These messages were short and long, neutral towards the Russian Federation and hostile. Reading them, I could not get rid of the thought of what "wild" popularity in international affairs has recently acquired a "trick" called a shot in the leg. Confused by the unprecedented invasion of refugees, Europe, having climbed a powder keg, continues with frenzy to faithfully learn homework received from an American teacher.
Spanish ABC: Russia begins an air attack on Syria in the vicinity of Homs. Next: On Wednesday morning, the Russian parliament approved the bombing of an Arab country. El Mundo: Russia launches the first air strikes in the vicinity of Homs according to the United States. El Pais: Russian planes first attack the territory of Syria. And further: The Russian parliament gave the green light to the use of the army in Syrian territory in support of the regime.
Spanish media reported: the US has indications that Russia has already begun to conduct air strikes on Syria, a senior American official said on Wednesday 30.09, who clarified that Moscow had warned Washington in advance that it intended to carry out bombardments. According to this source, strikes were planned around the city of Homs in the west of the country. And it was there that the Syrian human rights monitoring organization reportedly killed 27 people, including six children, as a result of an attack carried out by Syrian pilots on Russian fighters. At the same time, American media outlets note that sources in the Obama administration point out that the shells did not get into areas controlled by jihadists.
Reading this information, it is impossible to get rid of surprise: “How? Is that all? ”I’m not talking about the gratitude of Europe ... As the Spaniards say, life goes on in the dreams of the impossible ... But the conclusion, the conclusion is what!
1. Russia is bombing an Arab country.
2. She does this in order to support the regime of President Assad.
3. The shells fall in the wrong place. And, presumably, they will never get there.
4. Not only civilians die, but also children. Those. it should be understood that the bloodthirsty Syrian pilots bombed their families.
As Europeans like to say, no comment.
I have only one question left: explain to me, a stupid person, why an international coalition to combat IG, consisting of 60 (!) Of the participating countries and led by the USA (!), Causing several dozen bombings to jihadists during the day, knowing exactly where they are, not only failed to achieve at least some significant results, but in the open loses to the "Islamic State" in all directions.
Although I understand - a rhetorical question ...