Military Review

Admiral: Russian Black Sea Fleet can be used to blockade the coast of Syria

58
Ships of the Black Sea fleet can be used to block the Syrian coast and, it is possible, to launch artillery strikes, reports RIA News opinion of the head of the Duma defense committee, former commander of the Black Sea Fleet, admiral Vladimir Komoyedov.




“As to the large-scale use of the Black Sea Fleet in this operation, I think this will not happen, but from the point of view of the blockade of the coast, I think that is fine. Artillery strikes are not excluded, the ships are ready for this, but there is no point in this yet - the terrorists are in the depths, there is no artillery to get there. ”- said the agency Komoyedov.

According to him, "the size of the fleet group involved in the operation will depend on the intensity of the hostilities." “At the moment, the forces of the Mediterranean Flotilla are enough for effective actions in this sector,” the admiral noted.

He added that "support vessels will certainly be involved in operations against ISIS, which will deliver certain material and technical means and ammunition."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 5 October 2015 17: 26 New
    18
    Well, not only can it be used, but it will be used. Moscow has already pulled itself up, and this is the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet. Yes, and to dare uninvited guests in the form of all kinds of Cooks and other visitors.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 5 October 2015 17: 30 New
      15
      Let's fuck if that ....!
      1. Arh
        Arh 5 October 2015 17: 42 New
        +5
        There would still be attack helicopters Ka-52 and Mi-28 !!!!
        1. Penetrator
          Penetrator 5 October 2015 18: 26 New
          +5
          Quote: Arh
          There would still be attack helicopters Ka-52 and Mi-28 !!!!

          Do you think that they are not there? I don’t take part in air strikes, I agree, but they already carry out reconnaissance of distant approaches to the air base.
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 5 October 2015 18: 42 New
        12
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Let's fuck if that ....!

        Spread this video ...HOW ABOUT NOW SONG! drinks
    2. katalonec2014
      katalonec2014 5 October 2015 17: 33 New
      +3
      The Russian Spring reports that opposition militants are asking Russia for weapons to fight ISIS.
      1. jjj
        jjj 5 October 2015 17: 40 New
        +8
        Isn't that what Mistral needed for this?
        A little off topic, on aviation. In the middle of last week, "liberal experts" said that Russia could come into conflict with NATO, through infringing on the possibility of the Turkish Air Force. Today we see that Turkey, and then NATO, are warning our aviation against attempts to "violate NATO airspace." Smells like a ready-made provocation
        1. Peterhof 73
          Peterhof 73 5 October 2015 17: 46 New
          +2
          In the subject, in the subject. Now everything is in topic. All would be nothing, but something alarming. We’re striding so broadly that we wouldn’t break our pants. (No panic)
          1. Baikonur
            Baikonur 5 October 2015 17: 51 New
            0
            Do not drift!

            VKSily Greet the Navy!
            Maybe the Grounds will catch up (also officially)!

            All Ours Will Be Glad -
            Hit us together
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Dart2027
          Dart2027 5 October 2015 19: 05 New
          +2
          Quote: jjj
          Isn't that what Mistral needed for this?

          I recall all kinds of experts who asked:
          “Why? We have a defensive doctrine!”
    3. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 5 October 2015 17: 36 New
      10
      Normul, as taught, both from land and from the sea! Again, until the 6th Yankees fleet returns from the Belorussian Sea, where the Psaki sent him, we’ll do all the work. Catch the Obama, he was called exceptional - that’s Russia and expelled you! negative
    4. morozik
      morozik 5 October 2015 17: 36 New
      59
      ___________________
      1. Kos_kalinki9
        Kos_kalinki9 5 October 2015 18: 25 New
        +7
        Quote: morozik
        ___________________
    5. Penetrator
      Penetrator 5 October 2015 18: 22 New
      +3
      Quote: NEXUS
      Moscow has already pulled itself up, and this is the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet.

      Tschemta, “Moscow” planned to put on modernization. But, apparently, the situation is such that not before.
    6. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 5 October 2015 18: 36 New
      +3
      Black Sea Fleet enters the battle soldier
      1. Seaman77
        Seaman77 5 October 2015 20: 09 New
        +4
        RK Moscow is certainly great, so big, beautiful, but in my opinion small, but very "polite" Buyan-M with Onyx would be more suitable there ...

        Say expensive Onyx for the broads ..?

        But experience is priceless ... You can try.
  2. Ross_ulair
    Ross_ulair 5 October 2015 17: 29 New
    16
    The most important thing is to cover the coast from the persistent Yankees, everywhere sticking their shabby tail.
    And also the creation of a dome over Syria, so that no flying Amer’s vessel dares to poke around.
    Well, the cover of our transport routes - front-line logistics must be reliably protected!
  3. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 5 October 2015 17: 30 New
    +4
    But to drive away all sorts of uninvited guests - easily!
  4. Cananecat
    Cananecat 5 October 2015 17: 30 New
    0
    The question is ... and what are the Chinese pulling into Syria? Run-in equipment or will they still take part in ground-based databases?
    1. Peterhof 73
      Peterhof 73 5 October 2015 17: 48 New
      +9
      The Chinese, as always, customize only their ancient Confucian theory. They are too ancient.
  5. kil 31
    kil 31 5 October 2015 17: 31 New
    +2
    He added that “auxiliary ships will be involved in the operation against ISIS, which will deliver certain material and technical means and ammunition” What kind of conversation is this “for sure” they will run, it’s not expensive to carry the BTA.
  6. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 5 October 2015 17: 32 New
    +5
    Yes. The fleet has already done a great job. God willing - will not fail.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 5 October 2015 17: 36 New
      +4
      Quote: x.andvlad
      Yes. The fleet has already done a great job. God willing - will not fail.

      Our sailors are no worse than birds. And they haven’t said their word yet. But I think when they say that ISIS will not break into neighboring countries, but to the north pole, tell the bears about their caliphate.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 5 October 2015 17: 42 New
        10
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: x.andvlad
        Yes. The fleet has already done a great job. God willing - will not fail.

        Our sailors are no worse than birds. And they haven’t said their word yet. But I think when they say that ISIS will not break into neighboring countries, but to the north pole, tell the bears about their caliphate.

        I think so too .... They beat mother do not worry ..! They will beat me on a dalnyak, with the support of the VKS! Good luck everyone!
      2. arane
        arane 5 October 2015 18: 53 New
        +5
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: x.andvlad
        Yes. The fleet has already done a great job. God willing - will not fail.

        Our sailors are no worse than birds. And they haven’t said their word yet. But I think when they say that ISIS will not break into neighboring countries, but to the north pole, tell the bears about their caliphate.

        Well, that’s unlikely, the Russians are already waiting for them .....
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 5 October 2015 18: 55 New
          +3
          Quote: arane
          Well, that’s unlikely, the Russians are already waiting for them .....

          So I say, BEARS TELL! wink drinks
  7. maxim1987
    maxim1987 5 October 2015 17: 33 New
    +8
    Artillery strikes are not ruled out, the ships are ready for this, but there’s no sense yet - the terrorists are in the depths, there’s no way to get artillery there, "

    Wait lovers of battleships will begin: they say we talked laughing
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 5 October 2015 19: 08 New
      0
      Quote: maximNNX
      Wait lovers of battleships will begin: they say we talked

      Unfortunately yes. It is clear that equipping a ship with guns instead of missiles is stupid. But one or two cannons of normal caliber can be delivered.
      1. Peterhof 73
        Peterhof 73 6 October 2015 12: 17 New
        0
        Unfortunately yes. It is clear that equipping a ship with guns instead of missiles is stupid. But one or two guns of normal caliber can be put. [/ Quote]

        And what is a normal caliber? We have on "SARYCH" (pr.956) in the head of my warhead-2 two AK-130s. Who is not in the know - twin trunks 130 mm. So when this fool was craving, the “box” was deployed on the course. The impression of hoo. But the effective firing range is so-so (to cover the landing, still yes) And if we put in more caliber, then our steamer would only collapse at the salvo when it was salvo.
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 8 October 2015 22: 56 New
          0
          Quote: Petergofsky73
          And what is a normal caliber?

          For modern self-propelled guns, 152 mm is already much better. In the Great Patriotic War there were “Stalin's Hammers” with a caliber of 203 mm - I don’t know how at 956, but at 1164 it was quite possible to shove it.
          Quote: Petergofsky73
          then our steamer would only fall apart in a salvo

          So it was designed and relying on a gun of a certain caliber. If it was supposed to put the gun more seriously, then the TK would be different in strength
  8. Beaver
    Beaver 5 October 2015 17: 33 New
    11
    It is good that Russia has a Black Sea Fleet. And a naval base in the Crimea. By linking everything into one chain, you are amazed - this is directly aerobatics of strategic planning. The sight of such a well-thought-out political game is simply breathtaking. good
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 6 October 2015 09: 15 New
      -1
      I would like the new ships to stand off the coast of Syria, like frigates 11356, and ideally 22350. And strategic planning, which did not take into account the disruption of orders for engines, and with the Mistrals, so we still have to send a fleet of Soviet production.
  9. roskot
    roskot 5 October 2015 17: 36 New
    +3
    So the fleet entered the business. It will not be fair for the Americans to poke their nose into the waters of our ships.
  10. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 5 October 2015 17: 39 New
    +8
    Quite possibly. Now in our region
    GRK "Moscow" left September September 24, passed September 25 Bosphorus

    TFR "smart" left Sevastopol 18 September

    TFR "Ladny" and RCA "Р-109" left 23 of September, passed Bosphorus of 24 of September


    It is possible that RKVP "Samum", 1239 Ave, and Mirage Miri Ave.
    The Mirazh small rocket ship and the Samum missile hovercraft on Friday, October 2, left the berth of the Navy base in Sevastopol and left the city water area.

    http://flot.com/2015/Поход83/



    This is not counting the BDK involved in the "Syrian express"
    1. katalonec2014
      katalonec2014 5 October 2015 17: 48 New
      +1
      The affair with us is clear, but what the NATO members are in opposition to, so to speak, to demonstrate strength.
      1. Roman 1977
        Roman 1977 5 October 2015 18: 18 New
        +5
        Quote: katalonec2014
        The affair with us is clear, but what the NATO members are in opposition to, so to speak, to demonstrate strength.

        As always, the US 6 fleet: more 40 surface ships, including 2 aircraft carrier, 2-4 nuclear submarines, 175 aircraft and 21000 military personnel.
        Incomplete list of ships
        1. Headquarters amphibious assault ship (LCC) Mount Whitney

        2. Anzio missile cruiser

        3. Cruiser Philippine Sea (CG 58).
        4. The destroyer "USS Higgins" (DDG 76)

        5. Landing ship "USS Ashland" (LSD-48)
        7. USS Ramage Destroyer (DDG-61)
        8. USS Truxtun Destroyer (DDG 103)
        Well, plus the little things a few Englishmen, as well as if the French Navy intervenes (nuclear aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, 6 PLA type Rubis, 11 destroyers, 11 frigates, 20 patrol ships, 3 UDC, 2 TDK), Italy (2 light aircraft carriers with Harriers, 7 DEPL, 18 frigates and destroyers, 15 patrol ships, Spain (1 RCA), well, I would add the Israeli Navy here (3 corvette, 11 ESPL, 23 RCA)
        1. katalonec2014
          katalonec2014 5 October 2015 18: 28 New
          +3
          Yes, especially not borzeze!
          1. Roman 1977
            Roman 1977 5 October 2015 19: 17 New
            +1
            Quote: katalonec2014
            Yes, especially not borzeze!

            The Syrian Navy in itself does not represent any serious force and is composed of:
            -2 TFR pr. 159АE transferred to 1969 and 1976 yy .. without rocket armament, of which at least one Al Hirasa 2-508 is not on the move

            -10-20 missile boats of 205 Ave. (5-8 РКА Ave. 205У and 5-12 РКА Ave 205ЭР),

            - 8 patrol boats of the Grif Ave. 1400ME,

            -3-10 Tir II patrol boats (IPS 18) of Iranian construction (with rocket armament)

            -6 Iranian-built MIG-S-1800 patrol boats

            -1 MTSH pr. 266M
            -1 BTSHCH pr. 1265 (most likely not on the move)
            -3-5 RTsch pr 1258
            -3 KFOR pr. 771 Polish construction

            In 1985-1987. Syria has been transferred to 3 DEPL Ave 633, however, at present they are not on the move and stand on the base in Tartus, waiting for the butchering.
          2. Roman 1977
            Roman 1977 5 October 2015 19: 17 New
            +3
            Quote: katalonec2014
            Yes, especially not borzeze!

            Theoretically, I emphasize this, in theory, Iran may be of some help:
            - 3 DEPL Ave 877

            - 1 "destroyer" (actually a light frigate) "Jamaran". Based on the English frigate Vosper Mk5. Displacement - 1420 t. Length - 94,5 m, width - 11,1 m, draft - 3,25 m. EI - 2 GTU (20000 hp), 4 diesel generator (4 XX550 kV). Speed ​​- 28 knots Crew - 120-140 people. Armament: 4X1 PU C-802 or 4 HY-2, AXWXXXUM NXXXXUM, XNQXX 1 4 X-NEXX1 1 76 27 1 1 40 40 2 1 B20, 01x2 3-mm TA. VPPl for Bell 324ASW helicopter

            - 3 lightweight frigate Vosper Mk.5 English built 1967-1972. Displacement-1250 / 1540 t. For the Iranian Navy. Length - 94,5 m, width - 11,07 m, draft - 3,25 m. EI - two-shaft, 2 GTU Rolls-Royce Olympus TM-3A (46000 hp), 2 diesel Paxman Ventura. (3800 hp). Speed ​​- 39 knots Navigation range - 5000 / 15. Crew - 125-146 people. Arms: 4X1 PU control systems C-802 1996 98-mm machine gun, 1x114 8-mm TA.

            - 2 patrol ships of type Vayandor-American built 60-ies. Upgraded in Iran. They were installed 2x2 RCC "Noor" or "Ghader", 76-mm AU Fajr-27, 1 x 2 40-mm Fath-40, 2 x 1 20-mm AU, was overhauled the main power plant of the ship and .d
            Why theoretically? Because everything will depend on the position of Egypt, whether it will let the Iranian ships pass through the Suez Canal, since such light ships are unlikely to go around Africa. And the experience of such long voyages of the Iranian sailors is not available. For the same reason, I do not take into account the numerous Iranian light RCA and mini-PL. By their own turn, they will not reach, or carry on transport ships or by land, through Iraq and the Syrian territories controlled by ISIS ...
            1. Peterhof 73
              Peterhof 73 6 October 2015 12: 31 New
              +1
              I agree with you in the wording "purely theoretically." I’m just sure that I don’t have to wait for any help (I emphasize any) from the cunning Persians. As well as from the Chinese, Romanians, Bulgarians, Aleuts, etc. Climbed so climbed. We’ll hang around ourselves. By the way, the 6th fleet of the US Navy is far from an amusing flotilla. You + for a visual demonstration.
        2. skeket
          skeket 5 October 2015 20: 25 New
          +2
          Of course, one Black Sea Fleet will not survive if the Allies roll all over (this is just the answer for those cormorants who are skeptical about the priority strengthening of the Black Sea Fleet)
          If you smell fried, you will have to transfer Tu-22, X-22 to the suspension and into the air in Crimea ...
        3. remy
          remy 5 October 2015 23: 02 New
          0
          USA for artillery strikes have battleships! true in the form of "museums" but! Al 7 pieces!

          and we have only one cruiser Kutuzov in Novorossiysk.

          - in the photo Battleship type Sevastopol
    2. Peterhof 73
      Peterhof 73 5 October 2015 17: 52 New
      0
      Well, Mirage already has combat experience if-what. It was thought, but if ISIS will decide to evacuate by sea? What then? To drown, not to drown?
      1. Rostovchanin
        Rostovchanin 5 October 2015 18: 01 New
        +2
        + Nobody knows how many of our submarines are running there, and they are there 100% ... Novorossiysk, after the inter-naval transition, I think it will catch up there too, Rostov-on-Don will also go there soon.
        1. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn 6 October 2015 09: 21 New
          0
          Quote: Rostovchanin
          + Nobody knows how many of our submarines are running there, and they are there 100% ... Novorossiysk, after the inter-naval transition, I think it will catch up there too, Rostov-on-Don will also go there soon.
          Well, the only submarine there in the ranks as part of the Black Sea Fleet is Novorossiysk, 100%! What is there to build castles in the air, read the composition of the Black Sea Fleet, damn it.
    3. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 5 October 2015 17: 56 New
      +7
      An SSV-231 reconnaissance vessel, Vasily Tatishchev, is sent to Syria from the Baltic. Its tasks include: Radio interception of communication channels at all frequencies.
      Relay of closed communication channels.
      Telemetry intelligence.
      Radio intelligence - determining the ownership and characteristics of radio emission sources.
      Identification and systematization of sources of electromagnetic radiation.
      Measurements of physical fields.
      Drawing up acoustic and electromagnetic "portraits" of ships and submarines.
      Control of maritime communications.
      Fixing the movement of ships of a potential enemy.
      Observation of artillery firing and missile launches. In addition to their specific tasks, they also love to COUNT laughing
  11. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 5 October 2015 17: 45 New
    19
    “At the moment, the forces of the Mediterranean flotilla are enough for effective action in this area,” said the admiral
    That's right, enough, but not enough, add as much as necessary. And as I understand it, to solve any problem.
  12. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 5 October 2015 17: 48 New
    14
    It is necessary to slow down tankerochki and ask, otkel oil? Present tugomenty! And then, panimash, their business.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  13. AIR-ZNAK
    AIR-ZNAK 5 October 2015 18: 01 New
    +2
    Quote: armored optimist
    It is necessary to slow down tankerochki and ask, otkel oil? Present tugomenty! And then, panimash, their business.

    Well, yes, tankers should stop all of the oil in one exported Turkish pipe. How can it be divided into molecules from the IG and this official?
    1. Armored optimist
      Armored optimist 5 October 2015 19: 09 New
      +2
      To interrupt by accident.
      1. ssn18
        ssn18 5 October 2015 19: 35 New
        +1
        These are not our methods. laughing
  14. 79807420129
    79807420129 5 October 2015 18: 09 New
    10
    Quote: Canecat
    The question is ... and what are the Chinese pulling into Syria? Run-in equipment or will they still take part in ground-based databases?

    China will abstain in the UN. Hope only on the Syrian army, Iran will help quietly.
    1. prostofily
      prostofily 5 October 2015 18: 21 New
      -1
      China will tell its murr when necessary.
  15. PValery53
    PValery53 5 October 2015 18: 17 New
    +1
    The heading should clarify: "for the blockade of the Syrian coast" - "in the interests of Syria!"
  16. plotnikov561956
    plotnikov561956 5 October 2015 18: 39 New
    +1
    Only a private person can say such things ... The Navy does its job perfectly even without firing ...
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 5 October 2015 23: 30 New
      +1
      Quote: plotnikov561956
      Only a private person can say such things ..
      Komoyedov V.P. is not a private person. He is chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee, admiral, former commander of the Black Sea Fleet.
  17. Maksus
    Maksus 5 October 2015 18: 46 New
    +3
    And I liked this passage here: "the ships are ready for art support, but the enemy is still in the depths of the territory." This "so far" sounds very promising)))
  18. Old26
    Old26 5 October 2015 18: 55 New
    0
    Quote: armored optimist
    It is necessary to slow down tankerochki and ask, otkel oil? Present tugomenty!

    And this is called a blockade and can only be carried out with the approval of the UN. We ourselves have no right to delay and verify.

    Quote: Rostovchanin
    + Nobody knows how many of our submarines are running there, and they are there 100% ... Novorossiysk, after the inter-naval transition, I think it will catch up there too, Rostov-on-Don will also go there soon.

    And you can find out what the submarine fleet will give in the fight against ISIS?

    Quote: maximNNX
    Artillery strikes are not ruled out, ships are ready for this

    Ready then maybe ready, but what is there? One spark of a 130-mm AA at Moscow, one twin of a 76 mm at Ladny, one single-barrel at R-109 RPA, at Samum RKVP pr. 1239 and Mirage
    That's the whole artillery of the naval group. All missiles on the above - ANTI-PORTABLE, so it’s impossible to strike at ISIS with rockets either. Rather, the presence of Russian ships is a symbol of how combat units they are unsuitable in the fight against ISIS ...







    This is not counting the BDK involved in the "Syrian express"
    1. skeket
      skeket 5 October 2015 20: 36 New
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      That's the whole artillery of the naval group. All of the missiles on the above are ANTI-shipable, so it’s impossible to strike missiles at ISIS. Rather, the presence of Russian ships is a symbol of how combat units they are unsuitable in the fight against ISIS ...

      and no one hides the purpose of the fleet off the coast of Syria. It was clearly said that the fleet would cover the sky of Syria from the sea, and ships and boats with anti-ship missiles, just the same, to cool the hot heads.
      1. Arseny
        Arseny 5 October 2015 23: 07 New
        0
        Only Moscow can cover the sky, only Moscow has artillery suitable for firing at coastal targets (and even that has one tower or two 130 barrels). Modern ships are not designed for this, and the ammunition load for this is small.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 6 October 2015 00: 01 New
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      Rather, the presence of Russian ships is a symbol of how combat units they are unsuitable in the fight against ISIS ...

      Volodya, hello. Your koment correct and balanced. I do not agree with one.
      Ships are not a symbol, but a demonstration of intentions. Liaolin also seems to have entered Tartus and RKR with him. And this is serious: the Russian Federation and China are together ... Here, NATO will also think about how to behave ...
      Then, cash forces announce the launch of the Kyrgyz Republic and missiles - and that’s it: no one will trample in this area. And if he lodges, he can get a "gift" on board ... So then - he is to blame. And who wants to receive this?
  19. Welcome to hell
    Welcome to hell 5 October 2015 19: 05 New
    +1
    Quote: Penetrator
    Quote: Arh
    There would still be attack helicopters Ka-52 and Mi-28 !!!!

    Do you think that they are not there? I don’t take part in air strikes, I agree, but they already carry out reconnaissance of distant approaches to the air base.

    there are mi-24 at the bases in Syria, there was no information on the ka-52 and mi-28, but we have very few of these machines since we have only just begun to put them in the army for the past few years
  20. ssn18
    ssn18 5 October 2015 19: 38 New
    0
    Someone revered Komoyedov and one gets the impression that there is nothing on our ships with acre artifacts. Or is it just my impression? It seems and re-read a couple of times.
  21. alex80
    alex80 5 October 2015 19: 44 New
    +2
    Quote: Old26

    And you can find out what the submarine fleet will give in the fight against ISIS?

    All missiles on the above - ANTI-PORTABLE, so it’s impossible to strike at ISIS with rockets either.

    If you really think that it makes sense to hit rockets with ISIS, then why did Caliber 636.3 not please you?
    This I reflect on the theoretical possibility of using the submarine fleet against ISIS. Although, I think that
    pleasure is too expensive, cheaper than airstrikes, and if you use Caliber, then for really important
    objects. But theoretically, our fleet has such an opportunity.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 5 October 2015 19: 56 New
      +2
      Quote: alex80
      But theoretically, our fleet has such an opportunity.

      The fleet, like the VKS, closes the sky of Syria for the most curious and blocks approaches to the shores. It is possible to supplement the support of the ground forces of Syria and, of course, the supply of everything necessary.
  22. anfil
    anfil 5 October 2015 19: 52 New
    +3
    Reconnaissance ship "Vasily Tatishchev" sent to the coast of Syria


    Its crew will monitor the situation on the air of both Syria itself and all adjacent countries, as well as over their territorial waters
    Read more: http://vpk-news.ru/news/27391
  23. Old26
    Old26 5 October 2015 21: 32 New
    +2
    Quote: skeket
    that the fleet will cover the sky of Syria from the sea,

    Only Moscow can cover it, and then only one and a half hundred kilometers, and even then one third of the territory of Syria. God forbid everyone else to protect themselves ...

    Quote: skeket
    and ships and boats with anti-ship missiles, just the same, to cool hotheads.

    Whose? Do you really think that a couple of watchdogs and a couple of missile boats will be able to do something in case of a serious upheaval? All this should cover the coast of one and a half hundred kilometers ... Is it possible for such a composition?

    Quote: alex80
    If you really think that it makes sense to hit rockets with ISIS, then why did Caliber 636.3 not please you?

    Do you even know how many calibers these boats have? If you don’t know, I can tell you - FOUR. And one of the boats just came to the fleet, after the interflot transition, in your opinion, no work needs to be done? Well, even if there is this boat there with these "calibers"
    Shooting subsonic missiles at non-stationary targets is nonsense. And for stationary ones, aviation works so well for them ...

    Quote: alex80
    But theoretically, our fleet has such an opportunity.

    Theoretical? Theoretical is. When in practice there will be a boat of project 636.3 - no one knows ...

    Quote: NEXUS
    The fleet, like the VKS, closes the sky of Syria for the most curious and blocks approaches to the shores

    I repeat the question again. Like six ships, of which only one has long-range striking and defensive weapons BLOCK one and a half hundred kilometers of coast. TFR project 1135 can not be considered at all. He has only two twin 76 mm gun mounts. And 4 launchers with anti-submarine missiles. The second patrol guard of the 61st project has no strike weapons at all, only old anti-aircraft missiles and one twin AK-726. More or less missile boat and KVP. At least there are missile defense systems with a range of up to 150 km .... That's the whole strike power of our group. Regarding the closure of the sky, I already wrote. “Moscow” cannot be immediately in all places, and penetration into Syrian airspace can occur from anywhere. And 4 SU-30s will not make the weather ... This is more of a nominal cover if someone tries to attack SU-24/25/34, but no more.
  24. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 5 October 2015 22: 48 New
    +1
    Quote: Castor
    It is good that Russia has a Black Sea Fleet. And a naval base in the Crimea. By linking everything into one chain, you are amazed - this is directly aerobatics of strategic planning. The sight of such a well-thought-out political game is simply breathtaking.

    Thinking right, dear comrade! Now, if we were to take the right course inside, it’s time to return the economy to the right track throughout the country, and not just the military-industrial complex. And in the SAR, after stripping the northeast and taking control of the Syrian-Turkish border, the gangs have only one way to the EU - to build a “new” Europe! good
  25. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 6 October 2015 00: 26 New
    +1
    Dear Colleagues! Articles must be carefully read, and only then hypotheses must be built.
    Ships of the Black Sea Fleet can be used to block the Syrian coast
    but only as part of the Mediterranean flotilla
    “At the moment Mediterranean flotilla enough for effective action in this area, ”said the admiral.
    And the Mediterranean OS includes ships and submarines of KSF, DKBF, and Pacific Fleet sends its units to it.
    So, the Black Sea Fleet is not alone on watch. It is supported by other fleets.
    This is from a military point of view. But this is not the main thing.
    THE MAIN THING IS THE POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESIDENCE OF OUR AND CHINESE NAVIES AT THE COAST OF SYRIA.
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 6 October 2015 09: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: BoA KAA
      And the Mediterranean OS includes ships and submarines of KSF, DKBF, and Pacific Fleet sends its units to it.

      Pacific Fleet?))) Can you name it? In general, the top of insanity is to drive ships from the Pacific Fleet to the coast of Syria, there is no reason for pride here.
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 6 October 2015 21: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        Can you name it? In general, the top of insanity to drive ships from the Pacific Fleet to the coast of Syria

        If necessary, then you can repeat May 2013:
        “A detachment of 5 ships of the Pacific Fleet went to the Mediterranean Sea ... a detachment consisting of the large anti-submarine ship Admiral Panteleev, the large landing ships Peresvet and Admiral Nevelsky, the tanker Pechenga and the rescue tug Fotiy Krylov left Yuzhno “The Chinese Sea,” the report said. The detachment is heading to the Suez Canal, the passage through which is planned for mid-May 2013.
        http://m.forbes.ru
        When there were not enough forces, the Navy formed a SR squadron of ships of all fleets, including and Pacific Fleet.
        So, as O. Bender said: “Do not be afraid, you are not in the church, they will not deceive you here” (c).
  26. Zomanus
    Zomanus 6 October 2015 06: 18 New
    0
    If there is a clash with enemy aircraft or fleet, then completely different forces will begin to work there. Plus electronic warfare is involved there should be robust, in theory.
    We all understand that the ships there are not for defense against a really serious enemy.
    They are there to indicate the presence and definition of the borders of the territory we control.
    Our fleet is touched - then the war will go by completely different means.
  27. Old26
    Old26 6 October 2015 08: 24 New
    0
    Quote: BoA KAA
    I disagree with one thing. Ships are not a symbol, but a demonstration of intentions.

    I spoke out unsuccessfully, Alexander. That's what I meant