Power: for UN peacekeeping forces countries will provide 40 thousand troops

17
The summit participants, held at the United Nations on the initiative of the United States, managed to agree on the provision of additional 40 countries by thousands of military and police officers to participate in peacekeeping operations of the world organization, reports TASS the post of the US Ambassador Samantha Power.



At the opening of the meeting, Obama spoke of a smaller number of troops, calling the number 30 thousand.

“I am pleased to announce that our expectations have been exceeded. The countries promised to give a total of over 40 to thousands of military and police personnel at the disposal of UN peacekeeping, ”Power said at the closing of the one-day summit.

She also said that, in addition to the personnel, “over 50 countries promised to provide more 50 helicopters, 15 engineering companies and ten field hospitals”.

“All this is critically important for peacekeeping operations,” she said, and stressed that “now the UN member states need to fulfill the promises they made.”

According to TASS, the summit was attended by "more than 50 states, including Armenia, Georgia, India, China, Malaysia, Pakistan, Serbia, Ukraine and Japan."

The largest number of servicemen - 8 thousand - promised to allocate the head of the PRC Xi Jinping. The United States, according to Obama, will increase its contingent from 1-th to 2 thousands.
The Chinese leader said in his speech: “China, as a member of the UN Security Council, has been one of the main sources of funding and personnel for these operations for 25 years. China is ready to take the initiative and provide a police unit and 8 thousand soldiers for such operations. ”

"China will consider a request for the provision of specialists in engineering, transport and medical personnel to participate in peacekeeping operations," he added.

Xi Jinping also promised that “within two years, China will prepare two thousand peacekeepers from other countries and will organize 10 training programs for demining, as well as provide equipment for the demining units”.

“The greatest needs are in conducting peacekeeping operations in Africa,” he noted. “The international community should assist African states in ensuring peace and stability.”

According to the PRC Chairman, "China will provide $ 100 million over five years to the African Union to support its forces in crisis situations and will send the first helicopter unit to Africa."
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -14
    29 September 2015 15: 52
    Good news.
    1. +5
      29 September 2015 16: 05
      All the same, I agreed bastard (managed) .... Well Well ...
    2. +7
      29 September 2015 16: 18
      The us plan: to have oil and gas production in the Mediterranean for supplies to Europe, as well as oil and a gas pipeline through Syria from Qatar, which only American companies can do, respectively, to subjugate the richest region of the world - total control !!! Only Putin prevents him from doing this ... so the USA will never back down from such plans !!! It is impossible to destroy ISIS - everything will go under our control, so there will be "peacekeeping missions" to hide behind !!!
      1. Erg
        +1
        29 September 2015 23: 19
        While Assad is in power, there will be no pipes to Europe. Miller in chocolate. All this igil exists as long as it is allowed. And since it exists, says that their "fate" has not yet been determined above. Oh well...
  2. 0
    29 September 2015 15: 52
    And where will these bayonets be turned? Is it really going to be "set" on ISIS? Although it is unlikely that the Americans will not give offense to their offspring ...
    1. +2
      29 September 2015 16: 06
      Quote: marlin1203
      And where will these bayonets be turned? Is ISIS going to be "set" on?

      go to un-peacemaker yes read. What does ISIS have to do with it?
    2. 0
      29 September 2015 16: 09
      Probably to the former Ukraine.
  3. +2
    29 September 2015 15: 52
    The main thing is that we don’t get into Syria ... We ourselves will somehow sort things out with Iran ...
  4. 0
    29 September 2015 15: 54
    The article is not clear. Will we add troops or have we been asked to add money?
    1. +2
      29 September 2015 16: 11
      Quote: Kil 31
      The article is not clear. Will we add troops or have we been asked to add money?

      China Babos added to the UN ...
    2. +2
      29 September 2015 16: 12
      Quote: keel 31
      The article is not clear. Will we add troops or have we been asked to add money?

      this is decided by the UN Security Council - and financing, and composition, and application. Indirectly, this is simply a signal of the UN bureaucracy that they can be calm. And then they got excited ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    29 September 2015 15: 56
    Where so much ??? belay
    1. +1
      29 September 2015 16: 02
      Quote: Observer 33
      Where so much ??? belay

      To Syria .... When Russia cleans everything there ...!
      1. -2
        29 September 2015 16: 18
        Not only in Syria, but also in Ukraine it would not be bad to introduce peacekeepers!
        1. 0
          29 September 2015 16: 57
          Quote: Li_Mubai
          Not only in Syria, but also in Ukraine it would not be bad to introduce peacekeepers!

          Did you decide yourself or who prompted you? The Minsk agreement must be fulfilled, not a bicycle invented, are you just born? About the rotten parsley went, - he will lead you sucker, if you listen to him ...
        2. +1
          29 September 2015 17: 02
          Quote: Li_Mubai
          Not only to Syria

          so full, what is Syria? It’s ridiculous. The IS has already declared war on virtually the entire civilized world, what the fuck are peacekeepers? Muslims generally do what kind of heads to cut - in a blue helmet or without. These are 40 thousand. very quickly come to naught.
        3. 0
          29 September 2015 17: 21
          Quote: Li_Mubai
          Not only in Syria, but also in Ukraine it would not be bad to introduce peacekeepers!

          interesting. Peacekeepers, if under the guidance of shit-democrats, are not really creating the world.
          but it’s not so scary. Petya, a sick person doesn’t know everything
  6. 0
    29 September 2015 16: 06
    Old song: Kodlo cowardly, armed loafers. Accustomed to travel on the shoulders of Russian guys.
    The publication of our peacekeepers crashed into my memory, as all the helicopter pilots refused to fly by helicopter in Africa, they FIRING, and our contract and order are GO. Ours is not a pity.
    1. 0
      29 September 2015 17: 11
      Quote: Mercenary
      refused to fly in helicopters in Africa, there they shoot,

      And why do you think Peacekeeping troops are intended in terms of meaning - to resolve military conflicts, and not to travel on business trips, combining business with pleasure. To be where they shoot, and not where there is silence and grace, to do their job, and not to engage in any comparisons, where it is good and where it is bad. This is an army, after all, democracy has nothing to do with it ...
  7. APS
    0
    29 September 2015 16: 06
    I agree, why so many peacemakers? They got excited, it seems ...
  8. +1
    29 September 2015 16: 09
    Okay, keep parashenko .... bully
  9. +2
    29 September 2015 16: 11
    during Obama's speech "Granny" yawns.
  10. +1
    29 September 2015 16: 16
    China is investing 1 lard in the UN ... We are waiting for what and how ..!
    1. -2
      29 September 2015 16: 22
      Quote: MIKHAN
      China is investing 1 lard in the UN ... We are waiting for what and how ..!

      what are you waiting for?
  11. 0
    29 September 2015 16: 22
    I do not believe that something will be good from this, again an insidious move, a plan, because the USA just does not skimp.
  12. 0
    29 September 2015 16: 26
    Eh, Samantha. You're just a pale shadow compared to Jennifer Psaki! Well, what is it - "Over 50 countries have promised to provide more than 50 helicopters ..." Here is a brigade of US marines in the Rostov Mountains, or aircraft carriers off the coast of Belarus - here it is, brother. A helicopter to the country - isn't it a lot? Again the coalition is gathering, and these chelas (well, you understand who we are talking about) will try to rebound ... Are they sick, or what? The rope ends.
  13. 0
    29 September 2015 16: 33
    The Chinese give 8tysch! Fine! Previously, China did not show itself in peacekeeping missions. So the rumors about Syria are not so baseless. Well, what, Vova, the move of a horse, a dragon, i.e.?)))
  14. 0
    29 September 2015 16: 35
    For what are the cons, UN peacekeepers, by decision of the Security Council, carry out their missions.
  15. 0
    29 September 2015 16: 37
    Did the states pay off their debts to the UN? what
  16. +1
    29 September 2015 16: 59
    Putin.
    - What have you done, smoked?
    What did you turn the East into?
    Why say crazy
    Did you provoke ISIS?

    Obama
    -I wanted the Arabs, so their mother,
    I create democracy
    Bomb Iraq and Syria,
    Turn the East into an oasis.

    Putin.
    -And what, created his own dance?

    Obama timidly - Yes, we can.
  17. 0
    29 September 2015 17: 24
    but I’m interested, where does the non-state think to send their peacekeepers? They’ll stir up the Maidan everywhere!
  18. 0
    29 September 2015 19: 09
    If this Power is happy with the increase in the number of military peacekeeping forces, then the Americans have already planned new provocations, color revolutions and civil wars. What kind of clique has seized power in the USA? It will not end in good.
  19. +2
    29 September 2015 20: 35
    So they are there about the Chinese peacekeepers.
    So I made Chinese tea.
  20. 0
    30 September 2015 05: 00
    a good idea, but the Yankees and Britons should never be allowed to command ...