list who poured slop on the USSR! So we have not disappeared, and we will continue to brand these bastards.
          1. alfa19638
            alfa19638 16 October 2015 00: 15 New
            0
            Thank you!
        7. Kunar
          Kunar 16 October 2015 09: 30 New
          +3
          Why, how)) Read)))) Another year in 1990. Vyderdy like zinc boys with the idea that why the hell do you need a homeland, if you need to fight for it? Ah, my son was seriously wounded, let's give the Wahhabis Russia. But we will be safe ... and tsetera .... All her work in this vein. A mixture of Rezun and Akhedzhakova.
        8. a housewife
          a housewife 16 October 2015 09: 57 New
          0
          And here they are not outraged by her work, but by her lie in real life. If an individual behaves disgustingly, who cares about her professional achievements? Just like her personal life or, there, culinary tastes. She lies, and for this she received a slap in the letter and the indignation of normal people. Let him come to Donetsk, get out on the podium and repeat his lie there. Will they believe her in the Donbass? And what will they answer?
        9. The comment was deleted.
        10. aleshka
          aleshka 17 October 2015 13: 25 New
          0
          You READ Solzhenitsyn ???
      3. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 15: 25 New
        35
        Quote: ronin201
        Why discuss it at all

        Then, that the Nobel no longer exists. It became corrupt, like politics.
        1. Svetlana
          Svetlana 15 October 2015 17: 37 New
          10
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Then, that the Nobel no longer exists. It became corrupt, like politics

          Now this award is an indicator of venality to the enemies of the Russian world. The mark is on the forehead.
        2. taram taramych
          taram taramych 15 October 2015 17: 56 New
          +2
          Well, they discredited her, ShNobilevka, even when Husseinich was advanced. Finally and irrevocably!
          1. Starik72
            Starik72 15 October 2015 22: 53 New
            +2
            Taram taramych, and that Humpback is better than Huseynich, he also received the Nobel Prize, but okay, I don’t feel sorry for what I received, it’s a pity that it’s not due to snobber and a heavy fist!
      4. BAIKAL03
        BAIKAL03 15 October 2015 15: 31 New
        +6
        I support you in this for all 100, I also think that there is nothing like this in Solzhik that our rotten intelligentsia so elevates him. Let the Americans study it and not our children
      5. kizhe
        kizhe 15 October 2015 15: 43 New
        -24
        Quote: ronin201
        Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the defamatory of the Russian Federation. In Jude, they gave Solzhik his "creativity" in schools! I haven’t read solzhik in principle and I won’t!

        Reading the works of smart people is necessary without looking at your subjective attitude towards them. You look and become smarter yourself.
        1. Proud.
          Proud. 15 October 2015 16: 56 New
          +9
          Quote: kizhe
          Reading the works of smart people is necessary without looking at your subjective attitude towards them.

          Of course it is necessary. With the interest of an entomologist. The word “smart” is not synonymous with the word “honest.” And from a fig, is the negative opinion about Solzhenitsyn “subjective”!? Maybe the opposite is OBJECTIVE.
          Quote: kizhe
          You look and become smarter yourself.

          But this is rudeness, a citizen is a fan of Solzhenitsyn.
        2. fest 1973
          fest 1973 15 October 2015 17: 07 New
          +2
          Why didn’t you serve?
        3. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 15 October 2015 18: 40 New
          +4
          Quote: kizhe
          . You look and become smarter yourself.

          This does not apply to you!
        4. Dilshat
          Dilshat 15 October 2015 23: 42 New
          0
          To connect these two things-http: //cont.ws/post/97916 and http://agitpro.su/kiev-otvel-5-let-na-okonchatelnuyu-promyvku-mozgov/ you don’t have to be very smart. nations 6leat. Akunin, Erofeev, Alekseevich come closer to the wall. The place is enough for everyone. The worst thing is that the witnesses and contemporaries of the Gulag also died and there is no one to refute the facts of the "work" of Judas and therefore the corrupting influence of his works on not mature young minds will increase . Of course, if you do not take countermeasures, at least carefully check what and who writes in school history textbooks, without forgetting higher education.
        5. a housewife
          a housewife 16 October 2015 10: 08 New
          0
          Hitler really can’t be called dumb. Tell me, do I have the right to condemn Hitler, although I have not read Mine Kampf? And I also consider his landscapes, though not masterpieces, but rather pleasant?
          1. CONTROL
            CONTROL 16 October 2015 14: 02 New
            +1
            Quote: housewife
            Hitler really can’t be called dumb. Tell me, do I have the right to condemn Hitler, although I have not read Mine Kampf? And I also consider his landscapes, though not masterpieces, but rather pleasant?

            ... Yes, a good artist could have turned out of him ... if he had not climbed into the Fuhrer!
            And he was at the front — in the 1st MV — being a soldier (corporal), he was awarded some kind of medal, an analogue “for courage”; and the Germans are neat people, they don’t give medals to freebies to soldiers! ... He could have had a great and glorious future - family, children, the glory of a great artist and war hero ... And so they recognized the corpse in the backyard of the bunker by tooth formula! ...
      6. emercom1979
        emercom1979 15 October 2015 16: 20 New
        +3
        I recommend reading it. It is indicative of how a person who received a well-deserved punishment tries to rehabilitate with the innocent, citing them as an example and at the same time denigrating the authorities and the system. In short, from the category, all around are to blame, but I'm done.
        1. Kunar
          Kunar 16 October 2015 10: 15 New
          +1
          People appreciated his work .... Posthumously
      7. lablizn
        lablizn 15 October 2015 17: 58 New
        +6
        I read Solzhenitsyn from cover to cover.
        The first reading was "One Day by Ivan Denisovich", published in the New World in the 60s, and read in the early 70s. The impression was disgusting, especially since at that time I served in the army.
        In the nineties he acquired for a penny a complete work (naturally without the last journalism, when he "received his sight").
        I read almost everything, the only thing is that I have not mastered the Gulag Archipelago, which in fact is difficult to imagine as a novel. There is a complete balancing act of names, dates, numbers, etc., which in themselves cause certain doubts. In fact, who provided him with the archival secret information to which he refers?
        Well, about the "sharashka". From the very first pages, so casual, inconspicuous-a lie.
        Implicit, believable in appearance ... but a lie.
        As far as I know, his story “Matrenin Dvor” is held at school and this is the only literary work worth reading.
        1. IAlex
          IAlex 16 October 2015 11: 42 New
          +2
          I worked in this sharashka, and talked with people who caught Solzhenitsyn, and so his whole great contribution was the issuance of logarithmic rulers and a partial verification of the calculations of others with her help, incl. his position was the lowest ...
      8. Flexsus
        Flexsus 15 October 2015 22: 37 New
        +2
        Quote: ronin201
        In Judah, Solzhik was given his “creativity” as a student in schools! I haven’t read solzhik in principle and I won’t

        And I specifically revered this Jew. Now I show to his admirers the words of this para ... that he keeps all his readers for suckers and idiots. The enemy must be known in person. You know his paperwork means armed.
    2. zao74
      zao74 15 October 2015 14: 59 New
      +4
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.
      "Grandmas" rule the world ... Who pays, that "girl" dances.
    3. sir_obs
      sir_obs 15 October 2015 15: 00 New
      +1
      This doesn’t even mean anything.
    4. jaguar
      jaguar 15 October 2015 15: 03 New
      24
      But what is strange ... it turns out that the Swiss writer is much more adequate notice BELARUSIAN !!!!! request
      1. combat66
        combat66 15 October 2015 15: 17 New
        37
        E ...... In it, the Belarusian is only a temporary residence.
        Even before she received the Nobel Prize, he was briefly interested in her work,
        But after the "zinc boys" from this Madame was sick.
        Everywhere there are "white crows", they have their own perception of the world and this is normal. This madame is not a white crow, she lives outside of reality, she is a nesting doll, and a nesting doll with perverted logic! It will swing to the place where it hurts, will turn everything upside down and pass it off as pure truth.
        Figuratively, If you throw a small piece of shit on a fan - the aroma is provided throughout the house. So Aleksievich ... He will find a small piece of shit, add his mighty pile to it and throw it on the fan!
        To her for sure, without Respect!
        1. taram taramych
          taram taramych 15 October 2015 18: 02 New
          +1
          "Novodvorskaya", (not to the night, be remembered), only the Belarusian spill.
          1. Dry_T-50
            Dry_T-50 15 October 2015 18: 57 New
            +5
            Quote: taram taramych
            "Novodvorskaya", (not to the night, be remembered), only the Belarusian spill.

            Enough of blaming normal people! Russia, for example, has Gorbachev and Alekseeva, but we are not the accused of the whole of Russia for the fact that these ur ours are our compatriots
          2. Starik72
            Starik72 15 October 2015 23: 04 New
            +3
            Taram Taranich, this Alekseeva is not of the Belarusian spill, but of Zapvlny, this is a representative of 5 columns!
    5. edge
      edge 15 October 2015 15: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: kimanas
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.

      and with ..... ki always showed up at the time of testing, the time will come and she will dump these grandmothers for the cordon and very quickly.
    6. KazaK Bo
      KazaK Bo 15 October 2015 15: 16 New
      +8
      kimanas
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.

      She is now supposed to say so ... after all, this award is an advance and a launching image platform for the new role of this Madame - IMAGE of the "BELARUSIAN" HAVEL ... IMAGE of the FUTURE PRESIDENT FOR THE POST OF THE PRESIDENT OF BELARUSIA!
      Disappointed in various human rights defenders, the Americans DECIDED TO STOP THEIR CHOICE ON THE NEW INTELLIGENCE ... Now they will begin to promote her person. Just to live a little more enta laureates in Belarus itself ... and then for the last 25 years of living in Zap. Europe and the Belarusian language forgot ...
      And the only thing left for her was a Belarusian spelling ....
      1. Svetlana
        Svetlana 15 October 2015 17: 45 New
        12
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        Disappointed in various human rights defenders, the Americans DECIDED TO STOP THEIR CHOICE AT A NEW INTELLIGENCE ...


        The intelligentsia is a layer between the people and the nobility, devoid of the good taste inherent in the people. - Vyacheslav Pleve

        Try to ask our intellectuals questions: what is war, patriotism, the army, military specialty, military valor? Ninety out of a hundred will answer you: war is a crime, patriotism is a relic of antiquity, the army is the main brake on progress, the military specialty is a shameful craft, military valor is a manifestation of stupidity and atrocity ... - Evgeny Martynov

        I don’t believe in our intelligentsia, hypocritical, false, hysterical, ill-bred, lying, I don’t believe even when she suffers and complains, because her oppressors come out of her bowels ... - Anton Chekhov

        The despotism of an intelligent and therefore privileged minority, as if it is better to understand the real interests of the people than the people themselves, is especially terrible. Firstly, representatives of this minority will try at all costs to lay the lives of future generations in the Procrustean bed of their ideal. Secondly, these twenty or thirty intellectual scientists will bite among themselves ... - Mikhail Bakunin
        1. lablizn
          lablizn 15 October 2015 18: 16 New
          +3
          Thank you, Svetlana!
          You still forgot Dostoevsky and Chernyshevsky; they have a similar assessment of the “Russian intelligentsia”.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. a housewife
            a housewife 16 October 2015 10: 13 New
            0
            That is, Dostoevsky and Chernyshevsky themselves are not the intelligentsia? And then who? Or were they of the same opinion about themselves?
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. Starik72
          Starik72 15 October 2015 23: 07 New
          0
          Absolutely agree with you Svetlana !!!
    7. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 15 October 2015 15: 33 New
      17
      Quote: kimanas
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.

      The whole world saw the price of the Nobel Prize when it was received by Humpback and Obama. And so on the literature! Of course, there are many worthy writers there. But Aleksievich is still from the company of Solzhenitsyn and Churchill. Pure policy. If I was in music, they would give Makarevich ... negative And Chapek, by the way, was not given a prize for criticizing the Nazi government of Germany ... So, those who criticize today's Ukraine and the USA cannot see the prize.
  4. Altona
    Altona 15 October 2015 14: 55 New
    +6
    These diploma winners of various awards for literature and cinema have one theme - to smear thicker dirt on Russia and call it “the fight against lies” ... If a writer or director in the former Soviet Union was given a prize or a prize, then there can be no doubt that first-class muck has been made. ..
  5. katalonec2014
    katalonec2014 15 October 2015 14: 56 New
    +5
    Such a prize was ruined.
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 15 October 2015 14: 59 New
      +7
      It all started with a peace prize to ram Obama?
      1. asher
        asher 15 October 2015 16: 24 New
        +2
        And not from Hitler by accident?
    2. Altona
      Altona 15 October 2015 15: 33 New
      +8
      Quote: katalonec2014
      Such a prize was ruined.

      ------------------
      It has always been presented as exactly Russophobic or anti-Soviet art, almost always ...
  6. Decathlon
    Decathlon 15 October 2015 14: 57 New
    +2
    Late! This bucket of loot has already received and became popular ...
    1. brasist
      brasist 15 October 2015 15: 30 New
      +6
      She stood on a par with a teddy bear marked with a black obama and such jackals zapadentsy love ...
  7. Pogran
    Pogran 15 October 2015 14: 57 New
    +2
    - Su-24M bombers in the area of ​​the village of Qusayr al-Ward, Aleppo province, hit the command post of ISIS fighters, equipped in one of the two-story buildings. A direct hit by an aerial bomb destroyed the object, ”Konashenkov said.

    In addition, in the suburb of the village of El Atareb, Idlib province, Su-25 attack aircraft hit an underground workshop, which produced high-explosive mines for subsequent laying on highways in the area, TASS reports.

    Konashenkov also noted that a masked base had been identified by means of aerial reconnaissance in the Magar mountain range, Damascus province. At this facility there were three armored vehicles and eight off-road vehicles with heavy machine guns and mortars installed.

    “A couple of Russian Su-25 attack aircraft launched a fire attack on this base, which destroyed the equipment located at the facility, as well as fuel and ammunition supplies,” he noted.
    1. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 15 October 2015 15: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Pogran
      - Su-24M bombers near the village of Qusayr al-Ward, Aleppo province, hit the command post of ISIS fighters,


      Troll patriot? original ...
    2. kil 31
      kil 31 15 October 2015 15: 02 New
      +1
      Helen RICHAR-FAVR
      I don’t know, I didn’t read it, but if I write normal, I can give her some sort of our bonus. We probably have some sort of literature prize.
      1. Bekas1967
        Bekas1967 15 October 2015 15: 58 New
        +6
        Yes, she does not need bonuses! She is happy that she lives in harmony with her conscience. She will not have to repent, she will not be haunted by the grief and despair of those people who burned in Odessa ... unlike this woman
      2. your1970
        your1970 15 October 2015 16: 05 New
        11
        Modern Swiss writer. By education - a linguist; She taught French and did research at the University of Geneva.
        Her first collection of short stories, "Stories of No One," was published by URSS in 2004 (bilingual French-Russian; 2-th ed. M: URSS, 2010). The book immediately attracted the attention of readers and literary critics, who noted the originality of the plots and the author’s brilliant stylistic innovations.
        Among his “teachers," Helen Richard-Favre calls, first of all, Dostoevsky; the works of such Russian writers as Tolstoy, Chekhov and Pasternak, had a significant impact on her literary work.

        Helene Richard-Favre speaks Russian well and often visits Russia. In one of her interviews, she admitted: “Honestly, only when I saw the Russian translation of my book did I fully feel like a writer.”
        Congratulations to the Swiss writer Helen Richard-Favre with the third prize in the international competition “Reading Petersburg 2013: Choosing the Best Foreign Writer” in the nomination “Best Foreign Writer, whose works are published in Russian translation”!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  8. Black_PR
    Black_PR 15 October 2015 15: 00 New
    +4
    Consonant with Makarevich ... or just coincided?
    1. combat66
      combat66 15 October 2015 15: 21 New
      +8
      It did not coincide, the twins from one cesspool.
      1. Dry_T-50
        Dry_T-50 15 October 2015 19: 05 New
        +1
        Quote: combat66
        It did not coincide, the twins from one cesspool.

        From the same r'od (no offense to all normal Jews), as Valtsman and Berezovsky
  9. Djozz
    Djozz 15 October 2015 15: 02 New
    +3
    You should not have Helene Favre, at the end you attributed this respect to the breeches!
  10. sever.56
    sever.56 15 October 2015 15: 04 New
    25
    Everything you need to know about Aleksievich and her attitude to the USSR, Russia and Russians can be understood if you know who reads it:
    K. Borovoi, a longtime friend of Novodvorskaya, who had stumbled, said this: “Lerochka (Novodvorskaya) always gladly reread the magnificent works of Svetlana Aleksievich, full of truth and grief.”
    I think that with this character everything is clear and questions should not arise.
    1. Alexey Boukin
      Alexey Boukin 15 October 2015 15: 09 New
      +3
      But as they say: "... in the family there are not freaks ..." Unfortunately, in our family such freaks are decent ... I will not list their names, once again PR.
  11. asiat_61
    asiat_61 15 October 2015 15: 04 New
    +9
    Smart Woman, put a fool in her place. There are people in Europe.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 15 October 2015 15: 07 New
      14
      Quote: asiat_61
      put the fool in place

      A person without a conscience is very difficult to "put in place", alas. recourse
      1. asiat_61
        asiat_61 15 October 2015 15: 10 New
        +1
        Read her remarks about Russia and Russians at Izborsk Club.
    2. Uncle VasyaSayapin
      Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 16: 25 New
      +1
      Why a fool? Smart bastards full. If a person is a traitor or just an enemy, then this does not mean that he is. request
      1. a housewife
        a housewife 16 October 2015 10: 18 New
        0
        he is not in the mental sense, but in the sense - "in life." Diagnosis: no mental abnormalities revealed, just d-u-r-a-k. By the way, the word is quite literary, but they do not let it pass.
  12. 3vs
    3vs 15 October 2015 15: 04 New
    +2
    Something the news on the Military Review is several days late.
  13. Byordovvv1
    Byordovvv1 15 October 2015 15: 12 New
    0
    The signature is painfully annoying ... "Best regards, Helen RISHAR-FAVR "
    1. ma_shlomha
      ma_shlomha 15 October 2015 15: 19 New
      +3
      This appeal is "wired" into the Normal.dot template (WORD text editor), which is used by Swiss writer Helen Richard-Favre when writing letters.
    2. taram taramych
      taram taramych 15 October 2015 18: 13 New
      +1
      They all reached the signature. The letter is open.
      Quote: Byordovvv1
      "Sincerely, Helen RISHAR-FAVR"
      , addressed to readers. The attitude to the grief writer is stated in the text of the letter.
  14. Vadimsh
    Vadimsh 15 October 2015 15: 14 New
    +2
    But Madame Aleksievich needs to work out a grand, how not to call her a prize, very outstanding ..
  15. venaya
    venaya 15 October 2015 15: 14 New
    0
    “This is an occupation, this is a foreign invasion,” said Aleksiyevich.

    As for the occupation, in a sense she is right, the truth is not at all in the sense that she means it. Every revolution, with foreign support, is a form of occupation. I think it's hard to argue.
  16. Velizariy
    Velizariy 15 October 2015 15: 14 New
    +1
    Quote: 3vs
    Something the news on the Military Review is several days late.

    Censorship)))
  17. Born in USSR
    Born in USSR 15 October 2015 15: 18 New
    +3
    This Madame people writes in the same way as Solzhenitsyn. This genius made advances stock and then the point. He did not write anything worthwhile, for that yell was to heaven, a genius damn it. And this liberal cat also does not write anything worthwhile. What they say from Fashington is what he writes. Their Judas right now the sea.
  18. karal
    karal 15 October 2015 15: 22 New
    +1
    Madame Aleksievich Nobel Prize, and Mr. D. Medvedev Order of Merit for the Fatherland. What is there to be surprised at?
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 15 October 2015 18: 53 New
      0
      Quote: karal
      Mr. D. Medvedev Order of Merit to the Fatherland.

      He did not need to be given an order, but a one-way ticket no closer than 100 kilometers from the Government. And without the right to return! It is interesting to know what kind of merits he has for the Fatherland, if after his "reign" EVERYTHING that he invented has to either be redone or returned to normal! And then what did he "deserve" this?
      1. asiat_61
        asiat_61 16 October 2015 08: 59 New
        +1
        Not closer than 100 km from the state border of Russia. From the outside.
  19. parafoiler
    parafoiler 15 October 2015 15: 24 New
    +1
    Dizziness from own significance and imaginary infallibility, multiplied by Nobel laurels ... Why is it so covered after the bonus that they begin to believe that they grabbed the Lord God by the beard ?!
  20. alexbg2
    alexbg2 15 October 2015 15: 34 New
    +2
    Quote: ronin201
    Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the defamatory of the Russian Federation. In Jude, they gave Solzhik his "creativity" in schools! I haven’t read solzhik in principle and I won’t!

    What is "solzhik" or at least in what language?
    1. stasimar
      stasimar 15 October 2015 15: 45 New
      +1
      dismissive Solzhenitsyn. as I understand it.)
    2. kizhe
      kizhe 15 October 2015 15: 54 New
      0
      Quote: alexbg2
      Quote: ronin201
      Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the defamatory of the Russian Federation. In Jude, they gave Solzhik his "creativity" in schools! I haven’t read solzhik in principle and I won’t!

      What is "solzhik" or at least in what language?

      Read above
    3. Uncle VasyaSayapin
      Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 15: 58 New
      +5
      The man who lied to the whole world wink
    4. Bekas1967
      Bekas1967 15 October 2015 16: 01 New
      0
      Such a writer was Solzhenitsyn ... turned history a bit like that ... gulag archipelago
      1. Uncle VasyaSayapin
        Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 16: 33 New
        +4
        Turned the story of Stalin. And this one got it. But the point is not only in it. In the end, the Gulag Archipelago is a work of art, and the author can lie as he wants. Tolkien also wrote books. Nobody says that he is a liar. But the fact that this author and admirers of his “talent” —or maybe it’s just the denunciators of his country who give out these horror films as a history textbook — this is absolutely unacceptable!
  21. pts-m
    pts-m 15 October 2015 15: 41 New
    +1
    as we can see, it’s very easy to verify a person with Patriotism and the Brotherhood. It’s not in vain that there is a saying among the people ... if you want to know a person, then give him a briefcase with money ...
  22. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 15 October 2015 15: 41 New
    0
    Article about a decent person ....
  23. Andryukha G
    Andryukha G 15 October 2015 15: 45 New
    +3
    The war against RUSSIA has never ceased in the last 500 years, and for the last 70 years it has only fallen asleep and only a fool can talk about some polar worlds, there is a confrontation and you need to show your teeth in it if you do not want to be eaten.
    1. venaya
      venaya 15 October 2015 17: 57 New
      -2
      Quote: Andryukha G
      The war against RUSSIA has never stopped in the last 500 years, and for the last 70 years it has only sunk ...

      According to my immodest data, a little more, 1000 years for sure, and if you take into account archeology, it comes out more than 3 years to a minimum.
    2. a housewife
      a housewife 16 October 2015 10: 24 New
      +2
      "do not want you not to be eaten" is equal to "want to be eaten". You need to be more careful with particles, they can turn the entire text.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  24. NordUral
    NordUral 15 October 2015 15: 50 New
    +4
    This "laureate" is another Russophobic deceitful su_ka like Solzhenitsinin and K.
    1. Uncle VasyaSayapin
      Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 16: 05 New
      0
      It’s more difficult to say. It's a pity you can’t put more pluses. And not everyone reads komenty to the bottom. good
  25. stasimar
    stasimar 15 October 2015 15: 53 New
    +3
    Granny, this shame, unfortunately another, is for Belarus. where do they all come from !? Among my many friends, acquaintances, colleagues, etc., I have not met anyone who would sympathize with the Ukrainian government or at least be sympathetic to its actions. about all sorts of Russophobia and other misanthropes, I learn exclusively in the net. skillfully masked bastards?
  26. wild
    wild 15 October 2015 15: 55 New
    +3
    Is there an answer ???? And will not be. And the writer, laureate from Belarus, was a bugbear and drin who will be able to hunt Lukashenko and build an anti-Russian Belarus. You will see.
  27. Andryukha G
    Andryukha G 15 October 2015 16: 01 New
    +8
    It turns out that not everyone was frostbitten in the West, there are those who spit in the face of a corrupt twwa ... and maybe.
  28. Indifferent
    Indifferent 15 October 2015 16: 02 New
    +5
    The West just does not give Nobel Prizes for peace and literature. These prizes are given to those who do not have a very important human quality - conscience.
    I will not say that it has always been so. But now it is just that.
    I wanted something to find their writings and read this writer Alekseevich. Now I won’t. I don’t see the point!
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. Frigate
    Frigate 15 October 2015 16: 08 New
    +2
    It is necessary that this madam scribbler, Lukashenko sent for correctional labor. Labor for the benefit of society ennobles. In general, to her pig farm. smile
  31. Donrumum
    Donrumum 15 October 2015 16: 14 New
    +3
    The article is not about the Nobel Prize and what it is. corrupt or not, and not the great Russian authors, Sholokhov, Solzhenitsyn and other laureates, many of whom were expelled from the country and tearfully (after years) requested back. Dostoevsky’s example here is like a star on the Moscow Kremlin. An article about the reaction of a living woman who freely thinks and sympathizes with grief (an immeasurable 100% of the authors of local comments) of people, Russian people in the Donbas. Honor and praise be to her. I wish all “couch generals” wrote such a letter, everyone, maybe then a person (who calls himself an author), a Nobel laureate, will think about it and will not be able to follow. just blatantly lie about 86%.
    1. combat66
      combat66 15 October 2015 16: 35 New
      +9
      Do you think the “couch generals” didn’t write to her? She was even brought to trial in Belarus for the Zinc Boys.
      There is a very short phrase about which all arguments are broken - "And Che ..?" The pompous Aleksievich will answer you with a variety of arguments. The result will be the same "And what ?!".
      She is an enemy, an enemy of both Russian and Belarusian. What do you think, to whom and for what have they recently been awarded the Nobel?
  32. pofigisst74
    pofigisst74 15 October 2015 16: 36 New
    +5
    The nerves of iron in this Swiss writer. I couldn’t write like that. I would have a solid mat! am
  33. sania1304
    sania1304 15 October 2015 16: 41 New
    -14
    Oh my God ... Yes, as much as you can! For you, dear, Syria did. Discuss her. When will this idiocy end? ..
    1. Frigate
      Frigate 15 October 2015 16: 57 New
      +1
      Quote: sania1304
      Oh my God ... Yes, as much as you can! For you, dear, Syria did. Discuss her. When will this idiocy end? ..


      Who are you to her?
      1. sania1304
        sania1304 15 October 2015 17: 10 New
        -13
        no one. However, the statements from the series “Here the Nazis raped and shot everyone, and our brave guys in Germany shot only one cow, and that’s because the rabid one” was already fed up. Be realistic. But this is for another topic ...
    2. Kolyma
      Kolyma 16 October 2015 03: 19 New
      +1
      as much as necessary, because this topic affects me personally ... but we will take your point of view into account :)

      I almost forgot, people created Syria, the peoples living there in order to raise children, to live to love and build. and not for fun to anyone.
  34. Londa
    Londa 15 October 2015 16: 55 New
    +7
    Quote: sania1304
    Oh my God ... Yes, as much as you can! For you, dear, Syria did. Discuss her. When will this idiocy end?

    without snotty we'll figure out what we should discuss ...
    1. sania1304
      sania1304 15 October 2015 17: 06 New
      -12
      the fact that Danbas is the result of an internal conflict, without the participation of Russia, is only snotty and can discuss. And do not be rude. Respected.
      1. Seaman77
        Seaman77 15 October 2015 17: 51 New
        +8
        Quote: sania1304
        what is Danbas ....


        Everything immediately became clear who you are and where ...

        Even the Swiss writer Helen RISHAR-FAVR knows how to spell the word "Donbass"

        This, like many other similar cases of killings and destruction in the Donbass


        So keep your “tips” with you. We will figure out what to discuss and what not.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Valentine
        Valentine 15 October 2015 18: 52 New
        +4
        That's about Donbass, Alexander, you don’t need to say that. What
        in order to understand something about what is happening there, you need to feel with your own skin all the bestial hatred of "non-upright" towards its inhabitants, go under the bombing and shelling of Ukrainian brothers, collect in parts the remains of your near and dear ones for burial, and then reason
        that internal is a conflict, or "aggression" of Russia.
        You never understand this, you don’t have a homeland, you only have a place to live, which YOU most likely also hate, as well as the country you live in. The tragedy of your family is not unique, it is similar to mine, like millions other families. But carrying so many generations of anger and hatred is the last thing. Can it be rethought, understand something, forgive something, obey something, and it becomes easier and brighter on the soul?
      4. gray
        gray 15 October 2015 18: 55 New
        +1
        But it’s not fair to say that Russia is to blame for everything. We will not deny that the United States and the EU are not implicated and even more so than Russia, because they were at the origins of the so-called popular movement (Maidan). Causes and consequences.
  35. koralvit
    koralvit 15 October 2015 16: 58 New
    +1
    She received the Nobel Prize for her lie. Therefore, she will lie further, only even cooler.
  36. Zai pali
    Zai pali 15 October 2015 17: 27 New
    +1
    This is a business, nothing personal. She earned. As Obama is a laureate. It’s funny.
  37. midashko
    midashko 15 October 2015 17: 34 New
    0
    Nobel prizes are given not anyhow to anyone, but to trusted people. Like this laureate.
  38. Panikovsky
    Panikovsky 15 October 2015 17: 36 New
    +3
    it seems to me that the Nobel Committee should abolish the distribution of prizes in the fields of literature, economics and the struggle for peace. he’s not free and engaged on these issues, shame on you, nob-komovtsy guys, distributing their prizes to anyone, but rather someone ordered, to discredit, in principle, a good idea. look, twenty years later, when you pose the question, only the tramp and lumpen will have to award it, decent people will not go after her.
  39. Buffalo
    Buffalo 15 October 2015 17: 43 New
    +5
    Strictly speaking, even the book “There is no woman’s face in the war”, published back in the USSR, already had very biased facts, in the spirit of mild anti-Sovietism and anti-Stalinism. This comrade-in-arms of Akhedzhakova and Makarevich did not dare to speak openly. - In the USSR they could be sent as Bukovsky for this, or put, like Novodvorskaya, in a prison psychiatric hospital. By the way, I met the latter personally, more than once I had the opportunity to watch and talk to her. So, obsessive thoughts haunted her constantly. And it was visible. Shkonka Novodvorskaya freed up and Aleksievich marks her today. We wish her dream come true.
  40. Kelwin
    Kelwin 15 October 2015 17: 52 New
    +2
    Nah yes, pretend. Here are 86, not 85 and not 90, namely 86.
    Ms. Svetlana Aleksievich, you should be careful, otherwise you can easily break the point by 86%.

    Threat. who is too lazy to look to send a mat here:
    Galina Dursthoff Literary Agency
    http://www.dursthoff.de
    Email: [email protected]
  41. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 15 October 2015 18: 06 New
    +2
    Quote: OlegLex
    We are Russian and differ from the cursed Anglo-Saxons in that, unlike them, we have a very developed sense of justice, so why are you surprised? !! The Nobel Prize has long become a political tool, doesn’t you have anything to say about the Obama Peace Prize in the 2008 year, they just elected him a preserve ... (oops) as president, he was already declared a peacemaker and awarded, or the previous literature prize was handed to a Chinese writer a dissident, not for writing better than the classics, but for being a dissident.
    So something like this. and about justice, so if it will triumph, it is only here in Russia. because only Russians are capable of dying not only for the idea but also for justice.

    golden words
  42. boris117
    boris117 15 October 2015 18: 16 New
    +6
    "The Belarusian writer said that in Russia" 86% of people were happy about the "killing of people in Donetsk."
    That's why she received the Nobel Prize. For the heinous lie about Russia.
  43. Andrew
    Andrew 15 October 2015 18: 20 New
    +2
    Quote: Svetlana
    Quote: KazaK Bo
    Disappointed in various human rights defenders, the Americans DECIDED TO STOP THEIR CHOICE AT A NEW INTELLIGENCE ...


    The intelligentsia is a layer between the people and the nobility, devoid of the good taste inherent in the people. - Vyacheslav Pleve

    Try to ask our intellectuals questions: what is war, patriotism, the army, military specialty, military valor? Ninety out of a hundred will answer you: war is a crime, patriotism is a relic of antiquity, the army is the main brake on progress, the military specialty is a shameful craft, military valor is a manifestation of stupidity and atrocity ... - Evgeny Martynov

    I don’t believe in our intelligentsia, hypocritical, false, hysterical, ill-bred, lying, I don’t believe even when she suffers and complains, because her oppressors come out of her bowels ... - Anton Chekhov

    The despotism of an intelligent and therefore privileged minority, as if it is better to understand the real interests of the people than the people themselves, is especially terrible. Firstly, representatives of this minority will try at all costs to lay the lives of future generations in the Procrustean bed of their ideal. Secondly, these twenty or thirty intellectual scientists will bite among themselves ... - Mikhail Bakunin
    and after: I would like to know, and with whom did the cited authors identify?
  44. kotyara
    kotyara 15 October 2015 18: 26 New
    +2
    How can a liar be respected? Not a mistaken one, namely a liar who perfectly understands what he is saying and what he is saying either for money or for money!
    1. Frigate
      Frigate 15 October 2015 18: 56 New
      +3
      Quote: cat
      How can a liar be respected? Not a mistaken one, namely a liar who perfectly understands what he is saying and what he is saying either for money or for money!

      No, well, like Western civilization, who prevents it from dumping and living there. No, he doesn’t leave, because no one needs her there. There, apparently, she will not be able to offer the West anything but herself. And here, and here you can sell the homeland.
      She is not just a liar; one must call a spade a spade. She is a traitor.
  45. afrikanez
    afrikanez 15 October 2015 18: 54 New
    -5
    There you have the brotherly people. angry How to deal with such is not clear. Listen. what such brothers and sisters say is not possible at all.
    1. NDR-791
      NDR-791 15 October 2015 20: 22 New
      +4
      You PEOPLE with one separately licked poop do not confuse, please!
    2. Pissarro
      Pissarro 16 October 2015 12: 12 New
      +2
      You are an aunt born in Ivano-Frankivsk, the heart of Banderostan, just because of the presence of her Belarusian passport, do not ascribe to the fraternal people. She is a sister to galloping maydauns
  46. olezenka1
    olezenka1 15 October 2015 19: 11 New
    +2
    Quote: cat
    How can a liar be respected? Not a mistaken one, namely a liar who perfectly understands what he is saying and what he is saying either for money or for money!


    Alekseevich-Enemy. Explicit, distinct, unequivocal Enemy of our Country.
  47. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 15 October 2015 19: 25 New
    +6
    Lying is her job. You can write at least 100500 letters, but this creature will continue to crap.
    Although I’m not a supporter of such methods, a life-giving ice ax would obviously have benefited this Alekseevich ...
  48. nail
    nail 15 October 2015 19: 29 New
    +8
    Solzhenitsyn is one of the criminals who destroyed the USSR. He deflected from the front and realized that it is better to criticize the Soviet system and sit in the zone than to go under bullets. I did not find anything literary in his opuses. And this scum at one time tried to discredit Sholokhov. And this not a writer, this representative of the ideological front directed against Russia and Belarus.
    1. Buffalo
      Buffalo 15 October 2015 21: 07 New
      +1
      Fortunately, Solzhenitsyn’s retribution nevertheless overtook!
      At the end of his life, this lackey of the West and Judah, his comrades-in-arms poked their faces on the table, told them not to rock the boat and shut up, and sent them to the dacha, to life imprisonment, where he died.
  49. Alekspel
    Alekspel 15 October 2015 19: 35 New
    +7
    And what great did she write? What great did Solzhenitsyn write? Or Parsnip? Of all the Nobel laureates in literature from our country, only Sholokhov is truly deserved. So he really wrote the truth and didn’t lick the west. And the others were given the Nobel Prize only because they poured dirt on their country. Well, now we all know the true price of the “Western values” and the price of such alexievichs. Every day we see on the TV screen Nadezhdin, Gozman and others like them, who are just busy pouring mud on the country in which they live. And now everyone understands that it’s not just that they do it, but for the green Amerian ruble. Alekseeva has been slandering her country all her life, but she doesn’t go to the United States because she doesn’t need her there, she should be crap here, and they pay her for that. Do not worry after two months, no one will remember this alexievich, because in itself it is of no interest to anyone. And the country on which she spits has been and will be great for centuries.
  50. With Petrovsky
    With Petrovsky 15 October 2015 20: 13 New
    +3
    Now, probably one of the prerequisites to teach the Nobel is to be slandered at the direction of someone.
    1. German Titov
      German Titov 15 October 2015 23: 27 New
      +3
      "Nuna does not slander anyone, but Rush." If I’m walking in the streets of Donetsk in a T-shirt with the image of the President of the Neighboring Country, it’s normal. If I "foolishly" walk in a T-shirt, through the streets of Donetsk, with the image of the "president of a neighboring country" (I don’t have so much health). It’s very difficult in Donetsk to survive “we’re happy”. Ecology, Mlyn ... But “we are in the ATE in Debaltsevo“ PEREMOGLI ”. I recommend to watch the“ watch brad ”- get inspired by the“ ringing ”...