Military Review

Su-34 front-line bombers will receive the functions of an electronic warfare aircraft

Vladimir Mikheev, Advisor to the First Deputy General Director of KRET, said that in 2015, the Radioelectronic Technologies concern (KRET, a member of Rostec) this year will transfer to the Russian Armed Forces the first batch of special containers, which make it possible for the Su-34 front-bomber to function as an electronic aircraft fight (EW).

Currently, Su-34 airplanes are used to attack the positions of militants of the Islamic State terrorist group (IS) banned in the Russian Federation in Syria.

“At the wing tips of all Su-34, multifunctional E-B systems Khibiny-10В are installed. This year, the Defense Ministry will receive the first batch of so-called stackable stackers installed under the fuselage, which will make it possible to turn a standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also ensure effective radio-electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, aircraft radar patrol and so on - that is, protection and other aircraft of the group ", - quotes Mikheev RIA"News».

Mikheev stressed that in this way the Su-34 can be used not only as a combat aircraft, but also be able to conduct electronic warfare.

"At the same time, the Su-34, used to conduct EW, will still be able to perform the function of a bomber," the agency source said.

The main purpose of the Khibiny multifunctional anti-missile system developed by KRET provides individual protection of aircraft against missile attacks by enemy fighters and ground-based air defense systems.
Photos used:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tatarus
    Tatarus 8 October 2015 07: 44 New
    Well, all the heat. From them and so swear all the "partners." Now I don’t even know how, whether they will survive. laughing

    That is, when the SU-34 is accompanied by a group of 24 or 25 EWs, everything is crushing? Did I understand correctly?
    1. vodolaz
      vodolaz 8 October 2015 07: 45 New
      Quote: Tatarus
      Well, all the heat. From them and so swear all the "partners." Now I don’t even know how, whether they will survive.

      This will increase the rotation of the crews of the American Navy))))
      1. hydrox
        hydrox 8 October 2015 08: 09 New
        Quote: vodolaz
        This will increase the rotation of the crews of the American Navy))))

        Which Navy in the middle of the desert?
        We are not flying in Ukraine, it is only there that submarines float in the steppes ...
        1. supertiger21
          supertiger21 8 October 2015 11: 15 New
          Correct solution! The duckling will be very useful for the presence of powerful electronic warfare stations. It would be nice to make even some specialized modification for these purposes, for example, the Su-34R. One can see some analogy with the American F-111 fighter-bomber, which also had a lateral arrangement of pilots in the cockpit, specialization in work on ground and surface targets, and even a separate modification of the E / F-111 for electronic warfare. If you look at the 34th and 111th, then even outwardly their cabs are very similar. I’m not to the fact that we licked it, but to the fact that, according to the positive experience of the Americans, we are doing everything right with Sushka.
    2. tlauicol
      tlauicol 8 October 2015 07: 54 New
      That's right .. just not all, but attacking anti-aircraft missiles .. but not all, but with the radar homing system and not around, but in the sector of 45 degrees forward / backward. about the range of action to mention or not to upset?
      Tell me, is it true that Abramovich won a million in the lottery? True, not only Abramovich, but Rabinovich, not into the lottery, but into cards, not a million, but a hundred rubles, and did not win, but lost
      1. Kubatai
        Kubatai 8 October 2015 08: 02 New
        Come on and range ..
        In any case, this increases the survivability of the aircraft, but this cannot but rejoice ..
      2. tlauicol
        tlauicol 8 October 2015 08: 05 New
        here it is more or less clearly written about the capabilities of Khibin and the group protection container
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. VoronoNoK
        VoronoNoK 8 October 2015 11: 57 New
        Well, why is it necessary to offend equipment of a built-up structure?) Its tasks are to provide group protection, which means the + -60 sector provides (AFAR, after all!) Yes, and the potential is such that not only the radar navigation system will burn out from the inside, but the AWACS with the IJIS will be nervous will smoke aside. Only here are 2 sides for the whole of Syria - it’s not enough. Two squadrons are needed, like those of the psy.d.dosov with their White Caresses, equipped with the F-18 "Growler". But here, IMHO, “Lever” with “Krasukha” to help us.))
    3. Just BB
      Just BB 8 October 2015 07: 54 New
      The 24th is already not offended by such gadgets (old, but "neat") - over there, like a "trough" scared in the Black Sea
  2. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 8 October 2015 07: 45 New
    We are quickly rearming, now the matter is in quantity.
  3. Kamchatsky
    Kamchatsky 8 October 2015 07: 45 New
    Multifunctionality - one of the features of a modern aircraft, probably will not hurt.
    1. Tatarus
      Tatarus 8 October 2015 07: 48 New
      Quote: Kamchatka

      also the conditions of survivability (survival) of the aircraft in battle.

      Quote: Kamchatka
      probably not hurt.

      Not prevent? Give 100
  4. andre
    andre 8 October 2015 07: 47 New
    I work in Novosib near the airfield, yesterday I heard Sushka take off, a terrible roar, however. Now we’ll run everything on NATE’s drones as well)) And I think it’s for 30 seconds that I flew into Turechina. A week of happiness, and then the Ukrainian topic is generally sick of it !!!
  5. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 8 October 2015 07: 47 New
    just t-xnumx some, not a plane
  6. 31rus
    31rus 8 October 2015 07: 48 New
    Everything is normal to deliver and experience, the conditions are excellent, Turkey, Israel, the USA, everything is close by, so the right thing
  7. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 8 October 2015 07: 51 New
    SU34 justifies the name of the many functional FBA aircraft.
  8. Penetrator
    Penetrator 8 October 2015 07: 52 New
    At the same time, the Su-34 used to conduct electronic warfare will still be able to serve as a bomber

    This is some kind of uberwaffe turns out! Found - blinded - struck. Three in one
  9. Wolka
    Wolka 8 October 2015 07: 52 New
    Well, just great, the Yankees go home ...
  10. kolkulon
    kolkulon 8 October 2015 07: 53 New
    Interesting. If you visit him everything for what he is intended, he will fly?)))
  11. Just BB
    Just BB 8 October 2015 07: 57 New
    Mikheev stressed that in this way the Su-34 can be used not only as a combat aircraft, but also be able to conduct electronic warfare.

    This is something fresh: - EW - this is peaceful action recourse
  12. Zomanus
    Zomanus 8 October 2015 08: 01 New
    Well, that’s the real test of our weapons.
    And now to a number of models we can attribute "there is experience in participating in real hostilities" ...
  13. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 8 October 2015 08: 15 New
    Amerikosy urgently need to bring, but the fact that there are few reports to write off write!
  14. ivan bogomolov
    ivan bogomolov 8 October 2015 08: 18 New
    New specialists are needed for new equipment, educational institutions should not be forgotten and revived, I think it is very important. soldier
  15. Dragon-y
    Dragon-y 8 October 2015 08: 22 New
    The most important thing is that he will be able to be both a "bomber" and a "rebel". Previously, separate aircraft were used for jamming, purely with equipment.
    1. Mangel olys
      Mangel olys 8 October 2015 08: 52 New
      Not certainly in that way. On the Bears, for example, were Azalea, Birch, Beech, etc.
  16. Engineer
    Engineer 8 October 2015 08: 43 New
    Duck has long had "Khibiny", and for him they did it, and with them he is already an EW plane.
  17. Black Colonel
    Black Colonel 8 October 2015 09: 10 New
    The Su-34 worked with Khibina on 08.08.08, when the characteristics of rodent radars were tracked to suppress (destroy) them.
  18. Vovan 73
    Vovan 73 8 October 2015 10: 10 New
    So this, in fact, has always been done this way. EW containers clung to serial machines and forth. Always when completing tasks, part of the machines stood out to suppress enemy stations, otherwise you will break through the fin. As a former startup of the EW IWB group I say
  19. thinker
    thinker 8 October 2015 10: 44 New
    “At the wingtips of all Su-34, multifunctional electronic warfare systems“ Khibiny-10V ”were installed.

    Here you can clearly see.
  20. iwakura
    iwakura 8 October 2015 11: 35 New
    Somehow it is not clear in the article it is written ...
    I understand the complex in the form of endings as in the photo given by the thinker, is somewhat different from the pendant.
    more powerful, designed for SU-34, but there is (or is still developing) an option for SU-24, but it occupies a place where you can hang an additional bomb / missile (and if it is a "very large" bomb, then it except in the center of the fuselage and can not be suspended), this option provides cover for the group. (name (may be mistaken) of the Khibiny-M type.)

    "cover" option, weaker, for, so to speak, individual protection (name Khibiny-10V)
  21. GSH-18
    GSH-18 8 October 2015 15: 48 New
    Su-34 front-line bombers will receive the functions of an electronic warfare aircraft

    Great news! good
  22. gukoyan
    gukoyan 8 October 2015 19: 08 New
    Great, here they got new things)