Swiss writer - Nobel laureate-2015: "Madame Aleksievich, you are not just lying ..."

224
Swiss writer Helen Richard-Favre (Hélène Richard-Favre), author of the books “Nouvelles de nulle part”, “Nouvelles de rien” and “Nouvelles de Personne” addressed an open letter to Svetlana Aleksievich, Nobel Prize winner-2015 in literature.
Recall that the Belarusian writer Svetlana Alexievich at a press conference in Minsk after she received the Nobel Prize stated that the war in Donbass, which killed more than 8 thousand people, was the result of foreign intervention.

“This is an occupation, this is a foreign invasion,” said Aleksiyevich.

Also, a Belarusian writer said that in Russia “86% of people became happy” to kill people in Donetsk.

We give the text of the open letter Helene Richard-Favre, which she wrote Alexievich.

“Madam Aleksievich,

in the Donbas, which you mentioned during your press conference, a woman named Lilia, 24's, broke off her leg when, following her maternal instinct, she covered her 11-month-old son with her body. They were both on the bus, which was under fire.

This, like many other similar cases of murder and destruction in the Donbas, is the result of government action, which is supported by the West.

I urge you to read this article by a French journalist who is in Donetsk: http://dnipress.com/fr/posts/lilia-24-ans-une-jambe-arrachee-elle-sauve-son-petit-garcon/

What happened to Lilia is far from an isolated incident, and I hope you understand this. (Lily was treated in Moscow, - Ed.)

We all have to choose the topics about which we write. You made your choice and found your audience that admires them.

But you, the one that made the basis of your creativity the fight against lies, how can you claim that 86% of Russians rejoice in the deaths of people in the Donbas?

Madame, by stating this, you are not just lying, you are not just mistaken, you have disdained reality.

Sincerely, Helen RISHAR-FAVR "
224 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +132
      15 October 2015 15: 33
      "... Madam, in stating this, you are not just lying, you are not just delusional, you have disdained reality.

      Best regards, Helene RICHARD-FAVRE ""
      Well done, strong words !!!! hi
      1. +90
        15 October 2015 15: 43
        But with respect, she is in vain!
        1. +66
          15 October 2015 16: 21
          Quote: Estet59
          But with respect, she is in vain!

          but it's probably just the innate politeness of a cultured person
          1. +57
            15 October 2015 17: 41
            Where the world is heading ..... If already the Nobel Prizes are given not to those who are worthy, but to those who are nicer to lick ....
            After such things, you begin to lose faith in humanity in general, and in the fact that justice will ever triumph on this fucking planet .....
            Ugh((((...
            1. +54
              15 October 2015 17: 51
              We are Russian and differ from the cursed Anglo-Saxons in that, unlike them, we have a very developed sense of justice, so why are you surprised? !! The Nobel Prize has long become a political tool, doesn’t you have anything to say about the Obama Peace Prize in the 2008 year, they just elected him a preserve ... (oops) as president, he was already declared a peacemaker and awarded, or the previous literature prize was handed to a Chinese writer a dissident, not for writing better than the classics, but for being a dissident.
              So something like this. and about justice, so if it will triumph, it is only here in Russia. because only Russians are capable of dying not only for the idea but also for justice.
              1. +10
                16 October 2015 02: 04
                Justice is what many want, but they do not want it even more, because it is it that interferes with living the life of a parasite with a human body. Justice itself is a great force, but when it is “covered” from head to toe with lies, many begin to think that it should be so. How can this be explained to many that it is they who, by their deeds, make the world worse than what could really be, if many had the imaginary hope that "kings", ie those who live not according to work, but according to "position", maybe there are many? Why are there so many people willing to play the lottery with the conviction that I will win?
              2. +13
                16 October 2015 10: 52
                Forgot to mention also Alexander Isaevich. "Gulag Archipelago" - what is it - literature?
            2. +23
              15 October 2015 18: 33
              These prizes are given to those who are worthy in the opinion of the committee.
              So, that is not surprising.
              This is a naughty policy! There really wasn’t there.
              The Nobel Committee, elected by the Norwegian Parliament!
              Either the committee is served before the winner (US president, the European Union, etc.), or the winner is served.
              Occasionally they will give it to someone from another "camp", but this is more for the committee's own status.
              A cuckoo praises a rooster for praising a cuckoo!
              Nothing new)))
            3. +2
              15 October 2015 20: 00
              And this is a well-known practice.
            4. +11
              15 October 2015 22: 16
              The Nobel Prize is just another western bullshit, like all western ones.
              Justice there never smelled.
              Can you imagine the arrogant and justice at the same time? and the Norwegians have been lying under them for a very long time
            5. +8
              15 October 2015 22: 50
              Nobel give those who are worthy? It already seems to me that they give her out for loyalty to certain circles, views, and guidelines. And this orientation is England, USA.
            6. +1
              16 October 2015 03: 26
              And they were always given just that, with rare exceptions like Sholokhov.
            7. +4
              16 October 2015 07: 01
              The Nobel Prize has been politicized almost from its very existence.
              And the "Nobel Prize" in literature has always been Russophobic.

              Regarding this Aleksievich: I began to search in the internet for reviews of her books. More than 20 pages of responses to the request - only laudatory reviews and admired criticism.
              How can this be? Even at the request of criticism for the works of recognized masters of the pen, even then up to 20-30 percent of the references are criticized negative, even negative.

              But, apparently, for the sake of the desired laureate, you can try and clean.
            8. +1
              16 October 2015 17: 08
              All this Nobel Prize is just PR of "necessary" people and ideas!
            9. +1
              16 October 2015 18: 37
              who told you what was wrong? At one time, Musolini was given the Nobel Prize and even Hitler was a laureate, Obama and Gorbachev received, well, just very worthy people !!!
            10. Mwg
              0
              16 October 2015 19: 18
              Gorbachev, for example, was given the Nobel Prize ...
            11. +2
              16 October 2015 19: 53
              Duc Milton Friedman was also given the Nobel Prize in economics, but Pinochet, who followed his theories in the economic field, to put it mildly, failed, like most shock therapy countries. I do not think that the issuance of such prizes is apolitical
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +7
            15 October 2015 18: 39
            this is the standard style of writing letters (ethics of correspondence), but the essence is translated very well! Aleksievich - shaking hands Madame! I do not believe her writings, she is simply disgusting in her subjectivity!
          4. The comment was deleted.
            1. win
              +8
              15 October 2015 20: 30
              Only now I am tormented by vague doubts about the commitment of our "partners" to the old school

              Sometimes diplomatic language infuriates me too.
              I once said VVP about "wet in the toilet", so much screeching and howling was. Unbalanced ...
              We must often tell them like that in the face of the face ...
        2. +3
          15 October 2015 17: 10
          Quote: Estet59
          But with respect, she is in vain!

          This is just politeness, nothing personal.
        3. +17
          15 October 2015 18: 39
          At the entrance they hung a note: "When will you stop drilling day and night? And so on .. Let’s die! Yours faithfully, neighbors."
        4. +4
          15 October 2015 18: 50
          It's just that someone remains a person, and a whore always remains her, although she changed her status to "political"
        5. +1
          16 October 2015 19: 58
          And what’s wrong, all rightly said, the victims were as a result of a foreign invasion by the Nazi junta on the territory of the DPR LPR.
      2. +32
        15 October 2015 15: 47
        "There are WOMEN in Swiss villages ..." (in contrast to this filth that danced on the bones of those killed in the Donbass)! "Respect and complete respect" Madame RICHARD-FAVR! So her, so well, straight face in what she crap, and also comes from Belarus!
        1. +12
          15 October 2015 18: 23
          Quote: kartalovkolya
          So her, so well, just a mug in the fact that she shit, and also hails from Belarus!

          She is Ukrainian, she just lives here ... She has citizenship ... recourse
          And it’s kind of like from Ivano-Frankivsk. Genes ... request
      3. +58
        15 October 2015 15: 50
        Look deeper colleagues, the Nobel Prize Institute over the past decade has completely declined itself. Look at WHOM and FOR WHAT it has been awarded in recent years ... This is especially true for peace awards, literary awards and awards for achievements in the field of economics. A decent person today is ashamed to receive it.
        1. +6
          15 October 2015 16: 21
          Quote: Vyacheslav 64
          Look deeper colleagues, the Nobel Prize Institute over the past decade has completely declined itself. Look at WHO and WHAT it has been awarded for in recent years ... This is especially true for peace awards

          just one abamka example
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. win
            +3
            15 October 2015 20: 35
            just one abamka example

            Somehow disrespectful to the Nobel laureate.
            Could be more polished - lamb...
            1. 0
              15 October 2015 22: 29
              and who is he in the party? foal or baby elephant?
        2. +9
          15 October 2015 18: 26
          This is especially true for peace awards, literary awards and awards for achievements in the field of economics.


          And in physics, chemistry, medicine the same thing. But here it is somewhat different, scientists have changed, or some time has come, the work is very small, if the sixties-seventies it was difficult to choose from the equilibrium fundamental works, in truth of discoveries, today they choose and pull from second-rate works that which is more attractive for invention. When the nominees are already outright fraudulent schemes for cutting scientific grants, for example, the "discovery" of the Higgs boson and graphene. The world goes into masturbation of opportunities to cut the dough, and everything else is just a means for this.
        3. +3
          15 October 2015 21: 13
          Mr. M.S. Gorbachev was not ashamed to receive an award for RSD and RMD .... Award from the United States ... as I understand it, a separate item .... Nobody is touching it now.
          1. +3
            15 October 2015 22: 32
            Quote: moroz656
            Mr. M.S. Gorbachev was not ashamed to receive an award for RSD and RMD .... Award from the United States ... as I understand it, a separate item .... Nobody is touching it now.

            This is his 30 silver coins for the betrayal of the motherland. That is hiding now in Germany, next to the Amer’s base. He is afraid that they will hang them on aspen houses. Tobaccos!
        4. +2
          15 October 2015 22: 28
          I completely agree! O.S.K.T.T.s.I.L.s.ya Nobel Committee, all prizes are awarded to some moral freaks! With rare exceptions ... Upfront Peace Prize, paper-makers for literature, Pseudo-economists - for work on the economy that the era of economic crises has passed, and after half a year the 2008 economic crisis has erupted, and many more can be listed ... Personally, I already It's a shame to see such great people like Shelokhov, Alferov in these lists. One gets the feeling that the winners are now selected exactly the opposite.
          1. 0
            15 October 2015 23: 00
            Sorry brother! Competitors must be crushed. When was the USSR there was still a counterweight. I had to reckon with my opponent. Today the masks are reset.
        5. 0
          15 October 2015 22: 57
          Vyacheslav 64! So decent people today probably do not give the Nobel. Business however! Although Nobel himself, frankly, is far from an angel. Though dynamite, even oil. Typical reptiloid.
        6. +3
          16 October 2015 04: 00
          Yes, they have reached such a level in physics, so to speak about political disciplines.
          By the way, when I was young she had a book called "The War Has No Woman's Face", and since I had never read anything like this before, it dramatically influenced my attitude towards women in the army. They let it out in Bulgarian and took it apart at school. Then we did not have them, I knew only one of my own distant relative, who with her future husband fought as a sniper in that war. Both were wounded, crippled already near Vienne, and I had a clear impression that women had no place there.
          And so I remembered the author, a good one. Then I didn’t read, of course, but she’ll take it and throw such a fortress ...
          In occasion of a typhoon. Pindotrolls were aroused of course, but being illiterate, they were crushed.
          Oh, well, when the aircraft woke up and earned ... :)
      4. +15
        15 October 2015 17: 12
        Quote: dr.Bo
        Well done, strong words !!!!

        And the meaning of words. "Foreign stove" turned out to be smarter and closer to us (in spirit and perception of the situation in Donbass) than "the daughter of the brotherly people" !!!
        1. -3
          16 October 2015 07: 46
          Come on.
          All over the world, sane people are sane. Not because they dream of sucking off a Russian. And I’ll tell you a terrible secret - it’s possible not only to understand the secret thoughts of Russians who are, like, inaccessible, just sensual, but they themselves think the same way. Because when they think, it turns out the same way. When they don’t think, it’s like Khuseinovich’s, but this is already a completed stage.
          Although, I wouldn’t be like a shit.
        2. 0
          16 October 2015 09: 48
          Another proof that the title of Man does not depend on nationality and place of residence! As well as "inhuman".
        3. The comment was deleted.
      5. +2
        15 October 2015 18: 35
        very strong! shaking hands Madame!
        1. 0
          15 October 2015 19: 22
          I have not read this Alexievich. But I would venture to suggest from the quotes in the media, it’s something like the fact that not all Germans were SS beasts, but just good "dudes" are also not uncommon among them. 5 years ago, it was in trend in Europe.
          1. +1
            16 October 2015 04: 04
            No, then she was honest.
            Only people change with age, and so is she.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      6. +2
        15 October 2015 22: 09
        Quote: dr.Bo
        "... Madam, in stating this, you are not just lying, you are not just delusional, you have disdained reality.

        Best regards, Helene RICHARD-FAVRE ""


        Well no.
        Just a lie. Paid lie.
      7. -1
        16 October 2015 02: 38
        Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here https://dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link Itself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really happened.
      8. 0
        16 October 2015 08: 48
        The Belarusian authorities want to return the creation of this very mod to the school curriculum. Most likely, "The war does not have a woman's face." To be honest, I haven't read it, but as Belarus I am proud of its Nobel Prize, although I would not even stand next to many laureates (including her).
        1. +1
          17 October 2015 22: 51
          She is the same Belarusian as I am. chairs fell. For frenzied Russophobia she was a Jewess, Jews gave this prize, as well as the "great" anti-Soviet liar, camp informer Isaich, both made of the same shit. that there is no stability in Belarus.
      9. 0
        16 October 2015 12: 05
        Quote: dr.Bo
        Well done, strong words !!!!

        And most importantly, they are true.
      10. +1
        17 October 2015 13: 23
        alexievich just! a conjuncturist and a populist! for "zinc boys" - I hate !!!!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +78
    15 October 2015 14: 52
    If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.
    1. +21
      15 October 2015 14: 58
      Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the detractor of the Russian Federation, in Judas they gave a solzhik his "creativity" is studied in schools! basically didn’t read Solzhik and I won’t!
      1. +19
        15 October 2015 15: 03
        Quote: ronin201
        Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the detractor of the Russian Federation, in Judas they gave a solzhik his "creativity" is studied in schools! basically didn’t read Solzhik and I won’t!

        Then, to show that even in the West they understand what lies are. And they do not discuss it, but show that not only do we see the truth. There are still decent people in the west.
        1. jjj
          +23
          15 October 2015 15: 32
          In this regard, Pasternak's refusal of the award begins to look like a kind of providence
      2. -77
        15 October 2015 15: 15
        And I thought that the workers and collective farmers who did not read Pasternak and Solzhenitsyn during the USSR, but condemned them in indignant letters, disappeared ...
        1. -88
          15 October 2015 15: 32
          And I thought that the workers and collective farmers who did not read Pasternak and Solzhenitsyn during the USSR, but condemned them in indignant letters, disappeared ...


          Unfortunately, grayness is very difficult to treat and does not depend on the system and politics, this is our scourge. And then we wonder why it happened in Ukraine.
          And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.
          1. +36
            15 October 2015 15: 45
            Quote: Didn't serve
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            A-ha! Fell under the table))) A man ischo about "dullness" writes here. Especially touches in the "documentary history" "40-50 million" innocently killed and thrown into the dungeon. In general, Isaich, of course, is a very authoritative source, especially when it stars about 100 million dead at the hands of the socialist regime. Mister Didn't serve - use the rezun! There you panravitsa! Well, or the official history of Ukraine.
            1. -27
              15 October 2015 16: 04
              Quote: Not served
              And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.
              A-ha! Fell under the table))) A man ischo about "dullness" writes here. Especially touches in the "documentary history" "40-50 million" innocently killed and thrown into the dungeon. In general, Isaich, of course, is a very authoritative source, especially when it stars about 100 million dead at the hands of the socialist regime. Mister Didn't serve - use the rezun! There you panravitsa! Well, or the official history of Ukraine.


              When people wake up gray - come to power brown

              Strugatsky brothers
              1. +10
                15 October 2015 16: 08
                Quote: Didn't serve
                When people wake up gray - come to power brown

                Og! That’s what I’m looking at, that you are already here, for anti-Sovietism = Russophobia = Nazism
                1. +2
                  15 October 2015 18: 49
                  Quote: Corporal Valera
                  Quote: Didn't serve
                  When people wake up gray - come to power brown

                  Og! That’s what I’m looking at, that you are already here, for anti-Sovietism = Russophobia = Nazism

                  Zhirinovsky-Russophobe? Well, you fucking give © Features national hunting
                  1. +1
                    15 October 2015 20: 09
                    Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
                    Zhirinovsky-Russophobe? Well, you fucking give © Features national hunting

                    Zhirinovsky is the same Russophobe as the liberal. He was not noticed in stubborn anti-Sovietism, except for clowning assaults on an old friend Zyuganov on a zombie man for populist purposes. Any other examples?
                  2. 0
                    16 October 2015 15: 08
                    The anti-adviser is always Russophobe (C)
              2. +5
                15 October 2015 17: 01
                If you haven’t served, don’t clog up the air, go to “yours”!
              3. +4
                16 October 2015 00: 00
                The Strugatsky brothers glorified communism with might and main ... under the communists.
                Then they glorified freedom from the Communists ... after the disappearance of the USSR.
                What are people called changing their principles easily and not for free?
                Aleksievich from among them.
                Their name is legion ...
                1. +4
                  16 October 2015 04: 33
                  Well, I’ll intercede for them.
                  Read their work separately, there are several sleeves. It went all the time.
                  They were building a possible future world, blaming them for something - akin to blaming Jules Verne for the damned nuclear submarines that would ruin the world. At that time, there was no stupid ideology as a phenomenon, from the point of view of the current Internet.
                  I am not obliged to believe me offhand, therefore I will recommend the book "The Worlds of the Strugatsky Brothers". It may even be zero, I don't remember. Surely there is in the internet, I only have a paper one, I will not give a link.
                  So you will fall into place.
              4. +1
                16 October 2015 04: 15
                Holy truth.
                Only the Strugatsky have a different context for this, is it not Undeserving?
                Che climbed, trollik? Maybe the local boys have their own NATO advisers. Don't be so cheap, general :)
              5. 0
                17 October 2015 13: 28
                you're one of them!
          2. -24
            15 October 2015 15: 54
            Let the minus be put. If only "Matrenin Dvor" could be read at their leisure ...
            1. +9
              15 October 2015 16: 03
              Epics are better! More reliable, anyway
            2. +8
              15 October 2015 16: 05
              And you read the new history of Ukraine, there is much more meaningful! I read "Matryonin's yard", read a couple of times, so what? Do you believe? :)))
            3. +1
              15 October 2015 17: 30
              Quote: Abbra
              Let the minus be put. If only "Matrenin Dvor" could be read at their leisure ...

              If only Alexander Zinov's "Flight of Our Youth" or "The Leader's Secret Project or Neo-Stalinism" by Georgy Sidorov could be read at their leisure ...
            4. +1
              15 October 2015 18: 01
              A little higher, I noted the story "Matrenin's yard" as one of the worthy examples of the literary genre.
              But other?
            5. +3
              15 October 2015 22: 26
              his early works are simply lovely but the archipelago and fifth wheel are simply unreadable for a man who has lived and has seen something in life.
          3. +43
            15 October 2015 16: 03
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.
            I don’t know my colleague, where you grew up, in which country, I don’t know who raised you, did the elders tell you about the real, not book history of the USSR. Everything has happened in the history of our country, but so much poison and hatred, like Solzhynitsyn’s, I haven’t heard about from the USSR from any of his peers. There were people among my teachers who were older than this scribbler, there were people who had served their sentences unrighteously, but no one misinterpreted the history and course of events.
            1. +1
              15 October 2015 16: 54
              Quote: Vyacheslav 64
              but as much poison and hatred as Solzhynitsyn’s didn’t I hear about the USSR from any of his peers. There were people among my teachers and older than this scribbler, there were people who had served their sentences unrighteously, but no one misinterpreted the history and course of events

              In general, Vadim Tumanov, whose share fell immeasurably more, rightly considered his imprisonment to be an easy out-of-town walk in his book "to lose everything and start again from a dream" never spat in his homeland. But even after his release, his life was not honey, despite the fact that he was considered the first Soviet millionaire and not a huckster and swindler Tarasov
            2. 0
              16 October 2015 14: 51
              Then Putin awarded him a state prize, established a literary prize in his name.
              And the whole country escorted him to another world.
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. +33
            15 October 2015 16: 21
            Yes, a very documentary story. I now live in the center of the former Ozerlag, which so classicly described this classic of pro-American democracy. And I’m still thinking where millions are buried, according to him, innocent lambs killed here. But in America and Europe it is more visible, because such a scale of lies can be estimated as a document only at large distances from the places of events.
            1. +9
              15 October 2015 16: 40
              Quote: asher
              But in America and Europe it is more visible, because such a scale of lies can be estimated as a document only at large distances from the places of events.

              I caught myself thinking that he had a surname SOLZHEnitsyn .. Apparently, his work and surname came together in life.
              1. +1
                15 October 2015 22: 39
                Mikado, so Solzhenitsyn can be translated as CREATE A FALSE, hence it can be called SOVRINITSYN!
            2. 0
              16 October 2015 05: 52
              The figure was simply "starred". At the right time, he butted, and then believed in his genius and suffered a darling. Lavra of Lev Nikolaevich did not give rest
          6. +6
            15 October 2015 16: 27
            It can’t be a documentary story by definition. It has a one-sided interpretation and lack of extensive archival references and data. According to the opinion poll in the prison, it was revealed that the whole country is sitting and all those sitting are not guilty .... And the question of not justice WHO WRITTEN DENOSIONS?
            1. +9
              15 October 2015 16: 40
              ... lack of extensive archival links and data ...

              Well what are you! Isaich gives a very "extensive" link: "according to the calculations of the emigrated professor of statistics IA Kurganov." Isaich had an indisputable authority, you know! Apparently, in the intervals between bouts of nostalgia and hard drinking, he made his own calculations. One gets the feeling that the Solzhenitsyn adherents themselves did not read, but they amicably approved
            2. +2
              15 October 2015 22: 44
              Quote: emercom1979
              According to the opinion poll in the prison, it was revealed that the whole country was sitting and all those sitting were not guilty .... And the question of not justice WHO WRITTEN DENOSIONS?

              Like who? You ask these lying liberals: Who wrote the denunciations? They answered you and us long ago. This is the quintessence of Universal Evil - Comrade Stalin Joseph Vissarionovich. He wrote denunciations himself, arrested him, judged himself, planted himself and shot himself ...
              1. +3
                16 October 2015 00: 38
                Quote: Flexsus
                He wrote denunciations himself, arrested him, judged himself, planted himself and shot himself ...

                Yeah! And, as everyone knows, if the blood of innocent victims is poured into railway tanks, then such a composition will go around the Earth! I personally saw this thesis on one forum with my own eyes. I had to prove a moron, with a calculator in my hands, that this is impossible in principle.
          7. +5
            15 October 2015 16: 35
            Did you yourself serve in the army?
            - Yes. Not. And what you need?
            “You are not.”
            - Thank.
            Election Day (film)

            And you better not say
          8. +10
            15 October 2015 16: 38
            Quote: Didn't serve
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            Come on !? Artistic-fantastic "work", which has collected rumors, speculation and outright lies, do you consider "documentary history" !?
          9. +13
            15 October 2015 17: 31
            - Stupidity!
            One could consider the works of Varlam Shalamov as such. He did not earn money for 30 pieces of silver, did not "knock" on his cellmates "godfather", like Solzhenitsyn. You can continue to count whatever you like, good, there is a calculator on every computer. It was not for nothing that Solzhenitsyn's cellmates gave the nickname Gnida, where a person is visible through and through, and the klikuha is a blow not to the eyebrow, but to the eye.
            And he had Vetrov's agent clicher, in all the denunciations he was so named.
          10. 0
            15 October 2015 17: 44
            Something I have doubts that after reading "AG", etc., you began to understand something, and certainly did not become more intelligent ... Yes, and probably read enough "superficially", only in order to in certain " close "circles Hordo declare-" I read, I'm in the subject "... something like this ...
          11. +9
            15 October 2015 18: 15
            And why then not a biography of Bear-Jap? Or dad Makhno?
            Solzhenitsyn ... How can you relate to a man who has betrayed his wife, who at the same time, being the wife of a political prisoner, has not abandoned her husband, but has endured everything ...
            Your idol married an American ...
            Well ... Who am I to judge you, for even Judas Iscariot had followers.
          12. The comment was deleted.
          13. +5
            15 October 2015 18: 20
            Quote: Didn't serve
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            HEY! Alexievich! Come to me! As a "colleague" I promise a place in the textbook. (Posthumously)
          14. +3
            15 October 2015 19: 34
            Quote: Didn't serve
            And I generally consider the Gulag Archipelago to be the documentary history of our country from 1917 to 1954.

            Yesterday on the site "Empire" there was a very good article about Solzhenitsker, his entire life path. Read carefully, then maybe karma, in the sense of rating, will not be violated.
          15. 0
            15 October 2015 22: 20
            pseudo-documentary more precisely there is a lot of fiction.
          16. 0
            17 October 2015 13: 27
            and when people are enlightened, blue come to power !!!!
          17. +1
            17 October 2015 23: 30
            Isaich is a liar and a falsifier. His entire official biography, like the so-called "creativity", is one continuous bundle of lies, starting with the so-called "conspiracy" against Stalin, which he himself invented in order to avoid the progressive and further, camp life -2,5 , XNUMX years out of seven, in the place of the camp informer under the pseudonym Vetrov, ending with "creativity", facts and figures invented or taken from the ceiling or events pulled out of context. All this bullshit was mixed with actual events, and passed off as the ultimate truth. People who do not know, or who are little versed in the historical events of those years, accepted all this "creativity" as our Father, not even realizing that they were being foolishly fooled, and they also receive prizes on this fooling. The same Varlam Shalamov, Isaich except he did not call it scum, and bequeathed that after his death "this liar and traitor would not even be able to touch my archive with a finger." So, you can continue to read the story from Isaich, "who does not live by lies," only noodles don't forget to shoot b.
          18. 0
            18 October 2015 07: 39
            Then I will present "the epoch-making documentary history of our country" from 1954 to our years. Applicant for 2016)))))
        2. +12
          15 October 2015 16: 17
          To write such nasty things under such a flag is not good. You, as they say, either remove the cross or put on your underpants. The fact of the matter is that they read semi-journalistic, but giving rise to feelings of admiration for Soviet people, books of this newly appeared Judas in a skirt. Moreover, the degeneration of a normal, seemingly journalist, into a vile Bandera scum looks ugly.
        3. -4
          15 October 2015 17: 52
          Oh, how much pathos, do not burst there from your well-read and important laughing For the same Pasternak, not everything is so unambiguous, although why analyze, it is better to shout like "the inhabitants of the country 404" - "Glory to the heroes!" a ... and at the same time jump (jump is required! otherwise "b")
        4. +5
          15 October 2015 18: 58
          Quote: Abbra
          And I thought that the workers and collective farmers who did not read Pasternak and Solzhenitsyn during the USSR, but condemned them in indignant letters, disappeared ...

          Sorry, not mine, but I totally agree.
          Igor Fedorovich Zelenkovsky - Publicist, member of the Union of Writers of Russia, head of the project "Western Russia".
          ***
          “I haven’t read it, but I condemn it” - this is a phrase said in relation to BL Pasternak when he was awarded the Nobel Prize, and which became winged in the USSR, belonged to someone from the USSR Writers' Union.

          And now the recent news - a Belarusian citizen, writing in Russian in the genre of journalistic investigations, was awarded the Nobel Prize already for literature. When I found out about this, the first flashed thought was that Aleksievich had the same relation to literature as Barack Obama had to "world peace."

          Then he felt sorry for the Belarusian schoolchildren who would be forced to read this nobeliar without the right to condemn. And for sure - the other day the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus informed that from next year Aleksievich will be included in the curriculum.
          Did I read Aleksievich myself? She flipped through her “Unclean face” many years ago, and put it off, because if “not necessary”, then I did not read about it. Then, thank God, it was "optional."

          The third thing that I have already smiled about is how Belarusian writers are now outraged, because the "movable" literature never shines to receive the Nobel. Simple arithmetic is in the third world, where at any moment a “color revolution” may be required, more than a hundred countries, and the next time the turn will reach Belarus only after a hundred years with a hook. Will anyone be awarded then? Perhaps the “creative supolas” will calm down if Alekseevich learns “mov” and fulfills the old wish to the “letters” from the president of Belarus by writing something equal to Tolstoy or Sholokhov, for example, “Tsikhi Neman” or “Vine and Light”. But in her years to learn "mov"?

          But seriously, from this pro-Western Russophobic lady Belarusians are sculpted with unquestioned authority in the last resort. Alas, the Nobel Prize still works as a letter of protection, and the social status of Nobiliar rises above the presidential one. And ahead of the parliamentary elections, which the West requires to be held according to its rules. For Aleksievich, a role about the same as that of Sakharov in the destruction of the USSR was programmed in Belarus. So Belarusians, having said thanks for such a “present”, need to think hard ....
        5. The comment was deleted.
        6. +5
          15 October 2015 22: 30
          Abbra. I read these bastards even when their "works" only appeared in Samizdat. And I always condemned these bastards, Pasternak, Solzhenitsyn, as well as the late Sakharov, Khrushchev and others on the list who poured the slop on the USSR! So we have not disappeared, and we will continue to brand these bastards.
          1. 0
            16 October 2015 00: 15
            Thank you!
        7. +3
          16 October 2015 09: 30
          Why, how)) Read)))) Another year in 1990. Vyderdy like zinc boys with the idea that why the hell do you need a homeland, if you need to fight for it? Ah, my son was seriously wounded, let's give the Wahhabis Russia. But we will be safe ... and tsetera .... All her work in this vein. A mixture of Rezun and Akhedzhakova.
        8. 0
          16 October 2015 09: 57
          And here they are not outraged by her work, but by her lie in real life. If an individual behaves disgustingly, who cares about her professional achievements? Just like her personal life or, there, culinary tastes. She lies, and for this she received a slap in the letter and the indignation of normal people. Let him come to Donetsk, get out on the podium and repeat his lie there. Will they believe her in the Donbass? And what will they answer?
        9. The comment was deleted.
        10. 0
          17 October 2015 13: 25
          You READ Solzhenitsyn ???
      3. +35
        15 October 2015 15: 25
        Quote: ronin201
        Why discuss it at all

        Then, that the Nobel no longer exists. It became corrupt, like politics.
        1. +10
          15 October 2015 17: 37
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Then, that the Nobel no longer exists. It became corrupt, like politics

          Now this award is an indicator of venality to the enemies of the Russian world. The mark is on the forehead.
        2. +2
          15 October 2015 17: 56
          Well, they discredited her, ShNobilevka, even when Husseinich was advanced. Finally and irrevocably!
          1. +2
            15 October 2015 22: 53
            Taram taramych, and that Humpback is better than Huseynich, he also received the Nobel Prize, but okay, I don’t feel sorry for what I received, it’s a pity that it’s not due to snobber and a heavy fist!
      4. +6
        15 October 2015 15: 31
        I support you in this for all 100, I also think that there is nothing like this in Solzhik that our rotten intelligentsia so elevates him. Let the Americans study it and not our children
      5. -24
        15 October 2015 15: 43
        Quote: ronin201
        Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the detractor of the Russian Federation, in Judas they gave a solzhik his "creativity" is studied in schools! basically didn’t read Solzhik and I won’t!

        Reading the works of smart people is necessary without looking at your subjective attitude towards them. You look and become smarter yourself.
        1. +9
          15 October 2015 16: 56
          Quote: kizhe
          Reading the works of smart people is necessary without looking at your subjective attitude towards them.

          Of course it is necessary. With the interest of an entomologist. The word “smart” is not synonymous with the word “honest”. And with a fig, a negative opinion about Solzhenitsyn is “subjective”!? Maybe the opposite is OBJECTIVE.
          Quote: kizhe
          You look and become smarter yourself.

          But this is rudeness, a citizen is a fan of Solzhenitsyn.
        2. +2
          15 October 2015 17: 07
          You, too, "Didn't serve"?
        3. +4
          15 October 2015 18: 40
          Quote: kizhe
          . You look and become smarter yourself.

          This does not apply to you!
        4. 0
          15 October 2015 23: 42
          To link these two things-http: //cont.ws/post/97916 and http://agitpro.su/kiev-otvel-5-let-na-okonchatelnuyu-promyvku-mozgov/ you don't have to be very smart. nation 6leat.Akunin, Erofeev, Aleksevich we come closer to the wall. There is enough space for everyone. The most disgusting thing is that the witnesses and contemporaries of the Gulag also died and there is no one now to refute the facts of the “works” of the Judaic, which means that the pernicious influence of his works on not strong young minds will increase Of course, if you do not take countermeasures, at least carefully check what and who writes in school history textbooks, not forgetting higher education.
        5. 0
          16 October 2015 10: 08
          Hitler cannot really be called stupid. Tell me, do I have the right to condemn Hitler, although I haven't read Mein Kampf? And I also consider his landscapes, although not masterpieces, but rather pleasant?
          1. +1
            16 October 2015 14: 02
            Quote: housewife
            Hitler cannot really be called stupid. Tell me, do I have the right to condemn Hitler, although I haven't read Mein Kampf? And I also consider his landscapes, although not masterpieces, but rather pleasant?

            ... Yes, a good artist could have turned out of him ... if he had not climbed into the Fuhrer!
            And he was also at the front - in the 1st MV - as a soldier (corporal) was awarded some kind of medal, an analogue "for courage"; and the Germans are neat people, they don’t give out medals for free to soldiers! ... He could have had a great and glorious future - a family, children, the glory of a great artist and war hero ... formula! ...
      6. +3
        15 October 2015 16: 20
        I recommend reading it. It is indicative of how a person who received a well-deserved punishment tries to rehabilitate with the innocent, citing them as an example and at the same time denigrating the authorities and the system. In short, from the category, all around are to blame, but I'm done.
        1. +1
          16 October 2015 10: 15
          People appreciated his work .... Posthumously
      7. +6
        15 October 2015 17: 58
        I read Solzhenitsyn from cover to cover.
        The first reading was "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich", published in Novy Mir in the 60s, and read in the early 70s. The impression was disgusting, especially since at that time I was serving in the army.
        In the nineties, he acquired a complete collection of works for a penny (naturally, without the latest journalism, when he "regained his sight").
        I read almost everything, the only thing is that I did not master The Gulag Archipelago, which is actually difficult to imagine as a novel. There is a continuous balancing act of names, dates, numbers, etc., which in themselves cause certain doubts. Indeed, who provided him with the archival secret information to which he refers?
        Well, about the "sharashka". From the very first pages, so casually, an inconspicuous lie.
        Implicit, believable in appearance ... but a lie.
        At school, as far as I know, his story "Matrenin's Dvor" is held and this is the only literary work worth reading.
        1. +2
          16 October 2015 11: 42
          I worked in this sharashka, and talked with people who caught Solzhenitsyn, and so his whole great contribution was the issuance of logarithmic rulers and a partial verification of the calculations of others with her help, incl. his position was the lowest ...
      8. +2
        15 October 2015 22: 37
        Quote: ronin201
        in Judah, Solzhik was also given his "creativity" to be studied in schools! basically didn’t read Solzhik and I won’t!

        And I specifically revered this Jew. Now I show to his admirers the words of this para ... that he keeps all his readers for suckers and idiots. The enemy must be known in person. You know his paperwork means armed.
    2. +4
      15 October 2015 14: 59
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.
      "Grandmothers" rule the world ... Who pays, the "girl" dances.
    3. +1
      15 October 2015 15: 00
      This doesn’t even mean anything.
    4. +24
      15 October 2015 15: 03
      But what is strange ... it turns out that the Swiss writer is much more adequate notice BELARUSIAN !!!!! request
      1. +37
        15 October 2015 15: 17
        E ...... In it, the Belarusian is only a temporary residence.
        Even before she received the Nobel Prize, he was briefly interested in her work,
        But after the "zinc boys" this madam was nauseous.
        Everywhere there are "white crows", they have their own perception of the world and this is normal. This madam is not a white crow, she lives outside reality, she is a matryoshka doll, and a matryoshka with a perverted logic! It will swing where it hurts, turn everything around, spoil it and pass it off as the pure truth.
        Figuratively, If you throw a small piece of shit on a fan - the aroma is provided throughout the house. So Aleksievich ... He will find a small piece of shit, add his mighty pile to it and throw it on the fan!
        To her for sure, without Respect!
        1. +1
          15 October 2015 18: 02
          "Novodvorskaya", (not to be remembered for the night), only Belorussky spill.
          1. +5
            15 October 2015 18: 57
            Quote: taram taramych
            "Novodvorskaya", (not to be remembered for the night), only Belorussky spill.

            Enough of blaming normal people! Russia, for example, has Gorbachev and Alekseeva, but we are not the accused of the whole of Russia for the fact that these ur ours are our compatriots
          2. +3
            15 October 2015 23: 04
            Taram Taranich, this Alekseeva is not of the Belarusian spill, but of Zapvlny, this is a representative of 5 columns!
    5. +1
      15 October 2015 15: 10
      Quote: kimanas
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.

      and with ..... ki always showed up at the time of testing, the time will come and she will dump these grandmothers for the cordon and very quickly.
    6. +8
      15 October 2015 15: 16
      kimanas
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.

      She is now supposed to say so ... after all, this award is an advance payment and a launching platform for the new role of this madam - the IMAGE OF THE "BELARUSIAN" GAVEL ... THE IMAGE OF A FUTURE APPLICANT FOR THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF BELARISSIA!
      Disappointed in various human rights defenders, the Americans DECIDED TO STOP THEIR CHOICE ON THE NEW INTELLIGENCE ... Now they will begin to promote her person. Just to live a little more enta laureates in Belarus itself ... and then for the last 25 years of living in Zap. Europe and the Belarusian language forgot ...
      And the only thing left for her was a Belarusian spelling ....
      1. +12
        15 October 2015 17: 45
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        Disappointed in various human rights defenders, the Americans DECIDED TO STOP THEIR CHOICE AT A NEW INTELLIGENCE ...


        The intelligentsia is a layer between the people and the nobility, devoid of the good taste inherent in the people. - Vyacheslav Pleve

        Try to ask our intellectuals questions: what is war, patriotism, the army, military specialty, military valor? Ninety out of a hundred will answer you: war is a crime, patriotism is a relic of antiquity, the army is the main brake on progress, the military specialty is a shameful craft, military valor is a manifestation of stupidity and atrocity ... - Evgeny Martynov

        I don’t believe in our intelligentsia, hypocritical, false, hysterical, ill-bred, lying, I don’t believe even when she suffers and complains, because her oppressors come out of her bowels ... - Anton Chekhov

        The despotism of an intelligent and therefore privileged minority, as if it is better to understand the real interests of the people than the people themselves, is especially terrible. Firstly, representatives of this minority will try at all costs to lay the lives of future generations in the Procrustean bed of their ideal. Secondly, these twenty or thirty intellectual scientists will bite among themselves ... - Mikhail Bakunin
        1. +3
          15 October 2015 18: 16
          Thank you, Svetlana!
          You have forgotten Dostoevsky and Chernyshevsky — their assessment of the "Russian intelligentsia" is similar.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            16 October 2015 10: 13
            That is, Dostoevsky and Chernyshevsky themselves are not the intelligentsia? And then who? Or were they of the same opinion about themselves?
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          15 October 2015 23: 07
          Absolutely agree with you Svetlana !!!
    7. +17
      15 October 2015 15: 33
      Quote: kimanas
      If Alexeyevich thought and spoke differently, she would not have received the Nobel Prize.

      The whole world saw the price of the Nobel Prize when it was received by Humpback and Obama. And so on the literature! Of course, there are many worthy writers there. But Aleksievich is still from the company of Solzhenitsyn and Churchill. Pure policy. If I was in music, they would give Makarevich ... negative And Chapek, by the way, was not given a prize for criticizing the Nazi government of Germany ... So, those who criticize today's Ukraine and the USA cannot see the prize.
  4. +6
    15 October 2015 14: 55
    These diploma winners of various awards for literature and cinema have one theme - to smear thicker dirt on Russia and call it "the fight against lies" ... If a writer or director in the post-Soviet space was given a prize or award, then there is no doubt that first-class muck has been done. ..
  5. +5
    15 October 2015 14: 56
    Such a prize was ruined.
    1. +7
      15 October 2015 14: 59
      It all started with a peace prize to ram Obama?
      1. +2
        15 October 2015 16: 24
        And not from Hitler by accident?
    2. +8
      15 October 2015 15: 33
      Quote: katalonec2014
      Such a prize was ruined.

      ------------------
      It has always been presented as exactly Russophobic or anti-Soviet art, almost always ...
  6. +2
    15 October 2015 14: 57
    Late! This bucket of loot has already received and became popular ...
    1. +6
      15 October 2015 15: 30
      She stood on a par with a teddy bear marked with a black obama and such jackals zapadentsy love ...
  7. +2
    15 October 2015 14: 57
    - Su-24M bombers in the area of ​​the village of Qusayr al-Ward, Aleppo province, hit the command post of ISIS fighters, equipped in one of the two-story buildings. A direct hit by an aerial bomb destroyed the object, ”Konashenkov said.

    In addition, in the suburb of the village of El Atareb, Idlib province, Su-25 attack aircraft hit an underground workshop, which produced high-explosive mines for subsequent laying on highways in the area, TASS reports.

    Konashenkov also noted that a masked base had been identified by means of aerial reconnaissance in the Magar mountain range, Damascus province. At this facility there were three armored vehicles and eight off-road vehicles with heavy machine guns and mortars installed.

    “A couple of Russian Su-25 attack aircraft launched a fire attack on this base, which destroyed the equipment located at the facility, as well as fuel and ammunition supplies,” he noted.
    1. +2
      15 October 2015 15: 01
      Quote: Pogran
      - Su-24M bombers near the village of Qusayr al-Ward, Aleppo province, hit the command post of ISIS fighters,


      Troll patriot? original ...
    2. +1
      15 October 2015 15: 02
      Helen RICHAR-FAVR
      I don’t know, I didn’t read it, but if I write normal, I can give her some sort of our bonus. We probably have some sort of literature prize.
      1. +6
        15 October 2015 15: 58
        Yes, she does not need bonuses! She is happy that she lives in harmony with her conscience. She will not have to repent, she will not be haunted by the grief and despair of those people who burned in Odessa ... unlike this woman
      2. +11
        15 October 2015 16: 05
        Modern Swiss writer. By education - a linguist; She taught French and did research at the University of Geneva.
        Her first collection of short stories "Stories about no one" was published by URSS in 2004 (bilingual French-Russian; 2nd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2010). The book immediately attracted the attention of readers and literary critics, who noted the originality of the plots and the brilliant stylistic innovations of the author.
        Among her "teachers" Helen Richard-Favre names, first of all, Dostoevsky; the works of such Russian writers as Tolstoy, Chekhov and Pasternak had a significant impact on her literary work.

        Helene Richard-Favre speaks Russian well and often visits Russia. In one of her interviews, she admitted: “Honestly, only when I saw the Russian translation of my book did I fully feel like a writer.”
        Congratulations to the Swiss writer Helen Richard-Favre with the third prize in the international competition “Reading Petersburg 2013: Choosing the Best Foreign Writer” in the nomination “Best Foreign Writer, whose works are published in Russian translation”!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  8. +4
    15 October 2015 15: 00
    Consonant with Makarevich ... or just coincided?
    1. +8
      15 October 2015 15: 21
      It did not coincide, the twins from one cesspool.
      1. +1
        15 October 2015 19: 05
        Quote: combat66
        It did not coincide, the twins from one cesspool.

        From the same r'oda (no offense to all normal Jews), as Waltzman and Berezovsky
  9. +3
    15 October 2015 15: 02
    You should not have Helene Favre, at the end you attributed this respect to the breeches!
  10. +25
    15 October 2015 15: 04
    Everything you need to know about Aleksievich and her attitude to the USSR, Russia and Russians can be understood if you know who reads it:
    K. Borovoy, a longtime friend of the hiknuvska Novodvorskaya said: - "Lerochka (Novodvorskaya) always enjoyed rereading the magnificent works of Svetlana Aleksievich, full of truth and grief."
    I think that with this character everything is clear and questions should not arise.
    1. +3
      15 October 2015 15: 09
      Why, as the saying goes: "... there are some freaks in the family ..." Unfortunately, there are a lot of such freaks in our family ... I will not list their names, once again PR.
  11. +9
    15 October 2015 15: 04
    Smart Woman, put a fool in her place. There are people in Europe.
    1. +14
      15 October 2015 15: 07
      Quote: asiat_61
      put the fool in place

      It is very difficult to "put in place" a person without conscience, alas. recourse
      1. +1
        15 October 2015 15: 10
        Read her statements about Russia and Russians on the Izborsk Club.
    2. +1
      15 October 2015 16: 25
      Why a fool? Smart bastards full. If a person is a traitor or just an enemy, then this does not mean that he is. request
      1. 0
        16 October 2015 10: 18
        he is not in the mental sense, but in the sense - "in life." Diagnosis: no mental abnormalities were identified, just d-u-r-a-k. By the way, the word is quite literary, but it is not passed over.
  12. 3vs
    +2
    15 October 2015 15: 04
    Something the news on the Military Review is several days late.
  13. 0
    15 October 2015 15: 12
    The signature is too annoying ... "Best regards, Hélène RICHARD-FAVRE "
    1. +3
      15 October 2015 15: 19
      This call is hardcoded into the Normal.dot template (a WORD text editor), which is used by the Swiss writer Helene Richard-Favre when writing letters.
    2. +1
      15 October 2015 18: 13
      They all reached the signature. The letter is open.
      Quote: Byordovvv1
      "Best regards, Hélène RICHARD-FAVRE"
      , addressed to readers. The attitude to the grief writer is stated in the text of the letter.
  14. +2
    15 October 2015 15: 14
    But Madame Aleksievich needs to work out a grand, how not to call her a prize, very outstanding ..
  15. 0
    15 October 2015 15: 14
    “This is an occupation, this is a foreign invasion,” said Aleksiyevich.

    As for the occupation, in a sense she is right, the truth is not at all in the sense that she means it. Every revolution, with foreign support, is a form of occupation. I think it's hard to argue.
  16. +1
    15 October 2015 15: 14
    Quote: 3vs
    Something the news on the Military Review is several days late.

    Censorship)))
  17. +3
    15 October 2015 15: 18
    This Madame people writes in the same way as Solzhenitsyn. This genius made advances stock and then the point. He did not write anything worthwhile, for that yell was to heaven, a genius damn it. And this liberal cat also does not write anything worthwhile. What they say from Fashington is what he writes. Their Judas right now the sea.
  18. +1
    15 October 2015 15: 22
    Madame Aleksievich Nobel Prize, and Mr. D. Medvedev Order of Merit for the Fatherland. What is there to be surprised at?
    1. 0
      15 October 2015 18: 53
      Quote: karal
      Mr. D. Medvedev Order of Merit to the Fatherland.

      He did not need to be given an order, but a one-way ticket no closer than 100 kilometers from the Government. And without the right to return! It is interesting to know what kind of services he has to the Fatherland, if after his "reign" EVERYTHING he invented either has to be altered or returned to normal! And then why did he "deserve" this?
      1. +1
        16 October 2015 08: 59
        Not closer than 100 km from the state border of Russia. From the outside.
  19. +1
    15 October 2015 15: 24
    Dizziness from own significance and imaginary infallibility, multiplied by Nobel laurels ... Why is it so covered after the bonus that they begin to believe that they grabbed the Lord God by the beard ?!
  20. +2
    15 October 2015 15: 34
    Quote: ronin201
    Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the detractor of the Russian Federation, in Judas they gave a solzhik his "creativity" is studied in schools! basically didn’t read Solzhik and I won’t!

    What is "Solzhik" or at least in what language is it?
    1. +1
      15 October 2015 15: 45
      dismissive "Solzhenitsyn". as I understand it.)
    2. 0
      15 October 2015 15: 54
      Quote: alexbg2
      Quote: ronin201
      Why discuss it at all? Well, they gave a prize to the detractor of the Russian Federation, in Judas they gave a solzhik his "creativity" is studied in schools! basically didn’t read Solzhik and I won’t!

      What is "Solzhik" or at least in what language is it?

      Read above
    3. +5
      15 October 2015 15: 58
      The man who lied to the whole world wink
    4. 0
      15 October 2015 16: 01
      Such a writer was Solzhenitsyn ... turned history a bit like that ... gulag archipelago
      1. +4
        15 October 2015 16: 33
        Stalin turned history over. And this one was wrong. But it's not just about him. In the end, the Gulag Archipelago is a work of art, and the author can lie as he wants. Tolkien also wrote books. Nobody says that he is a liar. But the fact that this author and the admirers of his "talent" - or maybe just detractors of their country present these horror films as a history textbook - is absolutely unacceptable!
  21. +1
    15 October 2015 15: 41
    as we can see, it’s very easy to verify a person with Patriotism and the Brotherhood. It’s not in vain that there is a saying among the people ... if you want to know a person, then give him a briefcase with money ...
  22. 0
    15 October 2015 15: 41
    Article about a decent person ....
  23. +3
    15 October 2015 15: 45
    The war against RUSSIA has never ceased in the last 500 years, and for the last 70 years it has only fallen asleep and only a fool can talk about some polar worlds, there is a confrontation and you need to show your teeth in it if you do not want to be eaten.
    1. -2
      15 October 2015 17: 57
      Quote: Andryukha G
      The war against RUSSIA has never stopped in the last 500 years, and for the last 70 years it has only sunk ...

      According to my immodest data, a little more, 1000 years for sure, and if you take into account archeology, it comes out more than 3 years to a minimum.
    2. +2
      16 October 2015 10: 24
      "you do not want to be eaten" is equal to "you want to be eaten." It is necessary to be more careful with particles, they can turn the whole text over.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  24. +4
    15 October 2015 15: 50
    This "laureate" is another Russophobic lying bitch like Solzhenitsinin and K.
    1. 0
      15 October 2015 16: 05
      It’s more difficult to say. It's a pity you can’t put more pluses. And not everyone reads komenty to the bottom. good
  25. +3
    15 October 2015 15: 53
    Granny, this shame, unfortunately another, is for Belarus. where do they all come from !? Among my many friends, acquaintances, colleagues, etc., I have not met anyone who would sympathize with the Ukrainian government or at least be sympathetic to its actions. about all sorts of Russophobia and other misanthropes, I learn exclusively in the net. skillfully masked bastards?
  26. +3
    15 October 2015 15: 55
    Is there an answer ???? And will not be. And the writer, laureate from Belarus, was a bugbear and drin who will be able to hunt Lukashenko and build an anti-Russian Belarus. You will see.
  27. +8
    15 October 2015 16: 01
    It turns out that not everyone was frostbitten in the West, there are those who spit in the face of a corrupt twwa ... and maybe.
  28. +5
    15 October 2015 16: 02
    The West just does not give Nobel Prizes for peace and literature. These prizes are given to those who do not have a very important human quality - conscience.
    I will not say that it has always been so. But now it is just that.
    I wanted something to find their writings and read this writer Alekseevich. Now I won’t. I don’t see the point!
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. +2
    15 October 2015 16: 08
    It is necessary that this madam scribbler, Lukashenko sent for correctional labor. Labor for the benefit of society ennobles. In general, to her pig farm. smile
  31. +3
    15 October 2015 16: 14
    The article is not about the Nobel Prize and what it is. sold or not, and not great Russian authors, Sholokhov, Solzhenitsyn and other laureates, many of whom were expelled from the country and tearfully (after years) asked to return. Dostoevsky's example is like a star on the Moscow Kremlin. An article about the reaction of a living woman, free-thinking and sympathetic to the grief (immeasurable by 100% of the authors of local comments) of the people, the Russian people in Donbas. Honor and praise her. I wish all the "couch generals" wrote such a letter, everyone, maybe then a person (who calls himself an author), a Nobel laureate, will become thoughtful and will not be able to follow. just blatantly lie about 86%.
    1. +9
      15 October 2015 16: 35
      Do you think the "couch generals" did not write to her? She was even brought to trial in Belarus for the "Zink Boys".
      There is a very short phrase about which all arguments are broken - "And Che ..?" The pompous Aleksievich will answer you with many arguments, the result will be the same "So what ?!".
      She is an enemy, an enemy of both Russian and Belarusian. What do you think, to whom and for what have they recently been awarded the Nobel?
  32. +5
    15 October 2015 16: 36
    The nerves of iron in this Swiss writer. I couldn’t write like that. I would have a solid mat! am
  33. -14
    15 October 2015 16: 41
    Oh my God ... Yes, as much as you can! For you, dear, Syria did. Discuss her. When will this idiocy end? ..
    1. +1
      15 October 2015 16: 57
      Quote: sania1304
      Oh my God ... Yes, as much as you can! For you, dear, Syria did. Discuss her. When will this idiocy end? ..


      Who are you to her?
      1. -13
        15 October 2015 17: 10
        nobody. However, the statements from the series "Here the Nazis raped and shot everyone, and our brave guys in Germany shot only one cow, and that because she was mad" were already fed up. Be realistic. But this is to another topic ...
    2. +1
      16 October 2015 03: 19
      as much as necessary, because this topic affects me personally ... but we will take your point of view into account :)

      I almost forgot, people created Syria, the peoples living there in order to raise children, to live to love and build. and not for fun to anyone.
  34. +7
    15 October 2015 16: 55
    Quote: sania1304
    Oh my God ... Yes, as much as you can! For you, dear, Syria did. Discuss her. When will this idiocy end?

    without snotty we'll figure out what we should discuss ...
    1. -12
      15 October 2015 17: 06
      the fact that Danbas is the result of an internal conflict, without the participation of Russia, is only snotty and can discuss. And do not be rude. Respected.
      1. +8
        15 October 2015 17: 51
        Quote: sania1304
        what is Danbas ....


        Everything immediately became clear who you are and where ...

        Even the Swiss writer Helene RICHARD-FAVR knows how to spell the word "Donbass"

        This, like many other similar cases of killings and destruction in the Donbass


        So keep your "tips" with you. We ourselves will figure out what to discuss and what not.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +4
        15 October 2015 18: 52
        That's about Donbass, Alexander, you don’t need to say that. What
        to understand something about what is happening there, you need to feel with your own skin all the animal hatred of the "nezalezhnaya" to its inhabitants, to be bombed and shelled by Ukrainian brothers, to collect parts of the remains of your relatives and friends for burial, and then just talk
        about whether it is an internal conflict, or "aggression" of Russia.
        You never understand this, you don’t have a homeland, you only have a place to live, which YOU most likely also hate, as well as the country you live in. The tragedy of your family is not unique, it is similar to mine, like millions other families. But carrying so many generations of anger and hatred is the last thing. Can it be rethought, understand something, forgive something, obey something, and it becomes easier and brighter on the soul?
      4. +1
        15 October 2015 18: 55
        But it’s not fair to say that Russia is to blame for everything. We will not deny that the United States and the EU are not implicated and even more so than Russia, because they were at the origins of the so-called popular movement (Maidan). Causes and consequences.
  35. +1
    15 October 2015 16: 58
    She received the Nobel Prize for her lie. Therefore, she will lie further, only even cooler.
  36. +1
    15 October 2015 17: 27
    This is a business, nothing personal. She earned. As Obama is a laureate. It’s funny.
  37. 0
    15 October 2015 17: 34
    Nobel prizes are given not anyhow to anyone, but to trusted people. Like this laureate.
  38. +3
    15 October 2015 17: 36
    it seems to me that the Nobel Committee should abolish the distribution of prizes in the fields of literature, economics and the struggle for peace. he’s not free and engaged on these issues, shame on you, nob-komovtsy guys, distributing their prizes to anyone, but rather someone ordered, to discredit, in principle, a good idea. look, twenty years later, when you pose the question, only the tramp and lumpen will have to award it, decent people will not go after her.
  39. +5
    15 October 2015 17: 43
    Strictly speaking, even the book "The War Does Not Have a Woman's Face", published in the USSR, already had very biased facts, in the spirit of mild anti-Sovietism and anti-Stalinism. To speak openly then, this ally Akhedzhakova and Makarevich, did not dare. - In the USSR, for this they could be sent as Bukovsky, or put, as Novodvorskaya, in a prison-type psychiatric hospital. By the way, I met the latter personally, more than once I had the opportunity to observe and talk to her. So, obsessive thoughts haunted her constantly. And it was visible. Shkonka Novodvorskaya is free and Alexievich is targeting her today. We wish her dream to come true.
  40. +2
    15 October 2015 17: 52
    Nah yes, pretend. Here are 86, not 85 and not 90, namely 86.
    Ms. Svetlana Aleksievich, you should be careful, otherwise you can easily break the point by 86%.

    Threat. who is too lazy to look to send a mat here:
    "Galina Dursthoff Literary Agency"
    http://www.dursthoff.de
    Email: [email protected]
  41. +2
    15 October 2015 18: 06
    Quote: OlegLex
    We are Russian and differ from the cursed Anglo-Saxons in that, unlike them, we have a very developed sense of justice, so why are you surprised? !! The Nobel Prize has long become a political tool, doesn’t you have anything to say about the Obama Peace Prize in the 2008 year, they just elected him a preserve ... (oops) as president, he was already declared a peacemaker and awarded, or the previous literature prize was handed to a Chinese writer a dissident, not for writing better than the classics, but for being a dissident.
    So something like this. and about justice, so if it will triumph, it is only here in Russia. because only Russians are capable of dying not only for the idea but also for justice.

    golden words
  42. +6
    15 October 2015 18: 16
    "the Belarusian writer said that in Russia" 86% of people were happy "to kill people in Donetsk."
    That's why she received the Nobel Prize. For the heinous lie about Russia.
  43. +2
    15 October 2015 18: 20
    Quote: Svetlana
    Quote: KazaK Bo
    Disappointed in various human rights defenders, the Americans DECIDED TO STOP THEIR CHOICE AT A NEW INTELLIGENCE ...


    The intelligentsia is a layer between the people and the nobility, devoid of the good taste inherent in the people. - Vyacheslav Pleve

    Try to ask our intellectuals questions: what is war, patriotism, the army, military specialty, military valor? Ninety out of a hundred will answer you: war is a crime, patriotism is a relic of antiquity, the army is the main brake on progress, the military specialty is a shameful craft, military valor is a manifestation of stupidity and atrocity ... - Evgeny Martynov

    I don’t believe in our intelligentsia, hypocritical, false, hysterical, ill-bred, lying, I don’t believe even when she suffers and complains, because her oppressors come out of her bowels ... - Anton Chekhov

    The despotism of an intelligent and therefore privileged minority, as if it is better to understand the real interests of the people than the people themselves, is especially terrible. Firstly, representatives of this minority will try at all costs to lay the lives of future generations in the Procrustean bed of their ideal. Secondly, these twenty or thirty intellectual scientists will bite among themselves ... - Mikhail Bakunin
    and after: I would like to know, and with whom did the cited authors identify?
  44. +2
    15 October 2015 18: 26
    How can a liar be respected? Not a mistaken one, namely a liar who perfectly understands what he is saying and what he is saying either for money or for money!
    1. +3
      15 October 2015 18: 56
      Quote: cat
      How can a liar be respected? Not a mistaken one, namely a liar who perfectly understands what he is saying and what he is saying either for money or for money!

      No, well, like Western civilization, who prevents it from dumping and living there. No, he doesn’t leave, because no one needs her there. There, apparently, she will not be able to offer the West anything but herself. And here, and here you can sell the homeland.
      She is not just a liar; one must call a spade a spade. She is a traitor.
  45. -5
    15 October 2015 18: 54
    There you have the brotherly people. angry How to deal with such is not clear. Listen. what such brothers and sisters say is not possible at all.
    1. +4
      15 October 2015 20: 22
      You PEOPLE with one separately licked poop do not confuse, please!
    2. +2
      16 October 2015 12: 12
      You are an aunt born in Ivano-Frankivsk, the heart of Banderostan, just because of the presence of her Belarusian passport, do not ascribe to the fraternal people. She is a sister to galloping maydauns
  46. +2
    15 October 2015 19: 11
    Quote: cat
    How can a liar be respected? Not a mistaken one, namely a liar who perfectly understands what he is saying and what he is saying either for money or for money!


    Alekseevich-Enemy. Explicit, distinct, unequivocal Enemy of our Country.
  47. +6
    15 October 2015 19: 25
    Lying is her job. You can write at least 100500 letters, but this creature will continue to crap.
    Although I am not a supporter of such methods, but a life-giving ice ax would obviously benefit this "Alekseevich" ...
  48. +8
    15 October 2015 19: 29
    Solzhenitsyn is one of the criminals who destroyed the USSR. He deflected from the front and realized that it is better to criticize the Soviet system and sit in the zone than to go under bullets. I did not find anything literary in his opuses. And this scum at one time tried to discredit Sholokhov. And this not a writer, this representative of the ideological front directed against Russia and Belarus.
    1. +1
      15 October 2015 21: 07
      Fortunately, Solzhenitsyn’s retribution nevertheless overtook!
      At the end of his life, this lackey of the West and Judah, his comrades-in-arms poked their faces on the table, told them not to rock the boat and shut up, and sent them to the dacha, to life imprisonment, where he died.
  49. +7
    15 October 2015 19: 35
    And what great thing did she write? What great did Solzhenitsin write? Or Pasternak? Of all the Nobel laureates in literature from our country, only Sholokhov is truly honored. So he really wrote the truth and did not lick the west. And the rest were given a Nobel Prize only for the fact that they poured dirt on their country. Well, now we all know the true value of "Western values" and the price of such Aleksievichs. Every day we see Nadezhdin, Gozman and others like them on the TV screen, who are only busy throwing mud at the country in which they live. And now everyone understands that they do it for a reason, but for a green amersky ruble. Alekseeva has been slandering the country all her life, but she does not go to the USA because she is not needed there, she has to shit here, for this she is paid. Do not worry in two months, no one will remember this Aleksievich, because in itself it is not interesting to anyone. And the country on which she spits was and will be great for centuries.
  50. +3
    15 October 2015 20: 13
    Now, probably one of the prerequisites to teach the Nobel is to be slandered at the direction of someone.
    1. +3
      15 October 2015 23: 27
      "Nun is not slandering anyone, but" Rushu "." If I walk through the streets of Donetsk in a T-shirt with the image of the President of the Neighboring Country, it's normal. If I "foolishly" walk in a T-shirt, through the streets of Donetsk, with the image of "the president of a neighboring country" (I have so much health not "fatite"). It’s very hard to survive in Donetsk “shirim” by “potsrietam.” Ecology, mlyn ... But “we are in ATO in Debaltseve“ PEREMOGLI ”.
  51. +3
    15 October 2015 20: 17
    that in Russia “86% of people are happy”
    What kind of insanity? Is the Russian language wide and rich? What kind of college student translated this, perhaps into Chinese, and then another similar one back, or even into Belarusian? It’s true that they don’t give a Nobel for nothing. Gorbachev, Obama - this is quite enough to send that prize away. They also wanted to assign it to Putin, but according to the diploma. channels received advice - “just try it!, he will ignore you because we know what you are giving it to and to whom, you will disgrace yourself!”
  52. +3
    15 October 2015 20: 21
    “This is an occupation, this is a foreign invasion,” said Aleksiyevich.


    Yes, you are right Svetlana!
    This really is a foreign invasion!
    Which started with Maidan, cookies, the murder of Berkut!
    From the beginning of the so-called “ATO”, when various rabble were poured into the ditch, who were then dumped in the summer of 2014 and winter of 2015!
    This really is a foreign invasion!
    When the so-called “power is dead”, and not even “power”, but so... “henchmen”!
    Sixes, their mother!
    This really is a foreign invasion!
    When everything is completely farmed out in the ditch!
    And in conclusion: Svetlana! I still had a better opinion of you! It’s a pity, it’s a pity that my opinion of you has changed so dramatically!

    1. +2
      15 October 2015 20: 32
      Add -

      - Helen! I kiss your hands! love
      And as an officer - soldier


      And the Nobel Committee, as well as other “offices” (UN, OSCE...), unfortunately, have lost their original meaning, their original essence!
      I already wrote that there are no more organizations in the world that are called upon to help defuse tensions in the world and that are capable of resolving conflict situations!
  53. +1
    15 October 2015 20: 25
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    It all started with a peace prize to ram Obama?

    Everything happened much earlier to the hunchback and to the Finnish representative who worked for the secession of Kosovo.
    Maybe some other forgotten under.hatch.i.
  54. +1
    15 October 2015 21: 07
    This humanoid should have received a slap on the head from the Almighty for the “Zinc Boys”, and Satan should have given her a bonus. what Is there justice on Earth?
    1. +1
      16 October 2015 10: 33
      There is no justice. More precisely, there is, but they are always trying to destroy it.
  55. +2
    15 October 2015 21: 11
    Judas, they are all fellow tribesmen, as you can see. And they are not distinguished by morality... The hunchbacks are ruled by the grave.
  56. 0
    15 October 2015 21: 25
    The Nobel Prize Committee needs to re-certify. In recent years they have been giving out prizes to the wrong people.
  57. +1
    15 October 2015 21: 30
    I take my hat off to Hélène RICHARD-FAVRE and bow deeply to her for her actions!
  58. +1
    15 October 2015 21: 53
    The Nobel Prize is not cookies! This is real money. Say what you're paid to say and get bonuses!! Total prostitution, that’s capitalism. Everything is for sale, the only difference is the price and corresponding perversions.

    And the west? It does not rot, unfortunately this is the territory of developing Satanism (((((
  59. 0
    15 October 2015 21: 53
    I immediately remembered the Oscar for Leviathan. Zvyagintsev honestly admitted that the Americans told him in plain text: if he does not change the scene of action (and actually based on the case of Marvin Heemeyer, Colorado) - He won't get any Oscar!
  60. win
    +5
    15 October 2015 22: 03
    I downloaded Alexievich’s book “Second Hand Time.” This is a set of her thoughts, like "a person who chooses from a hundred varieties of sausage in a store, freerthan a person who chooses from ten varieties"
    And such “profound” statements throughout the book... And this book costs from 404 to 576 rubles. I wanted to write "srebrenikov"
  61. +1
    15 October 2015 22: 22
    the war in Donbass, which claimed the lives of more than 8 thousand people, was the result of foreign intervention


    Absolutely.
    The United States paid for the seizure of power by the fascists and the start of the civil war.
    True, we were counting on the Libyan scenario, but it didn’t work out - Donbass did not allow it to slide into the chaos of a war of all against all.
    That’s why they didn’t bother to push long-term proteges into the top of the government in advance - they installed idiot puppets, whom they wouldn’t mind sacrificing. Now they are trying to intensify the war by sending in specialists.
    So it's true - the Civil War was the result of foreign intervention.
  62. +5
    15 October 2015 23: 07
    Hélène Richard-Favre, I give you a standing ovation. It’s just that when many of the “rednecks” receive a leveled Nobel Prize, they forget the actual history of its creation. I cannot understand how a “complete aggressor” can receive a “peace prize.” “For literary activity” - “blatant illiteracy in literature.”
  63. 0
    16 October 2015 02: 05
    The CIA fell for the rotten writings and decided to make it a laureate...shame!!!
  64. +1
    16 October 2015 02: 33
    What does this have to do with “brotherly people”? We have plenty of our own Makarevichs. You won't get a Nobel Prize for a good deed. To do this you need a lot of “mouth us..t”.
  65. +2
    16 October 2015 02: 57
    Svetana Alexievich? Well, I’ve heard quite a lot, this “specialist” has already been noted on the VO website: “...at the instigation of the Belarusian writer Svetlana Alexievich, some publicists and researchers in Russia are trying to establish in society the opinion that the sniper is an overly inhumane front-line specialty.” . and then there’s “in Russia, “86% of people became happy” about the murder of people in Donetsk,” but you, auntie, did you eat fly agaric mushrooms, where and when were these statistics collected?! I didn’t see a single indifferent person when all this started. The jokes in the groups ended immediately, as soon as one started talking about this topic...

    “Madame Alexievich, you are not just lying... no, you are slandering and giving false witness to an entire people, country, state. Without any respect and hope for understanding” - this is how I personally would probably end the message to the fiction writer Alexievich, as well as the Swiss writer It turned out very well in Russian - short and clear :)
  66. 0
    16 October 2015 06: 17
    I’ll say it briefly and clearly Alexievich = Makarevich))
  67. +1
    16 October 2015 06: 31
    a good slap in the face, most importantly completely sobering, like a cold shower after dizziness from “success”
  68. +4
    16 October 2015 07: 36
    Yes, they don’t give the Nobel Prize so easily; for this you have to really screw up Russia. Well done Helen!!!
  69. 0
    16 October 2015 08: 10
    Alexievich is a sellout, he who pays dances.
  70. 0
    16 October 2015 08: 46
    As always, I'm a little off topic. A question. I propose to simply close the border to the entry and exit of goods. Not people. Russia is SELF-SUFFICIENT, this has been said a hundred times. Let's trade with ourselves. Well, or with our neighbors India, China, Iran... Although we can produce silk ourselves))
  71. +1
    16 October 2015 09: 38
    What is supposed to happen happens. “Madame Alexievich” earns the money she receives as best she can. Now, if “Madame” started praising Russia, it would be worthwhile to care. Much more alarming is the medal issued by “our Western partners” for some successes of Madame Nabiullina... No?
  72. +2
    16 October 2015 11: 05
    Alexievich is a disgrace to the Belarusian people! We still need to look for a second one. This is from that cohort of liberals who are ready to sell their Motherland, friends, absolutely everything - just to be against everyone. Corrupt scum - in a word! She doesn't get a Nobel Prize, but an aspen stake! angry
  73. win
    +3
    16 October 2015 13: 49
    Alexievich was given 30 pieces of silver.
    Soooo. Swedish krona exchange rate = 7,62 rubles. Her book costs about 76 rubles.
    So one book costs 10 pieces of silver. How many of these books are there?
    Business, however ...
  74. +1
    16 October 2015 14: 44
    Obama is a Nobel Peace Prize winner. dot. It is no longer possible to discredit the Nobel Foundation.
  75. +1
    16 October 2015 14: 50
    Quote: Ramzaj99
    Where the world is heading ..... If already the Nobel Prizes are given not to those who are worthy, but to those who are nicer to lick ....
    After such things, you begin to lose faith in humanity in general, and in the fact that justice will ever triumph on this fucking planet .....
    Ugh((((...

    Maybe you forgot? - the ape-like creature had already been awarded the Peace Prize! And after that IT managed to start several wars in the world. Turn the previously unstable peace in the Middle East into complete chaos, and I’m generally silent about Ukraine!
  76. 0
    16 October 2015 15: 26
    With what other respect? Such people should be despised and judged.
  77. +1
    16 October 2015 16: 09
    You are not just mistaken, you have despised reality.


    These correct words should also be addressed to the members of the Nobel Committee.

    Otherwise, how could Barack Obama and Mikhail Gorbachev be among the laureates?
  78. +1
    16 October 2015 19: 28
    She is not Alexievich, but Gadya Petrovich Khrenova...
  79. 0
    16 October 2015 20: 24
    A little more and Alekseevich will talk here, I’m like Brodsky, I’m like Sholokhov...
    What lowness.
  80. 0
    16 October 2015 22: 20
    I wanted to write about Madame Alekseevna, but I remembered that on this site you cannot express yourself about voluntarism.
  81. ingridfk3
    0
    17 October 2015 18: 30
    Test, just a test
  82. 0
    17 October 2015 21: 13
    As the chairman of the jury of the international prize (Writer, literary scholar and literary critic), Sarah Danius will announce the name of the laureate this year. Founded in 1786, the Swedish Academy is dedicated to the study and organization of the Swedish language and literature.It consists of a limited number of places that belong for life to famous Swedish writers, scientists, and public figures whose works are considered exemplary. The Academy has awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature annually since 1901, according to the will of Alfred Nobel.
    Swedish writers received an aesthetic org..., aesthetic pleasure.
    Well, think about it, the laureate made a mistake...But no. Aleksievich was born in Ukraine.
  83. +1
    17 October 2015 23: 15
    What relation does this noblewoman have to the Russians?
  84. +1
    17 October 2015 23: 37
    What kind of prize was this Nobel? Peace Prize to Obama. For what? Now this laureate, I just haven’t watched winning films for a long time, I’m tired of perverts and some problems known only to the authors. I don’t read the winning books, that’s proof. I read the classics and watch the classics.
  85. darrenqq11
    0
    18 October 2015 00: 00
    Test, just a test
  86. thomasjs3
    0
    18 October 2015 00: 52
    Test, just a test
  87. 0
    18 October 2015 00: 52
    Test, just a test
  88. PVA
    +2
    18 October 2015 12: 06
    I take my hat off, Madame Richard! Unfortunately, even people like Alexievich also need to be put in their place. And it’s good that it was you who did it.