Military Review

The air defense system of the Central District began rearmament on the Triumph air defense system

32
In the Central Military District, the re-equipment of the Novosibirsk air defense compound to the C-400 “Triumph” commenced, RIA News message of the district press service.




“The C-400 air defense system is an order of magnitude better than its predecessor C-300 in terms of a larger coverage area and the defeat of various air attack targets,” the release said.

It is also reported that "positions have already been equipped to accommodate new complexes, military personnel in the combat crews have been retrained at the Gatchina training center for anti-aircraft missile forces of the Air Force."

Photos used:
http://interpolit.ru/, http://ria.ru/
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. fregina1
    fregina1 6 October 2015 09: 30 New
    +7
    Replace all C 300 systems! One to one, and do not believe those who say that one C400 system replaces several C 300! Change everything is the same or just increase! Powerful anti-aircraft defense, the basis for being afraid to climb! By the way, they could send one complex to Syria for testing! With the guard!
    1. makst83
      makst83 6 October 2015 09: 42 New
      +10
      The C-400 system is the most effective medication, such a vaccine, against the permissive virus, from the side of our "partners" and "sworn friends"! And the more there will be (complexes), the less desire there will be to interfere in our internal affairs!
      P.S. history has shown that an effective air defense system is VERY STRONGLY hindering the promotion of democracy and other people's will! soldier
      1. maxim1987
        maxim1987 6 October 2015 12: 13 New
        +2
        Quote: makst83
        P.S. history has shown that an effective air defense system is VERY STRONGLY hindering the promotion of democracy and other people's will!


        I never thought that the USSR had poor air defense
        1. krot
          krot 6 October 2015 18: 02 New
          0
          Well, they got to us, finally! +
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Nik_One
      Nik_One 6 October 2015 10: 04 New
      +2
      One to one no one plans to change. The replacement for the S-300 will be the S-350.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 6 October 2015 10: 59 New
        -1
        The replacement for the S-300 will be the S-350.

        God forbid angry
    3. WKS
      WKS 6 October 2015 10: 25 New
      +5
      Quote: fregina1
      By the way, one complex could be sent to Syria for testing! With the guard!

      And on whom to test it? For Israeli, Turkish or Amer’s purposes? IG aircraft and other flying things are not yet available.
      1. Byshido_dis
        Byshido_dis 6 October 2015 10: 31 New
        +1
        Well, how is it no purpose? And Turkish planes bombing Kurds in Syria?
        1. Nik_One
          Nik_One 6 October 2015 10: 35 New
          +4
          Do you offer Russia to shoot down Turkish planes using the S-400?
          1. Dembel77
            Dembel77 6 October 2015 11: 24 New
            0
            This is our answer to any potential aggressor. Our Bear is not toothless!
  2. Yarik
    Yarik 6 October 2015 09: 31 New
    +3
    Good news! More such news!
  3. vovanpain
    vovanpain 6 October 2015 09: 35 New
    +8
    This news is really good.
  4. chikenous59
    chikenous59 6 October 2015 09: 37 New
    +1
    Quote: Yarik
    Good news! More such news!

    Why do not you write this comment in every news?
    1. Gumma
      Gumma 6 October 2015 10: 07 New
      +3
      Colonel, do not spam with answers-questions
  5. abrakadabre
    abrakadabre 6 October 2015 09: 41 New
    +5
    Interesting. The performance characteristics indicate that the complex can accompany (attack on the control unit) 300 and attack (if there is an appropriate BC) 72 targets simultaneously. Moreover, the standard set of 12 launchers of 4 rockets. That is 48 missiles.
    This means that the system cannot be used at full capacity for ammunition.
    Can anyone give a detailed explanation on this?

    Does this mean that it is possible to connect a double-triple set of controllers to one central control unit?
    Or is it that this way the system is protected from information overload during a massive impact?
    Or that the reserve capacities are used to transmit data / duplicate (in case of defeat) the control centers of neighboring divisions, where the ammunition has not yet been exhausted?
    1. remy
      remy 6 October 2015 11: 57 New
      0
      in general, everything is something like this:
      The S-400 air defense system is interfaced with the Nebo-ME radar and the ACS of Polyana D4M, which selects and tracks up to 500 targets and issues a TsU of 250.
      - Nowadays, anti-radar missiles are very widely used to suppress air defense systems of air defense systems.
      - There is a duplication of the radar: division, regiment, brigade.
      So to reduce to zero the combat potential of the air defense system of the division, the regiment will not work, because All the same, they will receive the CI from third-party funds in the event of the withdrawal of their own radar and ACS.
      1. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 6 October 2015 12: 27 New
        0
        Thank you very much for the clarification. So my guesses about the purpose of the excess power of the division's control center were correct.
  6. Zomanus
    Zomanus 6 October 2015 09: 43 New
    +1
    And I'm waiting for C-350.
    Still, 12 missiles on the launcher are better than 4.
    Although each system is tailored for its tasks, so there is no point in arguing here.
    C-400 alone also cannot work fully.
    So there most likely the complex will be put on duty.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 6 October 2015 10: 55 New
      +2
      And I'm waiting for C-350.
      Still, 12 missiles on the launcher are better than 4.

      Better, but what kind of rockets are there? 9m96m with a range of 120-150 km and a warhead weight of 24 kg? Such missiles climb into the S-400 launcher, four pieces instead of one 48n6 / 40n6 - a total of 16 pieces.
      hi
      1. Lenivets
        Lenivets 6 October 2015 21: 28 New
        0
        "9m96m with a range of 120-150 km and a warhead weight of 24 kg? Such missiles also climb into the S-400 launchers"

        Yeah, they climb, but only the S-400 is an order of magnitude more expensive and, accordingly, they will be an order of magnitude less in the troops. wink
        Maybe you do not need to replace one with another?
        If there is a need for medium-range systems, it is better to buy 10 S-350s than one S-400 (a distant system, but with the ability to push a missile from the middle one there). hi
  7. lopvlad
    lopvlad 6 October 2015 09: 51 New
    +3
    Quote: fregina1
    Replace all C 300 systems!


    do not rush. The military version (designed to directly cover troops located near the enemy primarily from ballistic missiles and aircraft and also various other targets) the S-400 still does not exist and apparently will not. But the military version of the S-300V is constantly it is being modernized and undergoing tests (already the S-300V4 variant).
    1. Nik_One
      Nik_One 6 October 2015 10: 02 New
      +5
      For the military version of the S-400, the modification of the S-300V4 can be conditionally taken. Their characteristics are approximately equal.
  8. Rossiyanin
    Rossiyanin 6 October 2015 10: 03 New
    +1
    Good news and scary for our "partners" news.
  9. gispanec
    gispanec 6 October 2015 10: 10 New
    +1

    It is also reported that “positions have already been equipped to accommodate the new complexes, the military personnel have undergone retraining as part of combat crews at the Gatchina Training Center Air Force anti-aircraft missile forces. "

    is it on the basis of the LVVPU air defense named after Yu.V. Andropov? .... a good school was ....
  10. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 6 October 2015 10: 12 New
    +1
    And removed from duty C 300 put in Syria.
  11. viktor_ui
    viktor_ui 6 October 2015 10: 27 New
    +1
    "An order of magnitude superior to the S-300" - this is already 10 times !!! This is 1:10. It's true ?
    1. Nik_One
      Nik_One 6 October 2015 10: 32 New
      +3
      no, not at 10. just sometimes not everyone knows what it means "an order of magnitude" and write it for beauty)))
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz 6 October 2015 10: 56 New
      0
      "An order of magnitude superior to the S-300" - this is already 10 times !!! It's 1:10

      Greetings fizmat! hi
  12. silver169
    silver169 6 October 2015 10: 29 New
    +1
    Good news. The S-400 is even impressive in the picture. Rather, they would rearm. For former "friends / partners" immediately arrogance will decrease.
  13. roskot
    roskot 6 October 2015 10: 36 New
    +3
    We all have our own answer.
  14. Wiruz
    Wiruz 6 October 2015 10: 58 New
    0
    Why do they write that the range of aerodynamic targets at the “four hundred” is 250 km? Is everything so bad with 40n6? It seems that they have already taken it into service, and put it on the conveyor ...
    request
  15. lopvlad
    lopvlad 6 October 2015 11: 14 New
    +1
    Quote: Nik_One
    For the military version of the S-400, the modification of the S-300V4 can be conditionally taken.


    you can take anything. Only from this the reality does not change and the reality is that there is no military version of the S-400 and is not expected.
    Since there is no military analogue to the existing S-300V4, the S-300V4 systems will be in service for many years to come.

    The S-350 will not be a full replacement for the S-300. The S-350 is a cheap alternative (cheaper missiles are used which are enough to control the sky in the military version). As for the characteristics, the characteristics of the third Buk being developed are close to the characteristics of the S-350.

    There is always a difference in characteristics, otherwise no one will rivet many complexes for the same task. Universality requires sacrificing some characteristics that can be very important in a war.
    1. Nik_One
      Nik_One 7 October 2015 01: 21 New
      0
      Quote: lopvlad
      Since there is no military analogue to the existing S-300V4, the S-300V4 systems will be in service for many years to come.

      Of course they will. Moreover, the S-300B4 began to enter service later than the S-400. I repeat once again that their characteristics are approximately equal.
      As well, however, the characteristics of the S-350 and Buk-M3 are equal, as you correctly noted.
      Quote: lopvlad
      S-350 will not be a full replacement for S-300. S-350 is a cheap alternative

      It depends on what to compare with, the S-350 will come to replace the old S-300PS.
  16. Bayun
    Bayun 6 October 2015 11: 43 New
    0
    Are PBUs with peripherals already on the wireless or cables, like the old ones, are pulling? It’s also interesting if the PU box is capable of fighting on its own? Although, God forbid, we do not have to apply them with all the tactical tricks; and for "friends" this is military marketing.
  17. The comment was deleted.