Military Review

A spokesman for the White House said it doubts the success of the Russian operation against ISIS

75
Washington clearly burst out ... Comments about the Russian military operation against terrorists in Syria from official representatives of the State Department and the White House are pouring out of a horn of plenty. Obama administration spokesman Josh Ernest said that "the White House is doubted about the success of the Russian operation against LIH." According to Ernest, Russia and Syria will be difficult to achieve success, since "neither Russia nor Syria does not strike directly against ISIS." Such words were spoken by the White House spokesman at the next briefing.


A spokesman for the White House said it doubts the success of the Russian operation against ISIS


Ernest's statement leads RIA News:
I think it is extremely unlikely that Russia will be able to defeat the IG if it continues to support a regime that does not fight with the IG and inflates the conflict within Syria, plus if they (Russia) continue to adhere to the military strategy that is aimed at strikes not on the IG , and on elements of the Syrian opposition, including those who are at war with the IG.


As you can see, the White House continues to use rhetoric, according to which the terrorists can be divided into “good” and “bad”. Therefore, Ernest and the whole of Washington can keep their statements with them and keep them until the United States recognizes that terrorism in any of its manifestations is evil. If the United States wants to continue to continue the support of terrorist groups controlled by themselves, then let the spokesman state this officially, and not replace the notion of "terrorists" with the term "Syrian opposition."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Geosun
    Geosun 2 October 2015 12: 31
    27
    Because where ISIS is located only in the Pentagon. Who created, he knows.
    1. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 2 October 2015 12: 33
      13
      According to his position, he is supposed to read what is written. Read only. Then, in his memoirs, he will begin to show his "genius".
      1. Pavel Vereshchagin
        Pavel Vereshchagin 2 October 2015 12: 37
        20
        "According to his position, he is supposed to read what is written." And after all, Peter 1 said, "Boyars in the Duma do not speak according to what was written, anyway, everyone's foolishness was visible." Our guys have done more in three days than the entire so-called coalition in a year.
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur 2 October 2015 12: 44
          +2
          No one doubted that the f * cking house would doubt it!
          doubted, doubted, but did not doubt! (economic department tongue twister)

          ___________
          * in Russian it is read and pronounced through "I"
          1. Good me
            Good me 2 October 2015 12: 49
            26
            A spokesman for the White House said it doubts the success of the Russian operation against ISIS


            You ... Milo ... Don’t be fooled ...
            1. Zoldat_A
              Zoldat_A 2 October 2015 13: 09
              +5
              Quote: Good Me
              You ... Milo ... Don’t be fooled ...

              And they did not doubt the success of Vietnam, Korea, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan - But you never know what else ... The last success, which they could not doubt, is the success of the landing in Normandy. And then, mind you, only because they acted TOGETHER with Russia, and not on their own, and even more so, NOT AGAINST Russia.
      2. subbtin.725
        subbtin.725 2 October 2015 12: 38
        +8
        Washington clearly broke through ...


        The parrot said the parrot:
        "I'll parrot you, parrot."
        The parrot answers him:
        "Parrot, parrot, parrot!"
      3. Sasha 19871987
        Sasha 19871987 2 October 2015 13: 04
        +2
        do not care what they think, the option of Libya with Syria will not ride !!!
      4. Alexey Boukin
        Alexey Boukin 2 October 2015 13: 45
        0
        Well, if Washington and its slabbers do not interfere with their lies in the media, then we will somehow manage ourselves without their help. Now is the time for X and we must clearly understand that it is impossible to put up with this infection, which brings death in the Middle East. The fight against these obscurantists can be only one - complete destruction.
      5. Sterlya
        Sterlya 2 October 2015 17: 55
        0
        Quote: oleg-gr
        According to his position, he is supposed to read what is written. Read only. Then, in his memoirs, he will begin to show his "genius".

        when he becomes "former" then he will only say something sensible. mattress covers are almost
    2. Stalker.1977
      Stalker.1977 2 October 2015 12: 35
      15
      And the main base and leadership of the igil are in Washington, specifically the goal of the White House ...
      1. jjj
        jjj 2 October 2015 12: 47
        +4
        Psaki on maternity leave, and her business lives
        1. Erg
          Erg 2 October 2015 13: 49
          +1
          Anyway - well, somehow, without a light, he gives out. Miss jenny. crying
      2. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 2 October 2015 13: 15
        +2
        "specifically the goal of the White House ..."
        ... and until the BHC of the Russian Federation bombed the White House and the Pentagon, the State Department will argue that the Russian Federation is not fighting ISIS.
      3. 2С5
        2С5 2 October 2015 13: 25
        0
        ... and it was necessary to start with BiDE! One hell we are world-class aggressors (and most likely even space! fellow ) we have no conscience and pryntsypov (their media and politicians are constantly confirming this) well, so they would start to talk, look further and would not have to fight ...
    3. GSH-18
      GSH-18 2 October 2015 12: 48
      +2
      A spokesman for the White House said it doubts the success of the Russian operation against ISIS

      What, envy, sick?
    4. GSH-18
      GSH-18 2 October 2015 12: 55
      0
      Quote: Geosun
      Because where ISIS is located only in the Pentagon. Who created, he knows.

      Yeah .. Pontogon knows u wassat
    5. varov14
      varov14 2 October 2015 13: 29
      +1
      Well, the destruction of the buffer zone in the form of a pro-American opposition is also a good thing.
    6. AKESHA
      AKESHA 2 October 2015 13: 30
      +3
      It’s better for them to know. They were preparing to use their best weapons
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. Rezident007
      Rezident007 2 October 2015 13: 50
      +2
      YES THAT THERE IS THINKING, CLEARLY SAME ONE - EVERYTHING GOES TO THE THIRD WORLD !!! Here are just which countries against which the issue will be fought so far ... The Political Game so far in general.
    9. datur
      datur 3 October 2015 00: 47
      0
      [quote = Geosun] Because where ISIS is known only in the Pentagon. Who created, he knows --- Brilliant !! who is dad, he and mom !!! - since these are crying like that, it means our all are doing the right thing, Grandfather STALIN said so !!! wink
  2. Vend
    Vend 2 October 2015 12: 32
    16
    Doubt as much as you like)) Russia has already achieved success in such a short period. And the United States bombed ISIS, while the territory captured by ISIS strangely increased. Or did the United States decide to fight Russia in Syria supporting terrorists?
    1. Penetrator
      Penetrator 2 October 2015 12: 39
      +7
      I, personally, doubt that Josh Ernest is peeing exactly on the toilet. Even more, I’m sure that he constantly pisses past. Justification? Judging by his statements, a citizen is stupid like a cork and is not capable of precise urination. But I don’t make a problem out of it and I can’t put it up for public discussion.
      Let the Americans keep their doubts with them and sit on the fifth point evenly. The future will show who was right.
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 2 October 2015 13: 39
        0
        Quote: Penetrator
        I, personally, doubt that Josh Ernest is peeing exactly on the toilet. Even more, I’m sure that he constantly pisses past.

        They do everything in the US in their pants, so their policies smell bad
    2. 2С5
      2С5 2 October 2015 13: 27
      +1
      ... they simply cleared the territory with their ISIS bombing ... is it really incomprehensible? request
  3. sever.56
    sever.56 2 October 2015 12: 32
    10
    The main thing is that we do not have sticks inserted into the wheels, and everything will work out as planned.
    However, even if they interfere, little will change. The decision has been made and the matter is being done. It’s just that they come from manure because of Putin’s brilliant speech at the UN General Assembly and the instant actions of our air forces in Syria.
    Shock, panic, shame and humiliation - these are the feelings that Western leaders feel after their statements about the "torn to shred" Russian economy and that Russia is a gas station. And she proved to everyone that this is not so, and her position will have to be reckoned with. Let them get used to the fact that Russia begins to play by its own rules ... !!!
  4. asadov
    asadov 2 October 2015 12: 32
    +6
    Do not interfere with ours - this is the main condition for victory over ISIS.
  5. Samaritan
    Samaritan 2 October 2015 12: 33
    +2
    Well, who would doubt that ?! We are not a fighting unicorn like you!
    Only today in Afghanistan, Hercules was shot down ... how are things in the 15-year war ???
    Do not want to help, so do not bother !!!
  6. fedor13
    fedor13 2 October 2015 12: 33
    -1
    Who got up with what feet and bears. What was there yesterday, who said what, I don’t care. I express concern about the mental abilities of these say colleagues !!! am
  7. Alexnder
    Alexnder 2 October 2015 12: 33
    +1
    Well, there are already successes. If the Saudis are afraid of the flow of ISIS to their territory.
    But easily run to sit there.
  8. Orlenok ILLI4A
    Orlenok ILLI4A 2 October 2015 12: 33
    +2
    Who is your opinion interested in, and you don’t have your own opinion, star mongrel! Shah, the time of the BEAR has arrived!
  9. kil 31
    kil 31 2 October 2015 12: 34
    +3
    I think it is extremely unlikely that Russia will be able to defeat IS We will still try. What the hell is not joking, but suddenly it turns out.
  10. GUKTU
    GUKTU 2 October 2015 12: 34
    +7
    Mattresses, as always: a policy of double standards. From their point of view, the LPR and the DPR can also be considered moderate opposition.
    1. jPilot
      jPilot 3 October 2015 04: 31
      0
      No, the LPR and the DPR can in no way be attributed to the "moderate opposition"; they stand up for their homes, their families, their existence because their cause is just. ISIS and the "moderate opposition" are terrorist groups supported and nurtured by the United States and the rest of the GOP company. Therefore, they rage in impotent rage, and this rage and rot, unfortunately, will increase in direct proportion to our success. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen information coverage of our actions in Syria, as they say, so that the whole world knows and sees what is happening in reality. It would not hurt ours to show something like an interactive map of the location of terrorists, Syrian troops, contact lines and strikes.
  11. katalonec2014
    katalonec2014 2 October 2015 12: 34
    +2
    Yes, we are doing everything right, ISIS needs to be hollowed out there, and not at home, and if it gets moderate, it’s also good, at least we have bases there, and these will definitely be against it.
    1. 2С5
      2С5 2 October 2015 13: 30
      +1
      ... now let the ISIS states transport and territory them there using purely democratic methods, accurately and efficiently ...
  12. Afinogen
    Afinogen 2 October 2015 12: 35
    +2
    White House spokeswoman says he doubts


    And to us what is up to their doubts. What can I say, doubt further lol For that, they have everything in chocolate, how much they bombed on ISIS and the result is zero.
  13. kursk87
    kursk87 2 October 2015 12: 35
    +6
    Western sponsors resented that the Russian Air Force destroys their brainchild
    1. SteelRatTV
      SteelRatTV 2 October 2015 12: 40
      +1
      And us - the army !!! soldier Soon Iraq will also ask to remove the infection "at the root". fellow
  14. fregina1
    fregina1 2 October 2015 12: 35
    +6
    From the photo you can see that the partners were fucking! They didn’t expect that so quickly we would switch all our attention from Ukraine to the East!
  15. teron
    teron 2 October 2015 12: 36
    +3
    From my speech, I understood that: 1. Syrian troops are not fighting IS, and 2. Syrian "rebels" are fighting IS. Well, and the fact that "Russia will not succeed" is immediately obvious how the United States and its allies "succeeded".
  16. 79807420129
    79807420129 2 October 2015 12: 36
    10
    Yes pah on Fashington, you can’t see from the air which of the opposition, and which of the igil. Allah himself will sort.
  17. roskot
    roskot 2 October 2015 12: 36
    +5
    We are going the right way, since the mongrel screeched.
  18. 2224460
    2224460 2 October 2015 12: 37
    +1
    According to Ernest, it will be difficult for Russia and Syria to succeed, since "neither Russia nor Syria does not strike directly against ISIS."
    This "Yoprst" is burning again, and what was so loud then, the stench went all over the world, and joint statements and calls with warnings. Just the opposite, it seems, we are already achieving, since "the whole free world" with the hegemony at the head ...
  19. HAM
    HAM 2 October 2015 12: 37
    +1
    Of course, the toad strangles - so much money was poured into the "moderate" opposition, and they don't even ask for their names, they immediately send them to Allah for an appointment.
  20. Balu495
    Balu495 2 October 2015 12: 37
    +1
    Meli Emelya - your week. )
  21. Russian Uzbek
    Russian Uzbek 2 October 2015 12: 38
    +3
    "" I think it is extremely unlikely that Russia will be able to defeat IS if it continues to support a regime that is not at war with IS and is stirring up conflict inside Syria, plus if they (Russia) continue to pursue a military strategy that is aimed at on IS, but on elements of the Syrian opposition, including those who are at war with IS "" "
    I alone noticed that all this tirade is a meaningless billiard?
  22. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 2 October 2015 12: 38
    +3
    Washington clearly broke through ...

    It's only the beginning. Now the Pentagon will begin to miss its students, the CIA - "sources". Here they will break through in full.
  23. DMoroz
    DMoroz 2 October 2015 12: 38
    +3
    Or I could simply say (voice): "... of course they are scoundrels, but they are our scoundrels ..."
  24. mamont5
    mamont5 2 October 2015 12: 39
    +1
    "I think it is extremely unlikely that Russia will be able to defeat IS if it continues to support a regime that is not at war with IS and is stirring up conflict within Syria."

    It’s quite American - to shift our sins onto the shoulders of others. As they were provocateurs, they remained.
  25. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 2 October 2015 12: 40
    13
    Well .. go on sticking ... But Russia cannot be stopped already!
  26. demo
    demo 2 October 2015 12: 42
    +1
    Spokesman for the Obama administration Josh Ernest said that "the White House doubts the success of the Russian operation against ISIS."

    Japanese singer Kurasuka sang a folk song called "Oh, did I give something to that?", Which translated into Russian sounds like "Doubt!"
  27. Thompson
    Thompson 2 October 2015 12: 42
    +3
    In nature, they burst! Look how alarmed! We’re not bombing, not those bombing!
    You bombed, we were silent. Now it's your turn to be silent!
    Because regardless of your barking, the caravan has already gone!
    1. Good me
      Good me 2 October 2015 12: 52
      0
      Quote: Thompson
      In nature, they burst! Look how alarmed! We’re not bombing, not those bombing!
      You bombed, we were silent. Now it's your turn to be silent!

      They got used to this ... "Not at ease", they are now ...
      From that and screams.
  28. demandy1
    demandy1 2 October 2015 12: 43
    +3
    You can doubt your success in the morning, if no one has prepared breakfast. And Russian planes hit the target exactly if the Americans roared
  29. HMR333
    HMR333 2 October 2015 12: 43
    +3
    ha))) Russia in one day of an air strike made 100 times more successes in destroying militants than the vaunted coalition with the United States led! they understand that for them it is a shame in the person of citizens of all countries, including their own! they understand that they will destroy the terrorists and + this is a huge advertisement for Russian military equipment!
  30. Oznob
    Oznob 2 October 2015 12: 43
    +3
    Our army is working legally in Syria, America and comrades are not.
  31. Flinky
    Flinky 2 October 2015 12: 43
    +4
    Peskov already said that we don’t understand shit ... What else do you need to hear, boy?
  32. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 2 October 2015 12: 44
    14
    A spokesman for the White House said it doubts the success of the Russian operation against ISIS
    Many of you
  33. Masya masya
    Masya masya 2 October 2015 12: 46
    +2
    Pot calls the kettle black! Year of gophers spud!
  34. Andrea
    Andrea 2 October 2015 12: 52
    +1
    I think this is extremely unlikely
    So I think that it is extremely unlikely that you think. The task is to open your mouth.
    Apparently the states have stepped on their pet peeve. It’s impossible howl.
    They did not expect this from Russia and now they don’t know whether to support or condemn.
    Either Assad is not overthrown, then ISIS is not terrorists, but part of Al Qaeda, as if Al Qaeda are not terrorists, then do not touch the opposition, which receives weapons from the states and immediately surrenders the IS.
    MYSTERIES.
    It seems to have decided, persuaded the sixes, threaten a blockade.
    The blockade is war.
    No, definitely, the Yankees are going to war. They are not interested in stabilization.
  35. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 2 October 2015 12: 57
    +2
    I think it is extremely unlikely that Russia will be able to defeat IS

    Putin said that it is necessary "to provide all-round assistance to the legitimate government of Syria."
    He promised - he does.

    And if someone heard what he wanted to hear, that’s his problem.
  36. Watchdog
    Watchdog 2 October 2015 12: 58
    0
    Well, well, spring will show who is where ... laughing
  37. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 2 October 2015 12: 59
    +2
    And ISIS and "moderate" production of the FSA. Therefore, only no one knows where and when to bomb
  38. ML-334
    ML-334 2 October 2015 13: 01
    +2
    Well, how did they spend money teaching the opposition, and even the loss of one tragically affects the other three or four. The exact number is still being clarified, they could also escape to the igil.
  39. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 2 October 2015 13: 03
    +2
    and the representatives themselves to go and see the result of the impact is weak? Or is it better to see from the balcony of the pale house?
  40. Das Boot
    Das Boot 2 October 2015 13: 03
    +1
    The paradox is that by means of sanctions, isolation and mobilization of their vassals against us, the States achieve exactly the opposite effect. Of course, like many here, I am concerned about Russia's pulling into a new arms race and the economic collisions that accompany it, but, on the other hand, how else?
    1. Good me
      Good me 2 October 2015 13: 25
      +5
      Quote: Das Boot
      Of course, like many here, I am concerned about Russia's pulling into a new arms race and the economic collisions that accompany it, but, on the other hand, how else?


      But no other way. Now we are in the position of the USSR, before the Second World War. The period when we did not have time to re-equip and reform the Red Army.

      But there are differences. Then there was no deterrent to nuclear forces.

      Both their presence and the moral impact on our potential opponents give reason to believe that we will succeed, we will succeed ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  41. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 2 October 2015 13: 05
    +2
    Quote: HMR333
    ha))) Russia in one day of an air strike made 100 times more successes in destroying militants than the vaunted coalition with the United States led! they understand that for them it is a shame in the person of citizens of all countries, including their own! they understand that they will destroy the terrorists and + this is a huge advertisement for Russian military equipment!


    Side effect: do you want to fight with us? Take a look at Syria. There is a limited contingent. 3 of the day works.
    The worst thing for them is that this is not muscle-waving, but ordinary ordinary work, when the military was allowed to use force. Legally.
  42. L159Z
    L159Z 2 October 2015 13: 08
    +1
    But I doubt the veracity of this arrogant nonsense, moreover, he has already been more than once caught in a lie, as they say by the hand. And perjury is a mortal sin, unless of course he read the Bible. Let him be according to his deeds, Amen!
  43. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 2 October 2015 13: 08
    +5
    Find 10 differences. On the left is a radical Syrian terrorist, on the right is a moderate Syrian opposition. Please note - the picture is from the Western media and is dated back to 2014. Even then, some understood there.
  44. katalonec2014
    katalonec2014 2 October 2015 13: 11
    0
    They are worried, do not get confused, and it’s not on rocky horns that we bounce off.
  45. dual853
    dual853 2 October 2015 13: 16
    0
    ... LET THERE, BETTER, DOUBTS IN HIS SEXUAL ORIENTATION, LIKE NOT SHOWING YOUR "PSAKING" ONCE AGAIN ... !!!
  46. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 2 October 2015 13: 17
    +1
    I think that it is extremely unlikely that Russia will be able to defeat the IS, ..... if they (Russia) continue to adhere to the military strategy, which is aimed not at the IS, but at the elements of the Syrian opposition, including those fighting the IS .

    That's it! The states themselves admit in a statement that only "elements" remained of the Syrian opposition (it was recognized at the hearings in Congress that of all the fighting oppositionists trained by the West, only 4 - 5 people remained on the side of the opposition! The rest joined various groups of Islamic thugs)! Therefore, it is a great honor for our pilots to chase this trifle, which does not pose any danger! But the numerous gangs and groups of Islamic thugs, of which ISIS is only the largest and "promoted" and which are the main threat to the world, should be DESTROYED, which is what the Russian aviation is doing, and, judging by the way our Western "partners" have fidgeted SUCCESSFULLY!
  47. Signaller
    Signaller 2 October 2015 13: 38
    0
    Psacking series number 2. Toli still will be-Oh-Oh-Oh. After all, they will wait .........- definitely.
  48. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 2 October 2015 13: 55
    0
    I think it is extremely unlikely that Russia will be able to defeat the IS if it continues to maintain a regime that is not at war with the IS

    After that, I want to send Ernest himself on a business trip to Syria one way, let him see with his own eyes who is fighting with whom there
  49. TanakaKenshin
    TanakaKenshin 2 October 2015 14: 04
    0
    "Guys, do you communicate with each other at all? Well, I don't know, will you arrange a meeting?" (c) D. Kaigermazov

    In less than a day, two completely opposite statements came from Washington. The Pentagon says we are not bombing "moderate terrorists." The State Department says - we are bombing ...
    Are you not afraid of voter templates? :)
  50. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 2 October 2015 14: 08
    +4
    Quote: Good I

    Now we are in the position of the USSR, before the Second World War. The period when we did not have time to re-equip and reform the Red Army.

    But there are differences. Then there was no deterrent to nuclear forces.

    Both their presence and the moral impact on our potential opponents give reason to believe that we will succeed, we will succeed ...


    Well said. And rightly so.
    And the song from the last parade is on CDs, in bookmarks, on my phone and tablet. At parade 2, the things that impressed me the most: the passage of the Yars and the final song. hi