The name of the seventh "Boreas" has become known.

October 13 2015 123

The seventh strategic submarine of the Borey type will receive the name of one of the representatives of the Romanov dynasty - "Emperor Alexander III". An order of this has already been signed, told the correspondent TASS source in the Russian Navy.

"Bookmark (submarine) is scheduled for the second half of December this year," - added the source.

The agency recalls that before 2020, construction of a Borey-type 8 submarine is planned, three of which have already been handed over to the customer - the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Each cruiser is armed with 16-th Bulava intercontinental missiles.

Currently, the construction of submarines continues on the modernized project "Borey-A".

123 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

oleg-gr

+39

13 October 2015 15: 20

Peter the Great is, and there will be Alexander III. History must be remembered and reminded to "friends".
1. sever.56
  
  +32
  
  13 October 2015 15: 26
  
  A worthy name of the great sovereign Alexander III the formidable weapon of Russia.
  Let the number of ascent be equal to the number of dives ... !!!
  1. Baikonur
    
    +50
    
    13 October 2015 15: 48
    
    A worthy name ... the formidable weapon of Russia.
    
    I would also mention Ivan the Terrible at naming!
    So much dirt and lies were poured on him, but in fact, at that time the ruler of Russia was very wise and powerful!
    PS: "Ivan IV ruled longer than any ruler who ever stood at the head of the Russian state - 50 years and 105 days."
    1. Manul
      
      +13
      
      13 October 2015 16: 43
      
      Quote: Baikonur
      I would also mention Ivan the Terrible at naming!
      
      From the language removed!
      And in principle, a beautiful name for the missile carrier "Ivan the Terrible"! Everyone immediately understands everything
      1. the polar
        
        +6
        
        13 October 2015 19: 33
        
        The roof of the Kremlin White Guards rots and smells, they are completely crazy with anti-Sovietism. How do they still "Admiral Kolchak" on which thread the board is not registered.
        
        But "Captain Marinescu" got them across the throat from what ... probably too many German submariners drowned, the German Frau may take offense and impose a sanction on the head of her Kremlin friend.
        
        Karabanov
        
        +7
        
        13 October 2015 20: 11
        
        Quote: Polar
        The roof of the Kremlin White Guards rots and smells, they are completely crazy with anti-Sovietism. How do they still "Admiral Kolchak" on which thread the board is not registered.
        
        You are probably not too familiar with naval history. It seems to me that more likely is the continuity of traditions than anti-Sovietism.
        Of course, in Soviet times, preference was given to the names of communist leaders and heroes, as well as different anniversaries (which sounded ridiculous), but the same "Varyag" existed as a symbol of the heroism of Russian sailors of the imperial fleet. By the way, about the name "Peter the Great" (the creator of the Russian fleet), do you by any chance mind?
        The name of the ship - "Alexander III" has its own history. Heroic story! This ship fought bravely during the Battle of Tsushima and died heroically with all the crew, fulfilling its duty to the end. For me personally, and I think for many who are familiar with the history of our fleet, the name is associated with this and does not cause rejection.
        PS Regarding Alexander Marinesco, I am only for it.
        
        crazyrom
        
        0
        
        14 October 2015 03: 04
        
        It's all for a reason. The previous ones are Prince, Generalissimo, and “just” names (albeit great ones). And then the EMPEROR! The empire is reborn, Lord.
        
        KUOLEMA
        
        +2
        
        14 October 2015 02: 30
        
        The main thing is that Beni Eltsin should not be called or Chubais
        
        SergeyKus
        
        0
        
        14 October 2015 22: 36
        
        Prior to Marinescu and Lunin, as well as other famous commanders, the same line will reach.
    2. whiteeagle
      
      -17
      
      13 October 2015 20: 25
      
      as a result of the policy of Ivan the Terrible, the state was very weak and this opened the door for Poles
      1. NordUral
        
        +7
        
        13 October 2015 21: 00
        
        You had bad mentors. Grozny and Stalin are the two greatest rulers of our country.
      2. dvina71
        
        +2
        
        13 October 2015 21: 43
        
        Quote: whiteeagle
        as a result of the policy of Ivan the Terrible, the state was very weak and this opened the door for Poles
        
        Yeah .. you’ll find out a lot of new things on the Internet .. And I always thought that the reason for the unrest was the weather. A long period of crop failure, which pushed the peasants off the ground in search of food. It’s not difficult to guess who had this to eat .. and to whom they came.
        And Ivan 4 increased the territory of the Moscow Kingdom many times over, which saved Russia from Polish enslavement in many ways. The third militia, ending with turmoil and intervention, gathered on the Volga and in the northern lands.
    3. NordUral
      
      +5
      
      13 October 2015 20: 55
      
      We ruined all the rulers, which created our country - Grozny, Lenin, Stalin. We know practically nothing about the father of Grozny, Vasily, and he began what his son finished. And about the Soviet era, everyone was misinterpreted into 80's and still lie. It is time to merit the great and insignificant rulers of Russia and the USSR in order to know where and how we should move. To bring back the core idea - social justice.
2. Vyacheslav 64
  
  +19
  
  13 October 2015 15: 30
  
  Alexander 3 - Great Emperor, Emperor peacemaker, as his contemporaries called him. "While the Russian Emperor is fishing, Europe can wait"
  1. the polar
    
    -19
    
    13 October 2015 19: 46
    
    Quote: Vyacheslav 64
    Alexander 3 - Great Emperor, Emperor peacemaker, as his contemporaries called him. "While the Russian Emperor is fishing, Europe can wait"
    
    "While the Russian emperor is drinking, Russia can wait."
    The next "Borey" is probably "Borya E." will be called so that "Alexander 3" is not bored.
    1. Boa kaa
      
      +1
      
      13 October 2015 20: 33
      
      Quote: Polar
      The next "Borey" is probably "Borya E." will be called so that "Alexander 3" is not bored.
      
      And what ... Borya- "Borey" - he is! He can!
    2. Vyacheslav 64
      
      -6
      
      13 October 2015 21: 29
      
      "While the Russian emperor is drinking, Russia can wait."
      The next "Borey" is probably "Borya E." will be called so that "Alexander 3" is not bored.
      And you, it would not be bad, to learn a little history before trying to be silly here to "play smart". It describes the reason for the Emperor's addiction to alcohol in the last years of his life !!!
    3. the villain
      
      +1
      
      13 October 2015 23: 00
      
      Quote: Polar
      The next "Borey" is probably "Borya E." will be named
      
      Iron of shame will not stand ...
      Well, don't be remembered by night.
  2. ksv1973
    
    -1
    
    13 October 2015 20: 00
    
    Quote: Vyacheslav 64
    Alexander 3 - Great Emperor, Emperor peacemaker, as his contemporaries called him. "While the Russian Emperor is fishing, Europe can wait"
    
    Would have called it simply and tastefully - "Peacemaker"! The most THAT for such a device!
    1. the villain
      
      +2
      
      13 October 2015 23: 03
      
      Quote: ksv1973
      Peacemaker
      
      Pacifier. So it will be more exact IMHO
      1. ksv1973
        
        +1
        
        13 October 2015 23: 15
        
        Quote: Villain
        Quote: ksv1973
        Peacemaker
        
        Pacifier. So it will be more exact IMHO
        
        Support!
3. Russian Uzbek
  
  -18
  
  13 October 2015 15: 34
  
  I swear in the Romanov dynasty there were more worthy rulers
  1. Alexey RA
    
    +26
    
    13 October 2015 15: 44
    
    Quote: Russian Uzbek
    I swear in the Romanov dynasty there were more worthy rulers
    
    Here it’s fitting to rejoice that a less worthy name has not been received. For example, the same Nicky.
    
    By the way, the famous saying
    In the whole world we have only 2 faithful allies: our army and navy
    belongs precisely to Alexander III.
    
    Although the name of the ship "Emperor Alexander III" will always remind fans of the history of the fleet of Tsushima ...
    1. Russian Uzbek
      
      -17
      
      13 October 2015 15: 55
      
      "" It is just right to be glad that a less worthy name was not given. For example, the same Nicky ""
      It would be a fly away!
      but if you consider that Nikolashka the Bloody ruled according to the precepts of his father, then ...
    2. Vorobey-1
      
      +3
      
      13 October 2015 15: 57
      
      "Emperor Alexander III" is a magnificent title!
      Emperor - the word speaks for itself
      Alexander - "Defender of People", "Winner" (the name of the great commanders: Alexander Nevsky, Alexander the Great)
    3. Nissa-on
      
      +4
      
      13 October 2015 16: 06
      
      Although the name of the ship "Emperor Alexander III" will always remind fans of the history of the fleet of Tsushima ...
      
      Straight from the "language removed." But the same amateurs know that the "Alexander III" had a guard crew, and the entire crew died at the post.
      A worthy name!
      1. jjj
        
        +4
        
        13 October 2015 16: 19
        
        By the way, "Varyag" is already in some kind of reincarnation. And the steamers are in excellent service
        
        Alexey RA
        
        +2
        
        13 October 2015 16: 28
        
        Quote: jjj
        By the way, "Varyag" is already in some kind of reincarnation. And the steamers are in excellent service
        
        I’ll have fun: the last of the Varyags is a gas turbine.
      2. Alexey RA
        
        +2
        
        13 October 2015 16: 29
        
        Quote: Nissa-on
        Straight from the "language removed." But the same amateurs know that the "Alexander III" had a guard crew, and the entire crew died at the post.
        A worthy name!
        
        This is yes. Not Eagle or Raphael.
    4. segamegament
      
      +5
      
      13 October 2015 19: 31
      
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Although the name of the ship "Emperor Alexander III" will always remind fans of the history of the fleet of Tsushima ...
      
      Well, maybe just this "emperor" will get even for Tsushima, who knows ...
    5. ksv1973
      
      0
      
      13 October 2015 23: 23
      
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Although the name of the ship "Emperor Alexander III" will always remind fans of the history of the fleet of Tsushima ...
      
      So I’m somehow uncomfortable with this news. Calling watercraft by the names of their predecessors that drowned is like a woman on a ship! Then even Novikov-Priboy would agree with me ...
  2. aleks 62 next
    
    +4
    
    13 October 2015 15: 59
    
    .... I swear in the Romanov dynasty there were more worthy rulers ...
    
    ... Are you hinting at Nikolashka worthless ????? .....
    1. Russian Uzbek
      
      +6
      
      13 October 2015 16: 12
      
      for example Empress Elizaveta Petrovna, "daughter of Peter the Great" ... and in general why the Germanic Romanovs? (Elizaveta Petrovna, by the way, is the LAST RUSSIAN among the Romanovs) why not from Rurikovich? or Ivan 3 for example is not big enough?
      and the name STALIN is your name?
      1. RUSIVAN
        
        +2
        
        13 October 2015 17: 18
        
        You have mastered the school course in History, or you are insulted that you were not asked what was to be called ?!
        
        Russian Uzbek
        
        +1
        
        13 October 2015 17: 29
        
        But what is necessary to throw a hat in the air and scream cheers?
        Yes, and the school course of history would not hurt many to master
        AND AT ALL DO NOT LIKE ME THE CONJECTURE FOR RESTORATION OF THE MONARCHY
        
        ALEA IACTA EST
        
        -1
        
        13 October 2015 21: 28
        
        Quote: Russian Uzbek
        AND AT ALL DO NOT LIKE ME THE CONJECTURE FOR RESTORATION OF THE MONARCHY
        
        Do the French also want to restore the monarchy?
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Moore
        
        0
        
        14 October 2015 04: 29
        
        Quote: Russian Uzbek
        (Elizaveta Petrovna, by the way, LAST RUSSIAN among the Romanovs)
        
        Dear Russian Uzbek, sorry, they wrote nonsense.
        How can the daughter of the Russian tsar and German be more Russian than, for example, the daughter of Tsar Ivan V (brother and co-ruler of Tsar Peter I) and Tsarina Praskovya - Anna Ioannovna?
        We are talking about blood, not about the spirit. If about him, then the pure German Sophia Augusta Frederic of Anhalt-Zerbskaya (in our opinion - Catherine II) will give odds to all of the above.
  3. kepmor
    
    -1
    
    13 October 2015 16: 07
    
    Especially Nicholas II!
  4. RUSIVAN
    
    0
    
    13 October 2015 17: 14
    
    Even worthy of you ...
  5. NordUral
    
    -6
    
    13 October 2015 21: 04
    
    There were two relatively normal kings in the Romanov dynasty - Nicholas I and Alexander II, and that’s all.
4. Finches
  
  +10
  
  13 October 2015 15: 37
  
  Alexander III is beautiful, don’t tell! He didn’t want to make his son Tsar Nicholas II, preparing his eldest son George, but ... Clio does not know the subjunctive mood!
5. ava09
  
  +6
  
  13 October 2015 15: 52
  
  Quote: oleg-gr
  Peter the Great is, and there will be Alexander III. History must be remembered and reminded to "friends".
  
  Should I remember history or Russian chronology? The Romanovs, who made so much effort to erase the true chronology of the Russians, are not, in this respect, "Great" as you respectfully call Peter the Great.
6. aleks 62 next
  
  +3
  
  13 October 2015 15: 58
  
  .... Peter the Great is, will be Alexander III ....
  
  .... I read it right away and almost sweated - Nicholas II imagined .... I reread it - it eased .... :)))))))
  1. AlNikolaich
    
    -1
    
    13 October 2015 19: 38
    
    Quote: aleks 62 next
    .... Peter the Great is, will be Alexander III ....
    
    .... I read it right away and almost sweated - Nicholas II imagined .... I reread it - it eased .... :)))))))
    
    Cross three times, buddy!
    A worthy name for the cruiser will be!
7. Gradus HuK
  
  0
  
  13 October 2015 16: 53
  
  Hurray! Hurray! Hurray! A worthy name for the Premier League!
8. Sea Wolf
  
  +3
  
  13 October 2015 17: 44
  
  It was Alexander the Third, named the peacemaker, who said that Russia has two allies: its army and its fleet. He was a great man. He loved to drink, and hid from his wife a flask of cognac behind the bootleg.
MIKHALYCH1

+8

13 October 2015 15: 20

Emperor .. I like the name!
1. Air Force captain
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2015 15: 25
  
  In general, a series of submarines data, the codename emperor (and not Borey) would have come in handy ... and the names corresponding (Peter1, Nikolai 2, Catherine the Great ... etc ...) would be appropriate ... but I do not insist .. so ... dreamed))
  1. veksha50
    
    +15
    
    13 October 2015 15: 34
    
    Quote: Air Force Captain
    and names respectively (Petr1, Nicholas 2, Catherine the Great ... etc.
    
    No need Nicholas 2 on the same level with Peter and Catherine the Great to put ... He then just the empire and profiled ...
    1. Rusich is not from Kiev
      
      -13
      
      13 October 2015 15: 41
      
      Quote: veksha50
      It’s not necessary to put Nicholas 2 on the same level with Peter and Catherine the Great ... He’s just an empire and profiled ..
      
      So Peter I laid the foundation for this collapse. That demon.
      1. mitya24
        
        +9
        
        13 October 2015 16: 11
        
        The one that created the Empire? Stop talking nonsense.
        
        ava09
        
        +1
        
        14 October 2015 09: 47
        
        Quote: mitya24
        The one that created the Empire? Stop talking nonsense.
        
        Be careful with the "nonsense", it is not yet known for certain who is carrying it, thanks to the diligence of the Romanovs. And be careful with the empire, after the death of Grozny, who tried to destroy it, not the eternal "enemies of the people" - the boyars?
        
        Rusich is not from Kiev
        
        0
        
        16 October 2015 07: 51
        
        Quote: mitya24
        The one that created the Empire? Stop talking nonsense.
        
        Like before him there was nothing, right? Well, if for the sake of the Empire, which even after winning pays a loser a lot of money for land, you need to destroy or ruin a third of the country's population, then well, nafig.
        It was Peter who divided the united people into nobles and plebeians, who, in the year 17, clashed.
        It was he who destroyed everything Russian indiscriminately and took everything foreign also indiscriminately.
        It was he who brought power to the thieves such as Menshikov, who did not have a sense of proportion at all.
        It was he who turned the peasants from practically free people into real slaves.
        It was he who brought all this foreign shaika which ruled directly until Elizabeth and remained in power until 17 years.
        All his successes are manufactories. But was it worth them to destroy the whole world.
      2. ALEA IACTA EST
        
        +1
        
        13 October 2015 21: 32
        
        [quote = Rusich is not from Kiev] He's still a demon. [/ quote.]
        Here is a demon, he made Russia a great power ... I will never forgive him for this!
        
        Rusich is not from Kiev
        
        0
        
        16 October 2015 07: 55
        
        Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
        Here is a demon, he made Russia a great power ... I will never forgive him for this!
        
        And what was she before? What are some idiots .. have they lived there? That the fleet was not its own and the ships could not build? Guns to pour? That there were no regiments of the foreign system? Didn’t send to study? All the reforms that Peter made were started by his father, without any fanaticism.
        Peter's empire turned into Bironovschina, here is his legacy.
2. veksha50
  
  +5
  
  13 October 2015 15: 32
  
  Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
  Emperor .. I like the name!
  
  It’s not for nothing that the enemies itch about the imperial aspirations of Russia ... Especially Naglia, who, as an empire, has lost itself long ago, but is the worst enemy of Russia ...
  
  PS Russian Empire ... But what? It sounds! ...
ilyaches

+11

13 October 2015 15: 20

Seven feet under the keel.
1. the villain
  
  0
  
  13 October 2015 23: 15
  
  Quote: ilyaches
  Seven feet under the keel.
  
  Better than an equal number of dives and ascent, these are divers
Engineer

+8

13 October 2015 15: 21

"Russia has only two allies: its army and navy" Alexander III. It is difficult to find a more worthy emperor.
Petr1

-18

13 October 2015 15: 21

And I would suggest calling it President Putin, what is the point of calling the boat the name of the long-dead king, let him be afraid of President Putin ...
1. jaguar
  
  +4
  
  13 October 2015 15: 23
  
  Well, it’s your dearest already suffered
  1. Petr1
    
    +1
    
    13 October 2015 15: 29
    
    Quote: jaguar
    Well, it’s your dearest already suffered
    
    But what, unworthy?
    1. Bombardier
      
      +3
      
      13 October 2015 15: 44
      
      Quote: Petr1
      Quote: jaguar
      Well, it’s your dearest already suffered
      
      But what, unworthy?
      
      It's too early ....
      1. made13
        
        +21
        
        13 October 2015 15: 53
        
        Someday, the fleet will include the Generalissimo Stalin
        
        Russian Uzbek
        
        +2
        
        13 October 2015 17: 34
        
        "" Someday the fleet will include Generalissimo Stalin "" "
        are dreaming ... that you are here suggesting some kind of totalitarian and non-handshake names! Rather, "Nicholas 2" will be called a HOLY!
        
        AlNikolaich
        
        +2
        
        13 October 2015 19: 45
        
        Quote: Russian Uzbek
        "" Someday the fleet will include Generalissimo Stalin "" "
        are dreaming ... that you are here suggesting some kind of totalitarian and non-handshake names! Rather, "Nicholas 2" will be called a HOLY!
        
        Quote: Russian Uzbek
        "" Someday the fleet will include Generalissimo Stalin "" "
        are dreaming ... that you are here suggesting some kind of totalitarian and non-handshake names! Rather, "Nicholas 2" will be called a HOLY!
        
        Well, not knowing how you are ... The fact that Nikolai the martyr agrees, but he is far from the saint.
        Whatever the church says. I personally do not accept the execution of the king and his family. Citizen Romanov Nikolai Alexandrovich was supposed to live, and with his family to benefit the young
        Soviet republic! For man was not stupid and educated!
        Well, what happened is what happened ...
        
        NordUral
        
        0
        
        15 October 2015 20: 04
        
        Nicholas II was not lucky to be born a simple man, this is his misfortune and the misfortune of Russia.
        
        ava09
        
        +2
        
        13 October 2015 20: 50
        
        Quote: Russian Uzbek
        "" Someday the fleet will include Generalissimo Stalin "" "
        are dreaming ... that you are here suggesting some kind of totalitarian and non-handshake names! Rather, "Nicholas 2" will be called a HOLY!
        
        You are some kind of muddy ... And not Russian or Uzbek for good. Nobody gave you the right to define "handshake". Stalin said to himself: - "I am a Russian person of Georgian nationality" and I believe him. I believe because if he were what the enemies of Russia made him, she would never, under his rule, reach the highest rise in self-consciousness and the greatest VICTORIES in the chronology of RUSSIANS.
        
        Russian Uzbek
        
        -1
        
        13 October 2015 21: 14
        
        I’m neither Russian nor Uzbek, I’m Russian Uzbek ... or Uzbek Uzbek - whatever ...
        about "handshake" is irony;)
        
        NordUral
        
        0
        
        15 October 2015 20: 07
        
        I am Russian, although my father is German and my mother is Russian. I’m Russian and I will repeat it a thousand times. And I will not deny the names of those who moved Russia forward. Although he himself was fooled at one time, but the veil fell from his eyes. And thanks for the internet!
        
        NordUral
        
        0
        
        15 October 2015 20: 03
        
        Which are already there. A good wish.
        
        ALEA IACTA EST
        
        0
        
        13 October 2015 21: 35
        
        Quote: made13
        Someday, the fleet will include the Generalissimo Stalin
        
        And it would be nice to perpetuate all the rulers of Russia ...
        Dream, dream ...
        
        the villain
        
        +1
        
        13 October 2015 23: 25
        
        Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
        And it would be nice to perpetuate all the rulers of Russia ...
        
        It’s all too much, I recall two offhand, I planted one corn, and the second did not have enough consensus ...
2. Engineer
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2015 15: 42
  
  Russian naval traditions are honored
3. samara-58
  
  0
  
  13 October 2015 16: 20
  
  Join us!
Victor bg

+8

13 October 2015 15: 23

References to historical figures, young people are interested in history, and who does not remember kinship .. with those you yourself know what is happening.
1. Amurets
  
  +7
  
  13 October 2015 16: 13
  
  And the names of the heroic ships. Or the famous officer dynasties. Yes, in our Russo-Japanese war how many heroes were there. More sailors got more names than sailors. But the ship commanders must be remembered and their ships should be named: Commander Varyaga Rudnev, Commander Rurik Trusov, Commander Aurora Egoriev. The Aurora is not only a symbol of revolution. It is the heroic ship of the 2 Pacific Squadron, the legendary training ship .And the exploits of the Varangian and Rurik, these are the legends of our fleet.
  1. AlNikolaich
    
    +2
    
    13 October 2015 19: 49
    
    Quote: Amurets
    And the names of the heroic ships. Or the famous officer dynasties. Yes, in our Russo-Japanese war how many heroes were there. More sailors got more names than sailors. But the ship commanders must be remembered and their ships should be named: Commander Varyaga Rudnev, Commander Rurik Trusov, Commander Aurora Egoriev. The Aurora is not only a symbol of revolution. It is the heroic ship of the 2 Pacific Squadron, the legendary training ship .And the exploits of the Varangian and Rurik, these are the legends of our fleet.
    
    A colleague, I believe that with our growing fleet, there will be new ships that will gain
    the names of these illustrious people!
    1. NordUral
      
      0
      
      15 October 2015 20: 09
      
      Your words yes to God in your ears!
MIKHALYCH1

+6

13 October 2015 15: 24

Quote: oleg-gr
Peter the Great is, and there will be Alexander III. History must be remembered and reminded to "friends".

The name is not important .. The main task and its implementation!
Vyacheslav73

+3

13 October 2015 15: 24

Specialists - please explain what are the essential differences between the Borey and Borey-A projects ???
1. jaguar
  
  +5
  
  13 October 2015 15: 31
  
  The most important there will be 20 missiles, as opposed to 16 on the borea.
2. Boa kaa
  
  +4
  
  13 October 2015 21: 20
  
  Quote: Vyacheslav73
  what are the significant differences between the Borey and Borey-A projects
  
  Starting from the 4th hull of Project 955 (conditionally Project 09554), the shape of the boat's hull will be changed - it will be closer to the initial appearance of Project 955. The boats will be built without using the backlog from the Project 971 submarine. In the nose compartments of the RPKSN, it is planned to abandon the double-hull with the placement of the antenna device of the Irtysh-Amphora SJSC in the nose. The extended body antennas of the SAC will also be used. The torpedo tubes will be moved closer to the center of the hull and become airborne, the bow rudders will be moved to the wheelhouse. In the area of SLBM mines, it is planned to reduce the size of the permeable superstructure. The number of mines will remain 16. The power plant will probably also be modernized towards unification with other submarines of the 4th generation - it is planned to use a new steam generating plant. In fact, we are talking about a new pr. RpkSN. On July 30, 2012, the first submarine pr.955A "Knyaz Vladimir" was officially laid down at PO "Sevmash" in Severodvinsk.
  jaguar: "The most important there will be 20 missiles, as opposed to 16 on the Borea."
  Borey-A will carry 16 SLBMs of the D-30 / 3K30 Bulava complex with R-30 / SS-NX-30 missiles developed by MIT. According to 2013 (and earlier), it was believed that the cruiser pr.955A will have 20 SLBM launchers. Refuted in an interview with the director of PO "Sevmash" on 17.02.2013: "Az" will continue to have 16 SLBMs. (Technology, equipment, conveyor)
vovanpain

+15

13 October 2015 15: 25

Of course, the headquarters know better what to call it, but why was it called "Alexander III" from the Romanov dynasty, and not from the Rurik dynasty, like the other boats of the project "Ivan the Terrible" for example?
avt

+5

13 October 2015 15: 25

A good name, but the eighth must be called "Citizen Minin" without fail! This is not the case - "Prince Pozharsky" is, but, Citizen Minin "is not."
1. kil 31
  
  +4
  
  13 October 2015 15: 28
  
  In the reign of Alexander III, Russia did not wage a single war. For peacekeeping, the monarch received the honorary nickname Tsar the Peacemaker from the people. Is this in connection with this?
2. Aleksey_K
  
  +8
  
  13 October 2015 15: 49
  
  Quote: avt
  A good name, but the eighth must be called "Citizen Minin" without fail! This is not the case - "Prince Pozharsky" is, but, Citizen Minin "is not."
  
  The ship must carry a Name and Surname. Therefore "Kuzma Minin" is better. At the same time it also has "Kuz'kina's mother" (16 pieces).
  1. avt
    
    +7
    
    13 October 2015 15: 58
    
    Quote: Алексей_К
    The ship must carry a Name and Surname. Therefore "Kuzma Minin" is better.
    
    He is recorded in history as a Citizen, well, "Kuzma Minin" is also normal. The main thing is that there was such a ship with that name next to a similar one in class, "Prince Pozharsky", it is NOT possible to separate them.
    1. Alexey RA
      
      +5
      
      13 October 2015 16: 33
      
      Quote: avt
      He is recorded in history as a Citizen, well, "Kuzma Minin" is also normal. The main thing is that there was such a ship with that name next to a similar one in class, "Prince Pozharsky", it is NOT possible to separate them.
      
      He-he-he ... the armored frigate RIF also initially wanted to be called "Citizen Minin". But then the "citizen" from the name disappeared somewhere ...
      But the armored frigate "Prince Pozharsky" remained with the title in its name.
katalonec2014

+2

13 October 2015 15: 26

The Emperor, so the Emperor, will be waiting for him. Probably by the time he is included in the Russian Navy, he will already be Borey-B.
nazar_0753

+5

13 October 2015 15: 27

A decent name for an excellent submarine
ratfly

+2

13 October 2015 15: 28

Only not Nicholas II. He was such an empire. Shit! Yes, even denied Pascud. Rest in peace.
The comment was deleted.
saturn.mmm

+1

13 October 2015 15: 38

It is a well-deserved and honorable name, I hope, like Alexander III, you won’t have to fight, but Russia’s prestige will be raised to a new higher level.
Old Siberian

+2

13 October 2015 15: 38

A worthy name for a worthy weapon. The name of a peacemaker cannot be put to shame.
Mareman Vasilich

+18

13 October 2015 15: 44

And why not Generalissimo Stalin, Marshal Rokossovsky, Marshal Zhukov, and so on. After all, the Romanov dynasty was already kissed on all sides. But everything Soviet is denigrated and forgotten. Although only under Stalin in 30 years the country achieved more than the Romanov dynasty in 300 years. In the days of the USSR, we built libraries, schools, houses and factories with factories, and now only trading and barging nets and churches with mosques and synagogues. I have nothing against exactly against Alexander III, but it may be enough to lick tsarism with its serfdom, or maybe it’s worth it to really turn to the great. But the authorities will not go to the revival of the good memory of the Soviet past. Under tsarism there were gentlemen and serfs, serfs; under Soviet rule, all were equal. So the power of this equality is afraid. The present time, the time of neo-serfdom is prettier to them. and slaves with idiots have always been the main resource of capitalism. But at the same time, the entire current system is completely based on the Soviet legacy. In addition to mansions, churches with mosques and entertainment centers, the current system has not created anything. But at the same time he plays on the consciousness of people as a musical instrument, realizing that people will not go to the Maidan, destroying their country. That's what a shame, people believe in power, and she makes idiots out of them.
1. Severomor
  
  +7
  
  13 October 2015 16: 15
  
  And why not Generalissimo Stalin, Marshal Rokossovsky
  
  - they served the people.
  
  Yes, everything is correct, then there will be Witte, Stolypin, Kolchak, Kornilov, Kerensky ........))))))
  
  You yourself answered your own question. Who owns the bowels, means of production, and minerals? THEN UNDER KINGS (emperors) the same thing happened
  
  Remember: Story - Oligarchic Capitalism
  For the sake of 300% profit, the capitalist goes for any crime
  1. Manul
    
    +1
    
    13 October 2015 16: 52
    
    Quote: Severomor
    Yes, everything is correct, then there will be Witte, Stolypin, Kolchak, Kornilov, Kerensky ........))))))
    
    You yourself answered your own question. Who owns the bowels, means of production, and minerals? THEN UNDER KINGS (emperors) the same thing happened
    
    Remember: Story - Oligarchic Capitalism
    For the sake of 300% profit, the capitalist goes for any crime
    
    What are you distorting? How can Stolypin be compared with Kerensky?
    1. Severomor
      
      +4
      
      13 October 2015 17: 02
      
      And why not Generalissimo Stalin, Marshal Rokossovsky
      
      Did I compare them?
      Although yes, I made a mistake - Witte, Stolypin on one side, Kornilov and Kerensky on the other))))
      
      PS But each ship has a chance to be called one of the parties))))
      1. Manul
        
        -1
        
        13 October 2015 21: 07
        
        Sorry, but you are terribly wrong. If earlier, I would challenge you to a duel. Now answer me in full here.
    2. Mareman Vasilich
      
      +9
      
      13 October 2015 17: 02
      
      He does not jerk. Both Stolypin and Kerensky served private capital, His Majesty liberalism, no matter which one. let them sit in different boats, but sail in the same direction. Our government will take any steps, just not to adopt the Soviet experience. The USSR cannot be returned, but its experience would be very useful now. But this would mean that everyone would be equal before the law and in society, and this is the worst nightmare of our government, the "elite", oligarchs, officials.
      1. Aleksey_K
        
        +5
        
        13 October 2015 18: 31
        
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        USSR does not return
        
        The USSR may not come back, but Socialism is a social system for every person, you can return. Only there is no such leader now, for whom the people would vote by 100%.
      2. Manul
        
        0
        
        13 October 2015 21: 08
        
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        Mareman Vasilich (3) Today, 17:02 ↑
        He does not jerk. Both Stolypin and Kerensky served private capital, His Majesty liberalism, no matter which one. let them sit in different boats, but sail in the same direction. Our government will take any steps, just not to adopt the Soviet experience. The USSR cannot be returned, but its experience would be very useful now. But this would mean that everyone would be equal before the law and in society, and this is the worst nightmare of our government, the "elite", oligarchs, officials.
        
        Stolypin was a brain and a statesman. Kerensky is an adventurer (I don’t want to blame anyone - they worked under completely different conditions. But if Stolypin succeeded, everything he planned was Russia would now dictate conditions on the whole planet. And Kerensky was a small prince, his emperor was dreaming).
        
        the polar
        
        0
        
        14 October 2015 08: 52
        
        Quote: Manul
        if Stolypin succeeded, all that he had planned -Russia would now dictate conditions on the whole planet. And Kerensky - the little prince, he was dreaming of the emperor).
        
        Come on, "professor of history", quickly enumerate what Stolypin was up to? What "works" have you read?
        But Kerensky, for your information, was ES-ER (a member of the Socialist Revolutionary Party) and promoted the program, a tyutelk in a tyutelka similar to Mr. Putin’s speeches. He was supported by the liberal middle class and large landowners such as the Rhodes, Lviv and Purishkevich
        
        Mareman Vasilich
        
        +1
        
        14 October 2015 10: 01
        
        Kerensky, like Trotsky, was an advocate of Anglo-Saxon capital. His task included the maximum possible destruction of the state. Stolypin also wanted to eat an egg and not to break an egg.
      3. Manul
        
        -1
        
        13 October 2015 21: 13
        
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        He does not jerk. Both Stolypin and Kerensky served private capital, His Majesty liberalism, no matter which one. let them sit in different boats, but sail in the same direction. Our government will take any steps, just not to adopt the Soviet experience. The USSR cannot be returned, but its experience would be very useful now. But this would mean that everyone would be equal before the law and in society, and this is the worst nightmare of our government, the "elite", oligarchs, officials.
        
        Change your face. I am against.
        PS And in general, admins, enter for granted - do not use the faces of great (historical) people as avatars. Even the professor is concerned.
      4. Sling cutter
        
        +3
        
        14 October 2015 02: 42
        
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        Mareman Vasilich
        
        I’m not only accepting, but sincerely by all means I support your position! +100500
  2. The comment was deleted.
2. Proud.
  
  0
  
  13 October 2015 19: 33
  
  Quote: Mareman Vasilich
  And why not Generalissimo Stalin, Marshal Rokossovsky, Marshal Zhukov, and so on. After all, the Romanov dynasty was already kissed on all sides. But everything Soviet is denigrated and forgotten.
  
  I agree. Although Rurikovich is possible. For the beginning. The name for Boreyev is: Ivan the Terrible. And the motto is: I can see right through you! " kamsa-so far dew ", or-" Crimea is ours! ".
3. Karabanov
  
  0
  
  13 October 2015 20: 34
  
  Quote: Mareman Vasilich
  And why not Generalissimo Stalin, Marshal Rokossovsky, Marshal Zhukov, and so on.
  
  Well, in our fleet the names of ships with worthy Soviet admirals are still preserved, the same TAKR “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov”. So future ships may wait for the names you proposed.
Crucian

+2

13 October 2015 15: 45

Quote: Old Siberian
A worthy name for a worthy weapon. The name of a peacemaker cannot be put to shame.

If you want peace, get ready for war! The more such submarines, there is more world in the world, sorry for the tautology.
Rattenfanger

+8

13 October 2015 15: 46

Alexander III is a worthy name for a "strategist". It is not for nothing that San Sanych went down in history as "the most Russian tsar".
Z.Y. It would be nice if the TARK or aircraft carrier in the future called Stalin. That would be fair.
Dima Čalevo

+2

13 October 2015 16: 00

A wonderful name!) Personally, I always wanted new boats to be named after the ships of the Russian Imperial Navy - "Glory", "Borodino", "Eagle", "Prince Suvorov", "Emperor Alexander III," Navarin "," Gangut ", "Retvizan", "Pallas", "Mercury" .. Still, continuity in the fleet is important, and the name of the ship should be passed on to future generations))
1. Nissa-on
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2015 16: 09
  
  In general, of course, it is time to build a harmonious system of naming ships. This was both in the Imperial Navy and in the USSR.
  With the "ampirer" of course the names were more impressive.
  
  PS Did you know that "Retvizan" is Swedish for "elephant"? ))))
  1. Alexey RA
    
    +1
    
    13 October 2015 16: 42
    
    Quote: Nissa-on
    In general, of course, it is time to build a harmonious system of naming ships. This was both in the Imperial Navy and in the USSR.
    
    And she was - this system? Here are the names of the same type (in the first approximation) of the Black Sea Fleet: “Catherine II”, “Chesma”, “Sinop” and “George the Victorious”. Empress, two sea victoria (Middle-earth and World Cup) and a saint.
    We take "Borodintsy": "Borodino", "Emperor Alexander III", "Eagle", "Prince Suvorov", "Glory".
2. Alexey RA
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2015 16: 34
  
  Quote: Dima Čalevo
  Personally, I always wanted new boats to be named after the ships of the Russian Imperial Navy - "Glory", "Borodino", "Eagle", "Prince Suvorov", "Emperor Alexander III," Navarin "," Gangut "," Retvizan ", "Pallas", "Mercury" ..
  
  "Eagle" is better not necessary ... "Eagles" have a bad fate.
  1. kote119
    
    +1
    
    13 October 2015 17: 42
    
    than the eagle did not please
    1. Alexey RA
      
      +1
      
      13 October 2015 18: 55
      
      Quote: kote119
      than the eagle did not please
      
      The first "Eagle" was captured by Stenka Razin. The latter lowered the flag and was handed over to the Japanese at Tsushima.
3. Rattenfanger
  
  +2
  
  13 October 2015 16: 54
  
  "Retvizan", "Mercury", "Pallas" are, of course, good. History is like -nothing. But the Soviet Navy will still be louder both in terms of assessment as a likely foe, and in names - "Admiral of the Soviet Union Fleet Nikolai Kuznetsov", "Marshal Shaposhnikov", "Admiral Vinogradov".
  Although the taste and color, as they say ...
Zai pali

0

13 October 2015 16: 11

Approved, just a class. Keep it up.
pts-m

+2

13 October 2015 16: 17

as they say in the people ... as they call, it will go with that name ...
Old26

+4

13 October 2015 16: 36

Quote: Mareman Vasilich
And why not Generalissimo Stalin, Marshal Rokossovsky, Marshal Zhukov, and so on.

If you paid attention, then all the names are political and military figures, but not later than the 19th century. So there won't be those suggested by you. It was in the USSR that the "admiral's" series could suddenly be diluted with "Marshal ..." or "Vasily Chapaev".

Quote: Алексей_К
The ship must carry a Name and Surname. Therefore "Kuzma Minin" is better.

The most likely name for boat # 8 will be "Mikhail Kutuzov" (as an option - "Field Marshal Kutuzov"). With a lesser degree of probability - "St. Nicholas" (rather vague name "). Moreover, it was originally planned to call the boat" Generalissimo Suvorov "-" Mikhail Kutuzov ", then" Prince Suvorov. "But as a result it was laid down as" Generalissimo Suvorov " ...

Quote: Vyacheslav73
Specialists - please explain what are the essential differences between the Borey and Borey-A projects ???

It will differ from the boats of Project 955 with some changes in equipment and weapons. As they say, instead of 8 bow TA will be 4, but onboard. The wheelhouse will not have a negative angle of inclination, the bow horizontal rudders will become wheelhouse due to the change in the location of the TA, the composition of the countermeasures will change. Instead of 6 x 533 mm disposable non-rechargeable launchers REPS-324 "Shlagbaum" for launching hydroacoustic countermeasures MG-104 "Brosok" or MG-114 "Beryl" there will be 6 x 533 mm disposable non-rechargeable launchers with SGAAPD "Last" and 2 x vertical launchers "Module-D"
The number of missiles will be the same as on project 955, that is 16

Quote: jaguar
The most important there will be 20 missiles, as opposed to 16 on the borea.

16 and none more. This was refuted in an interview with the director of PO "Sevmash" on 17.02.2013.
Maksus

+3

13 October 2015 16: 55

It is annoying that there is no system in the names of ships. Either Borey, then Dolgoruky, now Emperor Alexander3. Either in turn (in order of succession), or somehow by epochs. Where then is Rurik or Prophetic Oleg with Vsevolod the Big Nest.
1. Alexey RA
  
  +3
  
  13 October 2015 19: 08
  
  Quote: Maksus
  It is annoying that there is no system in the names of ships. Either Borey, then Dolgoruky, now Emperor Alexander3. Either in turn (in order of succession), or somehow by epochs. Where then is Rurik or Prophetic Oleg with Vsevolod the Big Nest.
  
  This is a special naval system - unsystematic.
  We have never had a system with the names of large ships. What's in the RIF, what's in the Soviet Navy. Even in the seemingly normal system of names of pr. 1143 "by cities" suddenly wedged in "Leonid Brezhnev" / "Kuznetsov".
  1. Rader
    
    +1
    
    13 October 2015 21: 09
    
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Quote: Maksus
    It is annoying that there is no system in the names of ships. Either Borey, then Dolgoruky, now Emperor Alexander3. Either in turn (in order of succession), or somehow by epochs. Where then is Rurik or Prophetic Oleg with Vsevolod the Big Nest.
    
    This is a special naval system - unsystematic.
    We have never had a system with the names of large ships. What's in the RIF, what's in the Soviet Navy. Even in the seemingly normal system of names of pr. 1143 "by cities" suddenly wedged in "Leonid Brezhnev" / "Kuznetsov".
    
    "You can't understand Russia with your mind" (c) But the fleet - even more so
TanakaKenshin

+2

13 October 2015 16: 56

My most respected Emperor is the All-Russian Emperor.
He did not like war, but he did not let his "sworn friends" escape. :)
Old26

+1

13 October 2015 17: 02

Quote: Maksus
It is annoying that there is no system in the names of ships. Either Borey, then Dolgoruky, now Emperor Alexander3. Either in turn (in order of succession), or somehow by epochs. Where then is Rurik or Prophetic Oleg with Vsevolod the Big Nest.

Boreas is the name of the project, not the personal name of the cruiser. Yuri Dolgoruky is the name of the head. And the rest - it is not at all necessary to give names in chronological order. And about the Prophetic Oleg .. There is a boat called "Prince Oleg". Which Oleg do you think this boat is named after?
1. Maksus
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2015 18: 24
  
  That's what I am talking about - if the project is Borey, then why not give names by the names of the winds (Samum, Khamsin, etc.), if the lead ship is a prince, then let the rest be princes, not Emperors and generals. Something like this.
  1. Disant
    
    +1
    
    13 October 2015 19: 57
    
    how they begin to stamp boats as sausages, then it will be as you wish ..
dosyl

+2

13 October 2015 17: 23

Quote: Petr1
And I would suggest calling it President Putin, what is the point of calling the boat the name of the long-dead king, let him be afraid of President Putin ...

Stoned, or what? The bream decided to throw the president? Putin is a humble man.
chunga-changa

+1

13 October 2015 18: 36

I thought they would make the TARKR "imperial", rename it after the repair - "Emperor Peter the First", "Emperor Alexander the First", "Emperor Alexander the Third", but that’s not bad either.
Interestingly, "Empress Catherine II" is the normal name for a battleship?)
1. Alexey RA
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2015 19: 04
  
  Quote: chunga-changa
  Interestingly, "Empress Catherine II" is the normal name for a battleship?)
  
  It’s quite normal.
  This name was used twice in the RIF "steam era":
  EBR "Ekaterina II": the first full-fledged EBR of the Black Sea Fleet, the lead in a series of 4 ships. The series was distinguished by a reinforced main battery - six 12 "guns in barbet mountings.
  LK "Empress Catherine the Great" (originally - "Catherine II"): the third LK of the "Empress Maria" type. He fought in WWI as part of the Black Sea Fleet.
roskot

+3

13 October 2015 19: 34

There would be ships, and the name - in our history of names is enough. And what names.
Old26

+1

13 October 2015 19: 41

Quote: chunga-changa
I thought they would make the TARKR "imperial", rename it after the repair - "Emperor Peter the First", "Emperor Alexander the First", "Emperor Alexander the Third", but that’s not bad either.

Most of all, sailors do not like renaming. All atomic ones have already changed their names once; Peter the Great already bears a third name. Do you want to cross him for the fourth time ???? In addition, two ships in the fleet do not have the same name. "Emperor Alexander III" is a boat ...
Old26

+1

13 October 2015 19: 47

Quote: Alexey RA
Even in the seemingly normal system of names of pr. 1143 "by cities" suddenly wedged in "Leonid Brezhnev" / "Kuznetsov".

Well, what can you do if we have always found fans to "bend". And so there was a harmonious system, especially for aircraft carriers and helicopter carriers:
-Moscow
Leningrad
-Kiev (construction was not carried out)
-Kiev
-Minsk
-Novorossiysk (laid as Kharkov)
-Baku
-Tbilisi
-Riga
-Ulyanovsk
And then the union fell apart and returned the names of Baku, Tbilisi, Riga was somehow not comme il faut
1. Alexey RA
  
  0
  
  14 October 2015 10: 01
  
  Quote: Old26
  Well, what can you do if we have always found fans to "bend". And so there was a harmonious system, especially for aircraft carriers and helicopter carriers:
  
  Yes, in the original version the system was.
  But here the question arises: why were these the largest ships of the fleet named after the system previously used to name the leaders of the destroyers?
  
  And "Kuznetsov" is a special article ... well it is necessary so that even on board the TAVKR there is not enough space to write the name of the ship in one line.
  Personal of His Imperial Highness Prince Kearn of the four golden banners of the name of the mountain eagle bomb carrier ... I remember the soldier was forced to memorize by heart ... Private such-and-such, name the personal bomb carrier of his Imperial Highness! And he used to call ... Yes ...
Parsec

+3

13 October 2015 20: 09

Quote: Nissa-on
PS Did you know that "Retvizan" is Swedish for "elephant"? ))))

No. Rattvisa in Swedish Justice, and elephant in Swedish elefant.
1. Pauls_77
  
  0
  
  14 October 2015 05: 49
  
  Good afternoon! As far as it is known, Retvizan is the name of an epic hero-hero in whose honor the battleship was named.
propolsky

+1

13 October 2015 20: 24

A worthy name in Russian history. Let them build, our history is rich in great names.
Vlad5307

+4

13 October 2015 20: 25

Quote: Baikonur
I would also mention Ivan the Terrible at naming!

It is time to call the names of people more modern to us, namely, the name of the undeservedly slandered I.V. Stalin, in the era of which Russia rebuilt its industry twice in 25 years, like a Phoenix bird from the fire! Then, adherents of Trotsky’s teachings ruined the USSR for 30 years of oblivion this great figure of the USSR. Our political opponents recognized this, while Gorbachev was awarded for the collapse of the USSR! No need to be afraid of your story, you need to be able to be proud of it, then no one will dare to groan and turn it around!
Homegoblin

+2

13 October 2015 20: 59

:))))))))))))))))))) I do not fight for the sake of, but maintain the status of "submariners"

1. A night special communications call woke the commander of the Caspian Flotilla.

- At the device! said the rear admiral, squinting at his watch.

“Igor Vladimirovich,” he heard in the pipe the cheerful voice of the Minister of Defense. - Do you still have rusty and non-flying Caliber missiles?

- These are the ones that fly a maximum of three hundred kilometers? - asked the commander.

- I got a joke! Well done! - answered Shoigu. - Listen to the battle order!

Having listened to the order, the rear admiral jumped into his tunic, looked at the photo, where he stood embracing the commanders of the Pacific and Northern fleets and smiled triumphantly:

- Well, Seryoga and Vovka? Who is "floating in shallow kayak"?

Five minutes later, the rocket ship of the 11661 Dagestan project made its first launches.

Ten minutes later, the frustrated Northern Fleet Commander called the Minister of Defense to allow him to support the Caspian sailors ’initiative by launching the Bulava from the Yuri Dolgoruky submarine-launched cruiser.

- One small start! - Admiral boomed. - One small such "Bulava" ...

- quit! - Shoigu decisively ordered, imagining a “small Mace” and shuddering. - The whole and united Syria in the region does not mean - Syria, the only surviving in the region. After all, there are still many different and original countries!

- Yes? - surprised the admiral. “It's just that I can't see the periscope from here, it's to blame!”

And by noon, the sailor of the rocket ship Arsen Muradov became an icon of the whole of Dagestan, as he managed to write on the cruise missile "Dagi - power!" Before launching

http://cont.ws/post/133066 - источниг (и полная версия "поржать")
dvina71

0

13 October 2015 21: 46

Quote: Polar
"While the Russian emperor is drinking, Russia can wait."
The next "Borey" is probably "Borya E." will be called so that "Alexander 3" is not bored.

Alexander 3 was certainly not an alcoholic, he loved to drink .. But it was he who carried out the reform of the army. And the navy began to receive armadillos under him. By the way, the reforms were very useful.
Starik72

+5

14 October 2015 02: 11

That Borey brought in great news !!! But his name was given to him, Tsarist Russia has not existed for almost 100 years, and YOU perpetuate kings who robbed and humiliated people. Better name Joseph Stalin, HE was the great leader of Great Russia - the USSR, and the greatest threat of capitalism and financial oligarchy. It's my opinion. And for this I expect a flurry of MINUSES! Yours faithfully ! Old Man 72.
1. Sling cutter
  
  +2
  
  14 October 2015 02: 15
  
  Quote: Starik72
  And for this I expect a flurry of MINUSES!
  
  Whose is that? catch +, get, sign!
  You wrote it right
2. Severomor
  
  +2
  
  14 October 2015 09: 09
  
  Quote: Starik72
  He was the great leader of Great Russia - the USSR, and the greatest thunderstorm of capitalism and the financial oligarchy.
  
  This is currently not possible.
  If the Red Army defeated Germany without the Commander-in-Chief, the name of the Chairman of the State Defense Committee is not mentioned at any parade, then what name of the ship could be discussed.
  1. Alexey RA
    
    0
    
    14 October 2015 18: 02
    
    Quote: Severomor
    If the Red Army defeated Germany without the Commander-in-Chief, the name of the Chairman of the State Defense Committee is not mentioned at any parade, then what name of the ship could be discussed.
    
    Wait, not all at once.
    First they returned the full name of the OMSDON - and began to call it again named after Dzerzhinsky.
    Then the full name of the 4th police department returned from nonexistence - named after Andropov. Ohhh ... how many screams were from the unworthy when she was so named at the parade.
    
    And there, you see, the matter will reach the Supreme Commander-in-Chief and the Chairman of the GKO. They depicted Lavrenty Pavlovich on a fresco at the station in Yekaterinburg:
    
    By the way, the one standing with its back to the audience is also well recognized - for, despite all the chronological inaccuracies, the scene is depicted of the famous: athletic best friend checks plutonium sphere heating.
YaMZ-238

-1

14 October 2015 09: 56

The next boat should be called Emperor Alexander II ... There was a worthy ruler! He deserved to have such a wonderful boat named after him.
1. Sergey S.
  
  -1
  
  15 October 2015 09: 11
  
  This is a joke?
  And then the name of the destroyer of the Great Fleet, created under Catherine, Alexander I?
  
  Ship names should be treated with caution, without political addiction.
  The sailors are moderately superstitious, and being in a storm with a political slogan on board is not what the Russian sailors deserve.
  
  And if the government changes, will we again first rename Molotov to Slava, and at the next turn, Slava to Moscow?
Vlad5307

0

14 October 2015 20: 39

Quote: Starik72
Better name Joseph Stalin, HE was the great leader of Great Russia - the USSR, and the greatest thunderstorm of capitalism and the financial oligarchy. It's my opinion. And for this I expect a flurry of MINUSES! Yours faithfully ! Old Man 72.

Do not be timid old man, break through!
Manul

+1

15 October 2015 00: 59

Eh, I forgot to say the most important thing. No one will read it already. And I would have put Alexander the Second higher than the Third. We’ll configure submarines for all the great ones, but the Second one really did hurt. When everyone is afraid of you, it’s possible to arrange a golden age. Without war. But you try to live without war, when there is no way without it ..

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"