Media: Six Russian Su-34 bombers deployed to Syria

154
Informational portal The Aviationist Publishes material stating that Russia has sent six Su-34 bomber to Syria. The submission states that Russian aircraft were sent to an air base in Syrian Latakia, where, according to some data, are already located near 28 aircraft transferred from Russia (including Su-24, Su-25 and Su-30СМ).

At the same time, The Aviationist portal reports that the bombers followed the Avigroup together with the Tu-154 aircraft of the Russian Air Force, departing from Mozdok (Republic of North Ossetia-Alania). The site publishes a map of the route of movement: over the Caspian Sea, then through the airspace of Iran, Iraq and Syria itself.

Media: Six Russian Su-34 bombers deployed to Syria


The flight of the Russian Tu-154 by this route was reportedly determined using data from the site. flightradar24. At the same time, photos posted on Twitter on a user's page are published. Oryx:






Earlier, the same source reported on the supply of Russian drones "Orlan-10".
154 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +65
    29 September 2015 14: 26
    Finally, we will test them in a combat situation (they say they used Su-34 in South Ossetia, but the information is contradictory).
    1. +52
      29 September 2015 14: 33
      Well, it started ... guys! Carte blanche has been given to us ... But surveillance is useless.! This is for Western media ... bully
      1. +25
        29 September 2015 16: 08
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, it started ... guys! We are given carte blanche ...

        Well, suppose nobody gave carte blanche. Putin clearly said - under international law.

        And airplanes are just insanely expensive, but iron.
        The most difficult thing is to use this hardware as efficiently as possible: to synchronize with ground operations for up to seconds.

        Who owns the information - that owns the World.
        Hence the key message: the creation of a single information space with the Armed Forces of Iran, Iraq, Syria and the Militia.

        An experienced tennis player can play two balls against two opponents for a long time, provided that they send in turn. But he practically does not reflect synchronous feed.

        The question remains: who will be at the controls of these aircraft? If the Syrians, then they were prepared for more than one month or even a year.
        1. +8
          29 September 2015 20: 01
          Quote: iConst
          Well, suppose nobody gave carte blanche. Putin clearly said - under international law.

          Under international law, this is with permission, or at the request of the legitimate government of Syria Yes
        2. 0
          30 September 2015 16: 33
          and he also said, quote-- We, of course, are not going to head into this conflict .- How is it heard in two ways, where will they leave their heads?
      2. +13
        29 September 2015 18: 11
        It seemed to rush. On 34, the Syrians are unlikely to know how to work.

      3. +2
        2 October 2015 06: 49
        here we get high from Russia! England is with you!
    2. +7
      29 September 2015 14: 38
      In Georgia alone was enough ...
    3. +31
      29 September 2015 14: 54
      Mattress made clear snnimki. Only about Boeing and 200000 of our soldiers allegedly in Ukraine does not show
    4. +22
      29 September 2015 14: 55
      if Israel is not missed slightly, then nothing terrible will happen ... laughing
      1. +3
        29 September 2015 15: 53
        Quote: War and Peace
        if you don't miss a bit in Israel

        What if? Where then will Israeli artillery shoot? Or dare they raise the F-16?
        1. +2
          29 September 2015 17: 33
          Quote: Hedgehog
          Quote: War and Peace
          if you don't miss a bit in Israel

          What if? Where then will Israeli artillery shoot? Or dare they raise the F-16?


          Well, there we still have air defense, so check out the Jewish show-offs ...
      2. +11
        29 September 2015 18: 13
        Something tells me that Israel is in the subject. winked
      3. -31
        29 September 2015 21: 42
        Quote: War and Peace
        if Israel is not missed slightly, then nothing terrible will happen ..

        then Israel will uncover all the scraps from the Assad army and say that it was.
        The USSR has already tried and not in such a circle, only feathers and flew from the "doves of peace".
        1. +14
          29 September 2015 23: 14
          I’m afraid the Israeli hawks will suck here, since for them the area of ​​the base of the Russian Federation in Latakia within a radius of 300 km has become no longer a flight zone! soldier
          1. -16
            30 September 2015 00: 10
            Quote: Fighting Cat
            I’m afraid the Israeli hawks will suck here, since for them the area of ​​the base of the Russian Federation in Latakia within a radius of 300 km has become no longer a flight zone!

            when Assad built a nuclear reactor there, the flight zone was closed-blocked, it is completely unclear who flew in and razed everything to the ground, then the generals also traveled from Russia to find out why no one had noticed anyone.
            1. +6
              30 September 2015 02: 55
              the Serbs said that the training of the Arabs (called the Syrians and Iraqis) was simply none, they could not use most of the facilities of the complexes)))
        2. +4
          30 September 2015 03: 28
          Do you mean the Cruiser Eilat?
        3. +5
          30 September 2015 17: 47
          Quote: BlackDragon
          Israel will uncover all the scraps from the Assad army and say that it was.

          Yes, yes, the main thing is that Hezbollah does not interfere with Israel.
        4. 0
          2 October 2015 10: 29
          Quote: BlackDragon
          then Israel will

          , and raskarachivaet and rassyadyachat long ready for this Arab world.
    5. +15
      29 September 2015 16: 25
      Polite Russian pilots came to Syria)))) This is good, so the Ishilovites did not have long
      1. +3
        29 September 2015 17: 37
        Quote: North wind
        Polite Russian pilots came to Syria)))) This is good, so the Ishilovites did not have long


        our pilots are not "polite", but our pilots are falcons, brave, fearless, heroic and daring, and "polite" are our officials for a hundred thousand ...
    6. +2
      29 September 2015 17: 48
      Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
      they say they used Su-34 in South Ossetia, but the information is contradictory)

      and what is the contradiction? Of course, I didn’t stand with a candle, but I have never come across a refutation. Yes, and I see no reason to deceive on this occasion. Somewhere I read an article about electronic warfare equipment used during the three-day war of 2008. It stated that the Su-34s were used due to the fact that the Georgians had (thanks to the Ukrainians) BUKs at their disposal. Those. applied them successfully, but not immediately, but after losses 24-approx.
  2. +6
    29 September 2015 14: 26
    Probably they will. To fighters that 24ka, that 34ka one fig. Optics is good both there and there.
    1. +13
      29 September 2015 14: 29
      In fact, they will also hit the planes ... but what about the air defense of the ISIS is for today one "Almighty" and knows ... soldier
      1. +5
        30 September 2015 12: 51
        Now he will black in advance and appear at ISIS air defense. they’ll buy from Ukraine and send specialists from there. We need to be on top and watch. And not like at the beginning of the war with Georgia. You can’t lose planes, you can’t.
      2. +4
        30 September 2015 14: 38
        Stingers are plentiful. Therefore, work from an inaccessible zone.
    2. +16
      29 September 2015 14: 33
      A total of 34 aircraft at the Syrian base, not including helicopters, are a full mixed regiment. Not bad.
      1. +27
        29 September 2015 14: 49
        Quote: figvam
        A total of 34 aircraft at the Syrian base, not including helicopters, are a full mixed regiment. Not bad.


        Mixed strike air regiment:
        Su24 - 12
        Su25 - 12
        Su30SM - 4
        Su34 - 6
        1. +13
          29 September 2015 19: 01
          Quote: Sith Lord
          Mixed strike air regiment:
          Su24 - 12
          Su25 - 12
          Su30SM - 4
          Su34 - 6

          It is certainly good, and I think the number of aircraft will still increase. But my question is ripe: wouldn’t it be in the deserts of Syria that attack helicopters like the Night Hunter or the Shark or the MI-35 would be more effective? For me, it would be nice to send a couple of dozen attack helicopters there.
          1. +10
            29 September 2015 19: 42
            Quote: NEXUS
            But my question was ripe here: would it really be in the deserts of Syria that attack helicopters like the Night Hunter or the Shark, or MI-35 would not be more effective?


            Hi Andrey! I answer drinks Looking to solve what problems and in what areas.
            If in the desert, then definitely only the IBA and FBA (flies further and takes more), but in the suburbs and in small "settlements", then yes .. the helicopter is more effective, but again .. it depends on what targets will need to be destroyed.
            And the Syrians do not have Mi-35s, only 24s.
            1. +4
              29 September 2015 20: 05
              Quote: ancient
              Hi Andrey! I answer

              Hello Sasha drinks
              Quote: ancient
              but in the suburbs and in small "settlements", then yes .. the helicopter is more efficient

              The Ishilovites have no fortified areas that need to be pecked with 7 tonnes of blanks then. And I think the same Night Hunter would very well fit in with his capabilities in that war, as this rabble would climb out of the holes more often at night.
              Quote: ancient
              And the Syrians do not have Mi-35s, only 24s.

              No, as I say, why not put the same 35th?
            2. -6
              30 September 2015 08: 07
              An important thing that the Russian Air Force still does not have ("War is Boring", USA)
              Moscow is lagging behind in the field of precision munitions.

              Read more: http://inosmi.ru/world/20150930/230533539.html#ixzz3nBvcqTK4

          2. +8
            29 September 2015 22: 39
            Militants of MANPADS chew at least one place, and turntables from them are much more defenseless.
          3. -6
            30 September 2015 03: 31
            Looks like the answer to your question - the ban on the sale of "Mistral" "Mistral" Russia. Do not fly on your own ...
            1. +2
              1 October 2015 12: 04
              Just wondering what the cons. I commented on the following text "And I think the same Night Hunter would very well fit into his war with his capabilities"
              The absence of Mistral makes it difficult to deliver the same helicopters by sea (flying on any way under any way). Delivery of ground equipment (tanks, air defense systems, artillery) is also complicated. Swarthy and his company probably allowed the use of these ships in this direction. Or am I wrong?
      2. +12
        29 September 2015 17: 11
        Quote: figvam
        A total of 34 aircraft at the Syrian base, not including helicopters, are a full mixed regiment. Not bad.


        Of course .. "not sickly", especially those that stand in one line in an open space crying
        Or do you think that the camouflage net is ... "the best cover"? wassat

        1. +3
          29 September 2015 17: 53
          Quote: ancient
          Or do you think that the camouflage net is ... "the best cover"?

          Well, then the airfield is not military, where they still stand. But the security there is probably hoo, and there is air defense cover.
          1. +8
            29 September 2015 18: 15
            Quote: KnightRider
            Well, then the airfield is not military, where they still stand.


            This is understandable wink Latakia was chosen because this airport is located in the safest possible place in Syria, and the MTO is easier to organize, since there are also Syrian ports nearby. wink
            But what about the criterion of combat effectiveness? Okay 24-ki, 30SM and 34-ki can refuel, but what about the su-25? wink

            Quote: KnightRider
            But the security there is probably hoo, and there is air defense cover.


            How can air defense help from shelling from art installations or SRZO? request After all, a couple of cassette b \ n and enough ... all crying
            But all the main military air bases were built in southern and central Syria. This is for example:
            - Tiyas - the main base of the Syrian Su-24, MiG-25 and part of the Su-2.
            - Saikal - both squadrons of the Syrian MiG-2 are based there.
            - Shairat - a large base of the Su-22 and MiG-23, etc.
            These are all very large ABs, with very developed infrastructure, communications, shelters for l / s and RCBs for ground and aviation equipment.

            1. +1
              29 September 2015 20: 12
              Quote: ancient
              But what about the su-25?

              And what is wrong with their combat effectiveness?
              Quote: ancient
              How can air defense help from shelling from art installations or SRZO?

              All the same, air defense systems are needed there, God saves a safe person, as they say soldier Well, there is also an "antidote" from shelling by MLRS and other artillery. "Mercury-BM" is called. I don't know if they are in Latakia, but as you yourself wrote "Latakia was chosen because this airport is located in the safest possible place in Syria"

              Quote: ancient
              But all the main military air bases were built in southern and central Syria. This is for example:
              - Tiyas - the main base of the Syrian Su-24, MiG-25 and part of the Su-2.
              - Saikal - both squadrons of the Syrian MiG-2 are based there.
              - Shairat - a large base of the Su-22 and MiG-23, etc.

              Are they controlled by ISIS? Or dangerously close? request
            2. +5
              29 September 2015 20: 18
              Quote: ancient
              Okay 24-ki, 30SM and 34-ki can refuel, but what about the su-25? wink

              Sergey, hi and why should your "Rooks" refuel, they will fly to the nearest target and work it out, but what else is there, there are others.
            3. +3
              30 September 2015 11: 02
              Quote: ancient
              But what about the criterion of combat effectiveness? Okay 24-ki, 30SM and 34-ki can refuel, but what about the su-25?

              The Su-25 has a flight range of 750 km. - This is all of Syria part of Iraq. The nearest points of their application are Alepo 140 km, Hama - 100 km, Damascus - 300 km.
              Latakia is the homeland of Assad. There he has 100% support. Plus the sea is nearby.
        2. 0
          29 September 2015 18: 01
          There is where to hide, see google maps of Adan! wink
          1. +6
            29 September 2015 18: 53
            Quote: uladzimir.surko
            There is where to hide, see google maps of Adan!


            So we are "talking" about Syria, but what has Turkish Adana to do with it? belay Or "take cover", in the sense of ... "surrender"? wassat
  3. +26
    29 September 2015 14: 27
    Hold on to Bashar. Russia and you will not abandon Syria.
    1. +12
      29 September 2015 16: 30
      Some Israeli magazine published a map of the Middle East with a map of Syria on which ROSSIRIA (RUSSIA) is printed! There must be a former prankster Odessa!
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +5
    29 September 2015 14: 28
    Everything goes on as usual.
  7. +3
    29 September 2015 14: 30
    I would like to see them in the IG case !!
  8. +46
    29 September 2015 14: 31
    And everyone noticed, right? Yesterday, Putin at the UN ONA announced that Russia would not send troops into Syria. About the fact that our troops will not fly into Syria, there was no question laughing
    1. +17
      29 September 2015 14: 38
      I don’t know why the SU-34 could and should be limited to the older but modernized SU-24 (although the Russians may be flying at them), but if they decided so, let it be so.
      But armies like Syria, Iraq, Hezbollah and Iran need to be armed as soon as possible - killers and terrorists are already rushing to our territory and the US and the Israeli regime that support them are already "sharpening their teeth" in anticipation of the plunder and destruction of our country.
      1. -1
        29 September 2015 17: 21
        Quote: quilted jacket
        I don’t know why the SU-34 could and should be limited to the older but modernized SU-24 (although the Russians may be flying at them), but if they decided so, let it be so.


        And to think about the fact that 34 is corny and takes more, but at the same time it flies .. much further! wink
        Or do you think that since the "written" maximum 39 700 kg means "urya"? wink
        Oh yes, I forgot ... you did so "beautifully described the tactics of combat use with the Su-24" that ... where are there ... okay ... you know better wassat
        1. -4
          29 September 2015 18: 42
          Quote: ancient
          And to think about the fact that 34 is corny and takes more, but at the same time it flies .. much further!

          And where did you especially think about flying in Syria?
          Or were you taught the size of our country laughing
          Quote: ancient
          Or do you think that since the maximum 39 kg is "written", it means "urya"? Oh yes, I forgot ... you did so "beautifully described the tactics of combat use with the Su-700", that ... where are there ... okay ... you know better

          You seem to have "glitches" or memory lapses, I have not described anything or anything about the SU-24 anywhere.
          Although if you are reincarnation VAF you are forgivable, you are an extremely old and honored pilot, perhaps even with shell shocks lol
          1. +3
            29 September 2015 19: 17
            Quote: quilted jacket
            And where did you especially think about flying in Syria?
            Or were you taught the size of our country


            A ruler to take in hand and measure the "kilometer" .. weak? And don't forget to measure back and forth.
            About the calculation of the ISR ... modestly silent ... where can I really lol

            Quote: quilted jacket
            You seem to have "glitches" or memory lapses, I have not described anything or anything about the SU-24 anywhere.


            I have never suffered .. I hate to look for ... this is in the first articles about the appearance of our Su-24s in Latakia ... you are very "cool" there .. "told" for .. "the combat capabilities of the Su-24s" lol
            It's strange that your like-minded Kent didn't "connect" wink, or still understands what is the difference between a tank and a cow? wassat

            I don't want to say anything, but .. in Russia they have long been saying .. "tell me who your zhrug is and I will tell you who you are"? wassat
            But ... I will not say anything about this lol (much more then ... talk wassat )
            1. -4
              29 September 2015 19: 36
              Quote: ancient
              A ruler to take in hand and measure the "kilometer" .. weak? And don't forget to measure back and forth.

              And what do you think if it is ours they will fly and "bomb" throughout Syria, I doubt very much.
              And if at the helm the Syrians, they will probably be based at other air bases, not only in Latakia.
              Quote: ancient
              I have never suffered .. I hate to look for ... this is in the first articles about the appearance of our Su-24s in Latakia ... you are very "cool" there .. "told" for .. "the combat capabilities of the Su-24s"

              Well, let's write something else. Or maybe still tell me where I wrote this? Or do you stay - storytellers?
              Quote: ancient
              It is strange that your Kent-like-minded person did not "connect" wink, or still understands the difference between a tank and a cow?

              Looks like you sorted it out commendably lol
              Quote: ancient
              I don't want to say anything, but .. in Russia they have long been saying .. "tell me who your zhrug is and I will tell you who you are"? wassat
              But .. I on this occasion I will not say anything lol (where much more then ... say wassat)

              In-in this is definitely not worth talking too much to you, maybe you will pass for this .... well, how is it - "who knows a lot" lol
              You are our deserved pilot. How many types of aircraft have you mastered there - four, five?
              Laughter alone, an inventor smile
              1. +3
                29 September 2015 19: 48
                Quote: quilted jacket
                And what do you think if it is ours they will fly and "bomb" throughout Syria, I doubt very much.


                Yeah..know that "darkness" lol but to such an extent fool ... it is necessary .. "search" lol

                Quote: quilted jacket
                how many types of aircraft did you master there - four, five?


                Well, for especially ... "gifted" fool :
                1. Master not aircraft, but TYPES of aircraft! soldier
                2. Only in the "school" 3! soldier

                PS Gave the same advice ... "do not go there", where you do not understand or do not "reach"? lol
                1. -4
                  29 September 2015 19: 59
                  Quote: ancient
                  Yeah .. I knew that "darkness" lol, but to such an extent fool ... it is necessary .. "search"

                  Of course, of course you are our professional - computer lol
                  Quote: ancient
                  Well, for especially ... "gifted" fool:
                  1. Master not aircraft, but TYPES of aircraft!

                  Well, computer pilots should know better.
                  Quote: ancient
                  Gave the same advice ... "Do not go there", where you do not understand anything or how does not "reach"?

                  You give such advice, but you don’t follow it yourself - you climb wherever you need to compose at every step.
                  Okay, it's clear with you everything, as you were in the guise of vaf as a "storyteller" and remained only in a new guise lol
                  1. +3
                    30 September 2015 13: 14
                    Quote: quilted jacket
                    Of course, of course you are our professional - computer

                    Hey Vata, where did you serve?
                2. +3
                  29 September 2015 20: 42
                  Quote: ancient
                  ancient (

                  Alexander, do not pay attention. drinks
                  a padded jacket is just a quilted jacket, much worse when cotton wool in my head laughing
                  1. -3
                    30 September 2015 11: 59
                    Quote: Stroporez
                    a padded jacket is just a quilted jacket, much worse when cotton wool in my head

                    Another room "special forces" lol
                    1. +2
                      30 September 2015 12: 14
                      Quote: quilted jacket
                      Another room "special forces"

                      Well instructed the minuses? feel better? cartoon hero hehe.
                      come on, ishsho, I loved these hamsters in my childhood lol
                      1. -3
                        30 September 2015 14: 06
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        Well instructed the minuses? feel better? cartoon hero hehe.

                        May I ask whom?
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        current I in love in these childhood hamsters

                        What animals do you like? Yes, yes, yes, well, business, although now various sexual perversions in the "decaying" West are held in high esteem lol
                        They write that in Israel and in the Netherlands, this category of people is greatly respected, although for us Russians and for other normal people, to put it mildly, is wild.
                      2. +1
                        30 September 2015 15: 22
                        Quote: quilted jacket
                        They write that in Israel and in the Netherlands, this category of people is highly respected.

                        All Jews are recorded by the son of Abraham and Sarah. Vata, and lay out your photo, surprise the people wassat
                    2. The comment was deleted.
  9. -3
    29 September 2015 14: 32
    5th floor in the photo, obviously not Syrian)
    1. +9
      29 September 2015 14: 35
      Quote: NGAURO
      te floor in the photo, obviously not Syrian)

      No, the landscape is quite Mediterranean.
    2. +3
      29 September 2015 15: 32
      Quote: NGAURO
      5th floor in the photo, obviously not Syrian)

      Syrian see trees plus power line.
      But. this is not a fact yet. (although it’s possible)
      Before that, there was already a Chinese aircraft carrier in Syria. (Without planes, though) but who knows. and the green men appeared only later winked
  10. +3
    29 September 2015 14: 32
    - And everyone immediately believed some kind of left-wing site. Our guys didn't say anything about the transfer. Perhaps all this is just an overdeveloped sense of danger among Western "observers". And Twitter as a source of information ... are you guys serious? Forward to "Censor.net", or what?
    1. +4
      29 September 2015 16: 01
      Quote: Haettenschweiler
      Forward to "Censor.net", or what?

      For some, the "Censor" is a source of truthful information, but for others, a mare is a bride. Life is harsh. And love is no less evil. laughing
      1. 0
        29 September 2015 17: 48
        Quote: Hedgehog
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        Forward to "Censor.net", or what?

        For some, the "Censor" is a source of truthful information, but for others, a mare is a bride. Life is harsh. And love is no less evil. laughing

        not. no censor. it’s easier to go into the madhouse, there are people. You can understand anyone. But the Censor cannot be understood. (there are dill)
  11. +6
    29 September 2015 14: 33
    And on the Tu-154, the crews of combat vehicles, "advisers" and technical personnel were probably transported.
    1. 0
      29 September 2015 14: 37
      Quote: Colonel
      And on the Tu-154, the crews of combat vehicles, "advisers" and technical personnel were probably transported.

      Whole 170 goals. There was enough space for everyone.
      1. +6
        29 September 2015 15: 19
        Quote: keel 31
        Whole 170 goals. There was enough space for everyone.


        Are you, my friend, a fascist or a cattle breeder? So people are not called.
        1. +1
          29 September 2015 15: 26
          Quote: Colonel
          Quote: keel 31
          Whole 170 goals. There was enough space for everyone.


          Are you, my friend, a fascist or a cattle breeder? So people are not called.

          This is a code from the State Department. I feel like they overlaid the site. laughing
          1. 0
            29 September 2015 16: 57
            Quote: keel 31
            I feel like they overlaid the site.

            You’re laughing in vain. Last year, a real hacker attack was made on this site. Many of us were outraged to the depths of our souls by the tricks of American roofing felts, Israeli roofing felts, roofing felts of British cybercriminals.
        2. +9
          29 September 2015 15: 49
          French TV report - our planes and helicopters in Latakia
          1. 0
            1 October 2015 06: 09
            in the picture they write about Mi-24, and photo MI-8
    2. +10
      29 September 2015 14: 50
      Quote: Colonel
      And on Tu-154 probably transported crews of military vehicles

      Most likely, Tushka, as a leader, was walking, the front line had to fly to Il-76 earlier, and wait at the landing airfield. On September 26.09, some IL-76 was deployed over Iraq.http: //mil-avia.livejournal.com/121524.html
    3. +2
      29 September 2015 15: 27
      Quote: Colonel
      And on the Tu-154, the crews of combat vehicles, "advisers" and technical personnel were probably transported.



      The 154th can carry from 152 to 180 people ...
    4. +1
      29 September 2015 17: 31
      And the "Sushki" flew by themselves, controlled by the thoughts of the pilots by the neural system from the "Carcass" that has no analogs in the world. Joke.
  12. 0
    29 September 2015 14: 34
    6 out of 68 will be tested in battle. Good luck !!!
    1. mihasik
      -15
      29 September 2015 15: 09
      Quote: oberon 1
      6 out of 68 will be tested in battle. Good luck !!!

      What fight are you talking about? Most likely it will be shooting "babies" or shooting at "targets".
      1. mihasik
        -4
        29 September 2015 16: 06
        6 out of 68 will be tested in battle. Good luck !!!

        I didn’t understand something: ISIS has aviation and anti-electronic warfare facilities?
        1. 0
          29 September 2015 17: 33
          Fight-he and on the "ground" fight.
      2. 0
        30 September 2015 10: 55
        Quote: mihasik
        there will be shooting of "babies" or shooting at "targets".

        You probably have no idea how the Syrian opposition and others like them shot down Syrian planes with improvised means.
        1. mihasik
          0
          30 September 2015 11: 52
          Quote: Hedgehog
          You probably have no idea how the Syrian opposition and others like them shot down Syrian planes with improvised means.

          Do Syrian aircraft have EW systems on board?
          Here we are talking about the SU-34?
          From the reference: "Tests of the L-175V container of the Khibiny-10V complex began in January 1995. The second stage of testing began on the Su-34 in Ramenskoye in August 1997. On March 18, 2014, the L-175V complex was adopted as part of the aircraft armament. Su-34 in service with the Russian Air Force. "
          Are you saying that "empty" dryers flew to Syria? Then the point is to send them there at all? Or will only Syrians really fly on them?
          Something I did not hear that in Iraq and Syria, the IG dropped down at least one NATO aircraft, agreed among themselves?
          PS
          "Khibiny" is a serial complex designed for group protection of aircraft from air defense systems.
          Multifunctional air-based electronic warfare / suppression (EW / REP) complex. Developed within the framework of the Khibiny ROC by the Kaluga Scientific Research Radio Engineering Institute (KNIRTI, part of KRET), the chief designer of the complex is Alexander Semenovich Yampolsky. Investigations of electronic reconnaissance complexes (RER) combined with active jamming stations, which later led to the development of the Khibiny complex, were started by KNIRTI in 1977 (see below). In 1984, the development of the Khibiny-10V complex for arming the T-10V / Su-34 aircraft was already underway. In 1990, the first sample of the L175 complex, created within the framework of the Khibiny ROC, passed acceptance tests. By the mid-1990s, its container version L-175V was developed, designed to equip Su-34 aircraft.
          The REP complex provides protection of the aircraft from anti-aircraft and aviation weapons.
          1. mihasik
            -1
            30 September 2015 12: 16
            Or will our DRYs fly so smoothly that they can be shot down by DShK?)
      3. 0
        30 September 2015 18: 49
        Quote: mihasik
        What fight are you talking about? Most likely it will be shooting "babies" or shooting at "targets".

        This did not stop the Americans from using the F-22
  13. +24
    29 September 2015 14: 34
    For decisive success in Syria, infantry and artillery are needed: MLRS, howitzer and artillery systems, Buratino and Solntsepyok flamethrowers.
    As soon as the massive use of artillery for reconnaissance targets begins with adjustments from UAVs or in another way, ISIS warriors will immediately roll. Well, the consolidation of territories and stripping should be done by infantry.
    So - our iron, Syrian troops. The only way.
    1. jjj
      +8
      29 September 2015 14: 58
      Quote: ROMAN VYSOTSKY
      So - our iron, Syrian troops. The only way.

      There are also Syrian and Kurdish militias, Hezbollah, the Guard and special forces of Iran
    2. +1
      1 October 2015 06: 20
      Quote: ROMAN VYSOTSKY
      For decisive success in Syria, infantry and artillery are needed:

      Of course, and it will appear soon shopping mall. Air Force has not won anywhere else

      Quote: ROMAN VYSOTSKY
      As soon as the massive use of artillery against reconnaissance targets begins, with adjustments from UAVs or in another way

      With this, it is more difficult because the bandits will very quickly learn to disguise themselves, and most likely they will simply go under the protection of the civilian population (that is, they stupidly sit down in civilian quarters) as Hezbollah and Hamas do
      Quote: ROMAN VYSOTSKY
      ISIS fighters will immediately roll.

      Smiled, someone forgot a little about the civilian nature of the war with a religious component.
      Many people here regard ISIS and Al-Nusra as a regular army, and these are partisans
      Quote: ROMAN VYSOTSKY
      So - our iron, Syrian troops. The only way.

      Not so, very soon Russian troops will be there.
      You can be sure.
      1. +1
        1 October 2015 08: 20
        Quote: atalef
        The Air Force has never won a war anywhere

        In Serbia / Kosovo
        1. 0
          1 October 2015 08: 47
          Quote: Nagan
          Quote: atalef
          The Air Force has never won a war anywhere

          In Serbia / Kosovo

          They did not wage war there, but destroyed the country with impunity. If Serbia had air defense at least at the level of the USSR in the early 80s, the United States would not have succeeded. And so the air defense systems of the late 50s - early 60s, which did not even work as part of the automated control system - and they were extremely insufficient - of course, could not fight modern aviation.
          Therefore, Serbia is not an indicator. It's like a group of 20-year-old thugs beat up a first grader.
  14. -2
    29 September 2015 14: 35
    Serious guys have arrived. Each has a combat load, like a "super-fortress" of the Great Patriotic War. Is that the one with IS? Weakness in the knees does not appear?
    1. +6
      29 September 2015 14: 40
      The Americans also pumped up ISIS with weapons quite a bit. Most likely, they have everything in order with air defense.
      1. +5
        29 September 2015 15: 19
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        The Americans also pumped up ISIS with weapons quite a bit. Most likely, they have everything in order with air defense.

        Well, they will not be stingy for an additional hundred MANPADS for militants.
  15. +26
    29 September 2015 14: 37
    Tanks will soon be modern ..! Russia should not be threatened ..
    1. jjj
      +9
      29 September 2015 15: 02
      However, our armor is strong!
    2. +4
      29 September 2015 15: 23
      Well, why is there no DZ ??? At least "Contact-5". Can't you put it ??? I mean, start it on the BDK.
    3. +3
      29 September 2015 18: 14
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Tanks will soon be modern ..! Russia should not be threatened ..

      It is strange that there is still no professor))))
      Where are the comments that all this is garbage, and all there are already corpses ...
      And in general, only Merkava knows how))))
      1. 0
        29 September 2015 20: 41
        Quote: Ramzaj99
        Ramzaj99 Today, 18: 14 ↑
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Tanks will soon be modern ..! Russia should not be threatened ..
        It is strange that there is still no professor))))
        Where are the comments that all this is garbage, and all there are already corpses ...
        And in general, only Merkava knows how))))


        There’s no time for him to sharpen the laces with us here ... he colors the contour cards with colored pencils)))
    4. The comment was deleted.
  16. +3
    29 September 2015 14: 39
    The worst thing for the Americans is that they cannot say with certainty how they got to Syria! They were so sure of being in control of everything, everywhere! laughing
    1. +1
      29 September 2015 15: 04
      - how they appeared in Syria! They were so sure of being in control of everything, everywhere!

      And how did our "polite people" appear in Crimea ?! laughing
      Although "they"
      so confident in control of everything and everywhere!
      !
      So it is here!
      How did you get ...?! Well, something like that! Let the ame.ry puzzle themselves:
      - Barack! These insidious Russians are back to us .... whether! Fell down like snow on your head!
      - Yes, I agree, John! They are so insidious, these Russians!
      - Barack! Ours could not do anything, because they did not know against whom and what to do!
      - I know, John and it's all sad!
      And you're right John, we are all n ... By the way, and the beer is left, pour it into a mug!
      - Yes, and do not forget the chewing gum, otherwise I have to crawl to the briefing!
      1. +1
        29 September 2015 15: 32
        I will add - everything is normal, everything is going as it should! soldier
    2. 0
      29 September 2015 21: 47
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      The worst thing for the Americans is that they cannot say with certainty how they got to Syria! They were so sure of being in control of everything, everywhere!

      Enough wishful thinking, there is an American radar in Israel that monitors a very large area of ​​BV, not to mention Turkey and Qatar.
    3. +1
      1 October 2015 06: 21
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      The worst thing for the Americans is that they cannot say with certainty how they got to Syria! They were so sure of being in control of everything, everywhere! laughing

      Of course they know about the transfer of planes and the repair of the runway, which were in our news a month ago. wink
  17. +11
    29 September 2015 14: 39
    we have about 50 sous 24 near Orenburg, they otdaliby there. And then they quietly and peacefully disposed of for the state budget for another pancake.
    1. +1
      29 September 2015 15: 24
      Do not worry, everything is in its turn. And these are fighting there.
  18. +1
    29 September 2015 14: 39
    In the last photo, in my opinion, not ducklings, but su-30cm ... Or not?
    The news is good somewhere, but is it? Source, I'm sorry ... twitter.
    1. +7
      29 September 2015 14: 43
      Su-34 there in the photo. The muzzle is flat and there is no such container behind the nozzles of the Su-30 cm.
      1. +3
        29 September 2015 14: 51
        There it is already clearly written that su -34. The glider shows ... a duck nose.
    2. +10
      29 September 2015 14: 53
      ____________________________________________________________________________
  19. +6
    29 September 2015 14: 42
    "... in the Middle East, bombers decide everything. And maybe even well-organized reconnaissance ..."
    From: I. Belyaev "From the back door", Military Publishing House, Moscow, 1972, p. 148. winked
  20. -2
    29 September 2015 14: 46
    The USA is not hysterical yet ??))
  21. +16
    29 September 2015 14: 47
    Well, in Syria, there is a fairly strong grouping of our armed forces:
    4 Su-30CM, 12 Su-24 and 12 Su-25, as well as 12 Mi-24 / 35 and 2 Mi-17. Now they will be joined by 6 Su-34. And if the Su-24 may be transferred to the structure of the Syrian Air Force, another USSR handed over to Syria the 24 Su-24, Since the Syrians have trained crews, the Su-25, Su-30 and Su-34 will be part of our aviation group.

    Plus to this:
    The staff of the Russian logistics center in Syrian Tartus has been increased to more than 1700 specialists in recent years.
    At the beginning of the Syrian crisis, the PMTO staff consisted of only a few people, the newspaper writes.

    "The PMTO will be able to simultaneously receive ships of the first (destroyer) and second (large landing ship) rank from the Russian Mediterranean grouping," a source in the General Staff told the newspaper, denying any connection between the modernization of the facility and "impending military intervention."

    http://flot.com/2015/%D0%A1%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F21/


    The satellite images clearly show the position of the C-300 / 400 SAMs, T-90 and BTR-80 / 82 tanks ... And all this apart from the fact that almost all 1-2 Black Sea Fleet ships went to Sredinimek.
    1. +4
      29 September 2015 15: 04
      Quote: Novel 1977
      The satellite images clearly show the position of the C-300 / 400 SAMs, T-90 and BTR-80 / 82 tanks ... And all this apart from the fact that almost all 1-2 Black Sea Fleet ships went to Sredinimek.

      "Something" is happening in the vastness of Syria at this time. The flow of information shrank to zero, everything was filled up with the UN.
      I hope that the security of the bases will be at a normal level and will not allow the SAS and other berets to enter the perimeter.
    2. -1
      29 September 2015 20: 23
      Quote: Novel 1977
      And if the Su-24 may be transferred to the Syrian Air Force

      That is, there is no way back home for them? I don’t think so. But they can be transferred to Syrian crews, and according to media reports, they have already been transferred to carry out a combat mission in the Aleppo area. soldier
  22. +8
    29 September 2015 14: 51
    Pasatrel on the map and the question immediately arose: do we really have such bad relations with Baku that they did not allow us to fly over their country? what
    1. +2
      29 September 2015 14: 56
      Who said that we have bad relations with Baku? A very good relationship.
      1. +9
        29 September 2015 16: 09
        Quote: KGB WATCH YOU
        Who said that we have bad relations with Baku? A very good relationship.

        Looks like Baku has better relations with Turkey .....
    2. +2
      29 September 2015 14: 57
      What's the point? Cut a little, and cross the border 2 extra times
      1. +2
        29 September 2015 15: 08
        Quote: HollyGremlin
        What's the point? Cut a little, and cross the border 2 extra times

        Nifig himself a little bit, a big hook over the Caspian Sea muddied.
        1. 0
          29 September 2015 16: 45
          Quote: Krasmash
          Nifig himself a little bit, a big hook over the Caspian Sea muddied.

          Through Turkey, twice as short ... laughing
          1. +4
            29 September 2015 16: 48
            Quote: Semen Semenych
            Quote: Krasmash
            Nifig himself a little bit, a big hook over the Caspian Sea muddied.

            Through Turkey, twice as short ... laughing

            Here the Kurds will punish them, then it will really become shorter.
  23. +4
    29 September 2015 15: 03
    Obama's anti-Russian policy resulted in the strengthening of Russia's position in Syria. And all this was accompanied by the applause of the international community. As a politician, Obama is a complete zero, and only the huge influence of the United States makes this dwarf figure in any way noticeable.
    1. -2
      30 September 2015 12: 53
      Quote: sl22277
      As a politician, Obama is a complete zero, and only the huge influence of the United States makes this dwarf figure in any way noticeable.
      Is it Yevgeny Yanovich Satanovsky's name, by any chance? It hurts for the morning broadcast at Solovyov NV Vesti FM looks like
  24. +5
    29 September 2015 15: 08
    May God keep Syria. Then the s will be quiet and the tail will be pressed
  25. +1
    29 September 2015 15: 12
    Quote: Novel 1977
    And if the Su-24 may be transferred to the Syrian Air Force, the USSR also transferred 24 Su-24 to Syria, i.e. Since the Syrians have trained crews, the Su-25, Su-30 and Su-34 will be part of our aviation group.

    I see no reason to transfer these Su-24s to them.
    If you pass it on, I would have driven their pilots to us to test their knowledge, well, teach them if necessary, and then overtake them themselves.
    1. 0
      29 September 2015 15: 30
      Unfortunately, there is no time to train Syrian pilots. Those that are working at the limit of human strength, especially helicopter pilots. According to the captured Syrian pilot in June 2015, the loss of the helicopter fleet amounted to 90 percent, for strikes used Navy helicopters, not adapted for this There are still enough planes, but there are not enough pilots.
      As the prisoner said, the Syrian Air Force does not have enough helicopters, but there are still enough aircraft - these are MiG-21, MiG-23 and MiG-29 fighters.

      According to pilot Ali Abdul, there are 500 combat pilots in the Syrian Air Force, 80% of them are Alawites (the denomination to which Bashar al-Assad belongs), the remaining 20% ​​are recruited from the Sunni majority. The pilot said morale remained “very high as they defend their land,” although most military personnel, he said, are hoping for an early end to the war.
  26. +1
    29 September 2015 15: 16
    Judging by the photos, our people feel confident there. The conclusion suggests itself that everything is reliable with air defense there!
    1. 0
      29 September 2015 16: 50
      Quote: Retvizan 8
      The conclusion suggests itself that everything is reliable with air defense there!

      It would be silly ...
  27. +1
    29 September 2015 15: 24
    They will prove themselves well ... there will be new orders for aircraft factories.
    The experience of applying the same is important, teachings are teachings, and war is the test of life.
    1. +1
      30 September 2015 12: 56
      Quote: Strashila
      They will prove themselves well ... there will be new orders for aircraft factories.
      The experience of applying the same is important, teachings are teachings, and war is the test of life.

      Now, this confuses me a lot. Why did the Americans let our Air Force go there: maybe they started some kind of provocation?
  28. 0
    29 September 2015 15: 28
    Good help for Assad!
    1. -1
      29 September 2015 15: 52
      Quote: Simon
      Good help for Assad!

      Not only. We also help the Zionists. This sly-backed Benya prime minister came to Moscow to persuade Putin to attack the Islamists with the involvement of the Russian armed forces. He directly dragged us into the war as brutes. Now he is thrilled, of course, his soldier knows how many saved just one trip north.
      1. +5
        29 September 2015 16: 00
        Not a single case of shooting of all these Syrian Islamists at Israel has been recorded. On the contrary, Israel will strike at the positions of the government troops if by chance something flies through the cardon into the Golan Heights occupied by Israel. Moreover, not even a single statement of the leaders of the Syrian Islamists against Israel.
        And Benya flew in with a request not to transfer some air defense samples to the Syrians, and if they are in Syria, they will be exploited and controlled by the Russians themselves. I think this is all that they could promise him, IMHO
        1. 0
          29 September 2015 16: 29
          Quote: Pissarro
          Not a single case of shooting of all these Syrian Islamists at Israel has been recorded. On the contrary, Israel will strike at the positions of the government troops if by chance something flies through the cardon into the Golan Heights occupied by Israel. Moreover, not even a single statement of the leaders of the Syrian Islamists against Israel.

          The Jews calculated their risks in advance + saw that Russia was pulling off the equipment of Assad, so they decided to beat the ISIS with someone else's hands, so to speak. They worked ahead of the curve, but they hit the government troops out of habit.
        2. -1
          29 September 2015 17: 07
          I fully confirm)))) Benya flew in that Russia would control all the equipment itself, which could strike Israel. Especially air defense.
          1. 0
            30 September 2015 13: 10
            Quote: AwaZ
            I fully confirm)))) Benya flew in that Russia would control all the equipment itself, which could strike Israel. Especially air defense .

            Explain to me already how air defense can strike at Israel?
            Have the Jews learned to lift cities into the air and fly them over Syria?
  29. 0
    29 September 2015 15: 36
    That's right - Assad needs help, because if the Assad regime falls, the Americans will take on Iran, and after Iran they will try to create a Maidan situation in our country. A bit off topic - today, for the sake of interest, there is no censor, and it turns out that Russia created ISIS and Assad is bombing peaceful demonstrators, armed to the teeth.
  30. +1
    29 September 2015 15: 42
    For the first time since their arrival in Syria, the Russian Air Force launched a series of airstrikes northeast of Aleppo province, against the positions of the Islamic state and Ahrar al-Sham militants who joined ISIS to overthrow the Bashar al-Assad regime. The fortifications of Islamic terrorists along the Deir Hafer-Aleppo highway were bombed and attacked from the air, while the Syrian army attacked a militant group on the ground. During the operation, from 120 to 140 bandits were destroyed. In Aleppo itself, street battles are still ongoing, media reported.
    This is not about the SU-34, about those who arrived earlier.
    1. +2
      29 September 2015 16: 12
      You should at least give a link to the source ... as well as the OBS to the Arab media.
  31. 0
    29 September 2015 15: 49
    Earlier, the same source reported on deliveries of Russian Orlan-10 drones to Syria. An interesting source, how did you see these?
  32. 0
    29 September 2015 15: 54
    The Aviationist information portal publishes a material informing about the sending of six Su-34 bombers by Russia to Syria

    Good news. But personally, I think that they don't really need more than the Su-24. And on the "Syrian Express" give them a lift to several "Buratino" and more old "Grad" - and they will be happy
    1. +1
      29 September 2015 17: 27
      Quote: nazar_0753
      But personally, I think that they don't really need more than the Su-24.


      Do not think correctly No. Since they have never "tried" at a temperature of at least +10 grams to take off with 4 500-kami (M-62), of course, and with 2 PTB ... "oil painting" laughing
      1. +2
        29 September 2015 19: 19
        Quote: ancient
        . "oil painting"


        Well, where do not throw .. some "great ice" and it is with the Su-24's? wassat or MINUS is it vapes .. "truncated"? wassat
  33. +1
    29 September 2015 15: 59
    Okay, they'd have vacuum-charged bombs.
    1. -1
      29 September 2015 17: 29
      Quote: GYGOLA
      .. They would also have bombs with vacuum charges.


      Tried it back in the 80s ... on flat terrain, the effect is not just 0, but "minus 0" soldier
      1. +4
        29 September 2015 19: 11
        On the plain, the effect is good, in the mountains it is bad (the air is rarefied), they were mixed 1ODAB + 2 Smoke.
        1. -1
          29 September 2015 19: 51
          Quote: Zaurbek
          The effect is good on the plain


          Well, yes, well, yes ..... "tried". We calculated the "ellipse" of the zones (all), set up the equipment, and instead of "manpower" we tied the rams.
          We went in and threw off a couple ... so spectacularly .. there was a lot of smoke ... but when it dissipated ... almost all the rams ... are ALIVE, well, the technique .. slightly .. "smoked" wink
          1. 0
            29 September 2015 20: 52
            Quote: ancient
            We went in and threw off a couple ... so effectively .. there was a lot of smoke ... but when it dissipated ... almost all the rams ... LIVE, well, the technique .. slightly .. "smoked" wink

            Of the rams (in my opinion) Only one survived ... laughing
  34. +5
    29 September 2015 15: 59
    Western media have already raised a howl that the Syrian army is ironing out "peaceful opposition" with our bombs, which means it's good for them creatures flew!
  35. +1
    29 September 2015 16: 12
    And what's on the belly on the last photo? (I think so extra tanks)
    1. +4
      29 September 2015 16: 48
      Quote: Max40
      And what's on the belly on the last photo?

      PTB (outboard fuel tank).
  36. +3
    29 September 2015 16: 54
    I read the bourgeois website, commentators have no doubts that the SU-34 will be the most useful in Syria. Moreover, they (commentators), as I understood from day to day, expect the arrival of the A-50. So that's it !!!
  37. 0
    29 September 2015 16: 57
    34 were sent to comb the air defense system what the igils have ... to clean up the field, so to speak
    1. +2
      29 September 2015 17: 58
      ISIS has no air defense or aviation (yet). MANPADS are probably there, but their radius is not the same to raise 34s specifically for this.
      In my opinion, the SU-34 and SU-30SM (!) Are there so that NATO aircraft "by mistake" do not do anything.
      1. +3
        29 September 2015 19: 09
        theoretically, the bearded may have trophy Syrian wasps and arrows 10 the question is in their combat readiness and the availability of calculations, although it must be remembered that the states have already supplied the thugs with ATGMs and in Afghanistan they supplied the militants with stingers so you can wait for anything
  38. 0
    29 September 2015 17: 05
    Correct actions. If, of course, this is true.
    1. +6
      29 September 2015 18: 50
      Another stuffing:
      NATO Force Commander: Russia Deploys Latest Air Defense Systems in Syria
      General Philip Breedlove, NATO commander in Europe, warns that, according to him, Russia is deploying advanced long-range anti-aircraft missile systems on the territory of its new military base in Syria, and these actions may interfere with the plans of the United States and allies in the Middle East. ...
      http://newsru.co.il/mideast/29sep2015/bubble456.html

      That is, our Russian air defense in Syria could prevent the US Air Force or the Israeli regime’s Air Force from helping its proteges with terrorists and bombing Assad’s army.
      1. +1
        29 September 2015 20: 22
        Quote: quilted jacket
        That is, our Russian air defense in Syria could prevent the US Air Force or the Israeli regime’s Air Force from helping its proteges with terrorists and bombing Assad’s army.
        - Well, why be spiteful. His concern is justified: if this is the case, then every "air sneeze" they will have to at least coordinate with Moscow.
        And then they will fall under the distribution - and no one except themselves is to blame ...
        1. -1
          29 September 2015 20: 31
          Quote: iConst
          His concern is justified: if this is the case, then every "air sneeze" they will have to at least coordinate with Moscow.

          So let them agree or do they want to fly in the sky of Syria where they want and how they want? This is still an independent country and it did not call for help from the United States or the Israeli regime, but Russia from us. So let them ask smile
          1. +1
            29 September 2015 20: 38
            Quote: quilted jacket
            So let them ask
            -Yes, damn it, what a blow to the pride of these ... self-righteous I don't-know-how-to call it! smile

            A little more and the vassals will openly worry - the tiger is not the same! laughing
  39. 0
    29 September 2015 19: 15
    34ki can be justified by testing new weapons, night bombardments, high-precision new ammunition will be rolled in on militants. And the main purpose of the 24/34 air defense breakthrough with enveloping the terrain and the destruction of important objects. What are the important targets for ISIS? You can also send Tu95 in the version of the bomber. The most for carpet bombing and the use of large-caliber 1000-1500 bombs.
  40. 0
    29 September 2015 19: 47
    The cumulative grenade was that.
  41. +2
    29 September 2015 20: 47
    Quote: mihasik
    I didn’t understand something: ISIS has aviation and anti-electronic warfare facilities?

    ISIS has "friends" who can "accidentally" make mistakes and bomb AB in Latakia! Therefore, the air defense "keeps its ears on top of the head", protects "partners" from mistakes! Israel, for example, is already at war with might and main in the Golan Heights, together with militant friends from Al-Nusra (of course, in collusion with the SGA, they are trying to "persuade" the Russian Federation to join their "coalition"). So adding 34's is necessary and timely! Our cause is just and victory will be ours! drinks
    1. +4
      29 September 2015 20: 52
      Quote: Vlad5307
      ISIS has "friends" who can "accidentally" make mistakes and bomb AB in Latakia!

      As well as our SU-30 can "make a mistake" and thrust these figures with topographic criticism into the ground when they decide to do such a dirty trick. hi
      1. -3
        29 September 2015 21: 53
        Quote: NEXUS
        As well as our SU-30 can "make a mistake" and thrust these figures with topographic criticism into the ground when they decide to do such a dirty trick.

        6 DRYERS do you think scared all the US Air Force (google about the base in Qatar) and allies? laughing
        1. +1
          29 September 2015 22: 16
          Quote: BlackDragon
          6 DRYERS do you think scared all the US Air Force (google about the base in Qatar) and allies?

          And you google, maybe you will find with whom Syria is at war. And yet, all the planes in Qatar will "get lost" and end up over Latakia? laughing
  42. -4
    29 September 2015 21: 25
    In the port of Tartus, the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning docked.
    http://agitpro.su/v-portu-tartus-prishvartovalsya-kitajskij-avianosec-lyaonin/
  43. -2
    29 September 2015 22: 45
    Quote: supertiger21
    Eh, what news good ! I wish the Su-34 pilots successful conduct of combat sorties, it is necessary to show the power of Russian weapons in all its glory soldier !


    I hope that our aces will be at the controls of the Su-30 and Su-34. The Syrians, I think, are not yet ready for such birds, they will have enough work on the rooks.
    Well, our air defense, including specialists, must be powerful in Syria to cover ours and the Syrians, both in the air and on the ground. good
  44. -1
    29 September 2015 23: 00
    why are you happy ... not in Ukraine, so they are trying to drag us into the war in Syria, how much can you help everyone? then everyone who helped spit on our trail ... of course we need to help Syria with equipment, instructors, but not by any means our guys ... how many sofa generals ... it's time to try forward into the attack ... now get up and go on the attack, and our officers, soldiers can die ... not you gentlemen, typewriters ... let the country get on its feet and think about itself and not about someone else like our mother Russia has been doing all history for centuries
    1. +4
      29 September 2015 23: 13
      Quote: darksoul
      . Let the country get on its feet and think about itself and not about someone else

      Everything seems to be correct. But firstly, most of those present here have either served or are serving. Secondly, about letting the country rise ... ALIAS XIUM camps for training militants have ALREADY been built near the borders of Tajikistan and this is only the beginning. And if we continue to languish brush off, everything that is happening in Syria will spread to our territory. Question-IT DO WE NEED?
      As one of the military said, it is better to fight on the banks of the Euphrates than the Volga.
      But in one thing you are right, our guys should not be sent there, because there is an Assad army, which already quite successfully fights ISIS for 4,5 of the year.
  45. -1
    30 September 2015 02: 21
    the second photo with mugs is just COOL!
    and a complete kapets!
    I have not seen such 100 pood arguments for 10 years ...
    It remains only to hear journalists from the country "most, most democratic" - like Sjera Leone ... People live ...
  46. -6
    30 September 2015 07: 08
    Well, as they say, congratulations, now Russia has flown into the Middle East with its full scope, but not just anywhere, but in a civil war where 20% of the Alawites are fighting against 80 percent of the population.
    1. +3
      30 September 2015 13: 00
      And who told you that. YOU do not make laugh normal people. And think for yourself, even with your head. Before writing this.
  47. +5
    30 September 2015 09: 09
    For the fact that our men in Syria, the number of take-offs always coincide with the number of landings!
  48. +2
    30 September 2015 09: 38
    What is important is the fact of the presence of our aircraft there and their flights in the sky of Syria.
    Just politically.
    Plus, the protection of airfields.
    Just because it is clear who is behind ISIS ..
    But so start to shoot down Russian planes - few people decide on this.
    Simply - the situation around this country is changing dramatically.
    Accidentally knock down a Syrian aircraft - this one ..
    But to turn the provocations around the Russian aviation group is somewhat different.
  49. +9
    30 September 2015 09: 58
    In general, I can give the following arguments to all doubters:
    1 Air Force is created for the conduct of war, and not for posh air attacks.
    2 That logic - that if we do not touch anyone, then nobody touches us - it unfortunately does not work.
    After Yugoslavia was the Donbass.
    3 Officially Russian aviation is there to counter terrorists. Which is quite "kosher".
    4 If Russian aviation is ALWAYS based on Russian territory and never moves anywhere -
    it is simply not taken into account in possible political combinations.
    5 Really better to lead the standoff in Syria than in Central Asia ..
    6 Squeals - possible losses - losses are really possible in any military operation.
    BUT in this case is a risk for a small number of professional volunteers.
    When moving the conflict closer to our territory - it's not so simple - and the risks appear
    already for those very "yelling".
    1. 0
      30 September 2015 15: 21
      For this, EVERYONE must be PROFESSIONALS. True, everyone is in his place. And partisans for retraining regularly! The level of technology is changing, the options for equipment. There may not be enough professionals!
  50. +1
    30 September 2015 10: 36
    on the borders of Takzhikistan ALREADY built 3 ISIS camp for training militants and this is just the beginning


    You just need to understand - the meaning of this whole "fight against terrorism" which the United States is so actively engaged in now.
    Like, our people are really being led to the fact that they are there fighting with someone from jihadists.
    In fact, the USA is far away. And it’s very good for them to kindle endless fire in the center of Eurasia.

    You see, this is not a "conspiracy theory" - just a logical explanation.
    There are hundreds of mobile strike groups - "warriors of Allah", which are controlled by the United States and which can be brought down on any objectionable regime - be it Libya or Syria.

    BUT for their actions for obvious reasons - the United States does not respond!
    Conveniently ?
    At the same time, the United States is insistently demanding the departure of Assad - and then the NEW politician
    at the head of Syria SUDDENLY fences ISIS ...
    One thousand and one night psaki ..

    Those. At the point of convergence of interests of Europe, Russia, China and India, a certain Ygyl is being created - which has been stubbornly bombed for a year.
    And he only gets stronger and stronger ..

    THIS is a real danger for Russia. We are too close.
    It's not even Assad - it's in the North Caucasus ..

    So our planes appeared there rather late than suddenly.

    But no one could hide behind the pillars ...
  51. -1
    30 September 2015 10: 53
    US State Department head John Kerry said that The Russian side may become the next target of IS Islamists. In view of this, Russia should not independently take any military action against the Islamic State. Kerry made this statement in an interview with MSNBC.

    The Secretary General emphasized: If we do not find a way to unite in the fight against the Islamists of the Islamic State, and Russia begins to fight them alone, guess what will happen? Russia will be a target of ISIS. Russia will see people with MANPADS and airplanes falling from the sky.

    In addition, Russia will start denigrate. And they, together with Assad, will turn into a magnet for Islamists, Kerry said, adding that the only way to avoid all this is the voluntary resignation of the Syrian President.


    The State Department warns... bully DIRECT text.
    They have already prepared people with MANPADS... and when did they have time?? request
  52. 0
    30 September 2015 10: 56
    Now, with the presence of modern aircraft, the accuracy of Syrian Air Force strikes will increase significantly.
  53. 0
    30 September 2015 11: 09
    Golden shoulder straps
    Vladimir Pshenichny


    You stand and look at the open door.
    This door is not to Paris and not to the fashionable salons today.
    This door to war and everyone falls, falls from the roofs,
    Drops of gray rain on your golden shoulder straps.

    And your last battle awaits you ahead
    And perhaps even a miracle will not help to avoid it.
    But running away from war is not your principle,
    It's better to die here than to leave here.

    And let the rains wash this land,
    Memory sacredly preserves the blood-stained pages.
    You judge those days with great anticipation,
    This past may be knocking on our window.
  54. -1
    30 September 2015 12: 04
    Quote: BlackDragon
    Quote: Fighting Cat
    I’m afraid the Israeli hawks will suck here, since for them the area of ​​the base of the Russian Federation in Latakia within a radius of 300 km has become no longer a flight zone!

    when Assad built a nuclear reactor there, the flight zone was closed-blocked, it is completely unclear who flew in and razed everything to the ground, then the generals also traveled from Russia to find out why no one had noticed anyone.
    You're wasting your friend in vain! After all, there was a thing, we had to think about it and change something. (in air defense systems it was stated that they could hit from 5 meters and what and where? They say they flew low. I doubt that the plane can fly lower))). We need a cold and sober calculation and send really good weapons, otherwise it will turn out to be a big anti-advertising of Russian weapons like the field of 82 when the Israelis cleared out the Syrian air defense.
  55. +1
    30 September 2015 14: 03
    Does anyone know how pilots are rescued if a plane crashes or is shot down on enemy territory? On what helicopters?
  56. 0
    30 September 2015 18: 25
    Quote: vkl-47
    Mattress made clear snnimki. Only about Boeing and 200000 of our soldiers allegedly in Ukraine does not show

    Why show it? It’s enough to say from the zombie box that Ukrainians believe.
  57. +2
    30 September 2015 20: 01
    So that the number of takeoffs is equal to the number of landings! drinks
  58. +1
    30 September 2015 23: 13
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Of course, of course you are our professional - computer

    Hey Vata, where did you serve?


    Let me correct you - in which DOSAAF he studied
  59. 0
    1 October 2015 14: 00
    I looked at the photo and thought: “Stupid...”
    .
  60. 0
    1 October 2015 15: 27
    Quote: ty60
    Stingers are plentiful. Therefore, work from an inaccessible zone.


    Stinger firing range: 200-4500 m
    Maximum target height: 3800 m
    So if ISIS really has a lot of stingers, our pilots really wouldn’t mind being careful.
  61. +1
    1 October 2015 21: 22
    Quote: Sargaras
    Quote: ty60
    Stingers are plentiful. Therefore, work from an inaccessible zone.


    Stinger firing range: 200-4500 m
    Maximum target height: 3800 m
    So if ISIS really has a lot of stingers, our pilots really wouldn’t mind being careful.



    From the practice of the 80s, the stinger removed aircraft (VTA) from flight level 290. Multiply the numbers by 2.5.
  62. 0
    2 October 2015 09: 03
    Corresponds to reality. smile